Print Ross Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Print Ross Thesis DEATH AND BURIAL AT PORT ARTHUR 1830-1 877 Lynette Ross (B.A.) Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours), Department of History, University of Tasmania, Hobart May 1995 Hi5 to. l All of the work in this thesis is my own, containing to the best of my knowledge and belief no material published or written by another person except as referred to in the text. .............k .... bJ= ........................... 31 May 95 Lynette Ross For all those who lie forgotten on the Isle of the Dead. For the convicts who were never freed in life but were by death; the boys from Point Puer who never grew up; the invalids sent to Port Arthur to die in pain and suffering; the lunatics; and the several hundred paupers whom society deemed fit to end their days at a penal settlement. May they rest in peace. ABSTRACT ahis thesis examines the subject of death and burial at Port Arthur by testing assertions used in current interpretation of the graveyard, the Isle of the Dead. The issues addressed relate to who was buried there, how many, causes of death and methods of interment. In order to fulfil the aims, relevant death and burial registers were transcribed and compiled on to a database. It has been demonstrated that the number of dead believed to be on the Island was too high and an alternative figure is suggested. Those in unmarked graves were found to be not just convicts but a mixture of convict, pauper, invalid and lunatic, thus i~l'ustratin~the complexity of function of this penal settlement. Indeed, the pattern of burial mirrors the transitional stages of Port Arthur's development, as well as social attitudes of the age. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost 1 wish to acknowledge the support and help given by my long suffering husband, Andrew Piper. I thank my supervisor Professor Michael Roe for direction and guidance. The management and staff of Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority have provided resources and time. I would especially thank Sue Burgess and Lesley Kirby for their support and the active ferreting out of information. The Archives Office of Tasmania provided much needed assistance in accessing historical documents essential to this thesis. I thank them for just being there. 1 also thank Jan Beltz of the Genealogical Society for her invaluable help in tracking down inquests and with the Comptroller General's Register of Convict Deaths. I would also like to acknowledge Andrew Thorn for furbishing me with details of the inscriptions still extant on the Isle of the Dead headstones and for listening while I purged myself of the mental overload. For inspiring my interest in history while an under-graduate I will be forever grateful to Dr Tom Dunning. Last but not least I wish to thank my mother for her unwavering belief in the value of education and her untiring support. TABLE OF CONTENTS Frontispiece: Aerial photograph of the Isle of the Dead, 1982 .................................................................. i .. Abstract .................................................... ............. II ... Acknowledgements ......... ................................ ... ..... III Table of Contents ................................................... iv List of Figures ....................................................... vi List of Tables ......................................................... vii INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: Review of Literature ............................. 5 CHAPTER 2: The Primary Sources ............................. 10 CHAPTER 3: Determining the Numbers ...................... 31 CHAPTER 4: Causes of Death .................................... 38 CHAPTER 5: Burial Practice ..................................... CHAPTER 6: Synthesis of Results ............................. APPENDIX 1: Wesleyan Burial Register ..................... APPENDIX 2: Statistics of Tasmania ........................ APPENDIX 3: Church of England Burial Register ........ APPENDIX 4: Impression Bay Burial Register ............ APPENDIX 5: Reports of Deaths ................................ APPENDIX 6: Comptroller General of Convicts Alphabetical Register of Convict Deaths & Returns of Convicts Deaths and Casualties .............................. APPENDIX 7: Registrar Generals' Records of Deaths.. TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) APPENDIX 8: List of those with headstones on the Is!e of the Dead........................................................... 198 APPENDIX 9: Port Arthur Death and Burial Database.. 203 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................... .. 208 LIST OF FIGURES 3.1 Burial mounds on the lower side of the 34 Island with the grave-digger's hut in the background. 5.1 Inquest of Richard Bickley murdered by 62 Thomas Shaw. 5.2 View of the free section showing the grave . 68 of Alexander Barr in the foreground (note wooden grave markers). LIST OF TABLES CHAPTER 2 2.1 The number of convict deaths per year as recorded on the Wesleyan Burial Register compared with statistics of convict deaths sent to the Colonial Office for Port Arthur and Point Puer. 2.2 Those with headstones on the Isle of the Dead 1833-43 not recorded on the Wesleyan Burial Register. 2.3 Number and category of free persons as recorded on the Wesleyan Burial Register and headstones 1 833-43. 2.4 Ages of convicts dying at Port Arthur as recorded on the Wesleyan Burial Register. 2.5 Trades of convicts dying at Port Arthur as recorded on the Wesleyan Burial Register 1833-43. 2.6 Those recorded on the Wesleyan Burial Register as residing elsewhere than Port Arthur and Point Puer. 2.7 Categories used in the Church of England Burial Register to describe persons dying. 2.8 Those persons said to have headstones by Richard Lord which could not be verified. 2.9 Those recorded as buried on the Isle of the Dead 1833-43 without headstones. 2.1 0 Annual numbers of deiths and burials at Port Arthur 1 830-1 877. LIST OF TABLES (cont.) CHAPTER 4 4.1 Causes of deaths at the Port Arthur 41 hospital for the years 1 830-41. 4.2 Medical causes of death numbering more 45 than one. 4.3 Number dying of old age. 46 4.4 Causes of infant mortality. 46 4.5 Causes of child mortality. 47 CHAPTER 5 5.1 Those persons with sandstone vaults on the 69 Isle of the Dead. INTRODUCTION g growing acceptance of Australia's convict roots has focused the attention of historians on this aspect of the country's past. Currently researchers are concentrating on the issues of convict work and health with one of the latest contributions being a selection of articles which seeks to reinterpret the evidence and revise accepted ideas on transportation, convict character and the value of convict work. l However this publication serves both to underline the centering on New South Wales for such studies and the neglect of Tasmania as a source of productive enquiry. It also points out that it is the lives of convicts that have relevance and not their demise, yet death is inseparable from life and much can be learned about the one by studying the other. The development of a death denying society2 in this century has placed restrictions on the appeal of the study of mortality and, although the barriers have been somewhat broken down in the field of psychology by the work of Elizabeth Kubler-Ross and those who followed,s few publications deal with the subject in a historical perspective. One author who has specialised in this area is Philippe Aries whose, The Hour of Our Death, traces through more than a thousand years the development of attitudes towards death and how this was reflected in burial practice and art.4 This long view shows the movement of burials from outside population centres in the pagan and early Christian period; to the precincts of churches in the medieval years; to within the cities in early modern times; and finally, back to the outskirts in the eighteenth century. These changes were a result of alterations in the perception of whether the body was corrupted or sanctified by death with the last move being prompted by the unsanitary 1 S. Nicholas (ed.), Convict Workers: Reinterpreting Australia's Past (Cambridge, 1 988). 2 See P. Aries, The Hour of Our Death (London, 1981), pp.559-601. 3 Ibid., p.589 for a discussion of this. Aries, op. cit. nature of now overcrowded graveyards and fears of the spread of epidemics.5 The presence, form and content of memorials erected over graves also changed over time with a shift from the outward show of corruption in the thirteenth to seventeenth centuries to a gentler form,6 with angels and cherubs replacing the decomposing corpse and grinning skull. Anthropologist James Deetz has illustrated the value in studying this graveyard art.' Stylistic evolution in early New England cemeteries shows an alteration from winged deaths heads in the seventeenth century, to winged cherubs in the mid eighteenth and finally to an urn and willow design later that century. The author firmly ties these to the rise of religious movements and changes in world view.8 Whereas Aries links the revival of inscriptions in the twelfth century to the growth of the belief in individual judgement after death,g another author on the subject, Clare Gittings, ties the desire for worldly remembrance more firmly to the rise of individualism itself.10 One of the consequences of the increased importance placed on the individual was the emergence in the eighteenth century of the perception of the grave as home for the body. The function of the cemetery became a venue for the visit of family and friends with the tomb embodying the physical presence of the deceased.' 1 Eighteenth and nineteenth century . attitudes to death accompanied colonists to new lands and manifested themselves in burial practice and mourning customs. The development of these to the present day in an Australian 5 Ibid., p. 348. Ibid., pp. 120-6. J. Deetz, In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life (New York, 1977), pp.64-90. 8 Ibid., pp.69-7 1. Aries, op. cit., p. 21 7. 10 C. Gittings, Death, Burial and the Individual in Early Modem England (London, 1 984), p.
Recommended publications
  • Convict Trail
    CONVICT TRAIL From historic Richmond to the Tasman START: Hobart DURATION: 1 - 3 days National Park, Eaglehawk Neck and NATIONAL PARKS ON THIS ROUTE: Port Arthur Historic Site, this fascinating > Tasman National Park journey is rich in convict history and natural beauty. The Tasman Peninsula is a place of breathtaking seascapes, some of the tallest sea cliffs in the world, and wild ocean views. LEG TIME / DISTANCE Hobart to Richmond 25 min / 27 km Richmond to Port Arthur 1 hr 10 min / 83 km Port Arthur to Hobart 1 hr 20 min / 95 km Hobart - Richmond > Drive to the village of Richmond, with its colonial past, antique shops, art and craft galleries, restaurants and tea rooms. > Richmond is a perfect place to learn about Tasmania’s rich heritage and is home to Australia’s oldest bridge, built by convict labour between 1823 and 1825, Australia’s oldest still-standing Catholic Church - St Johns - built in 1836, and Australia’s oldest gaol, built in 1825. > Also of interest is Old Hobart Town, a carefully constructed model of Hobart as it was in 1820. > Close by are the vineyards and wineries of the Coal River Valley, part of the Southern Tasmanian Wine Regions where you can taste award-winning cool-climate wines. > The region is also rich in produce including cheese and olives. Why not enjoy a long lunch at Frogmore Creek or Pooley Wines. Afterwards enjoy a row on the river or a relax on the riverbanks. > Overnight Richmond or return Hobart #discovertasmania fb.com/discovertasmania @tasmania WWW.DISCOVERTASMANIA.COM.AU Richmond - Port Arthur > On the way to Port Arthur stop at the Colonial and Convict Exhibition in Copping, with its extensive collection of interesting convict artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman Peninsula
    7 A OJ? TASMAN PENINSULA M.R. Banks, E.A. Calholln, RJ. Ford and E. Williams University of Tasmania (MRB and the laie R.J. Ford). b!ewcastle fo rmerly University of Tasmama (EAC) and (ie,a/Ogle,Cl; Survey of Tasmania (E'W) (wjth two text-figures lUld one plate) On Tasman Peninsula, southeastern Tasmania, almost hOrizontal Permian marine and Triassic non-marine lOcks were inllUded by Jurassic dolerite, faulted and overiain by basalt Marine processes operating on the Jurassic and older rocks have prcl(iU!ced with many erosional features widely noted for their grandeur a self-renewing economic asset. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Permian, dolerite, erosional coastline, submarine topography. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS lllSTORY ENOUGH ? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 7-23. INTRODUCTION Coal was discovered ncar Plunkett Point by surveyors Woodward and Hughes in 1833 (GO 33/ Tasman Peninsula is known for its spectacular coastal 16/264·5; TSA) and the seam visited by Captain scenery - cliffs and the great dolerite columns O'Hara Booth on May 23, 1833 (Heard 1981, p.158). which form cliffs in places, These columns were Dr John Lhotsky reported to Sir John Franklin on the first geological features noted on the peninsula. this coal and the coal mining methods in 1837 (CSO Matthew Flinders, who saw the columns in 1798, 5/72/1584; TSA). His thorough report was supported reported (1801, pp.2--3) that the columns at Cape by a coloured map (CSO 5/11/147; TSA) showing Pillar, Tasman Island and Cape "Basaltcs" (Raoul) some outcrops of different rock This map, were "not strictlybasaltes", that they were although not the Australian not the same in form as those Causeway Dictionary of (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastronomic Tasmanian Trekking 2021
    GASTRONOMIC TASMANIAN TREKKING Oct 23rd - 29th, 2021 port arthur trekking Adventure 5 Star accommodation Three Capes, Hauy, Pillar and Raoul Port Arthur Penal Settlement Wine Glass Bay trekking Adventure Gourmet Restaurant bookings Mount Amos and Mount Graham Boat Cruise around Three Capes Day Hiking Dunalley bay Adventure All Tasmania Travel Included STERLING RESULTS PTY LTD TRADING AS STERLING RESULTS FITNESS CLUB ABN :22103553493 Gastronomic Tasmanian Trekking Trip Summary Dates: October 23rd - 29th , 2021 Trip Duration: 7 days, 6 nights Fitness Grading: Moderate to hard All transfers Ex Launceston, twin share Price $2890 Based on 7 adventurers What Included 3 days trekking, exploring Tasmania's Three Capes : Cape Raoul, Cape Pillar and Cape Hauy (day hikes only) 2 days trekking Mount Amos and Mt Sterling Results Fitness Club offers this exclusive trip, designed to explore the beautiful Three Capes walk and Wine Glass Bay as well as Graham at Wine Glass Bay in the enjoy the local delicacies of Tasmania. Frecinyet National Park Mini Bus Travel for entire journey We arrive in Launceston and drive to Wine Glass Bay for 2 nights. Here 2 night accommodation in Coles Bay we enjoy the beautiful Freycinet National Park over 2 days of 4 nights accommodation at Stewarts spectacular hiking. Day 3 we depart for Port Arthur, via the Bay picturesque town of Dunalley, which was burnt out in the fires of 2013. We stop for lunch along the way followed by a beach walk at Dunalley Lunch and Beach walk at "Dunalley Bay Bay Distillery. Before arriving in Port Arthur, we will also visit the Tasting Hut" Tessellated pavement in Eaglehawk Neck.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • ENACT – Submission to Legislative Council Inquiry Into Built Heritage Tourism in Tasmania – February 2015
    ENACT – submission to Legislative Council Inquiry into Built Heritage Tourism in Tasmania – February 2015 To the Committee Secretary: The following submission is respectfully put forward for consideration by the sub–committee. Addressing the terms of reference of your enquiry: Our built heritage in Tasmania is representative of the diverse nature of our growth from early settler days to some of the iconic buildings of today. Nowhere else in Australia is this diversity so abundant and compacted into such a small geographical area with matching natural beauty. It is unique to Tasmania and we are squandering much of that heritage and the opportunity that goes with it. This seems to be, in part, due the inability for all stakeholders to talk to each other and work together for the common good and realistic outcomes. Your reference points – government, tourism organisations, heritage organisations, other controlling bodies (eg – PWS) each do their own bits of research and work and prepare extensive reports that are printed, read, possibly mentioned in the media and are promptly filed for some future reference. Unless someone in an influential position picks up an idea or project, little happens. Then there are anti-everything groups and NIMBYs that seem to be able to stop any idea, good or bad, in its tracks. No one body seems to be responsible for collating the various reports and agreements (and disagreements) that occur over time. Such a body could facilitate the prioritisation of those projects have support from multiple agencies and stakeholders and bring those parties together to make them happen. A case in point is our own town of Eaglehawk Neck.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAVITY SURVEY and STRUCTURE of the FORESTIER PENINSULA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by David Leaman
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 131, 1997 77 GRAVITY SURVEY AND STRUCTURE OF THE FORESTIER PENINSULA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by David Leaman (with 13 text-figures) LEAMAN, D.E.. , 1997 (31 :viii): Gravity survey and structure of the Forestier Peninsula, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 131: 77-84. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.131.77 ISSN 0080-4703. Leaman Geophysics, GPO Box 320C, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001 and Geology Department, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-79, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. A gravity survey coupled with review of regionalmapping has shown that the widespread exposure of Jurassic dolerite across the Foresrier Peninsula is due largely to repetition of a thick sheet by gently ramped Tertiary fault-blocks. Feeders for the sheet appear to be located near the centre of the peninsula and to be related to concealed pre-Permian structures, such as granitoid margins. At least two major fault zones were eroded during the mid Tertiary and these, as well as the peninsula ties to mainland Tasmania and the Tasman Peninsula, now consist of Tertiary materialscovered by Recent sands. The western edge of the East Tasmanian batholith extends approximately north­ south beneath the centre of the peninsula. Keywords: Tasmania, dolerite, structure, Forestier Peninsula, faulting, intrusion. INTRODUCTION This paper documents the firstsemi-regional gravity survey and structural interpretation of the Forestier Peninsula (fig. 1). Previous geological work has been largely limited co regional mapping of the main body of the peninsula (Gulline 1982, 1984), sketch mapping of the Eaglehawk Neck area (Banks et af.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Arthur Historic Sites Statutory Management Plan 2008
    Port Arthur Historic Sites Statutory Management Plan 2008 Author Identification: This draft management plan has been prepared by a multi-disciplinary team assembled specifically for this project. The work has been undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in association with Greg Middleton and Port Arthur Historic Site Management staff. PAHSMA staff members Greg Jackman, Richard Tuffin and Julia Clark substantially contributed to sections 2 and 3. The review of material relating to social values was undertaken by Context Pty Ltd. Acknowledgements: This draft management plan incorporates contributions from a wide range of people including current and former Authority staff, Board members and community stakeholders. All of these contributions are gratefully acknowledged. The considerable contribution of Jane Harrington, the Authority’s Director of Conservation and Infrastructure, and of Trish Hamilton, Executive Projects Coordinator is particularly acknowledged. Management plans for other historic sites and land managed by Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service provided a benchmark for the structure and content of this management plan. Some relevant policies and actions from these management plans have been incorporated into this management plan. Contents Section One: Introduction page 1 1.1. About this management plan ... 2 1.2. Areas of Land Subject to this Management Plan ... 3 1.3. Management Plan Objectives ... 4 1.4. Development of this Management Plan ... 8 1.5. Contents of this Management Plan ... 10 1.6. Secondary and Tertiary Plans ... 11 Section Two: Understanding the Place page 17 2.1. Introduction ... 18 2.2. Historical Context ... 19 2.3. Physical Description ... 31 2.4. Social Context ... 39 2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman National Park and Reserves Management Plan 2011
    MANAGEMENT PLAN 2011 Tasman NATIONAL PARK AND RESERVES Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Tasman National Park and Eaglehawk Neck Historic Site Mount Arthur State Reserve Pirates Bay Nature Recreation Area Safety Cove State Reserve Stewarts Bay State Reserve Tessellated Pavement State Reserve Management Plan 2011 Tasman National Park and Reserves Management Plan 2011 This management plan for Tasman National Park and Reserves has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part 3 of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. The term ‘Minister’ when used in the plan means the Minister administering this Act. The terms ‘park’ and ‘national park’ refer to the Tasman National Park. In accordance with Section 30(1) of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002, the managing authority for the park, in this case the Director of National Parks and Wildlife, shall carry out duties in relation to the park for the purpose of giving effect to, and in accordance with the provisions of, this management plan. The term ‘Director’ when used in the plan means the Director of National Parks and Wildlife. The appendices do not form part of the statutory plan, but are provided as additional information to assist in management. The draft management plan altering the 2001 plan was released for public comment from 2 February to 11 March 2008. The Resource Planning and Development Commission reviewed public comments on the plan and the Director’s report on proposed responses to those comments and provided a report to the Minister in June 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Tasmanian Ferns
    Threatened Tasmanian Ferns Flora Recovery Plan Flora Recovery Plan: Threatened Tasmanian Ferns i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Much of the site and ecological information in this Recovery Plan is based upon the work of Garrett (1997), with some passages reproduced verbatim and without repeated citation. The preparation of this Plan was funded by the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. Citation: Threatened Species Section (2011). Flora Recovery Plan: Threatened Tasmanian Ferns. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. © Threatened Species Section This work is copyright. It may be produced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgment of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Threatened Species Section, Biodiversity Conservation Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. Disclaimer: The attainment of objectives outlined in this Recovery Plan may be subject to budgetary and other constraints. Recommended recovery actions may be subject to modification due to changes in knowledge or conservation status. ISBN: 978-0-7246-6598-3 (web) 978-0-7246-6601-0 (book) Abbreviations ALCT Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania CAR Comprehensive, Adequate and Representative (Reserve System) CLAC Crown Land Assessment and Classification project (DPIPWE) DIER Tasmanian Department of Industry, Energy and Resources DPIPWE
    [Show full text]
  • The Budgerigar Council of Tasmania INC
    The Budgerigar Council of Tasmania INC. Saturday - Morning At Leisure Salamanca Market & Mawson’s Huts Replica Museum Enjoy the sights, sounds, flavours, action and colour of Australia's best outdoor market - proudly operated by the City of Hobart - every Saturday from 8:30am to 3:00pm at Hobart's Salamanca Place. Set between graceful plane trees and the mellow sandstone facades of historic warehouses, Hobart's famous market at Salamanca Place attracts thousands of locals and visitors, every Saturday of the year. Salamanca Market highlights fine Tasmanian art & craft including hand-worked glass, innovative design in Tasmanian timbers, stylish clothing and bold ceramics. The Mawson’s Huts Replica Museum is Hobart’s newest tourist attraction. Situated on, the city’s beautiful waterfront it is just 50 metres from Constitution Dock and opposite Mawson’s Place. The Australasian Antarctic Expedition under Douglas Mawson – the pre-eminent scientific expedition of its time to South Polar regions – happened when Australia http://www.mawsons-huts-replica.org.au was little more than a decade old. While other expeditions had started out from Australia in the 1890s, they had been financed and led from elsewhere. Here was an expedition planned, largely financed and led from Australia – an astonishing achievement for so young a nation. Afternoon:** Richmond - Afternoon Highlights Departs 1.10 pm – Returns 5.00 pm Adult - $75.00 (Child $35.50) Be transported in the afternoon to one of Australia's oldest villages. Richmond Village is one of Australia’s most original historic villages full of the romance and nostalgic charm of colonial days dating back from the 1820’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanunnah 4: 1–118, 30 June 2011
    K ANUNNAH The Research Journal of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery VOLUME 4 Ka-nunnah – ‘Thylacine’ The oldest fossils of thylacines are Late Oligo­ and the North­west and Western Tribes called it cene to Middle Miocene in age (20–25 My B.P.) ‘Loarinnah’ (Milligan 1859). Famous Tasmanian and are from the Riversleigh deposits in north­ Aboriginal chief Mannalargenna from the East western Queensland (Vickers­Rich et al. 1991). Coast of Tasmania called the thylacine ‘Cab­ It is speculated that competition with introduced berr­one­nen­er’, while Truganinni and Worrady, dingoes in mainland Australia may have caused (Bruny Island) called it ‘Can­nen­ner’. their extinction in mainland Australia during The thylacine is the state logo for Tasmania. the last 5000 years. The most recent remains of The title of the journal ‘Kanunnah’ commem­ thylacines in mainland Australia were dated at orates the Tasmanian Aboriginal word used just over 3000 years old (Archer 1974). by tribes from southern Tasmania for the The thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus) in thylacine. Tasmania coexisted with Aboriginal people for millennia. The arrival of Europeans in Archer M (1974) New information about the Tasmania resulted, in just over a hundred years, Quaternary distribution of the thylacine in the extinction of thylacines from their last (Marsupialia: Thylacinidae) in Australia. refuge. The demise of the thylacine resulted in Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of the extinction of an entire lineage of marsupials Western Australia 57: 43–50. from the planet. Milligan J (1859) Vocabulary of dialects of To the Aboriginal people of Tasmania the Aboriginal Tribes of Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes and Continuations: the Post-Penal
    97 CHANGES AND CONTINUATIONS : THE POST-PENAL SETTLEMENT OF TASMAN PENINSULA, 1877-1914 by Peter MacFie Port Arthur Conservation Project The history of Tasman Peninsula during the initial post-penal period from 1877-1914 is presented and discussed. Settlement of the peninsula after the closure of Port Arthur prison resulted in two distinct communities - one providing recreation facilities and services to tourists and the other dependent on farming, orcharding, logging and fishing. During this period Tasmanians began to come to terms with the convict history represented by Port Arthur, with Eaglehawk Neck and Port Arthur becoming foci for the developing tourism industry. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Port Arthur, post-penal settlement, free settlers. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS HISTORY ENOUGH? PA S1: PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA. Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 97-106. INTRODUCTION (3) the migration of free settlers from around the Derwent estuary to the northern Peninsula; 1877 is seen as a watershed in the history of Tasman (4) the concurrentdevelopment of free-settlement and Peninsula. Waterlocked land, retained as a prison since religious fundamentalism; 1830, was open to free settlers. No area better (5) a continuing and distinct personality for Port epitomises the quandary facing Tasmanians over their Arthur; past than Tasman Peninsula. In virgin forests of the (6) development of a long-realised commercial northwest and northeast, such reminders could be potential based on primary resources and building forgotten. The new settlers who arrived after the materials; closure of Port Arthur were faced with unavoidable (7) the gradual growth of tourism centres at Port reminders.
    [Show full text]