A Forest-Based Circular Bioeconomy for Southern Europe: Visions, Opportunities and Challenges Reflections on the Bioeconomy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Forest-Based Circular Bioeconomy for Southern Europe: Visions, Opportunities and Challenges Reflections on the Bioeconomy synthesis report A forest-based circular bioeconomy for southern Europe: visions, opportunities and challenges Reflections on the bioeconomy Inazio Martinez de Arano (coord.) Bart Muys, Corrado Topi, Davide Pettenella, Diana Feliciano, Eric Rigolot, Francois Lefevre, Irina Prokofieva, Jalel Labidi, Jean Michel Carnus, Laura Secco, Massimo Fragiacomo, Maurizio Follesa, Mauro Masiero and Rodrigo Llano-Ponte. synthesis report A forest-based circular bioeconomy for southern Europe: visions, opportunities and challenges Authors (in alphabetical order after the coordinator) Inazio Martinez de Arano, European Forest Institute Bart Muys, Catholic University of Leuven Corrado Topi, Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York Davide Pettenella, University of Padova Diana Feliciano, University of Aberdeen Eric Rigolot, French National Institute for Agricultural Research Francois Lefevre, French National Institute for Agricultural Research Irina Prokofieva, Forest Sciences Centre of Catalonia Jalel Labidi, University of the Basque Country Jean Michel Carnus, French National Institute for Agricultural Research Laura Secco, University of Padova Massimo Fragiacomo, University of L’Aquila Maurizio Follesa, Dedalegno Mauro Masiero, University of Padova Rodrigo Llano-Ponte, University of the Basque Country Reflections on the bioeconomy March 2018 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Forest Institute. Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................13 Crossing the planetary boundaries ............................................................................................13 An emerging paradigm: the circular bioeconomy ....................................................................14 What is the role of the forest-based sector in the circular bioeconomy ..................................20 The forest-based circular bioeconomy in southern Europe as examined in this synthesis report ........................................................................................21 1. Setting the scene: Drivers, enablers and barriers in southern Europe ...............................22 1.1. Social and environmental challenges in the Euro-Mediterranean region ..................22 1.2. Strong bio-based sectors that can lead the bioeconomy transition .............................27 1.3. Forest and forest-based sectors in southern Europe .....................................................32 1.4. Forest-based industries in southern Europe ...................................................................36 1.5. High biological diversity: what is at stake?......................................................................37 2. Forests and forestry in southern European bioeconomy strategies ...................................41 2.1. The European Union strategy: A bioeconomy for Europe ...........................................41 2.2. A bioeconomy strategy for France (2017): Putting photosynthesis at the core of the economy ......................................................43 2.3. Bioeconomy in Italy (2017): A unique opportunity to reconnect economy, society and the environment ............................................................................................45 2.4. Portugal’s green growth commitment .............................................................................46 2.5. Spanish Strategy on Bioeconomy 2030 ...........................................................................49 2.6. Main gaps in national bioeconomy strategies .................................................................50 2.7. Approaches to the bioeconomy in smart specialization strategies ..............................52 3. Potential contribution of forests to a circular bioeconomy in key sectors and different regions .......................................................................................61 3.1. Advanced bio-products: emerging products and technologies ....................................61 3.2 Building with wood: current situation and future prospects .........................................67 3.3 The hidden potential of non-wood forest products ........................................................73 4. Unleashing the potential for the forest-based bioeconomy in southern Europe ..............79 4.1. Creating innovative bio-based products and services ...................................................79 4.2. The bioeconomy needs to be sustainable ........................................................................83 4.3. Adapting to and mitigating climate change ....................................................................90 4.4. Defragmenting forest ownership ......................................................................................96 5. Concluding remarks................................................................................................................103 References ....................................................................................................................................107 Foreword The Basque Country, like the rest of the world, raw materials produced sustainably from our is facing paramount environmental, social territories to preserve and restore our natural and economic challenges. Increasing human capital. The concept of circular bioeconomy wellbeing, prosperity and social justice, while presented in this report can be a decisive de- ensuring the lasting protection of the planet velopment to make these transitions possible. and its natural resources is the great endeav- Furthermore, it holds the promise to reconcile our of our times, one that is challenging and economic development with environmental fascinating in equal proportions. It requires protection in a post-oil era. Forests are a key fundamental changes to our economic mod- component of our landscape and forestry el, and to current patterns in the production is deeply rooted in our culture. We are very and consumption of goods and services. Like happy to have supported the European For- other regions of the world, Southern Europe est Institute in the compilation of this report, needs to find new ways to remain competitive which shows how forests can better contribute in the global economy. This shift relies heavily to the emerging bioeconomy, highlighting on our ability to make the most of the ongoing the opportunities lying ahead and the hurdles digital and biotechnological revolutions, cre- to overcome. We hope this work will generate ate a new generation of industrial capacities, further social debate, increase trans-regional decarbonise the economy and decouple eco- cooperation and stimulate positive action at nomic growth, environmental degradation multiple levels. and consumption of raw materials. This, in turn, requires three important socio-econom- ic transitions: the transition towards renew- able energies and energy efficiency to tackle Bittor Oroz Izagirre climate change. The transition towards a cir- Deputy Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food cular economy, to reduce material intensity of the Basque Government / Chair of the board of making more with less and finally, a biologi- the Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and cal transition towards renewable, indigenous Development, NEIKER. European Forest Institute • 5 Acknowledgements This report and its publication has been -fi and valuable contributions. The report has nanced by the Basque Government´s De- also benefited from helpful comments and partment of Economic Development and insights from external reviewers, Christian Competitiveness. It is based on a synthesis Patermann, Yves Birot and Lauri Hetemäki; of published research papers, grey literature we wish to express our gratitude for their very and reports produced by the European Com- valuable contribution and acknowledge that mission, governmental non-governmental they are not responsible for any shortcomings and corporate organisations and reflects the or remaining errors. Finally, Inazio Martinez authors’ knowledge-based understanding de Arano also wishes to thank EFI colleagues: and views. The ideas expressed here have Carmen Rodriguez, for supporting the re- been discussed and refined in a set of the- view of Smart Specialisation Strategies; Hans matic workshops. We want to thank speakers Verkerk for helping with facts and figures on and participants in the bioeconomy dialogues forests expansion and biomass availability; held in San Sebastian 2016, Calabria 2016 and and Albert Garduño for the excellent edit- Barcelona 2017, for their open discussions ing of the final document. European Forest Institute • 7 Executive Summary Addressing the societal and environmental form and performance economies. But, it is challenges presented by global change requires not enough to develop a strong bio-based sec- fundamental changes to the way our society tor. It is necessary to create a biological frame- produces and consumes goods and services.
Recommended publications
  • Simulation Tools for Decision Support to Adaptive Forest Management in Europe
    https://helda.helsinki.fi Simulation tools for decision support to adaptive forest management in Europe Muys, B. 2010 Muys , B , Hynynen , J , Palahi , M , Lexer , M J , Fabrika , M , Pretzsch , H , Gillet , F , Briceno-Elizondo , E , Nabuurs , G J & Kint , V 2010 , ' Simulation tools for decision support to adaptive forest management in Europe ' Forest Systems , vol 19 , pp. 86-99 . http://hdl.handle.net/10138/161938 Downloaded from Helda, University of Helsinki institutional repository. This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) Forest Systems 2010 19(SI), 86-99 Available online at www.inia.es/forestsystems ISSN: 1131-7965 eISSN: 2171-9845 Simulation tools for decision support to adaptive forest management in Europe B. Muys1*, J. Hynynen2, M. Palahí3, M. J. Lexer4, M. Fabrika5, H. Pretzsch6, F. Gillet7, E. Briceño8, G. J. Nabuurs9 and V. Kint1 1 Division Forest. Nature and Landscape. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Celestijnenlaan, 200E. P.O. Box 2411. BE-3001 Leuven. Belgium 2 Finnish Forest Research Institute (METLA) PL 18. FI-01301 Vantaa. Finland 3 European Forest Institute. Mediterranean Regional Office (EFIMED). Castella 33. 08018 Barcelona. Spain 4 Institute of Siviculture. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU). Peter Jordanstrasse, 82. AT-1190 Vienna. Austria 5 Faculty of Forestry. Technical University Zvolen. TG Masaryka, 24. SK-96053 Zvolen. Slovakia 6 Chair for Forest Growth and Yield Science. Faculty of Forest Science and Resource Management. Technische Universität München.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sustainable Innovation Economies Communities
    INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIES COMMUNITIES PROGRAM WELCOME TABLE OF CONTENTS TO AASHE 2014 IN PORTLAND, OREGON! 2 Host Committee Members/ AASHE Members Portland is a great host city, with a Climate Action Plan and remember the buzz that lead to the creation of in place to reduce 2009 levels of carbon emissions by AASHE. All of us owe a huge thank you to those original 4 Welcome from our Host Campus sponsors 80% by 2050. You will see Portland’s commitments organizers, particularly Tony Cortese, Steve Kolmes , 7 AASHE Host Campus Sponsors to sustainability at every turn which is one of the main and Judy Walton. A little over a year later AASHE was founded. reasons this year’s conference theme is Innovation for 9 2015 Sponsors Sustainable Economies and Communities. Whether you’ve attended every AASHE conference or this 10 Welcome to Portland, Oregon This year’s conference has an outstanding program is your first we welcome your feedback. Please let the of speakers and workshops, an exhibit hall filled with AASHE staff and board know how next year’s meeting can 11 Portland Facts & Trivia business partners and organizations with representatives be even better. In addition, the AASHE Listening Project interested in talking with you, and other participants initiated last year will continue at this conference. The 12 Sustainability at Oregon Convention Center ready to network. You will discover that there is a goal is to gauge how AASHE is meeting member needs 14 Food & Beverage at AASHE 2014 unique mix of faculty, administrators, sustainability and how we can improve.
    [Show full text]
  • SC2019 Action and Resources Guide
    SuStainable Cleveland 2019 Action and Resources Guide BuildinG An eConomiC enGine to empoweR A green City on A Blue lAke table of ContentS i SC2019 Action and ReSourceS Guide Table of Contents Table of Contents i Contributors iii Executive Summary vii SECTION 1 : AliGnment & ACtion Guide 1.0 context 2 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Sustainable Economy Context 10 1.3 Economic Model 17 1.4 Cluster Overview 21 2.0 strateGiC framewoRk 30 2.1 Strategic Framework 31 2.2 Personal & Social Environment 35 2.3 Natural Environment 43 2.4 Built Environment 51 2.5 Business Environment 58 3.0 action plAn : CelebratinG pRogress 66 3.1 Action Plan : Celebrating Progress 67 Energy Efficiency 70 Local Foods 75 Renewable Resources 77 Waste 81 Water 84 Green Space 87 Transportation 90 Vital Neighborhoods 94 table of ContentS ii SC2019 Action and ReSourceS Guide Table of Contents SECTION 2: BACkground And Resource Guide 96 4.0 biG piCtuRe : eConomy 97 4.1 Clustering 98 4.2 Local Economy 123 5.3 Climate Prosperity 133 5.0 implementAtion 143 5.1 Implementation Overview 144 5.2 Stewardship Structures 145 5.3 Initiative Design & Evaluation 149 5.4 Measuring Progress 160 5.5 Communication: Branding 167 APPENDICes Appendix A: Bibliography 182 Appendix B: Metrics Starter-Kit 188 Appendix C: Sustainability Assets 202 Appendix D: Outreach 206 Appendix E: Brand Background 210 Appendix F: Example “Postcard” Initiatives 214 Appendix G: City of Cleveland Initiatives 224 ContRibutors iii SC2019 Action and ReSourceS Guide sC2019 AdvisoRy CounCil Harriet Applegate BAiJu Shah A F
    [Show full text]
  • Investing to Achieve Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    Cornerstone UN SDG Series: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure Investing to Align with SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure Investment in infrastructure and innovation are crucial drivers of economic growth and development, and are key to finding lasting solutions to both economic and environmental challenges. Promoting sustainable industries and investing in scientific research and innovation are all important ways to facilitate sustainable development. More than 4 billion people still do not have access to the Internet, and 90% are from the developing world. Bridging this digital divide is crucial to ensuring equal access to information and knowledge, as well as fostering innovation and entrepreneurship.1 SDG 9 is further refined by targets that can be more easily translated into actions. These targets highlight the interconnected nature of the goals. For example, strategies to support inclusive industrialization and innovation also promote progress toward SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 8 (Decent Work & Economic Growth). Below are a series of synergies What are the UN SDGs? that can come from providing access to products, services and systems that work to drive The UN Sustainable Development Goals Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. (SDGs) are a collection of 17 global goals set by the UN General Assembly in 2015. Fair Treatment and Equal Opportunity The SDGs are a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, Recent research points to a strong connection between openness to different cultures now and into the future. The SDGs are and ideas, and the ability of a place to adapt to economic changes and grow.2,3 Currently, part of Resolution 70/1 of the UNGA titled however, not all are equally able to innovate.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Forest Service's New Wood Utilization Center ______Secretary Glickman Expressed Theodore L
    An Overview of the Forest Service's New Wood Utilization Center ___________________________________________________________________________ Secretary Glickman expressed Theodore L. Laufenberg his support for efforts to improve Charles G. Shaw III Southeast Alaska's economy in a press USDA--Forest Service release dated January 17, 1999 from the Pacific Northwest Research Station United States Department of Agriculture. _____________________________________ He said, "Federal agency cooperation will unify and enhance the opportunities for economic assistance to workers, families, businesses, and communities affected by the changing timber industry in southeastern Alaska." He went on to discuss the establishment by the Forest Service of the Wood Utilization Center in Sitka. In the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 budget appropriation for Interior and related agencies, the USDA Forest Service (FS) was directed to establish and commence operating a harvesting and wood utilization laboratory in Sitka, Alaska with no less than five, full-time employees. Even though the enabling legislation was in an appropriations bill, no funds were provided to support the program. The Forest Service is implementing the mandate in FY 1999 with FY 1998 carry-over funds, but does not have funding for the laboratory specifically identified in the FY 2000 Budget being considered by Congress. Ted Laufenberg was detailed to Sitka for one year as acting team leader for the Wood Utilization Center (WUC). Over the past 19 years as a research engineer, project leader, and, most recently, program manager at the Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) in Madison, Wisconsin, Ted has worked with a wide array of wood products; collaborated with a host of academic, government, and commercial interests; and advanced numerous science-policy initiatives on topics such as free trade, recycling, and environmentally-preferable purchasing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of Biotechnology to Industrial Sustainability – a Primer
    THE APPLICATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRIAL SUSTAINABILITY – A PRIMER ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2 FOREWORD This short paper is based on the OECD publication, “The Application of Biotechnology to Industrial Sustainability”. The Task Force on Biotechnology for Sustainable Industrial Development of the OECD’s Working Party on Biotechnology contributed to this primer which was prepared by the Chairman of the Task Force, Dr. John Jaworski, Industry Canada, Canada. Special thanks are due to Dr. Mike Griffiths (OECD Consultant) as well as to those who contributed to the case studies set out in the publication on which the primer is based. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 6 What is Industrial Sustainability? ............................................................................................................... 6 Moving Toward More Sustainable Industries............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceeding of International Conference on Biodiversity for Sustainable Industries
    Proceeding of International Conference on Biodiversity for Sustainable Industries VOL.1/JUNE/2017 ISBN:978-602-61830-0-2 presented by: P R O C E E D I N G ISBN: 978-602-61830-0-2 ICBSI June 2017 ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF YEAST INVOLVED IN COCOA FERMENTATION TO BE USED AS A STARTER TO IMPROVE COCOA BEAN QUALITY Yusya’ Abubakar*, Heru P. Widayat, Martunis, Murna Muzaifa, Rizka Try Gustina Department of Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Syiah Kuala University, Jl. Tgk. H. Krueng Kalee 3, Banda Aceh, Aceh. Indonesia *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT - Indonesia has been known as the third largest cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) producer in the world. However, most of Indonesian cocoa is considered as low in quality due to unfermented bean. Bean fermentation has been introduced to smallholder farmers in Aceh, but the quality of bean produced is not consistent. Among factors determining a succesfull fermentation is involvment of major microorganisms, including yeast which is grown naturally around cocoa beans in the first 24 hours of fermentation. Therefore, this study is aimed to isolate and identify the type of yeasts involved in the cocoa fermentation process. Then, the yeast is being used as starter in cocoa fermentation to improve the bean quality. Improving cocoa quality is very important to improve farmer competitiveness, which in turn will enhance cocoa production sustainability. Samples of microorganisms taken from the best cocoa mass fermentation were isolated to obtain pure yeast culture. The culture was identified conventionally by observing (testing) its morphological and biochemical properties. The results showed that the six isolates predominantly grown fall into four different yeasts genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Industry Clusters 2010 Report
    Coordinating Workforce and Economic Development around Strategic Industry Clusters A Progress Report on Substitute House Bill 1323 December 15, 2010 Eleni Papadakis, Executive Director, Workforce Board Egils Milbergs, Executive Director, Washington Economic Development Commission Charles Earl, Executive Director, State Board for Community and Technical Colleges Rogers Weed, Director, Department of Commerce Paul Trause, Commissioner, Employment Security Department ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Workforce Training & Education Coordinating Board Bryan Wilson, Deputy Director Joyce Ahlering, Policy Analyst/Legislative Liaison Washington Economic Development Commission Egils Milbergs, Executive Director Noreen Hoban, Assistant to the Executive Director State Board for Community and Technical Colleges Tina Bloomer, Policy Associate, Workforce Development Pat Ward, Program Administrator, Workforce Education Washington State Department of Commerce Daniel Malarkey, Deputy Director Spencer Cohen, Research Manager SHB 1323 Progress Report 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary.………………………………………………………......…4 II. Identifying industry clusters.……………………………………………………5 A. What are Washington’s current clusters? i. Industry clusters: A state and local analysis B. Washington Economic Development Commission focuses on the clusters of tomorrow i. Washington’s 12 Innovation Clusters III. State agency services and funding for industry clusters…………..............12 A. Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board...………………12 i. Industry Skill Panel Grants ii. High Skills, High Wages Strategic Fund Grants iii. Mid-Level High Demand Programs B. Higher Education…………………………………………………………....16 i. Baccalaureate-Level High Demand Programs ii. Strategically Targeted Academic Research Teams/Innovation Research Teams C. Department of Commerce…………………………………………….........20 i. Innovation Partnership Zones ii. Community Economic Revitalization Board iii. Public Works Trust Fund iv. Associate Development Organizations v. Aerospace Council vi. Clean Energy Leadership Council vii. Global Health D.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 12 of Newberg Inventory of Natural and Cultural Resources
    Economic Opportunities Analysis Section 12 of Newberg Inventory of Natural and Cultural Resources Originally Adopted by Newberg City Council January 3, 2006 (Ordinance No. 2006-2635) Revised May 20, 2013 (Ordinance No. 2013-2761) City of Newberg Economic Opportunities Analysis Table of Contents Table of Tables ............................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Figures .............................................................................................................................. 3 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Economic Trends Analysis ..................................................................................................... 6 National, State and Regional Trends .......................................................................................... 6 Regional Economic Development Industry Clusters and Targeted Industries ......................... 12 Yamhill County Agri-Business ................................................................................................. 13 Regional Industrial Land Availability ...................................................................................... 16 Newberg Population Profile ...................................................................................................... 17 Historic and Future Growth Trends .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Indicators for Sustainable Industries and Sustainable Industrial Development (RISI)
    Resource Indicators for Sustainable Industries and Sustainable Industrial Development (RISI) Project Duration Nov 2011 - Jan 2012 Fostering sustainable industries and industrial development requires the use of effective indicators. Though a multitude of indicators exist, their applicability to sustainable industries remains largely unaddressed to date. In this project, Ecologic Institute reviewed scientific knowledge in order to evaluate existing indicators and derive recommendations concerning their usability and potential need for further indicator development. Ecologic Institute published a shorter version of the project results as a policy brief. The policy brief is available for download. Increasing resource efficiency is one of the core themes of sustainable development, aiming to facilitate the improvement of socio-economic well-being while reducing resource use and its associated environmental impacts. Though in this context sustainable industries and sustainable industrial development must play a crucial role globally, both in alleviating poverty and in achieving development without adverse environmental impacts, they are still only marginally addressed. This is reflected in the discussions towards supplementing and integrating the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to be defined and agreed on in the course of the Rio+20 process. Both MDGs and SDGs appear to lack specific targets for industries and industrial development. While the MDGs outline concrete, partly quantifiable objectives to drastically reduce extreme poverty by 2015, they do not provide guidance or indicators on improving resource efficiency and in particular do not address the industrial sector. Though the SDGs proposed by the Governments of Colombia and Guatemala [pdf, 455 kB, English] include resources relevant to industries and industrial development (in particular water and energy), they make no reference to industries or industrial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Green Jobs in the United Nations Joint Programmes
    Integrating Green Jobs in the United Nations Joint Programmes. A Guidance Note Promoting Green Jobs is central to achieving The concept of Green Jobs promotes MDG1 on poverty reduction and MDG7 on opportunities for job creation and a socially fair environmental sustainability. Climate change and transition towards a Greener Economy in which the excessive use of scarce resources combined vulnerabilities, changes in the labour market and with persistent poverty require proactive and new business models are addressed through timely policies to create pathways to sustainable inclusive social dialogue. It provides a means to development - with decent work for all. The much bridge social, economic, and environmental needed innovative strategies can only succeed priorities by offering an integrated development with the full engagement of enterprises and strategy that can help to promote both workers. environmental and social sustainability. Objective and Outline of the Guidance Note The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to The third section breaks down a range of strategies by UN Country teams on how to integrate Green Jobs at sector and provides links to further information sources country level, including joint programmes and the UN which can serve as tools to adapt Green Jobs priorities Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) process. to specific country contexts. The sectors covered are: Green Jobs assessments should be the first step to . Energy inform and plan for a national strategy or joint UN . Agriculture programme. National and local-context-specific studies . Water should identify socio-economic opportunities, needs . Fisheries and impacts. Forestry . Waste Management The first section of the guidance note will define the .
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the Way to a European Circular Bioeconomy Strategy
    FROM SCIENCE TO POLICY 5 Leading the way to a European circular bioeconomy strategy Lauri Hetemäki, Marc Hanewinkel, Bart Muys, Markku Ollikainen, Marc Palahí and Antoni Trasobares Foreword Esko Aho, Cristina Narbona Ruiz, Göran Persson and Janez Potočnik From Science to Policy 5 Authors Marc Hanewinkel is Professor of Forest Economics and Forest Management in the Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg. Lauri Hetemäki is Assistant Director of the European Forest Institute and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Forest Science, University of Helsinki. Bart Muys is Professor of Forest Ecology and Management, in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Leuven. Markku Ollikainen is Professor of Environmental and Resource Economics in the Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki and Chair of the Finnish Climate Panel. Marc Palahí is Director of the European Forest Institute. Antoni Trasobares is Director of Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya (CTFC). Advisors Esko Aho is Strategic Advisor for the European Forest Institute and former Prime Minister of Finland (1991–1995). Cristina Narbona Ruiz is Counselor, Nuclear Safety Council, and President of the Spanish Socialist Worker’s Party (PSOE) and former Minister of Environment, Spain (2004–2008). Göran Persson is the President of the European Forest Institute’s ThinkForest Forum, and former Prime Minister of Sweden (1996–2006). Janez Potocnik is the Co-Chair of International Resource Panel, United Nations Environment Programme and former European Commissioner (2004–2014) and former Minister for European Affairs, Slovenia (2002–2004). ISSN 2343-1229 (print) ISSN 2343-1237 (online) ISBN 978-952-5980-39-4 (print) ISBN 978-952-5980-40-0 (online) Editor in chief: Pekka Leskinen Managing editor: Rach Colling Layout: Grano Oy / Jouni Halonen Printing: Grano Oy Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Forest Institute.
    [Show full text]