Arxiv:1712.01760V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 26 Jan 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arxiv:1712.01760V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 26 Jan 2018 Instant Preheating in Quintessential Inflation with α−Attractors Konstantinos Dimopoulos,1 Leonora Donaldson Wood,1 and Charlotte Owen1 1Consortium for Fundamental Physics, Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom (Dated: January 29, 2018) We investigate a compelling model of quintessential inflation in the context of α-attractors, which naturally result in a scalar potential featuring two flat regions; the inflationary plateau and the quintessential tail. The \asymptotic freedom" of α-attractors, near the kinetic poles, suppresses radiative corrections and interactions, which would otherwise threaten to lift the flatness of the quintessential tail and cause a 5th-force problem respectively. Since this is a non-oscillatory inflation model, we reheat the Universe through instant preheating. The parameter space is constrained by both inflation and dark energy requirements. We find an excellent correlation between the inflationary observables and model predictions, in agreement with the α-attractors set-up. We also obtain successful quintessence for natural values of the parameters. Our model predicts potentially sizeable tensor perturbations (at the level of 1%) and a slightly varying equation of state for dark energy, to be probed in the near future. INTRODUCTION expansion, is called quintessential inflation [6]. Quintessen- tial inflation is economical in that it models both inflation One of the greatest discoveries in cosmology was that and quintessence in a common theoretical framework and the Universe is currently undergoing accelerated expansion employs a single degree of freedom. It also features some [1,2]. To account for this, Einstein's General Relativity de- practical advantages, for example the initial conditions of mands that the dominant component of the Universe con- quintessence are determined by the inflationary attractor. tent violates the strong energy condition. Assuming that it As such the infamous coincidence problem (which corre- is a barotropic fluid, its pressure must be negative enough sponds to late inflation occurring at present) is reduced to 1 a constraint on the model parameters and not on initial p < 3 ρ. Such a mysterious substance is dubbed `dark en- ergy'.− conditions. By far, the simplest choice of dark energy is vacuum den- Quintessential inflation models require the inflaton po- sity, due to a non-zero cosmological constant, for which tential energy density to survive until the present day to p = ρ. The main problem with this idea is that the re- act as dark energy. Amongst other things, this necessitates quired− value of the cosmological constant is staggeringly a reheating mechanism alternative to the standard assump- small such that the vacuum density is about 10120 times tion, in which, after the end of inflation, the inflaton field smaller than the Planck density, which corresponds to the decays into the thermal bath of the hot big bang. If in- cutoff scale of the theory. This has been called \the worst flaton decay is not considered, then reheating must occur fine-tuning in Physics".1 To overcome this, but at the ex- by other means. Different reheating alternatives to inflaton pense of introducing new Physics, there have been alterna- decay include instant preheating [7,8], curvaton reheating tive proposals put forward. [9{11] and gravitational reheating [12, 13], amongst oth- A substance which can exhibit pressure negative enough ers [14], which may or may not happen exclusively. For is a potentially dominated homogeneous scalar field. Thus, example, gravitational reheating is always present, but be- it is possible for a dynamical scalar field to drive the ac- cause it is a very inefficient mechanism it is overwhelmed celerated expansion of the Universe, therefore being a type if another reheating mechanism is present. The outcome of of dark energy. The idea has long been in use when mod- any of these reheating mechanisms must complete and lead elling cosmic inflation in the early Universe (inflationary to radiation domination well before the time of Big Bang paradigm). Mirroring the mechanism used to explain in- Nucleosynthesis (BBN). The temperature of the Universe arXiv:1712.01760v3 [astro-ph.CO] 26 Jan 2018 flation, this idea can also be applied to address the cur- when radiation domination takes over is called the reheat- rent accelerated expansion. A scalar field responsible for ing temperature Treh. Thus we need Treh 1 MeV to avoid late inflation is called quintessence; the fifth element after disturbing BBN. baryons, CDM, photons and neutrinos [3{5]. In quintessential inflation models, if reheating is not Since they are both based on the same idea, it is natu- prompt, a period of kination exists, where the kinetic den- ral to attempt to unify cosmic inflation with quintessence. sity of the inflaton is the dominant energy density in the Indeed, the mechanism in which a scalar field is both driv- Universe. During this period, the non-decaying mode for ing primordial inflation and causing the current accelerated gravitational waves is not suppressed and this produces a spike in the gravitational wave spectrum at high frequen- cies. The energy density of these gravitational waves may be large enough to disturb the BBN process. As such it is 1 by Laurence Krauss. constrained and provides an upper limit on the duration of kination. This, in turn, is a lower bound on the reheating missible. We investigate this issue in detail, but conserva- temperature. tively choose to avoid super-Planckian values for our non- The scalar potential in quintessential inflation typically canonical inflation field in our treatment. features two flat regions, which when traversed by the scalar We start with an overview of the model before noting field, result in accelerated expansion, provided that the how a change of reheating mechanism affects the num- scalar field dominates the Universe. These are called the ber of remaining inflationary e-folds since observable scales inflationary plateau and the quintessential tail and can lead left the horizon during primordial inflation. We calculate to the primordial and current accelerated expansion respec- the inflationary observables before investigating how the tively. Thus, the required potential is of runaway type, with quintessence requirements determine the parameter space the global minimum displaced at infinity, where the vacuum in a model with instant preheating. density is zero. The form of the quintessential potential is We use natural units, where c = ~ = 1 and −2 non trivial, especially since the two plateaus differ by more Newton's gravitational constant is 8πG = mP , with 18 100 mP = 2:43 10 GeV being the reduced Planck mass. than a factor of 10 in energy density. Consequently, one × needs to use a theoretical framework that is valid at both these extreme energy scales. THE MODEL A compelling way to naturally generate a scalar poten- tial with the desired two plateaus is the idea of α-attractors, The Scalar Potential which is heavily used in inflationary model building [15{37]. Recently, we have presented a new quintessential inflation We consider the following model: model along these lines [38]. Our model is in excellent agreement for inflationary observables with the CMB ob- = kin + V + Λ ; (1) servations [39]. In our paper in Ref. [38] we utilised the L L L where kin is the kinetic Lagrangian density, V is the po- mechanism of gravitational reheating to reheat the Uni- L L verse after inflation, in alignment with the economy of the tential Lagrangian density and Λ is a cosmological constant. quintessential inflation idea. However, gravitational reheat- The kinetic Lagrangian density is ing is notoriously inefficient, with a very low reheating tem- 1 (@φ)2 4 2 perature of approximately T 10 GeV. As a result, kin = 2 ; (2) reh L φ 2 ∼ (1 6αm2 ) the spike of gravitational waves due to kination is large − P enough to challenge the BBN process. This is the price to where α > 0 is a parameter. This is the standard, non- pay for economy. In this paper we generalise our approach canonical form in the context of α-attractors [15{18]. It and employ the instant preheating mechanism to reheat can be realised in supergravity theories, when the K¨ahler the Universe. Thus, we envisage a coupling between our manifold is not trivial, such that kin features poles, char- scalar field with some other degree of freedom such that, acterised by the α parameter. L after the end of inflation, the rapid variation of the infla- For the potential Lagrangian density, we consider a sim- ton's expectation value leads to non-perturbative particle ple exponential function (possibly due to gaugino conden- production, which generates the radiation bath of the hot sation [42{44]). Thus, we have big bang. The process is modulated by the coupling con- −κφ/mP stant g. If g is small enough, instant preheating becomes V = V (φ) = V0e : (3) comparable to gravitational reheating. Thus, in general we − L 4 where κ is a parameter (without loss of generality, we con- consider Treh > 10 GeV. sider κ > 0) and V0 is a constant density scale. The setup of α-attractors also has another beneficial con- In an effort to minimise its potential density, the ex- sequence, apart from generating the potential plateaus. It pectation value of the field φ grows in time. However, it has to do with the suppression of radiative corrections near cannot cross the poles at p6α mP [15{18]. Thus, starting the poles (so along the plateaus), which otherwise threaten in-between the poles, we± expect that it finally approaches to lift the flatness of the quintessential tail, as well as the p the value φ + 6α mP, which correspondsp to non-zero suppression of interactions, which would otherwise generate ! −κ 6α potential density V (p6α mP) = V0e . a 5th-force problem for quintessence. Both these problems We assume that, due to an unknown symmetry, the vac- plague models of quintessence and quintessential inflation uum density is zero.
Recommended publications
  • Supergravity and Its Legacy Prelude and the Play
    Supergravity and its Legacy Prelude and the Play Sergio FERRARA (CERN – LNF INFN) Celebrating Supegravity at 40 CERN, June 24 2016 S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 1 Supergravity as carved on the Iconic Wall at the «Simons Center for Geometry and Physics», Stony Brook S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 2 Prelude S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 3 In the early 1970s I was a staff member at the Frascati National Laboratories of CNEN (then the National Nuclear Energy Agency), and with my colleagues Aurelio Grillo and Giorgio Parisi we were investigating, under the leadership of Raoul Gatto (later Professor at the University of Geneva) the consequences of the application of “Conformal Invariance” to Quantum Field Theory (QFT), stimulated by the ongoing Experiments at SLAC where an unexpected Bjorken Scaling was observed in inclusive electron- proton Cross sections, which was suggesting a larger space-time symmetry in processes dominated by short distance physics. In parallel with Alexander Polyakov, at the time in the Soviet Union, we formulated in those days Conformal invariant Operator Product Expansions (OPE) and proposed the “Conformal Bootstrap” as a non-perturbative approach to QFT. S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 4 Conformal Invariance, OPEs and Conformal Bootstrap has become again a fashionable subject in recent times, because of the introduction of efficient new methods to solve the “Bootstrap Equations” (Riccardo Rattazzi, Slava Rychkov, Erik Tonni, Alessandro Vichi), and mostly because of their role in the AdS/CFT correspondence. The latter, pioneered by Juan Maldacena, Edward Witten, Steve Gubser, Igor Klebanov and Polyakov, can be regarded, to some extent, as one of the great legacies of higher dimensional Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • States with Regards to Finding If the Cosmological Constant Is, Or Is Not a ‘Vacuum’ Field Andrew Beckwith, [email protected]
    Consequences of squeezing initially coherent (semi classical) states with regards to finding if the cosmological constant is, or is not a ‘vacuum’ field Andrew Beckwith, [email protected], Abstract The following document is to prepare an analysis on if the cosmological constant is a vacuum field. Candidates for how to analyze this issue come up in terms of brane theory, modified treatments of WdM theory (pseudo time component added) and/ or how to look at squeezing of vacuum states, as initially coherent semi classical constructions, or string theory versions of coherent states. The article presents a thought experiment if there is a non zero graviton mass, and at the end, in the conclusion states experimental modeling criteria which may indicate if a non zero graviton mass is measurable, which would indicate the existence, de facto of a possible replacement for DE, based upon non zero mass gravitons, and indications for a replacement for a cosmological constant. Introduction: Dr. Karim1 mailed the author with the following question which will be put in quotes: The challenge of resolving the following question: At the Big Bang the only form of energy released is in the form of geometry – gravity. intense gravity field lifts vacuum fields to positive energies, So an electromagnetic vacuum of density 10122 kg/m3 should collapse under its own gravity. But this does not happen - that is one reason why the cosmological constant cannot be the vacuum field. Why? Answering this question delves into what the initial state of the universe should be, in terms of either vacuum energy, or something else.
    [Show full text]
  • GSS: Gauge and String Theories
    GSS: Gauge and String Theories S. Bellucci (Resp.), S. Ferrara (Ass.), S. Krivonos (Osp.), A. Sutulin (Bors. PD), B.N. Tiwari (Ospite), A. Yeranyan (Bors. Fermi Institute) Research Activity S. Ferrara investigated different aspects of black-hole physics, which include a classification of charge- orbits for extremal single-center black holes and first-order flows of extremal black holes with different BPS properties. He also investigated some aspects of multi-center black holes and, in particular, the classification of two-center orbits and first order flows for multi-center composites. He studied several aspects of supersymmetry breaking. Applications to Particle Physics or to inflation rest on N=1 spontaneously broken supergravity where some multiplets mediate supersymmetry breaking while others accommodate the inflaton. The supersymmetric extension of the Starobinsky model depends on the off-shell formulation of the local supersymmetry algebra. This allows one to show the equivalence of this higher curvature theory to a standard Einstein supergravity. Depending on the chosen formulation the model corresponds to supergravity coupled either to two massive chiral multiplets, one of which is the goldstino multiplet, or to a massive vector multiplet. He also introduced a set of minimal models, where the inflaton sector is described by a single scalar field (with D term and Fayet-Iliopoulos term generating potential), unlike in models based on chiral multiplets based on an F-term potential. In minimal models the scalaron is dual to the inflaton, and being the member of a massive vector multiplet, it is the superpartner of the Stueckelberg field. Subsequently, replacing the Goldstino multiplet with its non-linear realization via a nilpotent superfield, he arrived at a new universal Volkov-Akulov-Starobinsky Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Hep-Th/0209231 V1 26 Sep 2002 Tbs,Daai N Uigi Eurdfrsae Te Hntetemlvcu Olead to Vacuum Thermal the Anisotropy
    SLAC-PUB-9533 BRX TH-505 October 2002 SU-ITP-02/02 Initial conditions for inflation Nemanja Kaloper1;2, Matthew Kleban1, Albion Lawrence1;3;4, Stephen Shenker1 and Leonard Susskind1 1Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 2Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 3Brandeis University Physics Department, MS 057, POB 549110, Waltham, MA 02454y 4SLAC Theory Group, MS 81, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Free scalar fields in de Sitter space have a one-parameter family of states invariant under the de Sitter group, including the standard thermal vacuum. We show that, except for the thermal vacuum, these states are unphysical when gravitational interactions are arXiv:hep-th/0209231 v1 26 Sep 2002 included. We apply these observations to the quantum state of the inflaton, and find that at best, dramatic fine tuning is required for states other than the thermal vacuum to lead to observable features in the CMBR anisotropy. y Present and permanent address. *Work supported in part by Department of Energy Contract DE-AC03-76SF00515. 1. Introduction In inflationary cosmology, cosmic microwave background (CMB) data place a tanta- lizing upper bound on the vacuum energy density during the inflationary epoch: 4 V M 4 1016 GeV : (1:1) ∼ GUT ∼ Here MGUT is the \unification scale" in supersymmetric grand unified models, as predicted by the running of the observed strong, weak and electromagnetic couplings above 1 T eV in the minimal supersymmetric standard model. If this upper bound is close to the truth, the vacuum energy can be measured directly with detectors sensitive to the polarization of the CMBR.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Program
    PROGRAM Monday morning, July 13th La Sapienza Roma - Aula Magna 09:00 - 10:00 Inaugural Session Chairperson: Paolo de Bernardis Welcoming addresses Remo Ruffini (ICRANet), Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat (French Académie des Sciences), Jose’ Funes (Vatican City), Ricardo Neiva Tavares (Ambassador of Brazil), Sargis Ghazaryan (Ambassador of Armenia), Francis Everitt (Stanford University) and Chris Fryer (University of Arizona) Marcel Grossmann Awards Yakov Sinai, Martin Rees, Sachiko Tsuruta, Ken’Ichi Nomoto, ESA (acceptance speech by Johann-Dietrich Woerner, ESA Director General) Lectiones Magistrales Yakov Sinai (Princeton University) 10:00 - 10:35 Deterministic chaos Martin Rees (University of Cambridge) 10:35 - 11:10 How our understanding of cosmology and black holes has been revolutionised since the 1960s 11:10 - 11:35 Group Picture - Coffee Break Gerard 't Hooft (University of Utrecht) 11:35 - 12:10 Local Conformal Symmetry in Black Holes, Standard Model, and Quantum Gravity Plenary Session: Mathematics and GR Katarzyna Rejzner (University of York) 12:10 - 12:40 Effective quantum gravity observables and locally covariant QFT Zvi Bern (UCLA Physics & Astronomy) 12:40 - 13:10 Ultraviolet surprises in quantum gravity 14:30 - 18:00 Parallel Session 18:45 - 20:00 Stephen Hawking (teleconference) (University of Cambridge) Public Lecture Fire in the Equations Monday afternoon, July 13th Code Classroom Title Chairperson AC2 ChN1 MHD processes near compact objects Sergej Moiseenko FF Extended Theories of Gravity and Quantum Salvatore Capozziello, Gabriele AT1 A Cabibbo Cosmology Gionti AT3 A FF3 Wormholes, Energy Conditions and Time Machines Francisco Lobo Localized selfgravitating field systems in the AT4 FF6 Dmitry Galtsov, Michael Volkov Einstein and alternatives theories of gravity BH1:Binary Black Holes as Sources of Pablo Laguna, Anatoly M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ads₄/CFT₃ and Quantum Gravity
    AdS/CFT and quantum gravity Ioannis Lavdas To cite this version: Ioannis Lavdas. AdS/CFT and quantum gravity. Mathematical Physics [math-ph]. Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2019. English. NNT : 2019PSLEE041. tel-02966558 HAL Id: tel-02966558 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02966558 Submitted on 14 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Prepar´ ee´ a` l’Ecole´ Normale Superieure´ AdS4/CF T3 and Quantum Gravity Soutenue par Composition du jury : Ioannis Lavdas Costas BACHAS Le 03 octobre 2019 Ecole´ Normale Superieure Directeur de These Guillaume BOSSARD Ecole´ Polytechnique Membre du Jury o Ecole´ doctorale n 564 Elias KIRITSIS Universite´ Paris-Diderot et Universite´ de Rapporteur Physique en ˆIle-de-France Crete´ Michela PETRINI Sorbonne Universite´ President´ du Jury Nicholas WARNER University of Southern California Membre du Jury Specialit´ e´ Alberto ZAFFARONI Physique Theorique´ Universita´ Milano-Bicocca Rapporteur Contents Introduction 1 I 3d N = 4 Superconformal Theories and type IIB Supergravity Duals6 1 3d N = 4 Superconformal Theories7 1.1 N = 4 supersymmetric gauge theories in three dimensions..............7 1.2 Linear quivers and their Brane Realizations...................... 10 1.3 Moduli Space and Symmetries............................
    [Show full text]
  • Singlet Glueballs in Klebanov-Strassler Theory
    Singlet Glueballs In Klebanov-Strassler Theory A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY IVAN GORDELI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy ARKADY VAINSHTEIN April, 2016 c IVAN GORDELI 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my scientific adviser - Arkady Vainshtein for his incredible patience and support throughout the course of my Ph.D. program. I would also like to thank my committee members for taking time to read and review my thesis, namely Ronald Poling, Mikhail Shifman and Alexander Voronov. I am deeply grateful to Vasily Pestun for his support and motivation. Same applies to my collaborators Dmitry Melnikov and Anatoly Dymarsky who have suggested this research topic to me. I am thankful to my other collaborator - Peter Koroteev. I would like to thank Emil Akhmedov, A.Yu. Morozov, Andrey Mironov, M.A. Olshanetsky, Antti Niemi, K.A. Ter-Martirosyan, M.B. Voloshin, Andrey Levin, Andrei Losev, Alexander Gorsky, S.M. Kozel, S.S. Gershtein, M. Vysotsky, Alexander Grosberg, Tony Gherghetta, R.B. Nevzorov, D.I. Kazakov, M.V. Danilov, A. Chervov and all other great teachers who have shaped everything I know about Theoretical Physics. I am deeply grateful to all my friends and colleagues who have contributed to discus- sions and supported me throughout those years including A. Arbuzov, L. Kushnir, K. Kozlova, A. Shestov, V. Averina, A. Talkachova, A. Talkachou, A. Abyzov, V. Poberezh- niy, A. Alexandrov, G. Nozadze, S. Solovyov, A. Zotov, Y. Chernyakov, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Holes and Qubits
    Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 119, Vatican City 2014 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv119/sv119-duff.pdf Black Holes and Qubits MICHAEL J. D UFF Blackett Labo ratory, Imperial C ollege London Abstract Quantum entanglement lies at the heart of quantum information theory, with applications to quantum computing, teleportation, cryptography and communication. In the apparently separate world of quantum gravity, the Hawking effect of radiating black holes has also occupied centre stage. Despite their apparent differences, it turns out that there is a correspondence between the two. Introduction Whenever two very different areas of theoretical physics are found to share the same mathematics, it frequently leads to new insights on both sides. Here we describe how knowledge of string theory and M-theory leads to new discoveries about Quantum Information Theory (QIT) and vice-versa (Duff 2007; Kallosh and Linde 2006; Levay 2006). Bekenstein-Hawking entropy Every object, such as a star, has a critical size determined by its mass, which is called the Schwarzschild radius. A black hole is any object smaller than this. Once something falls inside the Schwarzschild radius, it can never escape. This boundary in spacetime is called the event horizon. So the classical picture of a black hole is that of a compact object whose gravitational field is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. Yet in 1974 Stephen Hawking showed that quantum black holes are not entirely black but may radiate energy, due to quantum mechanical effects in curved spacetime. In that case, they must possess the thermodynamic quantity called entropy.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflation from Nilpotent Kähler Corrections
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Inflation from nilpotent Kähler corrections This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. JCAP11(2016)028 (http://iopscience.iop.org/1475-7516/2016/11/028) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 131.169.210.43 This content was downloaded on 16/11/2016 at 12:20 Please note that terms and conditions apply. You may also be interested in: General sGoldstino inflation Sergio Ferrara and Diederik Roest Robust Inflation from fibrous strings C.P. Burgess, M. Cicoli, S. de Alwis et al. Inflation and dark energy with a single superfield Andrei Linde, Diederik Roest and Marco Scalisi On inflation, cosmological constant, and SUSY breaking Andrei Linde Cosmological attractors and asymptotic freedom of the inflaton field Renata Kallosh and Andrei Linde Perturbative stability along the supersymmetric directions of the landscape Kepa Sousa and Pablo Ortiz Inflation and uplifting with nilpotent superfields Renata Kallosh and Andrei Linde ournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics JAn IOP and SISSA journal Inflation from nilpotent K¨ahler corrections JCAP11(2016)028 Evan McDonougha and Marco Scalisib aErnest Rutherford Physics Building, McGill University, 3600 University Street, Montr´eal QC, H3A 2T8 Canada bDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Notkestraße 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received September 17, 2016 Accepted November 4, 2016 Published November 11, 2016 Abstract. We develop a new class of supergravity cosmological models where inflation is induced by terms in the K¨ahler potential which mix a nilpotent superfield S with a chiral sector Φ.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Lisa Dyson
    DR. LISA DYSON BIO Dr. Dyson is the CEO of Air Protein, which is focused on feeding the world's population with food made from the most sustainable protein, protein that is made from elements found in the air. Using a proprietary probiotic production process, Air Protein is forging the way into a new era of sustainable food production, and has introduced the world's first food from CO2. Watch Dr. Dyson’s TED Talk about the technology here. Dr. Dyson is also the CEO of Kiverdi, which is remaking supply chains with carbon transformation. Dr. Dyson is a scientist and entrepreneur to her core, taught to solve problems. She was raised by an entrepreneur where she saw ideas come to fruition and she thrives when she is able to use her scientific knowledge to solve problems that are good for business and good for the planet. Lisa has spent the last decade of her career working on climate-positive technologies. As a mission-driven entrepreneur, Dr. Dyson is passionate about challenging business leaders to adopt innovative, sustainable ways of producing. EXPERIENCE AND BACKGROUND ● Management Consultant at The Boston Consulting Group ● PhD in physics from MIT ● Bachelor’s Degree in Mathematics and Physics from Brandeis University ● Master of Science and Fulbright Scholar at the Imperial College London ● Conducted research in bioengineering, energy and physics at Stanford University, UC Berkeley, and Princeton University ACCOLADES ● Inc Magazine - Top 100 Female Founders 2019 ● 2019 Verge Vanguard Award ● Most Creative People in Business 2017 by Fast Company ● San Francisco Business Times’ Forever Influential Honor Roll ● C3E award from MIT and the Department of Energy for her entrepreneurial leadership in energy Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Cosmology: Island Universes, Cosmological Perturbations and Dark Energy
    TOPICS IN COSMOLOGY: ISLAND UNIVERSES, COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS AND DARK ENERGY by SOURISH DUTTA Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Department of Physics CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August 2007 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. To the people who have believed in me. Contents Dedication iv List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Abstract xiv 1 The Standard Cosmology 1 1.1 Observational Motivations for the Hot Big Bang Model . 1 1.1.1 Homogeneity and Isotropy . 1 1.1.2 Cosmic Expansion . 2 1.1.3 Cosmic Microwave Background . 3 1.2 The Robertson-Walker Metric and Comoving Co-ordinates . 6 1.3 Distance Measures in an FRW Universe . 11 1.3.1 Proper Distance . 12 1.3.2 Luminosity Distance . 14 1.3.3 Angular Diameter Distance . 16 1.4 The Friedmann Equation . 18 1.5 Model Universes . 21 1.5.1 An Empty Universe . 22 1.5.2 Generalized Flat One-Component Models . 22 1.5.3 A Cosmological Constant Dominated Universe . 24 1.5.4 de Sitter space . 26 1.5.5 Flat Matter Dominated Universe . 27 1.5.6 Curved Matter Dominated Universe . 28 1.5.7 Flat Radiation Dominated Universe . 30 1.5.8 Matter Radiation Equality . 32 1.6 Gravitational Lensing . 34 1.7 The Composition of the Universe .
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of Debate with Stephen
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server SU-ITP 02-11 hep-th/0204027 Twenty Years of Debate with Stephen L. Susskind Department of Physics Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4060 Abstract This is my contribution to Stephen Hawking's 60th birthday party. Happy Birth- day Stephen! 1 Crisis and Paradigm Shift Stephen, as we all know, is by far the most stubborn and infuriating person in the universe. My own scientific relation with him I think can be called adversarial. We have disagreed profoundly about deep issues concerning black holes, information and all that kind of thing. At times he has caused me to pull my hair out in frustration – and you can plainly see the result. I can assure you that when we began to argue more than two decades ago, Ihadafullheadofhair. I can also say that of all the physicists I have known he has had the strongest influence on me and on my thinking. Just about everything I have thought about since 1980 has in one way or another been a response to his profoundly insightful question about the fate of information that falls into a black hole [1]. While I firmly believe his answer was wrong, the question and his insistence on a convincing answer has forced us to rethink the foundations of physics. The result is a wholly new paradigm that is now taking shape. I am deeply honored to be here to celebrate Stephen’s monumental contributions and especially his magnificent stubbornness.
    [Show full text]