Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
By Patrick James Barry a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The
CONFIRMATION BIAS: STAGED STORYTELLING IN SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARINGS by Patrick James Barry A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Enoch Brater, Chair Associate Professor Martha Jones Professor Sidonie Smith Emeritus Professor James Boyd White TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITES OF THEATRICALITY 1 CHAPTER 2 SITES OF STORYTELLING 32 CHAPTER 3 THE TAUNTING OF AMERICA: THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARING OF ROBERT BORK 55 CHAPTER 4 POISON IN THE EAR: THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARING OF CLARENCE THOMAS 82 CHAPTER 5 THE WISE LATINA: THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARING OF SONIA SOTOMAYOR 112 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION: CONFIRMATION CRITIQUE 141 WORK CITED 166 ii CHAPTER 1 SITES OF THEATRICALITY The theater is a place where a nation thinks in public in front of itself. --Martin Esslin, An Anatomy of Drama (1977)1 The Supreme Court confirmation process—once a largely behind-the-scenes affair—has lately moved front-and-center onto the public stage. --Laurence Tribe, Advice and Consent (1992)2 I. In 1975 Milner Ball, then a law professor at the University of Georgia, published an article in the Stanford Law Review called “The Play’s the Thing: An Unscientific Reflection on Trials Under the Rubric of Theater.” In it, Ball argued that by looking at the actions that take place in a courtroom as a “type of theater,” we might better understand the nature of these actions and “thereby make a small contribution to an understanding of the role of law in our society.”3 At the time, Ball’s view that courtroom action had an important “theatrical quality”4 was a minority position, even a 1 Esslin, Martin. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 158 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2012 No. 165 House of Representatives The House met at noon and was Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- That the Senate passed S. 3202. called to order by the Speaker pro tem- nal stands approved. That the Senate passed S. 3698. pore (Mr. DOLD). Appointments: f United States-China Economic Security f PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Review Commission. DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER With best wishes, I am The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the Sincerely, PRO TEMPORE gentlewoman from Kansas (Ms. JEN- KAREN L. HAAS. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- KINS) come forward and lead the House fore the House the following commu- in the Pledge of Allegiance. f nication from the Speaker: Ms. JENKINS led the Pledge of Alle- WASHINGTON, DC, giance as follows: ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER December 20, 2012. I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the PRO TEMPORE I hereby appoint the Honorable ROBERT J. United States of America, and to the Repub- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The DOLD to act as Speaker pro tempore on this lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Chair will entertain up to 15 requests day. indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. JOHN A. BOEHNER, for 1-minute speeches on each side of Speaker of the House of Representatives. f the aisle. f COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE f PRAYER The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- ESTATE TAX The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick fore the House the following commu- J. -
Written Testimony of Michael J. Gerhardt, Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, University of North Carolina A
Written Testimony of Michael J. Gerhardt, Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Submitted to Presidential Commission on the United States Supreme Court, August 9, 2021 1 Introduction and Overview My name is Michael Gerhardt. I am currently Burton Craige Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Scholar in Residence at the National Constitution Center, and the inaugural Richard Beeman Visiting Scholar and Senior Lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.1 I appreciate the invitation to submit written testimony to the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States (hereafter “the Commission”). As directed, my written testimony will focus on the major subject matters that the Commission has been established to address in Executive Order 14023 (April 9, 2021). While I only speak for myself and in my individual capacity in this testimony, the views and recommendations expressed herein are informed by my experiences within the Supreme Court selection process and by my research and scholarship, including the book The Federal Appointments Process (Duke University Press, revised edition 2000). From 2009 to 2021, I have had the honor and privilege of serving as Special Counsel to the Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee for the Supreme Court nominations of Sonia Sotomayor (2009), Elena Kagan (2010), Neil Gorsuch (2016), Brett Kavanaugh (2018), and Amy Coney Barrett (2020). In addition, I testified as an expert witness during the confirmation proceedings for Justice Samuel Alito (2006), was Special Counsel to the Ranking Member on the nomination of John Roberts as Chief Justice of the United States (2005), served as Special Counsel to the Clinton White House for the nomination of Stephen Breyer to the Supreme Court (1994), and was one of the eight members of the Clinton-Gore Justice Department 1 I am grateful to Albert F. -
Congressional Record—Senate S6699
September 24, 2013 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S6699 a bipartisan bill—House leaders took cans get back on their feet. Despite the The clerk will call the roll. the unprecedented step earlier this heated rhetoric, our Food Stamp Pro- The assistant legislative clerk called year and split food assistance from the gram is working as intended. the roll. other essential programs supported by I was fortunate to come here when Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the the farm bill, even though we passed a we had two men with entirely different Senator from New Hampshire (Mrs. farm bill that would save $25 to $30 bil- philosophies. Both men became nomi- SHAHEEN) and the Senator from Colo- lion. nees of their party to run for Presi- rado (Mr. UDALL) are necessarily ab- After months of delay, last week the dent, George McGovern and Bob Dole. sent. House voted on a separate nutrition They worked together to feed the hun- The PRESIDING OFFICER (Ms. title, which only moves us further gry people in this country, especially HEITKAMP). Are there any other Sen- away from enacting a farm bill before in the School Lunch Program. ators in the Chamber desiring to vote? the programs expire on September 30. The Congressional Budget Office The result was announced—yeas 98, This latest lurching maneuver means forecasts that the SNAP costs will fall nays 0, as follows: over the next several years. As the even more uncertainty for farmers. [Rollcall Vote No. 204 Ex.] economy improves and people get back Instead of standing with the millions YEAS—98 of Americans who are still struggling to work, those costs will come down. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 159 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 2013 No. 93 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was receive the Nobel Prize and Pulitzer To say this championship winning called to order by the Speaker pro tem- Prize for literature. A prolific writer, game was a nail-biter would be an un- pore (Mr. RIBBLE). she also advocated on behalf of wom- derstatement. The Blackhawks came f en’s rights and minority groups, while from behind twice to overcome an her efforts for her care and adoption of amazing effort by the Boston Bruins, DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Asian and mixed-race children are leg- scoring two goals just 17 seconds apart TEMPORE endary. Pearl Buck will be remembered in the final minute and a half of the The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- for her achievements as well as for her game. Unbelievable goals scored by fore the House the following commu- writing. Bryan Bickell and Dave Bolland en- nication from the Speaker: And we acknowledge the renovation sured their names will be inscribed for- ever in Blackhawk history books as WASHINGTON, DC, recently of her 19th century farmhouse June 26, 2013. in Bucks County, notably a national well as on Lord Stanley’s Cup. I hereby appoint the Honorable REID J. historic landmark that will be sus- With outstanding efforts by Captain RIBBLE to act as Speaker pro tempore on this tained for new generations to learn and Jonathan Toews; Conn Smythe winner, day. -
Transcript of Public Comments from July 8, 2020 Healthy CA for All Commission Meeting
Transcript of Public Comments from July 8, 2020 Healthy CA for All Commission Meeting 1. The following table shows public comments that were made verbally during the virtual meeting: Count Name Verbal Public Comments 1 Francis Lee Thank you. Hi, my name is Francis Lee. I'm an at large delegate to the California Democratic National Convention for California. I just wanted to point out that the environmental analysis report published at the previous meeting seemed to rely on a lot of data coming studies analyzing costs in 2014. And there have been a number of more recent studies, for example, published in January of this year in the Annals of Internal Medicine, analyzing costs in 2017 showing $800 billion a year in administrative overhead for health care of which over $200 billion dollars a year attributed directly to private insurance billing overhead. So, it seems hard to believe that a mixed model of private and public options can be a solution to control our out of control spending costs. I think this is a strong argument in favor of single payer coverage. Thank you. 2 Hal No affiliation. I'm just a public citizen. But I've been interested in Goldfarb single payer for a number of years. And what I want to know is what is different about this moment in history that is different all the previous moments in history when we've been fighting for single payer in this country since at least the 70s. At least PNHP goes back that far. How are we going to get single payer when we have a political party supposed to be representing the people, supposedly the People's Party, that stands in the way of us getting single payer? Many of the democrats are on payroll with these companies, I mean, not payroll, but you know what I mean? So, I don't see how this is going to happen.