New Evidence on the Chronology of the “Anahita Temple”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Evidence on the Chronology of the “Anahita Temple” Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLIV, 2009 doi: 10.2143/IA.44.0.2034383 NEW EVIDENCE ON THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE “ANAHITA TEMPLE” BY Massoud AZARNOUSH (Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, Tehran) Abstract: Partly standing-partly excavated remains of a monument in Kangavar, a town in western Iran between Hamadan and Kermanshah, have been dated to the Seleucid and/or Parthian periods. In an article published in 1981, nevertheless, M. Azarnoush argues in favour of a late Sasanian date for this site. The discovery of a brick under the massive masonry of the western platform of the monument in the course of later excavations provided the possibility for thermoluminescence dating of this sample. The TL reading of the brick confi rms the Sasanian date of the monument. The present article intends to assess this and some other new information about the site. Keywords: W-Iran, Kangavar, Anahita Temple, Sasanian, chronology I- Introduction In an article published in 1981, I argued in favour of a late Sasanian date for the monument of Kangavar, frequently labelled the “Anahita Temple” (Azarnoush 1981: 69-94, Pl. 12-19). By that time I had completed two seasons of excavations on this site, following fi ve seasons of work headed by Seyfollâh-e Kâmbakhsh-e Fard, another Iranian archaeologist of whose expeditions I am certainly honoured to have been a member. Reasons backing the new chronology may be outlined in the following: – Isidor of Charax is the oldest author who mentions the presence of an Artemis Temple in Concobar, most probably the Greek pronunciation for the Iranian Kangavar. For the reasons explained in my article (Azarnoush 1981: 82-84) I have suggested that the identifi cation of the Artemis Temple of Concobar with that of Anahita is a misinterpretation of Isidor’s writings. In addition, there is not a single piece of evidence in favour of an iden- tifi cation of the remains under discussion as those of the Artemis Temple mentioned by Isidor. 11504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10 339393 220-03-20090-03-2009 112:54:072:54:07 394 M. AZARNOUSH – Unlike Kambakhsh-e Fard, the excavator of the Parthian-early Sasanian cemetery on the eastern slopes of the hill — next to the eastern platform of the monument, who considers the presence of this graveyard as a proof of the sanctity of the site, I have argued that this cemetery was not different from other cemeteries of this period. Parthian cemeteries so far excavated in the region, from Hamadan to Kermanshah, have been established on wastelands. There is therefore no reason why this ceme- tery should have been different. During the Parthian-early Sasanian periods, therefore, this place must have been a desolate land (Azarnoush 1981: 82-84) – Texier, Flandin and Coste are at the head of a long list of authors who date the monument to the Seleucid and/or Parthian periods. They con- sider the style of masonry in Kangavar to be Greek, albeit to varying degrees — from “exceptionally close to the Attic order” to “impure and degenerate”. The date of the monument, therefore, was basically estab- lished on stylistic considerations. I argued that these stylistic comparisons and conclusions do not with- stand more rigorous study. The style of the masonry in Kangavar may be more closely compared with that of Taq-e Garrâ, a small monument usually attributed to the late Sasanian period and the horseshoe arch which is narrowly comparable to those of sixth-seventh century Syrian works (Azarnoush 1981: 78-82, 90). – While the proportions between various elements of the Greek orders, including those of the height and diameter, of the base, shaft, and the capital, are of utmost importance to their “Greekness”; in the columns of Kangavar these proportions are so dissimilar to the Greek orders pro- portion that no real analogy is conceivable. The proportions of the columns of Kangavar are akin to the pillars in some late Sasanian-Early Islamic excavated monuments (Azarnoush 1981: 89-90). – A considerable number of stone pieces, both worked and untouched, bear mason marks. Some of these are single words, in Middle Persian, inscribed on the inner faces of masonry blocks. These are dated on the scripts’ stylistic characteristics, by Richard Frye and Vladimir Lukonin, respectively, to the Middle and Late Sasanian periods. 11504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10 339494 220-03-20090-03-2009 112:54:072:54:07 CHRONOLOGY OF THE “ANAHITA TEMPLE” 395 For Kambakhsh-e Fard, the excavator, these inscriptions are proof of the reparations that the “Anahita Temple” underwent during the Sasanian period (Azarnoush 1981: 91-92). This is an unlikely possibility, since marking the repaired parts in a monument, in a way that it would be distinguishable from the original parts of the monument under repara- tion, is an extremely new idea, almost certainly unknown in the Sasa- nian period1. – Last but not least, Iranian and Arab historians/geographers unanimously date the monument to the reign of Khosrow II (A.D. 590-628) (Azarnoush 1981: 69-70, 84-85). Although this point in itself may be of little weight in the present discussion, yet, added to the abovementioned, it provides additional arguments in favour of my suggestion. Mainly for these reasons, and in disagreement with previous opinions, I concluded that: 1- The monument in Kangavar should be dated to the late Sasanian period, most probably to the reign of Khosrow II. In addition: 2- I suggested a hypothetical reconstruction. On the basis of one impost block discovered in the southwest corner of the monument and belong- ing to the hance of an arch, I proposed that arches similar to that of Taq-e Garrâ may have spanned the spaces between columns/pillars, cre- ating an arcade (Azarnoush 1981: 82, fi gs. 8-9). This point, too, was in disagreement with the fl at roof suggested by Texier and accepted unanimously. 1 It would imply that the Sasanians were so familiar with modern conceptions of repa- ration and reconstruction of ancient monuments that they respected all modern standards in this regard; that is, when they repaired the “Anahita Temple” in Kangavar they care- fully dismounted the platforms, made the necessary reparations while putting their marks on the new pieces of masonry so that the new pieces would be distinguishable from the old ones, and then put the Greek styled columns back on their original locations! 11504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10 339595 220-03-20090-03-2009 112:54:072:54:07 396 M. AZARNOUSH 3- Finally, in a lecture delivered to a colloquium organized by the fourth expedition in Kangavar (Mehryâr & Kabiri 2004: 254-257) I argued that the construction might have remained incomplete2. II- New Evidence Once my excavations came to an abrupt end in 1979, in 1985 a third expe- dition was organized, headed by Ali-e Valinouri and lasting one season. Afterwards, a fourth expedition, this time under the joint supervision of architect Mohammad-e Mehryâr and archaeologist Ahmad-e Kabiri, worked for several years, from 1988 to 2001. Alongside several seasons of excava- tions they also concentrated on conservation and reconstruction works. A report of their activities was subsequently published (Mehryâr & Kabiri 2004). This publication includes new evidence in favour of the triple con- clusions I had reached, as mentioned above. Here I intend to assess the new information. II-1- Chronology While making the preliminary investigations and damage evaluation on part of the western platform, in 1999 the fourth expedition came across a brick fi rmly embedded in gypsum mortar and situated, under the heavy stone blocks and gypsum masonry of the platform, directly on the bedrock. It was located at the end of a test trench (Mehryâr & Kabiri 2004: 297) about 4.20 to 4.90 m. east of the still standing blocks of the platform’s façade (fi gs. 1-3). The discovery of this brick provided the expedition with an unexpected opportunity to go beyond the relative, and disputed, chro- nology of site. The brick, therefore, was sent to the laboratories of Research Center for Conservation of Cultural Relics, ICHTO, for thermolumines- cence dating. The TL reading on the brick gave an age of 1570 ± 140. If we add the 140 years of deviation to the proposed age of the brick we obtain a date within the ruling years of the Sasanian king Khosrow I (A.D. 531-578), but if we subtract the deviation we will obtain a date within 2 In this lecture I also suggested that a strong infl uence of Late Antique “Syrian” craftsmanship can be detected in the masonry of the monument in Kangavar. Unfortu- nately the proceedings of this gathering remain unpublished. 11504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10 339696 220-03-20090-03-2009 112:54:082:54:08 CHRONOLOGY OF THE “ANAHITA TEMPLE” 397 Fig. 1. Kangavar. General plan of the complex (Azarnoush 1981). 11504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10504-08_Iran_Antiqua_44_10 339797 220-03-20090-03-2009 112:54:082:54:08 398 M. AZARNOUSH Fig. 2. Kangavar. Plan of test trench (based on Mehryâr & Kabiri 2004: Plan 13a). the ruling years of the Sasanian king Bahram II (A.D. 276-293) (Mehryâr & Kabiri 2004: 115-116, 296-297; Bahrololoumi 2004: 297-298). It is obvious that this would be the date of burning the brick and may not be extended to the entire monument. In addition dating tests on only one sample would be hardly conclusive (Mehryâr & Kabiri 2004). We certainly need more samples, if available, to be tested. Nevertheless, the whole range of probable ages of the tested brick fall well within the Sasanian period, from A.D. 276 to A.D. 578, and if we consider the result reliable, the reign of Bahram II may be taken as terminus a quo for the construction of the monument of Kangavar.
Recommended publications
  • Spatial Epidemiology of Rabies in Iran
    Aus dem Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut eingereicht über den Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Spatial Epidemiology of Rabies in Iran Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Veterinärmedizin an der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Rouzbeh Bashar Tierarzt aus Teheran, Iran Berlin 2019 Journal-Nr.: 4015 'ĞĚƌƵĐŬƚŵŝƚ'ĞŶĞŚŵŝŐƵŶŐĚĞƐ&ĂĐŚďĞƌĞŝĐŚƐsĞƚĞƌŝŶćƌŵĞĚŝnjŝŶ ĚĞƌ&ƌĞŝĞŶhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚćƚĞƌůŝŶ ĞŬĂŶ͗ hŶŝǀ͘ͲWƌŽĨ͘ƌ͘:ƺƌŐĞŶĞŶƚĞŬ ƌƐƚĞƌ'ƵƚĂĐŚƚĞƌ͗ WƌŽĨ͘ƌ͘&ƌĂŶnj:͘ŽŶƌĂƚŚƐ ǁĞŝƚĞƌ'ƵƚĂĐŚƚĞƌ͗ hŶŝǀ͘ͲWƌŽĨ͘ƌ͘DĂƌĐƵƐŽŚĞƌƌ ƌŝƚƚĞƌ'ƵƚĂĐŚƚĞƌ͗ Wƌ͘<ĞƌƐƚŝŶŽƌĐŚĞƌƐ ĞƐŬƌŝƉƚŽƌĞŶ;ŶĂĐŚͲdŚĞƐĂƵƌƵƐͿ͗ ZĂďŝĞƐ͕DĂŶ͕ŶŝŵĂůƐ͕ŽŐƐ͕ƉŝĚĞŵŝŽůŽŐLJ͕ƌĂŝŶ͕/ŵŵƵŶŽĨůƵŽƌĞƐĐĞŶĐĞ͕/ƌĂŶ dĂŐĚĞƌWƌŽŵŽƚŝŽŶ͗Ϯϴ͘Ϭϯ͘ϮϬϭϵ ŝďůŝŽŐƌĂĨŝƐĐŚĞ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĚĞƌĞƵƚƐĐŚĞŶEĂƚŝŽŶĂůďŝďůŝŽƚŚĞŬ ŝĞĞƵƚƐĐŚĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂůďŝďůŝŽƚŚĞŬǀĞƌnjĞŝĐŚŶĞƚĚŝĞƐĞWƵďůŝŬĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĚĞƌĞƵƚƐĐŚĞŶEĂƚŝŽŶĂůďŝͲ ďůŝŽŐƌĂĨŝĞ͖ ĚĞƚĂŝůůŝĞƌƚĞ ďŝďůŝŽŐƌĂĨŝƐĐŚĞ ĂƚĞŶ ƐŝŶĚ ŝŵ /ŶƚĞƌŶĞƚ ƺďĞƌ фŚƚƚƉƐ͗ͬͬĚŶď͘ĚĞх ĂďƌƵĨďĂƌ͘ /^E͗ϵϳϴͲϯͲϴϲϯϴϳͲϵϳϮͲϯ ƵŐů͗͘ĞƌůŝŶ͕&ƌĞŝĞhŶŝǀ͕͘ŝƐƐ͕͘ϮϬϭϵ ŝƐƐĞƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕&ƌĞŝĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚćƚĞƌůŝŶ ϭϴϴ ŝĞƐĞƐtĞƌŬŝƐƚƵƌŚĞďĞƌƌĞĐŚƚůŝĐŚŐĞƐĐŚƺƚnjƚ͘ ůůĞ ZĞĐŚƚĞ͕ ĂƵĐŚ ĚŝĞ ĚĞƌ mďĞƌƐĞƚnjƵŶŐ͕ ĚĞƐ EĂĐŚĚƌƵĐŬĞƐ ƵŶĚ ĚĞƌ sĞƌǀŝĞůĨćůƚŝŐƵŶŐ ĚĞƐ ƵĐŚĞƐ͕ ŽĚĞƌ dĞŝůĞŶ ĚĂƌĂƵƐ͕ǀŽƌďĞŚĂůƚĞŶ͘<ĞŝŶdĞŝůĚĞƐtĞƌŬĞƐĚĂƌĨŽŚŶĞƐĐŚƌŝĨƚůŝĐŚĞ'ĞŶĞŚŵŝŐƵŶŐĚĞƐsĞƌůĂŐĞƐŝŶŝƌŐĞŶĚĞŝŶĞƌ&Žƌŵ ƌĞƉƌŽĚƵnjŝĞƌƚŽĚĞƌƵŶƚĞƌsĞƌǁĞŶĚƵŶŐĞůĞŬƚƌŽŶŝƐĐŚĞƌ^LJƐƚĞŵĞǀĞƌĂƌďĞŝƚĞƚ͕ǀĞƌǀŝĞůĨćůƚŝŐƚŽĚĞƌǀĞƌďƌĞŝƚĞƚǁĞƌĚĞŶ͘ ŝĞ tŝĞĚĞƌŐĂďĞ ǀŽŶ 'ĞďƌĂƵĐŚƐŶĂŵĞŶ͕ tĂƌĞŶďĞnjĞŝĐŚŶƵŶŐĞŶ͕ ƵƐǁ͘ ŝŶ ĚŝĞƐĞŵ tĞƌŬ ďĞƌĞĐŚƚŝŐƚ ĂƵĐŚ ŽŚŶĞ ďĞƐŽŶĚĞƌĞ <ĞŶŶnjĞŝĐŚŶƵŶŐ ŶŝĐŚƚ njƵ ĚĞƌ ŶŶĂŚŵĞ͕ ĚĂƐƐ ƐŽůĐŚĞ EĂŵĞŶ ŝŵ ^ŝŶŶĞ ĚĞƌ tĂƌĞŶnjĞŝĐŚĞŶͲ
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence, Risk Factors and Symptoms Associated to Intestinal Parasite Infections Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Disorders in Nahavand, Western Iran
    Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2016;58:42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201658042 ORIGINAL ARTICLE PREVALENCE, RISK FACTORS AND SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED TO INTESTINAL PARASITE INFECTIONS AMONG PATIENTS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS IN NAHAVAND, WESTERN IRAN Hamed KIANI(1,2), Ali HAGHIGHI(1), Ali ROSTAMI(1), Eznollah AZARGASHB(2,3), Seyyed Javad SEYYED TABAEI(1), Abbas SOLGI(4) & Nozhat ZEBARDAST(1) SUMMARY We studied the prevalence of intestinal parasites (IPs), their risk factors and associated symptoms among patients with gastrointestinal disorders. A total of 1,301 participants aged 22 days-90 years were enrolled in this study. We used a structured questionnaire to obtain socio-demographic and stool examination to investigate intestinal parasite infections. Data analysis was performed using SPSS16. The overall prevalence of intestinal parasites (IPs) was 32.2% (419/1,301). Three hundred and fifty nine cases/1,301 (27.6%) were infected with a single parasite and 60/1,301 cases (4.6%) presented polyparasitism. The most common IP was Blastocystis sp. 350/1,301 (26.9%), followed by Entamoeba coli 38/1,301 (2.92%), Giardia lamblia 30/1,301 (2.3%) and Cryptosporidium spp. 17/1,301 (1.3%). Regarding the socio-demographic variables, educational status (p = 0.001), contact with domestic animals and soil (p = 0.02), age above 15 years (p = 0.001) and seasons (p = 0.001) were significantly associated to intestinal parasitic infections. Concerning clinical characteristics, the presence of IPs was significantly associated to diarrhea (OR = 1.57; CI 95% = 1.24-1.98; p < 0.001) and dysentery (OR = 1.94; CI 95% = 1.03-3.66; p < 0.04).
    [Show full text]
  • Mayors for Peace Member Cities 2021/10/01 平和首長会議 加盟都市リスト
    Mayors for Peace Member Cities 2021/10/01 平和首長会議 加盟都市リスト ● Asia 4 Bangladesh 7 China アジア バングラデシュ 中国 1 Afghanistan 9 Khulna 6 Hangzhou アフガニスタン クルナ 杭州(ハンチォウ) 1 Herat 10 Kotwalipara 7 Wuhan ヘラート コタリパラ 武漢(ウハン) 2 Kabul 11 Meherpur 8 Cyprus カブール メヘルプール キプロス 3 Nili 12 Moulvibazar 1 Aglantzia ニリ モウロビバザール アグランツィア 2 Armenia 13 Narayanganj 2 Ammochostos (Famagusta) アルメニア ナラヤンガンジ アモコストス(ファマグスタ) 1 Yerevan 14 Narsingdi 3 Kyrenia エレバン ナールシンジ キレニア 3 Azerbaijan 15 Noapara 4 Kythrea アゼルバイジャン ノアパラ キシレア 1 Agdam 16 Patuakhali 5 Morphou アグダム(県) パトゥアカリ モルフー 2 Fuzuli 17 Rajshahi 9 Georgia フュズリ(県) ラージシャヒ ジョージア 3 Gubadli 18 Rangpur 1 Kutaisi クバドリ(県) ラングプール クタイシ 4 Jabrail Region 19 Swarupkati 2 Tbilisi ジャブライル(県) サルプカティ トビリシ 5 Kalbajar 20 Sylhet 10 India カルバジャル(県) シルヘット インド 6 Khocali 21 Tangail 1 Ahmedabad ホジャリ(県) タンガイル アーメダバード 7 Khojavend 22 Tongi 2 Bhopal ホジャヴェンド(県) トンギ ボパール 8 Lachin 5 Bhutan 3 Chandernagore ラチン(県) ブータン チャンダルナゴール 9 Shusha Region 1 Thimphu 4 Chandigarh シュシャ(県) ティンプー チャンディーガル 10 Zangilan Region 6 Cambodia 5 Chennai ザンギラン(県) カンボジア チェンナイ 4 Bangladesh 1 Ba Phnom 6 Cochin バングラデシュ バプノム コーチ(コーチン) 1 Bera 2 Phnom Penh 7 Delhi ベラ プノンペン デリー 2 Chapai Nawabganj 3 Siem Reap Province 8 Imphal チャパイ・ナワブガンジ シェムリアップ州 インパール 3 Chittagong 7 China 9 Kolkata チッタゴン 中国 コルカタ 4 Comilla 1 Beijing 10 Lucknow コミラ 北京(ペイチン) ラクノウ 5 Cox's Bazar 2 Chengdu 11 Mallappuzhassery コックスバザール 成都(チォントゥ) マラパザーサリー 6 Dhaka 3 Chongqing 12 Meerut ダッカ 重慶(チョンチン) メーラト 7 Gazipur 4 Dalian 13 Mumbai (Bombay) ガジプール 大連(タァリィェン) ムンバイ(旧ボンベイ) 8 Gopalpur 5 Fuzhou 14 Nagpur ゴパルプール 福州(フゥチォウ) ナーグプル 1/108 Pages
    [Show full text]
  • Hôtel Des Ventes De Saint-Dié
    Hôtel des Ventes de Saint-Dié SAMEDI 12 DECEMBRE 2020 à 14 HEURES VENTE AUX ENCHERES PUBLIQUES (SUR RESERVATION MAXI 30 PERSONNES EN SALLE) Maîtres Morel ESTAMPES DESSINS TABLEAUX, BRONZES et SCULPTURES, ETAINS du XVIIème, XVIIIème et XIXème siècles MEUBLES ET OBJETS D’ART XVIII, XIX et XXèmes s. ARTS DECORATIFS DU XXème siècle BIJOUX et MONTRE TAPIS Anne et Germain MOREL, 65, rue de la Prairie – 88100 SAINT-DIE DES- Commissaires-priseurs associés, VOSGES Successeurs de Maître Michel GUERIN Tél. : 03 29 56 13 34 - Fax : 03 29 56 99 9 e-mail : [email protected] Catalogue visible sur : www.interencheres.com 21,00 % TTC en sus des enchères (24,60 % TTC pour les acheteurs live) Dans le respect des mesures sanitaires. Modalités précisées en fonction de l’évolution sanitaire. Accès aux expositions et aux ventes soumis à conditions. Expositions publiques Vendredi 11 décembre de 14h à 17h Samedi 12 décembre de 10h à 12h Experts : Expert : Monsieur Jean-Claude COMMENCHAL pour les étains du n° 129 au n° 159 (Tél : 06 07 11 20 35 – [email protected]). Expert : Monsieur Patrice DUBOIS pour les dessins et tableaux anciens n°s 17B, 38, 180 à 186, 193, 196, 226 et 257. (Tél : 01 45 23 12 50 – [email protected]). Consultant : Monsieur Nicolas CONREUR, pour l’hélice POTEZ n° 85. (Tél : 06 19 57 51 19 - [email protected]). Expert : Cabinet LUCQIAUD pour la Grande Fine Champagne 1900 n° 71 (Tél : 05 56 44 64 65– [email protected]). ESTAMPES 1. BLOCH Marcel (1882-1966).
    [Show full text]
  • The Anahita Temple at Kangavar
    THE ANAHITA TEMPLE AT KANGAVAR The modern town of Kangavar, the site of the Anahita Temple, is situated midway between Hamadan and Kermanshah, on the main historical Hegmataneh-Ctesphon highway. The Temple has an area of 4.6 hectare and is located on a huge schist outcropping that overlooks the Kangavar plain. Like a number of other monumental buildings, the Anahita Temple is constructed on a platform, a technique common on the IRanian plateau in historical periods. The town of Kangavar is the principal population center in the vast plain of Kangavar. This fertile plain is surrounded from the north and northwest by the central Zagros ranges. The Chelmaran heights, the main stone quarry of the region, is located on the west, not far from the Temple. High annual precipitation provides the plain with ample irrigation water supplied by natural springs and the Gamasab river, the confluence of the Khurram-rud, the Asadabad, and te Kangavar rivers. As in many regions in Iran, these rivers and the natural springs have played an important role in the cultural development of the Kangavar plain from prehistoric to the present time. The flourishing prehistoric cultures of Seh-Gabi and Godin, whose type sites are located northeast of Kangavar, and the latter's economic and cultural contact with Susa are indicative of the importance of the region from the early Neolithic to the late Chalcolithic period. Southern view of Anahita Temple The strategic geographical location of the plain also played an important role as the commercial highway and locus of contact between the cultural centers on the west and east streching as far as Khorasan and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Interactions Between Prehistoric Societies of the Central
    Herausgeber*innenkollektiv, eds. 2021. Pearls, Politics and Pistachios. Essays in Anthropology and Memories on the Occasion of Susan Pollock’s 65th Birthday: 239–57. DOI: 10.11588/propylaeum.837.c10747. Cultural Interactions between Prehistoric Societies of the Central Iranian Plateau with Residents of the Central Zagros, Fars, and Southwestern Iran during the 5th Millennium BCE HASSAN FAZELI NASHLI,* PARISA NEKOUEI** & ROUHOLLAH YOUSEFI ZOSHK*** The North Central plateau and mountains in eastern Iran, and by the hot and Central Zagros regions during dry Dasht-e-Lut and Dasht-e-Kavir regions the 5th millennium BCE to the south (Badiei 1994, 93). This area, through the Shamshirbor Pass northeast of The North Central Iranian Plateau (see Bastam, includes all of the Gorgan plain, and Fig. 1) is a vast area, with an average some of the southern parts of Turkmenistan elevation of 1200 meters above sea level, and northeastern Iran (Malek-Shahmirzadi which was inhabited by modern humans from 2003, 317). Numerous plains are enclosed ca. 7200 BCE onwards. It is bounded to the by the southern limits of the Alborz, each of north by the Alborz Mountains, the Zagros which has its own cultural history; among the Mountains to the west, at its eastern limit by most important plains are the Tehran, Qazvin, Fig. 1. Map showing the locations of the most important 5th millennium BCE sites mentioned in the text. Map by the authors. * University of Tehran, Tehran (Iran) ** University of Tehran, Tehran (Iran) *** Islamic Azad University of Varamin, Varamin (Iran) Hassan Fazeli Nashli, Parisa Nekouei & Rouhollah Yousefi Zoshk Qom, and Kashan plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Tourism
    IRAN STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 1391 17. CULTURE AND TOURISM organization called ''Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization", the related data have been Introduction provided by the new organization. Data on pilgrims include only those dispatched by Hajj and Pilgrimage Organization. Definitions and concepts his chapter presents statistical information Production of radio and television on radio and television programmes, programmes:is a process in which the contextual Tpress, books and public libraries, cinemas, (massage) and structural componentsof the museums, monuments, touristsarrived and massage are incorporated artistically and pilgrims. Following paragraphs summarize the technically using required resources in order to be history of data collection in these areas. broadcast on TV, radio and the Internet. Regular data compilation on radio and television Radio and television broadcasting: refers to a programmes and museums began in the years produced and broadcast programme which can be 1345 and 1347 respectively. received by people on radio, TV and the Internet. The earliest data on movies available in the SCI National production and broadcast of date back to the year 1348. They were produced programme: refers to the programme produced by the Culture and Art Ministry, renamed the and broadcast for people in the country. Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance after International production and broadcast of the victory of the Islamic Revolution. programme: refers to the programme produced Comprehensive data collection on the press was and broadcast for overseas people. first accomplished by the SCI under the title of Radio and television network: is an "Review of the country’s publications survey" in organizational structure responsible for activities the year 1349.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood-Soaked Secrets Why Iran's 1988 Prison
    BLOOD-SOAKED SECRETS WHY IRAN’S 1988 PRISON MASSACRES ARE ONGOING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Collage of some of the victims of the mass prisoner killings of 1988 in Iran. (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. © Amnesty International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: MDE 13/9421/2018 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS GLOSSARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 METHODOLOGY 18 2.1 FRAMEWORK AND SCOPE 18 2.2 RESEARCH METHODS 18 2.2.1 TESTIMONIES 20 2.2.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE 22 2.2.3 AUDIOVISUAL EVIDENCE 23 2.2.4 COMMUNICATION WITH IRANIAN AUTHORITIES 24 2.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 25 BACKGROUND 26 3.1 PRE-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 26 3.2 POST-REVOLUTION REPRESSION 27 3.3 IRAN-IRAQ WAR 33 3.4 POLITICAL OPPOSITION GROUPS 33 3.4.1 PEOPLE’S MOJAHEDIN ORGANIZATION OF IRAN 33 3.4.2 FADAIYAN 34 3.4.3 TUDEH PARTY 35 3.4.4 KURDISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF IRAN 35 3.4.5 KOMALA 35 3.4.6 OTHER GROUPS 36 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkeolojik Verilerin Işiğinda Epi-Paleolitikten Tunç Çaği Sonuna Kadar Anadolu-Iran Ilişkileri
    Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Arkeoloji Anabilim Dalı ARKEOLOJİK VERİLERİN IŞIĞINDA EPİ-PALEOLİTİKTEN TUNÇ ÇAĞI SONUNA KADAR ANADOLU-İRAN İLİŞKİLERİ Bayram Aghalari Doktora Tezi Ankara, 2017 ARKEOLOJİK VERİLERİN IŞIĞINDA EPİ-PALEOLİTİKTEN TUNÇ ÇAĞI SONUNA KADAR ANADOLU-İRAN İLİŞKİLERİ Bayram Aghalari Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Arkeoloji Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi Ankara, 2017 KABUL VE ONAY BİLDİRİM YAYIMLAMA VE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI BEYANI ETİK BEYAN v TEŞEKKÜR Hacettepeli olduğum ilk günden beri beni yönlendiren, yardımlarını esirgemeyen, tez çalışmam konusunda tecrübe ve görüşlerinden yararlandığım danışman hocam Doç. Dr. Halil TEKİN'e sonsuz teşekkürlerimi sunarım. Tez izleme komitemde yer alan Hacettepe Üniversitesi arkeoloji bölüm başkanı Prof. Dr. Sevinç GÜNEL, Prof. Dr. Halime HÜRYILMAZ, Doç. Dr. Ayşegül AYKURT, Ankara Üniversitesi bölüm başkanı Prof. Dr. Tayfun YILDIRIM ve Prof. Dr. Fikri KULAKOĞLU'NA tez çalışmam boyunca bilgilerini benimle paylaşmaları, konuya farklı bakış açılarıyla katkıda bulunmalarından ve beni desteklemelerinden dolayı çok teşekkür ederim. Ayrıca ders aşamasında bilgilerinden yararlandığım bütün Hacettepe Arkeoloji bölümü öğretim üyeleri ve görevlilerine teşekkürlerimi bildirmek isterim. Tez çalışmam boyunca yararlandığım İngiliz Arkeoloji Enstitüsü (BIAA) elemanlarına derin teşekkürlerimi bildirmek isterim. Yanı sıra araştırmanın uygulamasını gerçekleştirdiğim süre içinde teknik yardım ve desteklerini gördüğüm Türk ve İranlı arkadaşlarıma da teşekkür ederim. Maddi Manevi desteklerini esirgemeyen hayatımın her anında yanımda olan, Eğitim ve öğretim hayatım boyunca beni her yönden destekleyen, sevgili aileme derin teşekkürlerim sonsuzdur. vi ÖZET AGHALARİ, Bayram. Arkeolojik verilerin ışığında Epi-Paleolitikten Tunç Çağları sonuna kadar Anadolu-İran ilişkileri, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 2017. Yukarıda belirtildiği başlıklı bu çalışmada Ön Asya'nın iki önemli coğrafi bölgesi olarak Anadolu-İran ilişki ve bağlantıları Epi-Paleolitik dönemden itibaren ele alınmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Archaeologists Vol
    International Journal of the Society of Iranian Archaeologists Vol. 2, No. 4, Summer- Autumn 2016 An Analytical Study on the Bronze Age Cultures of Harsin, Kermanshah Province (Iran) Parisa Naseri University of Shahrekord Mohammad Eghbal Chehri Islamic Azad University Received: May, 30, 2016 Accepted: October, 21, 2016 Abstract: Despite the fact that the prehistoric period and particularly the Bronze Age in Central Zagros have been well studied and identified to some extent, no systematic research has been conducted by foreign or Iranian archeologists on the subject of Harsin County. A total of 29 sites belonging to the Bronze Age have been identified in the archeological investigation of the region between 2002 and 2010. Based on the surface findings, all of these sites belong to the Middle and Late Bronze Age. Furthermore, it was discovered that most of these sites formed on the banks of permanent and seasonal rivers and lakes. As for the extent of residential sites of Bronze Age in the region and their location, it is implied that there were rather important and large sites along with small villages, indicating close relationships with the neighboring regions at the end of the third millennium and the beginning of the second millennium B.C. (Middle Bronze Age). The significance of the current study lies in the fact that no evidence was obtained from the Early Bronze Age (Yanik Culture), while the region has maintained numerous cultural relationships with the neighboring areas such as Kangavar with ceramics such as Godin III, Mahidasht and Lorestan from the Middle to Late Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiger-Moths of Iran 481-525 Atalanta (Dezember 2005) 36 (3/4): 481-525, Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 36 Autor(en)/Author(s): Dubatolov Vladimir V., Zahiri Reza Artikel/Article: Tiger-moths of Iran 481-525 Atalanta (Dezember 2005) 36 (3/4): 481-525, Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 Tiger-moths o f Iran (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae: Arctiinae) by V l a d im ir V. D u b a t o l o v & R e z a Z a h ir i received 26.X.2005 Abstract: Based on the vast material from the collection of the Hayk Mirzayans Insect Museum (HMIM) and literature data, 28 species are recorded from Iran. Callimorpha dominula rossica K o l ., Axiopoena kareliniMtu., Utetheisa lotrixCr ., Watsonarctia deserta B a r t ., Diaphora mendica C l . are recorded from this country for the first time. Four new subspecies, Arctia caja mazandarana subspec. nov. from the Caspian Coast, Eucharia festiva hormozgana subspec. nov. from South Iran, Watsonarctia deserta elbursica subspec. nov. from the Alburz Mts., and Pbragmatobia placida mirzayansi subspec. nov. with a pale coloration, from the high mountains of the Albourz are described. The analysis of the Arctiinae fauna shows that the fauna of South-Eastern Iran is the Oriental, and not Palearctic. Zusammenfassung: Mit Hilfe des reichhaltigen Materials des Hayk Mirzayans Insect Museum (HMIM) und aufgrund von Literaturangaben können 28 Arten für den Iran angegeben werden. Callimorpha dominula rossica K o l ., Axiopoena kareliniM £ n ., Utetheisa lotrix C r ., Watsonarctia deserta B a r t ., Diaphora mendica C l . werden erstmals für dieses Land gemeldet.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia Iraq
    40°0’0"E 42°30’0"E 45°0’0"E 47°30’0"E Yalnizbag Gasankend Sovetlyar Chakhar Gëkharli Te rc a n Anitli Balik Golu Suveren DZHERMUK Martuni Moranly Cayirli Hacibekir Eleskirt Eleskirtcilikân Karaköse Igdir Ararat Ararat Kyarki Vayots Dzor Gndevaz Pichanis Nagorno-karabakh Bejladjan Imamverdili Vtoroye Erzincan ERZINCAN Tepsicik Ahura Ger-Ger Saatly Sädäräk Malishka Armenia Zhdanovsk AkhmedliChakhirly Areni Ghai-kend Borisovka Minkend Armenia Bozoglak Alpkoy Pencirikkomu Te km a n Karayazi Tasliçay Golyuzu Golu Soylan Shusha Farsabad Frunze Tanyeri Günesgören Girberan AzerbaijanAzerbaijan Latchin Imichli Öztürkân Azatek Azizbekov Kargin Magara Haciomer Ilich Dyg Kemah Erzincan Caglayan Gokoglan Tutak Almalu Angekhakot Sisian AzerbaijanAzerbaijan Ordzhonikidze Bilesuvar Agri Diyadin Charchibogan Bartsruni Karacan Dogubayazit Zarkatun Kirovka Pulumur Erzurum Cherur Goris Aslanduz Novograzhdanovka Eskigedik Kasikli Karaseyidali Kagnili Khandek Fizuli Chalmeh Sürbahan Bazargan Pus’yan Karabaglar Chakhbuz Tazagyukh Syunik Goradiz Eleskirt Babash Kandi Pushkino Agalykend Ovacik Balpayam Aktuzla Pirzeynel Sust Dzhagry Kargapazar Qendeal Shakhtakhty Shakhbuz Dastakert Tatev Kubatly Bilesevar Hinis Binpinar Maku Kubatly Moradlu Tazakend Sowf’ali Arafsa Djebrail Larijan Balkiri Karaoglan Holik Bileci Baglarpinari Çatma Bebek ArmeniaArmenia Caylar Patnos Vodokhranilishche Gidrouzla Araks Khanlyk Soltanly Djalilabad Novogolovka Nazimiye Karliova Bayro Tujipazar Alikeykhaly Var to Malazgirt Bayazitaga Dash Feshel Nakhichevan’ Djulfa Shabadin Kafan Tunceli
    [Show full text]