Ultra Structure of Cell and Cell Organelles and Their Functions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Root Hydrotropism, Or Any Other Plant Differential C
American Journal of Botany 100(1): 14–24. 2013. R OOT HYDROTROPISM: AN UPDATE 1 G LADYS I. CASSAB 2 , D ELFEENA E APEN, AND M ARÍA EUGENIA C AMPOS Departamento de Biología Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 510-3, Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Mor. 62250 México While water shortage remains the single-most important factor infl uencing world agriculture, there are very few studies on how plants grow in response to water potential, i.e., hydrotropism. Terrestrial plant roots dwell in the soil, and their ability to grow and explore underground requires many sensors for stimuli such as gravity, humidity gradients, light, mechanical stimulations, tem- perature, and oxygen. To date, extremely limited information is available on the components of such sensors; however, all of these stimuli are sensed in the root cap. Directional growth of roots is controlled by gravity, which is fi xed in direction and intensity. However, other environmental factors, such as water potential gradients, which fl uctuate in time, space, direction, and intensity, can act as a signal for modifying the direction of root growth accordingly. Hydrotropism may help roots to obtain water from the soil and at the same time may participate in the establishment of the root system. Current genetic analysis of hydrotropism in Arabidopsis has offered new players, mainly AHR1, NHR1, MIZ1 , and MIZ2 , which seem to modulate how root caps sense and choose to respond hydrotropically as opposed to other tropic responses. Here we review the mechanism(s) by which these genes and the plant hormones abscisic acid and cytokinins coordinate hydrotropism to counteract the tropic responses to gravitational fi eld, light or touch stimuli. -
Physical and Chemical Basis of Cytoplasmic Streaming
Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline .4n~t Rev. Plant Physiol 1981. 32:205-36 Copyright© 1981by AnnualReviews In~ All rights reserved PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL BASIS OF CYTOPLASMIC ~7710 STREAMING Nobur6 Kamiya Department of Cell Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, 444 Japan CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 206 SHUTI’LE STREAMINGIN THE MYXOMYCETEPLASMODIUM ................ 207 General...................................................................................................................... 207 ContractileProperties of the PlasmodialStrand ...................................................... 208 Activationcaused by stretching .................................................................................. 208 Activationcaused by loading .................................................................................... 209 Synchronizationof local ,hythms .............................................................................. 209 ContractileProteins .................................................................................................. 210 Plasmodiumactomyosin .......................................................................................... 210 Plusmodiummyosin ................................................................................................ 210 Plusmodiumactin.................................................................................................... 211 -
Overview of the Cytoskeleton from an Evolutionary Perspective
Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Overview of the Cytoskeleton from an Evolutionary Perspective Thomas D. Pollard1 and Robert D. Goldman2 1Departments of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, and Cell Biology ,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8103 2Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Correspondence: [email protected] SUMMARY Organisms in the three domains of life depend on protein polymers to form a cytoskeleton that helps to establish their shapes, maintain their mechanical integrity, divide, and, in many cases, move. Eukaryotes have the most complex cytoskeletons, comprising three cytoskeletal poly- mers—actin filaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules—acted on by three families of motor proteins (myosin, kinesin, and dynein). Prokaryotes have polymers of proteins ho- mologous to actin and tubulin but no motors, and a few bacteria have a protein related to intermediate filament proteins. Outline 1 Introduction—Overview of cellular 4 Overview of the evolution of the cytoskeleton functions 5 Conclusion 2 Structures of the cytoskeletal polymers References 3 Assembly of cytoskeletal polymers Editors: Thomas D. Pollard and Robert D. Goldman Additional Perspectives on The Cytoskeleton available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2018 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a030288 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2018;10:a030288 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press T.D. Pollard and R.D. Goldman 1 INTRODUCTION—OVERVIEW OF CELLULAR contrast, intermediate filaments do not serve as tracks for FUNCTIONS molecular motors (reviewed by Herrmann and Aebi 2016) but, rather, are transported by these motors. -
P80-Coilin: a Component of Coiled Bodies and Interchromatin Granule- Associated Zones
Journal of Cell Science 108, 1143-1153 (1995) 1143 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1995 p80-coilin: a component of coiled bodies and interchromatin granule- associated zones Francine Puvion-Dutilleul1,*, Sylvie Besse1, Edward K. L. Chan2, Eng M. Tan2 and Edmond Puvion1 1Laboratoire de Biologie et Ultrastructure du Noyau de l’UPR 9044 CNRS, BP 8, F-94801 Villejuif Cedex, France 2The Scripps Research Institute, W. M. Keck Autoimmune Disease Center, 10666 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA *Author for correspondence SUMMARY We investigated at the electron microscope level the fate of the clusters of interchromatin granules and their associated the three intranuclear structures known to accumulate zones, which were all easily recognizable within the snRNPs, and which correspond to the punctuate immuno- residual nuclear ribonucleoprotein network, was unmodi- fluorescent staining pattern (the coiled bodies, the clusters fied. The data indicate, therefore, that the loosening of interchromatin granules and the interchromatin procedure as well as the high salt extraction procedure granule-associated zones) after exposure to either a low salt preserve the snRNA content of all three spliceosome medium which induces a loosening and partial spreading component-accumulation sites and reveal that interchro- of nucleoprotein fibers or a high ionic strength salt medium matin granule-associated zones are elements of the nuclear and subsequent DNase I digestion, in order to obtain DNA- matrix. The p80-coilin content of coiled bodies was also depleted nuclear matrices. The loosened clusters of inter- preserved whatever the salt treatment used. An intriguing chromatin granules and the coiled bodies could no longer new finding is the detection of abundant p80-coilin within be distinguished from surrounding nucleoprotein fibers the interchromatin granule-associated zones, both before solely by their structure, but constituents of the clusters of and after either low or high salt treatment of cells. -
Some Considerations of Protoplasm
THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XXV MAY, 1925 No. 3 SOME CONSIDERATIONS OF PROTOPLASM. BRUCE FINK, Department of Botany, Miami University. One of the most fundamental problems in biological science is that which concerns protoplasm. Yet there is great diver- sity of opinion among biologists regarding what constitutes protoplasm and some doubt whether the term protoplasm is really worth retaining. In the present state of knowledge, protoplasm can not be defined in any terms of physical structure which will be accepted, without qualification, by a majority of botanists, and can only be defined somewhat more satis- factorily in terms of colloidal chemistry. Again, though chemi- cal definition is somewhat more certain than physical, this alone is far from satisfactory to those who think of cell con- tents in terms of microscopic structure. It is sometimes stated by certain biologists that proto- plasm is essentially alike in all organism. This may be true in the rough if we define in purely chemical terms; or if we content ourselves with the statement that protoplasm is the living substance of the cell, knowing not how much of the cell is alive, and, therefore, protoplasm. Turning to those very lowly organized plants, the bacteria, most of us will agree that the whole cell content, inclusive or exclusive of the vacuoles, composes the protoplasm. For higher fungi and for animals the situation is about the same, except that definite nuclei here replace the nuclear granules commonly supposed to exist in bacteria. Turning attention to higher green plants, we find that the cells are much more complex with respect to visible contents. -
The Cell-Theory: a Restatement, History, and Critique Part III
*57 The Cell-theory: A Restatement, History, and Critique Part III. The Cell as a Morphological Unit By JOHN R. BAKER (From the Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, Oxford) SUMMARY A long time elapsed after the discovery of cells before they came to be generally regarded as morphological units. As a first step it was necessary to show that the cell-walls of plants were double and that cells could therefore be separated. The earliest advances in this direction were made by Treviranus (1805) and Link (1807). The idea of a cell was very imperfect, however, so long as attention was con- centrated on its wall. The first person who stated clearly that the cell-wall is not a necessary constituent was Leydig (1857). Subsequently the cell came to be regarded as a naked mass of protoplasm with a nucleus, and to this unit the name of protoplast was given. The true nature of the limiting membrane of the protoplast was discovered by Overton (1895). The plasmodesmata or connective strands that sometimes connect cells were prob- ably first seen by Hartig, in sieve-plates (1837). They are best regarded from the point of view of their functions in particular cases. They do not provide evidence for the view that the whole of a multicellular organism is basically a protoplasmic unit. Two or more nuclei in a continuous mass of protoplasm appear to have been seen for the first time in 1802, by Bauer. That an organism may consist wholly of a syn- cytium was discovered in i860, in the Mycetozoa. -
Intelligent Behaviors of Amoeboid Movement Based on Complex Dynamics of Soft Matter
REVIEW www.rsc.org/softmatter | Soft Matter Intelligent behaviors of amoeboid movement based on complex dynamics of soft matter Toshiyuki Nakagakiab and Robert D. Guyc Received 25th April 2007, Accepted 26th September 2007 First published as an Advance Article on the web 2nd November 2007 DOI: 10.1039/b706317m We review how soft matter is self-organized to perform information processing at the cell level by examining the model organism Physarum plasmodium. The amoeboid organism, Physarum polycephalum, in the class of true slime molds, exhibits the intelligent behavior of foraging in complex situations. When placed in a maze with food sources at two exits, the organism develops tubular structures with its body which connect the food sources along the shortest path so that the rates of nutrient absorption and intracellular communication are maximized. This intelligent behavior results from the organism’s control of a dynamic network through which mechanical and chemical information is transmitted. We review experimental studies that explore the development and adaptation of structures that make up the network. Recently a model of the dynamic network has been developed, and we review the formulation of this model and present some key results. The model captures the dynamics of existing networks, but it does not answer the question of how such networks form initially. To address the development of cell shape, we review existing mechanochemical models of the protoplasm of Physarum, present more general models of motile cells, and discuss how to adapt existing models to explore the development of intelligent networks in Physarum. 1. Introduction: intelligence at the cell level From a material science point of view, the cell is an exotic system in which nonliving materials act together to The cell is the elementary unit of all organisms. -
The Mechanics of Motility in Dissociated Cytoplasm
THE MECHANICS OF MOTILITY IN DISSOCIATED CYTOPLASM MICAH DEMBO Theoretical Biophysics, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Group T-10, Mail Stop K710, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 ABSTRACT We stimulate the dynamical behavior of dissociated cytoplasm using the Reactive Flow Model (Dembo, M., and F. Harlow, 1986, Biophys. J., 50:109-121). We find that for the most part the predicted dynamical behavior of the cytoplasm is governed by three nondimensional numbers. Several other nondimensional parameters, the initial conditions, and boundary conditions are found to have lesser effects. Of the three major nondimensional parameters, one (D#) controls the percentage of ectoplasm, the second (CO) controls the sharpness of the endoplasm-ectoplasm boundary, and the third (R#) controls the topological complexity of the endoplasm-ectoplasm distribution. If R# is very small, then the cytoplasm contracts into a single uniform mass, and there is no bulk streaming. If R# is very large, then the cytoplasmic mass breaks up into a number of clumps scattered throughout the available volume. Between these clumps the solution undergoes turbulent or chaotic patterns of streaming. Intermediate values of R# can be found such that the mass of cytoplasm remains connected and yet undergoes coherent modes of motility similar to flares (Taylor, D.L., J.S. Condeelis, P.L. Moore, and R.D. Allen, 1973, J. Cell Biol., 59:378-394) and rosettes (Kuroda, K., 1979, Cell Motility: Molecules and Organization, 347-362). INTRODUCTION (Dembo et al., 1986). Here we will consider two experi- in which chemical reaction is an essential The reactive flow model is a putative description of motile mental systems fluid part of the dynamics. -
Bathybius Haeckelii and the Psychology of Scientific Discovery
NICOLAAS A. RUPKE BATHYBIUS HAECKELII AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY THEORY INSTEAD OF OBSERVED DATA CONTROLLED THE LATE 19th CENTURY ‘DISCOVERY’ OF A PRIMITIVE FORM OF LIFE THE TRADITIONAL image of the scientist as an objective fact finder has become seriously tarnished by recent work in the history and philosophy of science. ’ It is argued that the growth of science is not always brought about by a reasoned debate based on objective evidence. Instead, scientific discovery seems to be controlled quite as much by certain psychological factors such as respect for a theoretical superstructure. The debate around T. S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has brought similar iconoclastic aspects of scientific conduct to the attention of a cross section of the scholarly community.’ Without wanting to enter into the controversy generated by Kuhn’s book,3 this paper records one of the better examples from the annals of science to show how respect for a theoretical superstructure brought about a fictitious discovery. Specifically, it records how confidence in the heuristic value of evolutionary theory in the second half of the 19th century produced the discovery of a fictitious primitive form of life, called Bathybius, its sub-division into two genera, its reported occur- rence over vast regions of the ocean floor, its identification in the geologic record, and its wide acceptance in the life and earth sciences for the period of almost a decade. Background to the ‘Discovery’ Shortly after the publication of Darwin’s The Ongin of Species (1859), 1 See review paper by S. G. -
NPM/B23: the Effector of CDK2 in the Control of Centrosome Duplication and Mrna Processing
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: October 7th, 2004 I, ________________Yukari Tokuyama___________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctor of Philosophy in: Cell and Molecular Biology It is entitled: NPM/B23: The Effector of CDK2 in the Control of Centrosome Duplication and mRNA Processing This work and its defense approved by: Chair: Kenji Fukasawa, Ph.D. Robert W. Brackenbury, Ph.D. Wallace S. Ip, Ph.D. Erik S. Knudsen, Ph.D. Yolanda Sanchez, Ph.D. NPM/B23: THE EFFECTOR OF CDK2 IN THE CONTROL OF CENTROSOME DUPLICATION AND mRNA PROCESSING A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) In the Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy of the College of Medicine 2004 by Yukari Tokuyama B.S. Texas A&M University, 1998 Committee Chair: Kenji Fukasawa, Ph.D. Robert W. Brackenbury, Ph.D. Wallace S. Ip, Ph.D. Erik S. Knudsen, Ph.D. Yolanda Sanchez, Ph.D. Abstract Nucleophosmin (NPM/B23) is a phosphoprotein predominantly localized in the nucleolus, and is believed to function in ribosome assembly, cytonuclear shuttling, and molecular chaperoning. Here we report novel functions of NPM/B23 in initiation of centrosome duplication and mRNA processing. The centrosome, a major microtubule organizing center of cells, directs the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles, which is essential for proper chromosome segregation to daughter cells. Cancer cells frequently contain abnormal numbers of centrosomes suggesting that centrosome amplification is the major contributing factor for chromosome instability. -
The Nucleus Introduced
Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The Nucleus Introduced Thoru Pederson Program in Cell and Developmental Dynamics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605 Correspondence: [email protected] Now is an opportune moment to address the confluence of cell biological form and function that is the nucleus. Its arrival is especially timely because the recognition that the nucleus is extremely dynamic has now been solidly established as a paradigm shift over the past two decades, and also because we now see on the horizon numerous ways in which organization itself, including gene location and possibly self-organizing bodies, underlies nuclear functions. “We have entered the cell, the Mansion of our microscopy, Antony van Leeuwenhoeck, did birth, and started the inventory of our acquired so with amphibian and avian erythrocytes in wealth.” 1710 and that in 1781 Felice Fontana did so as —Albert Claude well in eel skin cells. More definitive accounts followed by Franz Bauer, who in 1802 sketched hen I first read that morsel from Albert orchid cells and pointed out the nucleus (Bauer WClaude’s 1974 Nobel Prize lecture it 1830–1838), as well as by Jan Purkyneˇ, who seemed Solomonic wisdom, as it indeed was. described it as the vesicula germanitiva in Though he was referring to cell biology chicken oocytes (Purkyneˇ 1825), and Robert en toto, the study of the nucleus was then at a Brown who observed it in a variety of plant cells tipping point and new advances were just at (Brown 1829–1832), earning additional fame hand. -
Cell & Molecular Biology
BSC ZO- 102 B. Sc. I YEAR CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY BSCZO-102 Cell and Molecular Biology DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Phone No. 05946-261122, 261123 Toll free No. 18001804025 Fax No. 05946-264232, E. mail [email protected] htpp://uou.ac.in Board of Studies and Programme Coordinator Board of Studies Prof. B.D.Joshi Prof. H.C.S.Bisht Retd.Prof. Department of Zoology Department of Zoology DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Gurukul Kangri, University Nainital Haridwar Prof. H.C.Tiwari Dr.N.N.Pandey Retd. Prof. & Principal Senior Scientist, Department of Zoology, Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries MB Govt.PG College (ICAR) Haldwani Nainital. Bhimtal (Nainital). Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Programme Coordinator Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital Unit writing and Editing Editor Writer Dr.(Ms) Meenu Vats Dr.Mamtesh Kumari , Professor & Head Associate. Professor Department of Zoology, Department of Zoology DAV College,Sector-10 Govt. PG College Chandigarh-160011 Uttarkashi (Uttarakhand) Dr.Sunil Bhandari Asstt. Professor. Department of Zoology BGR Campus Pauri, HNB (Central University) Garhwal. Course Title and Code : Cell and Molecular Biology (BSCZO 102) ISBN : 978-93-85740-54-1 Copyright : Uttarakhand Open University Edition : 2017 Published By : Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital- 263139 Contents Course 1: Cell and Molecular Biology Course code: BSCZO102 Credit: 3 Unit Block and Unit title Page number Number Block 1 Cell Biology or Cytology 1-128 1 Cell Type : History and origin.