DOCSLIB.ORG

Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Improvements Project Initial Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Improvements Project Initial Study PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT September 2020 This page intentionally left blank PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Prepared for: City of Yorba Linda Public Works Department 4845 Casa Loma Avenue Yorba Linda, California 92886 Contact: Tony Wang, Traffic Engineering Manager (714) 961-7170 Under contract to: HNTB Corporation Patrick Somerville, P.E. 200 East Sandpointe Avenue, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707 (714) 460-1600 Prepared by: LSA 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 September 2020 This page intentionally left blank . I NITIAL S TUDY/MITIGATED N EGATIVE D ECLARATION Y ORBA L INDA B OULEVARD W IDENING I MPROVEMENTS P ROJECT S EPTEMBER 2020 Y ORBA L INDA, C ALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ........................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary of Findings ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Approval ................................................................................................................ 1-2 2.0 PROJECT SETTING AND DESCRIPTION ............................................................... 2-1 2.1 Project Location ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Environmental Setting ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Project Characteristics ...................................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 Other Improvements ....................................................................................................... 2-18 2.5 Maximum Disturbance Limits ......................................................................................... 2-18 2.6 Right-of-Way Acquisitions ............................................................................................... 2-19 2.7 Construction Activities and Access ................................................................................. 2-19 2.8 Project Schedule .............................................................................................................. 2-19 2.9 Agreements, Permits, and Approvals .............................................................................. 2-20 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ........................................ 3-1 3.1 Determination ................................................................................................................... 3-1 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................... 4-1 4.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................... 4-3 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................. 4-6 4.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................ 4-18 4.5 Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................... 4-64 4.6 Energy .............................................................................................................................. 4-68 4.7 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................ 4-70 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................. 4-78 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials................................................................................... 4-83 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 4-91 4.11 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................. 4-103 4.12 Mineral Resources ......................................................................................................... 4-106 4.13 Noise.............................................................................................................................. 4-108 4.14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................ 4-126 4.15 Public Services ............................................................................................................... 4-128 4.16 Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 4-131 4.17 Transportation .............................................................................................................. 4-133 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources .............................................................................................. 4-138 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ......................................................................................... 4-140 4.20 Wildfire .......................................................................................................................... 4-145 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .............................................................................. 4-148 5.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 5-1 P:\HNT1901.02 - Yorba Linda\Draft ISMND\Draft ISMND_Yorba Linda Blvd Widening Improvements Project_9.18.20.docx «09/18/20» i Y ORBA L INDA B OULEVARD W IDENING I MPROVEMENTS P ROJECT I NITIAL S TUDY/MITIGATED N EGATIVE D ECLARATION Y ORBA L INDA, C ALIFORNIA S EPTEMBER 2020 FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location ................................................................................................................... 2-3 Figure 2: Project Features ................................................................................................................... 2-9 Figure 3: Vegetation .......................................................................................................................... 4-21 Figure 4: Santa Ana Sucker Critical Habitat ...................................................................................... 4-37 Figure 5: Jurisdictional Features (CDFW) .......................................................................................... 4-39 Figure 6: Jurisdictional Features (USACE) ......................................................................................... 4-41 Figure 7: SARCHMP ........................................................................................................................... 4-45 Figure 8: Anaheim HMP .................................................................................................................... 4-47 Figure 9: Modeled Receptor Locations ........................................................................................... 4-113 TABLES Table 2.3.A: Planned Projects ............................................................................................................. 2-6 Table 4.3.A: SCAQMD Significance Thresholds ................................................................................. 4-12 Table 4.3.B: Peak Daily Construction Emissions ............................................................................... 4-13 Table 4.3.C: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis ...................................................................... 4-15 Table 4.4.A: Impacts to Vegetation and Land Cover Types .............................................................. 4-50 Table 4.4.B: Impacts to Jurisdictional Aquatic Resources ................................................................. 4-53 Table 4.6.A: Construction Energy Consumption ............................................................................... 4-68 Table 4.8.A: Project Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................... 4-81 Table 4.13.A: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels .......................................................... 4-109 Table 4.13.B: Exterior Traffic Noise Levels ...................................................................................... 4-121 Table 4.13.C: Interior Traffic Noise Levels ...................................................................................... 4-122 Table 4.13.D: Construction Vibration Levels ................................................................................... 4-123 Table 4.13.E: Yorba Linda Boulevard Project Level of Service Summary ........................................ 4-135 APPENDICES (ON CD) A: IS/MND DISTRIBUTION LIST B: NOTICE OF INTENT C: AIR QUALITY DATA SHEETS D: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT E: CULTURAL RESOURCE RECORD SEARCH RESULTS F: STRUCTURE PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT G: LACM FOSSIL LOCALITY SEARCH H: INITIAL SITE ASSESSMENT I: AB 52 CONSULTATION LETTER J: PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT K: FHWA TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL PRINTOUTS L: TRAFFIC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section Header
    SECTION HEADER 2009 NLL Media Guide and Record Book 1 SECTION HEADER Follow the Entire 2010 NLL Season Live on the NLL Network at NLL.com 2010 NLL MEDIA GUIDE Table of Contents NLL Introduction Table of Contents/Staff Directory ........................1 Gait Introduction to the NLL.......................................2 2010 Division and Playoff Formats......................3 Lacrosse Talk.......................................................4 Team Information Boston Blazers .................................................5-9 Buffalo Bandits............................................10-16 Calgary Roughnecks ....................................17-22 Colorado Mammoth.....................................23-29 Edmonton Rush ...........................................30-34 Minnesota Swarm........................................35-40 Orlando Titans..............................................41-45 Philadelphia Wings......................................46-52 Rochester Knighthawks ...............................53-59 Toronto Rock................................................60-65 Washington Stealth.....................................66-71 History and Records League Award Winners and Honors .............72-73 League All-Pros............................................74-78 All-Rookie Teams ..............................................79 Individual Records/Coaching Records ...............80 National Lacrosse League All-Time Single-Season Records........................81 Staff Directory Yearly Leaders..............................................82-83
    [Show full text]
  • S L Acrosse a Lmanac
    Adelphi University Athletics 2012 Men’s Lacrosse Northeast-10 Conference Quick Facts The Northeast-10 Conference is an NCAA Divi- pionships in women’s basketball, field hockey, sion II conference that was established in 1979. men’s lacrosse, women’s lacrosse, men’s soccer, The NE-10 currently consists of 16 institutions women’s track & field and men’s and women’s throughout the Northeast including Connecticut, swimming & diving. University Information Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Location: Garden City, N.Y. Vermont. The Northeast-10 has a strong history of nation- Founded: 1896 ally ranked teams in all sports. In the 2008-2009 Enrollment: Over 8,500 The institutions that make up the Northeast-10 academic year the conference had 63 different President: Dr. Robert A. Scott include Adelphi University (Garden City, N.Y.), teams representing 14 institutions advance to Athletic Director: Robert E. Hartwell American International College (Springfield, NCAA postseason play. Assoc. Athletic Director/SWA: Kate Whalen Mass.), Assumption College (Worcester, Mass.), Conference: Northeast-10 Bentley University (Waltham, Mass.), Franklin The Northeast-10 had teams advance to the Affiliation: NCAA Division II Pierce University (Rindge, N.H.), Le Moyne national championship game in field hockey, Home Field: Motamed Field College (Syracuse, N.Y.), University of Mas- women’s basketball and men’s lacrosse. The Nickname: Panthers sachusetts Lowell (Lowell, Mass.), Merrimack UMass Lowell field hockey team made their School Colors: Brown and Gold College (North Andover, Mass.), University of fourth finals appearance in the last six years last Athletic Department Phone: (516) 877-4240 New Haven (West Haven, Conn.), Pace Univer- fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing an Expansion Strategy for a Professional Sports League Christopher R
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Summer 2013 Leveling the Playing Field: Developing an Expansion Strategy for a Professional Sports League Christopher R. Herbel Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation Herbel, Christopher R., "Leveling the Playing Field: Developing an Expansion Strategy for a Professional Sports League" (2013). Research Papers. Paper 411. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/411 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD: DEVELOPING AN EXPANSION STRATEGY FOR A PROFESSIONAL SPORTS LEAGUE By Christopher R. Herbel B.S., Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2002 A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Department of Mass Communication and Media Arts in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale August 2013 RESEARCH PAPER APPROVAL LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD: DEVELOPING AN EXPANSION STRATEGY FOR A PROFESSIONAL SPORTS LEAGUE By Christopher R. Herbel A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the field of Professional Media and Media Management Approved by: Dr. Narayanan Iyer, Chair Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale June 7, 2013 AN ABSTRACT OF THE RESEARCH PAPER OF CHRISTOPHER R. HERBEL, for the Master of Science degree in PROFESSIONAL MEDIA AND MEDIA MANAGEMENT, presented on JUNE 7, 2013, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Honors Year-By-Year Records Year Overall Pct
    MEDIA AND RECRUITING GUIDE 49 HISTORY AND HONORS YEAR-BY-YEAR RECORDS Year Overall Pct. ACC Pct. Finish ACC Tourn. Coach Post-Season/Awards Year Overall Pct. ACC Pct. Finish ACC Tourn. Coach Post-Season/Awards 1924 5-2 .714 R.V. Truitt 1965 11-2 .846 3-0 1.000 1st Al Heagy 1925 4-1-1 .750 R.V. Truitt 1966 9-1 .900 3-0 1.000 1st John Howard 1926 7-1 .875 R.V. Truitt 1967 8-1 .889 2-0 1.000 1st John Howard Nat'l Co-Champions 1927 6-4 .600 R.V. Truitt 1968 8-1-1 .850 2-0 1.000 1st John Howard 1928 9-1 .900 Jack Faber Gold Medal (w/Rutgers, JHU) 1969 7-4 .636 1-1 .500 2nd John Howard 1929 9-2 .818 Jack Faber USILA Runner-Up 1970 6-4 .600 2-1 .667 2nd Bud Beardmore 1930 8-1 .889 Jack Faber USILA Runner-Up 1971 9-4 .692 1-1 .500 2nd Bud Beardmore NCAA Finalists 1931 8-1 .889 Jack Faber & Al Heagy Rated No.1 by USILA 1972 8-2 .800 2-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore NCAA Semifinals 1932 8-1 .889 Jack Faber & Al Heagy 1973 10-0 1.000 3-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore NCAA Champions 1933 5-1 .833 Jack Faber & Al Heagy USILA Runner-Up 1974 8-2 .800 3-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore NCAA Finalists 1934 3-2-1 .583 Jack Faber & Al Heagy 1975 8-2 .800 1-1 .500 3rd Bud Beardmore NCAA Champions 1935 6-1 .857 Jack Faber & Al Heagy USILA Runner-Up 1976 10-1 .909 2-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore NCAA Finalists 1936 7-0 1.000 Jack Faber & Al Heagy USILA Champions 1977 8-2 .800 3-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore NCAA Semifinals 1937 7-0 1.000 Jack Faber & Al Heagy USILA 1978 9-2 .818 4-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore NCAA Semifinals Co-Champions (w/Prin.) 1979 9-2 .818 4-0 1.000 1st Bud Beardmore
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Geomorphology of the Santa Ana Mountains
    Final Technical Report ACTIVE DEFORMATION AND EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL OF THE SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES BASIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Award Number: 01HQGR0117 Recipient’s name: University of California - Irvine Sponsored Projects Administration 160 Administration Building, Univ. of CA - Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-1875 Principal investigator: Lisa B. Grant, Ph.D. Department of Environmental Analysis & Design 262 Social Ecology 1 University of California Irvine, CA 92697-7070 Program element: Research on earthquake occurrence and effects Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number 01HQGR0117. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. p. 1 Award number: 01HQGR0117 ACTIVE DEFORMATION AND EARTHQUAKE POTENTIAL OF THE SOUTHERN LOS ANGELES BASIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Eldon M. Gath, University of California, Irvine, 143 Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA, 92697-7070; tel: 949-824-5382, fax: 949-824-2056, email: [email protected] Eric E. Runnerstrom, University of California, Irvine, 143 Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA, 92697- 7070; tel: 949-824-5382, fax: 949-824-2056, email: [email protected] Lisa B. Grant (P.I.), University of California, Irvine, 262 Social Ecology I, Irvine, CA, 92697- 7070; tel: 949-824-5491, fax: 949-824-2056, email: [email protected] TECHNICAL ABSTRACT The Santa Ana Mountains (SAM) are a 1.7 km high mountain range that form the southeastern boundary of the Los Angeles basin between Orange and Riverside counties in southern California. The SAM have three well developed erosional surfaces preserved on them, as well as a suite of four fluvial fill terraces preserved in Santiago Creek, which is a drainage trapped between the uplifting SAM and a parallel Loma Ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 061-002 Anaheim Magazine
    Addressing Anaheim’s Transportation Needs in the 21st Century A paid advertisement FROM THE DESK OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL To all Anaheim residents and businesses: In January, Judge Peter Polos of the Orange County Superior Court ruled that the Anaheim Angels may start the 2005 season as the “Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim” until the case brought by the City against the Angels goes to trial. The City of Anaheim is steadfast in its convictions that this attempt to change the team name by the current ownership violates the team’s lease for the City-owned stadium. At trial, the City and its legal team will be able to present additional compelling evidence that we believe will reverse this name change. The parties were restricted from presenting evidence at the preliminary hearings. The City has upheld its end of the 33-year stadium lease contract that was negotiated in 1996 and intends to do so until it expires in 2029. The deal provided the Anaheim Angels with additional parking, concession and stadium advertising revenue which the team owner has used to enhance the team. It also included $30 million that helped renovate Angel Stadium of Anaheim into one of the nation’s finest baseball facilities. The suit filed against the Angels Baseball L.P. simply asks that the team uphold its end of the bargain, provide the City with its negotiated benefits and keep Anaheim at its prominent place in the team’s name. Many of our residents and businesses, as well as baseball fans from throughout Southern California, solidly support the City’s position.
    [Show full text]
  • Marywood High School
    CULTURAL and PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY MARYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL City of Orange, Orange County, California CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY MARYWOOD HIGH SCHOOL City of Orange, Orange County, California Prepared for: Peter K. Carlson Vandermost & Carlson, Inc. 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A., Principal JM Research & Consulting 5110 Magnolia Avenue Riverside, CA 92506 USGS Quadrangle: 7.5-minute Orange, California 1964, rev 1981 Unsectioned area of Township 4 South, Range 9 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian Marywood Logo Credit: Marywood Alumnae Association September 2014 J M R C SEPTEMBER 2014 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY JM Research & Consulting (JMRC) is under contract to Vandermost & Carlson, Inc. to provide cultural and paleontological resources services for the proposed Marywood project in the City of Orange, Orange County, California. The proposed project includes the demolition of Marywood, originally a parochial high school under the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and most recently a pastoral center for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange, and the construction of 40 single-family residences (Appendix B). The approximately 15-acre property is located on one parcel (361-064-01) at 2811 East Villa Real Drive in the foothills on the west side of the Peralta Hills, and is surrounded by post- WWII and later tract home development (Figure 1). The purpose of this report is to document efforts made to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Marywood is not listed in the City of Orange’s Historic Resources Inventory and does not appear to have been previously studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Vegetation Mapping Update Phase II
    Orange County Vegetation Mapping Update Phase II FINAL VEGETATION MAPPING REPORT April 2015 Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Redlands, California Acknowledgements Mapping vegetation in Orange County, California was one of the most challenging efforts in our long history at Aerial Information Systems. The project would not have been possible without the funding and project management provided by the Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC). We are grateful for the opportunity to work with Milan Mitrovich, NROC project manager, who provided all the logistic planning and field coordination, in addition to his time in the field. We are also indebted to Todd Keeler- Wolf and Anne Klein, of the California Department of Fish & Wildlife who provided us their expertise and many invaluable hours in the field. We would also like to thank Jennifer Buck-Diaz, Julie Evens, Sara Taylor, Daniel Hastings and Jamie Ratchford of the California Native Plant Society, who provided the accuracy assessment of our vegetation database and mapping product, we appreciate all of their efforts. There were many more people and organizations that helped make this a successful project, and to all we are grateful. However, special thanks to Zach Principe of The Nature Conservancy, Cara Allen from the California Department of Fish & Wildlife, Will Miller from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Jutta Burger & Megan Lulow from the Irvine Ranch Conservancy, and Laura Cohen and Barbara Norton from the Orange County Parks Department for their support in the field. We are also grateful for a highly detailed map, by Rachael Woodfield from Merkel & Associates, which we incorporated into our final product, in addition to Peter Bowler who helped us with the marshlands on the University of California, Irvine.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Record Book
    HOFSTRA BOBBY CASEY RYAN TIERNEY RILEY FORTE 2021 RECORD BOOK KEEGAN SANTOS BRIAN HERBER KEEGAN SANTOS MICHAEL ALTMANN Harry Royle-Vincent Sombrotto Men’s Lacrosse Locker Room The Hofstra men’s lacrosse program unveiled its new Harry Royle-Vincent Sombrotto men’s lacrosse locker room in January 2020. The locker room renovation was made possible via a substantial leadership gift from James C. Metzger ’83. The renovation included the installation of 48 new lockers, a remodel of the bathroom and shower area, and new carpeting and flooring. Hollman, Inc., a leading manufacturer of collegiate lockers, designed and installed the new custom lockers, constructed specifically for use with lacrosse as they feature space to hold multiple helmets, sticks and are equipped with a phone charging station and cushions for comfort. Milburn Flooring oversaw the installation of the new flooring. In addition to his profound gift, Metzger also led a matching gift campaign for alumni of the program to have one of the lockers named in their honor. Each locker is named in honor of a Pride men’s lacrosse alumnus and Metzger matched each gift for all 48 lockers. Table of Contenets Quick Facts ....................................................................................2 Series Records .............................................................................47 HEADstrong ..................................................................................4 All-Time Hofstra Lacrosse Results .............................................48 Nick Colleluori Tribute
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Football Program
    2011 FOOTBALL PROGRAM 2010 Provincial Champions Table of Contents Principal’s Message ............................................................................................. 2 Head Coach’s Message ....................................................................................... 2 Vancouver College Staff & Schedules ................................................................. 3 Irish Coaches and Support Staff ......................................................................... 4 2011 Fighting Irish Graduating Seniors ................................................................ 6 Irish Alumni Currently in the Canadian Football League ...................................... 9 Vancouver College Fighting Irish - Varsity Statistical Leaders 2010 ................... 12 Vancouver College Fighting Irish - Football Awards ........................................... 13 Fighting Irish Who Played Professional Sports .................................................. 15 Fighting Irish Sports Hall of Fame Inductees ..................................................... 16 5400 Cartier Street, Vancouver BC V6M 3A5 Recent Irish Varsity Football Graduates – Where Are They Now? .................... 17 Irish Alumni Who Were CFL All Stars ................................................................ 17 Fighting Irish Who Were Canadian Football League Divisional All Stars ........... 18 Irish CFL Trophy Winners .................................................................................. 18 Irish Academics ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • S L Acrosse M Edia G Uide
    Adelphi Athletics - A Tradition of Success 2013 Men’s Lacrosse Northeast-10 Conference The Northeast-10 Conference is an NCAA Division respective NCAA Final Fours. Quick Facts II conference that was established in 1979. The conference consists of 16 member institutions located Also during the 2011-12 academic year, Southern University Information throughout the Northeast in the states of Connecticut, Connecticut’s Amanda Thomas won national cham- Location: Garden City, N.Y. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, and pionships in the 200 and 400 individual medleys, and Founded: 1896 Vermont. for her efforts was named the 2012 NCAA Division II Enrollment: Over 8,500 Women’s Swimmer of the Year. President: Dr. Robert A. Scott The institutions that make up the NE-10 include Athletic Director: Robert E. Hartwell Adelphi University, American International College, Southern Connecticut’s Nick Lebron (heptathlon) and Assoc. Athletic Director/SWA: Kate Whalen Assumption College, Bentley University, Franklin American International’s Dominic Smith (400 meter Conference: Northeast-10 Pierce University, Le Moyne College, University of dash) also claimed individual national titles at the Affiliation: NCAA Division II Massachusetts Lowell, Merrimack College, Univer- 2012 NCAA Indoor Track & Field Championships. Home Field: Motamed Field sity of New Haven, Pace University, Saint Anselm Nickname: Panthers College, Saint Michael’s College, The College of In all, 59 different Northeast-10 Conference teams School Colors: Brown and Gold Saint Rose, Southern Connecticut State University, were selected to participate in NCAA Champion- Athletic Department Phone: (516) 877-4240 Southern New Hampshire University, and Stonehill ship play during the 2011-12 academic year.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C-1 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment
    Appendix C-1 Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment August 20, 2018 File No. 21648 1237 7th Street Associates, LLC c/o Sandstone Properties, Inc. 10877 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1105 Los Angeles, California 90024 Attention: Michael Moore Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Proposed Mixed-Use Development 1330 West Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, California Ladies and Gentlemen: 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose and intent of this document is to evaluate the soil and geological site characteristics associated with the proposed development including potential environmental impacts to the surrounding area, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This report includes information from geotechnical investigations performed in near proximity to the site, engineering analysis, review of published geologic data, and review of available geotechnical engineering information. 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS The subject site is located at 1330 West Pico Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles, California. The site occupies a city block and is delimited by Pico Boulevard to the northeast, Highway 110 to the southeast, West 14th Street to the southwest and Albany Street to the northwest. An existing 2-story residential structure and a 4-story church are currently located at the corner of 14th Street and Albany Street and are not included within the subject site property lines. The site is shown relative to nearby topographic features in the enclosed Vicinity Map. As indicated in the enclosed Survey Plan, the site is currently developed with an existing office building. The existing structure occupies the vast majority of the site and ranges from two stories to three stories in height with rooftop parking.
    [Show full text]