DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of C Ontents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of C Ontents November 15–18 | Boston, Massachusetts Welcome to ASOR’s 2017 Annual Meeting 2–6 History of ASOR 7 Program-at-a-Glance 12–15 Members’ Meeting Agenda 15 Business Meetings and Special Events 16–17 Academic Program 20–52 Projects on Parade Poster Session 52–53 Contents Digital Archaeology Demo Showcase Posters 54–55 of 2017 Sponsors and Exhibitors 56–61 2016 Honors and Awards 65 Looking Ahead to the 2018 Annual Meeting 66 Honorifc and Memorial Gifs 67 Fiscal Year 2017 Honor Roll 68–69 Table Table ASOR’s Legacy Circle 70 2017 ACOR Jordanian Travel Scholarship Recipients 70 2017 Fellowship Recipients 71 ASOR Board of Trustees 72 ASOR Committees 73–75 Institutional Members 76 Overseas Centers 77 ASOR Staf 78 BASOR Recommendation Form 79 Paper Abstracts 82–187 Projects on Parade Poster Abstracts 188–194 Digital Archaeology Demo Showcase Poster Abstracts 195–201 Index of Sessions 202–204 Index of Presenters 205–211 Wif Information 212 Hotel Information and Floor Plans 213–215 Meeting Highlights 216 Cover photo by Selma Omerefendic ISBN 978-0-89757-107-4 ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2017 | 1 American Schools of Oriental Research | 2017 Annual Meeting Welcome from ASOR President, Susan Ackerman Welcome to ASOR’s 2017 Annual Meeting, which promises to be ASOR’s biggest ever. Already back in February, we received a record number of paper proposals, and the Programs Committee has worked overtime to put the best of these proposals together into the richest and fullest set of sessions we have ever been able to ofer—covering all the major regions of the Near East and wider Mediterranean from earliest times through the Islamic period. Te poster session too, is bursting at the seams, with a wealth of new and important research to be presented. Several special sessions this year mark important anniversaries. Tree diferent sessions focus on the 50th anniversary of the Madaba Plains Project (MPP), and the MPP’s ffieth anniversary will also be celebrated at a reception on Tursday night. Te CRANE Project—Computational Research on the Ancient Near East—is also celebrating an anniversary, its ffh, with two sessions on Friday afernoon and a reception that evening. Four other special sessions honor colleagues who have made especially distinguished contributions to the study of the Near East and the wider Mediterranean: Israel Finkelstein, Kenneth G. Holum, S. Tomas Parker, and Stuart Swiny. Other special receptions include the Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology (OREA) Reception on Tursday night and the Digital Archaeology Demo Showcase and Reception on Friday evening. Plus, our friends at the Harvard Semitic Museum have extended an invitation for as many of us as possible (for space reasons, there are a limited number of tickets available) to travel across the Charles River to join them for a reception on Saturday night. It is also appropriate that while we are in her home town, we honor one of one of ASOR’s most distinguished members, former Harvard University William Dorr Boardman Professor of Fine Arts Irene Winter, by inviting her to give this year’s plenary address, on the topic “Archaeology, Object History, Art History: Questions of Defnition and Discipline.” I’m also particularly excited about some of the new member-organized sessions that will be featured in the ASOR Annual Meeting Program this year: for example, “Christians and Muslims in the Medieval Near East”; “Material Interconnections in the Levant during the Second Millennium B.C.E.”; and “Study of Violence from the Region of the Ancient Near East and Its Neighbors.” Some noteworthy member-organized sessions have also been renewed, for example, “Te Archaeology of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq” and “Yerushalayim, Al Quds, Jerusalem: Recent Developments and Dilemmas in the Archaeological and Historical Studies from the Bronze Age to Medieval Periods.” Yet another important member- organized session, “Te Sof Power of Place—Cultural Diplomacy, Archaeology, and the Overseas Research Centers,” allows ASOR members to refect on the vital role played by our afliates in Jerusalem (the W. F. Albright Institute for Archaeological Research), Amman (the American Center for Oriental Research), and Nicosia (the Cyprus American Archaeological Research Institute). Te importance and the breadth of these member-organized sessions is vivid evidence of ASOR’s greatest asset—its committed and devoted membership—and this year’s meeting aims to engage that membership in new and better ways by moving the Members’ Meeting from Tursday, from 12:45–2:00 (a time when many members are just arriving at the meeting or even still in transit) to Friday at the same time block. We hope this makes it possible for many more of you to attend the meeting and participate both in the meeting’s business and in its celebration of the winners of this year’s ASOR Honors and Awards. But whether at the Members’ Meeting; in paper sessions; at the “Posters on Parade” event; at the Plenary Address; or at evening receptions, I look forward to seeing each and every one of you at ASOR’s 2017 Annual Meeting. Welcome to Boston! Susan Ackerman ASOR President 2 | ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2017 November 15–18 | Boston, Massachusetts Welcome from the Executive Director, Andrew Vaughn Welcome to our Annual Meeting in Boston! We are pleased to welcome the ASOR community to our hometown, which is overfowing with a rich array of culture, history, and architecture. Founded in 1630, Boston is one of the oldest cities in the United States and is Massachusetts’s capital and largest city. Boston’s history is showcased in numerous museums and historic sites and structures. Today, the area’s many colleges and universities make Boston an international center of higher education. Our conference hotel is located in the Seaport, a neighborhood nestled between Boston’s beautiful waterfront and the historic Fort Point district. With Tanksgiving nearly upon us, there are so many individuals to whom thanks are due for making our extraordinary program possible. Tis ambitious and wide- ranging meeting was overseen by one hard-working and talented committee in particular—the Annual Meeting Programs Committee, led by Co-Chairs Helen Dixon and Geof Emberling. Tese Co-Chairs, and the Programs Committee members with whom they work, are dedicated, diligent, enthusiastic, and committed to putting together an exciting educational program of more than 650 papers and poster presentations. Tis is a record number and more than a 40% increase over last year! A full listing of all committees can be found on the ASOR Committees pages of this program book. Many thanks are also due to the session chairs and presenters who will bring the program to life. I wish to thank several groups in particular for their generous fnancial support of receptions. Notably, the Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology (OREA) is sponsoring the reception on Tursday night; the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology together with the University of California, San Diego’s Center for Cyber-Archaeology and Sustainability and the Scripps Center for Marine Archaeology are co-hosting the Digital Archaeology Demo Showcase on Friday night. Te CRANE Project (Computational Research on the Ancient Near East) is hosting a reception on Friday evening as well. Te Foundation for Biblical Archaeology and its director, Sheila Bishop, are providing crucial fnancial support for student scholarships. In addition, I would like to thank all of our exhibitors and encourage you to stop by and visit the displays. We would like to give our special thanks to this year’s sponsors, Penn State University Press (Platinum) and Te University of Chicago (Silver). Last, but not least, I would like to extend special thanks and recognition to the ASOR staf. Teir hard work and dedication throughout the year makes our Annual Meeting possible. Please mark your calendars for our 2018 Annual Meeting, which will be held at the Denver Marriott Tech Center in the Denver Greenwood Village suburb from November 14–17, 2018. Please visit the meeting website at www.asor.org/am for details. We once again anticipate a record attendance and full hotel, so I encourage you to make your reservations early. Please let me, or any member of the ASOR staf, know if there is anything we can do to make your experience in Boston a pleasant and rewarding one. I hope you enjoy this year’s Annual Meeting. With warm regards, Andrew G. Vaughn ASOR Executive Director ASOR PROGRAM GUIDE 2017 | 3 American Schools of Oriental Research | 2017 Annual Meeting Welcome from the Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Richard Cofman Welcome to Boston, one of the oldest and most historic cities in the United States— which is appropriate considering we are here to learn about old stuf. Boston is one of America’s truly unique cities. From the Boston Harbor to Revolutionary War sites to Faneuil Hall Marketplace to Fenway Park to the multiple bastions of higher learning to the museums and restaurants, Boston is a veritable cornucopia of historic, educational, culinary, and cultural oferings. Speaking of cornucopias, we have one right here at the ASOR Annual Meeting. We received an all-time record number of abstract submissions this year—almost 700 paper proposals and 75 poster proposals. Tere are over 120 scheduled academic sessions to be led by a small army of intrepid archaeologists, biblical and Islamic scholars, anthropologists, conservators/curators, historians, and other interdisciplinary specialists working in the Near Eastern and Mediterranean regions. Since our last convocation, they have learned a lot of new stuf about old stuf and look forward to telling us what they learned and why it is important. But there is also cultural heritage to protect. And a new home to fnd.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context Julian Hirsch
    1 The Oberlin Near East Study Collection in Context *See page 4 for citation. Julian Hirsch 2 Acknowledgements In some ways the groundwork for my thesis and work on the ONESC Initiative began more than five years ago in a kitchen in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. I was meeting Dr. Elizabeth Bloch Smith for the first time and could scarcely have imagined that our meeting would lead to my participation in an archaeological excavation in Israel that summer. After my first excavation, I was hooked. The spring before I came to Oberlin was filled with weekly meetings, readings, and discussions with Liz. I learned so much in that time and appreciate her continued guidance and support. If Liz was responsible for exposing me to just how fascinating the archaeology of the southern Levant was, Dr. Jeffrey Blakely was the person who helped me find the path where I could follow my passion at Oberlin. I still have my notes from the first day of the January 2017 Winter Term. I was amazed by everything Jeff knew about the history of biblical archaeology at the college and the history of the collection. If anything inspired me throughout my work, it was hearing vivid stories from Jeff about sitting in Harry Thomas Frank’s classroom learning about archaeology. Jeff has truly been my partner at every step of the way. I’ve consulted him for advice numerous times. Jeff kindly provided invaluable suggestions that only a true veteran of the field could offer. To give credit to Jeff in two more areas, Jeff certainly inspired my interest in the history of biblical archaeology and during the Winter Term in 2017 assigned me to work on the Bab edh-Dhra’ collection of Early Bronze Age tomb pots.
    [Show full text]
  • TAU Archaeology the Jacob M
    TAU Archaeology The Jacob M. Alkow Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures and The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities | Tel Aviv University Number 4 | Summer 2018 Golden Jubilee Edition 1968–2018 TAU Archaeology Newsletter of The Jacob M. Alkow Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures and The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities Number 4 | Summer 2018 Editor: Alexandra Wrathall Graphics: Noa Evron Board: Oded Lipschits Ran Barkai Ido Koch Nirit Kedem Contact the editors and editorial board: [email protected] Discover more: Institute: archaeology.tau.ac.il Department: archaeo.tau.ac.il Cover Image: Professor Yohanan Aharoni teaching Tel Aviv University students in the field, during the 1969 season of the Tel Beer-sheba Expedition. (Courtesy of the Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University). Photo retouched by Sasha Flit and Yonatan Kedem. ISSN: 2521-0971 | EISSN: 252-098X Contents Message from the Chair of the Department and the Director of the Institute 2 Fieldwork 3 Tel Shimron, 2017 | Megan Sauter, Daniel M. Master, and Mario A.S. Martin 4 Excavation on the Western Slopes of the City of David (‘Giv’ati’), 2018 | Yuval Gadot and Yiftah Shalev 5 Exploring the Medieval Landscape of Khirbet Beit Mamzil, Jerusalem, 2018 | Omer Ze'evi, Yelena Elgart-Sharon, and Yuval Gadot 6 Central Timna Valley Excavations, 2018 | Erez Ben-Yosef and Benjamin
    [Show full text]
  • Tayinat's Building XVI: the Religious Dimensions and Significance of A
    Tayinat’s Building XVI: The Religious Dimensions and Significance of a Tripartite Temple at Neo-Assyrian Kunulua by Douglas Neal Petrovich A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto © Copyright by Douglas Neal Petrovich, 2016 Building XVI at Tell Tayinat: The Religious Dimensions and Significance of a Tripartite Temple at Neo-Assyrian Kunulua Douglas N. Petrovich Doctor of Philosophy Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations University of Toronto 2016 Abstract After the collapse of the Hittite Empire and most of the power structures in the Levant at the end of the Late Bronze Age, new kingdoms and powerful city-states arose to fill the vacuum over the course of the Iron Age. One new player that surfaced on the regional scene was the Kingdom of Palistin, which was centered at Kunulua, the ancient capital that has been identified positively with the site of Tell Tayinat in the Amuq Valley. The archaeological and epigraphical evidence that has surfaced in recent years has revealed that Palistin was a formidable kingdom, with numerous cities and territories having been enveloped within its orb. Kunulua and its kingdom eventually fell prey to the Neo-Assyrian Empire, which decimated the capital in 738 BC under Tiglath-pileser III. After Kunulua was rebuilt under Neo- Assyrian control, the city served as a provincial capital under Neo-Assyrian administration. Excavations of the 1930s uncovered a palatial district atop the tell, including a temple (Building II) that was adjacent to the main bit hilani palace of the king (Building I).
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Residue Analysis and the Earliest Uses of Pottery in the Ancient Middle East
    ORGANIC RESIDUE ANALYSIS AND THE EARLIEST USES OF POTTERY IN THE ANCIENT MIDDLE EAST by Michael William Gregg A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by Michael William Gregg 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60970-5 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60970-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Recycling in the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Evidence for Small Flakes Production by Means of Recycling at Ein-Zippori, Israel Yoni Parush 1,2, Richard W
    Flint recycling in the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: Evidence for small flakes production by means of recycling at Ein-Zippori, Israel Yoni Parush 1,2, Richard W. Yerkes 3, Bar Efrati 1,2, Ran Barkai 1,2, Avi Gopher 1,2 1. The Sonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel-Aviv University, POB 39040, 69978 Tel-Aviv, Israel. Email: Parush: [email protected]; Gopher: [email protected]; Barkai: [email protected]; Efrati: [email protected] 2. Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near East Cultures, Tel-Aviv University, POB 39040, 69978 Tel- Aviv, Israel. 3. Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, U.S.A. Email: Yerkes: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents a new techno-typological analysis of a sample of small flakes that were produced through recycling from discarded blanks at the late Pottery Neolithic and Early Bronze Age site of Ein-Zippori, Lower Galilee, Israel. This study shows that the systematic production of small flakes from previously discarded blanks was not related to a scarcity in raw materials, but rather to specific decisions concerning the types of tools needed to carry out necessary tasks. These results are supported by use-wear analysis briefly noted on here and presented in more detail in a separate paper. The results further indicate the importance of reconstructing the life history of recycled items and its influence on the composition and variability of the lithic assemblages. The results indicate that recycling was a significant lithic production trajectory during the late Pottery Neolithic and in the Early Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Re-Materialisation of Idrimi
    THE RE-MATERIALISATION OF IDRIMI Recorded at the BRITISH MUSEUM February 2017 Made as a facsimile by FACTUM FOUNDATION FOR DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN CONSERVATION for MAKING LIGHT THE RE-MATERIALISATION OF IDRIMI SEPTEMBER 2017 The Statue of Idrimi photographed during the recording session at the British Museum in February 2017 2 THE STATUE OF IDRIMI The statue of Idrimi, carved in magnesite with inlaid glass eyes, too delicate and rare to ever travel, has been kept in a glass case at the British Museum since its discovery by the British archaeologist Sir Leonard Woolley in 1939. It was ex- cavated in what is now part of Turkey at Tell Atchana, the remains of the ancient Syrian city-state of Alalakh. From the autobiographical cuneiform inscription on the statue, we know that Idrimi was King of Alalakh in the 15th century BC. A son of the royal house of Aleppo, Idrimi fled his home as a youth with his family and after spending some years in Emar and then amongst the tribes in Canaan, became King of Alalakh. At the time of inscribing the statue, Idrimi had ruled Alalakh for thirty years. The inscription is considered one of the most interesting cuneiform texts ever found, both because of its autobiographical nature and because of the rarity of the script. It describes Idrimi’s early life and escape from Aleppo into the steppes, his accession to power, as well as the military and social achievements of his reign. It places a curse on any person who moves the statue, erases or in any way alters the words, but the inscription ends by commending the scribe to the gods and with a blessing to those who would look at the statue and read the words: “I was king for 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in the Holy Land IRON AGE I
    AR 342/742: Archaeology in the Holy Land IRON AGE I: Manifest Identities READING: Elizabeth Bloch-Smith and Beth Alpert Nahkhai, "A Landscape Comes to Life: The Iron Age I, " Near Eastern Archaeology 62.2 (1999), pp. 62-92, 101-27; Elizabeth Bloch-Smith, "Israelite Ethnicity in Iron I: Archaeology Preserves What is Remembered and What is Forgotten in Israel's History," Journal of Biblical Literature 122/3 (2003), pp. 401-25. Wed. Sept. 7th Background: The Territory and the Neighborhood Fri. Sept. 9th The Egyptian New Kingdom Mon. Sept. 12th The Canaanites: Dan, Megiddo, & Lachish Wed. Sept. 14th The Philistines, part 1: Tel Miqne/Ekron & Ashkelon Fri. Sept. 16th The Philistines, part 2: Tel Qasile and Dor Mon. Sept. 19th The Israelites, part 1: 'Izbet Sartah Wed. Sept. 21st The Israelites, part 2: Mt. Ebal and the Bull Site Fri. Sept. 23rd Discussion day & short paper #1 due IRON AGE II: Nations and Narratives READING: Larry Herr, "The Iron Age II Period: Emerging Nations," Biblical Archaeologist 60.3 (1997), pp. 114-83; Seymour Gitin, "The Philistines: Neighbors of the Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Israelites," 100 Years of American Archaeology in the Middle East, D. R. Clark and V. H. Matthews, eds. (American Schools of Oriental Research, Boston: 2004), pp. 57-85; Judges 13:24-16:31; Steven Weitzman, "The Samson Story as Border Fiction," Biblical Interpretation 10,2 (2002), pp. 158-74; Azzan Yadin, "Goliath's Armor and Israelite Collective Memory," Vetus Testamentum 54.3 (2004), pp. 373-95. Mon. Sept. 26th The 10th century, part 1: Hazor and Gezer Wed.
    [Show full text]
  • Khirbet Kerak Publication Project 1
    oi.uchicago.edu 1 Khirbet Kerak Publication Project Douglas L. Esse he 1982T983 academic year was the inaugural year for the T Khirbet Kerak publication project. Khirbet Kerak (ancient Beth Yerah) is a site of approximately fifty acres located at the southwestern corner of the Sea of Galilee. The site guards the exit of the Jordan River from the Sea of Galilee. Khirbet Kerak was a large and thriving city throughout most of the third millennium B.C. The remains of this Early Bronze Age city were the focus of an archaeological project sponsored by the Oriental Institute in 1963 and 1964 and directed by Professor P. P. Delougaz. Professor Delougaz also directed the first phase of excavations at Khirbet Kerak in 1952. In the 1952 season the Oriental Institute team concentrated its work on the well-preserved Byzantine Church located at the northern portion of the tell. This church was fully published in OIP 85, A Byzantine Church at Khirbat al Karak. The Khirbet Kerak publication project is designed for the complete publication of the material recovered from the 1963-1964 excavation seasons. Although there is some Persian and Hellenistic material from those seasons, the bulk of the pottery and objects which are now being processed dates to the Early Bronze Age. In many of the trenches Early Bronze Age remains lay just below the surface, and in some cases the third millennium deposits were as much as seven meters thick. We are fortunate to have a complete stratigraphic sequence that spans the entire period from EB I through EB III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wofford Israel Trip Leaves on Friday, January 6, on a 15 Hour Flight from GSP, Through New York, and to Tel Aviv
    Wofford's Israel Trip JANUARY 01, 2006 ISRAEL BOUND on JANUARY 6! The Wofford Israel trip leaves on Friday, January 6, on a 15 hour flight from GSP, through New York, and to Tel Aviv. With the 7 hour time difference, it will "seem" like a 22 hour flight. If you thought sitting through an 80' lecture from Dr. Moss was tough; wait til you try a 15 hour flight! [Of course, that includes a 3 hour lay-over in NY]. JANUARY 07, 2006 First Day In Israel Hi from Nazareth! We made it to Israel safely and with almost all of our things. It is great to be here, but we are looking forward to a good night's rest. We left the airport around lunchtime today and spent the afternoon in Caesarea and Megiddo. We had our first taste of Israeli food at lunch in a local restaurant. It was a lot different from our typical American restaurants, but I think we all enjoyed it. Caesarea is a Roman city built on the Mediterranean by Herod a few years before Jesus was born. The city contains a theatre, bathhouse, aqueduct, and palace among other things. The theatre was large and had a beautiful view of the Mediterranean. There was an aqueduct (about 12 miles of which are still in tact) which provided water to the city. The palace, which sits on the edge of the water, was home to Pontius Pilot after Herod s death. We then went to Megiddo, which is a city, much of which was built by King Solomon over 3000 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-Academic.Pdf
    American Schools of Oriental Research | 2015 Annual Meeting November 18–21 | Atlanta, Georgia Academic Program 2015 ASOR Annual Meeting WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2015 1B Remembering Sharon Zuckerman: The Southern Levant in the Bronze and Iron Ages 7:00–8:15pm Windsor B Plenary Address Theme: Dr. Sharon Zuckerman passed away at the end of November 2014, in the midst of her life. Sharon was a brilliant researcher and a Venetian Ballroom talented archaeologist. This session is dedicated to her memory and works. Susan E. Alcock (Brown University), “Stepping It Up (Like a Ziggurat): The Place of ASOR in the 21st Century?” CHAIR: Shlomit Bechar (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Presiding PRESENTERS: 8:15–10:00pm 8:20 Introduction (5 min.) 8:25 Matthew J. Adams (W. F. Albright Institute of Opening Reception Archaeological Research), “The Archaeology of Windsor C & Pre-Function Abandonment at EB I–II Megiddo” (15 min.) 8:45 Shlomit Bechar (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), “The Late Bronze Age Administrative Palace at Tel Hazor” (15 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2015 min.) 9:05 Jesse Millek (Universität Tübingen), “Destruction 8:20–10:25am and Egyptian Hegemony in the Southern Levant: An Examination of ‘Egyptian’ Sites Destroyed at the End of the Late Bronze Age” (15 min.) 1A The History of Archaeology Windsor A 9:25 Jennie Ebeling (University of Evansville) and Danny Rosenberg (University of Haifa), “Late Bronze Age and Iron Age Basalt Vessel Industries at Hazor: Is There a CHAIR: Danielle Steen Fatkin (Knox College), Presiding Connection?” (15 min.) PRESENTERS: 9:45 Ayelet Gilboa (University of Haifa), Ilan Sharon (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), and Paula Waiman-Barak 8:20 Joseph Greene (Harvard University), “David Gordon Lyon (University of Haifa), “Contextualizing the Wenamun and the Beginnings of ‘Biblical Archaeology’ at Harvard” Report: Dor and Egypt in the Early Iron Age” (15 min.) (20 min.) 10:05 Irene J.
    [Show full text]
  • Theological Monthly
    Concoll~i(] Theological Monthly DECEMBER • 1959 The Theology of Synagog Architecture (As Reflected in the Excavation ReportS) By MARTIN H. SCHARLEMANN ~I-iE origins of the synagog are lost in the obscurity of the past. There seem to be adequate reasons for believing that this ~ religious institution did not exist in pre-Exilic times. Whether, however, the synagog came into being during the dark years of the Babylonian Captivity, or whether it dates back only to the early centuries after the return of the Jews to Palestine, is a matter of uncertainty. The oldest dated evidence we have for the existence of a synagog was found in Egypt in 1902 and consists of a marble slab which records the dedication of such a building at Schedia, near Alexandria. The inscription reads as follows: In honor of King Ptolemy and Queen Berenice, his sister and wife, and their children, the Jews (dedicate) this synagogue.1 Apparently the Ptolemy referred to is the one known as the Third, who ruled from 247 to 221 B. C. If this is true, it is not unreasonable to assume that the synagog existed as a religious institution in Egypt by the middle of the third century B. C. Interestingly enough, the inscription calls the edifice a :JtQOOE'UXY!, which is the word used in Acts 16 for something less than a per­ manent structure outside the city of Philippi. This was the standard Hellenistic term for what in Hebrew was (and is) normally known as no.pi'1 n~, the house of assembly, although there are contexts where it is referred to as i1~!:l~i'1 n::1, the house of prayer, possibly echoing Is.
    [Show full text]
  • January-February 2020
    january-february 2020 Burying the Truth Could Egypt Fall to Iran? JERUSALEM’S ORIGINS JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2020 | VOL. 2, NO. 1 | circulation: 1,193 FROM THE EDITOR The Incredible Origins of Ancient Jerusalem 1 Burying the Truth 6 Iran to Shift Focus to Africa? 11 Could Egypt Fall to Iran? 12 INFOGRAPHIC Top 10 Archaeological Discoveries of 2019 16 Archaeology Reveals Jerusalem’s Origins 22 julia goddard (cover) gary dorning (inside spread)/Watch Jerusalem Artist'sii watch rendition jerusalem of the Garden of Eden from the editor | By Gerald Flurry The Incredible Origins of Ancient Jerusalem An inspiring overview of the world’s most important and famous city he history of Jerusalem is the history of the world.” That is the opening line of “TJerusalem, an illuminating book chronicling the history of this city, written by British historian Simon Sebag Montefiore. In the introduction, Montefiore describes how absolutely central Jerusalem is in the history of human civilization, especially in the history and theology of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Using examples and anecdotes, he shows that Jerusalem has been a focal point for humanity from the beginning. He then asks this crucial question: “Of all the places in the world, why Jerusalem?” This question gets to the essence of understanding Jerusalem. Montefiore writes, “The site was remote from the trade routes of the Mediterranean coast; it was short of water, baked in the summer sun, chilled by winter winds, its jagged rocks blistered and inhospitable.” Despite these disadvantages, Jerusalem became the “center of the Earth.” Why? Anyone who is even the slightest bit familiar with the Bible knows that Jerusalem is at the heart of the biblical narrative.
    [Show full text]