1433 CYTOKINES and FEVER Bruno Conti, Iustin Tabarean, Cristina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1433 CYTOKINES and FEVER Bruno Conti, Iustin Tabarean, Cristina [Frontiers in Bioscience 9, 1433-1449, May 1, 2004] CYTOKINES AND FEVER Bruno Conti, Iustin Tabarean, Cristina Andrei and Tamas Bartfai Harold L. Dorris Neurological Research Center, Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Cytokines as endogenous pyrogenic and antipyretic agents 3.1. Interleukin 1 beta and the Interleukin 1 system 3.2. Tumor Necrosis Factor 3.3. Interleukin 6 3.4. Interleukin 1Receptor Antagonist 3.5. Interleukin 10 4. LPS and TLR: confluence of IL-1 and LPS signaling 5. Actions of cytokines on the hypothalamic thermoregulation 5.1. Actions of peripheral cytokines 5.2. Actions of cytokines formed in the CNS 6. Effects of pyrogenic cytokines on the firing rate of neurons in the preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus area (POA/AH) 7. Conclusion 8. Acknowledgements 9. References 1. ABSTRACT Cytokines are highly inducible, secreted proteins temperature-sensitive neurons in the preoptic hypothalamic mediating intercellular communication in the nervous and region involved in thermoregulation, directly or via second immune system. Fever is the multiphasic response of mediators, remain to be fully elucidated. elevation and decline of the body core temperature regulated by central thermoregulatory mechanisms 2. INTRODUCTION localized in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus. The discovery that several proinflammatory cytokines act as Fever is an induced increase of the body core endogenous pyrogens and that other cytokines can act as temperature caused by a regulated elevation of the antipyretic agents provided a link between the immune and temperature set point evoked by changes in the neuronal the central nervous systems and stimulated the study of the activity of components localized in the preoptic area of the central actions of cytokines. The proinflammatory hypothalamus. Because fever can be induced by a cytokines interleukin 1 (IL-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and the multitude of substances administered peripherally ranging tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) as well as the from inorganic to organic compounds or microbial and antiinflammatory cytokines interleukin 1 receptor mammalian proteins, the existence of a common antagonist (IL-1ra) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) have been endogenous fever mediator was postulated. Eventually, the most investigated for their pyrogenic or antipyretic action. much sought “endogenous pyrogen“ was found to be The experimental evidence demonstrating the role of these identical to the leukocyte activating factor (LAF), now secreted proteins in modulating the fever response is as most commonly known as interleukin 1 (IL-1), one of the follows: 1) association between cytokine levels in serum prototypic proinflammatory cytokines (see (1) for review). and CSF and fever; 2) finding of the presence of cytokine This finding led the way to the identification of the pyretic receptors on various cell types in the brain and and antipyretic properties of several cytokines and to the demonstration of the effects of pharmacological application investigation of their role as an endogenous mediator of the of cytokines and of their neutralizing antibodies on the febrile response. fever response; 3) fever studies on cytokine- and cytokine receptor- transgenic models. Studies on the peripheral and In the present review, we summarize the the central action of cytokines demonstrated that peripheral experimental evidence demonstrating the action and the cytokines can communicate with the brain in several ways effects on fever of some of the most extensively including stimulation of afferent neuronal pathways and investigated cytokines. While several cytokines have been induction of the synthesis of a non cytokine pyrogen, i.e. investigated for their pyrogenic action, including ciliary PGE2, in endothelial cells in the periphery and in the brain. neurotrophic factor, interleukin 2, interleukin 12 and Cytokines synthesized in the periphery may act by crossing interferon alpha, we will focus on the action of the three the blood brain barrier and acting directly via neuronal major proinflammatory cytokines: interleukin 1beta (IL- cytokine receptors. The mechanisms that ultimately 1beta), interleukin 6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha mediate the central action of cytokines and of LPS on the (TNF); and on those of the antiinflammatory cytokines: IL- 1433 Cytokines and fever system, we will often distinguish between their peripheral and central actions. 3. CYTOKINES AS ENDOGENOUS PYROGENIC AND ANTIPYRETIC AGENTS Cytokines are intercellular signaling proteins mainly produced by immuno-competent cells. Their primary function is the regulation and the coordination of immune responses. Expression of several cytokines and their receptors were also demonstrated in the central nervous system where they are produced by glial or neuronal cell types. In the CNS, cytokines are believed to function as possible trophic factors, which can directly affect neuronal function and which also participate in local inflammatory processes. Several cytokines, including IL- 1beta, IL-6, TNF, IL-1ra and IL-10 were also demonstrated to have pyretic or antipyretic effects. Such conclusions came primarily from three different experimental evidences demonstrating: a) association between the levels of these cytokines in the serum and/or in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and fever; b) the effects of peripheral and central pharmacological application of the cytokine on core body temperature; c) cytokine action in studies on transgenic Figure 1. Convergence of IL-1 and LPS signaling. animals overexpressing or null mutated for a specific Schematic representation of how IL-1 and LPS action both cytokine or its receptor; d) cytokine action in experiment activate the same intracellular signal transduction pathway. employing specific neutralizing antibodies; e) autonomic IL-1 beta and the members of IL-1 family of ligands: IL- and behavioral responses in establishing and maintaining 1alpha/beta and IL-1ra act through the IL-1Type I receptor, fever response to cytokines and other pyrogens were also a heterodimer of the IL-1RI and its accessory protein instrumental. Although not a major mechanism of IL1RAcP. Binding of agonist, IL-1beta or IL-1alpha thermoregulation in homeothermic animals they can induces the recruitment of the cytosolic adaptor protein, regulate core body temperature by combined use of both MyD88 or its analogs and initiates the activation of the autonomic and behavioral mechanism: i.e. the animals may IRAK/TRAF pathway leading to the activation of the seek out cooler or warmer places during the different transcription factor NF-B and subsequently to phases of fever response to conserve the body’s energy transcriptional stimulation of multiple genes including reserve (2). those coding for COX2 and iNOS and, that are involved in the production of potent inflammatory mediators such as In evaluating the effects of cytokines, it is PGE2 and NO and to the auto induction of IL-1beta important to consider not only the experimental approach synthesis, respectively. LPS, bound to the LPS binding utilized, but also some peculiar features of these protein protein can activate the same transduction pathway upon molecules. Cytokines are among the most highly inducible stimulation of the TLR4 receptor belonging to the same proteins known. Their expression level can go from 10-15– family of Toll receptors as the IL-1type 1 receptor and 10-12 M, barely detectable levels, to 10-9–10-7 M in a matter utilizing the same IRAK/TRAF pathway leading to the of 30-90 minutes in response to bacterial, viral, activation of the transcription factor NF-B with inflammatory or stress stimuli. In addition, cytokines can transcriptional consequences as described above (see text regulate each others production. For instance, IL-1beta is for details). Thus LPS can act directly at TLR4 and/or it one of the most potent inducers of TNF as well as of IL-1ra can induce e.g. IL-1beta synthesis and then evoke similar and TNF is a powerful stimulator of IL-1beta production; responses via the IL-1type 1 receptor. Availability of LPS, finally both IL-1beta and TNF potently induce IL-6 (3, 4). LPS binding protein and of TLR4 are important in deciding Thus, while proinflammatory cytokines are normally how much of LPS signaling will occur through each branch synthesized and active in response to stimulation (i.e. of this bifurcated signaling leading to the production of the bacterial infection), their rapid and potent cross-induction same proinflammatory agents, IL-1beta, PGE2, NO renders the understanding of their hierarchical action difficult to investigate. In addition, their relevance with 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) and interleukin 10 (IL-10). respect to the fever response also depends on the possible IL-1beta and IL-6 are considered to be endogenous presence and dose of bacterial or viral pyrogens. pyrogens, while IL-1ra and IL-10 have antipyretic action. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram negative bacteria can TNF has been shown to have both pyrogenic and in fact activate the same intracellular signaling pathway as antipyretic effects depending on the experimental IL-1 and thus bypass its action if present at high dose (5). conditions. As these molecules can be synthesized and are Figure 1 illustrates the confluence of the IL-1 and LPS active in the immune as well as in the central nervous signaling via their respective Toll family receptor.
Recommended publications
  • Tamas Bartfai* and Bruno Conti INTRODUCTION
    Review TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2010) 10, 490–503 ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2010.50 Fever Tamas Bartfai* and Bruno Conti Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received February 26, 2010; Revised February 27, 2010; Accepted March 1, 2010; Published March 16, 2010 Measurement of body temperature remains one of the most common ways to assess health. An increase in temperature above what is considered to be a normal value is inevitably regarded as a sure sign of disease and referred to with one simple word: fever. In this review, we summarize how research on fever allowed the identification of the exogenous and endogenous molecules and pathways mediating the fever response. We also show how temperature elevation is common to different pathologies and how the molecular components of the fever-generation pathway represent drug targets for antipyretics, such as acetylsalicylic acid, the first “blockbuster drug”. We also show how fever research provided new insights into temperature and energy homeostasis, and into treatment of infection and inflammation. KEYWORDS: fever, antipyretic, interleukin, temperature, hypothalamus INTRODUCTION Can a frog or a snake run a fever? Is the ramp fever (stage fright) a real fever like that in malaria? Did Moses see the burning bush in febrile hallucination since malaria was endemic along the Nile? Is fever helping to fight infection? Should fever be treated or permitted? These are but a few of the questions we have received in the past 27 years from friendly, but incredulous, colleagues who have not understood why a well-trained scientist would “fiddle with fever”.
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Resistance & Type 2 Diabetes
    Doctoral College Metabolic & Cardiovascular Disease InsulinInsulin ResistanceResistance && TypeType 22 DiabetesDiabetes GUEST LECTURE by Olivia Osborn, PhD Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, USA Tuesday, 17.04.2012 17:00h SR 07.12, Preclinics Harrachgasse 21, 1st floor Inflammatory signaling pathways involved in the development of insulin resistance Abstract Obesity-associated chronic tissue inflammation is a key contributing factor to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. In the obese state, macrophages accumulate in insulin target tissues and secrete proinflammatory mediators that drive the development of insulin resistance. GPR21 is an orphan G protein coupled receptor that is highly expressed in macrophages as well as the brain. In adipose tissue, obesity-induced GPR21 expression occurs primarily in the stromal vascular cells. In mice fed a high fat diet, whole body knockout of GPR21 resulted in improved insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance as well as increased energy expenditure. Macrophage deletion of GPR21 mediates potent insulin sensitizing effects in vivo by repressing chemotaxis as well as reducing adipose tissue and liver tissue inflammation. Hypothalamic knockdown of GPR21 expression results in decreased body weight. In summary, reduced expression of GPR21 in the hypothalamus or macrophage both contribute to improved insulin sensitivity and suggest that GPR21 is an important target for the Schematic of integrative physiology. Nutrient development of new therapeutic
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2008 Volume Eleven / Number Two
    FALL 2008 VOLUME ELEVEN / NUMBER TWO NON-PROFIT U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT 751 SAN DIEGO, CA A PUBLICATION OF THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE Office of Communications—TPC30 10550 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, California 92037 www.scripps.edu PUBLISHER: Keith McKeown EDITOR: Mika Ono DESIGN: Studio 32 North PRODUCTION: Studio 32 North Kevin Fung COVER ILLUSTRATION: Christopher Silas Neal INTERIOR ILLUSTRATIONS: Meg Mateo Ilasco PORTRAIT PHOTOGRAPHY: Dana Neibert PRINTING: Precision Litho A SPECIAL THANKS: Greg Kovsky of Southern California Yacht Sales for the use of “Lost Soul.” Copyright © 2008. Published by TSRI Press™ “Only through funding from the Skaggs Institute could such high- THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE A NEW CLASS OF DRUGS FOR A WIDE RANGE OF INDICATIONS risk, high-reward studies be pursued A catalytic antibody discovery made at Scripps Research has formed the basis of the acquisition of biotechnology venture CovX by Pfizer. Empowered by in today’s funding compelling results in his laboratory’s development of a new class of drugs, environment. Scripps Research Professor Carlos Barbas III, Ph.D., set out to found CovX in CARLOS BARBAS III, Ph.D. 2002. He teamed up with his colleague Scripps Research President Richard VOLUME ELEVEN / NUMBER TWO FALL 2008 A. Lerner, M.D., with whom he had developed a unique and powerful class of catalytic antibodies. This work offers a groundbreaking way to physically combine antibodies, which are large, soluble molecules that remain in the body for long periods of 21 time, with small molecule drugs and peptides, which can kill disease-causing cells, but may be expelled from the body too quickly to be effective as a FEATURES: ALSO: therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Galanin Gaianin
    WENNER-GREN CENTER INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM SERIES VOLUME 58 GALANIN GAIANIN A New Multifunctional Peptide in the Neuro-endocrine System Proceedings of an International Symposium at the Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, June 14-16, 1990 Edited by Tomas Hokfelt Department of Histology and Neurobiology Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden Tamas Bartfai Department of Biochemistry, ArrheniusLaboratory University of Stockholm, Sweden David Jacobowitz Laboratory of Clinical Science NIMH, Bethesda, USA David Ottoson Wenner-Gren Center Foundation Stockholm, Sweden M MACMILLAN PRESS Scientific & Medical ©The Wenner-Gren Center 1991 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover 1st edition 1991 978-0-333-56427-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WlP 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published 1991 by MACMILLAN ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 978-1-349-12666-8 ISBN 978-1-349-12664-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-12664-4 ISSN 0-0083-7989 A catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library. Contents Preface ix Participants X Vilctor Mutt by Bertil Aberg xvi Part I Discovery, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into the Roles of the Inflammatory Mediators IL-1, IL-18 and PGE2 in Obesity and Insulin Resistance
    Insights into the roles of the inflammatory mediators IL-1, IL-18 and PGE2 in obesity and insulin resistance Insights into the roles of the inflammatory mediators IL-1, IL-18 and PGE2 in obesity and insulin resistance Olivia Osborna, Hermann Gramb, Eric P. Zorrillac, Bruno Contia, Tamas Bartfaia a The Harold L. Dorris Neurological Research Institute and Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, La Jolla, California, USA b Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland c Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA No financial support to declare. Summary Body weight homeostasis is regulated by central and peripheral mechanisms, in which cytokines appear to have an important role. The circulating levels of the cytokines interleukin 1 (IL-1) and interleukin 18 (IL-18), and of inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), amongst others, are elevated in obese individuals. The low-grade inflammation associated with obesity may contribute to the development of insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. This review highlights results of studies in mice which indicate important roles for these proinflammatory cytokines during the development of obesity and insulin resistance, and in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Key words: obesity; insulin resistance; diabetes; inflammation; interleukin 1; IL-1; IL-1Ra; interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; interleukin 18; IL-18; prostaglandin E2; PGE2 Introduction During the past three decades the United States and Western Europe, and also Asian countries, have witnessed a dramatic increase in the prevalence of obesity. Currently almost two-thirds of American adults (66.3%) are overweight; of these 32.4% are obese [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • WCBR Program 02
    Welcome to the Thirty-Sixth Annual Winter Conference on Brain Research The Winter Conference on Brain Research (WCBR) was founded in 1968 to promote free exchange of information and ideas within neuroscience. It was the intent of the founders that both formal and informal interactions would occur between clinical and laboratory-based neuroscientists. During the past thirty years neuroscience has grown and expanded to include many new fields and methodologies. This diversity is also reflected by WCBR participants and in our program. A primary goal of the WCBR is to enable participants to learn about the current status of areas of neuroscience other than their own. Another objective is to provide a vehicle for scientists with common interests to discuss current issues in an informal setting. On the other hand, WCBR is not designed for presentations limited to communicating the latest data to a small group of specialists; this is best done at national society meetings. The program includes panels (reviews for an audience not neces- sarily familiar with the area presented), workshops (informal discussions of current issues and data), and a number of posters. The annual conference lecture will be presented at the Sunday breakfast on January 26. Our guest speaker will be Dr. Michael E. Phelps, Professor and Chair, Department of Molecular and Medi- cal Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles. The title of his talk will be Molecular Imaging of Biology in vivo from Mouse to Patient and from Metabolism to Gene Expression. On Tuesday, January 28, a town meeting will be held for the Salt Lake City community, at which Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • DARPP-32, a Dopamine- and Adenosine 3’5Monophosphate-Regulated Phosphoprotein: Regional, Tissue, and Phylogenetic Distribution
    The Journal of Neuroscience May 1986, 6(5): 1469-1461 DARPP-32, A Dopamine- and Adenosine 3’5Monophosphate-Regulated Phosphoprotein: Regional, Tissue, and Phylogenetic Distribution Hugh C. Hemmings, Jr. and Paul Greengard Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021 Rabbit antisera and mouse monoclonal antibodies have been or in nervous tissue from representative members of several in- prepared to bovine DARPP-32 (dopamine; and adenosine 3’:5’- vertebrate classes. monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein, M, = 32,000), and used to study its regional, tissue, and phylogenetic distributions. The stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by dopamine act- The antibodies, none of which distinguished between dephos- ing at D-l dopamine receptors (Kebabian and Came, 1979) is pho-DARPP-32 and phospho-DARPP32, were characterized believed to result in physiological changes that are mediated by and used to develop a sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay the activation of CAMP-dependent protein kinase and the con- for DARPP-32. The radioimmunoassay, in conjunction with im- comitant phosphorylation of specific substrate proteins (for re- munolabeling of SDS/PAGE transfers and immunoprecipita- views, see Hemmings et al., 1986a; Nairn et al., 1985; Nestler tion of phosphorylated tissue extracts, was used to measure im- et al., 1984). A marked variation has been demonstrated in the munoreactive DARPP-32 in microdissected regions of rat CNS, regional distribution of a distinct subset of neuronal substrate in peripheral nervous and non-nervous tissues, and in CNS tis- proteins for CAMP-dependent protein kinase in rat CNS (Walaas sue from various animal species. et al., 1983b, c).
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTIONS on PAUL GREENGARD (1925-2019) Met Paul Greengard in September 1974 During My Junior Year I at Yale College
    ACNP Bulletin American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 5034A Thoroughbred Lane, Brentwood, TN 37027 Tel: 615-324-2360 • Fax: 615-523-1715 • E-mail: [email protected] • www.acnp.org DECEMBER 2019 SPECIAL EDITION – PAUL GREENGARD, PH.D. MEMORIES REFLECTIONS ON PAUL GREENGARD (1925-2019) met Paul Greengard in September 1974 during my junior year I at Yale College. I completed a senior thesis in his laboratory and was fortunate to have the opportunity to remain at Yale for my MD-PhD training so that I could pursue my graduate dissertation research in Paul’s lab. Paul and I remained close—both scientifically and personally—ever since and he became a second father to me. I miss Paul terribly, but his legacy lives on not only based on his scientific contributions, but also with the literally hundreds of scientists around the world who think of Paul the same way I do. Paul made transformational contributions to our understanding of cell signaling, particularly in the nervous system. Before Paul, Dr. Greengard at the Nobel Laureate Celebration the field of neuroscience focused primarily on the electrical activity of nerve cells and on the generation of electrical synaptic potentials, with little attention paid to the biochemical processes that mediate or modulate such functions. Over the course of several decades, the Greengard laboratory provided the scientific evidence to support a radically more expansive view of neural signaling, establishing the central role of protein phosphorylation as the major mode of cell regulation—Greengard cascades—that control virtually all aspects of neuronal function, including the generation of neural and synaptic potentials, the structure of nerve cells, their metabolic state, and ongoing transcriptional and translational adaptations that maintain neuronal function over a lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE TAMAS BARTFAI 1948 Born in Budapest, Hungary, Swedish/US citizen 1966-1971 Studies in Physics and Chemistry at Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest 1971-1973 Graduate studies in the Department of Biochemistry at Stockholm University, (Chairman Lars Ernster, supervisor Bengt Mannervik) 1973 Ph.D.; Biochemistry 1975 Associate Professor of Biochemistry (Docent), Stockholm University 1986 Professor of Biochemistry (specialty Neurochemistry) 1992-1997 Chairman; Department of Neurochemistry and Neurotoxicology, Stockholm University 1996-2000 Head of Central Nervous System Research, Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel 1998-2000 SeniorVP, Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel 1999-2002 Professor of Medicinal Chemistry, The BERZELIUS CHAIR, (Predecessor: Bengt Samuelsson), The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden 2000-present Professor, Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 2000-2009 Director, The Harold L. Dorris Neurological Research Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 2005-present Chair, Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, (Predecessor: Floyd Bloom) The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA Professional Experience 1991-1996 Secretary: National Committee for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1994 Member Academiae Europaeae 2002 Member Hungarian Academy of Sciences 2004 AAAS fellow, “for pioneering work on neuropeptides” 2007 Member of Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Chemistry Section - - - - - 1974 Visiting scientist at Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Professor Shimon Gatt´s Laboratory 1976 Visiting scientist (Assistant Professor) at Yale University 1977 Medical School, Department of Pharmacology, Professor Paul Greengard´s Laboratory 1985 Visiting Professor at Neuropsychiatric Institute, UCLA, Professor Charles D. Woody´s Laboratory 1985 Fellow, The Neurosciences Institute, New York, Professor Gerald M. Edelman Laboratory 1996 Professor, College de France, Professor J-P.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Questions: the State of GPCR Research in 2004
    The state of GPCR research in 2004 (20 Questions) Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Jul;3(7):575, 577-626. PMID: 15272499 CONTENTS What new technologies are having the greatest impact on GPCR research, 578 1 and why? What tools and technologies for GPCR research would you most like to be available 583 2 in the future, and why? Tamas Bartfai 578 Jeffrey L. Benovic 582 What are the main pitfalls and advantages of currently used cell-based assay 585 3 systems for GPCRs? How will changing views of agonist and antagonist behaviour at GPCRs change the 588 4 way we view these receptors as therapeutic targets? Joël Bockaert 584 Richard A. Bond 590 Many predictions for heptahelical receptors have been based on using the 592 5 rhodopsin crystal structure as a template. How successful have these been? How close are we to having further GPCR structures, and what are the main 594 6 barriers to obtaining these? Michel Bouvier 591 Arthur Christopoulos 595 7 What big questions remain for GPCRs at the structure/function interface? 597 How widespread do you think GPCR heteromerization will turn out to be, 599 8 and how great a functional significance will it have? Olivier Civelli 598 Lakshmi A. Devi 601 Almost two-thirds of drugs on the market are thought to interact with GPCRs, 603 9 by far the largest family of targets, and yet new drugs targeting GPCRs are few and far between. Why? 10 What are the barriers to achieving specificity using GPCR ligands? 606 How will our increasing knowledge of interacting protein partners for GPCRs 607 Susan R.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Drug Development in Big Pharma
    Chapter 01: Why there will be new drugs despite the ongoing “crisis” of drug development in Big Pharma Pharmaceutical industry in crisis & consolidation Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical concern in the world, acquired the Ann Arbor research site in Michigan by purchasing Warner-Lambert/Parke-Davis in 2000. In 2007, Pfizer closed the site despite having just spent $2 billion to refurbish it earlier in the year. The TV news broadcasts of the time commented that the closure of this research site was motivated because “most medicines were already discovered.” Nothing could be further from the truth; this is why we believe that many more medicines will be discovered and used in the treatment of many more diseases in the future. Pfizer has made one more big acquisition since 2007, buying Wyeth for $49 billion in 2009. However, it has also closed numerous research sites as old and as prestigious as the site in Ann Arbor, which is now re-engineered by the University of Michigan as a science park. Pfizer has been perhaps rightly criticized for acquiring companies for rights to an approved product, not for the companies’ own research activities. It was not alone among the large pharmaceutical companies of the world in cutting research activities through to 2011. The major U.S. competitor Merck bought Schering-Plough for $41 billion in 2009, and also closed numerous research sites. Yet neither Pfizer nor Merck, nor any other Big Pharma companies, believe that there is no future in drug development. It is just that the industry is fumbling to find ways to accommodate the expectations of their “spoiled” stockholders, who have been used to double-digit growth and stable or increasing stock prices over the past four decades, yet neither such growth nor improving stock prices have been realized since 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Induced Prostaglandin E2 Pathway Is a Key Regulator of the Respiratory Response to Infection and Hypoxia in Neonates
    The induced prostaglandin E2 pathway is a key regulator of the respiratory response to infection and hypoxia in neonates Annika O. Hofstetter*, Sipra Saha*†, Veronica Siljehav*, Per-Johan Jakobsson‡, and Eric Herlenius*§ *Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden; †Centre for Structural Biochemistry, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, 141 57 Huddinge, Sweden; and ‡Department of Medicine, Karolinska Proteonic Center, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden Edited by Tamas Bartfai, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 24, 2007 (received for review January 2, 2007). Infection during the neonatal period commonly induces apnea epi- induced by IL-1␤ (5). PGE2 itself depresses breathing in fetal and sodes, and the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1␤ may serve as a critical newborn sheep in vivo (17–19) and inhibits respiration-related mediator between these events. To determine the mechanism by neurons in vitro (5). Furthermore, EP3 receptors (EP3R) for PGE2 which IL-1␤ depresses respiration, we examined a prostaglandin E2 are located in the NTS and RVLM (20, 21). (PGE2)-dependent pathway in newborn mice and human neonates. The present study provides evidence that IL-1␤ adversely affects ␤ IL-1 and transient anoxia rapidly induced brainstem-specific micro- central respiration via mPGES-1 activation and PGE2 binding to somal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) activity in neonatal mice. brainstem EP3R, resulting in increased apnea frequency and failure Furthermore, IL-1␤ reduced respiratory frequency during hyperoxia to autoresuscitate after a hypoxic event. and depressed hypoxic gasping and autoresuscitation in mPGES-1 wild-type mice, but not in mPGES-1 knockout mice.
    [Show full text]