Global Evs (Overweight) Tesla Reshaping the Industry Landscape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Evs (Overweight) Tesla Reshaping the Industry Landscape 2021 Outlook | November 24, 2020 Global EVs (Overweight) Tesla reshaping the industry landscape Yeon-ju Park [email protected] Chuljoong Kim [email protected] Minkyung Kim [email protected] Hyunwoo Jin [email protected] Jaekwang Rhee [email protected] Analysts who prepared this report are registered as research analysts in Korea but not in any other jurisdiction, including the US PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & DISCLAIMERS IN APPENDIX 1 AT THE END OF REPORT. Contents [Summary] A world shaped by Tesla 3 I. [2020 review] Tesla and the pandemic 4 II. [2021 outlook] 5 ① Tesla to tighten its grip on the market ② European OEMs to play catch-up ③ Inevitable changes for US OEMs ④ Battery innovation to accelerate ⑤ Opportunity in commercial EVs ⑥ Upside potential of US ESS market ⑦ Potential comeback of lithium ⑧ China transitioning to market competition III. [Medium-term outlook] Transition to gain pace 34 IV. [Investment strategy] Tesla reshaping the landscape 35 V. Global peer valuations 36 VI. [Company analysis] 37 Geely Automobile/LG Chem/Samsung SDI 2 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research [Summary] A world shaped by Tesla Adjusting up our medium-term electric vehicle (EV) penetration rate forecasts 33% Shift to EVs to accelerate Battery innovation driven by Tesla, increased policy support, OEMs’ commitment to EV transition, and more compelling models 29% 21% Penetration 18% 4% 2020F 2025F 2030F 3 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research I. [2020 review] Tesla and the pandemic Enhanced growth • In 2020, stocks of companies in the global EV supply chain have outperformed the broader market. potential • In particular, Tesla has outperformed on the back of robust earnings and a stronger growth outlook, supported by increased government subsidies since the COVID-19 outbreak. • Tesla has been setting new sales records and delivering earnings surprises. • Governments in Europe have expanded EV subsidies as part of their stimulus packages. • China, after pledging to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, announced an aggressive target for EV sales by 2035. • EV makers (e.g., Tesla) and Chinese battery suppliers have enjoyed share price rallies. Tesla: 12-month forward EPS consensus YTD share performances of global EV makers/battery suppliers ($) 2021 EPS consensus 2022 EPS consensus (%) 6 400 300 4 200 100 0 2 Tesla BYD CATL LG Chem Samsung SDI 1/20 3/20 5/20 7/20 9/20 11/20 Source: Bloomberg, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Source: Bloomberg, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 4 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research II. [2021 outlook] ① Tesla to tighten its grip on the market Tesla’s production • The start of China production is what has powered Tesla’s surprise performance in 2020. capacity in China to • Increased cost competitiveness and subsidies have enabled Tesla to cut the price of its Chinese-made Model 3, expand leading to volume growth and earnings improvement. • For the Model Y, production at Gigafactory Shanghai is expected to start in 2021; Tesla will likely offer competitive pricing to expand its market share (as it did with the Model 3). • Given that the Model Y and the Model 3 share 70% of their parts, expanded production should lead to a virtuous circle whereby scale effects lead to additional cost reductions, price cuts, and market share gains. • We forecast Tesla’s production capacity in China to expand more rapidly than the market is currently anticipating, reaching 250,000 units at end-2020 and double that level at end-2021. Tesla Model 3’s selling price in China Model 3 vs. Model Y (CNY'000) 500 Model 3 Model Y Standard Range Plus RWD Long Range AWD Purchase tax Subsidies for models made 400 in China Price cut Additional 300 Additional Segment Sedan SUV 250,000 488,000 Starting price (CNY) (including subsidies and 200 (likely to be lowered) tax benefits) Driving range (km, 430 505 WLTP) 100 0-60mph (s) 5.6 5.1 Battery capacity 54 75 (kWh) 0 Dimensions (mm) 4,694 x 1849 x 1443 4,751 x 1921 x 1624 2019.05 2019.08 2020.01 2020.04 2020.05 2020.09 Note: Including subsidies and tax benefits Source: Press reports, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Source: Press reports, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 5 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research II. [2021 outlook] ① Tesla to tighten its grip on the market Gigafactory Berlin to • Gigafactory Berlin is scheduled to come online in Jul. 2021 and produce the Model Y. come online in mid-2021 • Gigafactory Berlin should be more cost-competitive than the Fremont factory, in light of: 1) tariff exemption in the eurozone (vs. a 10% tariff on imported cars from the US); 2) transportation cost reductions; and 3) fixed-cost savings. • Tesla plans to use Gigafactory Berlin as a testbed for new technologies. • The Model 3 offers more compelling features than other premium models in the same class, aided by Tesla’s dedicated platform, scale effects, and superior battery management system (BMS) technology. • The upcoming start-up of Gigafactory Berlin will help Tesla sharpen its competitive edge in European markets. Tesla Model 3 (long-range) vs. European premium EVs Automaker Tesla Mercedes-Benz Audi Volvo BMW Porsche Model 3 Model EQC e-tron 50 Polestar 2 iX3 Taycan 4S Long Range AWD Segment Sedan SUV Midsize Midsize SUV Luxury sedan Starting price 52.4 71.3 62.7 57.9 68.0 108.9 (EUR‘000) Driving range 560 417 341 470 460 335–408 (km, WLTP) 0-60mph (s) 4.6 5.1 6.8 4.7 6.8 4.0 Battery capacity 75 80 71 78 80 79.2 (kWh) Dimensions (mm) 4,694 x 1,849 x 1,443 4,761 x 1,884 x 1,623 4,901 x 1,935 x 1,632 4,606 x 1,479 x 1,985 4,734 x 1,891 x 1,668 4,963 x 1,966 x 1,379 Jan. 2020 (Apr. in the Release Jul. 2018 Jul. 2019 Jan. 2020 Jun. 2020 End-2020 US) 6 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research II. [2021 outlook] ① Tesla to tighten its grip on the market Texas factory and • Tesla's Texas factory is scheduled to come online in mid-2021 and produce the Cybertruck and the Model Y. Cybertruck • Despite its high price tag, the Cybertruck should generate strong demand thanks to its compelling features and better fuel economy than conventional vehicle models (F-150 annual fuel cost: US$1,400-1,500). Cybertruck pre- orders have already exceeded 600,000. • With the Cybertruck, Tesla is poised to extend its grip beyond the sedan/SUV segments into the pickup segment. Tesla Cybertruck vs. comparable conventional vehicle models (F-150/F-250) Tesla Cybertruck Ford F-Series Model Dual Motor AWD Tri Motor AWD F-150 F-250 Starting price (US$) 49,900 69,900 28,745–71,160 34,035–84,130 Traction force (lbs) 10,000 14,000 6,000~12,000 12,600~ 0-60mph (s) < 4.5 < 2.9 6.2 7.2 Driving range (km) 480 800~ - - Release End-2021 End-2021 - - Source: Press reports, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 7 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research II. [2021 outlook] ① Tesla to tighten its grip on the market Battery production and • Tesla plans to produce 100GWh of its own battery cells by 2022. A pilot production line (annual capacity of 10GWh) costs at the Fremont factory will be completed by end-2020, and mass-production quality assessment is set for 1H21. • While it remains to be seen how pilot production will turn out, we think Tesla stands a good chance of achieving a bigger battery cell form factor. Indeed, larger-form-factor cells are already being developed by existing battery makers, and Tesla has competitive advantages such as superior BMS and automation technology, strong financing and execution abilities, and scale. • Tesla’s battery road map has prompted battery cell companies to accelerate their R&D efforts. We believe Tesla can better position itself for success through partnerships with existing battery makers. • We expect Tesla to accelerate battery cost reductions through in-house production and/or partnerships with existing battery makers. Tesla’s road map to cutting battery costs in half Panasonic working with Tesla on 4680 battery cell production Source: Tesla, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Source: Maeil Business Newspaper, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 8 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research II. [2021 outlook] ① Tesla to tighten its grip on the market Tesla’s software • Tesla’s competitive software sets it apart from conventional OEMs. competitiveness to • Tesla vehicles regularly receive over-the-air software updates that improve driving performance. increase • Autonomous driving features are popular with consumers, and Tesla has recently increased their prices. • Tesla’s latest full self-driving (FSD) beta represents a significant step toward complete autonomy. Looking to 2021, we expect Tesla to enhance its competitiveness on the back of accumulated data, chip upgrades, and the massive computing power of the Dojo computer. Software updates to increase Model S’s driving range Tesla’s FSD features and price (km) (US$) 700 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 600 7,000 6,000 5,000 500 4,000 2019 2/20 8/20 11/20 5/19 7/19 11/19 7/20 11/20 9 | [2021 Outlook] Global EVs Mirae Asset Daewoo Research II. [2021 outlook] ② European OEMs to play catch-up Tesla has no equal in the • Amid expanded government subsidies, EV sales in Europe have increased sharply. That said, sales have been premium segment concentrated in the mass-market segment (e.g., Renault ZOE and Hyundai Kona).
Recommended publications
  • A Work Project, Presented As Part of the Requirements for the Award of A
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Economics / Finance / Management from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics. TESLA INC. EQUITY RESEARCH A TECH COMPANY SELLING CARS MAXIME HOZE - 41397 A Project carried out on the Master in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Nuno Vasconcelos e Sá 04.01.2021 Abstract Tesla’s market capitalization of $669bn as of 2. Jan. 2021 is disconnected from reality and can in our view not be justified by fundamental analysis. The 52-week share price range of $70,10-$718,71 implies a story-driven valuation that has given Tesla’s share price the momentum to reach unprecedented heights. Independent of the current market valuation of Tesla we see the company with great potential for growth and innovation, as it expands its production facilities towards Europe and China and has promising developments in breakthrough battery technologies, which will permit it to keep its competitive advantages and establish itself as the continued market leader in the battery electric vehicle (BEV) market and an important player in the energy generation & storage market in the future. Having almost reached the milestone of 500.000 delivered vehicles in 2020 and with ambitious expansion projects underway, we estimate that Tesla could reach close to 2 million vehicle deliveries in 2025 and 3,7 million in 2035. We reach a price target for FY21 of $160,70 through the APV valuation method and weighing three possible outcome scenarios that are detailed in the report. Keywords (up to four) Equity Research – Automotive Sector – Electric Vehicle – Energy Sector This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209).
    [Show full text]
  • Makes & Models
    Makes & Models EV Buyers Guide Background image: Designed by senivpetro / Freepik Types of EV SUVs A Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) is a type of automobile that combines elements of road-going passenger cars with features from off-road vehicles, such as raised ground clearance and four-wheel drive. Those three ingredients: a high driving position, better performance in icy weather and plenty of space make SUVs particularly attractive to families. Practical / Small Family EVs The most popular car being bought today in the UK still tends to be the traditional family hatchback. A hatchback offers families (even those with dogs) just about everything they could need in a car by being spacious but not as big as SUVs, making them easier to manoeuvre and park. The original problems associated with electric cars (high prices, restricted performance at higher speeds and a limited driving range) have all been addressed, providing a very attractive solution for this market segment. Small/city EVs Electric power and small cars have always been a natural fi t. Their nippy acceleration is ideal in town, where shorter journeys mean that you don’t need to worry about recharging until you get home. Future Releases The electric car revolution has continued in earnest into the 2020s, with exciting new electric cars arriving every month. Prices are just about starting to come down to affordable levels, and range is going up making them more attractive to purchase over existing petrol/diesel counterparts. Here are a few exciting models that will be released over the next couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Study
    DriveOhio Team Patrick Smith, Interim Director Luke Stedke, Managing Director, Communications Julie Brogan, Project Manager Authors Katie Ott Zehnder, HNTB Sam Spofforth, Clean Fuels Ohio Scott Lowry, HNTB Andrew Conley, Clean Fuels Ohio Santos Ramos, HNTB Cover Photograph By Bruce Hull of the FRA-70-14.56 (Project 2G) ODOT roadway project in coordination with which the City of Columbus, through a competitive bid, hired GreenSpot to install a DCFC on Fulton Street immediately off I-70/I-71 and adjacent to the Columbus Downtown High School property between Fourth Street and Fifth Street. Funding support for the electric vehicle DCFC was provided by AEP Ohio and Paul G. Allen Family Foundation. Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Charging Location Recommendations................................................................................................................................................... 1 Cost Estimate ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Next Steps ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Audit of Tesla, Inc. Cody Mccain University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Honors Program Spring 4-30-2019 A Strategic Audit of Tesla, Inc. Cody McCain University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/honorstheses Part of the Accounting Commons, and the Agribusiness Commons McCain, Cody, "A Strategic Audit of Tesla, Inc." (2019). Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 132. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/honorstheses/132 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses, University of Nebraska-Lincoln by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A Strategic Audit of Tesla, Inc. An Undergraduate Honors Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of University Honors Program Requirements University of Nebraska – Lincoln by Cody McCain, BS Accounting and Agribusiness College of Business April 29, 2019 Faculty Mentors: Samuel Nelson, PhD, Center of Entrepreneurship 1 Abstract After Tesla completed its first every back to back profitable quarters at the end of 2018, sales started to decline in the first quarter of 2019 and many question if the company would every be profitable. Through a strategic audit of Tesla and the electric vehicle industry several key factors have been identified to help improve Tesla’s profitability. Analysis tools used to analyze the company and the industry include Porter’s Five Forces, SWOT Analysis, and PEST Analysis. At the conclusion of the audit there are three recommendations given to help improve Tesla’s strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • A U.S. Consumer's Guide to Electric Vehicle Charging
    CONSUMER GUIDE TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES JUNE 2021 11570437 WHY BUY AN ELECTRIC CAR? Electric vehicles (EVs) are fun to drive, safe, comfortable, and convenient to refuel. They also cost less to operate per mile and produce no tailpipe emissions. Today’s electric cars do everything a gas car can do—and more. Most are high-performing vehicles with silent, instant torque, superb handling, and the latest technology and safety features. Most can travel 200–250 miles on a charge; many can go farther. Most EV drivers prefer to charge at home for its convenience and savings. A growing national network of public charging sites enables more consumers—even those who can’t plug in at home—to consider purchasing an EV. Because EVs are powered by electricity instead of gasoline, they shift our energy reliance to domestic sources while also reducing emissions. Cutting vehicle emissions is especially critical in communities adjacent to heavily trafficked roadways. As local power generation grows cleaner, every electric car charged on that grid gets cleaner too—and the broader public health and climate benefits increase. Electrifying light-duty transport would reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions by 17% relative to 2018 levels. EV 101 This guide highlights the two types of electric vehicles that plug into the grid to recharge their batteries. They are battery-electric (or all-electric) vehicles and plug-in hybrids. All-electric vehicles are powered solely Plug-in hybrids pair an electric motor by an electric motor and battery. They and battery with an internal-combustion burn no gasoline or diesel fuel, so they engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Reality Check Tesla, Inc
    Reality Check Tesla, Inc. NASDAQ: TSLA January 7, 2020 Author Aaron Greenspan Disclosures PlainSite affiliates own TSLA put options. Legal Notices Copyright © 2019-2020 Think Computer Corporation. All Rights Reserved. PlainSite is a registered trademark of Think Computer Corporation. This report is not legal or investment advice. Trade at your own risk. About PlainSite® PlainSite is a legal research initiative jointly run by Think Computer Corporation, a for-profit computer software company, and Think Computer Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. The PlainSite website at https://www.plainsite.org hosts information regarding over twelve million court dockets, as well as millions of documents and government records from federal and state entities. Think Computer Foundation, which also sponsors activities for individuals with disabilities in the Cleveland area, is funded in part by donations from Think Computer Corporation. Visit the Tesla, Inc. PlainSite profile at https://www.plainsite.org/profiles/tesla-inc/. Read our other Reality Check reports at http://www.plainsite.org/realitycheck/. Contact For PlainSite Pro Investor paid early access to future reports, questions, or comments, contact us by e-mail at [email protected]. Executive Summary Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA), a manufacturer of electric vehicles and solar panels, is widely regarded as an American clean energy success story. Its market capitalization has exceeded $80 billion at its peak, and it operates factories in California, Nevada, New York and China. Yet recently released docu- TSLA Price Per Share ments obtained by PlainSite affiliate Think Com- $450.00 puter Foundation reveal that the entire company $400.00 is at this point built on a massive, multi-billion dollar $350.00 fraud orchestrated by its CEO, Elon Musk, who for $300.00 years has gone to extreme lengths to conceal his $250.00 unlawful acts from shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Worth to Invest in Tesla? Qinrou Li1, A
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 351 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) Is it worth to invest in Tesla? Qinrou Li1, a 1Monash University, Clayton Campus, Wellington Rd, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia [email protected] Keywords: Tesla, Current financial performance, Free cash flow, Discounted cash flow, DCF assumptions. Abstract. There are many well-known brands in today’s automotive industry, such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz. On the contrary, there are abundant unpopular brands as well. Among numerous car brands in the global market, Tesla attracted almost everyone’s attention in an extremely short period of time, notwithstanding the fact that it is a newly established company. This paper analyzes the financial status of Tesla and makes predictions about its future performance based on historical data to decide whether investing in Tesla is a reasonable idea. 1. Introduction This paper uses Tesla as an example to conduct a thorough analysis because it is a representative sample and top runner in the electric vehicle industry. Although many car companies have entered the green car market such as Toyota and Ford, Tesla is the only company who devotes all its effort to the environmentally-friendly car market. It is known to all that fossil fuels are non-renewable, and they will become exhausted in the foreseeable future. Nowadays, people tend to put more attention on environmental issue and choose to buy products with a “green” label. Thus, the future of the automobile industry is relying on consuming renewable energy, such as solar energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertically Integrated Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric Vehicles
    sustainability Review Vertically Integrated Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric Vehicles, and Charging Infrastructure: A Review of Three Milestone Projects from Theory of Constraints Perspective Michael Naor 1,* , Alex Coman 2 and Anat Wiznizer 1 1 School of Busines Administration, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel; [email protected] 2 School of Computer Science, Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv 61000, Israel; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This research utilizes case study methodology based on longitudinal interviews over a decade coupled with secondary data sources to juxtapose Tesla with two high-profile past mega- projects in the electric transportation industry, EV-1 and Better Place. The theory of constraints serves as a lens to identify production and market bottlenecks for the dissemination of electric vehicles. The valuable lessons learned from EV1 failure and Better Place bankruptcy paved the way for Tesla’s operations strategy to build gigafactories which bears a resemblance to Ford T mass production last century. Specifically, EV1 relied on external suppliers to develop batteries, while Better Place was dependent on a single manufacturer to build cars uniquely compatible with its charging infrastructure, whereas Tesla established a closed-loop, green, vertically integrated supply chain consisting of batteries, electric cars and charging infrastructure to meet its customers evolving needs. The analysis unveils several limitations of the Tesla business model which can impede its Citation: Naor, M.; Coman, A.; Wiznizer, A. Vertically Integrated worldwide expansion, such as utility grid overload and a shortage of raw material, which Tesla Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric strives to address by innovating advanced batteries and further extending its vertically integrated Vehicles, and Charging Infrastructure: supply chain to the mining industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Per Hour of Charge
    THE COST TO CHARGE AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE POWERED BY Older model cars may not be on this list. Please refer to our EVSE Selector tool at www.clippercreek.com/charging-station-selector-tool/ COST PER HOUR OF CHARGE - RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICAL RATES Acceptance Cost Per Hour of Charge Miles per Hour Acceptance Cost Per Hour of Charge Miles per Hour Vehicle Rate (kW) $0.1269** per kWh of Charge* Vehicle Rate (kW) $0.1269** per kWh of Charge* Audi A3 E-Tron Nissan LEAF Cadillac ELR Nissan LEAF Plus 6.6 $0.84 26 Chevy Volt Toyota RAV4 Prime XSE Premium Fisker Karma Ford C Max Energi BMW ActiveE Ford Escape 2020 Jaguar I-Pace 7 $0.89 27 Ford Fusion Energi Range Rover P400e Hyundai Ioniq Plug-In Hybrid Hyundai Sonata Chevy Bolt Kia Niro Chevy Volt LT Upgrade and Premier Kia Optima Hyundai Ioniq 2020 Mercedes C350 Hybrid 3.3 $0.42 13 Hyundai Kona Mercedes GLE 550e Jeep Wrangler 4xe Mercedes S550 Hybrid Kia Niro 7.2 $0.91 28 MINI Cooper S E Countryman ALL4 Kia Soul Mitsubishi Outlander Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid Upg Nissan LEAF Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid Upg Smart Car Porsche Panamera 4 E-Hybrid Upg Subaru Crosstrek 2017 Smart ForTwo Toyota Prius EV VW e-Golf Toyota Prius Prime EV Toyota RAV4 Prime SE, XSE BMW i3 7.4 $0.94 29 Volvo V60 Mercedes GLC 350e 2020 7.4 $0.94 13 Volvo XC90T8 MINI Cooper SE 7.4 $0.94 13 Volvo XC40 Recharge 7.4 $0.94 29 BMW 330e BMW 530e Audi Q5 Plug-In Hybrid 7.7 $0.98 11 BMW 740e Tesla Model 3 Standard 7.7 $0.98 25 BMW 745e BMW i8 Audi e-tron SUV BMW X3 xDrive30e Mercedes B Class B250e Porsche Taycan BMW X5 xDrive40e 9.6 $1.22
    [Show full text]
  • Great Founder Theory
    Great Founder Theory Samo Burja 2020 Manuscript www.SamoBurja.com/GFT © Samo Burja, 2020. All Rights Reserved. Great Founder Theory Samo Burja 2020 Manuscript Contents Preface ............................................................................................5 Introduction ....................................................................................8 On Building Theories of History ...................................................16 Social Technology .........................................................................21 How Social Engineering Drives Technology ..................................31 Honors Fuel Achievement .............................................................40 How Elon Musk is Making Engineers Cool Again .........................47 On the Loss and Preservation of Knowledge .................................50 Intellectual Dark Matter................................................................59 Live vs. Dead Players .....................................................................68 Borrowed vs. Owned Power ..........................................................72 The Succession Problem ................................................................77 How Roman Emperors Handled the Succession Problem ..............82 What Botswana Can Teach Us About Political Stability ................89 Functional Institutions Are the Exception .....................................97 How to Use Bureaucracies ...........................................................103 Competition for Power ...............................................................111
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla's Cybertruck Is Audaciously Austenitic
    AE Marubeni Ad 0620.qxp 6/3/20 1:26 PM Page 1 Citizen Productivity, Miyano Precision Supported by MCC’s local, full service distributor network. Experience the difference. BNA-42MSY2 CNC Super Turning Center with 2 Spindles and 1 Turret with Y-Axis Enhanced front and back simultaneous machining capability. Not your basic single turret, twin spindle machine The X2 axis sub-spindle and superimposed synchronization enables simultaneous, independent machining of the front and back of the workpiece. This, in effect, provides the benefi ts of a twin turret machine with the signifi cant cost savings of a single turret model. • Increased power on spindle motors Machine specifi cations • High torque revolving tool motor provides heavier cutting Max. machining diameter 1 5/8" • Fast processing and short cycle time with the high speed NC unit Standard machining length 3.9" • Cincom Control ensures reduced idle time and easy setup Main spindle speed 60 ~ 6,000 • Compact design for fl oor space effi ciency Rotary tool spindle speed 60 ~ 6,000 Back spindle speed 50 ~ 5,000 www.marucit.com Allendale, NJ Elk Grove Village, IL Fountain Valley, CA Agawam, MA (201) 818-0100 (847) 364-9060 (714) 434-6224 (413) 786-6655 Free Info at http://info.hotims.com/76516-712 AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING® LIGHTWEIGHT METALS SPECIAL Megacasting muscle! Tesla Model Y goes big on aluminum castings with help from Italy’s Last Chance to Enter! IDRA Group Change the world, achieve global recognition, and win $20,000. Entry Deadline: July 1, 2020 CreateTheFutureContest.com Sergey Nivens/Shutterstock.com CTF Belly Band Lightbulb.indd 1 5/13/20 4:04 PM ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: Stainless steel for Cybertruck Tata Steel innovations Mixed-materials design tools June 2020 autoengineering.sae.org Last Chance to Enter! Change the world, achieve global recognition, and win $20,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Tesla Impact Report
    Impact Report 2020 1 Introduction The very purpose of Tesla’s existence is to accelerate the world’s transition Focusing on What Matters to sustainable energy. The objective of an Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) impact affordability and accessibility of our products. All these themes will be report is to disclose the impact a company has on those three areas, as covered in this year’s Impact Report. well as to present, to the extent possible, data and other information qualifying and quantifying that impact. Tesla aspires to do the right thing, and we are constantly looking for ways to do better. If you have suggestions about how our company can improve At Tesla, we strive to be the best on every metric relevant to our mission to in any way, feel free to send your ideas to [email protected]. accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy. In order to maximize our impact, we plan to continue increasing our production Finally, it is important to note that current ESG evaluation methodologies volumes and the accessibility of our products. In more concrete terms, this tend to use a generic template to analyze every manufacturing company’s means that by 2030 we are aiming to sell 20 million electric vehicles per carbon footprint. Vehicle use phase, which realistically accounts for 80- year (compared to 0.5 million in 2020) as well as to deploy 1,500 GWh of 90% of total automotive emissions (included in Scope 3 of ESG reporting) energy storage per year (compared to 3 GWh in 2020).
    [Show full text]