DOCSLIB.ORG

The Distribution of Elephants, Tigers and Tiger Prey in Thailand's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Distribution of Elephants, Tigers and Tiger Prey in Thailand's The Distribution of Elephants, Tigers and Tiger Prey in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Pornkamol Jornburom IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY James L. David Smith, Adviser December 2016 © Pornkamol Jornburom, 2016 Acknowledgements This study is a part of collaborative work among Thailand’s Department of National Parks, Plant, and the Wildlife Conservation (DNP), the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS, Thailand) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF, Thailand) to conduct occupancy suveys in the western forest complex of Thailand. I am grateful with supports from DNP to conduct this research. I owe much to field crew who came from several organizations. I am particularly thankful for Mr. Somphot Duanchatrasiri, Mr. Krearkpon Wongchoo, and staff members at Khao Nang Rum Wildlife Research Station. I especially would like to thank WCS survey team: Sitthichai Jinamoy, Wittaya Teaktao, Don Roman, Kamol Faengbhupha, and Kwanchai Waitanyakan and WWF team: Rungnapa Phunchampa, Utai Dechyotdee, Worrapan Phumanee for their excellent jobs in the field despite resource and many challenges. Funding support for this project and my study were received from, the Rhino and Tiger Conservation Fund of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenberg Foundation (LCAOF), WCS graduate scholarship program, Hatch funding, ConsBio summer fellowship- the Conservation Biology Program at the University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, and Richard & Judi Huempfner Ruffed Grouse Fellowship. I am grateful with Professor James L. David Smith who served as an excellent adviser and fully supported my academic and research undertaking. I cannot thank you enough for accepting me into Conservation Biology Graduate Program at University of Minnesota. I am also deeply thankful to him for being patient reviewing and made constructive comments for my dissertation. I feel so gratified to have Professor Todd W. i Arnold, Assistant Professor John Fieberg, and James E. Hines as committee members. I appreciate their guidance regarding data analysis and all consistent support. I am sincerely grateful to all my committees for suggestions and insightful comments which improve my manuscripts and dissertation. In addition, I appreciate Professor Francesca J. Cuthbert for valuable comments for bringing this manuscript in this shape. I consider myself fortunate to have met, studied and worked with Dr. Anak Pattanavibool the Director of Wildlife Conservation Society-Thailand Program, who has supported me from the beginning of my career. I would like to thank him for believing in me, I cannot put into words how grateful I am to cover half of his supports. I benefited greatly from the friendship of my colleague graduate students: Fabiola Iannarilli, Lorraine Scotson, Josh Egan, Diele Lobo, Dr. Worata Klinsawat, Dr, Andrea Claassen, and Hannah Spcth, for their encouragement and suggestion on preliminary exams and data analysis. Also, I am grateful to all Thai friends in Minnesota and in Thailand for always being there for me. Finally, I thank my amazing family, especially my parents, sister, brothers and my grandmother for their love and supports. Anything I have accomplished could not have been possible without them. My deepest appreciation goes to Shaurav Raj Adhikai who helped me throughout the process which was, at times, difficult and frustrating. I am glad to have you as my partner in crime through all the good and the bad times. My greatest appreciation and admiration goes to His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej (Rama IX) as a role model of moral merit and perseverance to sustain and protect the nation’s environment and natural resources. His Majesty will live in my heart eternally. ii Dedication For wildlife And those who cannot live without wild things iii Abstract Conservation of large mammals such as Asian elephants (Elephas maximus), tigers (Panthera tigris) and their main prey, gaur (Bos gaurus), banteng (Bos javanicus), and sambar (Cervus unicolor) requires a systematic and statistically rigorous monitoring system that accounts for imperfect detection. Despite conservation efforts, these large mammals are highly threatened and declining across their entire range. In Thailand, large viable populations of these large mammals remain in the Western Forest Complex (WEFCOM), an approximately 19,000 km2 landscape of 17 contiguous protected areas. To determine species distribution and factors that affect distribution patterns, a government/NGO team conducted occupancy surveys throughout the WEFCOM landscape from 2010-1012. I analyzed these data at both a landscape scale (256 km2 for elephants, 64 km2 for tigers and their prey) and a local scale (1 km2). At the landscape scale, I estimated the proportion of sites occupied by each species. At a finer scale, I identified the key variables that influence site-use and developed predictive distribution maps. At both scales, I examined key ecological and anthropogenic factors that help explain distribution and preferred habitat use. Occupancy models revealed that elephant, gaur and sambar avoided villages and elephants, banteng and sambar prefered lower slopes near streams. Gaur, in contrast, preferred steep slopes at higher elevation. I estimated that elephants occupied 82% of the the landscape. Other species occupied much smaller portions of WEFCOM (tigers = 37%, gaur = 48%, sambar 53% and banteng 13%). Tiger occupancy was largely influenced by the three large prey species. Additionally, presence of villages has a consistent negative impact on occupancy and iv site-use by all these large mammals; therefore, reducing the impact of human activities near villages is the key conservation recommendation from this study. By modeling occupancy while accounting for probability of detection, I established reliable benchmark data on distribution of these endangered species. The results of this study underlined the need for further conservation and management to maintain wildlife distribution and populations in WEFCOM and other sites in Thailand and Southeast Asia. v Table of Contents List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………viii List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………x Chapter 1 - Two-scale Occupancy models for Conserving Asian Elephant in Thailand’s Western Forest complex Introduction………………………………………………………………………..1 Methods……………………………………………………………………………5 Results……………………………………………………………………….…...17 Discussion…...…………………………………………………………………...27 Conservation and Management Implications……………….…………………....30 Chapter 2 - Occupancy and Site Use of Tiger Prey in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex Introduction……………………………………………………………………....32 Methods…………………………………………………………………………..39 Results…………………………………………………………………………....50 Discussion…...…………………………………………………………………...69 Methodological issues……………………...……………….…………………....72 Chapter 3 - Impact of Prey Occupancy and Other Ecological and Anthropogenic Factors on Tiger Distribution in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex Introduction……………………………………………………………………....75 Methods…………………………………………………………………………..83 Results………………………………………………………………………........94 vi Discussion…...………………………………………………….……………....105 Conservation and Management Implications……………….…………………..108 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………123 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………..141 vii List of Tables Table 1.1 Summary of the field occupancy survey effort for each protected area in the Western Forest Complex (WEFCOM), Thailand. October 2010 - December 2012……..7 Table 1.2 List of factors hypothesized to influence patterns of occupancy (256 km2), use (1 km2) and detection probability of elephant in Western Forest Complex (WEFCOM), Thailand………………………………………………………………………………..13 2 Table 1.3. Model selection results of occupancy estimates at 256 km -scale (휓256) and 1 2 km -scale (휓1) for elephant based on ΔAIC <2 and estimates of untransformed 훽 coefficient values (standard errors, SE)………………………………………………….20 Table 2.1 Summary of the field occupancy survey effort for each protected area in the Western Forest Complex (WEFCOM), Thailand, Octoer 2010 - December 2012……...37 Table 2.2 List of factors hypothesized to influence patterns of occupancy (64 km2), use (1 km2) and detection probability at both scales of tiger prey in Western Forest Complex (WEFCOM), Thailand…………………………………………………………...………56 Table 2.3. Model-averaged estimates of tiger prey occupancy at 64 km2 and 1 km2 scale based on Hines et al. (2010) model, which incorporates spatial auto-correlation of sign detections (WEFCOM, Thailand, 2010-2012)…………………………...………………51 Table 2.4 Predictor variables used to include in all models for adequately describing variation in occupancy probability (휓) so that variation in 휓 would not be incorrectly interpreted as variation in detection probability (푝) at 64-km2 -scale…………………...52 viii 2 Table 2.5 Model selection results of occupancy estimates at 64 km -scale (휓64) for tiger prey based on ΔAIC <2 and estimates of untransformed 훽 coefficient values (standard errors, SE). Occupancy survey data conducted in WEFCOM, Thailand, 2010-2012 …..55 Table 2.6 Predictor variables used as a global occupancy model to evaluate covariates influencing detection for each species at 1-km2 scale…………………………………...63 Table 2.7 Most predictive models of site occupancy estimates (휓1) for focal tiger prey species as determined by Akaike’s Information Criterion (ΔAIC) <2 and estimates of untransformed 훽 coefficient values (standard errors, SE) based on occupancy survey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Affect Forest and Wildlife?
    HowHow WouldWould AffectAffect ForestForest andand Wildlife?Wildlife? 2 © W. Phumanee/ WWF-Thailand Introduction Mae Wong National Park is part of Thailand’s Western Forest Complex: the largest contiguous tract of forest in all of Thailand and Southeast Asia. Mae Wong National Park has been a conservation area for almost 30 years, and today the area is regarded internationally as a place that can offer a safe habitat and a home to many diverse species of wildlife. The success of Mae Wong National Park is the result of many years and a great deal of effort invested in conserving and protecting the Mae Wong forest, as well as ensuring its symbiosis with surrounding areas such as the Tung Yai Naresuan - Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, which was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1991. The large-scale conservation of these areas has enabled the local wildlife to have complete freedom within an extensive tract of forest, and to travel unimpeded in and around its natural habitat. However, even as Mae Wong National Park retains its status as a protected area, it stills faces persistent threats to its long-term sustainability. For many years, certain groups have attempted to forge ahead with large- scale construction projects within the National Park, such as the Mae Wong Dam. For the past 30 years, government officials have been pressured into authorizing the dam’s construction within the conservation area, despite the fact that the project has never passed an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). It is clear, then, that if the Mae Wong Dam project should go ahead, it will have a tremendously destructive impact on the park’s ecological diversity, and will bring about the collapse of the forest’s natural ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeland Final 2019
    PUBLIC VERSION Section I. Project Information Project Title: Khao Laem: Conservation in one of Thailand’s Frontier Tiger Parks Grantee Organisation: Freeland Foundation Location of project: Khao Laem National Park Kanchanaburi Province, Western Thailand See map in appendix Size of project area (if appropriate): Size of PA – 1,496.93 km² Partners: Management of Khao Laem National Park, Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP’s). Project Contact Name: Tim Redford Email: Reporting period: February 2019 to February 2020 (13 months) Section II. Project Results Long Term Impact: This survey project led by Khao Laem National Park for the first time categorically proves the presence of tigers at this site and progressed the recovery of tigers in Thailand by ensuring these tigers are recorded and included into tiger conservation planning, especially important for the concluding review of outcomes from the current Tiger Action Plan 2012-2022. Such information will also help prioritise protected areas for inclusion in the successive tiger action plan due in 2022. We anticipate such understanding will assist KLNP site gain increased government support, which will help ensure the long- term protection of Indochinese tigers. This is relevant both at this site and across the South Western Forest Complex (sWEFCOM) as protected areas are contiguous and tigers can disperse in any direction. While implementing this project we have learnt about gaps in forest connectivity, which if closed will give enhanced protection, or integrated into existing protected areas may improve dispersal corridors. Equipped with this information we can now look at ways to discuss those sites with the relevant agencies to understand why they exist in the first place and if the corridor status may be altered, as a way to enhance protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivores Research in 2007-2020 Western Forest Complex
    CARNIVORES RESEARCH IN 2007-2020 WESTERN FOREST COMPLEX ค ำน ำ การอนุรักษ์และจัดการสัตว์ป่าและถิ่นอาศัยนั้น จ าเป็นต้องด าเนินการภายใต้ข้อมูลพื้นฐาน ทางวิชาการ เพื่อให้การวางแผนการอนุรักษ์และการจัดการสัตว์ป่ามีแนวทางการด าเนินงานที่มีประสิทธิภาพ เหมาะสมกับสัตว์ป่าแต่ละชนิดและในแต่ละพื้นที่ การศึกษาวิจัยด้านสัตว์ป่าเพื่อให้ทราบข้อมูลทางด้านประชากร ชีววิทยา นิเวศวิทยา ลักษณะถิ่นอาศัยของสัตว์ป่า จึงเป็นข้อมูลที่ส าคัญส าหรับก าหนดและวางแผนการอนุรักษ์ สัตว์ป่า เพื่อให้การบริหารจัดการทรัพยากรธรรมชาติของประเทศมีประสิทธิภาพยิ่งขึ้น กลุ่มงานวิจัยสัตว์ป่า ภายใต้การด าเนินงานของสถานีวิจัยสัตว์ป่าเขานางร า ซึ่งเป็นหน่วยงานใน ส านักอนุรักษ์สัตว์ป่า กรมอุทยานแห่งชาติ สัตว์ป่า และพันธุ์พืช ได้รับมอบหมายภารกิจส าคัญในการสนับสนุน ข้อมูลวิชาการเพื่อช่วยงานจัดการด้านสัตว์ป่าและถิ่นอาศัยในพื้นที่ป่าอนุรักษ์ โดยสถานีวิจัยสัตว์ป่าเขานางร า ได้ด าเนินโครงการศึกษาวิจัยต่าง ๆ เพื่อศึกษาความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพ ชีววิทยาและนิเวศวิทยาของสัตว์ป่า ในพื้นที่ป่าอนุรักษ์ รวมถึงการส ารวจและติดตามสถานภาพสัตว์ป่าที่ส าคัญในพื้นที่มรดกโลกทางธรรมชาติ เขตรักษาพันธุ์สัตว์ป่าทุ่งใหญ่ - ห้วยขาแข้ง ซึ่งเป็นส่วนหนึ่งของผืนป่าตะวันตก เป็นพื้นที่ที่มีความหลากหลาย ทางชีวภาพและความชุกชุมของสัตว์ป่าสูง ทั้งกลุ่มสัตว์เลี้ยงลูกด้วยนม นก สัตว์เลื้อยคลาน และสัตว์สะเทินน้ า สะเทินบก อีกทั้งยังเป็นแหล่งอาศัยที่ส าคัญของสัตว์ป่าที่ใกล้สูญพันธุ์ และมีความส าคัญต่อระบบนิเวศในกลุ่ม ของสัตว์ผู้ล่าขนาดใหญ่ ทั้งเสือโคร่ง เสือดาว รวมถึงสัตว์กีบขนาดใหญ่ที่เป็นเหยื่อของสัตว์ผู้ล่าเหล่านั้น ผลงานวิจัยที่ได้ด าเนินการมาอย่างต่อเนื่องเป็นระยะเวลามากกว่า 10 ปี เป็นที่ยอมรับทั้งในประเทศและระดับ นานาชาติ และมีส่วนส
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report - Khao Laem: Conservation in One of Thailand’S Frontier Tiger Parks
    Interim Report - Khao Laem: Conservation in one of Thailand’s Frontier Tiger Parks Interim Report Khao Laem: Conservation in one of Thailand’s Frontier Tiger Parks NOTE- FOR SECURITY PURPOSES MAY LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS REPORT Report February to July 2019 1 Interim Report - Khao Laem: Conservation in one of Thailand’s Frontier Tiger Parks Introduction This report represents activities conducted in Western Thailand’s Khao Laem National Park designed to investigate the importance of the park in the distribution and conservation of Indochinese tigers (Panthera tigris corbetti). Work is led by Khao Laem officials from the Department of National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP), with technical support from Freeland via the WILDCATS Conservation Alliance. Prior to this year, limited low level wildlife surveys were conducted with data concluded here (see appendix). This led to the realisation that tigers (and Indochinese leopards) are present in this park and this warrants further investigation. Activities during 2019 will provide foundations for a Specially Explicit Capture Recapture (SECR) camera trap survey immediately after this first phase concludes in early 2020. Activities reported here represent activities over the first six months of this project between February and July 2019. Project Background Khao Laem National Park is one of 17 protected areas in Thailand’s Western Forest Complex. The park covers an area of 935,625 rai or 1,497 km2, with land area of 1,109 km2 (a central part was inundated by the Vajiralongkorn dam in 2001). It is located in the Tenasserim mountain range which extends north to south along the borders of Thailand and Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Correlations of Large Predators and Their Prey in Western Thailand
    Vinitpornsawan & Fuller: Predator and prey behaviours in Thailand Conservation & Ecology RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 68: 118–131 Date of publication: 8 April 2020 DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0013 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ABF4C425-5FAA-40F9-A4EC-C4DF0DAB51C6 Spatio-temporal correlations of large predators and their prey in western Thailand Supagit Vinitpornsawan1,2 & Todd K. Fuller1* Abstract. The coexistence of predators with similar morphology can be achieved by avoidance through behavioural, temporal and spatial segregation, which separates niches and reduces competition. Partitioning of space and time can reduce competition by decreasing the frequency of interspecific encounters that exploit a common resource base. We investigated temporal and spatial partitioning of tigers (Panthera tigris), leopards (Panthera pardus), dholes (Cuon alpinus), and their ungulate prey in Thung Yai Naresuan (East) Wildlife Sanctuary in western Thailand from April 2010 to January 2012. We collected camera trap data from 106 locations over 1,817 trap nights. Kernel density estimation and Spearman’s rank correlation were used to quantify temporal and spatial activity patterns. Pianka’s index was used to investigate the temporal and spatial overlap for each species pair. Tigers (crepuscular activity pattern) showed no temporal correlation with leopards (mostly diurnal) or dholes (strongly diurnal), but leopard activity appeared to correlate positively with dhole activity. Tigers exhibited temporal overlap with larger gaur (Bos gaurus) and sambar (Rusa unicolor); leopards did so with barking deer (Muntiacus muntjak) and wild boar (Sus scrofa); and dholes did so with barking deer and wild boar. The spatial correlations of tigers, leopards, and dholes did not significantly overlap, though numerically overlap was higher between felids than with the canid.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Th 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT TH 2018 2018 Since 1961, WWF has grown into the world’s largest independent conservation organization contributing to 12,000 initiatives with the aim to bring sustainable living between human and nature. The World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) aims to conserve nature and ecological processes by preserving bio- WWF-Thailand implements a strategy that diversity, ensuring sustainable use of natural harnesses the strengths of the WWF network resources and promoting the reduction of to focus on six major goals : freshwater, wildlife, pollution and highlighting the wasteful use oceans, climate & energy, forests, and food of resources and energy. WWF works in more while focusing on 3 key drivers of environmental than 100 countries around the world. WWF problems : markets, finance and governance. has been working in Thailand since 1983 In support of this strategy WWF-Thailand and WWF-Thailand was founded in 1995. works with government, business, civil society and individuals to achieve our global goals for the benefit of the people of Thailand and the world. 09 Sustainable Rubber ....32 SUSTAINABLE LIVING 04 SIDA Project ....17 Sustainable Markets ....25 10 Sustainable Finance ....35 05 Lao-Thai Fisheries ....19 07 Sustainable Fisheries ....27 Co-Management Project ....29 06 Nong Han Wetland ....22 08 Sustainable Aquaculture Ecological Restoration and Improve Local Livelihoods Project URBAN DEVELOPMENT WILDLIFE & CONSERVATION 11 Youth Water Guardians Program ....37 ....39 01 Mae Wong & Khlong Lan Project ....6 12 Eco-Schools Programme ....41 02 Kuiburi Wildlife Conservation Project ....10 13 Sustainable Consumption ....45 03 Illegal Wildlife Trade ....14 14 One Planet City Challenge I am pleased to report to friends, donors and partners that 2018 was a very good year for WWF-Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaur (<I>Bos Gaurus</I>) Abundance, Distribution, and Habitat Use
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 5-2016 Gaur (Bos gaurus) Abundance, Distribution, and Habitat use patterns in Kuiburi National Park, Southwestern Thailand Supatcharee Tanasarnpaiboon University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Tanasarnpaiboon, Supatcharee, "Gaur (Bos gaurus) Abundance, Distribution, and Habitat use patterns in Kuiburi National Park, Southwestern Thailand" (2016). Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources. 129. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresdiss/129 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. GAUR (BOS GAURUS) ABUNDANCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND HABITAT USE PATTERNS IN KUIBURI NATIONAL PARK, SOUTHWESTERN THAILAND by Supatcharee Tanasarnpaiboon A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Natural Resource Sciences (Applied Ecology) Under the Supervision of Professor John P. Carroll Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2016 GAUR (Bos gaurus) ABUNDANCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND HABITAT USE PATTERNS IN KUIBURI NATIONAL PARK, SOUTHWESTERN THAILAND Supatcharee Tanasarnpaiboon, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2016 Advisor: John P. Carroll Population status of gaur (Bos gaurus), a wild cattle, in most habitats where they are present, is still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospect for Creative Collaboration: a Peace Park
    The Prospect of Creative Collaboration: A Peace Park between Myanmar and Thailand A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF COMMUNITY PLANNING in the School of Planning at the College of Design, Art, Architecture, and Planning University of Cincinnati by JENNIFER M. LATESSA B.A. University of Vermont 2009 April 2014 Committee: David Edelman, Ph.D., Chair Jan Fritz, Ph.D. Abstract This study evaluates the potential for a peace park in the mountain range that delineates the border between Myanmar and Thailand, or the Tanintharyi Mountain Range. The Tanintharyi Mountain Range is delicate, socioeconomically, environmentally, and politically, with a long history of conflict. With Myanmar re-opening its border, an international network has begun discussing the possibility of designating the land for shared conservation. The work being done by this network includes scientific research and a stakeholder analysis. These findings help contextualize the diagnostic results and support the overall goal of this study: to assess the challenges and solutions for the prospective peace park. Translated versions of the Diagnostic Tool for Trans-boundary Conservation Planners, a questionnaire developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), were created to collect results from stakeholders in the area who have the power to stop or start the initiative. These findings conveyed indicators of need, readiness, opportunities and threats for a shared conservation zone along the border. The logic and structure of this argument weaves through different disciplines and a large range of geographic and cultural contexts to address the varied nature of environmental conflict resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Thungyai - Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuaries Thailand
    THUNGYAI - HUAI KHA KHAENG WILDLIFE SANCTUARIES THAILAND These two mountain forest sanctuaries cover 600 km and over 620,000 ha spread along the Myanmar border. They are in nearly pristine condition and the flora is extremely diverse. Four biogeographic realms meet here which contain almost all the forest types of mainland Southeastern Asia and protect one of the world’s largest dry tropical forests. There is a correspondingly wide array of animals which include 77% of the large mammals, including elephants and tigers, 50% of the large birds and 33% of the terrestrial vertebrates found in the region. COUNTRY Thailand NAME Thungyai - Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuaries NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1991: Inscribed together on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, ix & x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE [pending] IUCN MANAGEMENT CATEGORY Thungyai-Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary: IV Habitat/Species Management Area Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary: IV Habitat/Species Management Area BIOGEOGRAPHICAL PROVINCE Indochinese Rainforest (4.5.1) GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION Thungyai–Naresuan is located about 300 km northwest of Bangkok, next to the Myanmar border at the south end of the Dawna-Tenasserim range. Coordinates: 14°55’ to 15°45’ N by 98°28’ to 99°05’ E. Huai Kha Khaeng adjoins it to the east between 15°00’ to 15°50’N and 99°00’ to 99°28’ E. DATES AND HISTORY OF ESTABLISHMENT 1972: Thungyai – Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary established under the 1960 Wild Animals Reservation and Protection Act, which was re-enacted in 1992; 1974: Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary established under the same Act; 1990: Nam Choan Forest Reserve saved from damming for addition to Thungyai; 2005: Designated an ASEAN Heritage Park.
    [Show full text]
  • BIODIVERSITY and PROTECTED AREAS Thailand
    Page 1 of 25 Regional Environmental Technical Assistance 5771 Poverty Reduction & Environmental Management in Remote greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Watersheds Project (Phase I) BIODIVERSITY AND PROTECTED AREAS Thailand By J E Clarke, PhD CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND 3 1.1 Country profile 3 1.2 Biodiversity 3 2 BIODIVERSITY POLICY 8 3 BIODIVERSITY LEGISLATION 14 3.1 State law 14 3.2 International conventions 15 4 CATEGORIES OF PROTECTED AREAS 16 5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 16 5.1 State management 16 5.2 Management plans 18 5.3 NGO and donor involvement 19 5.4 Private sector involvement 20 6 INVENTORY OF PROTECTED AREAS 20 7 CONSERVATION COVER BY PROTECTED AREAS 25 8 AREAS OF MAJOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE 26 9 TOURISM IN PROTECTED AREAS 28 10 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 11 GENDER 31 12 CROSS BOUNDARY ISSUES 31 Page 2 of 25 12.1 Internal boundaries 31 12.2 International borders 31 13 MAJOR PROBLEMS AND ISSUES 33 1. BACKGROUND 1.1. Country profile Thailand lies between latitudes 5 035' and 20 025' N, and longitudes 97 020' and 105 040' E. Most of the country is in the Indochinese Peninsula but the southern extremity extends into the Malay Peninsula. Its area is 514,100 km 2. Thailand’s neighbours are Myanmar to the west and north, Lao PDR to the northeast and east and Cambodia to the southeast. The narrow southern extremity runs between the Andoman Sea to the west and the Gulf of Thailand to the east, and the southernmost tip adjoins Malaysia. The country is divided into 76 provinces. About one third of the country is low-lying plain—the Khorat Plateau—which extends up to the Mekong River.
    [Show full text]
  • Thung Yai - Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary
    Thung Yai - Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary Thai World Heritage The vast expanse of Huai Kha Khaeng forest is home to a variety of flora and fauna. Thung Yai-Huai kha khaeng Wildlife Sanctuaries are the most abundant forest reserves in Thailand. Karen ethnic people in the west of the country and experienced hunter from town and city have known for long that these sanctuaries are home to a variety of wildlife animals, especially Asiatic or Wild Water Buffalo. The creature became extinct in other forests in the country, but was found roaming these sanctuaries in 1965. As a result, shortly after, Huai kha khaeng and Thung Yai Naresuan forests were declared wildlife sanctuaries. In April 1973 a Royal Thai Army helicopter crashed in Bang Len district of Nakhon Pathom province. Numerous carcasses of protected wildlife animals were retrieved from the debris. The story caused a media sensation and became a subject for investigative journalism. The media later found that passengers on board were returning from a hunting trip in Thung Yai forest. The scandalous story called into question the special privileges held by the country’s rulers at that time. Then it became one of the driving forces behind the antidictatorship uprising of 14 October 1973. Since that day, the reputation of these sanctuaries has become widely recognised. Every time the reserve comes under various kinds of threat, all nature lovers have no hesitation in protecting it as best they can. In December 1991 UNESCO reached its decision to inscribe Thung Yai - Huai kha khaeng Wildlife Sanctuaries on the World Heritage List thanks largely to three outstanding characteristics based on four UNESCO selection criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand Central Thailand (Chapter)
    Thailand Central Thailand (Chapter) Edition 14th Edition, February 2012 Pages 35 PDF Page Range 156-190 Coverage includes: Ayuthaya Province, Around Ayuthaya, Lopburi Province, Lopburi, Kanchanaburi Province, Kanchanaburi, Around Kanchanaburi, Thong Pha Phum, Sangkhlaburi, and Around Sangkhlaburi. Useful Links: Having trouble viewing your file? Head to Lonely Planet Troubleshooting. Need more assistance? Head to the Help and Support page. Want to find more chapters? Head back to the Lonely Planet Shop. Want to hear fellow travellers’ tips and experiences? Lonely Planet’s Thorntree Community is waiting for you! © Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd. To make it easier for you to use, access to this chapter is not digitally restricted. In return, we think it’s fair to ask you to use it for personal, non-commercial purposes only. In other words, please don’t upload this chapter to a peer-to-peer site, mass email it to everyone you know, or resell it. See the terms and conditions on our site for a longer way of saying the above - ‘Do the right thing with our content. ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd C e n t r a l T h a i l a n d Why Go? Ayuthaya Province ........157 Overfl owing with nearly as much history as it is nature, Cen- Ayuthaya .......................157 tral Thailand off ers everything from cascading waterfalls to Around Ayuthaya...........167 ancient temple ruins. Nature lovers are drawn to the cloud- Lopburi ......................... 168 canopied mountain ranges that separate Thailand from My- anmar (Burma) and the untamed jungle that shelters tigers, Kanchanaburi Province .........................173 elephants and leopards.
    [Show full text]