DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Eligibility Determination of Wild and Scenic Rivers on the Manti-La Sal National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Eligibility Determination of Wild and Scenic Rivers on the Manti-La Sal National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Final Eligibility Manti-La Sal National Forest Determination of March 2003 Wild & Scenic Rivers Photo – Lower Huntington Creek Final Eligibility of Wild & Scenic Rivers - Manti-La Sal National Forest 030703 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents, including List of Tables, Maps & Photos Page Abstract Introduction......................................................................................................1 Tables - Eligible Watercourses – Manti Division..............................................2 Tables Eligible Watercourses – La Sal Division...............................................3 & 4 Map Introductions ............................................................................................5 Map – General Location of Manti and La Sal Divisions ..................................6 Maps Eligible Watercourses – Manti Division..................................................7 to 9 Maps Eligible Watercourses – La Sal Division...............................................10 to 20 I. Introduction – The Wild and Scenic Rivers System A. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act .......................................................................21 & 22 B. Eligibility Phase of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act ...................................22 to 24 C. Guides, Agreements & Plans....................................................................24 & 25 II. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Inventory and Eligibility Determination Process A. Definitions and Guidelines Used to Determine Potentially Eligible Rivers.........................................................................26 & 27 B. Inventory and Evaluations Steps ..............................................................27 & 28 C. Guidelines for Determining Rating and Scale of Importance for Outstandingly Remarkable Values .....................................................28 & 29 D. Interagency and Local Government Coordination, and other public involvement....................................................................29 to 33 III. Inventoried Watercourses with Outstandingly Remarkable Values A. Manti Division............................................................................................34 to 47 B. La Sal Division .........................................................................................48 to 55 IV. Watercourses Considered Eligible for Suitability Study in the Wild and Scenic River Designation Process – A. Manti Division – Eligible Watercourse ......................................................56 B. La Sal Division – Eligible Watercourses...................................................57 to 59 C. Descriptions and Evaluation of Eligible Watercourses – 1. Manti Division – Ferron/Price Ranger District .....................................60 to 78 Lower Left Fork of Huntington Creek.............................................60 to 64 Huntington Creek...........................................................................65 to 71 Fish Creek .....................................................................................72 to 78 Table of Contents - i Final Eligibility of Wild & Scenic Rivers - Manti-La Sal National Forest 030703 Page 2. La Sal Division – Monticello Ranger District .......................................79 to 135 North Fork of Whiskers & Whiskers Draw .....................................79 to 83 Hammond Canyon.........................................................................84 to 90 Notch Canyon................................................................................91 to 97 Posey Canyon ...............................................................................98 to 104 Chippean & Allen Canyons..........................................................105 to 112 Butts, Arch & Texas Canyons......................................................113 to 119 Upper Dark Canyon.....................................................................120 to 127 Lower Dark Canyon.....................................................................128 to 135 3. La Sal Division – Monticello Ranger District......................................136 to 152 Mill Creek Gorge..........................................................................136 to 141 Roc Creek ...................................................................................142 to 147 Miners Basin................................................................................148 to 152 V. Appendices A. Maps – Inventoried and Eligible Watercourse Segments on the Manti Division ..................................................................................154 & 155 B. Maps – Inventoried and Eligible Watercourse Segments on the La Sal Division .................................................................................156 to 159 C. Maps – Regions of Comparison........................................................160 to 167 D. Definitions and Attributes of Outstandingly Remarkable Values .......168 to 184 E. Federal and State Agencies, Local Government Groups and Publics Involved in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Determination Process on the Manti-La Sal National Forest....................................185 & 186 F. “Tracking Report” - Changes, Modifications & Additions to the Inventory and Evaluation Process for Potentially Eligible Wild & Scenic Rivers on the Manti-La Sal National Forest ...............187 to 218 G. Wild & Scenic Rivers Suitability Guidelines ......................................219 TABLES Page Tables of Inventoried Watercourses by Watershed – Manti Division ..................34 to 47 Table III.A.1 – Chicken Creek Watershed ..................................................34 Table III.A.2 – Fountain Green Watershed .................................................35 Table III.A.3 – Lower San Pitch Watershed ................................................35 & 36 Table III.A.4 – Manti Canyon Watershed ....................................................36 Table III.A.5 – Middle San Pitch Watershed ...............................................37 Table III.A.6 – Upper San Pitch Watershed ................................................37 Table III.A.7 – Thistle Creek Watershed .....................................................38 Table of Contents - ii Final Eligibility of Wild & Scenic Rivers - Manti-La Sal National Forest 030703 Page Table III.A.8 – Quitchupah Watershed ........................................................38 Table III.A.9 – Muddy Creek Watershed .....................................................39 Table III.A.10 – Ferron Creek Watershed .....................................................40 Table III.A.11 – Cottonwood Creek Watershed ............................................41 & 42 Table III.A.12 – Huntington Creek Watershed ..............................................42 to 44 Table III.A.13 – Gordon Creek Watershed ...................................................45 Table III.A.14 – Scofield Watershed .............................................................46 Table III.A.15 – Lake Fork Watershed ..........................................................47 Tables of Inventoried Watercourses by Watershed – La Sal Division.................48 to 55 Table III.B.1 – South Cottonwood Watershed .............................................48 Table III.B.2 – Arch Canyon Watershed .....................................................49 Table III.B.3 – Grand Gulch Watershed.......................................................49 Table III.B.4 – Dark Canyon Watershed ......................................................50 Table III.B.5 – Gypsum Canyon Watershed ...............................................50 Table III.B.6 – Colorado River/Moab Watershed .........................................51 Table III.B.7 – Montezuma Creek Watershed .............................................52 Table III.B.8 – Devil Canyon Watershed .....................................................52 Table III.B.9 – Johnson Creek Watershed ..................................................53 Table III.B.10 – Mill Creek Watershed ..........................................................53 Table III.B.11 – Geyser Creek Watershed ....................................................54 Table III.B.12 – La Sal Creek Watershed .....................................................54 Table III.B.13 – Lower Dolores Watershed ...................................................55 Table III.B.14 – Castle Valley Watershed .....................................................55 Tables of Eligible Watercourses – Manti Division ...............................................56 & 57 Tables of Eligible Watercourses – La Sal Division..............................................57 to 59 Page MAPS General Location Map of Manti-La Sal National Forest and the counties of Sanpete, Emery, Carbon, Utah, San Juan & Grand .........................31 Eligible Rivers on the Manti Division Lower Left Fork of Huntington Creek.............................................................64 Table of Contents - iii Final Eligibility of Wild & Scenic Rivers - Manti-La Sal National Forest 030703 Page MAPS continued Huntington Creek...........................................................................................71 Fish Creek .....................................................................................................78 Eligible Rivers on the La Sal Division North Fork of Whiskers..................................................................................83
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • Outreachnotice
    OUTREACH NOTICE USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION, R4 Manti-La Sal National Forest Phone (435) 636-3354 Natural Resource Specialist GS-0401-5/7/9 Response requested by December 7, 2016 Position Description The purpose of this outreach notice is to (1) gauge interest in the position, (2) to alert interested individuals of this upcoming employment opportunity. The position is expected to be advertised on www.usajobs.gov/ in the fall of 2016. (Interested persons should respond using the Outreach Response on page 6). The Moab/Monticello Ranger District of the Manti-La Sal National Forest will be seeking to fill two GS-0410-5/7/9 Natural Resource Specialist positions. The duty stations for the position will be Moab, Utah. Duties include but are not limited to the following: Duties: The duties of these position are varied and diverse. One appointee will perform work associated with the Lands and Recreation Special Uses Program, Minerals and Roads Programs and the other appointee will work primarily in the Recreation Program dealing with developed recreation, interpretation and Recreation Special Uses. Compiles material and supply estimates for recreation facilities, maintenance, and operation. Participates in the drafting of annual work action plans for carrying out recreation management 1 decisions. Participates in the implementation of recreation plan objectives and the full range of recreation uses, administration of special authorization for recreation events and concessionaire operations. Inspects campgrounds and other recreation areas to determine that improvements are properly maintained; gathers data for studies of campground use; conducts compliance checks; assists in preparation of recreation reports; and identifies potential recreation sites.
    [Show full text]
  • ACEC Evaluations for Existing and Nominated ACEC – Relevance and Importance
    Evaluations for Existing and Nominated ACECs, Relevance and Importance, Monticello Field Office, July 2005 ACEC Evaluations for Existing and Nominated ACEC – Relevance and Importance TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background - Areas of Environmental Concern ………………….……….. 3 FLPMA …………………………………………. 3 43CFR 1610.7-2 ………………………………… 3 BLM Manual 1613 ……………………………… 3 NOI – BLM Monticello Field Office ……………. 4 San Juan County Perspectives on ACECs ………. 4 State of Utah Perspectives on ACECs …………… 4 ACECs and Wilderness Study Areas ……………... 5 2. The ACEC Process – Table ……………………………………………….. 6 3. Summary ………………………………………………………………….. 7 Table 3.1 MFO ACECs from 1991 RMP ……..…... 7 Table 3.2 Nominated ACEC by BLM FOs ..……… 7 Table 3.3 Nominated ACECs by SUWA ………… 8 Table 3,4 Summary Table of Potential ACECs …. 8 Table 3.5 MFO ID Team …………………………. 9 4. Existing ACECs – Monticello Field Office ………………………………. 10 Alkali Ridge ACEC ……………………………... 10 Bridger Jack Mesa ACEC ……………………… 10 Butler Wash ACEC ……………………………… 11 Cedar Mesa ACEC ……………………………… 12 Dark Canyon ACEC …………………………….. 13 Hovenweep ACEC ……………………………….. 14 Indian Creek ACEC ……………………………… 15 Lavender Mesa ACEC …………………………… 16 Scenic Highway Corridor ACEC ………………… 16 Shay Canyon ACEC ……………………………... 17 Table 4.1: Special Management Consideration for BLM ACECs designated in the 1991 RMP ………….. 18 5. Nominated ACECs ………………………………………………………. 19 Lockhart Basin …………………………............... 19 Valley of the Gods ……………………………… 20 Letter from SUWA ………………………………. .. 22 Table 5.2 - Nominated by SUWA ………………… 24 1. Canyonlands ………………………………… 24 2. Cedar Mesa ………………………………….. 27 3. Dark Canyon ………………………………… 29 4. Monument Canyon ………………………….. 31 5. Redrock Plateau ……………………………… 33 6. San Juan River ………………………………. 36 7. White Canyon ……………………………….. 39 Evaluations for Existing and Nominated ACECs, Monticello Field Office, Relevance and Importance, July 2005 6. Evaluation Process and Relevance and Importance Criteria …………… 42 The Scope of the Evaluation Process 6.1 Evaluation of existing ACECs ………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Loop Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Update Prepared By
    ENERGY LOOP SCENIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2011 Energy Loop Scenic Byway Steering Committee: Jana Abrams, Energy Loop Scenic Byway Coordinator Bill Broadbear, US Forest Service Rosann Fillmore, US Forest Service Chanel Atwood, Castle Country Regional Information Center Tina Carter, Emery County Travel Bureau Kathy Hanna Smith, Carbon County Travel Bureau Kevin Christensen, Sanpete County Economic Development Mike McCandless, Emery County Economic Development Dan Richards, Utah State Parks Division Floyd Powell, Utah State Parks Division Nicole Nielson, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Dale Stapley, Utah Department of Transportation Kevin Nichol, Utah Department of Transportation Gael Duffy Hill, Utah Office ofTourism PREPARED BY Fehr& Peers Bonneville Research 2180 South 1300 East Suite 220 170 South Main Street, Suite 775 Salt Lake City_ Utah 84106 Salt Lake City_ Utah 84101 p 801.463.7600 p 801.364.5300 "--' ""'-' CONTENTS '-.~· ""-' 1: Executive Summary Commercial Truck Traffic 35 1 ""'-" ~ 2: Introduction 5 6: Highway Safety and Management 35 "--" Byway Corridor Description 5 Commuter Traffic 36 ""-" ~ Purpose of Corridor Management Plan 6 Tourism Traffic 36 '<../ Guiding Purpose 9 Highway Safety Management Strategies 41 '-" Mission and Vision Statement 9 7: Interpretation 45 '-.../ "'-' Demographic Summary 49 3: Byway Organizational Plan 9 ""-" Goals 10 Energy Loop Key Travel/Tourism Information 49 ~ Byway Committee 11 Location and Access 49 """ "'-" Byway Coordinator 12 8: Demographics and Economic Development 49
    [Show full text]
  • English Information
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Capitol Reef National Park … the light seems to flow or shine out of the rock rather than to be reflected English from it. – Clarence Dutton, geologist and early explorer of Capitol Reef, 1880s A Wrinkle in the Earth A vibrant palette of color spills across the landscape before bridges, and twisting canyons. Over millions of years geologic forces you. The hues are constantly changing, altered by the play shaped, lifted, and folded the earth, creating this rugged, remote area of light against the towering cliffs, massive domes, arches, known as the Waterpocket Fold. Panorama Point at Sunset Erosion creates waterpockets and potholes that collect The Castle is made of fractured Wingate Sandstone perched upon grey Chinle and red Moenkopi Formations. rainwater and snowmelt, enhancing a rich ecosystem. From the east, the Waterpocket Fold appears as a formidable barrier Capitol Dome reminded early travelers of the US Capitol to travel, much like a barrier reef in an ocean. building and later inspired the name of the park. Creating the Waterpocket Fold Capitol Reef’s defining geologic feature is a wrinkle in Uplift: Between 50 and 70 million years ago, an ancient fault was Earth’s crust, extending nearly 100 miles from Thousand reactivated during a time of tectonic activity, lifting the layers to the Lake Mountain to Lake Powell. It was created over time by west of the fault over 7,000 feet higher than those to the east. Rather three gradual, yet powerful processes—deposition, uplift, than cracking, the rock layers folded over the fault line.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Stratigraphy Column
    Capitol Reef National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geology “Geology knows no such word as forever.” —Wallace Stegner Capitol Reef National Park’s geologic story reveals a nearly complete set of Mesozoic-era sedimentary layers. For 200 million years, rock layers formed at or near sea level. About 75-35 million years ago tectonic forces uplifted them, forming the Waterpocket Fold. Forces of erosion have been sculpting this spectacular landscape ever since. Deposition If you could travel in time and visit Capitol Visiting Capitol Reef 180 million years ago, Reef 245 million years ago, you would not when the Navajo Sandstone was deposited, recognize the landscape. Imagine a coastal you would have been surrounded by a giant park, with beaches and tidal flats; the water sand sea, the largest in Earth’s history. In this moves in and out gently, shaping ripple marks hot, dry climate, wind blew over sand dunes, in the wet sand. This is the environment creating large, sweeping crossbeds now in which the sediments of the Moenkopi preserved in the sandstone of Capitol Dome Formation were deposited. and Fern’s Nipple. Now jump ahead 20 million years, to 225 All the sedimentary rock layers were laid million years ago. The tidal flats are gone and down at or near sea level. Younger layers were the climate supports a tropical jungle, filled deposited on top of older layers. The Moenkopi with swamps, primitive trees, and giant ferns. is the oldest layer visible from the visitor center, The water is stagnant and a humid breeze with the younger Chinle Formation above it.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    CONSERVATION 8.1 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 8 8.2 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION 8.3 AIR QUALITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH UPTOWN COMMUNITY PLAN November 2016 INTRODUCTION Conservation is the planned management, preservation, and wise utilization of natural resources and landscapes. Sustainable development is development which respects the balance and relationship between the economy, ecology and equity. The principles of conservation stress humankind’s CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS relationship to the natural environment and understand the benefits conferred socially as well as environmentally. • Implementation of sustainable development Socially, these benefits can accrue to all people as well and “green” building practices to reduce as future generations so there can be a sense of equity dependence on non-renewable energy sources, in the appropriate practice of conservation and the lower energy costs, reduce emissions and water implementation of sustainable development. consumption. Many aspects of conservation and sustainability have • Preservation of the natural character of much broader geographic and political relationships Uptown’s open space for its biological diversity and may be more suited to implement on a citywide or as well as important relief from urban even regional basis. However, there is much that can development. be done at the local community level, and individual • Protection of natural canyon landforms and communities can also be at the forefront of the policy habitat from building encroachment and discussion. incompatible uses. The General Plan Conservation Element positions the • Public access to scenic resources and open City to become an international model of sustainable space that is maintained and enhanced where development and to provide for the long-term needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Story of Canyonlands National Park
    «u GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1327 JUL 1 7 1990 Dacus Library Wmthrop College Documents Department -T7 LOOKING NORTH FROM EAST WALL OF DEVILS LANE, just south of the Silver Stairs. Needles are Cedar Mesa Sandstone. Junction Butte and Grand View Point lie across Colorado River in background. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1327 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600043 Reprinted 1977 and 1990 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1974 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 . Contents Page A new park is born 1 Major Powell's river expeditions 4 Early history 9 Prehistoric people 9 Late arrivals 14 Geographic setting 17 Rocks and landforms 20 How to see the park 26 The high mesas 27 Island in the Sky 27 Dead Horse Point State Park 30 North entrance 34 Shafer and White Rim Trails 34 Grand View Point 36 Green River Overlook 43 Upheaval Dome 43 Hatch Point 46 Needles Overlook 47 Canyonlands Overlook 48 U-3 Loop 49 Anticline Overlook 50 Orange Cliffs 54 The benchlands 5g The Maze and Land of Standing Rocks 58 The Needles district 60 Salt, Davis, and Lavender Canyons _ 64 The Needles and The Grabens 73 Canyons of the Green and Colorado Rivers 85 Entrenched and cutoff meanders 86 Green River 87 Colorado River _ 96 Summary of geologic history H2 Additional reading H7 Acknowledgments H8 Selected references n% Index 123 VII Illustrations Page Frontispiece .
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Algae-Vulnerable Lakes in Utah Using R Plotting Tools to Visualize Water Quality Data
    Analysis of Algae-Vulnerable Lakes in Utah Using R Plotting Tools to Visualize Water Quality Data Sunayna Dasgupta and Aiswarya Rani Pappu Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Utah Abstract - Algae formation in water body is a direct B. CHL a quantification outcome of eutrophication. Eutrophication adversely Detection and quantification of chlorophyll a (CHL a) impacts the biological, physical, chemical and aesthetic has proven to be an effective way to assess the presence of components of a water body. It usually occurs due to algae in a water body [8]. Since algae have chlorophyll as increased rate of nutrient loading in the form of nitrogen their primary photosynthetic pigment, CHL a quantification and phosphorous. This study presents a comparative will provide useful information for measuring algal analysis of algae vulnerable lakes/waterbodies in Utah population density in a water body. Chlorophyll is the green State and categorize them based on Tropic State Index. pigment, which acts as an essential component to trap Keywords: eutrophication, algae, lakes sunlight and convert it to energy for metabolism. I. INTRODUCTION C. Algae vulnerable lakes in Utah A. Problem According to a recent report, three of Utah’s largest Algae are primarily aquatic, single or multicellular public drinking water systems, tap reservoirs, and twenty organisms containing chlorophyll. Examples of algae rivers have developed green biota in them. Utah Division of include: diatoms, green and red algae, and primitive Water Quality released a list of algae vulnerable water photosynthetic bacteria such as Cyanobacteria (blue green bodies [3]: algae). Algal biomass acts as one of the primary surface Huntington Creek* water quality criterion.
    [Show full text]
  • Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002
    Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 By Dale E. Wilberg and Bernard J. Stolp U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5233 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Salt Lake City, Utah 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 2329 West Orton Circle Building 810 Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Box 25286, Denver Federal Center http://ut.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 1-888-ASK-USGS iii CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Utah Fishing Proclamation
    m ftroiG wm "t let erkLte^ "IHferae you won't let go ®fl Wfo(B ttrout! The largest fish ever taken on a rod and reel, a 3,427 pound great white shark, was caught on Berkley Trilene — America's best selling fishing Rtf*rlrlctir line! SPORTSCASTLE SANDY PRICE 5600 S. 9th E., Murray 838 E. 9400 S. 730 W. Prive River Rd. 263-3633 571-8812 637-2077 ZCMICENTER CEDAR CITY SUGARHOUSE 2nd Level ZCMI Center 606 S. Main 1171 East 2100 So.. 359-4540 586-0687 487-7726 VERNAL OGDEN CITY MALL ROY 872 W. Main 24th & Washington 5585 So. 1900 W. 789-0536 399-2310 776-4453 FAMILY CENTER PROVO/UNIV. MALL ROCK SPRINGS 5666 S. Redwood Rd. 1300 S. State 1371 Dewar Drive SPORTING GOODS COMPANY 967-9455 224-9115 307-362-4208 ON THE COVER "Snagged"by Luke Frazier, oil, 16"x CONTENTS 20". J99I, To learn more about Frazier and his art work, turn to page 60, INTRODUCTION Strawberry Recreation Area Loyal Clark, US Forest Service 35 One of the most exciting Director's Message Scofield Reservoir/What the Timothy H. Provan, Director Future Holds Kevin Christophereon, things about fishing is its Division of Wildlife Resources 2 unpredictability, You simply Southeast Region Fisheries Manager 37 Utah's 1992 Fishing Season don't kno w when that big Why Rainbow Trout? Bruce Schmidt, Fisheries Chief 3 Joe Valentine, Assistant Fisheries one is going to strike, it Chief (Culture) ........39 could be on your next cast! 1992 FISHING RULES Willard Bay Shad 1992 Fishing Rules: Purpose Thomas D.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Canyonlands Research Bibliography Canyonlands Research Center 2002 Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Canyonlands National Park Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and Canyonlands National Park, "Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah" (2002). Canyonlands Research Bibliography. Paper 226. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research/226 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Canyonlands Research Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canyonlands Research Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDDLE SALT CREEK CANYON ACCESS PLAN CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK, UTAH _______________________________________________________________________ Summary Salt Creek is the largest drainage in the Needles district of Canyonlands National Park. The creek supports one of the most important riparian ecosystems in the park. It is also the heart of the Salt Creek National Register Archeological District, the area with the highest recorded density of archeological sites in the park. A tributary canyon contains the spectacular Angel Arch, a well-known geologic formation that for many years has been a destination point for park visitors. In 1998 the U.S. District Court for the State of Utah ruled, in a lawsuit filed by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, that the National Park Service violated the NPS Organic Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]