ISC Annual Report 2003-2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISC Annual Report 2003-2004 Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2003–2004 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP Intelligence Services Act 1994 Chapter 13 Cm 6240 £10.50 Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2003–2004 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP Intelligence Services Act 1994 Chapter 13 Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty JUNE 2004 Cm 6240 £10.50 ©Crown Copyright 2004 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2–16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] From the Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE 70 Whitehall London SW1 2AS 26 May 2004 Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA In September 2003 the Committee produced a unanimous Report following our inquiry into Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and Assessments. I now enclose the Intelligence and Security Committee’s Annual Report for 2003–04. This Report records how we have examined the expenditure, administration and policies of the three intelligence and security Agencies. We also report to you on a number of other Agency related matters and the wider intelligence community. ANN TAYLOR iii THE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP (Chairman) The Rt. Hon. James Arbuthnot, MP The Rt. Hon. Alan Howarth CBE, MP The Rt. Hon. The Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC The Rt. Hon. Michael Mates, MP The Rt. Hon. Kevin Barron, MP The Rt. Hon. Joyce Quin, MP The Rt. Hon. Alan Beith, MP The Rt. Hon. Gavin Strang, MP i. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) is established under the Intelligence Services Act 1994 to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the United Kingdom’s three intelligence and security Agencies: the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) and the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). The Committee also takes evidence from the Security and Intelligence Co-ordinator, the Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) and the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS), as well as departments and other organisations that receive secret intelligence from the Agencies. ii. The Prime Minister, in consultation with the leaders of the two main Opposition parties, appoints the Committee from members of both Houses of Parliament. Nominations are put forward by the Government and Opposition parties’ whips, in a broadly similar way to the nomination of select committee members in the House of Commons. iii. The members are notified under the Official Secrets Act 1989 and, as such, operate within “the ring of secrecy”. The Committee sees significant amounts of classified material in carrying out its duties and it takes evidence from Cabinet Ministers and senior officials – all of which is used to formulate its Reports. iv. The Committee is required by the Act to produce an Annual Report on the discharge of its functions, which the Prime Minister is required to lay before Parliament, and the Committee can and does produce other Reports on specific topics. When laying a Report before Parliament, the Prime Minister, in consultation with the Committee, excludes any parts of the Report (indicated by the *** in the text) that would be prejudicial to the continuing discharge of the functions of the three intelligence and security Agencies. To date, no material has been excluded without the Committee’s consent. iv CONTENTS The Intelligence and Security Committee Page iv Glossary Pages 3–4 Introduction Pages 5–10 The Threat Pages 5–8 The Limitations of Intelligence Pages 9–10 Work Programme Page 10 Expenditure and Resources Pages 11–19 Spending Review 2004 Pages 11–12 Public Service Agreements Pages 12–13 Security Service Pages 13–14 Secret Intelligence Service Pages 14–15 Government Communications Headquarters Pages 15–17 New Accommodation Programme Pages 16–17 Serious Organised Crime Pages 17–18 BBC Monitoring Pages 18–19 Administration Pages 20–21 Staff Page 20 Legal Matters Pages 20–21 Policy Pages 22–24 International Co-operation on Terrorism Pages 22–23 Relations with the Media Page 24 Special Branch Page 24 Weapons of Mass Destruction Pages 25–26 Iraq Pages 25–26 Libya Page 26 Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre Pages 27–28 Counter-espionage Pages 29–30 The Intelligence Community Pages 31–35 Ministerial Involvement Page 31 Security and Intelligence Co-ordinator Pages 31–32 Joint Intelligence Committee and Assessments Staff Page 32 Defence Intelligence Staff Pages 32–33 SCOPE Pages 33–34 Information Assurance and Communications Pages 34–35 1 Collection Pages 36–38 Requirements and Priorities Page 36 Collection Gaps Pages 37–38 Assessment Pages 39–40 Other Matters Pages 41–43 Postal Screening Page 41 Acts of Parliament Pages 41–43 The Official Secrets Acts Pages 41–43 The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Page 43 Act 2000 Conclusions and Recommendations Pages 44–48 Annex A – Those Who Have Given Oral Evidence Pages 49–50 2 GLOSSARY CESG Communication, Electronics and Security Group CIA Central Intelligence Agency CIG Current Intelligence Group CNI Critical National Infrastructure CSI Ministerial Committee on the Intelligence Services CSIA Central Sponsor for Information Assurance DIS Defence Intelligence Staff DOP(IT) Ministerial Sub-committee: Defence and Overseas Policy (International Terrorism) FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office FBIS Foreign Broadcast Information Service (US organisation) GCHQ Government Communications Headquarters GSIA Government Strategy for Information Assurance IT Information Technology ISC Intelligence and Security Committee JARIC Joint Air Reconnaissance Intelligence Centre JIC Joint Intelligence Committee JTAC Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre LOC Limited Operational Capability (part of the SCOPE programme) MoD Ministry of Defence NAO National Audit Office NCIS National Criminal Intelligence Service NISCC National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination Centre PFI Private Finance Initiative 3 POAC Proscribed Organisation Appeals Commission PSAs Public Service Agreements PSIS Permanent Secretaries’ Committee on the Intelligence Services PSX Ministerial Sub-committee: Public Services and Public Expenditure RICs Regional Intelligence Cells R&P Requirements and Priorities SDAs Service Delivery Agreements SIA Single Intelligence Account SIAC Special Immigration Appeals Commission Sigint Signals Intelligence SIS Secret Intelligence Service SO Official Committee on Security SOCA Serious Organised Crime Agency SO(IS) Information Systems Security Policy Sub-committee of SO SR2000 Spending Review 2000 SR2002 Spending Review 2002 SR2004 Spending Review 2004 TIDO(H) Official Committee on Domestic and International Terrorism (Home) TIW Temporary Intelligence Watch TRANSEC Security Division of the Department for Transport TTIC Terrorist Threat Integration Centre (US organisation) UKIMN UK Intelligence Messaging Network WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction 4 INTRODUCTION 1. The period from May 2003 to May 2004 has been an extremely difficult one for the intelligence and security Agencies and the whole of the UK intelligence community. Not only have they been faced with greater threats and challenges but they have, perhaps more than ever before, been subjected to intense public scrutiny of elements of their work. This has meant that the ways in which intelligence is authorised, collected, analysed, assessed, disseminated and used have been examined and criticised in a way that has put a spotlight on those used to working in the background. 2. During this time the Agencies have continued to fulfil their statutory duties: operating at home and around the world, alone or with international partners, and gathering intelligence to identify, monitor, report and disrupt threats to the UK and its interests. Their task is to inform decision-makers and allow the formulation of policy to be based on more information than is available from open sources. 3. The work of the Agencies, most of which is necessarily unpublicised, is primarily focused on international terrorism, on preventing the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and associated technologies and on the protection of UK interests, including deployed forces. It is often undertaken at great personal risk in places such as Afghanistan and Iraq. Most of the hard work that the Agencies do every year will never be made public. The staffs of the Agencies are to be commended for what they have done in difficult circumstances: in particular we should record that UK Force Commanders in the Gulf reported to us that they had been well served by the intelligence community during military action. The Threat 4. Since the end of the Cold War, the demands on the intelligence and security Agencies have changed significantly: the threats have become more numerous and varied. Initially, there was a belief, now recognised as misplaced, that this was an opportunity to reduce the Agencies (and the Armed Forces) as the threat was seen to have diminished. But, in a world no longer dominated by opposing super powers, new threats emerged, such as terrorism inspired by Islamic extremism, and organised crime increased
Recommended publications
  • Was There an Armenian Genocide?
    WAS THERE AN ARMENIAN GENOCIDE? GEOFFREY ROBERTSON QC’S OPINION WITH REFERENCE TO FOREIGN & COMMONWEALTH OFFICE DOCUMENTS WHICH SHOW HOW BRITISH MINISTERS, PARLIAMENT AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN MISLED 9 OCTOBER 2009 “HMG is open to criticism in terms of the ethical dimension. But given the importance of our relations (political, strategic and commercial) with Turkey ... the current line is the only feasible option.” Policy Memorandum, Foreign & Commonwealth Office to Minister 12 April 1999 GRQCopCover9_wb.indd 1 20/10/2009 11:53 Was there an Armenian Genocide? Geoffrey Robertson QC’s Opinion 9 October 2009 NOTE ON THE AUTHOR Geoffrey Robertson QC is founder and Head of Doughty Street Chambers. He has appeared in many countries as counsel in leading cases in constitutional, criminal and international law, and served as first President of the UN War Crimes Court in Sierra Leone, where he authored landmark decisions on the limits of amnesties, the illegality of recruiting child soldiers and other critical issues in the development of international criminal law. He sits as a Recorder and is a Master of Middle Temple and a visiting professor in human rights law at Queen Mary College. In 2008, he was appointed by the Secretary General as one of three distinguished jurist members of the UN Justice Council. His books include Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice; The Justice Game (Memoir) and The Tyrannicide Brief, an award-winning study of the trial of Charles I. GRQCopCover9_wb.indd 2 20/10/2009 11:53 Was there an Armenian Genocide? Geoffrey Robertson QC’s Opinion 9 October 2009 PREFACE In recent years, governments of the United Kingdom have refused to accept that the deportations and massacres of Armenians in Turkey in 1915 -16 amounted to genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I27.Indd
    Issue 27 March/April 2005 scottishleftreview £1.50 / £1.00 claimants Really, why bother? salvaging something from the general election scottishleftreviewIssue 27 March/April 2005 Contents Feedback.........................................................2 Old age poverty .............................................16 Ian Tasker Comment ........................................................4 What’s going on in America? ........................18 Briefing ...........................................................6 Bernie Sanders You’re a socialist; can you vote Labour? ........9 Politics is a joke ............................................20 John Flint Tommy Sheppard, Elaine Smith An MOT for MP hopefuls...............................12 Atomised science..........................................22 Jim and Margaret Cuthbert Henry McCubbin Reviews .........................................................24 feedback Letters for publication should be emailed to [email protected] he current Labour government is deeply unpopular but precisely because it is a weak Labour government. Then the Tit is more than likely to be re-elected but with a reduced extent of ordinary people’s participation in politics may be more majority. than just voting once every five years, or not even voting at all in many cases. The Conservatives offer little in the way of a serious challenge because they are still despised and internally fractious. The Professor Gregor Gall, University of Stirling Liberal Democrats are a more serious challenge in terms of ideas and policies but lack the critical mass to make a breakthrough. Parties to the left of Labour without PR are no he report commissioned by the Federation of Small more than clutches of protest votes. TBusinesses and the Sunday Herald reveals that Scotland is Does this amount to a democratic deficit, or even a crisis of not “the best small country in the world”, as claimed by Jack democracy, in Britain? Whether it does will depend upon two McConnell.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and Assessments
    5972_ISC FC_BC_i 10/9/03 12:18 am Page c Intelligence and Security Committee Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and Assessments Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP Cm 5972 £10.50 5972_ISC FC_BC_i 10/9/03 3:11 pm Page i Intelligence and Security Committee Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and Assessments Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty SEPTEMBER 2003 Cm 5972 £10.50 5972_ISC ii_iv 10/9/03 12:17 am Page ii ©Crown Copyright 2003 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] 5972_ISC ii_iv 10/9/03 12:17 am Page iii iii 5972_ISC ii_iv 10/9/03 12:17 am Page iv INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE The Rt. Hon. Ann Taylor, MP (Chairman) The Rt. Hon. James Arbuthnot, MP The Rt. Hon. Alan Howarth CBE, MP The Rt. Hon. The Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC Mr Michael Mates, MP The Rt. Hon. Kevin Barron, MP The Rt. Hon. Joyce Quin, MP The Rt. Hon. Alan Beith, MP The Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Biographical Notes on Labour Mps, Meps and Peers
    Appendix: Biographical Notes on Labour MPs, MEPs and Peers Abbreviations hp hereditary peer LBLG Leader, British Labour Group LEPLP Leader, European Parliamentary Labour Party LLP Leader of the Labour Party lp life peer MP Member of Parliament MEP Member of the European Parliament (elected since 1979) mep Member of the Commons or Lords delegated to the European Parliament before 1979 PM Prime Minister Albu, Austen (1903–93) MP 48–74 Archer, Peter (1926–) MP 66–92; lp 92 Ardwick, John (Beavan) (1910–94) lp 70; mep 75–79 Ashton, Joe (1933–) MP 68–01 Attlee, Clement (1883–1967) MP 22–55; LLP 35–55; PM 45–51; hp 55 Balfe, Richard (1944–) MEP 79– Barnes, Michael (1932–) MP 66–74 Barnett, Joel (1923–) MP 64–83; lp 83 Becket, Margaret (1943–) MP 83– Benn, Tony (1925–) MP 50–60, 63–83, 84–01 Berry, Roger (1948–) MP 92– Bevan, Aneurin (1897–1960) MP 29–60 Bevin, Ernest (1881–1951) MP 40–51 Bidwell, Sidney (1917–97) MP 66–92 Blair, Tony (1953–) MP 83–; LLP 94–; PM 97– Boothroyd, Betty (1929–) MP 73–2000; mep 75–77 Bradley, Tom (1926–) MP 62–83 (Lab –81; SDP –83) Brown, George (1914–85) MP 45–70; lp 70 Brown, Gordon (1951–) MP 83– Brown, Ron (1921–) MP 64–83 (Lab –81; SDP –83) Bruce, Donald (1912–) MP 45–50; lp 1974–; mep 75–79 Caborn, Richard (1943–) MEP 79–84; MP 83– Callaghan, James (1912–) MP 45–87; LLP 76–81; PM 76–79; lp 87 Castle, Barbara (1910–) MP 45–79; MEP 79–94; LBLG 79–85; lp 79 Castle, Ted (1907–79) lp 74; mep 75–79 Clinton Davis, Stanley (1928–) MP 70–83; EC 85–88; lp 90 Clwyd, Anne (1937–) MEP 79–84; MP 84– Coates, Ken (1930–) MEP
    [Show full text]
  • Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Statement of Accounts 2019/20
    Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Statement of Accounts 2019/20 This page has been left intentionally blank. Reference and Administration Details of Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums for the period ended 31 March 2020 Strategic Board Members: Rt. Hon Baroness Joyce Quin (Chair) Independent Cllr Ged Bell (Joint Vice Chair) Newcastle City Council Cllr Angela Douglas (Joint Vice Chair) Gateshead Council Professor Vee Pollock Newcastle University Cllr Sarah Day North Tyneside Council Cllr Alan Kerr South Tyneside Council Cllr Cath Davis North Tyneside Council (Rotating Member) Cllr Joan Atkinson South Tyneside Council (Rotating Member) Jonathan Blackie Independent Member Sarah Green Independent Member Helen Cadzow Independent Member (Appointed 28/06/2019) Director: Iain Watson Head Office: Discovery Museum, Blandford Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4JA Auditors: MHA Tait Walker, Bulman House, Regent Centre, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 3LS Solicitors: John Softly, Newcastle City Council, Civic Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8QH STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT Nature of governing document Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums (TWAM) is a joint service of the four local authorities on Tyneside: Newcastle (which acts as lead authority and legal body), South Tyneside, North Tyneside, and Gateshead, with additional support and contributions from the Arts Council England (ACE). The relationship between, and commitment of, the partners is enshrined in the Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Joint Agreement. The Joint Agreement lays out the terms and conditions of the relationship. Policy and decision making is undertaken by the Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Strategic Board and key decisions are outlined in the Corporate Plan 2018-2022. Appropriate consultation takes place about budget priorities and budget proposals, which shapes the budget decisions that are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Cut Off in the Original 232 6
    IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk TEXT CUT OFF IN THE ORIGINAL 232 6 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE Between 1983 and 1989 there were a series of important changes to Party organisation. Some of these were deliberately pursued, some were more unexpected. All were critical causes, effects and aspects of the transformation. Changes occurred in PLP whipping, Party finance, membership administration, disciplinary procedures, candidate selection, the policy-making process and, most famously, campaign organisation. This chapter makes a number of assertions about this process of organisational change which are original and are inspired by and enhance the search for complexity. It is argued that the organisational aspect of the transformation of the 1980s resulted from multiple causes and the inter-retroaction of those causes rather than from one over-riding cause. In particular, the existing literature has identified organisational reform as originating with a conscious pursuit by the core leadership of greater control over the Party (Heffernan ~\ . !.. ~ and Marqusee 1992: passim~ Shaw 1994: 108). This chapter asserts that while such conscious .... ~.. ,', .. :~. pursuit was one cause, other factors such as ad hoc responses to events .. ,t~~" ~owth of a presidential approach, the use of powers already in existence and the decline of oppositional forces acted as other causes. This emphasis upon multiple causes of change is clearly in keeping with the search for complexity. 233 This chapter also represents the first detailed outline and analysis of centralisation as it related not just to organisational matters but also to the issue of policy-making. In the same vein the chapter is particularly significant because it relates the centralisation of policy-making to policy reform as it occurred between 1983 and 1987 not just in relation to the Policy Review as is the approach of previous analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship Celebrating 25 Years 1994-2019
    VISITING PARLIAMENTARY FELLOWSHIP CELEBRATING 25 YEARS 1994-2019 St Antony's College 1 Roger Goodman, Warden of St Antony’s At a recent breakfast with the students, it was decided that the College should do more to advertise what distinguished it from other colleges in Oxford. St Antony’s is: The Oxford college founded by a Frenchman The Oxford college with two Patron Saints (St Antony of Egypt and St Antony of Padua) The Oxford college where almost 90% of the 500 graduate students are from outside UK and the alumni come from 129 countries The Oxford college with international influence: ‘In the mid-2000s, 5% of the world’s foreign ministers had studied at St Antony’s’ (Nick Cohen, The Guardian, 8 Nov, 2015) The Oxford college mentioned in the novels of both John Le Carré and Robert Harris The Oxford college which holds the most weekly academic seminars and workshops The Oxford college with two award-winning new buildings in the past decade To this list can be added: St Antony’s is the Oxford college with a Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship (VPF). There is no other Oxford college that can boast such a list of parliamentarians responsible for a seminar programme over such a long period of time. The College is immensely proud of the Fellowship and greatly indebted to all those who have held it over the past 25 years. We were very grateful to those who have were able to come to the 25th anniversary celebration of the Fellowship programme at the House of Commons on 24 April 2019 and for the many generous letters from those who could not.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Statement of Accounts 2018/19
    Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Statement of Accounts 2018/19 Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Contents Reference and Administrative Details 1 Explanatory Foreword 2 to 14 Independent Auditors' Report 15 to 17 Statement of Financial Activities 18 Balance Sheet 19 Cash Flow Statement 20 Notes to the Financial Statements 21 to 39 Reference and Administration Details of Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums for the period ended 31 March 2019 Strategic Board Members: Rt. Hon Baroness Joyce Quin (Chair) Independent Cllr Kim McGuiness (Joint Vice Chair) Newcastle City Council Cllr Angela Douglas (Joint Vice Chair) Gateshead Council Professor Vee Pollock Newcastle University Cllr Sarah Day North Tyneside Council Cllr Alan Kerr South Tyneside Council Cllr Neil Weatherley Gateshead Council (Rotating Member) Cllr Linda Wright Newcastle City Council (Rotating Member) Jonathan Blackie Independent Member Sarah Green Independent Member Ian Renwick Independent Member (Resigned 01/02/2019) Director: Iain Watson Senior Management Team: Jackie Reynolds, Head of Finance, Governance & Resources: Bill Griffiths, Head of Programmes Head Office: Discovery Museum, Blandford Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4JA Auditors: MHA Tait Walker, Bulman House, Regent Centre, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 3LS Solicitors: John Softly, Newcastle City Council, Civic Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8QH TYNE & WEAR ARCHIVES & MUSEUMS STRUCTURE, GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT Nature of governing document Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums (TWAM) is a joint service of the four local authorities on Tyneside: Newcastle (which acts as lead authority and legal body), South Tyneside, North Tyneside, and Gateshead, with additional support and contributions from the Arts Council England (ACE). The relationship between, and commitment of, the partners is enshrined in the Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Joint Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Since 1979 191
    RESEARCH PAPER 09/31 Members since 1979 20 APRIL 2009 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979, together with basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and the House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. Since this Paper is produced part way through the 2005 Parliament, a subsequent edition will be prepared after its dissolution to create a full record of its MPs. The cut off date for the material in this edition is 31 March 2009. Please note that a new edition of this Research Paper is now available entitled: Members 1979-2010 [RP10/33] Oonagh Gay PARLIAMENT AND CONSTITUTION CENTRE HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 09/16 Saving Gateway Accounts Bill: Committee Stage Report 24.02.09 09/17 Autism Bill [Bill 10 of 2008-09] 25.02.09 09/18 Northern Ireland Bill [Bill 62 of 2008-09] 02.03.09 09/19 Small Business Rate Relief (Automatic Payment) Bill [Bill 13 of 03.03.09 2008-09] 09/20 Economic Indicators, March 2009 04.03.09 09/21 Statutory Redundancy Pay (Amendment) Bill [Bill 12 of 2008-09] 11.03.09 09/22 Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill [Bill 70 of 2008-09] 12.03.09 09/23 Welfare Reform Bill: Committee Stage Report 13.03.09 09/24 Royal Marriages and Succession to the Crown (Prevention of 17.03.09 Discrimination) Bill [Bill 29 of 2008-09] 09/25 Fuel Poverty Bill
    [Show full text]
  • The National Enterprise Board, Ferranti and Britain's Pre-History Of
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE “Breaking new ground”: The National Enterprise Board, Ferranti and Britain’s pre-history of privatization AUTHORS Billings, M; Wilson, J JOURNAL Enterprise and Society DEPOSITED IN ORE 15 March 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/36503 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication “Breaking new ground”: The National Enterprise Board, Ferranti and Britain’s Pre-history of Privatization Authors: Mark Billings (corresponding author), Senior Lecturer in Accounting and Business History, University of Exeter Business School, Streatham Court, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4PU, United Kingdom; tel: + 44 (0) 1392 722658; e-mail: [email protected]. Professor John Wilson, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Faculty of Business & Law, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne; e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Privatization is closely associated with the ideological turn to neoliberalism and regarded as a cornerstone of Britain’s “Thatcherite project”. Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government did not undertake its major privatizations of state-owned businesses until its second term began in 1983. We argue in this paper, however, that the 1980 disposal by the National Enterprise Board of its controlling interest in the engineering and electronics company Ferranti offers significant insights into the development of privatization policy and practice, as well as the changing role of the state in British business.
    [Show full text]
  • CABINET CONCLUSIONS April-December 1976
    THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTVS GOVERNMENT Copy No. 60 CABINET INDEX OF CABINET CONCLUSIONS April-December 1976 (CM (76) lst-43rd Meetings) Notes: References to CM (76) Minutes are shown ttaos-1 (1). References to CP (76) Memoranda are shown thus—CP 1. References in italics are to Memoranda not discussed by Cabinet. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTVS GOVERNMENT Copy No. 6 0 CABINET INDEX OF CABINET CONCLUSIONS April-December 1976 (CM (76) lst-43rd Meetings) Notes : References to CM (76) Minutes are shown thus—1 (1). References to CP (76) Memoranda are shown thus- CP 1. References inftaticg are to Memoranda net (Hscnned by Cabinet. SUBJECT INDEX (CM (76) lst-43rd Meetings) A ADMINISTRATION Change of administration: statement by the Prime Minister 1 (1). AIRCRAFT AND SHIPBUILDING See BILLS. ANGOLA Official observer attending the trial of the mercenaries in Luanda 8 (2). Unofficial group of British lawyers participating in the defence of the British mercenaries 10(3). BILLS Legislative Programme 1976-11: discussion of priorities of departments individual Bills CP 13 5 (1). AIRCRAFT AND SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRIES BILL Report Stage 7(1). Difficulties due to minority position, further proposals to be explored 10 (2). Proposed opposition motion before the debate to recommit the Bill to a Select Committee to be debated 28 June tl (1). Proposed timetable motion; arrangements for completion of Bill 15 (1) 20 (1). Trade Union recognition; report stage amendment by backbenchers. Amendment supporters to be told the general problem of recognition was being studied and proposals for a solution forthcoming 21 (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Director Recruitment Pack
    Recruitment pack Director Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Contents 5 About us Our mission is to help Job Description & people determine their 14 Person Specification place in the world and define their identities, so enhancing their 16 Working for us self-respect and their respect for others. 18 The North East Recruitment process 19 & next steps 3 About us Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums’ Strategic Board is looking to appoint a new Director to work with the Board and Leadership team to build on TWAM’s successes and to take the service forward. Like every organisation in the country TWAM has had an extraordinarily challenging year. Following the retirement of the present Director, Iain Watson, at the end of March 2021, the new Director will need to lead and develop new plans to steer TWAM through a period of great uncertainty and social change. In particular the new Director will respond to change work undertaken in TWAM during lockdown and will prepare the application to Arts Council for the next round of National Portfolio Organisation funding which is expected to be announced in late 2021. Subject to a successful application the Director will implement this plan from April 2023. A key part of the role is working with the 5 client organisations for which TWAM manages services: Gateshead Council, Newcastle City Council, North Tyneside Council, South Tyneside Council and Newcastle University. Newcastle City Council acts as the Lead Authority, and all TWAM employees are employees of the Council. Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums (TWAM) is a major regional museum, art gallery and archives service.
    [Show full text]