DOCSLIB.ORG

Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 Free FREE CHIEFTAIN MAIN BATTLE TANK 1965-2003 PDF Simon Dunstan,Peter Sarson | 48 pages | 01 Oct 2003 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781841767192 | English | United Kingdom The Untold Story of Chieftain Main Battle Tank | The Chieftain FV was the main battle tank of the United Kingdom during the s, s and s. A development of the Centurion and therefore a continuation of the Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 cruiser series, sharing a substantial commonality of parts with both its predecessor and successor. It was the "most formidable main battle tank in the world" with, at the time of its introduction in the most powerful main gun and most effective armour of any tank yet made. Faster than the Centurion, able to maintain its speed longer than the Leopard 1 and out-gunning its contemporaries, the Chieftain was also the first tank to enhance its already superior armour with composite armour add-ons, beginning with Chobham developed in the UK. It remained in service until replaced by the Challenger 1. The Chieftain was an evolutionary development of the successful cruiser line of tanks that had emerged at the end of the Second World War. Leylandwho had been involved in the Centurion tank, had built their own prototypes of a new tank design inand these led to a War Office specification for a new tank. The General Staff specification drew on the experience of Centurion tanks in the Korean Waras well as that of the Conqueror tank. The tank was expected to be able to engage the enemy at long range and from defensive positions, be proof against medium artillery. To this end, the gun was to have a greater angle of depression than the Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 degrees of Conqueror and better frontal armour. The tank was expected to achieve a firing rate of 10 rounds per minute in the first minute and six per minute for the following four. The first few prototypes were provided for troop trials fromthis identified a number of changes. Changes to address engine vibration and cooling resulted in redesign of the Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 hull. This increased the design weight to nearly 50 tons and as such the Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 which had been designed for 45 tons was strengthened. Track pads had to be fitted to protect roads from damage and the ground clearance increased. The design was accepted in the early s. Britain and Israel had collaborated on the development in its latter stages [11] with a view to Israel purchasing and domestically producing the vehicle. Two prototypes were delivered as part of a four-year trial. InNATO had specified that its forces should use multi-fuel engines. This was further hampered by the Horstmann coil spring suspensionwhich made it a challenge to drive cross country and provide the crew with a comfortable ride. Due to the cylinder linings being pressure fitted, coolant leaks within Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 cylinder block were common, resulting in white smoke billowing from the exhaust. In the late s, engine design changed with the introduction of Belzona which was used to improve the Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 seals. This meant better performance and an increased speed. However, cross-country performance remained limited. Several aspects of Chieftain design were trialled by the production of the FV "ton Centurion" with a reclined driver position and mantletless gun mounting. Chieftain display at the Bovington tank museum For security reasons, early prototypes had a canvas screen covering the mantlet and a sheet metal box mounted over the sloping glacis plate to disguise the configuration of the vehicle. The driver lay semi-recumbent in the hull when his hatch was closed down, which helped to reduce the profile of the forward glacis plate. The commander, gunner and loader were situated in the turret. To the left side of the turret was a large searchlight with infra-red capability in an armoured housing. The Leyland L60 engine is a two-stroke opposed piston design intended for multi-fuel use so that it could run on whatever fuel was available. Primary problems included, cylinder liner failure, fan drive problems and perpetual leaks due to vibration and badly routed pipework. However, as the engine power improved, the tank itself became heavier. The tank was steered by conventional tillers hydraulically actuating onto external brake discs. The discs worked via the epicyclic gearbox providing "regenerative" steering. In the turret, the loader was on the left and the gunner on the right of the gun with the commander behind the gunner. The suspension was of the Horstmann bogie type, with large side plates to protect the tracks and provide stand-off protection from hollow charge attack. Detail of the mm L11A5 rifled gun. The main armament was the mm L11A5 rifled gun. This differed from most contemporary main tank armament as it used projectiles and charges that were loaded separately, as opposed to a single fixed round. The charges were encased in combustible bags. Other tank guns, such Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 on the Conqueror, needed to store the spent shell cartridges or eject them outside. In the event of a hit penetrating the fighting compartment, the jacket would rupture, soaking the charges and preventing a catastrophic propellant explosion. This contains radios, ammunition, fire control equipment and has further stowage externally. The gun could fire a wide range of ammunition, but the most commonly loaded types were high explosive squash head HESHarmour-piercing discarding sabot APDSor practice round equivalents for both types. The Chieftain could store up to 64 projectiles though a maximum of 36 APDS, limited by the propellant stowage. The gun was fully stabilised, with a fully computerized integrated control system. The secondary armament consisted of a coaxial L8A1 7. This practice increases the rate of fire, but would be hazardous with one-piece ammunition. Chieftain had an NBC protection system, which Centurion lacked. The tank commander had a rotating cupola with nine vision blocks -giving all round view, plus the 7. The aiming systems were provided for both the gunner and the tank commander; they had 1x or 10x selectable magnification power, increasing to x15 in the Mk5 and beyond, and they were replaceable with IR vision systems for night operations 3x magnification power. The commander could rotate his cupola to bring Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 sight onto a target and then engage the mechanism that brought the turret round on to the correct bearing so that the gunner could complete the aiming. The commander's controls had Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 capability on those of the gunner. The left side of the turret had a large searchlight with an electrically controlled infra-red filter inside an armoured box, with a relatively long range — up to 1—1. This allowed engagements at much longer ranges, and also could be linked to the fire control system, allowing more rapid engagements and changes of target. The upgrade was not finished until the end ofwhen some examples but not the majority had the IR searchlight Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 with TOGS. These became the Mark 13 version. JuniWest Berlin18 June Chieftain proved Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 capable in combat and able to be upgraded with enhancements, both for overall improvement and to meet local requirements. The marque was continuously upgraded until the early s, when it was replaced by Challenger 1. Ex-Iranian Chieftain Mk. Chieftain target hulks at Lulworth Ranges The first model was introduced in Chieftain was supplied to at least six countries, including Iran, Kuwait, Oman and Jordan. An agreement for sales to Israel and local production was cancelled by the British Government in[20] despite considerable Israeli technical and tactical input into the development of the tank, especially the capacity to operate successfully in desert environments, and the provision for the tank to make good use of hull-down positioning. Two examples were delivered to and extensively trialled by the Israeli Armoured Corps. This experience spurred the creation of the indigenous Israeli Merkavathe development programme of which was led by General Israel Talwho had worked closely with the British in the Anglo-Israeli Chieftain project. It was in the Middle East that the Chieftain was to see all of its operational experience. First, it was used extensively by Iran during the Iran—Iraq War of —88, including the largest tank battle of the warwith mixed results as many suffered from chronic engine problems. Kuwait had Chieftans on the eve of the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait. Thirty-seven Chieftans of the Kuwaiti 35th Armored Brigade fought at the Battle of the Bridges against elements of the Iraqi Hammurabi and Medina divisions before withdrawing over the Saudi border [23] None of the brigade's tanks were lost in the battle, and the 35th Armored Brigade known as Al-Fatah became part of Joint Command Forces East during the Gulf War and was able to Chieftain Main Battle Tank 1965-2003 into Kuwait undefeated. The rest of the Kuwaiti Chieftains were either lost or captured. After the liberation of Kuwait, the ageing Chieftans were replaced by the Yugoslav M Mark 1 and Mark 2 models had a coaxial Browning. Sign In Don't have an account? Contents [ show ]. Retrieved 21 May Retrieved Armored Corps Magazine. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. World of Tanks. Aug 26, BBC News. September—October Armor magazine. Army Armor Center. FV Abbot AS UK unarmoured or non-fighting vehicles. Cold War tanks. Categories :. Cancel Save. Iran—Iraq WarGulf War. Leyland Motors. TN 12 [2].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modernizing the Opposed-Piston, Two-Stroke Engine For
    Modernizing the Opposed-Piston, Two-Stroke Engine 2013-26-0114 for Clean, Efficient Transportation Published on 9th -12 th January 2013, SIAT, India Dr. Gerhard Regner, Laurence Fromm, David Johnson, John Kosz ewnik, Eric Dion, Fabien Redon Achates Power, Inc. Copyright © 2013 SAE International and Copyright@ 2013 SIAT, India ABSTRACT Opposed-piston (OP) engines were once widely used in Over the last eight years, Achates Power has perfected the OP ground and aviation applications and continue to be used engine architecture, demonstrating substantial breakthroughs today on ships. Offering both fuel efficiency and cost benefits in combustion and thermal efficiency after more than 3,300 over conventional, four-stroke engines, the OP architecture hours of dynamometer testing. While these breakthroughs also features size and weight advantages. Despite these will initially benefit the commercial and passenger vehicle advantages, however, historical OP engines have struggled markets—the focus of the company’s current development with emissions and oil consumption. Using modern efforts—the Achates Power OP engine is also a good fit for technology, science and engineering, Achates Power has other applications due to its high thermal efficiency, high overcome these challenges. The result: an opposed-piston, specific power and low heat rejection. two-stroke diesel engine design that provides a step-function improvement in brake thermal efficiency compared to conventional engines while meeting the most stringent, DESIGN ATTRIBUTES mandated emissions
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks
    Tanks TANKS Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks Croatian Tanks Czech Tanks Egyptian Tanks French Tanks German Tanks Indian Tanks Iranian Tanks Iraqi Tanks Israeli Tanks Italian Tanks Japanese Tanks Jordanian Tanks North Korean Tanks Pakistani Tanks Polish Tanks Romanian Tanks Russian Tanks Slovakian Tanks South African Tanks South Korean Tanks Spanish Tanks Swedish Tanks Swiss Tanks Ukrainian Tanks US Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Tanks Yugoslavian Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Brazilian Tanks EE-T1 Osorio Notes: In 1982, Engesa began the development of the EE-T1 main battle tank, and by 1985, it was ready for the world marketplace. The Engesa EE-T1 Osorio was a surprising development for Brazil – a tank that, while not in the class of the latest tanks of the time, one that was far above the league of the typical third-world offerings. In design, it was similar to many tanks of the time; this was not surprising, since Engesa had a lot of help from West German, British and French armor experts. The EE-T1 was very promising – an excellent design that several countries were very interested in. The Saudis in particular went as far as to place a pre- order of 318 for the Osorio. That deal, however, was essentially killed when the Saudis saw the incredible performance of the M-1 Abrams and the British Challenger, and they literally cancelled the Osorio order at the last moment. This resulted in the cancellation of demonstrations to other countries, the demise of Engesa, and with it a promising medium tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Battle Tanks
    MODERN! BATTLE k r * m^&-:fl 'tWBH^s £%5»-^ a $ Oft > . — n*- ^*M. S»S Ll^MfiB bjfitai 'Si^. ~i • ^-^HflH Lf. O Q MODERN BATTLE TANKS Edited by Duncan Crow Published by ARCO PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. New York Published 1978 by Arco Publishing Company, Inc. 219 Park Avenue South, New York, N.Y. 10003 Copyright © 1978 PROFILE PUBLICATIONS LIMITED. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data MODERN BATTLE TANKS 1. Tanks (Military science) I. Crow, Duncan. UG446.5.M55 358'. 18 78-4192 ISBN 0-668-04650-3 pbk All rights reserved Printed in Spain by Heraclio Fournier, S.A. Vitoria Spain Contents PAGE Introduction by Duncan Crow Centurion VI Swiss Pz61 and Pz68 VII Vickers Battle Tank VII Japanese Type 61 and STB VIII Soviet Mediums T44, T54, T55 and T62 by Lt-Col Michael Norman, Royal Tank Regiment T44 2 T54 3 Water Crossing 9 Fighting at Night 10 T55 and T62 ... 12 Variants 12 Tactical Doctrine 15 The M48-M60 Series of Main Battle Tanks by Col Robert J. Icks, AUS (Retired) In Battle 19 M48 Development 22 M48 Description 24 Hybrids 26 The M60 32 The Shillelagh 32 The M60 Series 38 Chieftain and Leopard Main Battle Tanks by Lt-Col Michael Norman, Royal Tank Regiment Development Histories 41 Chieftain (FV4201) 41 Leopard Standard Panzer 52 Chieftain and Leopard Described 60 Later Developments by Duncan Crow ... 78 . S-Tank by R. M. Ogorkiewicz Origins of the Design 79 Preliminary Investigations 80 Component Development 81 Suspension and Steering 83 Armament System 87 Engine Installation 88 Probability of Survival 90 Pre-Production Vehicles 90 Production Model 96 Tactical performance .
    [Show full text]
  • 3D CFD Combustion Simulation of a Four-Stroke SI Opposed Piston IC Engine
    3D CFD Combustion Simulation of a Four-Stroke SI Opposed Piston IC Engine Maria da Conceição Rodrigues Martins Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Aeronáutica (Ciclo de estudos integrado) Orientador: Prof. Doutor Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Proença Brójo Setembro de 2020 ii Dedication To my father Adelino Rodrigues Martins. ”A good head and good heart are always a formidable combination. But when you add to that a literate tongue or pen, then you have something very special.” Nelson Mandela iii Acknowledgments I am eternally grateful to my mother for the sacrifices she made for me. To my brothers and sisters, Zé, Rosária, Hirminia and Fernando, for their support and dedication that inspired me to go on. A big thank you to my supervisor, Professor Francisco Brójo for the pacience and guidence. I wish to thank all my family, for their kindness and encouragement over the years. I want to thank my friends for making me feel at home. A special thanks to Cristiano for being my special friend. iv Resumo O motor alternativo de combustão interna desempenha um papel importante no mundo dos trans- portes, existindo ainda poucas configurações alternativas com sucesso comercial. Relativamente a aplicações em aeronaves ligeiras, onde as baixas vibrações são de extrema importância, os mo- tores boxer têm predominado o mercado. O aumento do custo do combustível e o aumento da preocupação do público com as emissões de poluentes levaram a um maior interesse em novas alternativas. Nos últimos anos, com o surgimento de novas tecnologias, técnicas de pesquisa e materiais, o motor de pistões opostos surgiu como uma alternativa viável ao motor convencional de combustão interna em algumas aplicações, inclusive na área aeronáutica.
    [Show full text]
  • Tank & Combat Vehicle Recognition Guide
    TANK & COMBAT VEHICLE RECOGNITION GUIDE Christopher F. Foss HarperCollinsPublishers In the USA for information address: HarperCollinsPafa//s/?ers 10 East 53rd Street New York NY 10022 In the UK for information address: HarperCollinsPw6//s/7ers 77-85 Fulham Palace Road Hammersmith London W6 8JB First Published by HarperCollinsPfy6//s/7ers 2OOO © Christopher F. Foss 2OOO 13579 10 8642 Design: Rod Teasdale All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the publishers. Printed in Italy Contents 6 Introduction 58 TM-800 Romania 122 M41 USA 60 T-90 Russia 124 Stingray USA TANKS 62 T-80 Russia 126 M-84 Yugoslavia 10 TAM Argentina 64 T-64 Russia 12 SK105 Austria 66 T-72 Russia TRACKED APCS/WEAPONS CARRIERS 14 Type85-ll China 70 T-62 Russia 130 Steyr 4K 7FA Austria 1 6 Type 80 China 72 T-54/55 Russia 132 Saurer4 K Austria 1 8 Type 69 China 76 PT-76 Russia 134 BMP-23 Bulgaria 20 Type 59 China 78 K1 S Korea 136 YW531H China 22 Type 62 China 80 S-tank Sweden 138 YW531 China 24 Type 63 China 82 IKV-91 Sweden 140 Type 77 China 26 AMX-13 France 84 Pz68 Switzerland 142 AMX-VCI France 28 AMX-30 France 86 Challenger 2 UK 144 AMX-10P France 30 Leclerc France 90 Challenger UK 146 Marder 1 Germany 32 Leopard 2 Germany 92 Scorpion UK 148 Jaguar tank destroyer Germany 36 Leopard 1 Germany 96 Khalid UK 150 Wiesel 1 Germany 40 Arjun India 98 Chieftain UK 152 Boragh i i ; 1 1 1 42
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Wobble Plate Opposed Piston Axial Engines for Increased Efficiency
    energies Article The Potential of Wobble Plate Opposed Piston Axial Engines for Increased Efficiency Paweł Mazuro and Barbara Makarewicz * Department of Aircraft Engines, Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 22 October 2020; Published: 26 October 2020 Abstract: Recent announcements regarding the phase out of internal combustion engines indicate the need to make major changes in the automotive industry. Bearing in mind this innovation trend, the article proposes a new approach to the engine design. The aim of this paper is to shed a new light on the forgotten concept of axial engines with wobble plate mechanism. One of their most important advantages is the ease of use of the opposed piston layout, which has recently received much attention. Based on several years of research, the features determining the increase in mechanical efficiency, lower heat losses and the best scavenging efficiency were indicated. Thanks to the applied Variable Compression Ratio (VCR), Variable Angle Shift (VAS) and Variable Port Area (VPA) systems, the engine can operate on various fuels in each of the Spark Ignition (SI), Compression Ignition (CI) and Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI)/Controlled Auto Ignition (CAI) modes. In order to quantify the potential of the proposed design, an initial research of the newest PAMAR 4 engine was presented to calculate the torque curve at low rotational speeds. The achieved torque of 500 Nm at 500 rpm is 65% greater than the maximum torque of the OM 651 engine of the same 1.8 L capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Opposed Piston Geared Hypocycloid Engine
    UNIVERSIDADE DA BEIRA INTERIOR Faculdade de Engenharia Development of an Opposed Piston Geared Hypocycloid Engine Alexandre José Rosa Nunes Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia Aeronáutica (ciclo de estudos integrado) Orientador: Prof. Doutor Francisco Miguel Ribeiro Proença Brojo Covilhã, Outubro de 2017 ii Dedication This work is dedicated to my mother who always supported me unconditionally in all my endeavours, to my sister who always pushed me to be a better brother and a better man and to my father whose critical thinking and engineering prowess in all his projects were my role model and gave me the tools to become who I am today. “What we usually consider as impossible are simply engineering problems… there’s no law of physics preventing them.” Michio Kaku “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” Leonardo Da Vinci “There’s only one way to do thing. The right way.” José Nunes (my father) iii iv Resumo O motor convencional biela-manivela domina a indústria com escassas alternativas a conseguirem terem sucesso comercial. Em aplicações aeronáuticas onde o balanceamento do motor é crítico para reduzir as vibrações induzidas, motores com a configuração ‘boxer’ foram desenvolvidos para minimizar este problema. O crescente custo de combustível e preocupação com as emissões de gases poluentes levou a um aumento no interesse por motores alternativos onde os ambos os motores de pistões opostos e engrenagem hipocicloidal apresentam algumas vantagens sobre os motores de biela-manivela convencionais. Neste estudo é feita uma comparação entre dois motores de pistões opostos, o primeiro com um conjunto biela-manivela e o segundo com engrenagem hipocicloidal, seguido de uma proposta de desenho de um motor de pistões opostos hipocicloidal para ser usado em aplicações aeronáuticas.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing the Opposed-Piston Engine for More Efficient Military Ground Vehicle Applications
    2012 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 14-16, MICHIGAN MODERNIZING THE OPPOSED-PISTON ENGINE FOR MORE EFFICIENT MILITARY GROUND VEHICLE APPLICATIONS Laurence Fromm Dr. Randy Herold John Koszewnik Dr. Gerhard Regner Achates Power, Inc. San Diego, CA ABSTRACT This paper provides a brief historical look at opposed-piston, two-stroke (OP2S) engines and their use in military applications. It also highlights the engine’s fundamental architectural advantages. In addition, the paper introduces the Achates Power opposed-piston engine, providing detailed, measured results of its power density, thermal efficiency and low heat rejection. Furthermore, the paper includes an overview of the fundamental challenges of OP2S engines, along with a discussion of how Achates Power has addressed these issues. Finally, the paper demonstrates that the operating characteristics of the Achates Power opposed-piston engine allow for optimizing the power density of the entire vehicle propulsion system as defined by Charles Raffa, Ernest Schwarz and John Tasdemir [1]. INTRODUCTION commercial and passenger vehicle markets, high thermal Opposed-piston engines have a long history, starting with the efficiency, high specific power and low heat rejection make the Junkers Jumo 205 diesel aviation engine from the 1930s and Achates Power opposed-piston engine ideally suited for continuing today in marine diesel engines. Each cylinder has military applications as well. two facing pistons that come together at top dead center and move outward upon combustion. Since the pistons cyclically expose or occlude the exhaust and intake ports, there is no DESIGN ATTRIBUTES valve train, camshaft, pushrods, rocker arms, valves, valve Several design attributes of the Achates Power opposed- springs, valve keepers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • DSLP Master Template 100427
    BEST IN CLASS: 440HP SECOND-GENERATION 6.7L POWER STROKE THE WORLD’S LARGEST DIESEL MAGAZINE ELECTRONICALLY REPRINTED FROM JULY 2014 BUILD IT RIGHT ULTIMATE POWER PLAN FOR YOUR DURAMAX 600HP 13-SECOND ’05 SUPER DUTY BULLETPROOF 6.0L OIL COOLER B&W on black background Color on black background Color SPECIAL EVENTS SECTION WORLD AG EXPO THE WORK TRUCK SHOW 10-SECOND, CUMMINS-POWERED 2014 EVENTS CALENDAR LI’L RED EXPRESS CLEAN DIESEL TRACKED FIGHTING VEHICLES ’13-’14 RAM POWER-ADDER CHIEFTAIN VS. FV423 DIESELPOWERMAG.COM B&W on white background B&W on white Color on white background on white Color BY JASON GONDERMAN n PHOTOS: JASON GONDERMAN, DINA COOPER, AND COURTESY OF BULLET PROOF DIESEL BIG BOY TOYS A PAIR OF TRACKED BRITISH FIGHTING VEHICLES f you’ve never been enlisted, then odds are good you really Germany before being retired from active service in 1993. In 1997, have no idea just how impressive a modern battle tank the Chieftain was transitioned to civilian life in the United States really is. From early on, young boys are drawn to them, and and joined the Bullet Proof Diesel fleet in late 2011. grown men yearn to someday sit in the driver seat. The raw The Chieftain alone didn’t satisfy the Neal brothers’ addiction to power and sheer destructive force they wield is what draws tracked British fighting vehicles, so in 2013 they added an FV423 us in, like flies to honey. There are not many diesel-powered Armored Personnel Carrier to the collection. While not quite as Ivehicles on the planet that reach the same level of awesome.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing the Opposed-Piston, Two-Stroke Diesel Engine for More Efficient Commercial Vehicle Applications
    MODERNIZING THE OPPOSED-PISTON, TWO-STROKE DIESEL ENGINE FOR MORE EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE APPLICATIONS Dr. Gerhard Regner Director, Applications Engineering Achates Power, Inc. 4060 Sorrento Valley Boulevard San Diego, CA 92121 Co-Authors: John Koszewnik Fabien Redon Eric Dion Chief Technical Officer VP, Performance & Emissions VP, Mechanical Systems © 2012 Achates Power, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 MODERNIZING THE OPPOSED-PISTON, TWO-STROKE DIESEL ENGINE FOR MORE EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE APPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION Opposed-piston engines have a long history, starting with the Junkers Jumo 205 [1] die- sel aviation engine from the 1930s and continuing today in marine diesel engines. Each cylinder has two facing pistons that come together at top dead center and move outward upon combustion. Since the pistons cyclically expose or occlude the exhaust and intake ports, there is no valve train. Camshafts, pushrods, rocker arms, valves, valve springs, valve keepers, etc., are not required. Because the intake and exhaust ports are at the op- posite ends of the cylinder, opposed-piston engines have efficient, uniflow scavenging. Opposed-piston (OP) engines, when properly sized and configured, have inherent ther- modynamic advantages [2]. Due to the high thermal efficiency and lack of cylinder heads, OP engines have lower heat rejection to coolant. Moreover, as a two-stroke en- gine, they have inherently high specific power output. By eliminating cylinder heads and the valve train, OP engines cost less than conventional four-stroke engines. Achates Power was formed in 2004 to modernize the opposed-piston engine, and has demonstrated breakthroughs in combustion and thermal efficiency, achieved through more than 3,000 hours of dynamometer testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a 4 Stroke Spark Ignition Opposed Piston Engine for Further Research in This Area
    Open Eng. 2018; 8:337–343 Research Article Jorge P. Gregório and Francisco M. Brójo* Development of a 4 stroke spark ignition opposed piston engine https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2018-0039 for further research in this area. Opposing piston engines Received Mar 13, 2018; accepted Jul 09, 2018 were successfully used in almost all civil and military fields, where they set records of low consumption and high Abstract: The purpose of this project was to develop a low- specific power, which still remain so many years later, de- cost OP engine, 4-stroke, gasoline by joining two single- spite the undeniable progress in this field [1]. However, cylinder reciprocating internal combustion engines with two major obstacles were encountered: the first related to side valves on the block, removing the heads. The chosed the restrictions imposed on the emissions of internal com- engine was Model EY15 of Robin America. Joining these bustion engines (2 stroke opposing piston engines signifi- two engine blocks together made possible to build an cantly exceed the legal limits in force, which led, for some opposed-piston engine (OPE) with two crankshafts. In this time, to a minor interest in its development [2]), while the new engine, the combustion chamber is confined to the second is conditioned by the current economic crisis and space inside the cylinder between the piston heads and the times of austerity imposed by the international situa- the chamber between the valves. The pistons move in the tion (creating difficulties in investment on research of this cylinder axis in opposite directions, a feature typical of type of engines).
    [Show full text]
  • Opposed-Piston Engine Renaissance Power for the Future
    Opposed-Piston Engine Renaissance Power for the Future Jean-Pierre Pirault and Martin Flint Background; Paradigm Shift Diesel 2-stroke opposed-piston engines, known as “OPEs” or “OPs”, are substantially simpler, more compact and have lower weight than equivalent powered 4-stroke engines. OPEs are characterised by use of pairs of pistons operating with opposed motions Fig.1 Fairbanks Morse OP Diesel Engine Cross-Section in a common cylinder without need of a cylinder head (Fig.1) and, therefore, avoid the thermal losses, cost, thermal efficiency, potential low emissions, power complexity and durability issues of 4-stroke cylinder density and cost advantages versus the emission heads and poppet valvetrain. Induction and exhaust compliant four-stroke diesel, particularly for transport processes are through ports (Fig.1) located in opposite applications. ends of the liner, thus allowing a very thorough purging of the cylinder. The combustion chamber is The OPE configuration is extremely flexible in terms formed by the two piston crowns in the centre of the of hardware architecture, ranging from pairs of pistons cylinder liner, with injectors located on the side of the in a common cylinder linked by geared crankshafts cylinder liner. Various arrangements have been used (Fig.2), as used in the record-breaking Junkers Jumo for connecting and driving the two opposed motion 205 and 207 aviation engines from c1930-1945, pistons, all providing perfect or near perfect balance, some also having zero cyclic torque recoil, and some also avoiding load transmission into the crankcase. Opposed-piston engines have been manufactured successfully since 1890 in Germany, USA, U.K., France and Russia; they have been used globally and extensively for ground, marine and aviation applications.
    [Show full text]