DOCSLIB.ORG

Department for Transport Powers of Entry Review: Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Department for Transport Department for Transport Powers of Entry Review: Final Report Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to section 42(1)(c) of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Department for Transport Powers of Entry Review: Final Report Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to section 42(1)(c) of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ or email [email protected] Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474102230 Web ISBN 9781474102247 Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P2638336 11/14 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Contents Introduction by the Secretary of State ................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 5 Powers of entry which are to be repealed/revoked ............................................... 7 Powers of entry to be retained with additional safeguards ................................ 11 Powers of entry to be retained but consolidated ................................................ 41 Powers of entry to be retained unchanged .......................................................... 44 Annex ...................................................................................................................... 86 3 Introduction by the Secretary of State The Government is committed to preserving the rights of individuals in their homes and businesses from unnecessary intrusion – this is a key element of respect for human rights. Our intention is clear: powers of entry must achieve the right balance between the need to enforce the law and ensure public protection and to provide sufficient safeguards and rights to the individual. The outcome of this review is that public authorities will have less extensive powers to enter people’s homes and the privacy and rights of homeowners and businesses will be protected and strengthened. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 was passed to ensure that this balanced approach is reflected in the day to day enforcement activities of public authorities. I am equally clear that the public are entitled to expect that stringent safety and security measures are in place in the sectors for which my Department is responsible, particularly for rail, aviation and maritime services. With these aims in mind this report sets out the outcome of the Department for Transport’s review of the 99 powers of entry in its area of responsibility and what action it proposes to take to remove those that are no longer needed and add safeguards to others. The Rt. Hon. Patrick McLoughlin MP Secretary of State for Transport November 2014 4 Executive Summary Under section 42 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 20121, each Minister of the Crown who is a member of the Cabinet must review relevant powers of entry and relevant associated powers for which the Minister is responsible with a view to deciding whether to make an order under section 39(1), 40 or 41 in relation to any of them. Each Minister must prepare a report of that review and lay a copy of the report before Parliament. Our approach The Department for Transport is responsible for a considerable number of powers of entry. Much of the statute law relating to transport has its origin in legislation dating from mid-19th to the mid-20th centuries. Policy officials and lawyers carried out a robust validation exercise to test the scope for removing powers of entry, consolidating them or adding safeguards. A number of themes emerged. Many of the powers in the transport field relate to security and safety and to maintaining transport infrastructure. The review concluded that many of these were justified and should be retained. In other cases particular powers were enacted for reasons other than security or safety, such as checks on record keeping, although they are sometimes sensibly grouped together with powers that are more directly related to security or safety. Poor record keeping, for instance, can have safety or security implications. A number of these powers allow entry to dwellings when this does not seem justified, or at least not justified without judicial authority. For example following the review it is proposed that entry to a dwelling for the purposes of investigating an air, sea or rail accident that has occurred should require a judicial warrant, unless this is likely to undermine the purpose of obtaining entry. Although the review has concluded that about two thirds of the current powers of entry will be retained, the Department does not consider that people will regard this as an intrusion into their civil liberties. Indeed the public rightly has very high expectations of government to protect them from harm in the field of transport. The risk of catastrophic failure if there are not stringent safety and security measures in place, particularly for rail, aviation and maritime services, means that the public will continue to support appropriate powers of entry to reduce that risk. They may, however, have a lower tolerance for powers of entry related to, say, issues around parking controls or minor environmental matters. The Department has reflected this level of public caution in proposing changes to security and safety measures (including accident investigation) in those sectors. Even where security and safety is not at risk, businesses generally support the effective enforcement of standards so as to prevent unscrupulous traders from undermining fair competition. In the interests of efficiency inspectors often carry out inspections at transport-related premises using a number of different powers which are designed to aid the 1 2012 c.9. 5 enforcement of different requirements applicable to the place of inspection. It is important that there is consistency in the different powers of entry – it would not make sense for one power of entry to have certain safeguards whereas another power of entry which will be used by the same inspector at the same premises to have a different set of safeguards. This may make consolidation of powers desirable, but could lead to complexity where the need remained to differentiate between different situations. The importance of consistency is particularly relevant to security regimes. It is relevant to the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency, for example, who often carry out a number of checks on the same premises at the same time. For instance, a check on records relating to drivers’ hours might be undermined by a requirement to seek a warrant if this resulted in the destruction of incriminating evidence, compromising road safety, but it would not be efficient to visit on a different occasion from one involving checks on other routine matters. Outcome This report sets out the results of the Department’s review of its powers of entry and where possible sets out what action will be taken. The table below sets out the number of powers of entry owned by the Department and a breakdown of action that will be or has been taken. Total powers of entry in scope of review 99 1. Total powers of entry to be repealed 5 2. Total powers of entry to be retained with additional safeguards 36 3. Total powers of entry to identified for consolidation 4 4. Total powers of entry to remain unchanged 54 Net Total 92 Next steps It is our aim to publish a consultation document setting out more detail about the powers of entry which the Department is proposing to amend. This will be made available on www.gov.uk/dft, setting out more clearly a timetable detailing when we will be able to begin making the proposed changes to the powers of entry listed. Action will be taken when resources permit. 6 Section 1 Powers of entry which are to be repealed/revoked Total powers of entry in scope of review 99 1. Total powers of entry to be repealed 5 2. Total powers of entry to be retained with additional safeguards 36 3. Total powers of entry identified for consolidation 4 4. Total powers of entry to remain unchanged 54 Net Total 92 1. The Land Powers (Defences) Act 1958, section 9(3) The Land Powers (Defences) Act 19582 terminates and substitutes certain emergency powers for the purposes of defence. The emergency powers relate to the use of land and sea for defence purposes. Section 9(3) of the Land Powers (Defences) Act 1958 gives a power of entry onto land for the purposes of survey, but it only applies in respect of orders made under section 15 of the Requisitioned Land and War Act 19453. In order to make an order under section 15, the land must have originally been stopped-up or diverted in exercise of emergency powers. There are powers in the Highways Act 19804 which could be used to stop-up or divert highways and the Department is not aware of the powers in section 15 having been exercised. It is therefore proposed to repeal this power of entry in due course, subject to further consultation with the Ministry of Defence. 2. International Road Haulage Permits Act 1975, section 1 The International Road Haulage Permits Act 19755 allows regulations to be made to require specified documentation to be carried in respect of lorries registered in the United Kingdom, trailers drawn by such lorries and other trailers within the United Kingdom on journeys which pass through the United Kingdom or which begin or end in the United Kingdom.
Recommended publications
  • The Bank Restriction Act and the Regime Shift to Paper Money, 1797-1821

    The Bank Restriction Act and the Regime Shift to Paper Money, 1797-1821

    European Historical Economics Society EHES WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMIC HISTORY | NO. 100 Danger to the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street? The Bank Restriction Act and the regime shift to paper money, 1797-1821 Patrick K. O’Brien Department of Economic History, London School of Economics Nuno Palma Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, University of Groningen JULY 2016 EHES Working Paper | No. 100 | July 2016 Danger to the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street? The Bank Restriction Act and the regime shift to paper money, 1797-1821* Patrick K. O’Brien Department of Economic History, London School of Economics Nuno Palma Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, University of Groningen Abstract The Bank Restriction Act of 1797 suspended the convertibility of the Bank of England's notes into gold. The current historical consensus is that the suspension was a result of the state's need to finance the war, France’s remonetization, a loss of confidence in the English country banks, and a run on the Bank of England’s reserves following a landing of French troops in Wales. We argue that while these factors help us understand the timing of the Restriction period, they cannot explain its success. We deploy new long-term data which leads us to a complementary explanation: the policy succeeded thanks to the reputation of the Bank of England, achieved through a century of prudential collaboration between the Bank and the Treasury. JEL classification: N13, N23, N43 Keywords: Bank of England, financial revolution, fiat money, money supply, monetary policy commitment, reputation, and time-consistency, regime shift, financial sector growth * We are grateful to Mark Dincecco, Rui Esteves, Alex Green, Marjolein 't Hart, Phillip Hoffman, Alejandra Irigoin, Richard Kleer, Kevin O’Rourke, Jaime Reis, Rebecca Simson, Albrecht Ritschl, Joan R.
  • British Overseas Territories Law

    British Overseas Territories Law

    British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
  • Government of Ireland Act, 1920. 10 & 11 Geo

    Government of Ireland Act, 1920. 10 & 11 Geo

    ?714 Government of Ireland Act, 1920. 10 & 11 GEo. 5. CH. 67.] To be returned to HMSO PC12C1 for Controller's Library Run No. E.1. Bin No. 0-5 01 Box No. Year. RANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. A.D. 1920. IUD - ESTABLISHMENT OF PARLIAMENTS FOR SOUTHERN IRELAND. AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND A COUNCIL OF IRELAND. Section. 1. Establishment of Parliaments of Southern and Northern Ireland. 2. Constitution of Council of Ireland. POWER TO ESTABLISH A PARLIAMENT FOR THE WHOLE OF IRELAND. Power to establish a Parliament for the whole of Ireland. LEGISLATIVE POWERS. 4. ,,.Legislative powers of Irish Parliaments. 5. Prohibition of -laws interfering with religious equality, taking property without compensation, &c. '6. Conflict of laws. 7. Powers of Council of Ireland to make orders respecting private Bill legislation for whole of Ireland. EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY. S. Executive powers. '.9. Reserved matters. 10. Powers of Council of Ireland. PROVISIONS AS TO PARLIAMENTS OF SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN IRELAND. 11. Summoning, &c., of Parliaments. 12. Royal assent to Bills. 13. Constitution of Senates. 14. Constitution of the Parliaments. 15. Application of election laws. a i [CH. 67.1 Government of Ireland Act, 1920, [10 & 11 CEo. A.D. 1920. Section. 16. Money Bills. 17. Disagreement between two Houses of Parliament of Southern Ireland or Parliament of Northern Ireland. LS. Privileges, qualifications, &c. of members of the Parlia- ments. IRISH REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. ,19. Representation of Ireland in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom. FINANCIAL PROVISIONS. 20. Establishment of Southern and Northern Irish Exchequers. 21. Powers of taxation. 22.
  • Statutory Instruments Revised May 2008

    Statutory Instruments Revised May 2008

    Factsheet L7 House of Commons Information Office Legislative Series Statutory Instruments Revised May 2008 Contents Introduction 2 Statutory Instruments 2 What is a Statutory Instrument? 2 Drafting 2 Preamble 2 This Factsheet has been archived so the Explanatory Notes 2 content and web links may be out of Explanatory Memoranda 3 date. Please visit our About Parliament Parliamentary procedure on SIs 3 pages for current information. Frequently used terms 3 Negative Procedure 4 Affirmative Procedure 5 Rejection of Statutory Instruments 5 Joint Committee on Statutory Statutory Instruments (SIs) are a form of Instruments 6 legislation which allow the provisions of an The Lords Committee on the Merits Act of Parliament to be subsequently of Statutory Instruments. 6 brought into force or altered without Debates on SIs in the House of Parliament having to pass a new Act. They Commons 7 are also referred to as secondary, delegated Delegated Legislation Committees 7 or subordinate legislation. This Factsheet Other types of delegated legislation 8 Regulatory Reform Orders 8 discusses the background to SIs, the Debates on Regulatory Reform procedural rules they must follow, and their Orders 9 parliamentary scrutiny. It also looks at the Remedial Orders 10 other types of delegated legislation. Commencement orders 10 Orders in Council 11 Orders of Council 11 Local SIs 11 Finding out about SIs 11 Publication and Bibliographic Control 12 Appendix A 13 Statistics on delegated legislation and deregulation orders 13 Appendix B 15 Comprehensive summary table of what can and cannot be presented or laid during recesses. 15 Further Reading 16 MayContact 2008 information 16 FSFeed No.backL7 Ed form 3.9 17 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2008 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission.
  • 12730 Analysis of Law in UK BRX:Layout 1

    12730 Analysis of Law in UK BRX:Layout 1

    Analysis of Law in the United Kingdom pertaining to Cross-Border Disaster Relief Prepared for the British Red Cross by The views expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the British Red Cross. This report is part of a wider study on cross-border disaster assistance within the EU, carried out in conjunction with five other European National Societies, under the overall co-ordination of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. The wider project received funding from the European Commission, who bear no responsibility for the content or use of the information contained in this report. Front cover photograph © Layton Thompson/British Red Cross Flood relief measures in Oxford, 25 July 2007 Analysis of Law in the United Kingdom pertaining to Cross-Border Disaster Relief Foreword The United Kingdom is in the fortunate position of Fisher (International Federation of Red Cross and Red being less susceptible to large-scale natural disasters Crescent Societies), Mr Tim Gordon (HMRC), Mr than many other countries. Even so, and as recent Gordon MacMillan (Hanover Associates UK), Mr Roy years have shown, our territory may still be subject to Wilshire (Chief Fire Officer, Hertfordshire County) such emergencies as flooding, and the effects of severe and Ms Moya Wood-Heath (British Red Cross). winter weather. We also wish to thank the authors of this report, The purpose of this study, commissioned by the British Justine Stefanelli and Sarah Williams of the British Red Cross, is to examine the extent to which the legal, Institute of International and Comparative Law, administrative and operational framework for disaster who were assisted by Katharine Everett, Frances response within the UK is able to facilitate potential McClenaghan, Hidenori Takai and Payam Yoseflavi.
  • Michael Nash, the Removal of Judges Under the Act of Settlement

    Michael Nash, the Removal of Judges Under the Act of Settlement

    PLEASE NOTE This is a draft paper only and should not be cited without the author’s express permission The Removal of Judges under the Act of Settlement (1701) Michael Nash This paper will consider the operation of the Act, the processes adopted, and the consequential outcomes. It is perhaps worth considering for a moment how important in consequence the Act was. And yet how little enthusiasm there was for it at the time, and how its passing was, in the words of Wellington later, “a damn near thing”. The Act only passed Parliament narrowly. It is said that it was carried by one vote only in Committee in the House of Commons. It is certain that the Act itself passed in the House of Commons “nemine contradicente” on May 14, 1701, but the Bill was but languidly supported. Many of the members, never more than 50 or 60 (out of a full house of 513) appear to have felt that the calling of a stranger to the throne was detestable, but the lesser of two evils. So the Bill was passed by 10% of the members. The passing of the Act is surrounded by myth, and records were then imperfectly kept, but Sir John Bowles, who introduced the Bill, was described as “a member of very little weight and authority”, who was even then thought to be disordered in his mind, and who eventually died mad! (1) Some of the great constitutional documents have been considered in a similar light: for example, the Second Reform Act in 1867. Smith, in a history of this Act, concludes that the bill survived “because a majority of the members of both Houses…dared not throw it out.
  • Buses: Deregulation in the 1980S

    Buses: Deregulation in the 1980S

    Buses: deregulation in the 1980s Standard Note: SN/BT/1534 Last updated: 18 June 2010 Author: Louise Butcher Section Business and Transport This note briefly summarises the bus policy of the Conservative Government in the 1980s, during which time bus services were deregulated (except in London) and bus companies were privatised. It covers services in England, Wales and Scotland. Information on other areas of bus policy such as concessionary fares, funding and grants and the policies of successive governments since 1997, can be found on the Buses Topical Page of the Parliament website. Contents 1 Background 2 2 England and Wales 2 2.1 Transport Act 1980 3 2.2 Transport Act 1985: deregulation 4 2.3 Transport Act 1985: privatisation 5 3 London 5 4 Scotland 6 5 After deregulation 6 This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public. 1 Background The regulation of passenger-carrying motor vehicles was introduced by the Road Traffic Act 1930.
  • Financial Services Bill Explanatory Notes

    Financial Services Bill Explanatory Notes

    FINANCIAL SERVICES BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Financial Services Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 21 October 2020 (Bill 200). ● These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by HM Treasury in order to assist the reader and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. ● These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. ● These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. Bill 200–EN 58/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill ............................................................................................ 5 Policy background............................................................................................... 5 Prudential regulation of credit institutions and investment firms .................................... 5 Investment Firms Prudential Regime 5 The Basel III Standards 7 Implementation of the Basel standards in the UK 8 Benchmarks .............................................................................................................................. 10 LIBOR transition 10 Extension of the transitional period for benchmarks with non-UK administrators 14 Access to Financial Services
  • Statutory Duties of Passenger Focus

    Statutory Duties of Passenger Focus

    NOTE ON DERIVATION OF STATUTORY DUTIES OF TRANSPORT FOCUS Transport Focus has been adopted as an operating name by the Passengers Council, but this title has no formal status in law. Accordingly, its legal name is used in this note. This note deals only with the primary representational and investigative role of the Council and omits all reference to its more specific duties vis-à-vis closures. For the sake of clarity, what are now the Council, the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) and the Secretary of State (SoS) are so described throughout, and references to their predecessor bodies in statutes predating their creation have been amended accordingly. References to regional committees which (apart from the London Transport Users Committee, operating as London TravelWatch) no longer exist have been omitted, as have references to the ORR/Franchising Director/ Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) where these have been subsequently repealed. Extensions to the Council’s jurisdiction contained in legislation authorising construction of the Channel Tunnel are disregarded. Subsequent amendments (including those referred to in the chronological summary below) are incorporated in the text of the measures to which they were applied, without specific identification. Passages not relevant to the Council’s duties (e.g. relating to its composition and administration) are omitted, in consequence of which the numbering of sections and sub- sections may be discontinuous. 1 CHRONOLOGICAL SUMMARY Transport Act 1962 This Act abolished the British Transport Commission and transferred its functions to a number of Boards, of which two now survive : the British Railways Board (BRB) (in name only) and the British Waterways Board (BWB).
  • Statutory Instrument Practice

    Statutory Instrument Practice

    Statutory Instrument Practice A guide to help you prepare and publish Statutory Instruments and understand the Parliamentary procedures relating to them - 5th edition (November 2017) Statutory Instrument Practice Page i Statutory Instrument Practice is published by The National Archives © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: [email protected]. Statutory Instrument Practice Page ii Preface This is the fifth edition of Statutory Instrument Practice (SIP) and replaces the edition published in November 2006. This edition has been prepared by the Legislation Services team at The National Archives. We will contact you regularly to make sure that this guide continues to meet your needs, and remains accurate. If you would like to suggest additional changes to us, please email them to the SI Registrar. Thank you to all of the contributors who helped us to update this edition. You can download SIP from: https://publishing.legislation.gov.uk/tools/uksi/si-drafting/si- practice. November 2017 Statutory Instrument Practice Page iii Contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................. 3 CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 4 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................
  • Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970

    Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970

    Public Administration Research; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2017 ISSN 1927-517x E-ISSN 1927-5188 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Modernising English Criminal Legislation 1267-1970 Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 2, 2017 Accepted: April 19, 2017 Online Published: April 27, 2017 doi:10.5539/par.v6n1p53 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/par.v6n1p53 1. INTRODUCTION English criminal - and criminal procedure - legislation is in a parlous state. Presently, there are some 286 Acts covering criminal law and criminal procedure with the former comprising c.155 Acts. Therefore, it is unsurprising that Judge CJ, in his book, The Safest Shield (2015), described the current volume of criminal legislation as 'suffocating'. 1 If one considers all legislation extant from 1267 - 1925 (see Appendix A) a considerable quantity comprises criminal law and criminal procedure - most of which is (likely) obsolete.2 Given this, the purpose of this article is to look at criminal legislation in the period 1267-1970 as well as criminal procedure legislation in the period 1267-1925. Its conclusions are simple: (a) the Law Commission should review all criminal legislation pre-1890 as well as a few pieces thereafter (see Appendix B). It should also review (likely) obsolete common law crimes (see Appendix C); (b) at the same time, the Ministry of Justice (or Home Office) should consolidate all criminal legislation post-1890 into 4 Crime Acts.3 These should deal with: (a) Sex crimes; (b) Public order crimes; (c) Crimes against the person; (d) Property and financial crimes (see 7).
  • Transport Act 1968

    Transport Act 1968

    Status: Point in time view as at 01/07/1992. This version of this Act contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Transport Act 1968. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Transport Act 1968 1968 CHAPTER 73 An Act to make further provision with respect to transport and related matters. [25th October 1968] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Power to amend and repeal conferred by Transport (Scotland) Act 1989 (c. 23, SIF 126), s. 14(3)(d) C2 Act excluded by Transport Act 1981 (c. 56, SIF 126), Sch. 4 Pt. I para. 2(1)(3) C3 Provisions of the Act requiring transport managers for operating centres for authorised vehicles under goods vehicle operator's licences repealed (E.W.) by Transport Act 1982 (c. 49, SIF 126), Sch. 5 para. 6 C4 This Act is not necessarily in the form in which it has effect in Northern Ireland C5 Act modified (1.6.1993) by S.I. 1993/1119, regs. 3, 4(1), Sch. 1 (as amended (2.7.2012) by S.I. 2012/1659, Sch. 3 para. 32(3) (with arts. 4-6)) Act modified (1.6.1993) by S.I. 1993/1119, regs. 3, 4(2), Sch. 2 Act: power to apply conferred (S.) (4.1.1995) by 1994 c. 39, s. 40, Sch. 5 Pt.