DOCSLIB.ORG

New Hampshire Forest Resource Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Hampshire Forest Resource Strategies New Hampshire Forest Resource Strategies A Component of the 2010 Forest Resources Plan Division of Forests and Lands Department of Resources and Economic Development in cooperation with the New Hampshire Forest Advisory Board 2010 Table of Contents Overview 1 Introduction 3 History of Forest Resource Planning in New Hampshire 3 USDA Forest Service Requirements 4 The 2010 Forest Resource Planning Process 4 Desired Outcomes 8 2010 Forest Resource Strategies 15 Priority I ­ Conserve New Hampshire’s Forested Landscape 15 Focus Area A ­ Good Forest Stewardship in New Hampshire’s Forests 16 Focus Area B – Enhancing Urban and Community Forestry 33 Focus Area C ­ Sustainable Forest Based Economy 41 Priority II ­ Protect New Hampshire’s Forests from Harm 51 Focus Area A ­ Protect Forest from Threats 51 Focus Area B ­ Maintain Ecosystem Health 56 Focus Area C ­ Response to Forest Damage 60 Priority III ­ Enhance Benefits from New Hampshire’s Trees and Forests 65 Focus Area A ­ Sustaining Economic Benefits from New Hampshire Forests 65 Focus Area B ­ Sustaining Environmental Services from New Hampshire Forests 70 Forest Resource Strategies Matrix 73 State Forestry Programs to support the 2010 New Hampshire Forest Resource Plan 93 Fire 95 Forest Health 101 Forest Legacy 108 Forest Stewardship 109 Urban and Community Forestry 120 Appendix A – NH Forest Legacy Program Summary 130 Appendix B – Public Input Questionnaire 139 Appendix C – Contracted Services for the 2010 Forest Resource Strategies 145 2010 Forest Resource Strategies Overview The New Hampshire Forest Resource Plan – which includes both the Statewide Assessment and Resource Strategy documents ­ is a compilation of the results of the input provided by individuals and groups within the New Hampshire natural resource community and from the public; and review of existing plans and assessments. No sharply divided controversial issues surfaced, apparently the result of the on­going collaboration among the forestry­related people and groups in New Hampshire. There is much common ground, fostered by the open atmosphere, and while there are different perspectives on some issues, the desired outcomes in this plan reflect as much as possible the consensus that was found through the input process. The USDA Forest Service National Priorities have been used as the basis for organizing the plan. The three Priorities are Conserve Working Forest Landscapes: Conserving and managing working forest landscapes for multiple values and uses. Protect Forests from Threats: Protect forests from threats, including catastrophic storms, flooding, insect or disease outbreak, and invasive species. Enhance Public Benefits from Trees and Forests: Including air and water quality, soil conservation, biological diversity, carbon storage, forest products, forestry related jobs, production of renewable energy, and wildlife. Issues presented in the New Hampshire input process are organized under each of the Priorities. Strategies are presented for each of the issues. Some strategies may be found to address more than one issue. Strategies that apply to more than one issue are listed under each appropriate issue. Those strategies, which are presented more than once, are noted with an asterisk (*). The organizations that have been recommended to participate in a strategy are identified in this plan, based upon the results of the participants’ suggestions. A matrix, which summarizes the issues, is included in this document. Each strategy and those groups who are recommended to participate in the implementation of each strategy can be found in the matrix. This provides you an efficient way to view the depth and breadth of the plan and for participants in the implementation to identify their responsibilities. Strategies that are a part of State Forestry Programs are included among the other strategies to address each issue. A separate section provides a more detailed narrative of the State Forestry Program Areas. 1 2 Introduction The New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development, Division of Forests and Lands has developed the New Hampshire Forest Resource Strategies under the guidance of the New Hampshire Forest Advisory Board. History of Forest Resource Planning in New Hampshire Planning is an essential and inescapable part of our lives, whether it is personal, family, career, or business. Every so often, each of us takes stock in where we have been, where we are at the present, and where we think we want to go. This is what planning is all about. The odds are stacked against any achievement of success without reflecting on the past, the present, and the future. Forestry is no different. New Hampshire officially recognized this fact in 1952, when a group of citizens, appointed by former Governor Sherman Adams, conducted the State’s first statewide forest resources planning project. A similar project followed in 1964 under former Governor John King. In 1974, the U.S. Congress gave momentum to forest resources planning with the passage of the Resources Planning Act (RPA). This act provided technical assistance, funding, and coordination to states on a national basis. The RPA process gave New Hampshire the necessary resources to initiate its current Forest Resource Planning Program, by the passage of the New Hampshire Forest Resource Planning Act, RSA 220, in 1981, requiring resource assessments and periodic plans based on those assessments, with five­year updates and reports to the Legislature. RPA and this new law were the impetus for New Hampshire to undertake its third citizen­based planning project, culminating in 1982 with a document “Forests and Forestry in New Hampshire – Action Program for the Eighties”. In 1986, the New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands published an interim report addressing emerging problems and changing opportunities. In 1996 the New Hampshire Forest Resource Planning Act, RSA 220 was recodified to RSA 227­I Forest Resources Education, Promotion, and Planning. At about the same time, New Hampshire began its fourth forest resource planning process, a two­year effort involving representation from the forestry community across the spectrum of interests. It looked at how people valued and used New Hampshire’s forests and the forest's role in our economy, and the ecological condition of our forests. The 11 objectives that were used in the public input questionnaire for this plan came from those assessment reports. In 2002, an Interim Status Report was prepared to update the 1996 Forest Resource Plan. The outcome of that effort was the starting point for the development of this document. Continuing the tradition begun in 1952, the 2010 New Hampshire Forest Resource Strategies presents a set of actions to address the sustainability of New Hampshire’s forests, ecosystems, and a healthy forest­based economy. 3 USDA Forest Service Requirements The 2008 Farm Bill requires States to complete a Statewide Assessment and Resource Strategy in order to receive cooperative forestry assistance funds. In this way, the USDA Forest Service ensures that funds provided to the state will be used for things designated by the people of New Hampshire in a plan. The State of New Hampshire will look to the Forest Service to approve this document so that support through the New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands for plan elements will be possible. Knowing that this process was required and that guidelines for the plan would be forthcoming from the Forest Service, the development of this document the New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands postponed the process beyond the usual 10­year period to accommodate the federal needs. In this way, The Division could meet the state and federal requirements simultaneously, with greater efficiency and with a common purpose. The 2010 Forest Resource Planning Process Public Input New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands contracted with the Natural Resource Institute, LLC (NRI) to gather statewide public input, compile and document the results within the context of New Hampshire Forest Resource Plan tradition and USDA Forest Service standards. The Division of Forests and Lands also had the NRI garner the forestry agency program plans that will address the identified issues. The New Hampshire Forest Advisory Board served as the overseeing body for the development of this document. Susan Francher, Forest Resource Planner, served as the principal person responsible for the production of this document, working with State Forester, Brad Simpkins, Interim Director, New Hampshire Division of Forests and Lands. The Division of Forests and Lands thank the following stakeholder groups for their time discussing the New Hampshire Forest Resource Plan and for their input: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Appalachian Mountain Club Community Forestry Advisory Council Forest Legacy Committee Forest Stewardship Committee GRANIT ­ Complex Systems Granite State Division – Society of American Foresters Harris Center Land Conservation and Heritage Investment Program Land Trusts Natural Resource Conservation Service New Hampshire Arborists Association 4 New Hampshire Association of Conservation Commissions New Hampshire Association of Conservation Districts New Hampshire Audubon New Hampshire Farm Bureau New Hampshire Fire Chiefs Association New Hampshire Forest Advisory Board New Hampshire Landscape Association New Hampshire Sierra Club New Hampshire State Conservation Committee New Hampshire Timber Harvesting Council New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1
    CK-12 FOUNDATION Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 Akre CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high-quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright © 2010 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/Share Alike 3.0 Un- ported (CC-by-NC-SA) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Commons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. Specific details can be found at http://about.ck12.org/terms. Printed: October 11, 2010 Author Barbara Akre Contributor Jean Battinieri i www.ck12.org Contents 1 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 1 1.1 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis ............................... 1 1.2 Lesson 18.2: Natural Resources .................................. 32 2 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part I 49 2.1 Chapter 18: Ecology and Human Actions ............................ 49 2.2 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis ............................... 49 2.3 Lesson 18.2: Natural Resources .................................. 53 www.ck12.org ii Chapter 1 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 1.1 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis Lesson Objectives • Compare humans to other species in terms of resource needs and use, and ecosystem service benefits and effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources, Spring 1999
    NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION TASK FORCE REPORT PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The views expressed in this report are those of the Task Force members and were not the subject of endorsement by the full Council. Many of the federal officials who serve on the Council also serve on the Council’s Task Forces and participated actively in developing the Task Force’s recommendations, but those recommendations do not necessarily reflect Administration policy. PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TASK-FORCE-REPORT-ON-NATURAL RESOURCES To obtain copies of this Report, please contact: President’s Council on Sustainable Development 730 Jackson Place, NW Washington, D.C. 20503 1-800-363-3732 (202) 408-5296 Website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/PCSD TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP CO-CHAIRS Richard Barth, Chairman, President, and CEO, Ciba-Geigy Corporation James R. Lyons, Undersecretary for Natural Resources and the Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture Theodore Strong, Executive Director, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission MEMBERS Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior James Baker, Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Carol Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A.D. Correll, Chairman and CEO, Georgia-Pacific Corporation Fred D. Krupp, Executive Director, Environmental Defense Fund Michele Perrault, International Vice President, Sierra Club John C. Sawhill, President and CEO, The Nature Conservancy PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TASK-FORCE-REPORT-ON-NATURAL RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ii INTRODUCTION. 1 CHAPTER 1:TASK FORCE APPROACH. 5 The Role of the Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2015 Vol. 34 No. 1
    New Hampshire Bird Records Spring 2015 Vol. 34, No. 1 IN HONOR OF David Donsker his issue of New Hampshire TBird Records with its color NEW HAMPSHIRE BIRD RECORDS cover is sponsored by friends of VOLUME 34, NUMBER 1 David Donsker in honor of his SPRING 2015 well-deserved receipt of the 2015 MANAGING EDITOR Goodhue-Elkins Award (see page Rebecca Suomala 2) and his many contributions 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] to New Hampshire Bird Records. Congratulations, David! TEXT EDITOR Dan Hubbard David Donsker birding in Monaco. Photo by Terri Donsker. SEASON EDITORS Eric Masterson, Spring Tony Vazzano, Summer Lauren Kras/Ben Griffith, Fall Pamela Hunt, Winter In This Issue LAYOUT From the Editor ........................................................................................................................1 Kathy McBride Photo Quiz ...............................................................................................................................1 ASSISTANTS 2015 Goodhue-Elkins Award – David Donsker ........................................................................2 Jeannine Ayer, Zeke Cornell, David Deifik, Spring Season: March 1 through May 31, 2015 ........................................................................3 Kathryn Frieden, Elizabeth Levy, by Eric Masterson Susan MacLeod, Marie Nickerson, Field Trip Reports Carol Plato, Tony Vazzano, Phyllis Yaffie Dancing Woodcocks by Brynlee Kimball .........................................................................26 FIELD NOTES Connecticut River
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Report Table of Contents
    Division of Parks and Recreation Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Report Table of Contents DIRECTor’s MessaGE Pg. 2 DIVISION MISSION Pg. 5 BUREAU OF HISTORIC SITES Pg. 6 BUREAU OF PARK OPERATIONS Pg. 8 Mount Washington State Park Pg. 9 South/Seacoast Region Pg. 10 Central Region Pg. 11 Great North Woods Management Area Pg. 12 Office of Planning and Development Pg. 13 FRANCONIA NOTCH STATE PARK / CANNON MOUNTAIN SKI AREA Pg. 16 BUREAU OF TRAILS Pg. 17 FINANCE AND ENTERPRISE FUNCTIONS Pg. 18 Audit Response Action Plan Pg. 18 Camping Reservations and Guest Service Pg. 19 OFFICE OF RETAIL OPERATIONS Pg. 20 OFFICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION AND OUTREACH Pg. 21 Land and Water Conservation Fund Program Pg. 23 APPENDIX: Legislative Report Pg. 24 NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION | FISCAL YEAR 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Director’s Message DIRECTor’s MessaGE - ANNUAL REPORt 07/01/2009 – 06/30/2010 Four major events happened in the Division during this time period: 1. The Division of Parks and Recreation 75th Anniversary, celebrating the state’s dedication to the preservation of state lands; 2. The Ten-Year Strategic Development and Capital Improvement Plan was approved and published; 3. The $14.5 million Hampton Beach Redevelopment Project was approved for capital funding by the state legislature; and 4. $3,065,000 was also approved for the Mittersill Expansion at Cannon Mountain. Celebrating 75 Years of New Hampshire State Parks 2010 celebrates the 75th Anniversary of the Division of Parks and Recreation and the state’s dedication to the preservation of state lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Bay Land Access
    Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve N.H. Coastal Program Chambers of Commerce N.H. Fish and Game, Concord N.H. Fish and Game, Durham Office of Travel and Tourism, Concord Seacoast office, Rye For state park accessibility information, please visit the at a Glance Exeter Dover Hampton Portsmouth at Great Bay Discovery Center, Greenland ...................................................................... ...................................................................... 235.38 235.38 miles of estuarine shoreline The New Hampshire coast includes: 18.57 18.57 miles of For information on town and private sites, ................................................................ link at: IN ............................................................. or call the state park of your choice. Public please contact the facility directly. State Park Information iking F NEW HAMPSHIRE www.nhstateparks.org/ParksPages/parks.html R OR S H ocky shorelines ................................................ S ............................................... andy beaches S alt marshes oating T atching and dunes idepools ishing B A ma W F tlantic shoreline icnicking Access ................................. ................................. P wimming ird S T Coastal Access Map B I ................... ON Great Great Bay Discovery Greenland,Center, N.H. ........ Photo: Accessibility 778-0015 559-1500 772-2411 742-2218 926-8717 436-3988 271-2225 868-1095 271-2665 436-1552 New Hampshire GREAT BAY PUBLIC ACCESS SITES GREAT BAY LAND ACCESS Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Water Demand Management, Natural Resource Reconstruction and Traditional Value Systems: a Case Study from Yemen
    WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT, NATURAL RESOURCE RECONSTRUCTION AND TRADITIONAL VALUE SYSTEMS: A CASE STUDY FROM YEMEN Occasional Paper No. 14 Water Issues Study Group School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University of London By G. LichtenthŠler & A.R. Turton gl3&soas.ac.uk & [email protected] INTRODUCTION: Previous research has shown that under conditions of extreme water scarcity, such as in the Middle East, natural resource reconstruction can take place (Allen & Karshenas, 1996). This may not always be the case however, as certain societies seem better able to cope with this process than others. This phenomenon has been linked to the adaptive capacity of a society (Turton, 1999) where it has been shown that all social entities are not equally endowed. A shortage of adaptive capacity has been redefined as a second- order scarcity (Ohlsson, 1998; 1999). What is currently being regarded by most researchers as a manifestation of resource scarcity is in fact probably the result of a second-order scarcity of social resources, which impacts in turn on the way that social entities deal with the first order scarcity of a natural resource such as water. In terms of this thinking, a shift in emphasis to second-order scarcities would be appropriate. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that in a society where resource capture is being actively pursued, natural resource reconstruction is unlikely to occur because it reduces the overall legitimacy of the political system (Turton, 1999). A study of these aspects in Yemen (LichtenthŠler, 1999) is therefore considered to be extremely fruitful because of four fundamental reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimize and Protect Your Natural Resources
    Get involved with EQIP The EQIP application process is continuous throughout the year. Information and applications Optimize can be obtained at any local NRCS Field Office. To find out if EQIP is a perfect fit for your operation, contact your local NRCS office at a and protect USDA Service Center in your area or click on to www.wa.nrcs.usda.gov. your natural Application Process The EQIP application process consists of the resources... EQIP can help producers improve irrigation water following five steps: efficiency. water that is lost to the field. 1. A landowner submits an application to In order to improve the application of water a local USDA Service Center, NRCS and make it more uniform, sprinkler irrigation office, or conservation district office. systems are cost-shared and installed. These 2. NRCS ranks each application using the systems apply water to the plant when needed locally developed natural resources at a rate the soil can manage. There is no deep ranking process. percolation or runoff with the sprinkler irrigation 3. When funds are allocated, NRCS system. What this means is a better use of the commits funds to high ranking resources; water, power, fertilizer, and chemicals applications. which equals better quality crops. 4. NRCS works with the applicant to develop an EQIP conservation plan and Irrigation Water Management contract containing practices which will With the installation of new irrigation solve identified resource problems. systems, landowners need to learn how and when 5. Following contract signature by to apply water. For most of the new systems it NRCS and the selected entity, funds is possible to apply water almost anytime it is are obligated to the project and the needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Economics - Jason F
    ECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES – Vol. II - Natural Resource Economics - Jason F. Shogren NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS Jason F. Shogren University of Wyoming, Laramie, USA Keywords: natural resource, natural resource economics, non-renewable resource, renewable resource, biodiversity, non-market valuation Contents 1. Introduction 2. Non-renewable Resources 2.1 Optimal Depletion 2.2 Resource Scarcity 2.3 Energy 3. Renewable Resources 3.1 Fisheries (or Groundwater) 3.2 Forests 3.3 Commons and Property Rights 3.4 Regulation and Incentives 4. Protecting Biodiversity 5. Climate Protection 6. Non-market Valuation 7. Concluding Comments Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Natural resource economics examines how society can more efficiently use its scarce natural resources, both non-renewable resources, such as minerals and fossil fuels, and renewable resources, such as fisheries and forests. Theory and empirical research explores alternative models on how people and societies choose to use and manage their limited resources. For non-renewable resources, natural resource economics suggests that theUNESCO efficient path to extract such resources – EOLSS over time is to balance the market price with both the marginal extraction costs and the opportunity cost, or shadow price of extracting the resource sooner rather than later. This shadow price is also called the user cost, resourceSAMPLE royalty, or scarcity rent. User CHAPTERS costs capture the idea that there is an additional cost for extracting a resource today since it cannot be extracted tomorrow. Theory also suggests the scarcity rent should grow at a rate equal to the rate of interest. This is called Hotelling’s rule, which says that a unit of resource extracted in any period should yield the same rent, in present value terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington's Natural Resources Management Plan
    ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Natural Resources Management Plan AN ELEMENT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED November 13, 2010 State Champion Post Oak Natural Resources Management Plan November 2010 Arlington County Board Jay Fisette, Chairman, Christopher Zimmerman, Vice-Chairman, and Members Barbara A. Favola, Mary Hughes Hynes and J. Walter Tejada Barbara M. Donnellan, County Manager Dinesh Tiwari, Director, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Caroline Temmermand, Division Chief, Parks and Natural Resources Division The Natural Resources Management Plan was prepared by Greg Zell, Natural Resource Specialist, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources, Parks and Natural Resources Division, Conservation and Interpretation Section. The following individuals provided assistance in the development of the Natural Resources Management Plan: Jamie Bartalon, Landscape and Forestry Section Supervisor; Larry Finch, Chairman, Urban Forestry Commission; Mary Ann Lawler, Urban Forestry Commission; Steve Campbell, Urban Forestry Commission; Dean Amel, Environment and Energy Conservation Commission; Shannon Cunniff, Chairman, Environment and Energy Conservation Commission; Caroline Haynes, Park and Recreation Commission, and Jim Olivetti, Park and Recreation Commission. Front Cover Photo Credits: John White, Gary Fleming, Greg Zell, and the Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing & Development. Other report photos by Greg Zell, unless otherwise indicated. Map Credits: Arlington County Department
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Vol. 30 No. 2
    V30 N2-Summer-11_v4 3/22/12 8:09 AM Page i New Hampshire Bird Records Summer 2011 Vol. 30, No. 2 V30 N2-Summer-11_v4 3/22/12 8:09 AM Page ii AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE New Hampshire Bird Records Volume 30, Number 2 Summer 2011 Managing Editor: Rebecca Suomala 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] Text Editor: Dan Hubbard Season Editors: Eric Masterson/ Lauren Kras/ Ben Griffith, Spring; Tony Vazzano, Summer; Pamela Hunt, Winter Layout: Kathy McBride Assistants: Jeannine Ayer, David Deifik, Dave Howe, Margot Johnson, Elizabeth Levy, Susan MacLeod, Marie Nickerson, Carol Plato, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano Field Notes: Robert A. Quinn Photo Quiz: David Donsker Photo Editor: Len Medlock Web Master: Len Medlock Where to Bird: Phil Brown Editorial Team: Phil Brown, Hank Chary, David Deifik, David Donsker, Ben Griffith, Dan Hubbard, Pam Hunt, Lauren Kras, Iain MacLeod, Len Medlock, Robert A. Quinn, Rebecca Suomala, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano, Jon Woolf Cover Photo: Northern Parula by Jason Lambert. We chose this species for the cover because it was Rozzie Holt’s (see Memorial on page 1) favorite. New Hampshire Bird Records is published quarterly by New Hampshire Audubon’s Conservation Department. Thank you to the many observers who submit their sightings to NH eBird (www.ebird.org/nh), the source of data for this publication. Records are selected for publication and not all species reported will appear in the issue. The published sightings typi- cally represent the highlights of the season. All records are subject to review by the NH Rare Birds Committee and publi- cation of reports here does not imply future acceptance by the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • NH Bird Records
    New Hampshire Bird Records FALL 2016 Vol. 35, No. 3 IN HONOR OF Rob Woodward his issue of New Hampshire TBird Records with its color cover is sponsored by friends of Rob Woodward in appreciation of NEW HAMPSHIRE BIRD RECORDS all he’s done for birds and birders VOLUME 35, NUMBER 3 FALL 2016 in New Hampshire. Rob Woodward leading a field trip at MANAGING EDITOR the Birch Street Community Gardens Rebecca Suomala in Concord (10-8-2016) and counting 603-224-9909 X309, migrating nighthawks at the Capital [email protected] Commons Garage (8-18-2016, with a rainbow behind him). TEXT EDITOR Dan Hubbard In This Issue SEASON EDITORS Rob Woodward Tries to Leave New Hampshire Behind ...........................................................1 Eric Masterson, Spring Chad Witko, Summer Photo Quiz ...............................................................................................................................1 Lauren Kras/Ben Griffith, Fall Fall Season: August 1 through November 30, 2016 by Ben Griffith and Lauren Kras ................2 Winter Jim Sparrell/Katie Towler, Concord Nighthawk Migration Study – 2016 Update by Rob Woodward ..............................25 LAYOUT Fall 2016 New Hampshire Raptor Migration Report by Iain MacLeod ...................................26 Kathy McBride Field Notes compiled by Kathryn Frieden and Rebecca Suomala PUBLICATION ASSISTANT Loon Freed From Fishing Line in Pittsburg by Tricia Lavallee ..........................................30 Kathryn Frieden Osprey vs. Bald Eagle by Fran Keenan .............................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Inventory
    Natural Resource Inventory PORTLAND PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT FALL 2009 Acknowledgments Natural Resource Inventory Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) PROSPERITY AND BUSINESS SUCCESS Mayor Sam Adams, Commissioner-in-charge Susan Anderson, Director SUSTAINABILITY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Steve Dotterrer, Principal Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner DESIGN, PLANNING AND PUBLIC SPACES Gil Kelley, Former Director, Bureau of Planning Project Team NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Roberta Jortner, Environmental Planning Manager, BPS Mindy Brooks; Shannon Buono; Katie Hinman; TRANSPORTATION, TECHNOLOGY AND ACCESS Kevin Martin; Chris Scarzello; Elliot Scott Document Cartography and Design EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT Gary Odenthal, GIS Coordinator, BPS Christine Rains, Graphic Designer, BPS Contributors HUMAN HEALTH, FOOD AND PUBLIC SAFETY Bureau of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Group, with special recognition of: QUALITY OF LIFE, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND EQUITY Shannon Axtell; Jennifer Devlin; Dawn Hottenroth; Dave Helzer; Josh Robben; Chris Prescott; Ry Thompson; Ali Young ARTS, CULTURE AND INNOVATION Bureau of Parks and Recreation Mart Hughes; Deborah Lev Metro Lori Hennings; Justin Houk; Paul Ketcham Project Technical Reviewers Susan Barnes, Patty Snow, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Tom Bouillion, Port of Portland; Bob Eaton, Dave Hendricks, Multnomah County Drainage District; Paul Fishman, SWCA Environmental Consultants; Karen Font Williams, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality; Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute; Jim Labbe, Bob Sallinger, Audubon Society of Portland; Tom McGuire, Adolfson Associates; Nancy Munn, NOAA Fisheries; Jennifer Thompson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alan Yeakley, Portland State University To help ensure equal access to City programs, services and activities, the City of Portland will reasonably modify policies/procedures and provide auxiliary aids/services to persons with disabilities.
    [Show full text]