DOCSLIB.ORG

“We Drop a Comrade's Tear”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“We Drop a Comrade's Tear” “We drop a comrade's tear” Colonel Edward Lyon Bailey and the Second New Hampshire Infantry at Gettysburg Karlton D. Smith Colonel Edward Lyon Bailey led the 2nd New Hampshire to Gettysburg with a "firm determination to do or die." Despite heavy losses among the officers and men, the regiment remained "firm and fearless." The 2nd New Hampshire was able to survive its encounter at Gettysburg due to the skills of its officers, and particularly, to the leadership skills of Colonel Bailey.1 The 2nd New Hampshire was originally organized as a three-month regiment. The Abbot Guards of Manchester, one of the first companies to be raised in New Hampshire, had gone to Concord as part of the 1st New Hampshire. On May 1, 1861, the company marched forty-five miles to Portsmouth to join the 2nd New Hampshire under the command of Colonel Thomas Prescott Pierce.2 Pierce, then serving as the U.S. Postmaster of Manchester, New Hampshire, had served with the 9th U.S. Infantry during the Mexican War and had seen action at Contreras and Churubusco. By May 10, 979 men, all enlisted for three months, had arrived at camp and were being "drilled, disciplined and made acquainted with the duties pertaining to a soldier's life." When the U.S. War Department ordered the governor not to send any more three-month men, the regiment was re- organized, between May 31 and June 8, as a three-year unit. With this change in the unit’s status, Colonel Pierce resigned on June 4, 1861.3 The unit’s new colonel, Gilman Marston, was a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard. He had served as a member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives (1845-1849) and as a delegate to the state constitutional convention in 1850. He had been elected as a Republican to the Thirty-sixth U.S. Congress (and would be re-elected to the Thirty-seventh Congress and serve until March 3, 1863). Marston and the 1,046 officers and men of the 2nd New Hampshire were mustered into federal service on June 10 at Portsmouth.4 Edward L. Bailey was born December 10, 1841 in Manchester, New Hampshire. Edward was one of nine children born to Hiram and Elizabeth (Lyon) Bailey, and the only son. He received his education from the common schools of Manchester. Bailey had served as the chief clerk at the Manchester Post Office and had no previous military experience. The friendship and 101 influence of Postmaster (and first colonel of the 2nd) Thomas P. Pierce were largely responsible for Bailey's early commission as a first lieutenant in the Abbot Guards. On June 4, 1861, during the regimental re-organization, Bailey was elected captain of Company I (the former Abbot Guards) "which position he filled to the acceptance of men under and officers over him."5 It was believed that "every officer should be a gentleman, and cultivate good manners ..." An officer was also expected to be … brave, intelligent, and courteous. He should be patient, just, and reliable. He should be ambitious of distinction, industrious in acquiring knowledge of his profession, and conscientious in the performance of his duties.6 As a company commander, Bailey was responsible for governing and administrating his company as well as establishing a regular routine. He was responsible for the instruction of his officers and non-commissioned officers in tactics and for "the cultivation of a military spirit and pride in the profession among the men." As long as Bailey paid "strict attention to duty, an honest regard for the men, and a constant self-respect, guided by equal and exact justice to all," he would be able to "command the most insubordinate set of men."7 Bailey, with the approval of the regimental commander, had the power to appoint, and reduce, non-commissioned officers. This power was exercised jointly so that a company commander could not reappoint someone who had been "justly" reduced, and to prevent him from exercising any "undue favoritism."8 Bailey was responsible for keeping the company books (all nine of them), the most important being the Descriptive Book, the Clothing Book, the Muster Roll, and the Company Monthly Return. If these books were correct, "all the others must be right of necessity." He was also responsible for the daily, monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, quarto-monthly, and annual reports, not to mention other papers that were required "when circumstances render them necessary."9 Captain Bailey was also required to serve as Officer of the Day. He was responsible for the "good order, cleanliness, and attention to the daily duties throughout the camp or garrison." He received his orders from his commanding officer and transmitted them to his subordinates. He was responsible for all the guards, police, and fatigue parties.10 If any company commander, such as Edward L. Bailey, performed his duties well, "no wise and beneficent ruler ever derived more heartfelt homage, more faithful services, or more patriotic devotion, then [sic] a just, competent, and faithful commander receives from his company. They will love him truly, they will obey him faithfully and they will stand by him whilst there is life in the hour of battle."11 The state of New Hampshire equipped the 2nd New Hampshire "in the most thorough and comprehensive manner according to the military standard of the day." The men received gray uniforms with "jaunty forage caps" and spike-tailed dress coats. Nine of the companies received .69 caliber smoothbore muskets. The men of Company B, thanks to subscriptions by the citizens of Concord, were armed with Sharps rifles.12 While in camp Bailey's company staged the “rug-hash war" against the character of their rations. The entire company was placed under guard in its quarters for two days for "mutinous conduct" in that they “wouldn't eat the hash ration furnished at the Commissary's [sic], but marched to the city in a body and procured more palatable food." The rebellion, however, "effected the desired change in the interest of the whole regiment." What part Captain Bailey played in this rebellion is unclear.13 The 2nd New Hampshire left Portsmouth by railroad on the morning of June 20 and arrived in Boston at about noon. Colonel Marston, in addressing an association of the Sons of New Hampshire, stated: "We have not left our happy and peaceful homes for a war of conquest or oppression of anybody. We have taken up arms to preserve the freest and best government against the most causeless rebellion ever conceived. And we will do it!"14 102 The regiment moved by railroad to Fall River, Massachusetts, transferred to the steamboat Bay State, and arrived in New York City at about 11 A.M. on June 21. The regiment was again warmly welcomed by the association of the Sons of New Hampshire. One of the speakers exhorted the men, "Onward! Onward! then, shall be our motto, as we know it is yours; onward, until the demon of treason and disunion is crushed from our land, the Yankee Doodle and The Star Spangled Banner shall again thrill the hearts of a patriotic, a united, an invincible people."15 Rail cars transported the regiment from New York that afternoon for Washington, D.C., which it reached about noon on June 23. While passing through New Jersey, Lieutenant Charles W. Walker became the regiment's first casualty when he fell from the train and later died of his injuries. The regiment went into camp on Colorama Hill, a mile north of Washington. On July 2, it was placed in the brigade of Colonel Ambrose E. Burnside of the 1st Rhode Island.16 The New Englanders embarked on their first campaign on July 16. Five days later they arrived on the battlefield of Bull Run at about 10:30 A.M. Early in the engagement Colonel Marston was wounded in the shoulder by a rifle ball but returned later to "tumultuous applause." Lieutenant Colonel Frank S. Fiske led the regiment through most of the battle. Despite being in their first engagement, Fiske reported that the men obeyed orders with coolness and precision. They took every position they were ordered to, and never wavered or retired until ordered to do so, and were among the last, if not the last, to leave the field. Their retreat on the whole route to their camp was unattended by tumult or any disorder further than leaving their ranks. Their conduct throughout the day inspires me with entire confidence in their courage and steadiness ...17 Early in August the regiment was moved to Bladensburg, Maryland for two months of drilling and learning the duties of military life. On August 4, the regiment was placed in a brigade, later division, commanded by Brigadier General Joseph Hooker. On September 5, the regiment exchanged its smoothbores for Springfield rifled-muskets, except for Company B, which retained its Sharps rifles. The regiment also received its first installment of recruits when ninety-seven men arrived in camp. With the onset of winter, the men were put to work erecting winter quarters and building corduroy roads.18 This was not an easy time for the regiment. On November 29, Captain James W. Carr, Company C, reported that the health of his company was not very good. Tents being poor and not having received orders to go into winter quarters, we have not built so comfortable barracks as we otherwise would. The discipline of the company is good. Arms and equipment in good order and all the well men are anxiously waiting for action.19 In April of 1862, the 2nd was assigned to Brigadier General Henry M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of Civil War Soldiers' Discussion of Free Time in Camp Madeline Norton Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2014 Killing Time: An Analysis of Civil War Soldiers' Discussion of Free Time in Camp Madeline Norton Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Military History Commons, Nonfiction Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Norton, Madeline, "Killing Time: An Analysis of Civil War Soldiers' Discussion of Free Time in Camp" (2014). Honors Theses. 569. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/569 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Killing Time: An Analysis of Civil War Soldiers’ Discussion of Free Time in Camp By Madeline Norton Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History Department of History Union College March 2014 Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………iv Chapter One: Introduction………………………………………………………………….1 Chapter Two: Date Ordered Letters and Diaries………………………………...18 Chapter Three: Winter Encampments……………………………………………….35 Chapter Four: Officers and Infantry…………………………………………………..52 Chapter Five: Conclusion………………………………………………………………….67 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………72 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………………79 iii NORTON, MADELINE Killing Time: An Analysis of Civil War Soldiers’ Discussion of Free Time in Camp While most Civil War history deals with a glorified and romanticized version of a soldier’s experience of war, the time a soldier spent combating the idleness of camp proved to be a more consuming battle. Though lacking in grandeur, how a soldier ‘killed time’ provides an important yet often overlooked insight into the camaraderie and culture of Civil War soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalsecond Bullrun Campaign Under Pope That the Whole Corps Had to Be Detached from the Army of the Potomac for Rest and Recuperation
    PITTSBURGH VOLUNTEERS WITH SICKLES' EXCELSIOR BRIGADE Bruce Sutherland PART 3 Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville Heintzelman's Third Corps had been so badly mauled in the battles on the Peninsula under McClellan and in the GeneralSecond BullRun campaign under Pope that the whole Corps had to be detached from the Army of the Potomac for rest and recuperation. The three divisions of the Corps were assigned to that quiet sector known as the Defenses of Washington. General Hooker's old division, the Second, was placed temporarily under the command of General Grover while Colonel Nelson Taylor commanded the Excelsior Brigade, subject to General Sickles' return. Early in September 1862, the Excelsior regiments were en- camped about two miles southwest of Alexandria near Fort Lyon. They had fallen back from the Chantilly battlefield and as William Wiley of the Friend Rifles describes it, "We only went a short dis- tance beyond that field when we again laid on our arms, and it was raining and very cold. No sleeping was done that night. The next morning we got a loaf of bread and started off again towards Fairfax and then left itand went out scouting through the country until dark when we camped again on a beautiful farm and where we lived well for that night on corn, potatoes and apples. At daylight, the morning of the 3rd, we were on the move towards Alexandria ... J>1 The column moved through thickly wooded country toward the Potomac at Pohick Church and by early afternoon the troops were on the river road which skirted Mount Vernon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Haynes, Martin A. a History of the Second Regiment, New Hampshire
    Haynes, Martin A. A History of the Second Regiment, New Hampshire Volunteer Infantry, in the War of the Rebellion. Lakeport, N.H.: n.p., 1896. Don’t used the shorter 1865 version CHAPTER I. April, 1861, to July 15, 1861— EARLY REQUISITIONS FOR TROOPS— SECOND REGIMENT ORGANIZED FOR THREE MONTHS' SERVICE— RE-ORGANIZED AS THREE YEARS REGIMENT — " CAMP CONSTITUTION," AT PORTSMOUTH— OFF FOR THE WAR— OVATIONS IN BOSTON AND NEW YORK— ACCIDENTAL DEATH OF LIEUTENANT WALKER— THE MARCH THROUGH BALTIMORE—" CAMP SULLIVAN," AT WASHINGTON— THE TRAGEDY OF CORPORAL CALEF— THE SECOND ATTACHED TO BURNSIDE'S BRIGADE. 1 CHAPTER II. July 16 to 22, 1861— THE FIRST BULL RUN CAMPAIGN— ADVANCE INTO VIRGINIA— CAPTAIN EPHRAIM WESTON— IN CAMP NEAR CENTREVILLE— ADVANCE TO BULL RUN— A FEMALE PROPHET— SECOND FIRES ON A GEORGIA REGIMENT— CHARLES TABER'S EXPERIENCE— IMBODEN'S REBEL BATTERY — COLONEL MARSTON WOUNDED— UNION REINFORCEMENTS ARRIVE— MCDOWELL ANNOUNCES A VICTORY-BATTLE RENEWED— THE SECOND ON THE HENRY HILL— INCIDENTS OF THE RETREAT— JOHN L. RICE— THE AFFAIR AT CUB RUN— AMPUTATION OF ISAAC W. DERBY'S ARM— REPORT OF LIEUT. COL. FISKE. 29 CHAPTER III. July 23, 1861, to April 10, 1862.— HOOKER'S BRIGADE ORGANIZED AT BLADENSBURG— MARCH TO THE LOWER POTOMAC— SECOND IN CAMP AT HILLTOP— A YOUNG MARYLANDER TAUGHT A LESSON— STAKING OFF THE GUARD LINE— WINTER CAMP AT BUDD'S FERRY— INCIDENTS OF THE REBEL BLOCKADE— GEN. NAGLEE IN COMMAND OF BRIGADE— MARSTON'S FAMOUS DUNGEON— MARSTON BEATS GEN. MCCLELLAN'S ORDNANCE OFFICER— THE REBELS EVACUATE THEIR POSITIONS- MURDER OF LUTHER W. FASSETT BY REBEL SCOUTS— HOOKER'S DIVISION EMBARK FOR THE PENINSULA— THE SECOND REGIMENT STORM-BOUND AT POINT LOOKOUT.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    THIRTY-NINTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1865, TO MARCH 3, 1867 FIRST SESSION—December 4, 1865, to July 28, 1866 SECOND SESSION—December 3, 1866, to March 3, 1867 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 4, 1865, to March 11, 1865 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—ANDREW JOHNSON, 1 of Tennessee PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—LAFAYETTE S. FOSTER, 2 of Connecticut; BENJAMIN F. WADE, 3 of Ohio SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—JOHN W. FORNEY, of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—GEORGE T. BROWN, of Illinois SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—SCHUYLER COLFAX, 4 of Indiana CLERK OF THE HOUSE—EDWARD MCPHERSON, 5 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—NATHANIEL G. ORDWAY, of New Hampshire DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—IRA GOODNOW, of Vermont POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE—JOSIAH GIVEN ALABAMA James Dixon, Hartford GEORGIA SENATORS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES Vacant Vacant Henry C. Deming, Hartford REPRESENTATIVES 6 Samuel L. Warner, Middletown REPRESENTATIVES Vacant Augustus Brandegee, New London Vacant John H. Hubbard, Litchfield ARKANSAS ILLINOIS SENATORS SENATORS Vacant DELAWARE Lyman Trumbull, Chicago Richard Yates, Jacksonville REPRESENTATIVES SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES Vacant Willard Saulsbury, Georgetown George R. Riddle, Wilmington John Wentworth, Chicago CALIFORNIA John F. Farnsworth, St. Charles SENATORS REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE Elihu B. Washburne, Galena James A. McDougall, San Francisco John A. Nicholson, Dover Abner C. Harding, Monmouth John Conness, Sacramento Ebon C. Ingersoll, Peoria Burton C. Cook, Ottawa REPRESENTATIVES FLORIDA Henry P. H. Bromwell, Charleston Donald C. McRuer, San Francisco Shelby M. Cullom, Springfield William Higby, Calaveras SENATORS Lewis W. Ross, Lewistown John Bidwell, Chico Vacant 7 Anthony Thornton, Shelbyville Vacant 8 Samuel S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knapsack Raleigh Civil War Round Table the Same Rain Falls on Both Friend and Foe
    The Knapsack Raleigh Civil War Round Table The same rain falls on both friend and foe. June 24, 2017 Volume 17 Our 196th Meeting Number 6 http://www.raleighcwrt.org June 24 Meeting Features Symposium On Reconstruction in North Carolina The Raleigh Civil War Round Table’s June 2017 NOTE: The symposium will be held at our usual meeting will be a special weekend event featuring meeting place at the N.C. Museum of History but will four well-known authors and historians speaking on run from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. on Sat., June 24. The reconstruction in North Carolina. event also will cost $30 per person. Federal Occupation of North Carolina Women’s Role in Reconstruction Mark Bradley, staff historian at the Angela Robbins, assistant professor of U.S. Army Center of Military History in history at Meredith College in Raleigh, Washington, D.C., will speak on the will speak on the women’s role in re- federal occupation. Mark is nationally construction. She has also taught at known for his knowledge of the Battle UNC-Greensboro and Wake Forest of Bentonville and the surrender at University. She received her Ph.D. in Bennett Place. He also is an award- U.S. History from UNC-Greensboro in winning author, having written This 2010. Her dissertation research looked Astounding Close: The Road to Bennett Place, Last at strategies used by women in the North Carolina Stand in the Carolinas: The Battle of Bentonville, Piedmont to support themselves and their families in and Bluecoats and Tar Heels: Soldiers and Civilians the unstable post-Civil War economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Excelsior Brigade and the Civil War
    To Bleed for a Higher Cause: The Excelsior Brigade and the Civil War Francis Butler History 390: Honors New York and the Civil War December 4, 2012 Butler 1 Joseph Hopkins Twichell, the Chaplain of the Excelsior Brigade, wrote that as he saw the destruction caused during the Battle of Williamsburg all he could think was, “’sin entered into the world and death through sin.”1 The Civil War was the bloodiest conflict in American history; it was a war that claimed the lives of nearly 700,000 Americans and came close ripping the nation asunder.2 Describing why men volunteered to fight and die during this bloody war, Abraham Lincoln stated that the Civil War soldier served because of his “patriotism, political bias, ambition, personal courage, love of adventure, [and] want of employment.”3 Indeed, during the Civil War, the armies of the Union and the Confederacy were fed most often by volunteers. It were these men who enlisted at the war’s inception, and reenlisted when their terms of service expired, who did most of the fighting and dying on the Civil War’s many sanguine battlefields. As James McPherson states, internal motivations such as patriotism, a sense of duty and honor, courage, moral convictions, or want of adventure had to be powerful inspirations for the Civil War soldier to volunteer since the majority of Civil War soldiers chose to fight. 4 Once in the army, Civil War soldiers were continually motivated and supported by the bonds that they shared with each other, by their Christian faith, and by the inspiration of brave officers.5 By analyzing who the men of New York’s Excelsior Brigade, comprised of the 70th through 74th New York volunteer regiments, were and what they experienced during the war, it is possible to understand how patriotism, duty, and faith inspired soldiers to serve and how faith, camaraderie, courage, connection to home, and inspiring leadership enabled these soldiers to 1 Joseph Hopkins Twichell to Edward Twichell, May 9, 1862, , The Civil War Letters of Joseph Hopkins Twichell, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T E R
    N E W S L E T T E R Volume 51, No. 3 Fall 2014 View of Mount Washington from North Conway by Benjamin Champney (1817–1907), 1851. BENJAMIN CHAMPNEY DRAWINGS ACQUIRED AT AUCTION Through the efforts and support of P. Andrews drawings in detail. As a result, the Society’s McLane and Charles O. Vogel, together with 15 Champney collection is now one of the best publicly additional donors, the Society purchased 105 draw- accessible resources documenting this artist’s work in ings by artist Benjamin Champney from Eldred’s the White Mountains. Auctioneers in East Dennis, Massachusetts. Part of a collection found in Minnesota, most of the drawings “We invite interested and knowledgeable scholars and focus on the Conway area from 1850 to 1863. Others collectors to examine the collection online and help depict Champney’s trips to Vermont and New York in further identify scenes, locations, and possible dates,” 1853 and to Europe in 1865. said Wes Balla, the Society’s director of collections and exhibitions. Soon, conservators will prepare Following preliminary cataloging and imaging, the condition reports and treatment proposals with new collection is already available through the estimated costs for the cleaning and conservation of Society’s online catalog at nhhistory.org, where the drawings. scholars, collectors, and the public can examine the (continued page 8) New Hampshire Historical Society Newsletter Page 2 Fall 2014 New Hampshire Historical Society Newsletter Page 3 Fall 2014 RESIDENT S ESSAGE A key part of the plan involves the building’s 11 skylights covering 40 P ’ M percent of its roof area.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas City and the Great Western Migration, 1840-1865
    SEIZING THE ELEPHANT: KANSAS CITY AND THE GREAT WESTERN MIGRATION, 1840-1865 ___________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________ By DARIN TUCK John H. Wigger JULY 2018 © Copyright by Darin Tuck 2018 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled SEIZING THE ELEPHANT: KANSAS CITY AND THE GREAT WESTERN MIGRATION, 1840-1865 Presented by Darin Tuck, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. __________________________________________________ Professor John Wigger __________________________________________________ Assoc. Professor Catherine Rymph __________________________________________________ Assoc. Professor Robert Smale __________________________________________________ Assoc. Professor Rebecca Meisenbach __________________________________________________ Assoc. Professor Carli Conklin To my mother and father, Ronald and Lynn Tuck My inspiration ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation was only possible because of the financial and scholarly support of the National Park Service’s National Trails Intermountain Region office. Frank Norris in particular served as encourager, editor, and sage throughout
    [Show full text]
  • Third Regiment
    HISTORY OF THE THIRD REGIMENT EXCELSIOR BRIGADE 72d New York Volunteer Infantry COMPILED BY HENRI LE FEVRE BROWN SERGEANT COMPANY B. 1902 JOURNAL PRINTING CO., JAMESTOWN, Nm Ye 1902. INTRODUCTION. In preparing this history the official war records have been carefully searched for all material that could in any way contribute to a full understanding of the events ner- rated. Wherever possible battles and movements have been described in the language of official reports. In some cased, als in that of Williamsburg, the same engagement is described in several such papers, written by the command- ers of the regiment, the brigade and the division, with often a brief recognition of the service of the reginlent from still higher. sourws. Orders, reports and extracts bearing on this history are given word for word as writhen, and in many cases, witl?~.outother explanations of the events referred to. Promotions and changes of command are announced in general orders. In this way the experience of the regi- ment will be more rea.dily followed than if the narrative were cumbered with unimportant details. There czn be no questlion that many officers and men not mentioned i11 this history by name, were equally worthy, and perha.ps more worthy of notice than those whose nalmes and deeds are here given. In view of tlhe impossibility of doing exact justice to all, the rule has beell followed to make honorable mention only of those alreadp named in official records. All regimental papers have been examined in detail. The personal diary of the compiler has been compared with that of the chaplain for all rrlovements since January 1, 1863, and differences have been reconciled to the satisfaction OF both.
    [Show full text]
  • Disregarded Hero of the Battle of Gettysburg
    Southern New Hampshire University Dan Sickles: Disregarded Hero of The Battle of Gettysburg A Capstone Project Submitted to the College of Online and Continuing Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Arts in History By James Robert Gray Sr. Athens, Georgia July, 2018 Copyright © 2018 by James Robert Gray Sr. All Rights Reserved ii Student: James Robert Gray Sr. I certify that this student has met the requirements for formatting the capstone project and that this project is suitable for preservation in the University Archive. July 16, 2018 __________________________________________ _______________ Southern New Hampshire University Date College of Online and Continuing Education iii Abstract Dan Sickles has been regarded by many historians as a political general who was a buffoon and led his troops into harm’s way at Gettysburg for personal glory. This paper examines Sickles’ early personal history, why that history has led historians to examine Sickles in a critical fashion with a historical lens, and why Sickles has been disregarded as the true hero of Gettysburg. Sickles was a lover of women causing him to perhaps have an affair with his mother-in- law, visit prostitutes, introduce one prostitute to the Queen of England, and ultimate to murder his wife’s lover in a rage that allowed him to be acquitted on an insanity defense. Sickles entered the Civil War looking to redeem his reputation and develop a military hero role for himself. Gettysburg would allow him the opportunity for that role, but events and his own future behaviors would prevent historians to view him in the role of hero.
    [Show full text]
  • 96> ? SOLDIER in the SOUTHWEST: the CAREER of GENERAL AV
    Soldier in the Southwest: the career of General A. V. Kautz, 1869-1886 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wallace, Andrew Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 12:35:25 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552260 7?/ /96> ? zyz /, / {LOjO. >2y SOLDIER IN THE SOUTHWEST: THE CAREER OF GENERAL A. V. KAUTZ, 1869-1886 by ANDREW WALLACE Volume I A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In The Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1968 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Andrew W h-U r c p __________________________________ entitled _________ Soldier in the Southwest:______________ The Career of General A. V. Kautz, 1869-1886 be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy_________________________ Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Williamsburg
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1980 The Battle of Williamsburg Carol Kettenburg Dubbs College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dubbs, Carol Kettenburg, "The Battle of Williamsburg" (1980). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625106. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-bjb5-9e76 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BATTLE OF WILLIAMSBURG tf A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Carol Ann Kettenburg 1980 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, May 1980 LudweXl H. 'John^Vn JLJJLA Mi Royer luoyne Edward' M. Riley DEDICATION To my mother and father iii TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................... v LIST OP MAPS................................................ vi ABSTRACT................................................... vii CHAPTER I ...............................................
    [Show full text]