Spring 2020 Sego Lily Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spring 2020 Sego Lily Newsletter Sego Lily Spring 43(2) Spring 2020 Volume 43 Number 2 Dandelion Relatives ..................... 2 Salt Lake Chapter Report ........... 5 Cyperus michelianus ................... 6 2020 Rare Plant Meeting ......... 12 Glyptopleura marginata Alice Eastwood ............................. 15 Utah Native Plant Society Some Special Dandelion Relatives by William Gray bracts known as an involucre. Individual flowers are of two main kinds, disk and ray. As far as corollas are Ninety-nine percent of all members of the huge concerned each disk flower has 4 or 5 petals fused into a composite family (Asteraceae) are assigned to four main lobed tube; in ray flowers the tube fails to close along subfamilies, and most North American species to just one side and is flattened out to make what looks like a three of those. Broadly speaking these are the aster-like single large petal, more correctly known as a ligule. The (Asteroideae) thistlelike (Carduoideae) and dandelion- small lobes may be more or less visible as separate or chicory-like (Cichorioideae) plants. A couple of years teeth. ago I wrote a short article for Sego Lily about the renaming of 'our' Asters and now it's time for a little Plants of the Aster subfamily usually have both ray and about some of our chicory-related plants. This time the disk flowers, those of the Thistle subfamily have only focus is more an introduction to a group of less-familiar disk flowers, and those of the Chicory subfamily have plants than to taxonomy. only ray flowers in one or several series. In the Microseris subtribe which is our focus here the ligules The subfamily is most diversified in the Eastern can be large and showy with very obvious teeth. hemisphere: dandelion, chicory, salsify and lettuce are Oftentimes only the inner flowers are fertile while the familiar examples brought over from Europe as a source outer ones serve to attract pollinators rather than of salad greens and edible roots. They are all part of the reward them. chicory 'tribe' Cichoriae. However, the western US has many fine native examples of its own, which may carry What about the calyx? Many families have soft green names such as Desert Chicory, Desert Dandelion or sepals but in composites the calyx develops instead into Mountain Dandelion. I don't know of them being used as all sorts of little appendages that function as dispersal food, but some of their flowers are outstanding. agents. Thistle-down and the fluffy parachutes of dandelions are familiar examples. Bristles, scales and A typical attribute of this group is that flower heads awns are also common. 'Pappus' is used to describe this contain only ray flowers. These develop into seed heads modified calyx structure in all its forms. Seeds are dry which can be spectacular aggregates of intricate little achenes to which the pappus is attached. parachutes. Leaves are mostly or entirely basal with juice that is usually milky and somewhat bitter. Another Figure 1a shows a flowering head of Microseris nutans characteristic, though not universal, is that they tend to while 1b shows a head of Microseris (Uropappus) lindleyi flower early in the morning and be closed by early that has gone to seed; 1c is a close-up of achenes with a afternoon. pappus of flattened shiny bristles, each with a slender awn. Sometimes the seeds with pappus are beautiful in At a recent meeting of the Salt Lake Chapter of UNPS their own right. Steve Hegji asked us to send in a few photos that showed especially interesting or beautiful native plants. Microseris Subtribe About 20 genera are recognized, One I submitted aroused a lot of interest because of its many of them occurring in the southwestern US. Two striking appearance – and also because most in the thirds of the genera are small with 5 or fewer species. audience had never seen, or even heard of it. Some are real desert plants with but a limited distribution in Utah – and they can be strikingly Chicory itself is familiar as a tall straggly plant with handsome! pretty blue flowers, common as a roadside weed. Its non-fluffy seeds are rarely even noticed. Close relatives Remarkably, almost all species of this subtribe found in in the Southwest form a small 'subtribe' named after a the whole Intermountain Region also occur in Utah, with genus of rather inconspicuous plants including our a concentration in the south and west parts of the state. Nodding Silverpuffs, Microseris nutans. I'll use the term Table 1 lists genera in the arrangement given by the Microseris subtribe instead of Microseridinae. European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT). Their website is backed by a consortium of very up-to- Asteraceae Flowers. Recall that in the composite family date researchers, and Wikipedia is a great source for as a whole what seems like one large flower is actually a their current views on classification, with easy-to- head of smaller flowers, surrounded by a cluster of navigate phylogenetic trees. Cover photo by William Gray also appears uncropped on page 5. 2 Sego Lily Spring 43(2) Genus Common Names Species Intermountaina Agoseris Mountain Dandelion 14 5 (5) Microseris Silverpuffs 44 1 (1) Nothocalais Silverpuffs 4 1 (1) Uropappus Silverpuffs 3 1 (1) Chaetadelpha Skeletonweed 1 1 (0) Lygodesmia Skeleton Plant 9 2 (2) Malacothrix Desert Dandelion 20 5 (5) Atrichoseris Parachute Plant 1 1 (1) Stephanomeria Wire Lettuce 19 7 (5) Rafinesquia Desert Chicory 2 2 (2) Pleiacanthus Thorny Skeletonweed 1 1 (1) Prenanthella Brightwhite 1 1 (1) Glyptopleura Crustleaf 2 2 (2) Table 1 Microseris subtribe in the Intermountain Region. This treatment is based on that of the European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT), accessed via Wikipedia ™ 3/13/2020. aNumber of species treated in Intermountain Flora with those recognized in A Utah Flora in parentheses; taxon names are from EDIT. Flora of North America (FNA) and other authorities plants of drier to moist sites in the mountains and separate two more monospecific genera (Anisocoma and foothills, rather than harsh deserts. Leaves are mostly Calycoseris) from Malacothrix, both of which are native basal while flower heads have a long narrow involucre. to the Intermountain Region. A brief description of A. aurantiaca is illustrated. It is sometimes quite pinkish several genera follows, with a portrait gallery in at high elevations. Figure 2. Microseris This is the genus after which the subtribe is Agoseris Our most commonly encountered members of named, also the largest and most widespread. the group are Pale Mountain Dandelion (A. glauca) and Uropappus and Nothocalais were separated from Orange Mountain Dandelion (A. aurantiaca). These are Microseris as a result of modern research. a b c Figure 1 Characteristic features of the Microseris subtribe. a Nodding Silverpuffs, Microseris nutans, flower head showing ligules with 5 teeth, Salt Lake Co., Utah; b, c Silverpuffs, Microseris (Uropappus) lindleyi seed head and close-up of achene with pappus, Cochise Co., Arizona. 3 Utah Native Plant Society a b c d e f g Figure 2 A portrait gallery of the Microseris subtribe. a Orange Dandelion, Agoseris aurantiaca Salt Lake Co., Utah; b Smooth Desert Dandelion, Malacothrix glabrata, Kane Co., Utah; c Antelope Island Skeleton Plant, Lygodesmia grandiflora var. dianthopsis, Salt Lake Co., Utah; d Showy Rushpink, Lygodesmia grandiflora var. grandiflora, Emery Co., UT; e Scale-bud, Anisocoma (Malacothrix) acaulis, Mono Co., California; f Desert Chicory, Rafinesquia neomexicana, Inyo Co., California; g Parachute Plant, Atrichoseris platyphylla, Inyo Co., California. Lygodesmia Thin stems give rise to the name inconspicuous stems. Basal leaf clusters are very robust, Skeletonweed. Authorities differ as to how many species however. should be recognized. Rather than the nine indicated in Stephanomeria Flower heads are small while the stems Table 1 more conservative treatments include several as are thin and wiry Hence the name 'Wirelettuce' (not named varieties within L. grandiflora. Two of the more illustrated). Prenanthella was formerly included here. striking are shown in Figure 2. Variety dianthopsis is widespread in our foothills and comes in pink or white. Rafinesquia Stunning as individuals and doubly so Variety grandiflora is a gorgeous plant found in Pinyon- when a vigorous plant has a display of many flower Juniper woodland. The genus used to include the spiny heads. Inhabiting the Mohave Desert areas it is often set shrub now known as Pleiacanthus. against a background of harsh rock or vivid sand. Malacothrix Intermountain Region boasts several Glyptopleura Two little gems enter Utah mainly in the species, the most distinctive of which is the Smooth extreme south and west. Holy Dandelion, Glyptopleura Desert Dandelion (M. glabrata), with slender divided setulosa occurs here at the northern edge of its range leaves and showy yellow flowers. Most other members which scatters from Arizona across to the Mohave of the genus are less conspicuous and can be hard to tell Desert of Southern California. Its flowers are relatively apart. Many authorities, including FNA keep two species huge, in some ways echoing small pincushion cacti such apart as separate genera, Anisocoma (illustrated) and as Pediocactus winkleri. Calycoseris. And finally, the one that got me into writing this article, Atrichoseris The sole member of the genus is A. Glyptopleura marginata. Utah plants are at the eastern platyphylla which makes a fine show when Death Valley edge of the species range which is primarily along the has a good Spring bloom. Known as Parachute Plant California side of the Great Basin and Mohave Desert. Its because the white flower heads seem to float above vernacular names "Crustleaf" or "Carveseed" don't do 4 Sego Lily Spring 43(2) a b c Figure 3 The planet’s only two Carveseeds (Glyptopleura) are found in Utah.
Recommended publications
  • Leading Botanists in San Diego Nancy Carol Carter
    Journal of the California Garden & Landscape History Society Vol. 14, No. 4 • Fall 2011 The Brandegees: Leading Botanists in San Diego Nancy Carol Carter [This article, originally published in The Journal of San Diego History, is reprinted here, by permission, in a somewhat abridged form.1] he most renowned botanical couple of 19th-century and generally agreeing with his scientific principles, the T America lived in San Diego from 1894 until 1906. Brandegees eventually claimed a superior ability to classify They were early settlers in the Bankers Hill area, initially and appropriately name the plants they had collected and constructing a brick herbarium to house the world’s best observed in situ. Fully aware of delays and impatient with private collection of plant specimens from the western the imprecision of more distant classification work, both United States and Mexico. They lived in a tent until their resisted the tradition of submitting new species to Gray or treasured plant collection was properly protected, then built other East Coast scientists for botanical description.3 They a house connected to the herbarium. Around their home became expert taxonomists who described and defended they established San Diego’s first botanical garden—a col- their science in West Coast journals. During their lifetimes, lection of rare and exotic plants that furthered their research the Brandegees published a combined total of 159 scientific and delighted visitors. papers.4 Their example in- Botanists and plant ex- spired other Pacific Coast perts from around the botanists to greater confidence world knew of this garden in their own field experience and traveled to San Diego and the value of botanically to study its plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve Land Management Plan (LMP)
    State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN for INDIAN JOE SPRINGS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Inyo County, California April, 2018 Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -1- April, 2018 Land Management Plan INDIAN JOE SPRINGS ECOLOGICAL RESERVE FINAL LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -ii- April, 2018 Land Management Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -iv- April, 2018 Land Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES vii I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Purpose of and History of Acquisition 1 B. Purpose of This Management Plan 1 II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2 A. Geographical Setting 2 B. Property Boundaries and Adjacent Lands 2 C. Geology, Soils, Climate, Hydrology 3 D. Cultural Features 13 III. HABITAT AND SPECIES DESCRIPTION 15 A. Vegetation Communities, Habitats 15 B. Plant Species 18 C. Animal Species 20 D. Threatened, Rare or Endangered Species 22 IV. MANAGEMENT GOALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 35 A. Definition of Terms Used in This Plan 35 B. Biological Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 35 C. Biological Monitoring Element: Goals & Environmental Impacts 39 D. Public Use Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 41 E. Facility Maintenance Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 44 F. Cultural Resource Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 46 G. Administrative Elements: Goals & Environmental Impacts 46 V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY 48 Existing Staff and Additional Personnel Needs Summary 48 VI. CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES 48 VII. FUTURE REVISIONS TO LAND MANAGEMENT PLANS 51 VIII. REFERENCES 54 Indian Joe Springs Ecological Reserve -v- April, 2018 Land Management Plan APPENDICES: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Flatsedge (Cyperus Fuscus)
    Invasive Plant Science and Management 2010 3:240–245 Spread, Growth Parameters, and Reproductive Potential for Brown Flatsedge (Cyperus fuscus) Charles T. Bryson and Richard Carter* Brown flatsedge (Cyperus fuscus) is widely distributed in Europe, Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and the Mediterranean region of Northern Africa. It was apparently introduced into North America in the late 1800s and has steadily moved southward and westward. Brown flatsedge is reported new to Arkansas and Mississippi herewith. Field observations from early spring until frost were made between 2003 and 2007 from populations present at three sites: Chicot County, Arkansas, and Pearl River and Washington counties, Mississippi. Under natural field conditions, brown flatsedge plants germinated from late March and early April until frost. Inflorescences were observed in mid-May and seed production continued until frost. In field populations, the average numbers of scales per spikelet, inflorescences per plant, and spikelets per inflorescence were 15, 28, and 33, respectively. Greenhouse experiments were established in 2008 at Stoneville, MS, to determine growth parameters and the reproductive potential of brown flatsedge. In greenhouse experiments, by 10 wk after emergence (WAE), brown flatsedge plants were 30.2 cm tall and 63.9 cm in diameter, and dry weights were 1.4, 1.0, 2.0, 0.5, and 1.9 g for roots, culms, leaves, bracts, and inflorescences, respectively. Brown flatsedge culms and inflorescences appeared 5 WAE, and by 9 WAE all plants were producing seed. Brown flatsedge could pose a threat to natural plant communities and rice agriculture in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, and Texas. Additional research is needed to determine seed longevity and ecological range potential, and to develop inexpensive and effective control methods.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0263516 A1 CYR (43) Pub
    US 20090263516A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0263516 A1 CYR (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 22, 2009 (54) PLANT EXTRACT COMPOSITION AND Publication Classification THEIR USE TO MODULATE CELLULAR (51) Int. Cl. ACTIVITY A636/8962 (2006.01) A636/00 (2006.01) (75) Inventor: Benoit CYR, St. Augustin de A6IP35/00 (2006.01) Desmaures (CA) CI2N 5/06 (2006.01) Correspondence Address: A6IR 36/3 (2006.01) SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON A 6LX 36/899 (2006.01) LLP (52) U.S. Cl. ......... 424/754; 424/725; 435/375; 424/774; 990 Marsh Road 424/779; 424/755; 424/750; 424/777 Menlo Park, CA 94025 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (73) Assignee: Biopharmacopae Design Extracts from plant material, or semi-purified/purified mol International Inc., Saint-Foy (CA) ecules or compounds prepared from the extracts that demon strate the ability to modulate one or more cellular activities (21) Appl. No.: 12/263,114 are provided. The extracts are capable of slowing down, inhibiting or preventing cell migration, for example, the (22) Filed: Oct. 31, 2008 migration of endothelial cells or neoplastic cells and thus, the use of the extracts to slow down, inhibit or prevent abnormal Related U.S. Application Data cell migration in an animal is also provided. Methods of selecting and preparing the plant extracts and methods of (63) Continuation of application No. 10/526,387, filed on screening the extracts to determine their ability to modulate Oct. 6, 2005, now abandoned, filed as application No. one or more cellular activity are described. The purification or PCT/CA03/01284 on Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (4)5
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA Academy of Sciences FOURTH SERIES Vol. V 1915 OS" SAN P^RANCISCO PUBLISHED BY THE ACADEMY 1915 COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION George C. Edwards, Chairman C. E. Grunsky Barton Warren Evermann, Editor CONTENTS OF VOLUME V. Plates 1-19. PAGE Title-page i Contents iii Report of the President of the Academy for the Year 1914. By C. E. Grunsky 1 (Published March 26, 1915) Report of the Director of the Museum for the Year 1914. By Barton Warren Evermann - 1 1 (Published March 26, 1915) Fauna of the Type Tejon : Its Relation to the Cowlitz Phase of the Tejon Group of Washington. By Roy E. Dickerson. (Plates 1-11) 33 (Published June 15, 1915) A List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Utah, with Notes on the Species in the Collection of the Academy. By John Van Den- burgh and Joseph R. Slevin. (Plates 12-14) 99 (Published June 15, 1915) Description of a New Subgenus (Arborimus) of Phenacomys, with a Contribution to Knowledge of the Habits and Distribution of Phenacomys longicaudus True. By Walter P. Taylor. (Plate 15) 1 1 1 (Published December 30, 1915) Tertiary Deposits of Northeastern Mexico. By E. T. Durable. (Plates 16-19) 163 (Published December 31, 1915) Report of the President of the Academy for the Year 1915. By C. E. Grunsky 195 (Published May 4, 1916) Report of the Director of the Museum for the Year 1915. By Barton Warren Evermann 203 (Published May 4, 1916) Index 225, 232 July 19, 1916 / f / ^3 F»ROCEDEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Fourth Series Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Noncarice Sedge
    CYPERACEAE etal Got Sedge? Part Two revised 24 May 2015. Draft from Designs On Nature; Up Your C 25 SEDGES, FOINS COUPANTS, LAÎCHES, ROUCHES, ROUCHETTES, & some mostly wet things in the sedge family. Because Bill Gates has been shown to eat footnotes (burp!, & enjoy it), footnotes are (italicized in the body of the text) for their protection. Someone who can spell caespitose only won way has know imagination. Much of the following is taken verbatim from other works, & often not credited. There is often not a way to paraphrase or rewrite habitat or descriptive information without changing the meaning. I am responsible for any mistakes in quoting or otherwise. This is a learning tool, & a continuation of an idea of my friend & former employer, Jock Ingels, LaFayette Home Nursery, who hoped to present more available information about a plant in one easily accessible place, instead of scattered though numerous sources. This is a work in perpetual progress, a personal learning tool, full uv misstakes, & written as a personal means instead of a public end. Redundant, repetitive, superfluous, & contradictory information is present. It is being consolidated. CYPERACEAE Sauergrasgewächse SEDGES, aka BIESIES, SEGGEN Formally described in 1789 by De Jussieu. The family name is derived from the genus name Cyperus, from the Greek kupeiros, meaning sedge. Many species are grass-like, being tufted, with long, thin, narrow leaves, jointed stems, & branched inflorescence of small flowers, & are horticulturally lumped with grasses as graminoids. Archer (2005) suggests the term graminoid be used for true grasses, & cyperoid be used for sedges. (If physical anthropologists have hominoids & hominids, why don’t we have graminoids & graminids?) There are approximately 104 genera, 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes, & about 5000 species worldwide, with 27 genera & 843 species in North America (Ball et al 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Checklist
    Plants of the Clipper Mountains, Mojave Desert By David L. Magney & Ileene Anderson 24 March 2005 Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Gh Esx BW BS Acacia greggii Cat's-claw S Fabaceae X Ambrosia dumosa Burro Bush S Asteraceae X X X X Amsinckia menziesii var. intermedia Rancher's Fire AH Boraginaceae X X Antirrhinum filipes Twining Snapdragon AV Scrophulariaceae X Aristida purpurea Purple Three-awned Grass PG Poaceae X Arundo donax* Giant Reed PG Poaceae X Asclepias subulata Rush Milkweed S Asclepidaceae X Astragalus cf. didymocarpus Two-seeded Milkvetch AH Fabaceae X Astragalus nuttallianus Turkeypeas, Nuttall Locoweed AH Fabaceae X Atrichoseris platyphylla Gravel Ghost AH Asteraceae X X Atriplex hymenolytra Desert Holly S Chenopodiaceae X Baccharis sarothroides Desertbroom Baccharis S Asteraceae X Bebbia juncea Sweet Bush S Asteraceae X X Brickellia californica California Brickellbush S Asteraceae X Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens* Red Brome AG Poaceae X X Camissonia boothii Shreading-bark Primrose AH Polygonaceae X Camissonia brevipes Golden Suncup AH Onagraceae X X Camissonia californica Mustard Primrose AH Onagraceae X Camissonia refracta? Narrowleaf Suncup AH Onagraceae X Chaenactis carphoclinia Pebble Pincushion AH Asteraceae X Chaenactis fremontii Fremont Pincushion AH Asteraceae X X Chamaesyce polycarpa? Many-seeded Spurge PH Euphorbiaceae X Chorizanthe brevicornu Short-horned Spineflower AH Boraginaceae X X Chorizanthe nevadensis Nevada Spineflower AH Boraginaceae X Chorizanthe rigida Rigid Spineflower AH Polygonaceae X Cryptantha
    [Show full text]