DOCSLIB.ORG

Mediation and Dialogue in the South Caucasus a Reflection on 15 Years of Conflict Transformation Initiatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MEDIATION AND DIALOGUE IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS A reflection on 15 years of conflict transformation initiatives Understanding conflict. Building peace. About International Alert International Alert is a 26-year old independent peacebuilding organisation. We work with people who are directly affected by violent conflict to improve their prospects of peace. And we seek to influence the policies and ways of working of governments, international organisations like the UN and multinational companies, to reduce conflict risk and increase the prospects of peace. We work in Africa, several parts of Asia, the South Caucasus, the Middle East and Latin America and have recently started work in the UK. Our policy work focuses on several key themes that influence prospects for peace and security – the economy, climate change, gender, the role of international institutions, the impact of development aid, and the effect of good and bad governance. We are one of the world’s leading peacebuilding NGOs with more than 148 staff based in London and 14 field offices. To learn more about how and where we work, visit www.international-alert.org. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of International Alert and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. © International Alert 2012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Layout by D. R. ink, www.d-r-ink.com Mediation and Dialogue in the South Caucasus: A Reflection on 15 Years of Conflict Transformation Initiatives 2 | Mediation and Dialogue in the South Caucasus Contents Acronyms 5 About the Contributors 6 Preface 13 Introduction 14 Glossary 21 PART 1: Official and Civil Mediation 23 CHAPTER 1 24 Mediation and Dialogue: Official and Unofficial Strategies Natalia Mirimanova CHAPTER 2 50 Opportunities and Limitations for Civil Society in the Conflict Transformation Process Case Study of the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Liana Kvarchelia PART 2: Politics and Mediation 61 CHAPTER 3 62 The Schlaining Process Jonathan Cohen CHAPTER 4 99 The Schlaining Process: An Abkhaz Perspective Manana Gurgulia CHAPTER 5 108 The Schlaining Process: A Georgian Perspective Paata Zakareishvili PART 3: Permanent Conference as Mediation 119 CHAPTER 6 120 Building and Sustaining a Permanent Conference Paula Garb Contents | 3 CHAPTER 7 130 The University of California (Irvine) Georgian-Abkhaz Civil Dialogue Process: A Georgian Perspective Nodar Sarjveladze CHAPTER 8 136 The University of California (Irvine) Georgian-Abkhaz Civil Dialogue Process: An Abkhaz Perspective Arda Inal-Ipa PART 4: Civil Society Development and Mediation 147 CHAPTER 9 148 The Experience of the Caucasus Forum: An Experiment in Holistic Peacebuilding Gevorg Ter-Gabrielyan CHAPTER 10 195 The Phenomenon of the Caucasus Forum Zhanna Krikorova CHAPTER 11 210 Remembering the Forgotten Alan Parastaev PART 5: Economy and Mediation 222 CHAPTER 12 223 Economy and Conflict in the South Caucasus The Caucasus Business and Development Network Diana Klein and Oskari Pentikainen CHAPTER 13 264 Economy and Conflict in the South Caucasus: Mediation – from Theory to Practice Aghavni Karakhanyan PART 6: Media and Mediation 286 CHAPTER 14 287 Media and Mediation in the Caucasus: Some Reflections Thomas de Waal 4 | Mediation and Dialogue in the South Caucasus CHAPTER 15 295 Mediation: From the Word ‘Media’? Karine Ohanyan CHAPTER 16 308 The Institute for War and Peace Reporting: Media and Peacebuilding Shahin Rzayev PART 7: Gender and Mediation 318 CHAPTER 17 319 The Peacebuilding Experience of the Caucasus Women’s League Natella Akaba CHAPTER 18 329 The Caucasus Women’s League: Five Years On Marina Pagava PART 8: Cultural and Academic Mediation 344 CHAPTER 19 345 Georgia-Abkhazia: Historiography and Conflict Experience of Teaching History as a Form of Mediation George Anchabadze CHAPTER 20 361 Dialogue through Culture – or Cultural Dialogue Batal Kobakhia CHAPTER 21 383 Understanding and Defending what it Means to be Human Guram Odisharia Acronyms | 5 Acronyms AGT Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey pipeline ASPR Austrian Study Center for Peace and Conflict Resolution ASU Abkhaz State University BTC Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline CBDN Caucasus Business and Development Network CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CR Conciliation Resources CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (precursor to OSCE) CSDP Common Security and Defence Policy CSO Civil Society Organisation CSTO Collective Security Treaty Organization EaP European Union Eastern Partnership EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC European Commission ECRG South Caucasus Economy and Conflict Research Group ENP European Union Neighbourhood Policy EUMM European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia GIPA Georgian Institute of Public Affairs IDP Internally Displaced Person IMTD Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy INGO International Non-Governmental Organisation IWPR Institute for War and Peace Reporting JCC Joint Control Commission for Georgian–Ossetian Conflict Resolution JPK Joint Peacekeeping Forces KCR Karachay-Cherkessia Republic KGB Committee for State Security MID Ministry of Internal Affairs MLA Members of the Legislative Assembly (Northern Ireland) MP Member of Parliament NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NGO Non-Governmental Organisation OSCE Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe RBC Regional Business Centre SME Small and Medium-sized Enterprise TABDC Turkish-Armenian Business Development Council TACIS European Union Technical Assistance to the Commonwealth of Independent States UCI University of California Irvine UNDPA United Nations Department of Political Affairs UNDPKO United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations UNHCR United Nations Refugee Agency (UN High Commissioner for Refugees) UNIFEM United Nations Development Fund for Women UNOMIG United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia UNSC United Nations Security Council UNSRSG United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General UNV United Nations Volunteer 6 | Mediation and Dialogue in the South Caucasus About the Contributors Natalia Mirimanova is a conflict resolution scholar-practitioner and has extensive work experience throughout Russia, the South Caucasus and Central Asia, in Moldova, Ukraine, the Balkans and Eastern Europe. Since 1993, she has designed and implemented conflict analysis and resolution programmes and trainings for universities, business and civil society sectors, as well as non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and community groups. Natalia has carried out interdisciplinary research projects under the aegis of the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), Internews, International Alert, Conciliation Resources, the Aga Khan Foundation and the National Democratic Institute, among others. She is also a co-author of several books – From War Economy to Peace Economy in the South Caucasus (International Alert, 2004), Corruption and Conflict in the South Caucasus (International Alert, 2006) and others – as well as articles and training manuals on conflict transformation, democracy building in transitional societies and mass media. Natalia received her PhD from the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, US. Liana Kvarchelia is Deputy Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Programmes (CHP), one of the longest-standing NGOs in Abkhazia, established in 1994. Working on a range of civil society development issues, she is regularly involved as a researcher facilitator, trainer and moderator in various projects related to democratisation processes in Abkhazia, and to conflict transformation and civic education both in Abkhazia and in the wider Caucasus framework. Since 1996, she has been actively involved in a number of projects concerning the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict, including participation in long-term programmes together with the University of California (Irvine), Conciliation Resources and International Alert. From 1997 to 2000, she worked as National Community Facilitator in the United Nations Volunteers (UNV) programme in Abkhazia. She spent the academic year 2000–2001 as an International Fellow at the independent peacebuilding organisation Responding to Conflict in the UK. Liana has also served as one of the leaders of the “League of Voters for Fair Elections”, which has monitored elections in Abkhazia since 2004. Jonathan Cohen joined Conciliation Resources in 1997 and developed the Caucasus programme focusing on dialogue and peacebuilding initiatives. In September 2008, he became Director of Programmes overseeing Conciliation Resources’ regional programmes in East and West Africa, the Caucasus, India/Pakistan (Kashmir), the Philippines, Fiji and Colombia. Previously, Jonathan was Deputy Director of the Foundation on Inter-Ethnic Relations in The Hague, working with the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. Before that, he worked for International Alert and the Peace Research Institute Oslo. He has been a board member of the Department for International Development/Charities Aid Foundation (DFID/CAF) Partnerships in the Non-Profit Sector Programme for Russia, acted as a consultant to United Nations About the Contributors | 7 Volunteers, the Heinrich Böll Foundation and the Berghof Foundation for Conflict
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Mediterranean, Issue No 78

    Sustainable Mediterranean, Issue No 78

    ISSUE 78 Sustainable Mediterranean MEDITERRANEE DURABLE I BIΩΣIMH MEΣOΓEIOΣ I MEDITERRANEO SOSTENIBLE I Climate Change: The rapidly increasing challenge for the Mediterranean 1 SUSTAINABLE MEDITERRANEAN | ISSUE 78 Guest Editor’s Corner As dawn rose over snow-covered Kyoto, (Japan) degree of risk of overstepping the 1.5°C limit – a 2100 – with the ‘collapse of civilisation as we actions - casting a shadow of doubt on prospects sleep-deprived delegates, observers and my fel- level which would limit the risk of giving certain know it’ foreseen some time before that. for a successful COP 26 outcome. low journalists cheered and clapped as the fi- Earth tipping points an additional push. Needed nal all-night session of the UN Framework Con- emission cuts will not only require a decarboni- The UK-hosted ‘live’ COP 26 in Glasgow this No- If urgent comprehensive global action is essen- vention on Climate Change’s COP3 (December sation revolution - by phasing out fossil energy vember (with doubts persisting whether the UK tial, so by definition are its components - region- 1997) adopted the text of the Kyoto Protocol. The – but at the same time maximising efficiency and health situation and/or vaccination shortfalls in al and national action. world’s then leading emitter, the USA (now over- sufficiency, achieving climate-friendly behaviours developing countries will force postponement) is taken by China), refused to ratify. However it came and diets as well as nature-friendly carbon re- billed as ‘the last chance’ to keep the 1.5°C pos- So thank you, Prof. Scoullos, for this timely pub- into force in 2005 mandating modest greenhouse moval through afforestation and land use change sibility open – if total emission reduction com- lication to mobilise Mediterranean citizens and gas emission cuts by 37 industrialised nations while assuring the safe operation of Earth sys- mitments on the table there suffice to deliver the governments and for honouring me with the priv- between 2008 and 2012, subsequently extended tems.
  • North America Other Continents

    North America Other Continents

    Arctic Ocean Europe North Asia America Atlantic Ocean Pacific Ocean Africa Pacific Ocean South Indian America Ocean Oceania Southern Ocean Antarctica LAND & WATER • The surface of the Earth is covered by approximately 71% water and 29% land. • It contains 7 continents and 5 oceans. Land Water EARTH’S HEMISPHERES • The planet Earth can be divided into four different sections or hemispheres. The Equator is an imaginary horizontal line (latitude) that divides the earth into the Northern and Southern hemispheres, while the Prime Meridian is the imaginary vertical line (longitude) that divides the earth into the Eastern and Western hemispheres. • North America, Earth’s 3rd largest continent, includes 23 countries. It contains Bermuda, Canada, Mexico, the United States of America, all Caribbean and Central America countries, as well as Greenland, which is the world’s largest island. North West East LOCATION South • The continent of North America is located in both the Northern and Western hemispheres. It is surrounded by the Arctic Ocean in the north, by the Atlantic Ocean in the east, and by the Pacific Ocean in the west. • It measures 24,256,000 sq. km and takes up a little more than 16% of the land on Earth. North America 16% Other Continents 84% • North America has an approximate population of almost 529 million people, which is about 8% of the World’s total population. 92% 8% North America Other Continents • The Atlantic Ocean is the second largest of Earth’s Oceans. It covers about 15% of the Earth’s total surface area and approximately 21% of its water surface area.

  • From Operation Serval to Barkhane

    same year, Hollande sent French troops to From Operation Serval the Central African Republic (CAR) to curb ethno-religious warfare. During a visit to to Barkhane three African nations in the summer of 2014, the French president announced Understanding France’s Operation Barkhane, a reorganization of Increased Involvement in troops in the region into a counter-terrorism Africa in the Context of force of 3,000 soldiers. In light of this, what is one to make Françafrique and Post- of Hollande’s promise to break with colonialism tradition concerning France’s African policy? To what extent has he actively Carmen Cuesta Roca pursued the fulfillment of this promise, and does continued French involvement in Africa constitute success or failure in this rançois Hollande did not enter office regard? France has a complex relationship amid expectations that he would with Africa, and these ties cannot be easily become a foreign policy president. F cut. This paper does not seek to provide a His 2012 presidential campaign carefully critique of President Hollande’s policy focused on domestic issues. Much like toward France’s former African colonies. Nicolas Sarkozy and many of his Rather, it uses the current president’s predecessors, Hollande had declared, “I will decisions and behavior to explain why break away from Françafrique by proposing a France will not be able to distance itself relationship based on equality, trust, and 1 from its former colonies anytime soon. solidarity.” After his election on May 6, It is first necessary to outline a brief 2012, Hollande took steps to fulfill this history of France’s involvement in Africa, promise.
  • Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis

    Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis

    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 4 Spring 2005 Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Hannibal Travis, Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq, 3 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 1 (2005). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2005 Northwestern University School of Law Volume 3 (Spring 2005) Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights FREEDOM OR THEOCRACY?: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ By Hannibal Travis* “Afghans are victims of the games superpowers once played: their war was once our war, and collectively we bear responsibility.”1 “In the approved version of the [Afghan] constitution, Article 3 was amended to read, ‘In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.’ … This very significant clause basically gives the official and nonofficial religious leaders in Afghanistan sway over every action that they might deem contrary to their beliefs, which by extension and within the Afghan cultural context, could be regarded as
  • UNIVERSITY of TARTU Faculty of Social Sciences Johan

    UNIVERSITY of TARTU Faculty of Social Sciences Johan

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at Tartu University Library UNIVERSITY OF TARTU Faculty of Social Sciences Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies Master’s Thesis Lika Merebashvili DISCOVERING CONNECTIONS BETWEEN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL DEPENDENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF RUSSIA - GEORGIA ECONOMIC RELATIONS Supervisor: Prof. Viacheslav Morozov Tartu 2016 I have written this Master's thesis independently. All viewpoints of other authors, literary sources and data from elsewhere used for writing this paper have been referenced. Lika Merebashvili The defence will take place on 19.12.16 at Lossi 36, Tartu, Estonia. Opponent - Dr. Leonardo Alvarez Pataccini Acknowledgements I would like to thank Prof. Viacheslav Morozov for supervising my thesis and for providing his valuable recommendations and constructive criticism which strongly encouraged me to do my best in the preparation of this work. I would like to also express my deep gratitude to the reviewer of the thesis Dr. Pataccini and the entire pre-defence committee, especially to Thomas Linsenmaier, Stefano Braghiroli, Heiko Pääbo, Raul Toomla, and Olga Bogdanova for their relevant comments and advice. And, finally, I would like to thank Oliivia Võrk and Aigi Hommik for their continuous administrative support. ABSTRACT This Master’s thesis examines social dimension of the economic dependence and foreign policy compliance of Georgia to Russia in order to explain foreign policy choices of the governments of Georgia. According to the mainstream IPE scholarship, higher the economic dependence, more prone the dependent partner is to make political compromises for the benefit of the dominant.
  • Eco-Innovation in Cyprus

    Eco-Innovation in Cyprus

    Eco-innovation in Cyprus EIO Country Profile 2018-2019 Eco-Innovation Observatory The Eco-Innovation Observatory functions as a platform for the structured collection and analysis of an extensive range of eco-innovation and circular economy information, gathered from across the European Union and key economic regions around the globe, providing a much-needed integrated information source on eco-innovation for companies and innovation service providers, as well as providing a solid decision-making basis for policy development. The Observatory approaches eco-innovation as a persuasive phenomenon present in all economic sectors and therefore relevant for all types of innovation, defining eco-innovation as: “Eco-innovation is any innovation that reduces the use of natural resources and decreases the release of harmful substances across the whole life-cycle”. To find out more, visit www.eco-innovation.eu and ec.europa.eu/environment/ecoap Any views or opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Commission. 1 Eco-Innovation Observatory Country Profile 2018-2019: Cyprus Author: Andreas Mitsios (Deloitte Développement Durable) Coordinator of the work package: Technopolis Group Belgium 1 Acknowledgments This document was prepared with significant support from: • Elina Lugbull (Deloitte Sustainability); • Fabio Matagnino (The Cyprus Institute), Anthi Charalambous (OEB). A note to Readers Any views or opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Union. A number of companies are presented as illustrative examples of eco-innovation in this report. The EIO does not endorse these companies and is not an exhaustive source of information on innovation at the company level.
  • Foreign Observation of the Illegitimate Elections in South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2019

    Foreign Observation of the Illegitimate Elections in South Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2019

    FOREIGN OBSERVATION OF THE ILLEGITIMATE ELECTIONS IN SOUTH OSSETIA AND ABKHAZIA IN 2019 Anton Shekhovtsov FOREIGN OBSERVATION OF THE ILLEGITIMATE ELECTIONS IN SOUTH OSSETIA AND ABKHAZIA IN 2019 Anton Shekhovtsov Contents Executive summary _____________________________________ 4 Introduction: Illegitimacy of the South Ossetian “parliamentary” and Abkhaz “presidential elections” ___________ 6 “Foreign observers” of the 2019 “elections” in South Ossetia and Abkhazia ____________________________ 9 Established involvement of “foreign observers” in pro-Kremlin efforts __________________________________ 16 Assessments of the South Ossetian and Abkhaz 2019 “elections” by “foreign observers” _____________________ 21 Conclusion ___________________________________________ 27 Edition: European Platform for Democratic Elections www.epde.org Responsible for the content: Europäischer Austausch gGmbH Erkelenzdamm 59 10999 Berlin, Germany Represented through: Stefanie Schiffer EPDE is financially supported by the European Union and the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. The here expressed opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the donors. Executive summary The so-called “Republic of South Ossetia” and “Republic of Abkhazia” are breakaway regions of Georgia that are recognised as independent sovereign states only by five UN Member States: Russia (which supports their de facto independence by military, economic and political means), Nauru, Nicaragua, Syria and Venezuela. Other entities that recognise South Ossetia and Abkhaz- ia as independent
  • Muslim Communities of Georgia

    Muslim Communities of Georgia

    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA Muslim Communities of Georgia: External Influences and Domestic Challenges A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE SCHOOL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ARTS BY AMALYA FLJYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA MAY 2015 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….....4 Islam in Georgia: Background .…………………………………………………..……..6 Chapter 1: Literature Review…………………………………………………………………..8 Research Methodology………………………………………………………………………..14 Chapter 2: External Influences and Muslim Communities of Georgia.……………………....15 2.1 Turkey…………………………………………………………………………......15 2.2 Azerbaijan…………………………………………………………………………28 2.3 Iran………………………………………………………………………………...40 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………...…….45 Bibliography……………………………………………....…………………………………...47 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to people who supported me throughout the whole process of work on my Master’s Essay. First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Vahram Ter-Matevosyan. This work would not be possible without his constant support, patience, energy and dedication. The guidance and encouragement provided throughout the whole period of work on my research contributed to the overall development of my work. I was very fortunate to work with you. Further, I would like to thank the American University of Armenia and the Department of Political Science and International Affairs for creating perfect environment for academic studies. I would like specially thank Dr. Yevgenya Paturyan for her help, support and guidance during the course on Research Design. Your advice was very valuable during the first period of work on our Master’s essays. I would like to thank the Program Chair of the Department of Political Science and International for his work as program chair and support in academic endeavors.
  • Conciliation Resources Front Cover: People Displaced from Gali Region in Abkhazia

    Conciliation Resources Front Cover: People Displaced from Gali Region in Abkhazia

    Out of the margins Securing a voice for internally displaced people: lessons from Georgia 2009 conciliation resources Front cover: People displaced from Gali region in Abkhazia. They have lived for the past 16 years in this unfinished building used as a collective centre in the neighbouring Zugdidi region. They can see the fields of Gali from there. All photographs were taken by Dato Meskhi, except where indicated. Contents Summary 4 1 Introduction 6 1.1 Internal displacement: pasts, futures and the present 6 2 Internal displacement in Georgia 10 2.1 Numbers and waves of displacement 10 2.2 Separateness and alienation 11 2.3 Return to the Gali district 13 2.4 Political context for the project 13 3 Displaced communities and political inclusion in Georgia 15 3.1 Inclusion as a separate community with dedicated institutions 15 3.2 Inclusion as individuals in the mainstream of Georgian politics 16 4 Aims and progress of the project 18 4.1 Brief description of the project 18 4.2 Working as a network 18 4.3 Working with displaced people 20 4.4 Working with government 20 4.5 The advocacy group 21 5 Specific issues 24 5.1 Integration 24 5.2 Interaction with mainstream party politics 26 5.3 Working on conflict 29 6 The August war 32 6.1 Emotional impact of the war and responses 33 7 Conclusions 36 Acknowledgements 38 Summary Over 200,000 ethnic Georgians remain displaced from • entrenched corruption within the government- their homes since the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict in the early in-exile 1990s.
  • Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics Study and Research on Election

    Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics Study and Research on Election

    Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics Study and Research on Election Media Coverage for 2016 Parliamentary Elections in Georgia TV News Monitoring Report 26 September – 2 November, 2016 The Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics is implementing the monitoring of TV news broadcasts within the framework of the project entitled “Study of the Media Coverage of the 2016 Parliamentary Elections” funded by the European Union (EU) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The monitoring is carried out from 20 May to 19 December, 2016 and covers main news programs on the following 11 TV channels: “1st Channel” of the public broadcaster, “Rustavi 2”, “Maestro”, “GDS”, “Tabula”, “Kavkasia”, “TV Pirveli”, “Obieqtivi”, “Ajara TV”, and “TV 25”. This report presents the media monitoring results for the period of 26 September through 2 November, 2016. The quantitative and the qualitative analysis of the monitoring data has revealed the following key findings: At the outset of the monitoring a large number of TV channels devoted their primary attention to the activities of the Government of Georgia. During the last two monitoring rounds, however, this trend has been altered and TV channels started to actively cover political groups. During this round of monitoring “United National Movement” received the highest coverage among all political subjects at the nine monitored TV channels; As during the previous round of monitoring, activities of the Government of Georgia were most positively covered by “GDS” with 11% of positive tone indicators.
  • Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia

    Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia

    PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova August 2012 Figueroa Press Los Angeles The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and cannot be interpreted to reflect the positions of organizations that the author is affiliated with. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-214016-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-214016-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
  • The View from Abkhazia of South Ossetia Ablaze

    The View from Abkhazia of South Ossetia Ablaze

    Central Asian Survey Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2009, 235–246 The view from Abkhazia of South Ossetia ablaze Paula Garbà Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine, USA The Abkhazian and South Ossetian perspectives on the fighting between Georgians and South Ossetians in August 2008 could not be heard above the noise generated around the geopolitical implications of the larger Russian–Georgian clash. The population of Abkhazia experienced the violence in South Ossetia as though it was occurring on their own territory. This confirmed their complete lack of trust in the Georgian government’s commitment to peaceful resolution of the conflicts. In addition, they were disappointed with what they regarded as the international community’s absence of criticism of Georgia’s actions and lack of concern for the safety and well-being of the South Ossetians. Russia’s recognition of South Ossetia’s and Abkhazia’s independence has taken the question of Georgia’s territorial integrity off the negotiation table indefinitely. It also has set back the formal peace process with both South Ossetia and Abkhazia. An essential way forward, toward establishing trust as a necessary foundation for progress in the political negotiations, would be for the US and other interested countries to engage with the people of Abkhazia and South Ossetia at all levels, demonstrating credible and consistent concern for the safety and well being of all the people affected by the conflict. Keywords: conflict; culture; Abkhazia; South Ossetia Introduction Georgian–Abkhazian official relations since the end of the 1992–1993 war have offered little common ground for a mutually acceptable resolution.