DOCSLIB.ORG

The Uk's Leading Immigration Barrister Law Firm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Uk's Leading Immigration Barrister Law Firm THE UK’S LEADING IMMIGRATION BARRISTER LAW FIRM Tel: +44(0)203 617 9173 Fax: +44(0)203 004 1611 Email: [email protected] www.richmondchambers.com WHY CHOOSE US? WHAT WE DO contents We’ve helped scores of individuals and Our multi-award winning immigration Why choose us? 03 …with Richmond businesses obtain visas for the UK and/or barristers provide expert legal advice and challenge Home Office immigration decisions. representation, directly to individuals and What we do 03 Chambers you get real Our immigration barristers bring years of businesses, in relation to all aspects of UK Investment migration 04 barristers who are at the knowledge and experience to the table. immigration law. top of their profession Family migration 05 and understand the We work hard to understand our clients’ plans We assist individuals with the full range of and objectives. Then we put together the right personal immigration matters, from preparing EEA nationals and family 06 legal system very well. We would highly team, with the right mix of skills, languages and visa applications to enter and remain in the UK, Work visas 07 experience, to help our clients get to where to providing representation at appeals before recommend them. they want to be as easily and cost-effectively the immigration tribunal and higher courts. Short stay visas 08 as possible. Ehab Shouly Study visas 09 Our immigration barristers provide We combine the We’re obsessed with excellence and clear business decision makers with a range of Settlement in the UK 10 expertise and quality communication is vital to what we do. Our business immigration services, from of the Bar, with the barristers work closely with our clients, to make preparing sponsor licence applications, to British citizenship 11 service levels of sure that they always know what’s going on and visa applications for employees and advice on Human rights and refugee protection 12 a trusted law firm. that everything is delivered on time. compliance management. Sponsor licensing 13 Our barristers are passionate about Our approach is distinctly innovative. Working Sponsor compliance 14 immigration law and bring enthusiasm and directly with our clients, we combine the commitment to every case they work on. We expertise and quality of the Bar with the service care about our clients and always go the extra levels of a trusted law firm. mile to ensure that everything is ‘just right’. 2 3 INVESTMENT MIGRATION Not only did they get The service provided was FAMILY MIGRATION us the result needed outstanding in all areas: (Tier 1 extension), but expertise, organization, Richmond Chambers is widely recognised as Our investment migration team works closely RECENT WORK HIGHLIGHTS: the results were based speed of response to Our immigration barristers regularly assist RECENT WORK HIGHLIGHTS: one of the UK’s leading immigration practices with investors, wealth managers and leading on a thorough and very our questions, support foreign national spouses, civil partners, for investors and entrepreneurs. We were banks to prepare and submit high quality visa • Our barristers assisted a high net worth structured methodology. and management of our unmarried partners, fiancé(e)s, proposed • Our immigration barristers assisted a awarded ‘Business Immigration Chambers of applications for investors and their families. citizen of China to relocate to the UK by We felt informed and case from start to finish. civil partners, children and adult dependent citizen of the Philippines and her daughter the Year in England’ at the 2018 Corporate preparing a successful application for a relatives to relocate to, and settle in, the to ensure that their spouse and child visa Our team of immigration barristers is confident throughout Highly recommended. Intl Magazine Global Awards, ‘UK Business UK Tier 1 (Investor) visa. UK with their British citizen or settled applications were approved. also experienced in assisting all types of the process. Immigration Barrister of the Year’ at the Mark Wallace family members. entrepreneurs. Whether you are considering • We assisted a family from Russia to • Richmond Chambers successfully ACQ5 Law Awards 2018 and ‘Business Hatem Dowidar setting up and running a new business in Immigration Set of the Year’ at the Global Law extend their stay in the UK under the Whether you require expert advice on the represented a citizen of Pakistan in her the UK or looking to invest in an established Experts Awards 2017. Tier 1 (Investor) visa route using UKVI’s requirements of the Immigration Rules, an appeal against a decision of the Home business, our barristers are experts in the Super Premium Service. independent assessment of your prospects Office to refuse her unmarried partner Our work on behalf of investors and immigration options for entrepreneurs and of qualifying for a family visa or professional visa application. entrepreneurs has also been recognised through can guide you through the complex Home • Our investment migration team worked assistance with preparing a family visa membership of the Investment Migration Office rules and policies. with a businessperson from the UAE to application or appeal, our immigration • Our family migration team were Council and the Department of International secure a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) visa to set barristers can help. successful in overturning two decisions Trade’s Investor Support Network. up and run a business in the UK. of the Home Office to refuse to grant Adult Dependent Relative visas to our • Our immigration barristers used Indian clients. Administrative Review proceedings to successfully overturn a Home Office finding that our Bangladeshi client was not a genuine entrepreneur. 4 5 EEA NATIONALS AND FAMILY Richmond Chambers As an employer, I decided WORK VISAS was incredibly to use Richmond professional and Chamber’s services Our immigration barristers have assisted RECENT WORK HIGHLIGHTS: supportive from start to apply for a visa Our team of business immigration barristers RECENT WORK HIGHLIGHTS: scores of EEA nationals and their family to finish, helping me extension for one of our has experience in assisting employers and members to exercise their rights of free • The EEA team at Richmond Chambers understand the UK key employees. I found skilled workers across a variety of industries • Our immigration barristers assisted the movement in the UK. assisted a citizen of the US to obtain an requirements for EEA their approach to be and in companies of all sizes. Director of a fashion design company to EEA Family Permit based on her durable relocate to the UK on a Tier 2 (General) visa. From applying for EEA Family Permits to enter Family permits, advise consistently confident From skilled workers looking to take up new relationship with a Polish national. the UK, to obtaining documents from the on the supporting and unflappable, opportunities in the UK, to employees of • We assisted a senior employee of a major Home Office to confirm a right of residence • Our specialist EEA barristers assisted the documentation responding to queries multinational companies transfering to a UK chemical manufacturing company in or permanent residence, we understand the partner of an EEA national to overturn a needed, and review and acknowledging branch and senior employees of overseas Pakistan to obtain a Sole Representative complexities of the EEA Regulations and bring determination of the First tier Tribunal my application before receipt of documents businesses seeking to establish a UK branch of an Overseas Business visa. an in-depth knowledge of both domestic and that his marriage was one of convenience. submission. quickly and efficiently.... or subsidiary, we can help ensure that your international case-law. career progresses in full compliance with UK • Our immigration barristers assisted • Our barristers helped a dependent a senior client manager for a global Katherine Michonski Care4U Pharmacy Ltd immigration law. Whether you require expert advice on the descendant over 21 submit a fresh software distribution company to requirements of the EEA Regulations, an application to secure a Permanent Whether you require expert advice on your relocate to the UK with a Tier 2 (Intra independent assessment of your prospects Residence Card. work visa options under the UK’s Immigration Company Transfer) visa. of qualifying for an EEA residence document Rules, an independent assessment of your or professional assistance with preparing an • We won an appeal against a decision of prospects of qualifying for a work visa or • Richmond Chambers assisted a theatre EEA residence card application or appeal, our the Home Office to refuse to issue an EEA professional assistance with preparing a work actor to obtain a Tier 1 (Exceptional immigration barristers can help. Permanent Residence Card on the basis visa application or review, our immigration Promise) endorsement. of self-employment. barristers can help. 6 7 SHORT STAY VISAS Superb knowledge and Professional and STUDY VISAS professional service detailed. Richmond – simply excellent. Chambers has a way of Our immigration barristers are experienced in RECENT WORK HIGHLIGHTS: Richmond Chambers making you feel at ease Our immigration barristers regularly RECENT WORK HIGHLIGHTS: assisting with all types of visit visa applications. provides outstanding and confident about assist international students to move to, • Our barristers assisted two US dancers or extend their stay in, the UK in order to • We represented a citizen of Nigeria Whether you are considering travelling to the to give a paid performance in the UK by service and their your immigration status. pursue their education. in his application for entry clearance UK for a holiday, to visit friends and family, successfully applying for Permitted Paid knowledge of the UK Their thoroughness as a Tier 4 (General) migrant to to undertake a business trip or short paid If you are over the age of 16 and have been Engagement visas. complete an MSc in Computer Science engagement, to get married or to receive immigration process and and professionalism is offered an unconditional place on a course at Middlesex University.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mauritius's Constitution of 1968 with Amendments Through 2016
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 constituteproject.org Mauritius's Constitution of 1968 with Amendments through 2016 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:39 Table of contents CHAPTER I: THE STATE AND THE CONSTITUTION . 7 1. The State . 7 2. Constitution is supreme law . 7 CHAPTER II: PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL . 7 3. Fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual . 7 4. Protection of right to life . 7 5. Protection of right to personal liberty . 8 6. Protection from slavery and forced labour . 10 7. Protection from inhuman treatment . 11 8. Protection from deprivation of property . 11 9. Protection for privacy of home and other property . 14 10. Provisions to secure protection of law . 15 11. Protection of freedom of conscience . 17 12. Protection of freedom of expression . 17 13. Protection of freedom of assembly and association . 18 14. Protection of freedom to establish schools . 18 15. Protection of freedom of movement . 19 16. Protection from discrimination . 20 17. Enforcement of protective provisions . 21 17A. Payment or retiring allowances to Members . 22 18. Derogations from fundamental rights and freedoms under emergency powers . 22 19. Interpretation and savings . 23 CHAPTER III: CITIZENSHIP . 25 20. Persons who became citizens on 12 March 1968 . 25 21. Persons entitled to be registered as citizens . 25 22. Persons born in Mauritius after 11 March 1968 . 26 23. Persons born outside Mauritius after 11 March 1968 .
    [Show full text]
  • Pupillage: What to Expect
    PUPILLAGE: WHAT TO EXPECT WHAT IS IT? Pupillage is the Work-based Learning Component of becoming a barrister. It is a 12- 18 month practical training period which follows completion of the Bar Course. It is akin to an apprenticeship, in which you put into practise everything you have learned in your vocational studies whilst under the supervision of an experienced barrister. Almost all pupillages are found in sets of barristers’ chambers. However, there are a handful of pupillages at the ‘employed bar’, which involves being employed and working as a barrister in-house for a company, firm, charity or public agency, such as the Crown Prosecution Service. STRUCTURE Regardless of where you undertake your pupillage, the training is typically broken down into two (sometimes three) distinct parts or ‘sixes’. First Six First six is the informal name given to the first six months of pupillage. It is often referred to as the non-practising stage as you are not yet practising as a barrister in your own right. The majority of your time in first six will be spent attending court and conferences with your pupil supervisor, who will be an experienced barrister from your chambers. In a busy criminal set, you will be in court almost every day (unlike your peers in commercial chambers). In addition to attending court, you will assist your supervisor with preparation for court which may include conducting legal research and drafting documents such as advices, applications or skeleton arguments (a written document provided to the court in advance of a hearing). During first six you will be required to attend a compulsory advocacy training course with your Inn of Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inns of Court and the Impact on the Legal Profession in England
    SMU Law Review Volume 4 Issue 4 Article 2 1950 The Inns of Court and the Impact on the Legal Profession in England David Maxwell-Fyfe Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation David Maxwell-Fyfe, The Inns of Court and the Impact on the Legal Profession in England, 4 SW L.J. 391 (1950) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol4/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. 19501 THE INNS OF COURT THE INNS OF COURT AND THE IMPACT ON THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN ENGLAND The Rt. Hon. Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe, K.C., M.P., London, England A TTHE present day there are many eminent lawyers who have received a part, perhaps the greater part, of their legal grounding at Oxford or Cambridge or other universities, but there was a time when no legal teaching of any consequence, except in Canon and Roman law, was obtainable anywhere outside the Inns of Court. Sir Wm. Blackstone called them "Our Judicial Univer- sity." In them were taught and trained the barristers and the judges who molded and developed the common law and the principles of equity. The Inns were not in earlier times, as they are now, inhabited merely during the daytime by lawyers and students who dispersed in all directions to their homes every night.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Legal Rights
    Chapter I1 "And Justice I Shall Have": Women and Legal Rights New Brunswickfollowed theEnglishlegal so displacing the legal heritage of the other non-British groups in the province: the aboriginal peoples, the reestablished Acadians and other immigrants of European origin, such as the Germans. Like all law, English common law reflected attitudes towards women which were narrow and riddled with misconceptions and prejudices. As those attitudes slowly changed, so did the law.' Common law evolves in two ways: through case law and through statute law. Case law evolves as judges interpret the law; their written decisions form precedents by which to decide future disputes. Statute law, or acts of legislation, change as lawmakers rewrite legislation, often as a result of a change in public opinion. Judges in turn interpret these new statutes, furthering the evolution of the law. Women's legal rights are therefore much dependent on the attitudes of judges, legislators and society. Since early New Brunswick, legal opinion has reflected women's restricted place in society in general and women's highly restricted place in society when mamed. Single women In New Brunswick, as in the rest of Canada, single women have always enjoyed many of the samelegal rights as men. They could always own and manage property in their own name, enter into contracts and own and operate their own businesses. Their civic rights were limited, although less so at times than for married women. However, in spite of their many legal freedoms not sharedby their married sisters, single women were still subject to society's limited views regarding women's capabilities, potential and place.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Immigration, Legal Aid Funding Reform and Caseworkers
    Deborah James and Evan Kilick Ethical dilemmas? UK immigration, Legal Aid funding reform and caseworkers Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: James, Deborah and Killick, Evan (2010) Ethical dilemmas? UK immigration, Legal Aid funding reform and caseworkers. Anthropology today, 26 (1). pp. 13-16. DOI: 10.3366/E0001972009000709 © 2009 Deborah James This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21396/ Available in LSE Research Online: February 2011 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Ethical dilemmas? UK immigration, legal aid funding reform and case workers Evan Killick and Deborah James Anthropology Today 26(1):13-15. Anthropologists have an abiding concern with migrants’ transnational movement. Such concern confronts us with some sharp ethical dilemmas.1 Anthropologists have been intensely critical of the forms of law applied to both asylum seekers and potential immigrants, drawing attention to its ‘patchy’ and ‘paradoxical’ character (Andersson 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • “Clean Hands” Doctrine
    Announcing the “Clean Hands” Doctrine T. Leigh Anenson, J.D., LL.M, Ph.D.* This Article offers an analysis of the “clean hands” doctrine (unclean hands), a defense that traditionally bars the equitable relief otherwise available in litigation. The doctrine spans every conceivable controversy and effectively eliminates rights. A number of state and federal courts no longer restrict unclean hands to equitable remedies or preserve the substantive version of the defense. It has also been assimilated into statutory law. The defense is additionally reproducing and multiplying into more distinctive doctrines, thus magnifying its impact. Despite its approval in the courts, the equitable defense of unclean hands has been largely disregarded or simply disparaged since the last century. Prior research on unclean hands divided the defense into topical areas of the law. Consistent with this approach, the conclusion reached was that it lacked cohesion and shared properties. This study sees things differently. It offers a common language to help avoid compartmentalization along with a unified framework to provide a more precise way of understanding the defense. Advancing an overarching theory and structure of the defense should better clarify not only when the doctrine should be allowed, but also why it may be applied differently in different circumstances. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1829 I. PHILOSOPHY OF EQUITY AND UNCLEAN HANDS ...................... 1837 * Copyright © 2018 T. Leigh Anenson. Professor of Business Law, University of Maryland; Associate Director, Center for the Study of Business Ethics, Regulation, and Crime; Of Counsel, Reminger Co., L.P.A; [email protected]. Thanks to the participants in the Discussion Group on the Law of Equity at the 2017 Southeastern Association of Law Schools Annual Conference, the 2017 International Academy of Legal Studies in Business Annual Conference, and the 2018 Pacific Southwest Academy of Legal Studies in Business Annual Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • William & Mary Law Library
    WILLIAM & MARY LAW LIBRARY FIRST DAY SECTION ONE VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS Norfclk, Virginia - February 24,2004 WrZte your answer to Questions 1 and 2 in Answer Booklet A - (the WHiTE booklet) 1. While Cameron was visiting her grandmother ("Grandmother") in Roanoke, Virginia, Grandmother showed her three valuable silver cups, nhich had been in their family since the nineteenth century. Each cup was inscribed with the family's last name and bore the respective birth year (1 880, 1885, and 1890) of Cameron's great grandfather and his two brothers. As Cameron admired the cups, Grandmother said, "Cameron, I want you to have the i 890 cup, so take it with you. The 188.5 cup is for your sister: Sofia, in New York. I'm giving it to you to take to her. I intend to give the 1880 cup to your brother, Jackson, who is coming here to see me next week." Cameron thanked Grandmother and took the 1885 and 1890 cups as requested. In a rush to catch her flight at the Roanoke Airport, Cameron inadvertently left the 188.5 silver cup in the back seat pocket of the taxicab she had taken to the airport. Driver, who was an employee of the taxi company, found the silver cup as he was cleaning out the taxi at the end of his shift. Driver told Taxi Owner, who owned the taxi and the taxi company, that he had found the silver cup and that he was going to keep it for himself. Taxi Owner, i/ thinking he recognized the cup, took it from Driver and, over the objection of Driver, ~eturneclit to \.- Grandmother.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law, Informal and Putative Marriage
    COMMON LAW, INFORMAL, AND PUTATIVE MARRIAGE STEPHEN J. NAYLOR The Law Office of Stephen J. Naylor P.L.L.C. 5201 West Freeway, Suite 102 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 (817) 735-1305 Telephone (817) 735-9071 Facsimile [email protected] CHRIS H. NEGEM Law Offices of Chris H. Negem Energy Plaza, Suite 105 8620 North New Braunfels San Antonio, Texas 78217 (210) 226-1200 Telephone (210) 798-2654 Facsimile [email protected] State Bar of Texas 36TH ANNUAL MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION INSTITUTE April 18-19, 2013 Galveston CHAPTER 5 STEPHEN J. NAYLOR Law Office Of Stephen J. Naylor, P.L.L.C. 5201 West Freeway, Suite 102 Fort Worth, TX 76107 Telephone: (817) 735-1305 Facsimile: (817) 735-9071 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION: Texas Tech University School of Law J.D. May 1994 Student Senator Officer - Christian Legal Society Officer - Criminal Trial Lawyers Association Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award in Trial Advocacy Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award in Products Liability Texas Tech University B.B.A. in Management, (summa cum laude) 1990 Beta Gamma Sigma Honor Society President's Honor List Dean's Honor List AREAS OF PRACTICE: Board Certified-Family Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES: State Bar Of Texas State Bar Of Texas Family Law Section Tarrant County Bar Association Tarrant County Family Law Bar Association Eldon B. Mahon Inn of Court - Barrister (1999-2002, 2008-2009) Pro Bono Committee, State Bar of Texas Family Law Section 2005 to present Co-Chairman, Pro Bono Committee, State Bar of Texas Family
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer at the Police Station Door: How REPLACE Provides Legal Aid in Nigeria Introduction
    Lawyer at the Police Station Door: How REPLACE Provides Legal Aid in Nigeria Introduction In Nigeria’s jails, around seven out of every ten prisoners have not been convicted. They are in pretrial detention, waiting for a trial date—a wait that can stretch from days to months to years in some cases. Most are too poor to afford “the three B’s” of Nigeria’s criminal justice system: bail, bribe, or barrister. Many of these pretrial detainees are held over minor offences that should allow them to be released pending trial. Others will languish behind bars for long periods of time before fi nally being tried and found innocent. Nigeria’s offi cial legal aid scheme offers some help, but it is woefully underfunded and understaffed. The result is an excessive use of pretrial detention that wastes human lives and perverts and undermines Nigeria’s criminal justice system. In 2004, Nigeria’s Legal Aid Council and the Open Society Justice Initiative began a joint project to address the overuse of pretrial detention. In 2006, Nigeria’s Rights Enforcement and Public Law Centre (REPLACE) became the main implementing Pretrial Justice in Nigeria: partner for the project, which set out to demonstrate that things can be different. The central element of the project, the Police Duty Solicitors Scheme (PDSS), sought to Dysfunctional System, Broken Lives reduce the excessive use of pretrial detention by providing free legal advice to suspects Nigeria’s criminal justice system comprises a complicated mix of federal, state, and at police stations—the point at which the decision to detain or to release pending trial local authorities, many of which overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Law for Non Law Studentsweb
    Law for Non Law Students Version 8.13 You are advised to check material facts as although every effort has been made to ensure that the information given in this leaflet is up-to-date, reviews of legal education and training requirements are continually in progress and information is subject to change. Qualifications & Courses Do I need an Undergraduate Law degree to practice law? No. To practice as a solicitor or barrister in England and Wales non law graduates must first take a conversion course. Taking the Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL), sometimes called the Common Professional Exam (CPE), recognised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority/Bar Standards Board, will give you the same status as a law graduate. What further courses/training do I need to do to qualify as a solicitor or barrister? Following completion of a recognised GDL/CPE you need to undertake a period of vocational training: ° Legal Practice Course (LPC) to qualify as a solicitor, followed by a two year period of work based learning, known as a training contract, including a Professional Skills course. A profile detailing the work of a solicitor training requirements and career progression is available from www.prospects.ac.uk/types_of_jobs_legal_profession.htm ° Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) to qualify as a barrister, followed by at least 12 months pupillage. A profile detailing the work of a barrister, training requirements and career progression is available from www.prospects.ac.uk/types_of_jobs_legal_profession.htm Are there any other ways to qualify as a lawyer? Yes, becoming a legal executive is recognised by the Ministry of Justice as being one of the three core ways of becoming a lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Marilyn J
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 5 Issue 3 Fall Fall 1983 A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Marilyn J. Berger Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Marilyn J. Berger, A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education, 5 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 540 (1983-1984) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. A Comparative Study of British Barristers and American Legal Practice and Education Mariyn J Berger* I. INTRODUCTION The conduct of a trial in England is undeniably an impressive un- dertaking. Costume alone transports the viewer to Elizabethan time. Counsel and judges, bewigged and gowned,' appear in a cloistered, re- gal setting, strewn with leather-bound books. Brightly colored ribbons of red, green, yellow and white, rather than metal clips and staples fasten the legal papers.2 After comparison with the volatile atmosphere and often unruly conduct of a trial in a United States courtroom, it is natural to assume that the British model of courtroom advocacy pro- * B.S., 1965, Cornell University; J.D., University of California at Berkeley. Associate Profes- sor of Law, University of Puget Sound School of Law. This article is based on the author's obser- vations and interviews while a Visiting Professor of Law at the Polytechnic of the South Bank in London, 1981-82, and a scholar-in-residence at King's College, December-June, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • + + + + 11Mini-Pupillages
    ++ 11 MINI-PUPILLAGES Mini-Pupillages: An Overview What is a Mini-Pupillage? A mini-pupillage, or ‘‘mini’’, is the name given to a short period of time spent undertaking work experience in barristers’ chambers. Occasionally minis are paid and highly structured with a group of mini-pupils receiving talks from members of chambers and attending court in groups. These, however, are rare; most minis will be both unfunded and unstructured. You are likely to be the only mini-pupil in chambers that week and you will probably be assigned to a different barrister each day, sometimes at the last minute, depending on who is available. Some minis are also assessed, usually meaning you will be given a piece of work to do over the course of the week. Experiences can be glamorous and exciting—discussing cross- examination strategy with a QC in a high profile case then watching as it is put into devastating effect—or mundane and uninspiring— sitting at the back of a hot courtroom day after day watching a boring case and having no interaction with anybody. Most often, your experience will be somewhere between these two extremes. You will probably find yourself reading briefs and discussing them with a barrister, sitting in on a client conference or two and perhaps being invited to lunch so you can meet members of chambers. Whatever your experience, one thing is always guaranteed: you will learn something about practice at the Bar. A Former Mini-Pupil ‘‘I did one mini where every single case I went to watch settled. Chambers was keen to remind me that this was far from the general reality of their practice.
    [Show full text]