DOCSLIB.ORG

SPCB Paper 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPCB Paper 2005 SPCB(2009)Paper 8 21 January 2009 SPCB VISIT Background 1. Since its establishment in 1999 the Scottish Parliament has hosted many visits by the Speakers/Corporate Bodies and senior management of other parliaments from across the world. One of the main reasons for such visits has been the Parliament’s reputation for innovation and development, with visitors keen to examine our corporate structure, operations, management systems and the level of resourcing and services provided to MSPs. Over the course of the last 10 years the SPCB has not travelled to undertake any similar fact finding exercise and it is proposed that this would be an opportune time for such a visit to take place. 2. In conjunction with the External Liaison Unit, the SPCB secretariat has been looking into options for SPCB members to visit one or more similar legislatures to examine their corporate management systems and method of organisation in order to learn from best practise and compare them to the operations of the SPCB. Timing 3. It is envisaged that such a visit would take four to five days (depending on logistics) and it has been proposed that it could be carried out during the week of the 2009 February recess (16 – 20 February) so as to reduce the impact on parliamentary business. Discussion 4. Australia and Canada were both considered as examples of similar legislatures with good governance set ups. With 226 and 408 members respectively, both were considered good options from a corporate governance perspective. Both are forward thinking and have to deal with dual languages. However, there are a couple of obvious major disadvantages to both of these locations - both are bicameral and there is the issue of the time and cost of getting there which would be significantly greater than the other options available. 5. Following an initial examination by the External Liaison Unit of similar parliaments within Europe, three parliaments have been identified which the SPCB may wish to consider as part of this exercise. 6. The parliaments selected for consideration are the Norwegian Storting in Oslo; the Swedish Riksdag in Stockholm and the Landtag (state parliament) of the German state of Schleswig Holstein in Kiel. These parliaments have 1 been short listed as the most appropriate for consideration based on the following criteria: • the Norwegian, Swedish and German parliamentary systems were all considered as part of the original Consultative Steering Group (CSG) report on the establishment of the Scottish Parliament and elements of all three systems were drawn upon in the development of the blueprint for the Parliament. Much of this work went on to form the basis for Scotland’s Parliament (the white paper) and the Scotland Act 1998; • all three parliaments are in neighbouring northern European countries/regions which are relatively similar in population and composition to Scotland; • all three parliaments give a balanced mix of systems in terms of size, organisation and constitutional powers. All three are unicameral parliaments with a broadly similar corporate structure; however there are also significant differences between their systems and that of the Scottish Parliament which will offer alternatives for the Corporate Body to consider. 7. It is proposed that the SPCB could visit two of the three legislatures selected during a 4 day visit. 8. Attached at Annex A is a brief outline of each option. Resource Implications 9. Allocation has been made in the 2008-09 budget for such a trip. It is proposed that two officials would also accompany the members. Equalities Implications 10. There are no equality issues relating to this proposal. However, if the trip were to go ahead, equality issues relating to the accessibility of the Scottish Parliament may well be one of the areas members are able to discuss with their counterparts in the other legislatures. Publication Scheme 11. This paper will be published in line with the Parliament’s Publication Scheme. Recommendation 12. In view of the choices outlined, ELU recommends that a visit to the Norwegian Storting and Swedish Riksdag would be most beneficial for the SPCB to undertake. The similarities in the political system between Sweden and Scotland provides a common basis regarding political operations while 2 the difference with the Riksdag would provide the SPCB with the opportunity to compare its procedures with that of a larger staff organisation. 13. The Storting and Riksdag would also provide the opportunity for the SPCB to visit two parliaments which work very closely together, in an international sense, through bodies such as the Nordic Council. This may be beneficial to examine in more detail in terms of the Scottish Parliament’s organisational relationship with Westminster and the other devolved legislatures in the UK. 14. The International Office of the Storting has indicated that a visit during the week commencing 16 February could be accommodated with the delegation meeting with either the President or Vice President of the Storting, Members of the Presidium, the Secretary General and other parliament staff and with appropriate committees. In terms of the parliamentary programme it would be for the International Office at the Storting to draw up a suitable programme (in much the same way as ELU develops programmes for incoming political delegations to the Scottish Parliament). 15. The British Embassy in Oslo have also indicated that the Ambassador would like to meet with the SPCB should they choose to visit Oslo. 16. At the time of writing, ELU is awaiting confirmation from both the Swedish Riksdag and the Landtag of Schleswig-Holstein as to whether a one day visit by the SPCB could be accommodated during the week of 16 – 20 February. Decision 17. The SPCB is asked to agree: 17.1 whether it wishes to proceed with the proposed visit; 17.2 which legislatures it wishes to visit; and 17.3 which members would attend. SPCB secretariat January 2009 3 Annex A The Norwegian Storting 1. Norway has a population of 4.7 million people and an area of about 148,000sq miles. Like Scotland the vast majority of the population is concentrated in a small area of the country (the south and south central costal area) with remote centres of population scattered in west the north of the country. 2. The Storting, the national parliament of Norway, is a single chamber parliament comprising 169 directly elected members, elected for a fixed four year term. Members are elected by proportional representation system based on party lists. Seats are divided on a population basis amongst Norway’s 19 counties, (each county forms a multi-seat region, ranging from the most populated county, which elects 19 MPs, to the least populated which elects 4 MPs). As the next Norwegian general election will take place in September 2009 a visit to the Storting would afford the SPCB an opportunity to examine a neighbouring parliament in preparations for an election. 3. The Storting elects a President and Deputy President for its four year term. The President is both the organisational and symbolic head of the Storting. Despite being a single chamber parliament, the Storting currently divided itself into two separate chambers when considering primary legislation (similar to a committee of the whole house in the UK system). At the start of each four year session one quarter of the Members are selected, by lot, to form the Lagting (the upper chamber for legislation) the remaining three quarters form the Odelsting, (the lower chamber). Both the Lagting and Odelsting elect their own President and Deputy President separate from the President and Deputy President of the Storting. 4. In organisational terms the primary governing body of the Storting is the Presidium, which is chaired by the President and made up of the Deputy President plus the President and Deputy President of both the Odelsting and Lagting (6 elected members in total). These 6 posts are shared out amongst the main political parties proportionally based on the number of seats they hold in Parliament. The Presidium performs a role similar to both that of the SPCB and the Parliamentary Bureau in the Scottish Parliament in that it oversees the political business of the Storting as well as acting as the board to which the senior management reports on organisational/administrative issues. 5. The senior official of the Storting is the Secretary-General (similar to a Clerk/Chief Executive) who reports to the Presidium on the operations of the Storting. The Secretary-General is responsible for the Storting Administration, which has about 400 members of parliamentary staff and an operating budget for 2008 of £85 million, (£123 million including the budget for various Ombudsmen supported by the Storting). The Secretary-General is supported by the Office of the Secretary-General. 1 The Swedish Riksdag 6. Another potential parliament to visit is the Riksdag, the national parliament of Sweden. Much like Norway, Scotland and Sweden have similar demographic profiles in that most of the Swedish population are concentrated on a small area of the landmass, namely the south and south east coast. With a population of 9.2 million, Sweden has about twice the population of Scotland. 7. With 349 elected members, the Rikstag this is the largest of the three parliaments considered for a potential visit. Like the Storting, the Riksdag is elected once every four years on a proportional party list system (from 29 electoral regions). Elections take place on the third Sunday in September, every fourth year (the next election is due in September 2010). 8. The Speaker of the Riksdag is elected for a four year term and heads up the administration of the Riksdag. The administration is divided into five distinct departments, headed by a Secretary-General, who is also the Clerk of the Riksdag Chamber.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Synopsis of the Meeting Held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013
    BUREAU OF THE ASSEMBLY AS/Bur/CB (2013) 01 21 January 2013 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY Synopsis of the meeting held in Strasbourg on 21 January 2013 The Bureau of the Assembly, meeting on 21 January 2013 in Strasbourg, with Mr Jean-Claude Mignon, President of the Assembly, in the Chair, as regards: - First part-session of 2013 (Strasbourg, 21-25 January 2013): i. Requests for debates under urgent procedure and current affairs debates: . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold a debate under urgent procedure on “Migration and asylum: mounting tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Migration, Refugees and Displaced Persons for report; . decided to propose to the Assembly to hold the debate under urgent procedure on “Recent developments in Mali and Algeria and the threat to security and human rights in the Mediterranean region” on Thursday 24 January 2013 and to refer this item to the Committee on Political Affairs and Democracy for report; . decided not to hold a current affairs debate on “The deteriorating situation in Georgia”; . took note of the decision by the UEL Group to withdraw its request for a current affairs debate on “Political developments in Turkey regarding the human rights of the Kurds and other minorities”; ii. Draft agenda: updated the draft agenda; - Progress report of the Bureau of the Assembly and of the Standing Committee (5 October 2012 – 21 January 2013): (Rapporteur: Mr Kox, Netherlands, UEL): approved the Progress report; - Election observation: i. Presidential election in Armenia (18 February 2013): took note of the press release issued by the pre-electoral mission (Yerevan, 15-18 January 2013) and approved the final composition of the ad hoc committee to observe these elections (Appendix 1); ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe
    Spotlight on Parliaments in Europe Issued by the EP Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments N° 13 - November 2016 Quality of legislation stemming from the EU On 19 September 2016, the Italian Senate submitted a request to the ECPRD network concerning the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. This request was an opportunity for National Parliaments to exchange best practices on how to ensure the quality of legislation with specific regard to transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU law. From the 21 answers provided by National Parliaments it is clear that transposition and implementation of EU Law is highly unlikely to require special attention. While almost all of them are using legislative guidelines and procedures for guaranteeing high standard of general law-making, only a few have felt the need to establish special mechanisms to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures; the main way to ensure the quality of legislation stemming from the EU. The use of legislative guidelines and procedures appears to be the most common way for National Parliaments to ensure the quality of legislation, also the legislation stemming from the EU. It allows for good linguistic coherence in the national languages while enhancing the standardization of the law. For example, in the case of Austria, the Federal Chancellery has published specific “Legistische Richtlinien”. In Spain, the instrument used is the Regulation Guidelines adopted in the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of 22 July 2005. Both Italian Chambers use Joint Guidelines on drafting of national legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Parliamentary Elections, 1906-2013: Representation and Turnout Across Four Electoral Systems
    Norwegian Parliamentary Elections, 1906-2013: Representation and Turnout Across Four Electoral Systems Jon H. Fiva ∗ Daniel M. Smithy February 15, 2017 Abstract Since gaining full independence in 1905, Norway has experienced more than a cen- tury of democratic elections, and has reformed its electoral system three times, most notably with the switch from a two-round runoff system to proportional rep- resentation in 1919. This article introduces a new data set featuring all candidates running for parliamentary (Storting) elections from 1906 to 2013, and document patterns over time and across electoral systems in the development of the party sys- tem; candidates' gender, age, occupation, and geographic ties; and voter turnout. Scholars interested in using the data set can gain access to it through the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD). ∗BI Norwegian Business School. E-mail: jon.h.fi[email protected] yHarvard University, E-mail: [email protected] 1 Norway is one of the world's oldest and most stable democracies. Officially, the starting point of modern Norwegian democracy is May 17, 1814, when the Constitution was adopted. The Constitution of 1814 is the now the oldest codified constitution in Europe, and is second globally only to that of the United States (Narud and Strøm 2011). Although formally in a union with Sweden from 1814, Norway enjoyed over a hundred years of quasi-independent growth and political development before full independence was declared in 1905. The separation was peaceful, and subsequently approved by a national referendum. A second referendum in 1905 established Norway as a constitutional monarchy. The first electoral system used for the Norwegian Storting (parliament), introduced by the 1814 Constitution, was based on indirect elections with plurality rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Government Nordic and East Asian Perspectives
    Good Government Nordic and East Asian Perspectives Geir Helgesen and Uichol Kim in collaboration with Good_Govt.pm6 1 20/08/02, 10:16 First published in 2002 by NIAS Press Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Leifsgade 33, DK–2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark tel: (+45) 3254 8844 • fax: (+45) 3296 2530 E–mail: [email protected] • Website: http://www.niaspress.dk/ in collaboration with the Danish Institute of International Affairs (DUPI) Typesetting by NIAS Press Printed and bound in Denmark by Hertz bogtrykkergården a/s Cover design by Nanna Bild © Geir Helgesen and Uichol Kim 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this volume may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express permission of authors and publisher. The responsibility for facts and opinions expressed in this publication rests exclusively with the authors, and their interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. Publication of this book was made possible thanks to economic support from the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and the Danish Institute of International Affairs British Library Catalogue in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 87-91114-16-0 Good_Govt.pm6 2 20/08/02, 10:16 Contents Preface 5 The Research Network 6 Sponsors 6 East Asian Ideals: Harmony with Nature, Acknowledgementss 6 Self and Others 40 Introduction 7 Confucianism 41 Why is it important to understand East Asian societies 43 other societies? 7 Confucianism in modern East Asia 45 East Asia and the Nordic countries: Socialization
    [Show full text]
  • How Sweden Is Governed Content
    How Sweden is governed Content The Government and the Government Offices 3 The Prime Minister and the other ministers 3 The Swedish Government at work 3 The Government Offices at work 4 Activities of the Government Offices 4 Government agencies 7 The budget process 7 The legislative process 7 The Swedish social model 9 A democratic system with free elections 9 The Swedish administrative model – three levels 10 The Swedish Constitution 10 Human rights 11 Gender equality 11 Public access 12 Ombudsmen 12 Scrutiny of the State 13 Sweden in the world 14 Sweden and the EU 14 Sweden and the United Nations 14 Nordic cooperation 15 Facts about Sweden 16 Contact 16 2 HOW SWEDEN IS GOVERNED The Government and the Government Offices The Prime Minister and the other ministers After each election the Speaker of the Riksdag (the Swedish Parliament) submits a proposal for a new Prime Minister. The Prime Minister is subsequently appoin­ ted by the Riksdag and tasked with forming a government. The Government, led by the Prime Minister, governs Sweden. The Government consists of the Prime Minister and a number of ministers, each with their own area of responsibility. The Swedish Government at work The Government governs Sweden and is the driving force in the process by which laws are created and amended, thereby influencing the development of society as a whole. However, the Government is accountable to the Riksdag and must have its support to be able to implement its policies. The Government governs the country, which includes: • submitting legislative proposals to the Riksdag; • implementing decisions taken by the Riksdag; • exercising responsibility for the budget approved by the Riksdag; • representing Sweden in the EU; • entering into agreements with other states; • directing central government activities; • taking decisions in certain administrative matters not covered by other agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the President of the Osce Parliamentary Assembly
    REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE OSCE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Mr. George Tsereteli Winter Meeting of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly VIENNA, 20-21 February 2020 Report of the President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Dear colleagues and friends, Following my re-election as President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly during our Luxembourg Annual Session, I have continued to be active on your behalf to promote our work with leaders from our national parliaments and partner institutions, affirm our role within the OSCE family, and highlight some key priorities, in particular conflict resolution. I appreciate your strong support and the valuable assistance and advice provided by the Secretariat in both Copenhagen and Vienna. This has been crucial to provide parliamentary responses to a broad OSCE agenda and aim to meet our most pressing challenges. Detailed information on my work as President is listed in this report. In addition to these primary activities, I have met on several occasions with Heads of OSCE institutions to improve co-ordination at headquarters and in the field and ensure that our activities complement each other. I have also met with numerous PA delegations on the margins of my travels to ensure that all voices are heard and reflected in the work of our Parliamentary Assembly. Finally, together with a small group of Members, the Bureau and the International Secretariat, we have continued to hold regular discussions to consider changes in the Assembly’s work, in order to make it more effective and more visible. I want to thank those parliaments that have hosted my visits, but also particularly applaud and thank OSCE staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Liaison Subcommittee
    Parliamentary Liaison Subcommittee Parliamentary visit of the Legislative Council to Finland, Norway and Denmark from 14 to 21 September 2014 14 September 2014 (Sunday) AM Arrival at Finland 15 September 2014 (Monday) AM Visit to Pelimanni Primary School AM Tour of the Eduskunta Presentation of the Eduskunta's administration AM by the Administrative Director Visit to the Department for the Americas and PM Asia of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, Visit to Tekes, the Finnish Funding Agency for PM Innovation 16 September 2014 (Tuesday) Meeting with the Constitutional Law AM Committee of the Eduskunta Meeting with the Committee for the Future of AM the Eduskunta Meeting with the Vice-Speaker of the AM Eduskunta PM Observing Budget Plenary Session Lunch meeting with the Finland-Hong Kong PM Trade Association Evening Departure for Norway 17 September 2014 (Wednesday) Meetings with Members of Storting of AM different political parties Lunch meeting with representatives of the AM Ministry of Finance on Norwegian sovereign wealth fund Visit to the Parliamentary Ombudsman's Office PM including meeting with the Parliamentary Ombudsman PM Dinner with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 18 September 2014 (Thursday) Tour and introduction to the Storting and AM Norwegian politics by the Storting Secretariat Joint meeting with the Standing Committee on Local Government and Public Administration AM and the Standing Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs Meeting with the President of the Norwegian PM Storting 2 Meeting with academic of
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Mandate
    THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE STUDY THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE STUDY Marc Van der Hulst Inter-Parliamentary Union Geneva 2000 @ Inter-Parliamentary Union 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not be a way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold hired or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form or binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent publisher. ISBN 92-9142-056-5 Published by INTER-PARLIAMETARY UNION Headquarters Liaison Office with the United Nations Place du Petit-Saconnex 821 United Nations Plaza C.P. 438 9th Floor 1211 Geneva 19 New York, N.Y. 10017 Switzerland United States of America Layout, printing and binding by Atar, Geneva Cover design by Aloys Robellaz, Les Studios Lolos, Carouge, Switzerland (Translated from the French by Jennifer Lorenzi and Patricia Deane) t Table of Contents FOREWORD ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi INTRODUCTION l PART ONE: NATURE AND DURATION OF THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE I. NATURE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE 6 1. The traditional opposition between national sovereignty and popular sovereignty 6 2. The free representational mandate 8 3. The imperative mandate 9 4. A choice motivated by pragmatic rather than ideological considerations? 10 II. DURATION OF THE PARLIAMENTARY MANDATE..
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: an Overview of Swedish Constitutional History
    Perfecting Parliament Succession, and the Riksdag Acts). It is this portion--the written constitution--that defines the electoral system, specifies the organization of parliament, the relation of the king to parliament, and characterizes many of the constraints that define the limits of governmental activities. These written rules directly shape the broad outlines of Swedish governance, and most clearly characterize the general manner in which the preferences of Swedish citizens are used to determine which specific public policies are put in place. It bears noting, this usage of the term constitution differs somewhat from that used by some Swedish scholars. The term constitution, as used here, refers to the fundamental procedures and constraints faced by Swedish government, rather then the subset of relevant legal documents which claim constitutional status, per se. By the usage adopted here, the Swedish state may be said to have operated under four different constitutions: one written in 1809, one that emerged from amendment in 1866, one that emerged from amendment and additional structural and electoral reform in 1920, and one that was adopted by major structural reforms in 1970. That is to say, the result of major reforms of fundamental procedures and constraints is regarded as creating a new constitution. (There were only two Instruments of Government during the period of interest, those of 1809 and 1975, but there have been four substantially different procedures for making new laws.) This convention is faithful to the discussion above, and simplifies the description of major reforms. The result of the major reforms of the Riksdag adopted in 1866 and in 1909-20 period will be referred to as the Constitution of 1866 and Constitution of 1920, rather than some less descriptive and more cumbersome phrase.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network 1-2 October 2020 List of Participants
    as of 02/10/2020 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network 1-2 October 2020 List of participants MP or Chamber or Political Party Country Parliamentary First Name Last Name Organisation Job Title Biography (MPs only) Official represented Pr. Ammar Moussi was elected as Member of the Algerian Parliament (APN) for the period 2002-2007. Again, in the year Algerian Parliament and Member of Peace Society 2017 he was elected for the second term and he's now a member of the Finance and Budget commission of the National Algeria Moussi Ammar Parliamentary Assembly Member of Parliament Parliament Movement. MSP Assembly. In addition, he's member of the parliamentary assembly of the Mediterranean PAM and member of the executif of the Mediterranean bureau of tha Arab Renewable Energy Commission AREC. Abdelmajid Dennouni is a Member of Parliament of the National People’s Assembly and a Member of finances and Budget Assemblée populaire Committee, and Vice president of parliamentary assembly of the Mediterranean. He was previously a teacher at Oran Member of nationale and Algeria Abdelmajid Dennouni Member of Parliament University, General Manager of a company and Member of the Council of Competitiveness, as well as Head of the Parliament Parliamentary Assembly organisaon of constucng, public works and hydraulics. of the Mediterranean Member of Assemblée Populaire Algeria Amel Deroua Member of Parliament WPL Ambassador for Algeria Parliament Nationale Assemblée Populaire Algeria Parliamentary official Safia Bousnane Administrator nationale Lucila Crexell is a National Senator of Argentina and was elected by the people of the province of Neuquén in 2013 and reelected in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP RS NARS and Indepen
    The National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia Serbia AND INDEPENDENT BODIES SERBIA THE REPUBLIC OF OF ASSEMBLY NATIONAL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES 253 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES Materials from the Conference ”National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia and Independent Bodies” Belgrade, 26-27 November 2009 and an Overview of the Examples of International Practice Olivera PURIĆ UNDP Deputy Resident Representative a.i. Edited by Boris ČAMERNIK, Jelena MANIĆ and Biljana LEDENIČAN The following have participated: Velibor POPOVIĆ, Maja ŠTERNIĆ, Jelena MACURA MARINKOVIĆ Translated by: Novica PETROVIĆ Isidora VLASAK English text revised by: Charles ROBERTSON Design and layout Branislav STANKOVIĆ Copy editing Jasmina SELMANOVIĆ Printing Stylos, Novi Sad Number of copies 150 in English language and 350 in Serbian language For the publisher United Nations Development Programme, Country Office Serbia Internacionalnih brigada 69, 11000 Beograd, +381 11 2040400, www.undp.org.rs ISBN – 978-86-7728-125-0 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme. Acknowledgement We would like to thank all those whose hard work has made this publication possible. We are particularly grateful for the guidance and support of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, above all from the Cabinet of the Speaker and the Secretariat. A special debt of gratitude is owed to the representatives of the independent regulatory bodies; the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, the State Audit Institution, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Serbia and the Anti-corruption Agency.
    [Show full text]