DOCSLIB.ORG

Glasgow Coma Scale for Field Triage of Trauma: a Systematic Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Glasgow Coma Scale for Field Triage of Trauma: a Systematic Review Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 182 Glasgow Coma Scale for Field Triage of Trauma: A Systematic Review e Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 182 Glasgow Coma Scale for Field Triage of Trauma: A Systematic Review Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I Prepared by: Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center Portland, OR Investigators: Roger Chou, M.D. Annette M. Totten, Ph.D. Miranda Pappas, M.A. Nancy Carney, Ph.D. Spencer Dandy, B.S. Sara Grusing, B.A. Rongwei Fu, Ph.D. Ngoc Wasson, M.P.H. Craig Newgard, M.D., M.P.H., FACEP AHRQ Publication No. 16(17)-EHC041-EF January 2017 This report is based on research conducted by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report. The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients. This report is made available to the public under the terms of a licensing agreement between the author and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. This report may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the report. Further reproduction of those copyrighted materials is prohibited without the express permission of copyright holders. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of any derivative products that may be developed from this report, such as clinical practice guidelines, other quality enhancement tools, or reimbursement or coverage policies, may not be stated or implied. This report may periodically be assessed for the currency of conclusions. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program Web site at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. Search on the title of the report. Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact [email protected]. Suggested citation: Chou R, Totten AM, Pappas M, Carney N, Dandy S, Grusing S, Fu R, Wasson N, Newgard C. Glasgow Coma Scale for Field Triage of Trauma: A Systematic Review. Comparative Effectiveness Review No.182. (Prepared by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I.) AHRQ Publication No.16(17)-EHC041- EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; January 2017. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. ii Preface The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of evidence reports and technology assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) requested and provided funding for this report. The reports and assessments provide organizations with comprehensive, evidence-based information on common medical conditions and new health care technologies and strategies. They also identify research gaps in the selected scientific area, identify methodological and scientific weaknesses, suggest research needs, and move the field forward through an unbiased, evidence-based assessment of the available literature. The EPCs systematically review the relevant scientific literature on topics assigned to them by AHRQ and conduct additional analyses when appropriate prior to developing their reports and assessments. To bring the broadest range of experts into the development of evidence reports and health technology assessments, AHRQ encourages the EPCs to form partnerships and enter into collaborations with other medical and research organizations. The EPCs work with these partner organizations to ensure that the evidence reports and technology assessments they produce will become building blocks for health care quality improvement projects throughout the Nation. The reports undergo peer review and public comment prior to their release as a final report. AHRQ expects that the EPC evidence reports and technology assessments, when appropriate, will inform individual health plans, providers, and purchasers as well as the health care system as a whole by providing important information to help improve health care quality. If you have comments on this evidence report, they may be sent by mail to the Task Order Officer named below at: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, or by email to [email protected]. Andrew Bindman, M.D. Arlene S. Bierman, M.D., M.S. Director Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Stephanie Chang, M.D., M.P.H. David W. Niebuhr, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc. Director Task Order Officer Evidence-based Practice Center Program Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Cathy Gotschall, Sc.D. Senior Health Scientist National Highway Traffic Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation iii Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge Andrew Hamilton, M.L.S., M.S., for conducting literature searches, and Leah Williams, B.S., for providing editorial assistance. Both are located at the Oregon Health & Science University. Technical Expert Panel In designing the study questions and methodology at the outset of this report, the EPC consulted several technical and content experts. Broad expertise and perspectives were sought. Divergent and conflicted opinions are common and perceived as healthy scientific discourse that results in a thoughtful, relevant systematic review. Therefore, in the end, study questions, design, methodologic approaches, and/or conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of individual technical and content experts. Technical Experts must disclose any financial conflicts of interest greater than $10,000 and any other relevant business or professional conflicts of interest. Because of their unique clinical or content expertise, individuals with potential conflicts may be retained. The TOO and the EPC work to balance, manage, or mitigate any potential conflicts of interest identified. The list of Technical Experts who provided input to this report follows: Eileen Metzger Bulger, M.D., FACS* E. Brooke Lerner, Ph.D.* Professor Professor With Tenure Department of Surgery Departments of Emergency Medicine and University of Washington Pediatrics Chief of Trauma, Harborview Medical Care Medical College of Wisconsin Seattle, WA Milwaukee, WI Steven M. Green, M.D., FACEP* N. Clay Mann, Ph.D., M.S.* Professor Professor Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics Department of Pediatrics Loma Linda University Medical Center and University of Utah School of Medicine Children’s Hospital Salt Lake City, UT Loma Linda, CA P. Daniel Patterson, Ph.D., M.P.H., M.S., Julie C. Leonard, M.D., M.P.H.* N.R.P.* Associate Professor Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Pediatrics Department of Emergency Medicine Division of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh The Ohio State University College of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA Columbus, OH iv Scott M. Sasser, M.D.* David W. Wright, M.D., FACEP Professor Associate Professor With Tenure Department of Emergency Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine University of South Carolina School of Emory University Medicine Atlanta, GA Columbia, SC *Provided input on Draft Report Peer Reviewers Prior to publication of the final evidence report, the EPC sought input from independent Peer Reviewers without financial conflicts of interest. However, the conclusions and synthesis of the scientific literature presented in this report do not necessarily represent the views of individual reviewers. Peer Reviewers must disclose any financial conflicts of interest greater than $10,000 and any other relevant business or professional conflicts of interest. Because of their unique clinical or content expertise, individuals with potential nonfinancial conflicts may be retained. The TOO and the EPC work to balance, manage, or mitigate any potential nonfinancial conflicts of interest identified. The list of Peer Reviewers follows: Blair Bigham, M.D., M.Sc., ACP Mark Gestring, M.D., FACS Paramedic and EMS Researcher
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Surgical Management of Parkinson's Disease
    SEMINAR PAPER DTM Chan Surgical management of Parkinson’s VCT Mok WS Poon disease: a critical review KN Hung XL Zhu ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ !"#$%&'()*+, Parkinson’s disease is a progressive disabling movement disorder that is characterised by three cardinal symptoms: resting tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. Before the availability of effective medical treatment with levodopa and stereotactic neurosurgery, the objective of surgical management was to alleviate symptoms such as tremor at the expense of motor deficits. Levodopa was the first effective medical treatment for Parkinson’s disease, and surgical treatment such as stereotactic thalamo- tomy became obsolete. After one decade of levodopa therapy, however, drug-induced dyskinesia had become a source of additional disability not amenable to medical treatment. Renewed interest in stereotactic functional neurosurgery to manage Parkinson’s disease has been seen since the 1980s. Local experience of deep-brain stimulation is presented and discussed in this paper. Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson’s disease, although evidence from randomised control trials is lacking. !"#$%&'()*+,-!./01$23456789:; Key words: !"#$%&'()*+,-./01'23456789:;< Electric stimulation; !"#$%&'()*+,-./01(23#45+6789: Globus pallidus/surgery; Parkinson disease; !"#$%&'()*+,-./012345678'9:;< Stereotactic techniques; !"#$%&'()*%+,-./0123)456789:; Subthalamic nuclei/surgery; !"#$%&'()*+,-.1980 !"#$%&'()* Thalamus/surgery !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=
    [Show full text]
  • Decompressive Craniectomy Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with an Initial Glasgow Coma Scale Score of 3 Or 4
    Case Report Clinics in Surgery Published: 03 Jul, 2019 Decompressive Craniectomy Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with an Initial Glasgow Coma Scale Score of 3 or 4 Afif AFIF* Department of Neurosurgery and Anatomy, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, France Abstract Background: Decompressive craniectomy is a surgical management option for severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). However, few studies have followed patients with TBI who have a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 or 4 (out of 15). Decompressive craniectomy has been avoided in such patients owing to poor outcomes and poor functional recoveries in previous cases of treatment using this method. Clinical Presentation: Two patients are presented in our case series. The first suffered severe TBI following an aggression, with a GCS score of 3 and bilaterally dilated unreactive pupils. Brains CT scan showed right frontal fracture, bifrontal hematoma contusion, a fronto-temporo-parietal acute Subdural Hematoma (SDH) with a thickness of 14 mm on the right side, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, with 20 mm of midline shift to the left side, and diffuses brain edema. The second presented with severe TBI following an automobile accident, with a GCS score of 4 and iso- reactive pupils. A brain CT scan showed bilateral fronto-temporal fracture, diffuse brain hematoma contusion, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, right Extradural Hematoma (EDH) and bilateral fronto-temporo-parietal acute SDH that was more pronounced on the right side. Conclusion: Follow-up after the operations showed an Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (EGOS) score of 8 and a very good functional recovery for both patients. Our case series suggests that in patients with severe TBI and a GCS score of 3 or 4; decompressive craniectomy can be performed OPEN ACCESS with good long-term neurological outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Awake Craniotomy for Left Insular Low-Grade Glioma Removal on a Patient with Learning Disabilities
    THIEME Techniques in Neurosurgery 41 Awake Craniotomy for Left Insular Low-Grade Glioma Removal on a Patient with Learning Disabilities Andrej Vranic1 Blaz Koritnik2 Jasmina Markovic-Bozic3 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Fondation Ophtalmologique A. de Address for correspondence Andrej Vranic, MD, PhD, Department of Rothschild, Paris, France Neurosurgery, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 2 Department of Neurophysiology, University Medical Centre, 29, Rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France (e-mail: [email protected]). Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia Indian J Neurosurg 2017;6:41–43. Abstract Introduction Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are slow-growing primary brain tumors in adults, with high tropism for eloquent areas. Standard approach in treatment of LGG is awake craniotomy with intraoperative cortical mapping — a method which is usually used on adult and fully cooperative patients. Case Report We present the case of a patient with learning disabilities (PLD) who Keywords was operated for left insular LGG awake craniotomy, and intraoperative cortical ► low-grade glioma mapping were performed and the tumor was gross totally removed. ► awake craniotomy Conclusion Awake surgery for left insular LGG removal is challenging; however, it ► learning disability can be performed safely and successfully on PLD. Introduction been shown that awake brain tumor surgery can be safely performed with extremely low complication and failure rates Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are slow-growing primary brain regardless of American Society of Anesthesiologists tumors in adults. For many decades, these tumors were classification, body mass index, smoking status, psychiatric or considered inoperable because of their high tropism for emotional history, seizure frequency and duration, tumor site, eloquent areas and white matter pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow Coma Scale
    CalculatedPOWERED BY Decisions Clinical Decision Support for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice Subscribers Glasgow Coma Scale Introduction: The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) estimates coma severity based on eye, verbal, and motor criteria. Click the thumbnail above to access the calculator. Points & Pearls • The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) allows provid- agreement between providers, training and ers in multiple settings and with varying levels education are available online from the GCS of training to communicate succinctly about a creators at www.glasgowcomascale.org. patient’s mental status. • Simpler scores that have been shown to per- • The GCS has been shown to have statistical form as well as the GCS in the prehospital and correlation with a broad array of adverse neuro- emergency department setting (for initial evalu- logic outcomes, including brain injury, need for ation); these are often contracted versions of the neurosurgery, and mortality. GCS itself. For example, the Simplified Motor • The GCS score has been incorporated into Score (SMS) uses the motor portion of the GCS numerous guidelines and assessment scores only. THE SMS and other contracted scores are (eg, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Advanced less well studied than the GCS for outcomes Trauma Life Support, Acute Physiology and like long-term mortality, and the GCS has been Chronic Health Evaluation I-III, the Trauma and studied as trended over time, while the SMS has Injury Severity Score, and the World Federation not. of Neurologic Surgeons Subarachnoid Hemor- rhage Grading Scale) Critical Actions Although it has been adopted widely and in a Points to keep in mind: variety of settings, the GCS score is not intended • Correlation with outcome and severity is most for quantitative use.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score
    CalculatedPOWERED BY Decisions Clinical Decision Support for Emergency Medicine Practice Subscribers Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score Introduction: The SOFA score predicts mortality risk for patients in the intensive care unit based on lab results and clinical data. Click the thumbnail above to access the calculator. Points & Pearls • The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment namically or to determine the success or failure of (SOFA) is a mortality prediction score that is an intervention in the ICU. based on the degree of dysfunction of 6 organ systems. • The score is calculated at admission and every Why to Use 24 hours until discharge, using the worst param- The SOFA score can be used to determine the eters measured during the prior 24 hours. level of organ dysfunction and mortality risk in • The scores can be used in several ways, including: ICU patients. » As individual scores for each organ to deter- mine the progression of organ dysfunction. » As a sum of scores on a single intensive care When to Use unit (ICU) day. • The SOFA can be used on all patients who » As a sum of the worst scores during the ICU are admitted to an ICU. stay. • It is not clear whether the SOFA is reliable for • The SOFA score stratifies mortality risk in ICU patients who were transferred from another patients without restricting the data used to ICU. admission values. Critical Actions Instructions Clinical prediction scores such as the SOFA and the Calculate the SOFA score using the worst value Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health for each variable in the preceding 24-hour Evaluation (APACHE II) can be measured on all period.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurocognitive and Psychosocial Correlates of Ventroposterolateral Pallidotomy Surgery in Parkinson's Disease
    Neurocognitive and psychosocial correlates of ventroposterolateral pallidotomy surgery in Parkinson's disease Henry J. Riordan, Ph.D., Laura A. Flashman, Ph.D., and David W. Roberts, M.D. Department of Psychiatry and Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth­Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire The purpose of this study was to characterize the neuropsychological and psychosocial profile of patients with Parkinson's disease before and after they underwent unilateral left or right pallidotomy, to assess specific cognitive and personality changes caused by lesioning the globus pallidus, and to predict favorable surgical outcome based on these measures. Eighteen patients underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessment before and after left-sided pallidotomy (10 patients) or right-sided pallidotomy (eight patients). The findings support the presence of frontosubcortical cognitive dysfunction in all patients at baseline and a specific pattern of cognitive impairment following surgery, with side of lesion being an important predictor of pattern and degree of decline. Specifically, patients who underwent left-sided pallidotomy experienced a mild decline on measures of verbal learning and memory, phonemic and semantic verbal fluency, and cognitive flexibility. Patients who underwent right-sided pallidotomy exhibited a similar decline in verbal learning and cognitive flexibility, as well as a decline in visuospatial construction abilities; however, this group also exhibited enhanced performance on a delayed facial memory measure. Lesioning the globus pallidus may interfere with larger cognitive circuits needed for processing executive information with disruption of the dominant hemisphere circuit, resulting in greater deficits in verbal information processing. The left-sided pallidotomy group also reported fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety following surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurosurgery
    KALEIDA HEALTH Name ____________________________________ Date _____________ DELINEATION OF PRIVILEGES - NEUROSURGERY All members of the Department of Neurosurgery at Kaleida Health must have the following credentials: 1. Successful completion of an ACGME accredited Residency, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, or an ACGME equivalent Neurosurgery Residency Program. 2. Members of the clinical service of Neurosurgery must, within five (5) years of appointment to staff, achieve board certification in Neurosurgery. *Maintenance of board certification is mandatory for all providers who have achieved this status* Level 1 (core) privileges are those able to be performed after successful completion of an accredited Neurosurgery Residency program. The removal or restriction of these privileges would require further investigation as to the individual’s overall ability to practice, but there is no need to delineate these privileges individually. PLEASE NOTE: Please check the box for each privilege requested. Do not use an arrow or line to make selections. We will return applications that ignore this directive. LEVEL I (CORE) PRIVILEGES Basic Procedures including: Admission and Follow-Up Repair cranial or dural defect or lesion History and Physical for diagnosis and treatment plan* Seizure Chest tube placement Sterotactic framed localization of lesion Debride wound Sterotactic frameless localization Endotracheal intubation Transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary lesion Excision of foreign body Trauma Insertion of percutaneous arterial
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocephalus and Shunts
    Hydrocephalus and Shunts Information for patients 2 What is hydrocephalus? The brain is surrounded by fluid, called CSF - Cerebrospinal fluid. The CSF provides some protection for the brain. The brain makes CSF in special fluid-filled spaces called ventricles. The ventricles link to each other by a system of channels through which the CSF flows and eventually leaves to surround the whole brain and spinal cord. The CSF is then taken back into the blood-stream by special channels beside the major veins on the inside of the skull. These are called arachnoid granulations. Figure 1 - Diagram of the brain showing normal CSF pathways 3 Hydrocephalus is a condition in which the CSF builds up within the brain. There are a number of causes of this: 1. The fluid pathways may be blocked or narrowed so that fluid cannot flow adequately. The causes of this blockage can include scarring, a variation in the development of the fluid pathways (present from birth) or sometimes by a tumour which blocks the CSF flow. 2. Sometimes the fluid collection channels (arachnoid granulations) can become blocked and stop working - in a similar manner to how leaves can block a drain. This can happen following an infection or a bleed (haemorrhage). As a result of this block in fluid flow, CSF builds up inside the brain, resulting in an increase in pressure. As a result of this patients most commonly report symptoms of headaches, nausea and vomiting, but problems with balance and short term memory have also been reported. There is another group of patients who do not fit into the patterns described above.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Pressure Headache, Intracranial Hypotension Last Updated: May 8, 2019 ETIOPATHOPHYSIOLOGY
    INTRACRANIAL HYPOTENSION S58 (1) Low Pressure Headache, Intracranial Hypotension Last updated: May 8, 2019 ETIOPATHOPHYSIOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 1 CLINICAL FEATURES ............................................................................................................................... 1 DIAGNOSIS................................................................................................................................................ 2 TREATMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 2 ETIOPATHOPHYSIOLOGY Causes of CSF hypotension: 1. Lumbar puncture (CSF leakage through dural puncture site) - most common cause. 2. Dural tear or avulsion of nerve root (head or back trauma, craniotomy, spinal surgery, spontaneous dural tears, pituitary tumor*). *can cause CSF rhinorrhea craniotomy and trauma also decrease CSF formation. 3. CSF shunts 4. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a) CSF hyperabsorption (no evidence of CSF leak) - radionuclide cisternogram shows rapid transport of isotope and rapid uptake in kidneys and bladder. b) decreased CSF production - radionuclide cisternogram shows slow isotope flow; leads to brain sagging with compression of pituitary-hypothalamic axis and further reduction in CSF production. c) TARLOV cysts - arachnoid perineural cyst found in proximal radicles of lower spinal cord; rupture of cysts can
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality for the Assessment of Technical Skills in Neurosurgery
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS Neurosurg Focus 51 (2):E15, 2021 A systematic review of virtual reality for the assessment of technical skills in neurosurgery *Justin Chan, BS,1 Dhiraj J. Pangal, BS,1 Tyler Cardinal, BS,1 Guillaume Kugener, MEng,1 Yichao Zhu, MS,1 Arman Roshannai,1 Nicholas Markarian, BS,1 Aditya Sinha, BS,1 Anima Anandkumar, PhD,2 Andrew Hung, MD,3 Gabriel Zada, MD, MS,1 and Daniel A. Donoho, MD4 1USC Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; 2Computing + Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; 3USC Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and 4Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas OBJECTIVE Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) systems are increasingly available to neurosurgeons. These systems may provide opportunities for technical rehearsal and assessments of surgeon performance. The assessment of neurosurgeon skill in VR and AR environments and the validity of VR and AR feedback has not been systematically reviewed. METHODS A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted through MEDLINE and PubMed. Studies published in English between January 1990 and February 2021 describing the use of VR or AR to quantify surgical technical performance of neurosurgeons without the use of human raters were included. The types and categories of automated performance metrics (APMs) from each of these studies were recorded. RESULTS Thirty-three VR studies were included in the review; no AR studies met inclusion criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • CSW Dysnatremia Pathway
    Dysnatremia v2.2: Table of Contents Approval & Citation Summary of Version Changes Explanation of Evidence Ratings Patients At Risk for High or Low Sodium Postop Neurosurgery At Risk for Hyponatremia Periop Neurosurgery At Risk for Diabetes Insipidus Postop Neurosurgery At Risk for Diabetes Insipidus Patients with Diabetes Insipidus Periop Known Diabetes Insipidus ED or Acute Care Known Diabetes Insipidus Background How Dysnatremia Occurs For questions concerning this pathway, Last Updated: May 2021 contact: [email protected] Next Expected Review: October 2023 © 2021 Seattle Children’s Hospital, all rights reserved, Medical Disclaimer Dysnatremia v2.2: Postop Neurosurgery At Risk for Hyponatremia Approval & Citation Summary of Version Changes Explanation of Evidence Ratings Return to Table of Contents Monitoring Procedures at High Risk Orders for Low Sodium • Serum sodium and serum osmolality qam x 3 days Inclusion Criteria • Daily weight • Craniotomy • Patients with procedure • Strict intake and output • Craniosynostosis repair/ at high risk for low • If no void over 8 hours, bladder scan or ask patient to cranial vault expansion/frontal sodium void orbital advancement Call Contact Provider for • Hemispherectomy/lobectomy Exclusion Criteria • Placement of Grid and strip • Sodium <135 • Age <1 year • Tumor resection/biopsy • Endoscopic 3rd ventriculostomy • Intake and output positive > 40 ml/kg over 8 hours (ETV) • Insertion of lumbar drain • Urine output <0.5 ml/kg/hr or no void over 8 hours • Laser ablation • Subgaleal
    [Show full text]
  • Trauma Measure #5 Documentation of Glasgow Coma Score at Time of Initial Evaluation in TBI
    Trauma Measure #5 Documentation of Glasgow Coma Score at Time of Initial Evaluation in TBI National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination Measure Type (Process/Outcome): Process 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY DESCRIPTION: Percentage of trauma activations for patients aged 18 years or older evaluated as part of a trauma activation or trauma consultation who have a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial head CT for which a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at the time of initial evaluation is documented in the medical record within 1 hour of hospital arrival. INSTRUCTIONS: This measure is to be reported each time a patient is evaluated as part of a trauma activation or trauma consultation and is found to have a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial head CT. It is anticipated that clinicians who are responsible for the initial trauma evaluation of TBI patients as specified in the denominator coding will submit this measure. Measure Reporting via Registry: Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) codes, patient demographics, and the medical record are used to identify patients who are included in the measure’s denominator. The listed numerator options are used to report the numerator of the measure. DENOMINATOR: All patients aged 18 years or older evaluated by an eligible professional as part of a trauma activation or trauma consultation who have a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on initial head CT). Denominator Criteria: Patients aged 18 years or older AND Patients evaluated as part of a trauma activation
    [Show full text]