DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigating Allah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigating Allah INVESTIGATING ALLAH ============================= About the Author … Contents Introduction Presentation of the situation Investigation and Analysis: Theological Perspective 1: Linguestic Perspective 2: Demonological Perspective 3: Historical Perspective 4: Biblical Perspective 5: Reasons why we oppose the use of Allah as name for Yahweh God Conclusion Suggested readings Questions and Answers * * * * * * * * Allah is the name of the Muslim god and according to Islam, the same god of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Many comparative religious scholars have assumed that because Islam claimed that he is the same god as the Biblical god, that there is no reason to investigate the origin of him. There has been much archeological study and religious investigation upon the claim of whether Allah is the same god of the Bible. This book by Al Gharib is an excellent study for any religious student interested in learning how both Christianity and Islam view the name of Allah. This book clearly shows that it is unscholarly, logically flawed and religiously deceitful to promote Allah, as Muslims want him to be promoted without doing an in-depth study of the previous religions of Judaism and Christianity. Muslims expect you to learn about Islam from the Muslim point of view, however they also want make you learn Christianity and Judaism from this same point of view. This isn't how religions are studied And after reading this book, you will have a totally different view on Allah and how historically, biblically, and logically his interrelation in religious history. Is Allah actually the same god of the Bible? Does the name of God change? According to previous religions that Islam claims to confirm, is it okay to call god whatever name you want, hence Baal, Zeus, etc? This book clearly addresses all of these subjects along with given a detailed linguistic anylazation of the name Allah and its relationship to the word "God". It is historically accurate and welled researched. Over 5 years of preparation was put into this 1st edition and the author is both multilingual and virtually an expert in Arab linguistics. Everything about Allah has always seemed to be taken from a Muslim point of view; However what does history and Non-Muslim evidence show about Allah? Read and find out. ----Mr. Gale Introduction Hos.4:6; Isa.2:6; Jer.11:13; Zep.1:4-5; Eze.44:23; Joh.8:32; Hos.2:16 Hos.4:6My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge Isa.2:6. They are full of superstitions from the East; they practice divination like the Philistines and clasp hands with pagans. Jer.11:13 The altars you have set up to burn incense to that shameful god Baal are as many as the streets of Jerusalem. Zep.1:4-5 I will cut off from this place every remnant of Baal, the names of the pagan and the idolatrous priests, those who bow down in the roofs to worship the starry hosts, those who bow down and swear by Molech Eze.44:23… And they (the faithful priests) will teach my people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean. Joh.8:32And you will know the truth and the truth will set you free. On that day, you will call me Ishi, not anymore Baali, says Yahweh. ( N.I.V) Biblical names and attributes, especially when they are used for the Creator and Author of the Scriptures, they are just coincidences but terms that have originally been very well and carefully selected to reveal to us the portray of Him in the most possibly accurate and clear statement…. Presentation of the Situation When Christians started spreading toward the four corners of the earth and preaching the Gospel to various people, nations, and languages, one of the greatest challenges that faced them is the translation of God's name, Yahweh Elohiym. In fact till this present day, the matter is still causing the Church many controversies and even division. One of those critical and hot cases is regarding the name Allah, the name widely used among the Arabs and the Muslims for the divine. Thus, the Christian Church has separated itself into three main approaches. Each approach has its own arguments to defend its position and also to discredit the others. The three main approaches: Approach-A, Liberals: Allah and the God of the Bible are basically the same, except that pagan Arabs and Muslims who followed him see the same divine but from a different perspective due to their traditions and belief system. The following are two types of general comments they usually use: 1- The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume I, R. Butin (Roman Catholics) Allah is the name of God in Arabic. It is a compound word from the article, 'al, and ilah, divinity, and signifies "the-god" par excellence. This form of the divine name is in itself a sure proof that ilah was at one time an appellative, common to all the local and tribal gods. Gradually, with the addition of the article, it was restricted to one of them who took precedence of the others; finally, with the triumph of monotheism (Islam), He was recognized as the only true God… It is certain, however, that before the time of Mohammed, owing to their contact with Jews and Christians, the Arabs were generally monotheists. The notion of Allah in Arabic theology is substantially the same as that of God among the Jews, and also among the Christians, with the exception of the Trinity (Q.112). Let it be noted that although Allah is an Arabic term,(but) it is used by all Moslems, whatever be their language, as the name of God. 2- Answering Islam.org, Jochen Katz (Ecumenical Evangelical) The God (Allah) the Qur'an talks about is the same. And Muslims do worship this one and only Creator God. The question is not whether Muslims and Christians have the same God [there is only one Creator after all]… This posting was only to make clear that the God of the Qur'an and of the Bible can be the same and obviously are the same, yet nevertheless it can be true that one is true revelation while the other is not. Hearing a different description of God by Christians and Muslims, some come to the conclusion you must be talking about different entities and that is understandable. Others come to the conclusion that the entity is the same [because there is only one Creator God - and both agree that there is only one and hence they talk about this same one] but because of the differences one of them must have false information. At least SOME false information even though much of it is the same and probably true information. This approach represents the majority of Christians, mainly the professing Christians, who belong to traditional churches, i.e. the Roman Catholics and also to the Ecumenical Evangelicals besides the Christian cults i.e. the New Age movement and the Masons. They emphasize the similarities between Allah and Yahweh, but they disregard the huge differences and dismiss the contradictions. From their prospective, as we have seen in the above arguments, Allah must be the true God since it is given attributes like creator, supreme, etc. They often do the same to other gods i.e. Buddha and Brahman. Approach-B, Moderates: The god of the Quran and the God of the Bible are totally two different gods, but both of them share in the same Arabic generic name, speculatively and based on assumptions, is the term Allah. Answering Islam.org, Sam Shamoun (Middle Eastern Evangelical Christian) A brief examination of Allah as presented in the Quran leads us to conclude that he cannot possibly be the same God worshiped by Abraham and as described in the Holy Bible. The contradictions in attributes and nature between Yahweh and Allah are too numerous to pass over, and cannot be reconciled. We are well aware that the name Allah is used by Arab speaking Christians for the God of the Bible… As such, the Holy Bible uses the term as just one of the many titles for Yahweh, the only true God. Yet the problem arises from the fact that Muslims insist that Allah is not a title, but the personal name of the God of Islam. This becomes problematic since according to the Holy Bible the name of the God of Abraham is Yahweh/Jehovah, not Allah: God spoke further to Moses and said to him, "I am the LORD (YHWH) and I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as God Almighty; BUT BY MY NAME, YHWH, I did not make myself known to them." Exo.6:2-3. Therefore, Christians can use Allah as a title but not as the personal name for the God of the Bible. Many Evangelical Christians, especially those working among the Muslims and also the traditional Arab Christians, hold into this approach and use of the name Allah, thus only as a generic name for God. They insist in using the name because they believe that it was originally introduced to the Arabs by the Bible believers and long before Muhammad made it the official name of his god. Most of those Christians reject Muhammad's version of Allah and consider and consider his god as a false one and an imitation. Approach-C, Conservatives: The name Allah originates from paganism and became the official name of the false god of Muhammad, therefore it should not be associated with the God of the Bible. Let Us Reason Ministries.org, (Conservative Evangelical group) Allah is the name of the only God in Islam.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Veda Vs. Tetragrammaton: Decrypting the Greatest © 2017 IJSR Enigma in History Received: 08-11-2016 Accepted: 09-12-2016 Milorad Ivankovic
    International Journal of Sanskrit Research 2017; 3(1): 21-25 International Journal of Sanskrit Research2015; 1(3):07-12 ISSN: 2394-7519 IJSR 2017; 3(1): 21-25 Veda vs. Tetragrammaton: Decrypting the greatest © 2017 IJSR www.anantaajournal.com Enigma in History Received: 08-11-2016 Accepted: 09-12-2016 Milorad Ivankovic Milorad Ivankovic Omladinski trg 6/4, SRB-26300 Abstract Vrsac, Serbia Since times immemorial man`s experience and perception of the world have been encoded by and stored primarily in the words of human language. Thus, neither genetic DNA analysis nor archeological artifacts, but only the words of human language can decode the true history and evolution of man, his beliefs, religious ideas and philosophical concepts. The collection of Sanskrit texts called the Veda or the Vedas being the most comprehensive source of authentic ancient knowledge, it provides the missing clues for deciphering enigmas and mysteries of the bygone eras, of which the greatest is known as the Tetragrammaton. Key Words: YHWH, heaven, aśman, šamayim, Dyava, Yava, Iove Introduction In Hebrew tradition the proper name of god has been mystified by the four letters YHWH called the Tetragrammaton, due to the ancient Hamito-Semitic custom of recording only consonant sounds in writing, which presents the main difficulty in decoding its authentic spelling. The Revelation of Tetragrammaton According to the Book of Exodus 3: 14, God allegedly introduced himself to Moses by the phrase `ehyeh ’ašer ’ehyeh which means “I AM WHO I AM” and afterwards revealed his proper name “I appeared unto Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as God šadday but by my name YHWH I made me not known to them“ (Exodus 6:3).
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Status of the Human Right to Freedom of Religion Or Belief
    Inquiry into the status of the Human Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief Submission: Inquiry into the status of the human right to freedom of religion or belief This purpose of this submission is to raise the committee’s awareness that Islam: - militates against “the enjoyment of freedom of religion or belief” - incites to “violations or abuses” of religious freedom - is antithetical and inimical to the “protection and promotion of freedom of religion or belief” Any inquiry into “the human right to freedom of religion or belief” which avoids examining arguably the largest global threat to those freedoms would be abdicating its responsibility to fully inform its stakeholders. Whether it is the nine Islamic countries in the top ten of the World Watch List of Christian Persecution(1), crucifix-wearing “Christians in Sydney fac(ing) growing persecution at the hands of Muslim gangs”(2) or the summary execution of those who blaspheme or apostatise(3), Islam, in practice and in doctrine, militates against “the human right to freedom of religion or belief”. The purpose of this submission is not to illustrate “the nature and extent of (Islamic) violations and abuses of this right” [which are well-documented elsewhere(4)] but to draw the committee’s attention to the Islamic doctrinal “causes of those violations or abuses”. An informed understanding of Islam is crucial to effectively addressing potential future conflicts between Islamic teachings which impact negatively on “freedom of religion or belief” and those Western freedoms we had almost come to take for granted, until Islam came along to remind us that they must be ever fought for.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoroastrian Ethics by MA Buch
    The Gnekwad Stu<Uc'^ in Rdi/tuii and Plcilu-^oph i/ : /I ZOKOASTRIAN ETHICS IVintod at the Mirfsion Press, Siirat l.y n. K. 8colt, and imblislieil l»y A. G. Wi(l;.'ery the Collej,'e, Baroda. I. V. 1919. ZOROASTHIAN ETHICS By MAGAXLAL A. BUCH, M. A. Fellow of the Seminar for the Comparative Stn<ly of IJelifjioiiP, Barotla, With an Infrnrhicfion hv ALBAN n. WrDGERY, ^f. A. Professor of Philosophy and of the Comparative Study of PiPlii^doiis, Baroda. B A K D A 515604 P n E F A C E The present small volume was undertaken as one subject of study as Fellow in the Seminar for the Comparative Study of Religions established in the College, Baroda, by His Highness the Maharaja Sayaji Eao Gaekwad, K C. S. I. etc. The subject was suggested by Professor Widgery who also guided the author in the plan and in the general working out of the theme. It is his hope that companion volumes on the ethical ideas associated with other religions will shortly be undertaken. Such ethical studies form an important part of the aim which His Highness had in view in establishing the Seminar. The chapter which treats of the religious conceptions is less elaborate than it might well have been, because Dr. Dhalla's masterly volume on Zomasfrirm Theolof/y^ New York, 1914, cannot be dispens- ed with by any genuine student of Zoroastrian- ism, and all important details may be learned from it. It only remains to thank I'rotessor Widgcrv lor writinf,' a L;enoral introduotion and for his continued help thronghont tho process of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of God (Allah) in Islam Abdulkareem Ahmad Tijjani, Ph.D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL BENCHMARK (IJEB), eISSN: Benchmark Journals 2489-0170pISSN:2489-4162 University of Uyo The Concept of God (Allah) in Islam Abdulkareem Ahmad Tijjani, Ph.D Department of Islamic Studies Federal College of Education, Kano Abstract Believing in God (Allah) is the Central focus of all religions. The concept of God of each religion provides the distinguishing difference between one religion and the other. In this paper, attempt is made to present the concept of God in Islam. The pillars of Islam, the articles of faith, and the confession of faith are succinctly presented. Its significance lies in identifying the conception and characteristics of God – Allah in Islam.These features differentiate Islamic monotheism from the doctrines of God in other religions. Keywords: Allah, Al-Tawhid, Articles of Faith, Al-Ghayb, the Kalimah Introduction The teachings of Islam could be categorized into two parts; the theoretical aspects which deal with the belief system of Islam, and the practical aspects which deal with the rituals such as prayer, zakat, fasting, jihad, etc. The theoretical aspects of Islam is the pivot around which the Islamic concept of God revolves. It centres on the belief in ‘al-Tawhid’ i.e. the oneness of Allah, and the articles of faith. The belief system of Islam is called usul-al- din. The word usul is the plural of asl which means a root or a principle. The practical aspects which is called ahkam, means, the ordinances and regulations of Islam. These aspects are referred to in the glorious Qur’an as Iman and Amal, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis of Marsiya-E-Hussain
    Religious Ideology and Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Marsiya-e-Hussain Snobra Rizwan Lecturer, Department of English Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Pakistan Tariq Saeed Assisstant Professor, Department of English Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Pakistan Ramna Fayyaz Lecturer, Department of English Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Pakistan ABSTRACT This paper employs Fairclough’s framework of critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 2001; 2003) as a research tool to demonstrate how mourning discourse of marsiya manages to win favourite responses from Pakistani audiences by foregrounding certain linguistic conventions. The data comprising popular marsiyas are based on responses obtained through a small-scale survey and are analyzed from the perspective of ideology and emotive appeal embedded in discourse. The analysis illustrates that discourse conventions of marsiya—in addition to traditional commemoration of martyrdom of Imam Hussian—serve to elaborate, explain and disseminate religious doctrines in Pakistani Shi‘ah masses. Keywords: Marsiya, Critical Discourse Analysis, Ideology, Shiism 1. Introduction This paper provides a close study to examine the distinguishing features of marsiya-e-Hussain and the way discursive choices of certain transitivity features, figurative language and lyrical conventions serve to make it a distinct poetic genre of its own. Though marsiya recitation is taken to be a means of commemorating the martyrdom of Imam Hussain; nevertheless, it means much more to Shi’ia community. Along with other mourning rituals, marsiya is considered to be a means of seeking waseela (mediation) from the saints, teaching and learning religious ideologies, seeking God’s pleasure and so on (‘Azadari; mourning for Imam Hussain’, 2009). All these objectives are achieved by following certain discourse conventions which in turn construct certain discursive reality and weigh heavily on the formation of distinctive opinion and religious ideology in Shi‘ah masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus and the Divine Name R
    47 Jesus and the Divine Name R. Kendall Soulen Whoever has the word of Jesus for a true possession can also hear his silence. —Ignatius of Antioch 15:2 In his estimable work Not Every Spirit: A Dogmatics of Christian Disbelief, Christopher Morse wisely observes that in the biblical context God’s name is understood to be communicated by God. God’s name “is revealed as a proper and not a generic name or an appellation chosen by human preference.”1 He goes on to elaborate: According to ancient tradition in Genesis the names of creatures are chosen by human selection: “whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name” (Gen. 2:19). Not so with the name of God. So sacred is this name in Hebraic tradition that it is not spoken. Another word, “LORD” (Adonai), is substituted in its place wherever the original appears.” In this essay, I want to explore the scriptural dynamics of God’s self-commu- nicated name with special attention to what is no doubt a simple but nevertheless important and often overlooked fact. The practice of honoring the divine name by avoiding its use is not only a Jewish tradition, as Morse rightly observes, but a Christian one as well. I offer these reflections in token of my great esteem for Christopher Morse as a theologian of the church and in gratitude for his unfailing friendship and generosity. By way of introduction, let me call to mind a bit of theological tradition and ask a question about it. The tradition is this.
    [Show full text]
  • God Among the Gods: an Analysis of the Function of Yahweh in the Divine Council of Deuteronomy 32 and Psalm 82
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AND GRADUATE SCHOOL GOD AMONG THE GODS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTION OF YAHWEH IN THE DIVINE COUNCIL OF DEUTERONOMY 32 AND PSALM 82 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF RELIGION IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGIOUS STUDIES BY DANIEL PORTER LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA MAY 2010 The views expressed in this thesis do not necessarily represent the views of the institution and/or of the thesis readers. Copyright © 2010 by Daniel Porter All Rights Reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my wife, Mariel And My Parents, The Rev. Fred A. Porter and Drenda Porter Special thanks to Dr. Ed Hindson and Dr. Al Fuhr for their direction and advice through the course of this project. iii ABSTRACT The importance of the Ugaritic texts discovered in 1929 to ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Studies is one of constant debate. The Ugaritic texts offer a window into the cosmology that shaped the ancient Near East and Semitic religions. One of the profound concepts is the idea of a divine council and its function in maintaining order in the cosmos. Over this council sits a high god identified as El in the Ugaritic texts whose divine function is to maintain order in the divine realm as well on earth. Due to Ugarit‟s involvement in the ancient world and the text‟s representation of Canaanite cosmology, scholars have argued that the Ugaritic pantheon is evidenced in the Hebrew Bible where Yahweh appears in conjunction with other divine beings. Drawing on imagery from both the Ugaritic and Hebrew texts, scholars argue that Yahweh was not originally the high god of Israel, and the idea of “Yahweh alone” was a progression throughout the biblical record.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is “Allah”? by Rick Brown
    Sharing the Message “with Courtesy and Respect” (I Peter 3:15) Who is “Allah”? by Rick Brown he rise of Islamist terrorism has outraged people across the world. Many Christians have directed their anger, not simply towards T militant Islamists, but towards Muslims in general and towards Islam in particular. (Most Muslims, on the other hand, direct their anger sensibly towards the Islamist terrorists themselves rather than against the whole Muslim community.) Much of the anger expressed in the West has taken the form of demonizing the Islamic religion, to the extent of accusing Muslims of worshiping a demon. A key element of this attack has been the claim of some that the name Allah refers to a demon or at least a pagan deity, notably the so-called “moon god.” Such claims have even been made by scholars who are reputable in their own fields but who are poorly acquainted with the Arabic language and Middle-Eastern history. The Kingdom of God, however, is never advanced by being untruthful, so this matter bears further investigation. Moon God? Those who claim that Allah is a pagan deity, most notably the moon god, often base their claims on the fact that a symbol of the crescent moon adorns the tops of many mosques and is widely used as a symbol of Islam. It is in fact true that before the coming of Islam many “gods” and idols were worshiped in the Middle East, but the name of the moon god was Sîn, not Allah, and he was not particularly popular in Arabia, the birthplace of Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Daughters of Allah?
    WHO WERE THE DAUGHTERS OF ALLAH? By DONNA RANDSALU B.A., University of British Columbia,1982. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (RELIGIOUS STUDIES) We accept this thesis—as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September 1988 © Donna Kristin Randsalu, 1988 V In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of £gLlfr/OU^ £TUO>eS> The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date Per- n} DE-6(3/81) ABSTRACT Who were the Daughters of Allah, the three Arabian goddesses mentioned in the Qur'an and venerated by the pagan Arabs prior to the rise of Islam, and who since have vanished into obscurity? Can we reconstruct information about these goddesses by reference to earlier goddesses of the Near East? It is our intention to explore this possibility through an examination of their predecessors in view of the links between the Fertile Crescent and the Arabian Peninsula. Moving back in time from the seventh century A.D. (Arabia) through the Hellenistic Period (Syro/Phoenicia 300 B.C.-A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Yahweh Among the Baals: Israel and the Storm Gods
    Chapter 9 Yahweh among the Baals: Israel and the Storm Gods Daniel E. Fleming What would Baal do without Mark Stratton Smith to preserve and respect his memory in a monotheistic world determined to exclude and excoriate him? The very name evokes idolatry, and an alternative to the true God aptly called pagan. Yet Baal is “The Lord,” a perfectly serviceable monotheistic title when rendered by the Hebrew ʾādôn or the Greek kurios. Biblical writers managed to let Yahweh and El “converge” into one, with Elohim (God) the common ex- pression, but Baal could not join the convergence, even if Psalm 29 could have Yahweh thunder as storm god. Mark has had much to say about the religion of Israel and its world, and we need not assume Baal to be his favorite, but per- haps Mark’s deep familiarity with Baal suits an analysis of Israel that embraces what the Bible treats as taboo. For this occasion, it is a privilege to contribute a reflection on God’s “early history” in his footsteps, to honor his work, in ap- preciation of our friendship. In the Ugaritic Baal Cycle, a text so familiar to Mark that visitors may per- haps need his letter of reference for entry, Baal is the special title of Hadad, the young warrior god of rain and tempest (Smith 1994; Smith and Pitard 2009). Although El could converge with Yahweh and Baal could never name him, gen- erations of scholars have identified Yahweh first of all with the storm (van der Toorn 1999; Müller 2008). Yahweh and Haddu, or Hadad, were never one, but where Yahweh could be understood to originate in the lands south of Israel, as in Seir and Edom of Judges 5:4–5, he could be a storm god nonetheless: (4) Yahweh, when you went out from Seir, when you walked from the open country of Edom, the earth quivered, as the heavens dripped, as the clouds dripped water.
    [Show full text]
  • Bible Studies • Біблійні Студії
    Bible Studies • Біблійні студії PAVLOS D. VASILEIADIS The Pronunciation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki of the Sacred Tetragrammaton: Greece An Overview of a Nomen Revelatus [email protected] that Became a Nomen Absconditus Prologue The name of the God of the Bible is instrumental in understanding His identity. The Hebrew “quadriliteral” term , can be located in the core of almost every theological attempt to describe the biblical notion of God — either Jewish or Christian.2 For centuries, this sacred name was met with only in Semit- ic contexts. But during the Hellenistic period, a crucial meeting between Hebrew and Greek cultures happened. There came a fundamental shift in the understanding of the identity of the God who bears this name and, consequently, of the meaning attribut- ed to his name. Judaism moved from the biblically active “becoming,” as a covenan- tal God who seeks to get in close relation with faithful humans, to the philosophically static “being,” more akin to the Platonic view of God as immutable and utterly trans- cendent. A result of this development was that the divine name gradually became a ta- boo to the Jews. It may have started as reverence but it ended up as a long-lasting super- stition. Since the Tetragrammaton became ineffable, the exact ancient pronunciation was thought to be lost or restricted to a few initiates. Philo, a contemporary of Jesus and the apostle Paul, was the first to describe God as “unnameable,” “unutterable,” and completely incomprehensible.3 The Tetragrammaton — a name that appears more than 6, times in the Hebrew Bible — was replaced by various circumlocutions, like “the Name” or “the Holy One.” Copies of the Greek LXX Bible made early in the Chris- tian era had their text quickly overwhelmed by substitute titles like “Lord” and “God” in place of God’s name.
    [Show full text]
  • Soul and Soil
    Soul and Soil GEORGIA HALLIDAY samgrahah: he who holds everything together The Lord of the Universe and Professor Godbole stand at “opposite ends of the same strip of carpet” ( Passage 283). The room is full of “coloured rags, iridescent balls, chandeliers of opaque pink glass, and murky photo - graphs framed crookedly”; of effigies; of mild-featured Hindu men; school - boys; jasmine garlands; musics, multiple and indeterminate; an altar covered in rose leaves, golden tablets, silver dishes; a banana tree (283). God will be born at midnight—although he was born hundreds of years ago—although he will never be born. Sri Krishna, the Lord of the Universe, just like the music that fills the air with vibrations from choirs, cymbals, hand drums, a harmonium, the thumping of an electric generator, a Europeanized band playing a waltz in the courtyard, and elderly Brahmans singing a hymn, is multiple and indeterminate. The poets of the State have written inscriptions and hung them about the room “where they could not be read” (285). But evidently someone has read them, because we are shortly informed that one of them is in English “to indicate His universality,” and that a mistake on the part of the draughtsman has resulted in the inscription reading “God si love” (285). We are then treated to this sentence, set apart in its own paragraph: “God si love. Is this the first message of India?” And then the choir starts to sing again: “Tukaram, tukaram, thou art my father and mother and everybody” and mothers squabble over the children and the band in the courtyard plays “Nights of Gladness” and someone breaks cordon in an effort to get closer to the silver icon of Sri Krishna and Professor Godbole attempts to untangle his pince-nez from the jasmine gar - land around his neck (283).
    [Show full text]