DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Approved Historic Sites PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND and Districts Plan June 2010 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission www.mncppc.org/pgco Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan June 2010 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George’s County Planning Department 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive, Upper Marlboro, MD www.mncppc.org/pgco Abstract TITLE: Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan AUTHOR: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George’s County Planning Department SUBJECT: Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan for Prince George’s County DATE: June 2010 SOURCE OF COPIES: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 14741 Governor Oden Bowie Drive Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 SERIES NUMBER: 9570952405 NUMBER OF PAGES: 306 ABSTRACT: This ocumentd is the Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan for Prince George’s County. Policy guidance for this plan came from the 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan. The approved plan updates the 1992 Historic Sites and Districts Plan by including additions to historic sites and resources and a set of goals, policies, and strategies to guide future preservation planning efforts. The plan also contains an initial set of implementation priorities and a proposal for a strategic plan of implementation. Appendices provide updated county and community histories; a summary of historic themes; and lists of cemeteries, organizations, and sources of additional information. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Royce Hanson, Chairman Samuel J. Parker, Jr., Vice Chairman Offi cers Patricia Colihan Barney, Executive Director Al Warfi eld, Acting Secretary-Treasurer Adrian R. Gardner, Esq., General Counsel Th e Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bicounty agency, created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. Th e Commission’s geographic authority extends to the great majority of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties: the Maryland-Washington Regional District (M-NCPPC planning jurisdiction) comprises 1,001 square miles, while the Metropolitan District (parks) comprises 919 square miles, in the two counties. Th e Commission has three major functions: • Th e preparation, adoption, and, from time to time, amendment or extension of the General Plan for the physical development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District; • Th e acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of a public park system; and • In Prince George’s County only, the operation of the entire county public recreation program. Th e Commission operates in each county through a Planning Board appointed by and responsible to the county government. All local plans, recommendations on zoning amendments, administration of subdivision regulations, and general administration of parks are responsibilities of the Planning Boards. Th e Prince George’s County Department of Planning (M-NCPPC): • Our mission is to help preserve, protect and manage the county’s resources by providing the highest quality planning services and growth management guidance and by facilitating eff ective intergovernmental and citizen involvement through education and technical assistance. • Our vision is to be a model planning department of responsive and respected staff who provide superior planning and technical services and work cooperatively with decision makers, citizens and other agencies to continuously improve development quality and the environment and act as a catalyst for positive change. Prince George’s County Planning Board Montgomery County Planning Board Samuel J. Parker, Jr., Chairman Royce Hanson, Chairman Sylvester J. Vaughns, Vice Chairman Marye Wells-Harley, Vice Chairman Sarah A. Cavitt Joseph Alfandre Jesse Clark Norman Dreyfuss John H. Squire Amy Presley ii Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan Prince George’s County Jack B. Johnson, County Executive County Council Th e County Council has three main responsibilities in the planning process: (1) setting policy, (2) plan approval, and (3) plan implementation. Applicable policies are incorporated into area plans, functional plans, and the general plan. Th e Council, after holding a hearing on the plan adopted by the Planning Board, may approve the plan as adopted, approve the plan with amendments based on the public record, or disapprove the plan and return it to the Planning Board for revision. Implementation is primarily through adoption of the annual Capital Improvement Program, the annual Budget, the water and sewer plan, and adoption of zoning map amendments. Council Members Th omas E. Dernoga, 1st District, Council Chairman Will Campos, 2nd District Eric Olson, 3rd District Ingrid M. Turner, 4th District Andrea Harrison, 5th District, Council Vice Chair Samuel H. Dean, 6th District Camille Exum, 7th District Tony Knotts, 8th District Marilynn M. Bland, 9th District Clerk of the Council Redis C. Floyd Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan iii Table of Contents PLAN HIGHLIGHTS 1 CHAPTER 5 HISTORIC Purpose 1 PRESERVATION REGULATIONS 41 Plan Highlights 1 Background 41 Inventory Additions 2 Issues 41 Other Inventory Changes 5 Goal 42 PART ONE: BACKGROUND 9 CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS 45 Background 45 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 11 Issues 46 Public Participation Process 11 Goal 46 Consistency with Other Plans 12 General Plan Context 13 CHAPTER 7 PROTECTION OF CEMETERIES 49 Existing Preservation Framework 14 Background 49 Certifi ed Local Government Program 15 Regulations 51 Highlights of Implementation of the 1992 Issues 51 Historic Sites and Districts Plan Proposals 15 Goal 52 CHAPTER 2 HERITAGE THEMES 17 CHAPTER 8 PLANNING FOR ARCHEOLOGY 55 Introduction 17 Background 55 Prehistoric and Seventeenth Century Period 17 Issues 58 Th e Eighteenth Century and the Goal 59 Antebellum Period 17 CHAPTER 9 CULTURAL Commerce, Industry, and LANDSCAPE PRESERVATION 63 Scientifi c Advancements 19 Background 63 Transportation 20 Issues 64 Political and Social History, Religion, Goal 65 Recreation and Th e Arts 21 Civil Society 22 CHAPTER 10 HISTORIC Th e Twentieth Century 23 PRESERVATION INCENTIVES 67 Ecclesiastical and Residential Architecture 24 Background 67 Current Incentives 67 PART TWO: GOALS 27 Goal 70 CHAPTER 3 EVALUATION AND DESIGNATION 29 CHAPTER 11 NEIGHBORHOOD AND Background 29 COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION 73 Issues 31 Background 73 Goal 33 Issues 73 Planning and Implementation Tools CHAPTER 4 PRESERVATION PLANNING 35 for Neighborhood Conservation Background 35 and Commercial Revitalization 74 M-NCPPC-owned Historic Properties 36 Goal 76 Issues 36 Goal 37 Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan v Table of Contents CHAPTER 12 79 PART FOUR: APPENDICES 195 Background 79 Issues 79 APPENDIX A Goal 80 HISTORY OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY 197 CHAPTER 13 PARTNERSHIPS 83 APPENDIX B Background 83 DOCUMENTED HISTORIC COMMUNITIES 205 Issues 83 APPENDIX C Goal 84 M-NCPPC-OWNED PROPERTIES 253 CHAPTER 14 HERITAGE EDUCATION 87 APPENDIX D Background 87 INVENTORY OF HISTORIC CEMETERIES 255 Issues 87 Goal 87 APPENDIX E PREHISTORIC CONTEXT 265 CHAPTER 15 IMPLEMENTATION 91 Introduction 91 APPENDIX F Strategic Plan for Implementation 91 PRESERVATION ORGANIZATIONS 267 PART THREE: INVENTORY 95 APPENDIX G GLOSSARY OF TERMS 281 CHAPTER 16 HISTORIC SITES 97 APPENDIX H CHAPTER 17 COUNTY-DESIGNATED FULL COMMISSION RESOLUTION 293 HISTORIC DISTRICTS 169 Old Town College Park Historic District (66-042) 169 APPENDIX I Broad Creek Historic District (80-024) 169 CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION AND APPROVAL 297 CHAPTER 18 INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES 173 vi Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan Foreword Th e Prince George’s County Planning Board of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is pleased to make available the Approved Historic Sites and Districts Plan. Policy guidance for this plan came from the 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan and the 1992 Historic Sites and Districts Plan. Th e goals, concepts, and guidelines document that outlined many of the major issues addressed in the plan and provided structure for the planning process was presented to the Planning Board and District Council in November 2008. An extensive planning eff ort engaged historic property owners, citizens, residents, and other stakeholders in public participation activities and resulted in valuable contributions to the plan. In response to a request by county nonprofi t organizations and citizens at large, a draft of the plan prepared by staff was distributed for public comment in September 2009 in order to provide the opportunity for stakeholders to review the proposed policies and strategies. Th e plan represents an eff ort to chart the direction of future historic preservation policy in Prince George’s County. We are continuing this countywide eff ort through an Envision Prince George’s initiative to engage a broad cross section of stakeholders in developing a shared vision for the county’s future direction and growth. We invite you to visit the Envision Prince George’s web site at www.mncppc.org/Envision to learn more about how to participate in this exciting initiative. Th e approved plan includes changes to historic sites and resources, goals, policies, and strategies to guide future preservation planning eff orts and an initial set of implementation priorities. Appendices provide updated county and community histories; a summary of historic themes; and lists of cemeteries, organizations, and sources of additional information. On January
Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds

    Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds

    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
  • Diplomacy and the American Civil War: the Impact on Anglo- American Relations

    Diplomacy and the American Civil War: the Impact on Anglo- American Relations

    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses, 2020-current The Graduate School 5-8-2020 Diplomacy and the American Civil War: The impact on Anglo- American relations Johnathan Seitz Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/masters202029 Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Seitz, Johnathan, "Diplomacy and the American Civil War: The impact on Anglo-American relations" (2020). Masters Theses, 2020-current. 56. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/masters202029/56 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses, 2020-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Diplomacy and the American Civil War: The Impact on Anglo-American Relations Johnathan Bryant Seitz A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2020 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Dr. Steven Guerrier Committee Members/ Readers: Dr. David Dillard Dr. John Butt Table of Contents List of Figures..................................................................................................................iii Abstract............................................................................................................................iv Introduction.......................................................................................................................1
  • Washington Nationals' Ballpark

    Washington Nationals' Ballpark

    Washington Nationals’ Ballpark: Cost and Timeliness Implications of Using a Project Labor Agreement David G. Tuerck, PhD Alex Taylor, MSIE The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University 8 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108 Web: www.beaconhill.org phone: 617-573-8750 fax: 617-720-4272 email: [email protected] September 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 THE BALLPARK....................................................................................................................................... 5 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ON PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS........................................ 6 CONSTRUCTION MARKET................................................................................................................... 7 LABOR MARKET ..................................................................................................................................... 9 LABOR COMPOSITION AND RELATIONS...................................................................................... 11 THE WASHINGTON, D.C. CONVENTION CENTER....................................................................... 13 IMPACT ON COSTS ............................................................................................................................... 14 EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016

    A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016

    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
  • Liilillliilflil

    Liilillliilflil

    Form 10-300 (July 1969) West Virginia COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Jefferson INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) appy RetreatK AND/'OR HISTORIC: "Mordington" _____ R^ TOWN7 Charles Town (2nd. Congressional District) West Virginia 54 Jefferson 037 liilillliilflil CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC Z District ^] Building D Public Public Acquisition: 1x1 Occupied Yes: Restricted o Site Q Structure 5S1 Private [~] In Process [~~| Unoccupied Unrestricted D Object Both | | Being Considered Q Preservation work I- in progress No u PRESENT USE fCheck One or More as Appropriate) I I Agricultural I | Government D Pa^ | | Commercial I | Industrial (X) Private Residence I | Educational |~1 Military f~] Religious [ I Entertainment II Museum [~j Scientific OWNER'S NAME: William G. and Mary B. Gavin in STREET AND NUMBER: LLJ Happy Retreat (Mordington Avenue) CITY OR TOWN: Charles Town West Virginia COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Jefferson County Courthouse CD STREET AND NUMBER: l-h l-h (D ^ Cl TY OR TOWN: CO Charles Town West Virginia o 54 S TITLE OF SURVEY: Historic American Buildings Survey DATE OF SURVEY: 1937 Federal State j | County | | Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: Division of Prints and Photographs STREET AND NUMBER: Library of Congress CITY OR TOWN: STATE: District of Columbia 11 (Check One) Excellent Q Good Q Fair Q Deteriorated i,ps (... T~1. .Ijnexppsed CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) EH Altered ' (XJ Unaltered 'Q Moved tS Original Site This white painted*; structure is a classical-revival brick building with a 2%-story central block and a pair of 2-story flanking wings.
  • News and Notes

    News and Notes

    Newsand Notes i = a E EE z PrinceGeorge's CountY J g E HistoricalSocietY ! E Ed\flE 3 rr;. I lJ' January/February2000 Our 48e Year XXVItr Number I FAMILY OF FREDERICKS. DEMARRDEEDS LIBRARY TO SOCIETY Following probate,Louise Tatspaugh, longtimeHistorical Societymember and Fred's sister, officially deededthe FrederickS. DeMan Library to the Historical Society. Dated November 1999,and coincidingwith the approvalby the Board of the library's collectionmanagement policy, this generousgift was gratefully acceptedby the Board. The Library Committee, composedof Historian Susan Pearl, Board Secretaryand life-long County residentSarah Bourne and Librarian Sharon Howe Sweeting, hasworked steadilysince Fred's untimely death. Diane Stultz, a genealogicalresearch specialist, has been added to the Committee. Dusty Rhoads and Alan Virta haveprovided adviceon specificcollecting interests of Fred's. The Committee has, however, deviatedfrom Fred's plansby beginningto catalogue the collectioninto an online databasecalled InMagrc. Eventually,the vertical and biographical files, photographs,special and ephemeralmaterials will be incorporatedinto this databasewhich will be searchableon all fields. The library also hasan email address,a fa,r machine,a new answeringmachine and photocopier. Spacecontinues to be a premium but the Committee is slowly sifting through the collectionsto refine and focus them. Collection guidelinesare outlinedlater in this issue. We welcomeyour visit to assessour progress. A twentieth-century Gentleman's library 'z)a completedbefore considerationfor Call for Nominations an award. 6. The recipientshould be living at the time St. George'sDay Awards 2000 of the nomination. PrinceGeorge's County Historical Society 7. Projectsthat are solelythe productof a establishedthe St. George'sDay Arvardsin person'semployment or profession 1974to honor thosepersons or may be consideredunder certain organrzationsthat have made a differencein circumstancesif the projectreflects PrinceGeorge's County.
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long

    “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long

    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
  • Prince George's Counfy Historical Society News Andnotes

    Prince George's Counfy Historical Society News Andnotes

    rrl PrinceGeorge's Counfy zU a HistoricalSociety News andNotes Prince Georgeansin the Old West By Alan Virta When I told my friends and colleaguesin Idaho that I was going to talk about Prince Georgeansin the Old West-they gave me funny looks and more than one askedme- How could I ever find them? How would I know who they were? Well, finding them was the leastof myproblems-because everywhereI think I've ever gone-in the United States,at least-l'vs found tracesof PrinceGeorgeans. In the ancientcemetery in the village of Roseville,Ohio-home of my grandparents, greatgrandparents, and two generationsbefore them-there is a huge gravestonewith the name"Grafton Duvall" carvedon it, as PrinceGeorge's a-soundingname as everthere couldbe. When I checkedHany Wright Newman'sbible of Duvall genealogyI found that this GraftonDuvall-one of a numberof men to bearthat nameover several generations-wasindeed a nativeof PrinceGeorge's County. When I moved to Mississippi,one of the first placesI went to visit was Natchez-for nearthere is a historical marker denotingthe site of what was known as the "Maryland Colony" early settlementof PrinceGeorgeans from the Aquascoarea who movedto the old Southwestin the early yearsof the 1800sto take advantageof the fertile soil and opportunitiesthere. PrinceGeorgeans have been heading West sincethe very beginning. PrinceGeorgeans were,indeed, some of the first Westerners-becausein the late 17thcentury, this unorganized,lightly-settled land betweenthe Patuxentand Potomac Rivers was the West. It was Maryland's frontier,where European settlement bumped up againstthe original Indianinhabitants. Stories of Indian raids on the AnacostiaRiver settlements;of Ninan Beall's Rangersw\o patrolledthe frontier line beyondthe river-are as dramaticas any storiesfrom the 19tncentury West of the Apacheand the Sioux.
  • Capitol Hill Village NEWS

    Capitol Hill Village NEWS

    JULY/AUGUST 2014 CapItol HIll VIllage NEWS Housing Experts Advise CHV on Expanding Alternatives in the Area Members of the CHV Housing Subcommittee met recently with a pair of housing experts for advice on how to approach the lack of senior-friendly condominiums and rental apartments on the Hill and the lack of full-service senior communities, assisted living and patient-focused skilled nursing, and CHV members marched in the July Fourth Parade on 8th Street. See page 7 for more photos. skilled rehabilitation facilities on or near the Hill Mark Weiner, President and CEO Hard Choices Down The Road: of the Council on Jewish Elderly in Chicago, and Dan Cinelli, a partner Are We Ready To Plan Now? with the design and planning firm, Save the Date: September 18 Perkins Eastman, are national and Symposium for CHV Members international leaders in the senior and the Community housing and services sector. Mark and Dan shared their perspectives By Mary Procter about trends in senior housing and long-term care and strategies for Many of us have joined the Capitol identifying key “partners” who have Hill Village for the same reason continued on page 12 that Geoff Lewis originally founded it—we know that life can take us by surprise and sometimes smack us in IN THIS ISSUE the head. Many members have faced 2 Calendar or are facing hard choices about Howard Gleckman their own well-being or that of a 3 Energy Savings for Members spouse or close friend. some of the CHV members who 4 CHV Can Make a Difference have already experienced these 6 Village Gala; News You Can Use At an all-day symposium on crises in their lives.
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1950, Volume 45, Issue No. 4

    Maryland Historical Magazine, 1950, Volume 45, Issue No. 4

    MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Riversdale — Entrance Front Prince George's County MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY BALTIMORE December • 1950 • 4.4. ±4.4.4.4,4.4.4.4. ±4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4,4.4.4.4.4. J.4.4.4.4.XXJ*.J.J>.J.J.J.J..t.J.J.J.. FOR SALE BY THE SOCIETY Maryland in World War II, Vol. I: Military, by H. R. Manakee. 1950 384 pp. cloth. (Maryland Sales Tax 6c.) $3.25 History of Queen Anne's County, by Frederick Emory. 1886-7. Reprinted 1949. 629 pages, cloth cover. By mail, Maryland sales tax included $7.75 Portraits Painted before 1900 in the Collection of the Maryland His- torical Society, by Anna Wells Rutledge. 1946. 40 pages, illus- trated, paper covers $1.00 Handlist of Miniatures in the Collections of the Maryland Historical Society, by Anna Wells Rutledge. 1945. 18 pages, illustrated, paper covers .60 Augustine Herman's Map of Virginia and Maryland, 1673. Reproduced from original in John Carter Brown Library 6.50 Warner and Hanna's Map of Baltimore, 1801, Collotype reproduction in color 5.00 Old Wye Church, Talbot Co., Md. A History of St. Luke's at Wye Mills, by Elizabeth Merritt. 1949. 42 pages, paper covers .55 Calendar of the General Otho Holland Williams Papers in the Maryland Historical Society. 1940. 454 pages, mimeographed, paper covers. 2.75 Chronicles of Mistress Margaret Brent, by Mary E. W. Ramey. 1915. 12 pages, illustrated, paper covers 1.00 Descendants of Richard and Elizabeth Ewen Talbot of Poplar Knowle, West River, Anne Arundel Co., compiled by Ida Morrison Shirk.
  • 2016 Master Plan Committee Document

    2016 Master Plan Committee Document

    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL ____________ ____, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. ____ February 2016 Draft 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson __________ ___, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Community Planning and Business Services Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: __________ ____, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
  • News and Notes 1980-1989

    News and Notes 1980-1989

    NEWS AND NOTES FROM The Prince George's County Historical Society Vol. VIII, no. 1 January 1980 The New Year's Program There will be no meetings of the Prince George's County Historical Society in January or February. The 1980 meeting program will begin with the March meeting on the second Saturday of that month. Public Forum on Historic Preservation The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission will sponsor a public forum on the future of historic preservation in Prince George's County on Thursday, January 10, at the Parks and Recreation Building, 6600 Kenilworth Avenue, in Riverdale. This forum, is the first step in the process of drafting a county Historic Sites and Districts Plan by the commission. (See next article). The purpose of the forum is to receive public testimony on historic preservation in Prince George's county. Among the questions to be addressed are these: How important should historic preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, and revitalization be to Prince George's County? What should the objectives and priorities of a historic sites and districts plan be? What should be the relative roles of County government and private enterprise be in historic preservation and restoration? To what extent should the destruction of historic landmarks be regulated and their restoration or preservation subsidized? How should historic preservation relate to tourism, economic development, and revitalization? Where should the responsibility rest for making determinations about the relative merits of preserving and restoring individual sites? Members of the Historical Society, as well as others interested in historic preservation and its impact on county life, are invited to attend and, if they like, to testify.