DOCSLIB.ORG

WSRC-STI-2007-00184, Rev. 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WSRC-STI-2007-00184, Rev. 2 WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 Key Words: F-Area Tank Farm Closure Cap Infiltration Performance Assessment Retention: Permanent FTF CLOSURE CAP CONCEPT AND INFILTRATION ESTIMATES M. A. Phifer W. E. Jones E. A. Nelson M. E. Denham M. R. Lewis E. P. Shine OCTOBER 2007 Savannah River National Laboratory Washington Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract Number DE-AC09-96SR18500 WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 and is an account of work performed under that contract. Neither the United States Department of Energy, nor WSRC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, or product or process disclosed herein or represents that its use will not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, name, manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring of same by Washington Savannah River Company or by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Printed in the United States of America Prepared For U.S. Department of Energy WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 Key Words: F-Area Tank Farm Closure Cap Infiltration Performance Assessment Retention: Permanent FTF CLOSURE CAP CONCEPT AND INFILTRATION ESTIMATES M. A. Phifer W. E. Jones E. A. Nelson M. E. Denham M. R. Lewis E. P. Shine OCTOBER 2007 Savannah River National Laboratory Washington Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract Number DE-AC09-96SR18500 WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 REVIEWS AND APPROVALS - ii - WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 LIST OF MAJOR REVISIONS Notes to the list of major revisions: 1. Revision bars are not utilized within the text for revisions that consist of the addition of an entire section, appendix, etc., or the essential complete rewrite of an entire section, appendix, etc. Such revisions are shaded in yellow in this table. 2. Revision bars are utilized within the text for revisions within an existing section, appendix, etc. Such revisions may or may not be noted in this table. 3. Only major revisions are noted; minor revisions (e.g., changes in Section, Table, and Figure numbers; typographical error corrections; spelling corrections; minor word changes for clarification) are denoted with revision bars within the text only. Revision Date Sections Comment Number 0 4/16/07 All Initial Issue 1 6/4/07 1.0 Added configuration #1a and the closure cap degradation mechanism evaluation 4.3 Added clarification concerning the design of the erosion barrier as a barrier to burrowing animals 4.4.9 Added information on stone QA/QC, the use of weathering analogs, and the future evaluation to determine the material that will be used to infill the stone voids 5.0 Added configuration #1a 5.3.3 Added HELP model input for erosion barrier with sandy soil infill (configuration #1a) 5.3.4 Added table containing literature values of the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand 5.5 Added HELP model results for the initial conditions of configuration #1a 6.0 Added configuration #1a 7.0 Inserted entirely new section to address potential FTF Closure Cap degradation mechanisms 8.0 1) Reference section became Section 8.0 rather than Section 7.0 as in revision 0 of the document; 2) Added additional references Appendix F Inserted entirely new appendix to provide calculations for the HELP model input for an erosion barrier with sandy soil infill (configuration #1a) Appendix G Inserted entirely new appendix to provide HELP model input for an erosion barrier with sandy soil infill (configuration #1a) Appendix H Inserted entirely new appendix to provide HELP model annual water balance data for an erosion barrier with sandy soil infill (configuration #1a) - iii - WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 Revision Date Sections Comment Number 2 10/12/07 1.0 Updated Executive Summary with additional information provided in revision 2 3.0 Divided the background section into the following two subsections: 3.1 FTF Background; and 3.2 Background Water Balance and Infiltration Studies 3.2 Inserted entirely new section to address background water balance and infiltration studies 4.3 1) Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer; 2) Eliminated the elevation difference between the top rip rap and the vegetative soil cover in Figure 12 4.4 Added an additional FTF Closure Cap plot plan and cross-sections 4.4.1 Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer 4.4.3 Added wrinkle control to the HDPE geomembrane QA/QC requirements 4.4.9 1) Added additional stone QA/QC; 2) Divided analogs to be considered into above and below grade analogs; 3) Added additional analogs for consideration 4.4.13 Added additional stone QA/QC 4.4.14 Added additional stone QA/QC 5.0 Descriptions of the seven configurations evaluated were revised for clarity 5.1 Added new Section 5.1 which provides the following: 1) Additional description of the HELP model and its use; 2) Detail concerning the appropriateness of its use; 3) A commitment to evaluate other models as a replacement to the HELP model 5.2 Section 5.2 was previously Section 5.1. Added information on 1) Evaporative zone depth; 2) Maximum leaf index; 3) Methodology used by the HELP model to estimate evapotranspiration; 4) Precipitation data set statistical detail 5.3 Section 5.3 was previously Section 5.2. 5.4 Section 5.4 and all its subsections were previously Section 5.3. - iv - WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 Revision Date Sections Comment Number 2 (cont.) 5.4.5 1) Added wrinkle control to the HDPE geomembrane QA/QC requirements; 2) Revised HELP model geomembrane placement quality designation to be consistent with HELP model guidance provided by Schroeder et al. 1994a and 1994b 5.4.7 Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer 5.4.8 Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer 5.5 Section 5.5 was previously Section 5.4. 5.6 Section 5.6 was previously Section 5.5. This section was essentially entirely rewritten as follows: 1) Added additional detail concerning the initial water balance for all seven configurations considered; 2) Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer; 3) Revised HELP model geomembrane placement quality designation to be consistent with HELP model guidance provided by Schroeder et al. 1994a and 1994b; 4) Provided a comparison of the configuration #6 HELP model water balance to the water balance from background studies 7.0 Added information addressing the potential for mineral precipitation and microbial growth in the lateral drainage layer 7.2 1) Reworded sentence on death of pine trees for clarity; 2) Provided additional detail on pine tree succession assumptions 7.4.1 Added additional detail concerning granite weathering for both above and below grade stone 7.4.2 Added information concerning uprooted wind-thrown trees as a potential erosion barrier degradation mechanism 7.5.1 Added information concerning the potential for clogging of the filter fabric overlying the lateral drainage layer as a degradation mechanism 7.8 Added the following open design issues: 1) sufficiency of 50-foot extension of the closure cap beyond the sides of the tanks; 2) Interface of the Lateral drainage layer with the side-slope rip rap; 3) Practicality and benefit of conducting an electrical leak detection survey of the HDPE geomembrane - v - WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 Revision Date Sections Comment Number 2 (cont.) 8.0 Inserted entirely new section to address FTF Closure Cap degradation and infiltration modeling over 10,000 years 9.0 1) Reference section became Section 9.0 rather than Section 8.0 as in revision 1 of the document; 2) Added additional references Appendix G All the tables in Appendix G were revised as follows: 1) Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer; 2) Revised HELP model geomembrane placement quality designation to be consistent with HELP model guidance provided by Schroeder et al. 1994a and 1994b; 3) Descriptions of the seven configurations evaluated were revised for clarity Appendix H The tables in Appendix H were essentially entirely rewritten as follows: 1) Divided the foundation layer into an upper and lower layer; 2) Revised HELP model geomembrane placement quality designation to be consistent with HELP model guidance provided by Schroeder et al. 1994a and 1994b; 3) Descriptions of the seven configurations evaluated were revised for clarity; 4) Added detailed water balance data tables for all seven configurations considered Appendix I Inserted entirely new appendix to provide FTF Closure Cap degraded property value calculations Appendix J Inserted entirely new appendix to provide HELP model input for FTF Closure Cap configuration #1a over 10,000 years Appendix K Inserted entirely new appendix to provide the configuration #1a detailed HELP model annual water balance data over time Appendix L Inserted entirely new appendix to provide a detailed probability based root penetration model - vi - WSRC-STI-2007-00184, REVISION 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MAJOR REVISIONS ...........................................................................................iii
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physical and Chemical Tests of the Commercial Marbles of the United
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technologic Papers of THE Bureau of Standards S. W. STRATTON, Director No. 123 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TESTS ON THE COMMERCIAL MARBLES OF THE UNITED STATES BY D. W. KESSLER, Assistant Engineer Physicist Bureau of Standards ISSUED JULY 15, 1919 PRICE, 15 CENTS Sold only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1919 1 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL TESTS ON THE COM- MERCIAL MARBLES OF THE UNITED STATES By D. W. Kessler CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 3 II. Purpose of stone testing 4 III. Selection of samples for test 6 IV. Preparation of test specimens 7 V. Compression tests 8 VI. Transverse strength tests 1 VII. Tensile tests 12 VIII. Effect of freezing and thawing 13 IX. Effect of soaking in water 15 X. Effect of repeated temperature changes 16 XI. Absorption tests 17 XII. Apparent specific gravity 19 XIII. True specific gravity 21 XIV. Porosity 22 XV. Staining tests 22 XVI. Permeability tests 23 XVII. Chemical analysis 24 XVIII. Volume-resistivity tests 25 XIX. Carbonic-acid tests 26 XX. Thermal expansion of marble 28 XXI. Warping of marble 31 XXII. The sample collection 32 XXIII. Summary 33 XXIV. Tables 1 to 12 34 I. INTRODUCTION In the year 19 14 plans were made by the United States Geo- logical Survey, Bureau of Mines, Office of Public Roads, and the Bureau of Standards for a cooperative study of the various deposits of stone in the United States. The part of this work undertaken by the Bureau of Standards is the determination of the physical and chemical properties of the stone to establish its value for use in masonry structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Making Factors Leading to the Substitute Method Over In-Kind
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2017 Choices of Contention: Decision Making Factors Leading to the Substitute Method Over In-Kind Repairs and Their ffecE tiveness at Lyndhurst Estate Kirsten Anne Freeman Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Freeman, Kirsten Anne, "Choices of Contention: Decision Making Factors Leading to the Substitute Method Over In-Kind Repairs and Their Effectiveness at Lyndhurst Estate" (2017). All Theses. 2624. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2624 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHOICES OF CONTENTION: DECISION MAKING FACTORS LEADING TO THE SUBSTITUTE METHOD OVER IN-KIND REPAIRS AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AT LYNDHURST ESTATE A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University and College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Kirsten Anne Freeman May 2017 Accepted by: Dr. Carter Hudgins, Committee Chair Dr. Stephanie Crette Frances H. Ford 1 ABSTRACT Lyndhurst Mansion, located in Tarrytown, New York is a masterpiece of American Gothic Revival architecture designed by Alexander Jackson Davis beginning in 1838. Since its acquisition by the National Trust in 1961, the property has carried out a number of repairs to the mansion and other buildings on the estate in which a substitute material was chosen over an in-kind material. Financial constraints appear to be the driving force behind these decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Publications and Products
    National Center for Preservation Technology & Training PTT Products Catalog of Technology Serving the Future Publications of America’s Heritage and Products 1 • National Center for Preservationwww.ncptt.nps.gov Technology and Training About NCPTT NCPTT conducts preservation in preservation by promoting historic technology research preservation training and education NCPTT undertakes opportunities for professionals through research at its in-house projects like the NCPTT Preservation Lee H. Nelson Hall laboratories, which Home of NCPTT Engineering Initiative. include an environmental NCPTT serves as a Clearinghouse and CPTT advances the chamber that allows Web Portal Napplication of science researchers to test the and technology to historic effects of pollutants on cultural materials. NCPTT’s website and publications enable preservation. Working in the Center to deliver the latest news about the fields of archeology, More widely, the Center stimulates new architecture, landscape research through its nationwide grants preservation technologies to a variety of architecture and materials program. audiences. Also, NCPTT supports the conservation, the Center distribution of preservation information accomplishes its mission through through its grants and partnerships. training, education, research, NCPTT provides grants, creates technology transfer and partnerships NCPTT teaches preservation for partnerships. NCPTT maintains a broad partnership future generations base that includes National Park Service NCPTT was created by NCPTT’s Heritage Education program Congress in 1992 to develop sites; other federal agencies; state and tribal and disseminate preservation historic preservation offices; universities; conveys to our youngest citizens the technologies and to train private corporations; and local, state, power of place and the stories behind our practitioners in new national and international non-profit irreplaceable technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2013) 1823E1837
    Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (2013) 1823e1837 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Evaluating effects of chemical weathering and surface contamination on the in situ provenance analysis of building stones in the Cuzco region of Peru with portable XRF Dennis Ogburn a,*, Bill Sillar b, Julio César Sierra c a University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223, United States b University College, London, United Kingdom c Ministerio de Cultura, Cusco, Peru article info abstract Article history: As the only type of instrument capable of determining artifact geochemistry in a wide variety of settings, Received 12 April 2012 portable X-Ray Fluorescence (PXRF) may be frequently utilized as probably the best option for collecting Received in revised form data when removal of objects in part or in whole is unfeasible. However, using PXRF in circumstances 2 September 2012 where sample selection and preparation diverge from standards developed for lab-based instrumenta- Accepted 20 September 2012 tion requires assessing the impact of new and potentially limiting factors to establish the validity of the method in these new contexts. Here we examine the effects of surface contamination and chemical Keywords: weathering on the ability to assess provenance of igneous building stones used in the Cuzco region of Portable XRF PXRF Peru. Surface contamination was assessed through comparing low-impact cleaning methods on diorite Building stone provenance and andesite blocks, and weathering was examined by comparing weathered vs. fresh surfaces of Cuzco samples from two andesite quarries.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Properties of the Principal Commercial Limestones Used for Building Construction in the United States
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF STANDARDS George K. Burgess, Director TECHNOLOGIC PAPERS OF THE BUREAU OF STANDARDS, No. 349 [Part of Vol. 21] PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMERCIAL LIMESTONES USED FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES BY D. W. KESSLER, Research Associate W. H. SLIGH, Associate Physicist Bureau of Standards July 23, 1927 PRICE 30 CENTS $1.25 Per volume on subscription Sold only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1927 T349 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMER- CIAL LIMESTONES USED FOR BUILDING CONSTRUC- TION IN THE UNITED STATES By D. W. Kessler and W. H. Sligh ABSTRACT This paper is devoted mainly to the physical properties of the limestones used in this country for building purposes. Determinations of the strength of these materials in compression, flexure, and shear have been made, as well as a few- measurements of tensile strength. In general, these properties were determined both perpendicular and parallel to the bedding. Compressive strengths have been determined also in the wet and dry conditions. Impact tests were made, since it is believed that the resistance to impact affords some information as to whether a material will be easily defaced in those parts of structures which are subjected to accidental blows. Elasticity measurements have been made on the materials in compression and in flexure, the latter determination being made mainly to compare the results obtained by the two methods. Permeability tests on some of the specimens in connection with absorption and porosity tests have afforded considerable information on the internal structure of the different mate- rials.
    [Show full text]
  • Saltstone Disposal Facility Closure Cap Concept and Infiltration Estimates
    WSRC-STI-2008-00244 Key Words: Saltstone Disposal Facility Closure Cap Infiltration Performance Assessment Retention: Permanent SALTSTONE DISPOSAL FACILITY CLOSURE CAP CONCEPT AND INFILTRATION ESTIMATES W. E. Jones M. A. Phifer MAY 2008 Savannah River National Laboratory Washington Savannah River Company Savannah River Site Aiken, SC 29808 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract Number DE-AC09-96SR18500 WSRC-STI-2008-00244 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared for the United States Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500 and is an account of work performed under that contract. Neither the United States Department of Energy, nor WSRC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, or product or process disclosed herein or represents that its use will not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, name, manufacturer or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring of same by Washington Savannah River Company or by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Printed in the United States of America Prepared For U.S. Department of Energy WSRC-STI-2008-00244 Key Words: Saltstone Disposal Facility Closure Cap Infiltration Performance Assessment Retention: Permanent SALTSTONE DISPOSAL FACILITY CLOSURE CAP CONCEPT AND INFILTRATION ESTIMATES W. E. Jones M. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stone Institute (BSI) for Names of Qualified Firms Experienced in Cleaning Exterior Stone
    RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES CONTENTS 1. Scope 2. Geologic Categories of Stone 3. Trade Classification of Stone Granite Marble Sandstone 4. Natural Stone Uses 5. Finishes 6. Installation Methods Horizontal Installation Vertical Installation 7. Recommended Test Methods 8. Selection of Type and Finish 9. Design Principles 10. Anchoring 11. Recommended Safety Factors for Calculating Stone Slab Thickness for Windload and Lateral Anchoring 12. Jointing Design 13. Flashing 14. Fabrication 15. Shipping and Storage 16. Survey, Layout, and Field Measurements 17. Supervision 18. Protection, Cleaning and Maintenance 19. Guidelines for Stone Repair 20. Reference List 1. SCOPE 1.1 The following material is intended to provide basic guide lines for the architect, engineer, stone contractor, stone fabricator, anchoring device fabricator, and other interested parties for the safe and economical use of building stone in construction. It offers guide lines for the design and application of building stone using metal gravity anchors and/or lateral anchors to: (a) clad solid concrete or masonry, (b) clad the structural frame of a building, either directly, or to subframes, or to curtain walls which are attached to the building structure. It also includes guide lines for the design and application of paving stones. 2. GEOLOGIC CATEGORIES OF STONES FREQUENTLY USED IN CONSTRUCTION 2.1 Sedimentary stones (sandstone, limestone, dolomite) originally formed mainly in sea water, or lakes, from the remains of animals and plants, also from transportation and deposition of rock products. 2.2 Metamorphic stones (marble, serpentine, onyx, slate, quartzite, gneiss) are produced from sedimentary or igneous rocks by the action of heat and pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Methods to Determine Long Term Durability of Wisconsin October 2005 Aggregate Resources 6
    Richard E. Weyers and Gregory S. Williamson Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David W. Mokarem and Daniel S. Lane Virginia Transportation Research Council Philip D. Cady Pennsylvania State University October 2005 WHRP 06-07 NOTICE: This research was funded through the Wisconsin Highway Research Program by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration under Project # (0092-02-03). The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration at the time of publication. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. ii 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession 3. Recipient’s Catalog No WHRP 06-07 No 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Testing Methods to Determine Long Term Durability of Wisconsin October 2005 Aggregate Resources 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report Richard E. Weyers,Gregory S. Williamson,David W. No. Mokarem,Daniel S. Lane and Philip D. Cady 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones of the United States: NAME ______The NIST Test Wall
    Building Stones of the United States: NAME _______________________________ The NIST Test Wall *NOTE: Start NETSCAPE (or Internet Explorer), select File - Open - Choose File - Startup.htm if you are not working on line or if a problem develops. The “live” connection is: http://stonewall.nist.gov/default.htm A stone test wall was constructed to study the performance of stone subjected to weathering. It contains 2352 individual samples of stone, of which 2032 are domestic stone from 47 states, and 320 are stones from 16 foreign countries. Over 30 distinct types of stones are represented, some of which are not commonly used for building purposes. There are many varieties of the common types used in building. The Wall is located at the NIST site in Gaithersburg, Maryland, at the Southwest end of the campus. The wall faces South, providing a direct exposure to the sunlight. The back face to the North resides all day long in the wall's shadow. The wall was built in 1948 at the NBS site in Washington D.C. The wall was placed in jeopardy by the move of NBS to Gaithersburg, MD in the middle 1960s and the occupancy of the old NBS site by the University of the District of Columbia. The wall was moved intact in May 1977 to its present site at NBS (now the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)) in Gaithersburg, MD. Examine the site by looking through the parts labeled: Introduction, Features of the Wall, Location and Orientation, Documentation, and Miscellaneous Pictures. Once you are familiar with the ideas behind the StoneWall - the most direct way to work is by using the “Search by classification” option.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Resistance of Walls of Gravel-Aggregate Concrete Masonry Units
    jonal Bureau of Standards C-^fU^ Library, N. W. Bidg. AUG 1 9 1952 Fire Resistance of Walls of Gravel- Aggregate Concrete Masonry Units United States Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards Building Materials and Structures Report BMS120 BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES REPORTS On request, the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Wash- ington 25, D. C., will place your name on a special mailing list to receive notices of new reports in this series as soon as they are issued. There will be no charge for receiving such notices. An alternative method is to deposit with the Superintendent of Documents the sum of $5, with the request that the reports be sent to you as soon as issued, and that the cost thereof be charged against your deposit. This will provide for the mailing of the publications without delay. You will be notified when the amount of your deposit has become exhausted. If 100 copies or more of any report are ordered at one time, a discount of 25 percent is allowed. Send all orders and remittances to the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. The following publications in this series are available by purchase from the Superintendent of Documents at the prices indicated: BMSl Research on Building Materials and Structures for Use in Low-Cost Housing * BMS2 Methods of Determining the Structural Properties of Low-Cost House Constructions.- lOfi BMS3 Suitability of Fiber Insulating Lath as a Plaster Base 15ji BMS4 Accelerated Aging of Fiber Building Boards 10^ BMS5 Structural Properties of Six Masonry Wall Constructions 15^ BMS6 Survey of Roofing Materials in the Southeastern States 15^ BMS7 Water Permeability of Masonry Walls * BMS8 Methods of Investigation of Surface Treatment for Corrosion Protection of Steel 15^ BMS9 Structural Properties of the Insulated Steel Construction Co.'s "Frameless-Steel" Con- structions for Walls, Partitions, Floors, and Roofs lOjS BMSIO Structural Properties of One of the "Keystone Beam Steel Floor" Constructions Sponsored by the H.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange, Embedded Procurement, and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility: a Case Study from the North American Great Basin by Khori S. Newla
    Exchange, Embedded Procurement, and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility: A Case Study from the North American Great Basin by Khori S. Newlander A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor John D. Speth, Chair Professor Robert E. Whallon Jr. Professor Henry T. Wright Professor Youxue Zhang Professor George T. Jones, Hamilton College To J and our furry family ii Acknowledgments This project could not have been completed without the hard work, support, and guidance of many people. I would especially like to thank my committee: John Speth, Bob Whallon, Henry Wright, Tom Jones, and Youxue Zhang. I am truly grateful for the guidance you have provided along the way. This work is certainly stronger for it. In particular, I owe my dissertation chair, John Speth, special thanks for the long hours he spent talking with me about all facets of this project. Next stop, rock-hounding in Blakeslee Corners! I will forever be indebted to Tom Jones and Charlotte Beck as well. Tom and Charlotte introduced me to archaeology as an undergraduate student at Hamilton College, where our adventures included a field school in Nevada during a “Mormon” cricket invasion. When I turned my gaze back toward the Great Basin in search of a dissertation topic, Tom and Charlotte provided students to work with me in the field, access to all of their collections, and continual support and guidance, even as I pursued ideas with which they may disagree. It is hard for me to imagine a better example of what a student-teacher relationship can be than the one I have enjoyed with Tom and Charlotte.
    [Show full text]
  • Vesicular Basalt Provisioning Practices Among the Prehistoric Hohokam
    Vesicular Basalt Provisioning Practices Among the Prehistoric Hohokam of the Salt-Gila Basin, Southern Arizona by Craig M. Fertelmes A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved November 2014 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: David R. Abbott, Co-Chair Arleyn W. Simon, Co-Chair J. Andrew Darling ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2014 ABSTRACT This study evaluates five different hypotheses potentially accounting for the prehistoric movement of vesicular basalt during the Hohokam occupation of the Salt-Gila Basin (ca. A.D. 700-1450): 1) direct procurement; 2) direct exchange; 3) down-the-line exchange; 4) market exchange; and 5) elite-controlled exchange. The plausibility of each hypothesis is assessed by examining the relative frequency of different vesicular basalt source types at sites as related to the geographic distance from their source; intra-site variance in vesicular basalt source type diversity; inter-site variance in vesicular basalt source type diversity; and temporal specificity and continuity in source preference. The study sample is comprised of 484 vesicular basalt artifacts recovered from nine Hohokam sites: Casa Grande, Gila Crossing, the Hospital Site, La Plaza, Las Colinas, Los Hornos, Lower Santan, Pueblo Grande, and Upper Santan. Geographic provenance data for artifacts are generated by comparing their chemical composition to a geochemical reference database composed of more than 700 vesicular basalt raw material samples from 17 different source areas in the Salt-Gila Basin. Geochemical data for both artifact and raw material samples were collected using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer and a newly developed sampling procedure that provides an efficient, reliable, and nondestructive means of analysis.
    [Show full text]