General. Note: in Addition to the Comments Which Were Received on the Specific Proposals, Some Commentors Made Comments Or Suggestions of a General Nature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General. Note: in Addition to the Comments Which Were Received on the Specific Proposals, Some Commentors Made Comments Or Suggestions of a General Nature General. Note: In addition to the comments which were received on the specific proposals, some commentors made comments or suggestions of a general nature. The responses to these are shown below. Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 094 Transport Canada 108 CAA Hungary 114 CAA Iceland Commentors expressed 1 231 Air 2000 general agreement with the Noted -- -- 273 LFV Norway proposals 293 LFV Sweden 310 Brit. Aerospace A generalized complaint that Noted -- No change intended at the 2 the JAR uses 3 numbering moment systems 137 CAA UK Editorial comment Noted -- -- 136 CAA UK Changes to Subpart N should Noted FCL/OPS co-ordination group to -- take full account of JAR-FCL deal with this. 3 027 CAA Czech Several comments concerning Attended to -- -- Subpart K under ‘K’ 239 Martinair Maintenance Postholder to be Attended to -- -- a separate person under ‘C’ NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 1 Subpart A. Refer to NPA-OPS-12 JAR-OPS 1/3.001(a)(2) Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 34 CAA Finland Parachuting should be an Agree It is intended to regulate for Additional para. (a)(2) to 1 19 Finnish Aeronautic exempted category parachuting under Parts 2 and 4 exempt parachutists 2 25 Heli Air Zagel Should be no limit on number Disagree Wide agreement that 6 is a 26 Agrarflug Helilift of pax reasonable limit provided that -- parachutists and firefighters are exempted 3 32 Skyjet AG Authority could approve more Disagree Ditto above -- than 6 pax 4 36 Transport Canada Exclude firefighters and all Agree Aerial Work to be regulated under Firefighters exempted crew of Aerial Work Parts 2 and 4 under new para. (a)(2) 5 38 INAC Portugal Not presently limited by law Disagree Portugal’s members agree that number can remain at 6 if -- firefighters and parachutists exempted 6 46 LFV Sweden Redefine AW and CAT, Disagree The text is not intended as a increase number to 9 definition of CAT or AW; it is -- provided to allow the continuation of existing activities until the production of JAR-OPS 2 and 4 7 17 FR Aviation Should be regulated in JAR- Disagree See item 6 above -- 43 GAMTA OPS 2 and 4 49 DGAC France 8 10 CAA Iceland 13 CAA Malta Support of the proposal Noted -- -- 16 LBA 22 MOT Austria (Malta suggests that the 27 BAZL FOCA example given in para.5 of the NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 2 Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 30 CAA Slovenia introduction should become 33 CAA Denmark an IEM) 35 RLD 44 ENAC Italy 47 LFV Norway 12 Lynton Aviation 23 EHA 41 BHAB 9 45 BMV Bonn Proposes different text Disagree The words ‘immediately before, during or immediately after’ were -- used to ensure clarity and unambiguity of meaning 10 48 CAA UK Proposes different text Disagree The proposed additional text does not improve clarity. The proposal -- is a duplication of the condition that persons carried must be connected with the Aerial Work activity. JAR-OPS 1/3.125 Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 1 6 CAA Hungary 7 N/k 10 CAA Iceland Support of the proposal Noted -- -- 16 LBA without comment 30 CAA Slovenia 33 SLV Denmark 35 DGAC NL 37 Transport Canada 44 ENAC Italy 2 40 ALPA USA Support of proposal but Agreed Additional Section 2 50 DGAC France suggest additional provisions material agreed and NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 3 Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response to allow for loss or theft. included 3 3 UK Flying Club Retain original text Agreed Avoid unnecessary administration See Annex 1 and 2 to 4 PDG Heli Ltd. (Falsification cannot be avoided) comment No:5 5 Air Malta Note: activity vis-à-vis ICAO? 11 Lynton Av. Ltd 21 Maersk Air 39 IAOPA 42 BHAP 4 14 CAA Malta Allow copies to be carried for Partly See items above and comment 15 Sabena all documents (at the choice agreed No:20 ‘at the choice of’ is 20 AEA of the operator) considered unnecessary addition 24 EHA 29 Alitalia Express 5 1 and 2 Bxl national airport For some documents copies Noted -- Proposal amended 8 and 9 Bond Helicopter Ltd should be acceptable accordingly. Legal opinion 18 British World Airline is that ICAO requires the original of some of the documents. 6 31 Skyjet AG, CH Useless to regulate; depends Noted on national law 7 28 FOCA Original of Flight Crew Not agreed Would cause problems at the time Add: ‘original or copy’ licence to be carried (subpara. of renewal of licence. b) Subpart B. Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 276 DGAC Lux 1 002 Finnair 139 AEA IEM 1.065(a): Delete Agreed Subject is already covered in para 256 CAAd Finland 2 of IEM 1.065 Deleted 2 201 DGAC France IEM 1.065(a) alternative Agreed NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 4 Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response suggestion to delete The following Subpart B comment/responses are an abbreviation of a lengthy and comprehensive explanation put to the OC as Working Paper 20.4B/00. For the full response, reference should be made to this WP. Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 3 096 ORCG 1.037(a): add ‘and maintain’ Agreed Will avoid doubt Words added. Substance of comment 4 200 DGAC France 1.037(a): Emphasise Flight Noted and incorporated by Safety Prevention programme discussed development of new paras. (b) and (c) 1.037(a)(2): Small operators, Occurrence Reporting Scheme is 5 115 Operator with few aeroplanes, will not an integral part of the Acc. be able to establish trends and Not agreed. Prevention and Flt. Safety Prog. -- should not be required to The Scheme will support the establish an occurrence operator’s ability to address reporting scheme. deficiencies and Flt. Safety. 041 IFALPA 1.037(a)(2): Reporters should Voluntary scheme removes 6 057 ALPA Germany have the right to remain Partly obligation to report. Complete Text amended to require 122 ECA anonymous or that the whole agreed anonymity would make info. operators to accept 173 OPSG scheme should be confidential difficult to disseminate anonymous reports and voluntary. 1.037(a)(4): new subpara. Most operators would appoint 7 LBA needed; ‘the appointment of a Agreed such a person but the JAR does Text amended accordingly person accountable for not actually require it. managing the prog.’ 041 IFALPA IEM 1.037(a)(2): upgrade to Value of this suggestion is negated 8 057 ECA AMC Not agreed by development of JAR-11 -- 173 SNPL proposals IEM: change the overall To restrict distribution as 9 039 Manufacturer objective from ‘dissemination Not agreed suggested might prevent the info. -- to other persons’ to reaching the interested parties ‘reporting to the Authorities’ NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 5 Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response 001 AEA 056 DGAC Lux IEM para 4: questions the 10 138 need for or the meaning of the Agreed Little reason to keep the para. Para. deleted. 193 Operators para. 275 Suggest that occurrences 11 41 IFALPA should remain in the database; 173 ECA the significance may not be Agreed Text amended accordingly apparent until later. 12 034 Dassault 1.085(b)(1): suggest align the Partly Meaning of ‘fault’ could include Word order changed (see 098 ORCG text with JAR-21 and/or agreed ‘failure’ JAR-21) and ‘fault’ include the word ‘fault’. introduced. 003 AEA Not all crew members would 140 DGAC Fr be competent to identify an 202 DGAC Lx ‘airworthiness’ problem. Partly Words “.. which he 13 277 Operator Suggest words ‘perceive’ or agreed believes may affect …” 227 IAOPA ‘believe’ or, alternatively included; ‘airworthiness’ 248 ERA delete ‘airworthiness’. retained. 098 ORCG Also four of these suggest additional para. to avoid the Agreed Additional words inserted. need for every crew member to report the same occurrence. - One comment included suggestion that it is wrong to Point taken but, on balance, it is 14 028 teach all crew members to Not agreed thought that most commanders make report; if they fail, this and operators would prefer to -- might absolve the operator of teach the need for reporting. ensuing responsibility. Need for crew members to The commander of any aeroplane 15 116 Operator (small a/c) report should not apply to Not agreed should know if one of the crew -- small aeroplane operators. have noticed something untoward. 1.085(b)(2); suggest delete 1.420 refers to incidents and this words ‘endangered or could para. relates to faults etc. which 16 099 ORCG have endangered’; all Not agreed might become incidents if not -- NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 6 Item Comment Commentor Summary of Operations Reason for the Resulting change to Number Comment Committee Response NPA text Response incidents should be reported reported. under 1.420(a) NPA-OPS-15 Comment/Response Document Page 7 Subpart C Item Comment Commentor JAR-OPS Summary of Comment Operatio Reason for the Resulting Number paragraph ns Response change to Committe NPA text e Response 1 058 SNPL 1.175 (g) Deletion of "capable of exercising Not Not necessary to specifically operational control" is not acceptable agreed mention the capability; NPA text _ reflects the capability adequately 2 113 HQ Maintenance 1.175 (j)+ -No discriminant of 20 empl.
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Brought on 25 November 2019 by Confédération
    23.3.2020 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 95/13 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 6 November 2019 — Stichting Cartel Compensation, Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others (Case C-819/19) (2020/C 95/12) Language of the case: Dutch Referring court Rechtbank Amsterdam Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: Stichting Cartel Compensation, Equilib Netherlands BV Defendants: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Martinair Holland NV, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG, British Airways plc, Société Air France SA, Singapore Airlines Ltd, Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Martinair Holland NV, Société Air France SA, Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd, Singapore Airlines Ltd, Lufthansa Cargo AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Swiss International Air Lines AG, British Airways plc, Air Canada, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd, SAS AB, Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden, SAS Cargo Group A/S, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Martinair Holland NV, Société Air France SA, Lufthansa Cargo AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, British Airways plc Question referred In a dispute between injured parties (in the present case shippers, recipients of air cargo services) and air carriers, do the national courts have the power — either because of the direct effect of Article 101 TFEU, or at least of Article 53 EEA, or on the basis of (the direct effect of) Article 6 of Regulation 1/2003 (1) — to fully apply Article 101
    [Show full text]
  • Air France KLM Martinair Cargo and Bolloré Logistics Team up to Launch the First Low-Carbon Airfreight Route Between France and the United States
    Press release Puteaux, 21 January 2021 Air France KLM Martinair Cargo and Bolloré Logistics team up to launch the first low-carbon airfreight route between France and the United States Bolloré Logistics has joined the Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) programme of Air France KLM Martinair Cargo (AFKLMP Cargo) for its 2021 shipments between Paris Charles de Gaulle and New York John F. Kennedy airports. This first of its kind collaboration illustrates the ambition of these two historical partners to tackle the environmental challenge of airfreight transportation. Christophe Boucher, EVP Air France Cargo says: “The Cargo SAF Programme enables shippers and forwarders to power a percentage of their flights with SAF. Customers determine their own level of engagement and we ensure that their entire investment is used for sourcing SAF. I’m delighted to see the speed at which Air France KLM Martinair Cargo and Bolloré Logistics have come to an agreement on the use of our SAF programme, launched a few weeks ago. I’m proud that together we are trendsetters in a field that will grow in our companies and in society.” This innovative aviation fuel will cut CO₂ emissions by at least 50% on airfreight shipped by Bolloré Logistics on this symbolic trade lane. Investing in this strategic route represents a new step towards achieving greater sustainability in the future for both Bolloré Logistics and AFKLMP Cargo. “Reducing carbon emissions is a major challenge in the airfreight transportation industry and Bolloré Logistics is committed to addressing this with innovative solutions. In 2021, the company has committed itself to reducing scope 3 CO₂ emissions linked to the performance of its transport services by 30% by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • New Expanded Joint Venture
    Press Release The Power of Choice for Cargo Customers as Air France-KLM, Delta and Virgin Atlantic launch trans-Atlantic Joint Venture AMSTERDAM/PARIS, ATLANTA and LONDON: February 3rd, 2020 – Air France-KLM Cargo, Delta Air Lines Cargo and Virgin Atlantic Cargo are promising cargo customers more connections, greater shipment routing flexibility, improved trucking options, aligned services and innovative digital solutions with the launch of their expanded trans-Atlantic Joint Venture (JV). The new partnership, which represents 23% of total trans-Atlantic cargo capacity or more than 600,000 tonnes annually, will enable the airlines to offer the best-ever customer experience, and a combined network of up to 341 peak daily trans-Atlantic services – a choice of 110 nonstop routes with onward connections to 238 cities in North America, 98 in Continental Europe and 16 in the U.K. More choice and convenience for customers Customers will be able to leverage an enhanced network built around the airlines’ hubs in Amsterdam, Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, London Heathrow, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York-JFK, Paris, Seattle and Salt Lake City. It creates convenient nonstop or one-stop connections to every corner of North America, Europe and the U.K., giving customers the added confidence of delivery schedules being met by a wide choice of options. The expanded JV enables greater co-operation between the airlines, focused on delivering world class customer service and reliability on both sides of the Atlantic achieved through co-located facilities, joint trucking options as well as seamless bookings and connected service recovery. The airlines already co-locate at warehouses in key U.S., U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/JV.19 - */*** KLM / ALITALIA
    EN Case No COMP/JV.19 - */*** KLM / ALITALIA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/08/1999 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 399J0019 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 11.08.1999 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. to the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject: Case M/JV-19 KLM-Alitalia Notification of 29 June 1999 pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation N°4064/89 1. On 29 June 1999, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/891 as last amended by Regulation (EC) No. 1310/972 (the Merger Regulation) by which the undertakings Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (KLM) and Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane S.p.A. (Alitalia) will constitute a Joint Venture under the meaning of Article 3 (2) of the Merger Regulation. 2. In the course of the proceedings, the parties submitted undertakings designed to eliminate competition concerns identified by the Commission, in accordance with Article 6(2) of the Merger Regulation. After examination of the notification and in the light of these modifications, the Commission has concluded that the operation 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p.1; corrigendum OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p.13 2 OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p.1; corrigendum OJ L 40, 13.2.1998, p.17 Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Disability-Related Complaint Data Foreign Carriers
    Summary of Disability-Related Complaint Data Foreign Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 1,654 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 11 AEROENLACES NACIONALES S.A. DE C.V. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROGAL 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS, S.A. 0 AEROSUR, S.A. 0 AEROSVIT AIRLINES 0 AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 6 AIR ATLANTA-ICELANDIC 0 AIR BERLIN 11 AIR CANADA 370 AIR CHINA 1 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS, S.A.U. 1 AIR INDIA 4 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 2 AIR JAPAN, CO., LTD. 5 AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 11 AIR PACIFIC LIMITED 0 AIR TAHITI NUI AIRLINES 2 AIR TRANSAT A.T., INC. 6 AIRES 1 ALITALIA COMPAGNIA AEREA ITALIANA 41 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO., LTD. 15 ARKIA ISRAELI AIRLINES, LTD. 0 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 2 ASTRAEUS D/B/A ICELAND EXPRESS 0 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES AG 1 AVIANCA, S.A. 15 AVIATION MATTERS, INC. 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDINGS LIMITED 2 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 237 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS LIMITED 11 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED 11 CAYMAN AIRWAYS LIMITED 0 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD. 2 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES CORPORATION 0 COMLUX AVIATION AG 0 COMLUX MALTA LTD. 0 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACION, S.A. 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA DE AVIACION, S.A. 10 CONDOR FLUGDIENST GMBH 2 CORSAIR 0 CZECH AIRLINES 1 DC AVIATION GMBH 0 DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG 151 EGYPTAIR 1 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 23 EMIRATES 24 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES ENTERPRISE 0 ETIHAD AIRWAYS P.J.S.C. 6 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 6 FINNAIR OY D/B/A FINNAIR OYJ 1 FIRST AIR 0 GLOBAL JET LUXEMBOURG S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Codes.Indd
    AIRLINE CODES AND AWB PREFIX PREFIX IATA code AIRLINE PREFIX IATA code AIRLINE 044 AR Aerolineas Argentinas 173 HA Hawaiian Air Cargo 139 AM Aero Mexico 096 IR Iran Air 439 ZI Aigle Azur 131 JL Japan Airlines 657 BT Air Baltic 745 TB JetairFly 745 AB Air Berlin 589 9W Jet Airways 580 RU Air Bridge Cargo 074 KL KLM 159 CW Air Cargo Global 180 KE Korean Airlines 014 AC Air Canada 229 KU Kuwait Airways 427 TX Air Caraibes 045 LA Lan Chili 999 CA Air China International 148 LN Libyan Airlines 745 UX Air Europe 020 LH Lufthansa Cargo 057 AF Air France 232 MH Malaysian Airline 167 QM Air Malawi 129 MO Martinair 643 KM Air Malta 429 VL Med View Airlines 239 MK Air Mauritius 805 4X Mercury Air Cargo 086 NZ Air New Zealand 716 MG MNG Airlines Cargo 115 JU Air Serbia 519 NAB Niger Air Cargo 135 VT Air Tahiti 933 KZ Nippon Cargo Airlines 649 TS Air Transat 329 DY Norwegian Cargo 574 4W Allied Air 910 WY Oman Air 001 AA American Airlines 214 PR Pakistan International 810 M6 Amerijet International 624 PC Pegasus Airlines 988 OZ Asiana Airlines 079 PR Philippine Airlines 369 5Y Atlas Global 157 QR Qatar Airways 134 AV Avianca - Aerovias 672 BI Royal Runei Airlines 417 E6 Bringer Air Cargo 512 RJ Royal Jordanian 125 BA British Airways 117 SK Scandinavian Airlines 489 W8 Cargojet Airways 774 FM Shanghai Airlines 172 CV Cargolux Airlines 728 U3 Sky Gates 700 5C CAL 501 7L Silk Way West Airlines 160 CX Cathay Pacific Airways 618 SQ Singapore Airline Cargo 297 CI China Airlines 603 LX Srilankan Airlines 112 CK China Cargo Airlines 242 4E Stabo Air 781 MU
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Refers International Air Cargo Cartel Case International Air Cargo
    Edition 36 • September 2010 Towards a fair and efficient economy for all. In this Edition South Africa refers Page 1 - 3 South Africa refers International Air Cargo Cartel Case International Air Cargo Page 4 - 5 Cartel Case Settlements reached in two fertilizer abuse of dominance cases n 28 July 2010, the Commission referred a Page 6 - 7 case of cartel conduct The Commission concludes its investigation into the Polymers Oin South Africa’s industry international air cargo trade against certain airlines namely, British Airways Plc, South African Airways Page 8 - 9 (Pty) Ltd, Air France Cargo-KLM Power Metal Recyclers settles its scrap metal cartel case Cargo, Alitalia Cargo, Cargolux International S.A., Singapore Airlines, Martinair Cargo and Lufthansa Cargo Page 9 AG (“the airlines”). The case is By: William Kganare Dawn raids notable because of its international dimensions, the importance of the Page 10 - 11 industry for the economy and also Bid-rigging and other cartel conduct because of the insights it provides into by smaller players the determination of cartel penalties in different countries. Page 11 - 12 Some pick-up in Merger Activity The Commission’s investigation and referral followed an application for immunity by Lufthansa under the Page 12 - 13 Commission’s Corporate Leniency Bedrock and Mondi merger approved Programme. The application was subject to three conditions filed at the beginning of 2006 with the Commission and the complaint was By: Azraa Mohamed Page 14 - 15 subsequently initiated in March 2006. The Commission’s Call for the Voluntary Notification of Small The airlines are all members of the Mergers international cargo, this conduct was International Air Transport Association (IATA), an international trade still continuing in February 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers
    Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 11,518 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 0 AERO CALIFORNIA 1 AERODYNAMICS, INC. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 0 AEROMEXICO 1 AEROPOSTAL ALAS DE VENEZUEL 3 AEROSVIT UKRANIAN AIRLINES 0 AIR ATLANTA EUROPE 16 AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC 0 AIR CANADA 248 AIR CANADA JAZZ 10 AIR CHINA 1 AIR COMET S.A. 0 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS 0 AIR FRANCE 30 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 1 AIR JAPAN, CO 0 AIR LUXOR 0 AIR NEW ZEALAND 3 AIR PACIFIC, LTD. 0 AIR TAHITI NUI 1 AIR TRANSAT 17 AIR WISCONSIN 132 AIR-INDIA 4 AIRTRAN 87 ALASKA AIRLINES 215 ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIA 10 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO. 0 ALLEGIANT 5 ALOHA AIRLINES 7 AMERICA WEST 536 AMERICAN AIRLINES 2061 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES 171 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 3 ATA 94 ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES 191 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES 27 AVIACSA AIRLINES 3 AVIATION CONCEPTS 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDING LIMITED 5 BOSTON-MAINE AIRWAYS 8 BRITANNIA AIRWAYS LTD. 147 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 165 BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS LTD 16 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS 1 CASINO EXPRESS 1 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD 8 CHAMPION AIR 7 CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC 67 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD 3 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 0 COMAIR 301 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACI 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA (COPA) 3 CONDOR FLUGDIENST 0 CONTINENTAL 398 CONTINENTAL MICRONESIA 3 CZECH AIRLINES 2 DELTA AIR LINES 1326 EGYPTAIR 0 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 66 EMIRATES AIRLINE 4 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 0 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2 EXECUTIVE AIRLINES 11 FALCON AIR EXPRESS, INC.
    [Show full text]