Greek experience with water management under water scarcity, with emphasis on islands
Nicholas Petroulias, Chairman of Hellenic Water Associa on Greece
14 Dec, 2016 Contents
Α • Hellenic Water Associa on (HWA)
Β • Greek Regulatory Framework/Ins tu ons and their roles
C • Desalina on and Water Treatment in Greece
D • Non Revenue Water in Greece
E • PPP and Performance Based Contracts
F • Coopera on Opportuni es Hellenic Water Associa on Who we are Hellenic Water Associa on (HWA) is a non-profit associa on. The Greek Governing . Founded in , non governmental, non-profit and voluntary organiza on. A , support top-class research, provide high-quality service to society. The main purpose of HWA is to play a primary role in water and wastewater management.
The idealis c core is the applica on of the The ul mate goal of the HWA is to assist in best available prac ces and contemporary the environmental awareness of the society methods for water and wastewater and contribute to its sustainable growth management Αn interdisciplinary associa on that primarily aims to.. Provide scien fic and professional support to water operators
Help develop and implement policies concerning Water and Wastewater Management
Develop educa onal programs and projects water and wastewater management policies Be recognized at a na onal level as the most specialized body of experts on water and wastewater management technical issues Consult the Greek Government on environmental legisla ve aspects and policies the Hellenic Water Associa on has set very high in its agenda..
On the one the provision of Οn the other, hand, HWA as support through HWA tries to an ensemble and technical sessions, convey the through each of seminars, obtained know- its members workshops and how to all key individually- conferences in the stakeholder tries to stay on field of Water groups, forming top of the Losses aiming to thus a chain interna onal assist Water between developments in U li es in building interna onal the constantly capaci es within prac ces and evolving field of their organiza ons local managerial water tradi ons management What we’ve done
HWA has managed to achieve mul -diverse ac ons and essen al publicity
Strong founda ons towards the goal of achieving greater public response
Several Conferences, with representa on by Board Members, but also by Regular Members of the Associa on (Scien fic & Organizing Commi ees)
Since March of 2013, HWA is a member of the IWA
Claimed and ensured the one and only posi on reserved for Greece in the General Assembly of Governing Members of IWA. “EU Good Practices on Leakage Management“
Ø For informa on regarding HWA and its ac vity, please visit our website: h p://www.hwa.gr/ Water Management Task Force
Ø Distribution and Technical Support to the Utilities and Municipalities of: “EurWB&PICalcs” (European Water Balance & Performance Indicators Calculations) of the LEAKS Suite (Leakage Evaluation and Assessment Know-how software) by the ILMSS Ltd. for the assessment of leakage throughout the water distribution networks of Municipalities- Water Utilities *from the ILMSS Ltd. website HWA organizes.. o May 2015 in the city of Thessaloniki, the IWA Balkan Young Water Professionals 2015 Conference (h p://www.bywp2015.gr/), in collabora on with IWA. o Common Conference “INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES IN THE NEW ERA”, with the Hellenic Hydrotechnical Associa on (ΕΥΕ) and the Greek Commi ee on Water Resources Management (ΕΕΔΥΠ) in Athens, December 2015. (h p://3rd-conference.waterinfo.gr/) o Periodic “newsle er” named Ύδωρ (Hydor- water in ancient Greek, root for hydr-) ¥ not only in the literal sense of “know-how” but in a greater sense Par cipa ons- Co-organizing Events
Ø the organization of the 13th International Conference v 2nd EWaS Conference- Chania Greece, June “Small Water 2016 and Watewater (Co-organizing) Systems” ( h p:// Participation in the Workshop that was www.swws2016. organized by University of Thessaly, Civil Engineering Department for the members of the gr/), with the Greek Water Utilities within the framework of collaboration of DRINKADRIA project (IPA Adriatic programme the NTUA 2007-2013) National Technical The Workshop was about “Efficient and U n i v e r s i t y o f Reciprocating Use of Urban Water” Athens, under Our participation was about stating the “Need the aegis of the for adoption of common methodology tools for IWA the efficient operation of water distribution networks in Greece”
Par cipa ons- Co-organizing Events
Participation in the 2-day v Participation in the Water Conference Conference of the Greek 2016* as “honorary support” & oral Association of Utilities (April presentation 2016) * The Annual Encounter for the Sustainable Title: “Single adop on of water Water Resources Management balance and reclama on of new Topic Units: technologies in the U li es ü Contemporary Challenges & Methods to networks” Manage and Govern Water Resources Representa on by our member Mr. ü Good Practices for Implementing Tools, Charalambous (past Chair of IWA’s Technological Solutins and Innovations in Water WLSG) with the subject of “Prac cal Resources Management implementa on of the IWA ü Water Security methodology on water loss management throughout water ü Blue Cities distribu on networks” ü Dialogues Panels: E n e r g y / W a t e r / Development and Water Consciousness
Primary Goals
‘’conveying the need for healthy, efficient strategic planning, aiming at a reduc on of losses –both physical and financial. Within this framework, we are promo ng the efficiency of “smart” and “integrated” solu ons’’
‘’promo ng best prac ces and methodologies for managing and reducing water losses ‘’
‘’crea ng the necessary condi ons for mainstreaming water losses in water u lity opera ons ‘’ The Greek Water U li es record daily enormous losses (physical & financial)
“Poor” network condi ons, because of the corresponding “poor” management
The insufficient and inefficient pressure management
The accumulated damages, breaks, leaks and bursts in the network, the difficulty of tracing and repairing them
The insufficient level of accuracy and quality of measurements Our approach on Water Losses Management
What are the advantages On-going ac vity, and not a one me solu on vIncrease in efficiency Quintessen al part of the vReinforcement of a sustainable opera onal management of water strategy distribu on networks vReduc on of the energy needs and power Long term planning strategies use vIncrease of income for the Supplier / reduc on in non-revenue water Economically advantageous in vElonga on of the lifespan of the system’s case of drought infrastructure v Adop ng of suitable- Less needs for investments in the appropriate methodologies maintenance field- damages, replacements etc. The basic steps in targe ng the Water Losses for the Greek Water U li es a) evaluation/ calculation of losses b) identifying of the “source”- reason for losses c) prioritizing these reasons based on severity and importance d) planning of intervention solutions e) prioritizing the solutions f) implementation of the most efficient and “economic” solutions in the long run
Means & Strategies for Managing Losses* qKnowledge & evalua on of the network’s condi on qIsolated pressure zones qMeasuring systems, pressure-flow recording at the heads of the supply, crea ng databases qCalcula ng the water balance qPressure management program qIden fying the level of losses/zone qImplemen ng an ac ve leakage control program qFast and quality repair of leakages qUsing firm specifica ons when it comes to any part and material of the water distribu on network & to the procedures of installing new network sec ons qReplacing of problema c sec ons of the network which con nue to present a high burst frequency even a er all of the above *based on the basic IWA Best Prac ce methodology
Greek Regulatory Framework – Ins tu ons and their roles q Na onal Water Commission the high-level inter-ministerial body which is responsible for policy making for the management and protec on of water in na onal level q Na onal Registry of Water Abstrac on Points electronic registry, a database of geospa al data and services q Na onal Water Council consults the Na onal Water Commission for the na onal protec on and management of the country's water resources programs q Ministry of Environment, Energy & Climate Change Special Secretariat for Water responsible for the development and implementa on of all programs related to the protec on and management of the water resources in Greece and the coordina on of all competent authori es dealing with the aqua c environment q Decentralized Administra ons water protec on and management strategy q Regional Authori es strategic planning q Municipal Enterprises for Water Supply and Sewerage provide water supply & sewerage services, design, construct, install, operate, manage, maintain, expand & upgrade water supply & sewerage systems, pump, desalinate, process, transfer, store & distribute water, manage & dispose the wastewater treatment products q Associa on of Municipal Enterprises for Water Supply and Sewerage coordinate the ac vi es of 115 members and assists them to improve their services in the water supply and sewage sectors (EUREAU member) Greek Regulatory Framework – Ins tu ons and their roles Ownership of water supply infrastructure Municipal Enterprises for Water Supply and Sewerage q Water and sanita on projects performed or to be performed on the basis of studies that has been or will be adopted in the area of competence. q Manage exis ng sewers and water and wastewater facili es as well as all the sewers or open channels that flow directly or indirectly to the network. q Operate all drinking water and wastewater treatment plants.
Athens Water Supply and Sewerage Company (EYDAP S.A.) q Largest water u lity in Greece, serves approximately 4,300,000 customers q Founded in 1980
Thessaloniki Water Supply and Sewerage Company (EYATH S.A.) q Greek State 74,02%, «SUEZ ENVIRONMENT» 5,462%, HMG GLOBETROTTER 1,06% q Founded in 1998 Regulatory framework- The “bo om-up” effort on our behalf
q Institution: Special Secretariat of Water Resources à hypo functioning q Branch of the above Institution: Regulatory Authority of Water Management, founded to target the lack of institutional interventions Each of the –several- inflicted Memorandums foresees the improvement and reinforcement of this Authority, but there has been no practical application of this requisite so far q All of our aforementioned actions and efforts presented today, aim at creating a sufficient “Precedent” in order to obtain the power to “put pressure” on the Government Institutions, Bodies and Ministries, regarding the need for enactment, using as much as Essen ally non-existent possible real info, data and practical examples Ønot because of lack of Ins tu ons but q Trying to promote European Standards/ examples from different Øbecause of absence of countries/ European References and Directives (like EU Good Practices on Leakage Management) by starting at the local Bodies ac ons, implementa on, à Water Utilities enforcement, specializa on, q Working on the regulatory matter with a “bottom-up” approach moderniza on instead of waiting for the long due “top-down” one Desalina on and Water Treatment
World desalina on plants per geographical area (%) Global installed desalina on capacity, 2010–2016
Founda on for Water Research, 2015 Interna onal Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2012 Desalina on and Water Treatment
Desalinated water produc on according to: (a) feed water; (b) its uses; and (c) the used technology, in Greece
Cuenca, J.C., 2012 Desalina on and Water Treatment
Deficit and/or qThe problem seems to be surplus of more evident in the Aegean potable water Islands (par cularly the per water Dodecanese and Cyclades), district in Thessaly in Central Greece, Greece eastern Con nental Greece Stefopoulou et al. (Sterea Greece), eastern (2008) Crete and the southeastern Peloponnese
q In central Greece (Thessaly and Sterea Greece), there is a high water demand for agricultural irriga on RO desalina on plants in Hellenic islands
35 RO plants opera ng in the Hellenic island municipali es with a total capacity of 22,860 m3/d and opera ng costs ranging from 0.13 €/m3 to 2.70 €/m3
The newest desalina on plant in Almyros (Iraklion, Crete), with a capacity of 2,400 m3/d (future upgrading of its capacity up to 20,000 m3/d)
Aggelakis et al, 20105 RO desalina on plants in Hellenic islands 2015 Desalina on Plant Construc on Type Capacity (m3/ Opera on Cost Year d) (€) Gazi, Irakleio (1) 2014 RO &UF 2400 0,25 Ermoupoli, Syros (9) 1992-2007 RO (PD) 4700 2,00-2,70 Poseidonias, Syros (3) 2000-2006 RO 1000 0,70
Vari, Syros (2) 2003-2006 RO 750 0,70 Galissas, Syros (2) 2007 RO 1000 0,70 Kini, Syros (2) 2000-2007 RO 750 0,70 Naxos (4) 2004-2014 RO 1250 0.70 Mykonos (3) 2001-2014 RO 9.000 2,00 Paros (2) 2001 RO, υφ. 1200 0,50 2015 ΡΟ 2400 0.50 Tinos (2) 2001-2005 RO 1000 0,70 Santorini (3) 1994-2002 RO 700 2,00 Sifnos 2002 RO, υφ. 500 3,50 Omiroupoli, Chios (6) 2000-2009 RO, υφ. 5200 0,60
Nisyros (3) 2002-2012 RO 950 0,70 Ithaki (3) 1990-2007 RO 1320 0.80 Aggelakis, 2015 Leros 2001 RO 200 0,50 Corfu (>20) RO 100 0,50 Paxoi (2) 2005 RO 500 0,60 Total (69) 34.920 RO desalina on plants in Hellenic islands The average opera ng costs Opera ng cost (€/m3) of seawater RO desalina on plants of 30 RO plants of seawater in the Hellenic islands desalina on in the Hellenic islands has been es mated at 0.85 €/m3.
The 480 m3/d capacity plant in Leros has a minimum opera onal cost of 0.13 €/m3, while the 500 m3/d capacity in Sifnos reaches the highest registered value of 3.5 €/m3.
Zotalis, 2012 RO desalina on plants in Hellenic islands
Greece has the Research and poten al to technology on The use of RO move forward the Water desalina on desalina on in terms of desalina on demand will technologies costs over the research and membrane con nue to may lead, to last 15 years technology on processes will increase and the best have been water con nue to desalina on economic, significantly management develop in the and water environmental reduced interna onally years to come reuse will be and social (the use of and especially to the sustainable results, for alterna ve in the direc on of op ons in both the energy sources Mediterranea becoming increasing the island will further n region, friendly to the low water environment reduce the provided there environment availability and the local cost) is investment and cost communi es in rela ve effec ve sectors Zotalis et al, 2014 Non Revenue Water
Defini on of NRW ‘Non-revenue water is the difference between the volume of water put into a water distribu on system and the volume that is billed to customers’ Comprised of three components (IWA Water Loss Task Force, 2003)
Physical losses: leakage from all parts of the distribu on system and overflows at the u lity's storage tanks (caused by poor opera ons and maintenance, the lack of ac ve leakage control & poor quality of underground assets)
Commercial losses: customer meter under-registra on, data-handling errors, and the of water in various forms
Unbilled authorized consump on: water used by the u lity for opera onal purposes, water used for fire figh ng, and water provided for free to certain consumer groups. Non Revenue Water Non Revenue Water globally is about 25% of the System Input Volume: q 80% Physical losses q 20% Commercial losses
The Manager’s Non-Revenue Water Handbook: A Guide to Understanding Water Losses, 2008 Non Revenue Water qThe measurement of NRW is complicated. qMany different indicators are used to measure NRW and virtually all of them have limita ons and drawbacks. Key informa on needed for conduc ng a water balance: • System input volume • Billed consump on • Unbilled consump on • Unauthorised consump on • Customer metering inaccuracies & data handling errors • Network data • Length of transmission mains, distribu on mains and service connec ons • Number of registered connec ons • Es mated number of illegal connec ons • Average pressure The Manager’s Non-Revenue Water Handbook: • Historic burst data A Guide to Understanding Water Losses, 2008 • Level of supply service (24-hour, intermi ent, etc) Non Revenue Water Interna onal Benchmarking Network for Water and Sanita on U li es (IBNET); www.ib-net.org A unique database is used globally for collec on of data on the financial and opera onal performance of water u li es
Cyprus Serbia
≈38% ≈17%
Bulgaria
≈60% Non Revenue Water in Greece
Population NRW % Population NRW % Water Utility Region Water Utility Region (2001) SIV (2001) SIV DRAMAS East Macedonia & Thrace 55.632 44,44 KERKYRAS Ionian Islands 32.751 51,12 CHRYSOUPOLIS East Macedonia & Thrace 15.768 24,42 SERRON Central Macedonia 56.145 36,89 KAVALAS East Macedonia & Thrace 60.809 54,33 KERKINHS Central Macedonia 10.098 85,00 XANTHIS East Macedonia & Thrace 52.270 57,92 EDESSAS Central Macedonia 25.619 35,52 MYTILHNHS North Aegean 36.196 42,29 KALLIKRATEIAS Central Macedonia 10.879 53,20 CHIOS North Aegean 23.779 38,26 HRAKLEIOU Crete 137.711 47,06 MESOLOGGI Western Greece 17.988 56,73 CHANION Crete 53.373 33,57 AMFILOHIAS Western Greece 12.834 37,50 AG. NIKOLAOU Crete 19.462 23,10 KASTORIAS West Macedonia 15.632 51,97 RODOU South Aegean 54.258 42,21 PREVEZAS Ipeirous 19.605 41,94 KALYMNOY South Aegean 16.441 27,78 IOANNINON Ipeirous 70.214 36,04 SYMHS South Aegean 13.270 36,80 VOLOU Thessalia 114.368 38,62 SPARTIS Peloponnisos 18.184 32,27 PYLHS TRIKALON Thessalia 1.839 29,17 KORINTHOU Peloponnisos 36.555 35,20 ALMYROU MAGN. Thessalia 12.636 43,76 TRIPOLEOS Peloponnisos 28.976 33,16 TRIKALON Thessalia 51.832 33,59 ARGOUS Peloponnisos 29.228 47,14 AGXIALOS MAGN. Thessalia 16.475 49,33 LIVADEIAS Sterea Ellada 21.492 51,50 MEGARON Attikis 28.195 39,55 LAMIAS Sterea Ellada 58.601 49,11 LEIV.KEFALL. Ionian Islands 4.663 48,20 It is es mated that NRW in Greece is about 50%-60% (according to the Greek Municipal Water and Sewerage Companies/EDEYA es ma ons) Non Revenue Water in Greece
-No benchmarking tools exist in Greece
-Only for specific water u li es using their own sources, through scien fic studies
DRAMA (Horis village) 2002 NRW % SIV 16,4 Petroulias N. et al 2016 LARISSA 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 NRW % SIV 35,19 29,50 30,09 31,77 30,64 29,89 Kanakoudis V. et al 2010 KOZANI 2009 2010 NRW % SIV 58,05 58,35 Petroulias N. et al 2013 KOS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 NRW % SIV 43,50 49,38 47,58 36,99 46,47 40,32 40,52 32,81 37,22 Kanakoudis V. at al 2014 ATHENS 1993 NRW % SIV 38 - 23 Kanellopoulou S., 2010 PPP and Performance Based Contracts
7 major types of private involvement: q Service contract: the par cipa on of the private sector is very limited. q Management contract: the private sector takes over opera on and management responsibili es. q Lease contract: the private company assumes the legal responsibility for opera ng the service in exchange for payments for the use of the fixed assets. The main tasks are opera on and maintenance. q Build-Operate-Transfer contract: the private sector is in charge of designing, building and financing a new investment project. q Concession contract: similar to the lease contract, but the contractor is in charge of financing the expansion and the rehabilita on of the network. q Joint venture contract: the state or municipality and a private operator co-own the water operator. Usually, the private sector holds the largest part of the newly created company. q Full dives ture: Under this arrangement, assets are en rely sold to the private sector. The private operator is in charge of financing, opera on, management and bears all the risks. GUIDELINES FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED CONTRACTS BETWEEN WATER UTILITIES AND MUNICIPALITIES Lessons learnt from Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, OECD 2011 PPP and Performance Based Contracts
Alloca on of public/private responsibili es across different forms of PBCs in water services
GUIDELINES FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED CONTRACTS BETWEEN WATER UTILITIES AND MUNICIPALITIES Lessons learnt from Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, ENV/EPOC/EAP(2010)4 PPP and Performance Based Contracts
Roles’ alloca on between Public & Private partners (Kanakoudis et al., 2005 )
Risks and their distribu on (Kanakoudis et al., 2005 ) PPP and Performance Based Contracts
q The first PPPs in in Greece Greece were the Summary of PPP projects of ULEN & ac vity in Europe POWER (construc on by country/sector and ini al opera on of the water distribu on system of Athens & the na onal distribu on network of electricity respec vely. q PPP projects in Greece are being implemented in the environmental sector (integrated systems of waste management & construc on of sanita on networks and of sewage treatment plants). Administra ve Reforma on in Greece RBD Consulta on Dates RBMP Adop on Status Greece has 14 river basin Western Peloponnese (GR01) 21/11/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 08/04/2013 districts, out of which 5 Northern Peloponnese (GR02) 21/11/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 08/04/2013 are interna onal sharing Eastern Peloponnese (GR03) 21/11/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 08/04/2013 water recourses with Western Sterea Ellada (GR04) 15/10/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 18/09/2014 Albania, FYROM and Epirus (GR05) 15/10/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 04/09/2013 Bulgaria to the north and A ca (GR 06) 13/01/2012 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 08/04/2013 Turkey to the east Eastern Sterea Ellada (GR 07) 13/01/2012 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 08/04/2013 Thessaly (GR08) 13/01/2012 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 18/09/2014 Western Macedonia (GR09) 30/07/2012 – 13/12/2013 Adopted on 30/01/2014 2nd RBMPs (2016-2021) Central Macedonia (GR10) 30/07/2012 – 13/12/2013 Adopted on 30/01/2014 The 2nd RBMPs have not Eastern Macedonia (GR 11) 18/11/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 04/09/2013 yet been adopted. Thrace (GR12) 18/11/2011 – 21/11/2012 Adopted on 04/09/2013 1st RBMPs (2009-2015) Crete (GR13) 11/07/2013 – 27/02/2015 Adopted on 31/03/2015 EC assessment of the River Aegean Islands (GR14) 30/05/2014 – 26/06/2015 Adopted on 17/09/2015 Basin Management Plans was reported in March 2015
Administra ve Reforma on in Greece In Greece we should:
Urgently adopt and report to the Commission the two outstanding Greek RBMPs
Improve trans boundary coopera on, building on the progress achieved so far; addi onal efforts in the context of WFD-implementa on are needed, so that the second RBMPs for interna onal RBDs are developed in close coopera on with neighbouring countries
Make fully opera onal the new Na onal Monitoring Programme (NMP)
All water bodies should be classified according to WFD compliant methods. Data must be collected on a regular basis for all relevant quality elements
Develop publicly available WFD compliant Na onal Guidance Documents, addressing the key implementa on steps where significant weaknesses have been iden fied, necessary to ensure WFD compliance and increased comparability and transparency
Ensure in the updated RBMPs a be er understanding and iden fica on of the main risks and pressures in each river basin, based on detailed harmonised methodologies Administra ve Reforma on in Greece ...We should also: No clear link between measures and status assessment is made Meaningful informa on regarding the scope, the ming and the funding of the measures should be included in the PoM so the approach to achieve the objec ves is clear and the ambi on in the PoM is transparent
PoM in RBMPs: the limited level of ambi on, and lack of clarity regarding expected effects, need to be rec fied. The PoM includes mostly administra ve acts that may not make a difference (par cularly if implementa on is not enforced) Develop fully the economic analysis of water use (including the polluter pays principle, including a clear defini on of water services, harmonising methodologies and data in all RBMPs) and ensure that the water tariffs/fees lead to adequate recovery of the costs of water services Up to now, there is no considera on of climate change - no “climate proofing” of the RBMP/ PoMs
The Drought Management Plans (DMP) developed as supplementary to the RBMPs are a valuable addi on.. Report on the implementa on of the Water Framework Direc ve River Basin Management Plans, SWD(2015) 54 final Administra ve Reforma on in Greece Basic Reforms:
Long-term capacity and expertise building should be ensured in the water administration, based on sufficient resources and personnel available at all relevant administrative levels
Report on the implementa on of the Water Framework Direc ve River Basin Management Plans, SWD(2015) 54 final Coopera on Opportuni es
13 countries : ENI CBC MEDITERRANEAN Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, SEA BASIN PROGRAMME Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Pales ne, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia
The call for proposals will be launched soon... Greek experience with water management under water scarcity, with emphasis on islands
Nicholas Petroulias, Chairman of Hellenic Water Associa on Greece
14 Dec, 2016