DOCSLIB.ORG

TRUMP the TRUTH Free Expression in the President’S First 100 Days

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRUMP the TRUTH Free Expression in the President’S First 100 Days TRUMP THE TRUTH Free Expression in the President’s First 100 Days 1 TRUMP THE TRUTH Free Expression in the President’s First 100 Days April 27, 2017 © 2017 PEN America. All rights reserved. PEN America stands at the intersection of literature and human rights to protect open expression in the United States and worldwide. We champion the freedom to write, recognizing the power of the word to transform the world. Our mission is to unite writers and their allies to celebrate creative expression and defend the liberties that make it possible. Founded in 1922, PEN America is the largest of more than 100 centers of PEN International. Our strength is in our membership—a nationwide community of more than 4,000 novelists, journalists, poets, essayists, playwrights, editors, publishers, translators, agents, and other writing professionals. For more information, visit pen.org. Cover photograph: President Trump at the Conservative Political Action Conference. Credit Gage Skidmore. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ATTACKS ON THE TRUTH 6 UNDERMINING THE PRESS 8 Antagonizing the Press 8 Attacking Individual Reporters and News Outlets 9 Calling For Reporters to Be Fired 10 Threatening to Change Libel Laws 11 Accusing Media of Lying 11 Restricting Press Access to the State Department 13 Other Trends of Concern 14 INTOLERANCE OF DISSENTING VIEWPOINTS 15 Responses to Protests 15 Response to Internal Criticism 16 GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY 17 Website Data Takedowns 17 Undercutting Congressional Oversight 17 Gag Orders on Federal Agencies 17 OTHER INFRINGEMENTS ON FREE EXPRESSION 18 Free Expression at the Border 18 Free Expression, Artistic Expression, and the Budget 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 21 APPENDIX: PRESIDENT TRUMP'S 100 DAYS 22 ENDNOTES 43 INTRODUCTION This report evaluates President Trump’s first 100 days in office from the standpoint of how his words, actions, and It is not normal for the policies have affected free expression, including upholding the truth, respect for the work of the press, freedom of President of the United assembly, government transparency and access to infor- mation, and other areas. States to refuse to offer The information compiled in this report provides a snapshot of the beginning of Trump’s term. PEN America’s even passing respect to the key findings include: idea that telling the truth • PEN America has catalogued at least 76 instances in which President Trump and/or his Administration have matters. It is not normal for undermined the work of the press in his first 100 days in office. These instances include President Trump’s the President to pretend frequent attacks on the media as “dishonest” and den- igration of news outlets as “fake news,” individual at- that any news coverage he tacks on reporters or media outlets, and restrictions on press access to the Administration. These instances are dislikes is “fake news” damaging to the principle that an independent press plays an important role in a democracy by holding that has been fabricated elected leaders accountable and providing the public with insight into the workings of government. by reporters who made up • The President’s decision to make statements that are the story as well as demonstrably false, which is documented on a near- daily basis, and to repeat these falsehoods even after their sources. they have been repeatedly debunked, undermines the truth, provides fodder for conspiracy theorists, and threatens the basis of democratic debate, which can- • Proposals to require travelers entering the United not function without a set of commonly agreed-upon States to give border agents access to their personal facts as the basis for further discussion. devices, including passwords to social media accounts, could have a widespread chilling effect on speech and • Statements by the President and some lawmakers would violate travelers’ human rights to privacy and suggesting that protest participants have been paid free expression. or are “professionals,” without evidence to support the claim, delegitimize the constitutionally-protected Much discussion has been devoted to how much damage expression of dissenting viewpoints and may feed into will be done by the President’s disregard for the truth efforts by states to roll back protections on the right and attacks on the press as the “enemy of the people.” to peaceful assembly. Trump is certainly not the first president to ever make a false statement. President Obama, who ran on a promise • The White House’s rejection of expressions of dis- of transparency, also had a contentious relationship with agreement from inside the government risks sending the press. And his Justice Department faced withering a message to government employees that efforts to criticism for pursuing more leaks prosecutions—several debate or challenge policies may put their jobs at risk. of which implicated journalists in ways that raised serious press freedom concerns—under the Espionage Act than • Initial indications that some government transparency all others combined.1 measures are being rolled back—such as ending the There are some early signs that the public is losing con- practice of releasing White House visitor logs and the fidence in Trump’s trustworthiness, and that his efforts removal of previously publicly available data from exec- to undermine the press have not had much impact to utive agency websites—raise concerns that the public’s date—although public trust in the media was already at right to access information about the government’s historic lows, and news institutions have their own work to activities is being infringed upon. do to rebuild that trust. A recent Vanity Fair/60 Minutes 4 PEN AMERICA Women’s March protesters, San Diego, California, January 21, 2017 poll indicated that support for press freedom may be in a free society, and to insist that facts, not propaganda, declining among Republicans, 36% of whom said it “does form the basis of political debate and decision making. The more harm than good.”2 Journalists have, for the most American public is also rising to the challenge, turning out part, responded to his efforts to attack their credibility in the streets to protest policies with which they disagree, and denigrate their work by simply continuing to do their contacting their representatives and packing town hall jobs—and by all accounts, this Administration ’s publicly meetings, and making their voices heard at a level not voiced hostility to the media does not impede them from seen for many years. talking, frequently and in great numbers, to reporters. The These early indications of resistance are heartening. But Administration also deserves some praise for measures they should not obscure the fact that what this Adminis- like making White House briefings more accessible to tration is doing—the relentless lies, the constant efforts to reporters based outside of Washington with the addition chip away at public support for the press and trust in their of “Skype seats” in the briefing room.3 reporting, the dismissal of peaceful public demonstrations Some have even argued that Trump’s public attacks as illegitimate—is not normal. It is not normal for the Pres- on the press are mostly for show and that, in private, he ident of the United States to refuse to offer even passing and his Administration are engaging intensively and often respect to the idea that telling the truth matters. It is not cooperatively with members of the press in an effort to normal for the President of the United States to pretend shape and burnish his image.4 Regardless of whether and that any news coverage he dislikes is “fake news” that has to what degree that is true, the messages and attitudes been fabricated by reporters who made up the story as conveyed publicly by the White House have broad and well as their sources. It is harmful to our democracy and to damaging repercussions. Many policymakers from both our respect for the Constitution, and we all—whatever our BONZO MCGRUE BONZO parties have continued to defend the role of the press political affiliation—must continue to stand up and say so. TRUMP THE TRUTH: FREE EXPRESSION IN THE PRESIDENT’S FIRST 100 DAYS 5 a presidential pronouncement. Presidents are expected ATTACKS ON to try to elevate the quality of political discourse, to re- mind us of our shared principles and values. Trump’s lies THE TRUTH cheapen and degrade our politics and the ideals that un- dergird the nation. A unique challenge posed to free expression by Pres- To illustrate the serious consequences wrought by ident Trump is his propensity to lie. President Trump’s Trump’s untruths, however casually he asserts them, con- tendency to make statements that are verifiably false has sider his lie that millions of people voted illegally in the been well-documented in the press. Both the Toronto 2016 election, a claim he first made on Twitter on Nov. 27.9 Star and The Washington Post keep running tallies of the He has repeated this lie several times, on some occasions President’s falsehoods; as of Apr. 26 the Star had counted also claiming—without any evidence—that those who voted 212 “bald-faced lies, exaggerations and deceptions the illegally were undocumented immigrants.10 The lie appears President of the United States of America has said, so far,” to have originated from Infowars, a conspiracy theory site and The Post had listed 414 “false or misleading claims.”5 run by radio host Alex Jones, who also claims the Sandy He lies so much that it has spurred efforts to create a more Hook school massacre was a hoax, and that both the 1995 precise terminology to refer to the variety of falsehoods Oklahoma City and the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were he utters—“untruths,” “debunked claims,” “claims with no orchestrated by the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cnn Debate Live Stream
    Cnn debate live stream Continue Cutting cable is not too difficult if you are watching sports, in which case it is a nightmare. Huh989 over at Hackerspace wants to know: how do you stream sports, and sports packages are there worth it? Cable TV is insanely expensive, and with all the cheapest video services out there, it's easy to cut... MorePhoto Ed Yourdon.I have two things that, until recently, combined to reduce the quality of my life. These two things More Today is the final Republican debate before Super Tuesday-day a whopping twelve states and one U.S. territory will have either a primary or caucus. That's how to stream it online without cable. Before the general election, each state has its own primaries and caucuses, and today's Iowa caucuses ... Read more in the debate of the other five Republican presidential candidates: Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich. This is the last debate for Super Tuesday next week. On Tuesday, March 1, twelve states (Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and Virginia) and one U.S. territory (American Samoa) will hold either primary or caucuses. If you live in any of these areas, this is your last chance to watch the debate before it's time to help choose your candidate. The debate begins at 8:30 p.m. ET / 5:30 p.m. PT. Here's how you can stream it online: If you're a satellite radio subscriber, you can listen on SiriusXM Channel 115.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts
    SHAW.TOPRINTER (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2017 3:32 AM Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts Katherine Shaw* Abstract The President’s words play a unique role in American public life. No other figure speaks with the reach, range, or authority of the President. The President speaks to the entire population, about the full range of domestic and international issues we collectively confront, and on behalf of the country to the rest of the world. Speech is also a key tool of presidential governance: For at least a century, Presidents have used the bully pulpit to augment their existing constitutional and statutory authorities. But what sort of impact, if any, should presidential speech have in court, if that speech is plausibly related to the subject matter of a pending case? Curiously, neither judges nor scholars have grappled with that question in any sustained way, though citations to presidential speech appear with some frequency in judicial opinions. Some of the time, these citations are no more than passing references. Other times, presidential statements play a significant role in judicial assessments of the meaning, lawfulness, or constitutionality of either legislation or executive action. This Article is the first systematic examination of presidential speech in the courts. Drawing on a number of cases in both the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts, I first identify the primary modes of judicial reliance on presidential speech. I next ask what light the law of evidence, principles of deference, and internal executive branch dynamics can shed on judicial treatment of presidential speech.
    [Show full text]
  • July 15, 2020 Chris Cuomo CNN Press Room 30 Hudson Yards, Fl
    July 15, 2020 Chris Cuomo ℅ CNN Press Room 30 Hudson Yards, Fl 21 New York, NY 10001 Thank you for sharing your health journey Dear Mr. Cuomo, I reluctantly admit I haven’t been watching much TV news lately. Sometimes, the news is just too much to bear. My sense of dread is compounded by my nearly 12 year struggle as caregiver for a loved one with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, also called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or ME/CFS. There are times when it’s really hard to keep going. The world feels exceptionally dark right now. And yet, last night you gave me hope. And, for that I am in your debt. During your Tuesday segment, you opened up about your personal experiences and challenging health journey since contracting COVID-19. You courageously shared your personal and firsthand concerns related to ME/CFS, intimately described the symptoms of the post-viral disease, and illustrated their very real impacts on daily life. As a result, you gave a voice to COVID-19 “long haulers” who live in fear of an uncertain future, terrified that they may never recover their health. You even used the appropriate name of the disease, ME—a rare acknowledgement by a national news outlet. By sharing your own journey, you lent a trusted, credible voice of reassurance and validation, for so many, that this experience is real. The segment may have been only a few minutes, but you spoke volumes to a community that faces daily hardships. In short, you told millions of people with ME/CFS, and those with lasting COVID-19 symptoms, that they aren’t alone or crazy.
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty's Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism
    Ash Center Occasional Papers Tony Saich, Series Editor Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism Joshua Forstenzer University of Sheffield (UK) July 2018 Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center Occasional Papers Series Series Editor Tony Saich Deputy Editor Jessica Engelman The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excellence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion. By training the very best leaders, developing powerful new ideas, and disseminating innovative solutions and institutional reforms, the Center’s goal is to meet the profound challenges facing the world’s citizens. The Ford Foundation is a founding donor of the Center. Additional information about the Ash Center is available at ash.harvard.edu. This research paper is one in a series funded by the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. The views expressed in the Ash Center Occasional Papers Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series are intended to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. This paper is copyrighted by the author(s). It cannot be reproduced or reused without permission. Ash Center Occasional Papers Tony Saich, Series Editor Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism Joshua Forstenzer University of Sheffield (UK) July 2018 Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School Letter from the Editor The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excellence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:13-Cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15
    Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-cv-03994 (WHP) JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his ECF CASE official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 18 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Of counsel: Michael D. Steger Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie Steger Krane LLP Rob Tricchinelli 1601 Broadway, 12th Floor The Reporters Committee New York, NY 10019 for Freedom of the Press (212) 736-6800 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 [email protected] Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 807-2100 Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………………1 ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………2 I. The integrity of a confidential reporter-source relationship is critical to producing good journalism, and mass telephone call tracking compromises that relationship to the detriment of the public interest……………………………………….2 A There is a long history of journalists breaking significant stories by relying on information from confidential sources…………………………….4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Disregard: Trump's Authoritarianism During the COVID
    INTENTIONAL DISREGARD Trump’s Authoritarianism During the COVID-19 Pandemic August 2020 This report is dedicated to those who have suffered and lost their lives to the COVID-19 virus and to their loved ones. Acknowledgments This report was co-authored by Sylvia Albert, Keshia Morris Desir, Yosef Getachew, Liz Iacobucci, Beth Rotman, Paul S. Ryan and Becky Timmons. The authors thank the 1.5 million Common Cause supporters whose small-dollar donations fund more than 70% of our annual budget for our nonpartisan work strengthening the people’s voice in our democracy. Thank you to the Common Cause National Governing Board for its leadership and support. We also thank Karen Hobert Flynn for guidance and editing, Aaron Scherb for assistance with content, Melissa Brown Levine for copy editing, Kerstin Vogdes Diehn for design, and Scott Blaine Swenson for editing and strategic communications support. This report is complete as of August 5, 2020. ©2020 Common Cause. Printed in-house. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................ 3 President Trump’s ad-lib pandemic response has undermined government institutions and failed to provide states with critically needed medical supplies. .............5 Divider in Chief: Trump’s Politicization of the Pandemic .................................... 9 Trump has amplified special interest-funded “liberate” protests and other “reopen” efforts, directly contradicting public health guidance. ...................9 Trump and his enablers in the Senate have failed to appropriate adequate funds to safely run this year’s elections. .........................................11 President Trump has attacked voting by mail—the safest, most secure way to cast ballots during the pandemic—for purely personal, partisan advantage. ..............12 The Trump administration has failed to safeguard the health of detained and incarcerated individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Nate Silver's Punditry Revolution
    Nate Silver’s punditry revolution By Cameron S. Brown Jerusalem Post, November 6, 2012 Whether or not US President Barack Obama is re-elected will not just determine the future of politics, it is also likely to influence the future of political punditry as well. The media has been following the US elections with two very, very different narratives. Apart from the obvious – i.e. Democrat versus Republican—opinions were divided between those who thought the race was way too close to call and those who predicted with great confidence that Obama was far more likely to win. Most of the media—including the most respected outlets—continued with the traditional focus on the national polls. Even when state-level polls were cited, analyses often cherry-picked the more interesting polls or ones that suited the specific bias of the pundit. While on occasion this analysis has given one candidate or another an advantage of several points, more often than not they declared the race “neck-and-neck,” and well within any given poll’s margin of error. The other narrative was born out of a new, far more sophisticated political analysis than has ever been seen in the mass media before. Nate Silver, a young statistician who was part of the “Moneyball” revolution in professional baseball, has brought that same methodological rigor to political analysis. The result is that Silver is leading a second revolution: this time in the world of political punditry. In his blog, “Five Thirty-Eight,” (picked up this year by the New York Times), Silver put his first emphasis on the fact that whoever wins the national vote does not actually determine who wins the presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’S Campaign Against the Media on @Realdonaldtrump and Reactions to It on Twitter
    “FAKE NEWS!”: President Trump’s Campaign Against the Media on @realdonaldtrump and Reactions To It on Twitter A PEORIA Project White Paper Michael Cornfield GWU Graduate School of Political Management [email protected] April 10, 2019 This report was made possible by a generous grant from William Madway. SUMMARY: This white paper examines President Trump’s campaign to fan distrust of the news media (Fox News excepted) through his tweeting of the phrase “Fake News (Media).” The report identifies and illustrates eight delegitimation techniques found in the twenty-five most retweeted Trump tweets containing that phrase between January 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018. The report also looks at direct responses and public reactions to those tweets, as found respectively on the comment thread at @realdonaldtrump and in random samples (N = 2500) of US computer-based tweets containing the term on the days in that time period of his most retweeted “Fake News” tweets. Along with the high percentage of retweets built into this search, the sample exhibits techniques and patterns of response which are identified and illustrated. The main findings: ● The term “fake news” emerged in public usage in October 2016 to describe hoaxes, rumors, and false alarms, primarily in connection with the Trump-Clinton presidential contest and its electoral result. ● President-elect Trump adopted the term, intensified it into “Fake News,” and directed it at “Fake News Media” starting in December 2016-January 2017. 1 ● Subsequently, the term has been used on Twitter largely in relation to Trump tweets that deploy it. In other words, “Fake News” rarely appears on Twitter referring to something other than what Trump is tweeting about.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; WILLIAM SHINE, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief of Staff to the Case No. President of the United States; SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, in her official capacity as Press Secretary to the President of the United States; the UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; RANDOLPH D. ALLES, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Secret Service; and JOHN DOE, Secret Service Agent, Defendants. DECLARATION OF THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I, THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., hereby declare under penalty of perjury the following: 1. My name is Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. I am a partner with the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a member of the bar of this Court. I represent Plaintiffs Cable News Network, Inc. (“CNN”) and Abilio James Acosta (“Jim Acosta”) in the above-captioned action. By virtue of my direct involvement in this matter, I have personal knowledge of the content of this declaration, and I could and would competently testify to the truth of the matters stated herein. 2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an article by Brian Stelter of CNN entitled “Donald Trump: I won’t kick reporters out of White House press briefing room,” dated June 14, 2016, available at https://money.cnn.com/2016/06/14/media/donald-trump-press- credentials-access/index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, V
    Case 1:18-cv-02610-TJK Document 6-1 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and ABILIO JAMES ACOSTA, Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; WILLIAM SHINE, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Case No. 1:18-cv-02610-TJK of Staff to the President of the United States; SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, in her official capacity as Press Secretary to the President of the United States; the UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE; RANDOLPH ALLES, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Secret Service; and JOHN DOE, Secret Service Agent, in his official capacity, Defendants. BRIEF OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case 1:18-cv-02610-TJK Document 6-1 Filed 11/13/18 Page 2 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]