L. Ron Hubbard Guide to the Dictionary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

L. Ron Hubbard Guide to the Dictionary Technical Dictionary of Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard Guide to the Dictionary This is the long awaited and much heralded Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary. It contains and defines almost all of the words and abbreviations used in connection with auditing technology and with the training of auditors to date in Dianetics and Scientology. Many words have several definitions taken from various periods of the development of Dianetics and Scientology. A large amount of L. Ron Hubbard’s books, tape lectures, articles and technical bulletins etc. were researched for many years by a team of researchers. The period from 1950 to 1975 was heavily consulted for the terms and their definitions. The student can readily see the progressive development through time of the vocabulary of Dianetics and Scientology by its Source and Founder, L. Ron Hubbard as well as the changes that have come about through his continued research. More important however, is the fact that all of the materials of the subjects remain valid and in force today. In compiling this dictionary the researchers and editors have chosen to omit the conventional use of the ellipsis (. .) which would indicate an intentional omission of words in the definition. This is so that each definition imparts a complete uninterrupted thought to the reader and allows him to form a concept of the word without distraction or the inclusion of data not contributory to the definition. The references at the end of each definition allow the reader to consult the Source of the definition if further information is desired. In addition to giving an understanding of the vocabulary of the subjects and clearing up misunderstood words and abbreviations in connection with Dianetics and Scientology, there is a further major use for this dictionary; The student requiring information about any area of Dianetics or Scientology need only look up the words connected with that area and he will be provided with references to appropriate material for further study of that area. As the Tone Scale is referred to in many definitions a full Tone Scale appears at the end of the dictionary before the reference summary. The Editors Introduction In the early sixties the research which I did on study and study materials brought so view the necessity of an accurate and modernized dictionary of Dianetics and Scientology. Despite the pressing need of this so many other research projects existed that I did not have an opportunity to personally engage upon this work of definitions. All of the grades and OT levels remained to be researched in full and therefore I relegated any dictionary compilations to staff action. Almost all the words used in Dianetics and Scientology are defined in the early bulletins in which they first appeared. However, a complete dictionary is a vital necessity and use of it can mean the difference between understanding and not understanding; being able to be an auditor and not being one. Philosophy has always had the liability of gathering to itself a great many new words and labels. The reason for this is that the philosopher finds phenomena in the physical universe or in the mind or humanities which have not hitherto been observed or properly identified. Each one of these tends to require a new word for its description. In actual fact this cycle of new observations requiring new labels is probably the growth of language itself. Language is obviously the product of unsung observers who then popularized a word to describe what had been observed. The system which has been followed in Dianetics and Scientology in labelling phenomena or observed things was originally to make verbs into nouns or vice versa. The practice of developing new nomenclature was actually held to a minimum. However, it was found that many old words in the field of philosophy, when used, conveyed to people an entirely new idea. The exactness of Dianetics and Scientology required a more precise approach. This approach was achieved by special naming with an eye to minimal confusion with already supposed or known phenomena. The Dianetics and Scientology vocabulary is nevertheless not large. It is interesting that many Dianetics and Scientology terms have moved sideways into society and are in common use today. In the search which brought about Dianetics and Scientology many new phenomena were encountered which resulted, for the first time, in a workable, predictable science of the humanities. The introduction of a few words of new meaning to make this possible seems to be a small price to pay. It is the hallmark of the Dianeticist and Scientologist that he uses these words even in his common conversation with ease and facility. The student who is not completely conversant with these exact words as contained in this dictionary will find himself drowsing over his bulletins and utterly appalled when he tries to obtain results which are not forthcoming due to his lack of understanding of some small word. The liability of misunderstood words is not a monopoly of Dianetics and Scientology. In broader university subjects you will find that not only the vocabulary of the subject, but the subject itself is often completely and totally misunderstood, leaving the student ARC broken, upset and even riotous. Whereas the subject of misunderstood words or understood words is, in itself, a broad one, it does not comprise, in itself, the entire technology of study. I hope this dictionary will be of use. Not only in clarifying some of the phenomena of existence, but also speeding greatly your study of Dianetics and Scientology and the results you will be able to attain thereby. a A, affinity. (5904C08) AA, attempted abortion. (DMSMH, p. 245) A=A=A, 1. anything equals anything equals anything. This is the way the reactive mind thinks, irrationally identifying thoughts, people, objects, experiences, statements, etc., with one another where little or no similarity actually exists. (Scn AD) 2. all differences are probably identities and all identities are different and all similarities are imaginary. We have a broad dissertation on this in Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health as it affects insane behavior. Everything is everything else. Mr. X looks at a horse, knows it’s a house, knows it’s a school teacher, so when he sees a horse he is respectful. (HCO PL 26 Apr 70R) 3. this is the behavior of the reactive mind. Everything is identified with everything on a certain subject. (PDC 20) ABCD, 1. these are the steps designation of the second run through of R3R as given in the commands for R3R. Usually the auditor simply writes ABCD on his worksheet which shows he has given the command required and designated under A, under B, under C, under D, as and when he gives them to the preclear. (LRH Def. Notes) 2. after the first time through an incident in Dn and when pc has recounted it, the auditor tells pc, A. “Move to the beginning of the incident.” B. “Tell me when you are there.” C. When pc has said he is, “Scan through to the end of the incident.” D. “Tell me what happened.” (BTB 6 May 69R II) ABERRATE, to make something diverge from a straight line. The word comes basically from optics . (Dn 55!, p . 65) —adj. Aberrated, departed from rationality, deranged. (EOS, p. 14) ABERRATED BEHAVIOR, destructive effort toward pro-survival data or entities on any dynamic or effort toward the survival of contra-survival data or entities for any dynamic. (Scn 0-8, p. 86) See ABERRATION. ABERRATED PERSONALITY, the personality resultant from superimposition, on the genetic personality of personal characteristics and tendencies brought about by all environmental factors, pro-survival and aberrational. (SOS Gloss) ABERRATION, 1. a departure from rational thought or behavior. From the Latin, aberrare, to wander from; Latin, ab, away, errare, to wander. It means basically to err, to make mistakes, or more specifically to have fixed ideas which are not true. The word is also used in its scientific sense. It means departure from a straight line. If a line should go from A to B, then if it is “aberrated” it would go from A to some other point, to some other point, to some other point, to some other point, to some other point and finally arrive at B. Taken in its scientific sense, it would also mean the lack of straightness or to see crookedly as, in example, a man sees a horse but thinks he sees an elephant. Aberrated conduct would be wrong conduct, or conduct not supported by reason. When a person has engrams, these tend to deflect what would be his normal ability to perceive truth and bring about an aberrated view of situations which then would cause an aberrated reaction to them. Aberration is opposed to sanity, which would be its opposite. (LRH Def. Notes) 2. an aberrated person wanders from his self- determined course. He no longer goes where he wants to go now, but goes where he has wanted to go in the past. His course is, therefore, not rational, and he seems to go wherever the environment pushes him. He has as many aberrations as he has hidden contrasurvival decisions in his past. (Abil 114A) 3. mental derangement, any irrational condition. (DMSMH, p. 102) 4. the aberree’s reactions to and difficulties with his current environment. (DTOT, p. 127) 5. the manifestation of an engram, and is serious only when it influences the competence of the individual in his environment. (Scn Jour 28-G) 6. the degree of residual plus or minus randomity accumulated by compelling, inhibiting or unwarranted assisting of efforts on the part of other organisms or the physical (material) universe.
Recommended publications
  • The Miscavige Legal Statements: a Study in Perjury, Lies and Misdirection
    SPEAKING OUT ABOUT ORGANIZED SCIENTOLOGY ~ The Collected Works of L. H. Brennan ~ Volume 1 The Miscavige Legal Statements: A Study in Perjury, Lies and Misdirection Written by Larry Brennan [Edited & Compiled by Anonymous w/ <3] Originally posted on: Operation Clambake Message board WhyWeProtest.net Activism Forum The Ex-scientologist Forum 2006 - 2009 Page 1 of 76 Table of Contents Preface: The Real Power in Scientology - Miscavige's Lies ...................................................... 3 Introduction to Scientology COB Public Record Analysis....................................................... 12 David Miscavige’s Statement #1 .............................................................................................. 14 David Miscavige’s Statement #2 .............................................................................................. 16 David Miscavige’s Statement #3 .............................................................................................. 20 David Miscavige’s Statement #4 .............................................................................................. 21 David Miscavige’s Statement #5 .............................................................................................. 24 David Miscavige’s Statement #6 .............................................................................................. 27 David Miscavige’s Statement #7 .............................................................................................. 29 David Miscavige’s Statement #8 .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “Tipping” to Private Foundation Status
    EOTJ-18-05-cover.qxp_Layout 1 8/14/18 9:14 AM Page 1 September/October 2018 “Tipping” to Private Foundation Status Constitutionality of Religion Code Sections Impermissible Private Benefit EOTJcoverads.qxp_Journal covers 8/16/18 11:48 AM Page 2 EOTJ-18-09-01-TOC.qxp_PTS-06-06-000-MH&TOC 8/16/18 11:51 AM Page 1 September/October 2018 Volume 30, No. 2 ARTICLES FROM PUBLIC CHARITY TO PRIVATE FOUNDATION: HOW TO HANDLE THE “TIPPING” PROBLEM 3 CHRISTOPHER M. HAMMOND RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS— CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CODE PROVISIONS 17 BRUCE R. HOPKINS IDENTIFYING AND NAVIGATING IMPERMISSIBLE PRIVATE BENEFIT IN PRACTICE 26 JOHN TYLER, EDWARD DIENER, AND HILLARY BOUNDS TENANT IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCES PAID TO EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS 33 RICHARD A. NEWMAN THE DISAPPEARING 60% DEDUCTION— NEW CHARITABLE GIVING LIMITS ARE NOT AS GENEROUS AS THEY APPEAR 36 BRAD BEDINGFIELD AND NANCY DEMPZE THE “SIMPLE” PRIVATE FOUNDATION— CHANGING ONE LIFE AT A TIME 42 JOHN DEDON EOTJ-18-09-01-TOC.qxp_PTS-06-06-000-MH&TOC 8/16/18 11:51 AM Page 2 Editors-in-Chief Editorial Staff Joseph E. Lundy Sharon W. Nokes Managing Editor Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis The Pew Charitable Trusts Daniel E. Feld, J.D. Philadelphia, PA Washington, DC [email protected] Director, International Board of Advisors Tax & Journals Robert Gallagher, J.D., CPA Ronald Aucutt Barbara L. Kirschten McGuire Woods, LLP Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering Desktop Artist McLean, VA Washington, DC Anthony Kibort Wendell R. Bird James J. Knicely Cover Design Bird & Loechl Knicely & Associates Christiane Bezerra Atlanta, GA Williamsburg, VA VP, Editorial, Milton Cerny Michael S.
    [Show full text]
  • Colour, Screen, Read Only (Unsuitable for Print) (CS, Colour, Screen Compiled 7
    DDEETTOOXX Colour, Screen, read only (unsuitable for print) (CS, Colour, Screen Compiled 7. September 2018 DETOX II 07.09.18 a) Table of Contents, in Checksheet order: 1. 68-08-28 DRUGS..........................................................................................................................................1 2. 68-08-29 DRUG DATA..................................................................................................................................3 3. 69-10-17 DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS....................................................................................5 4. 80-10-11 DRUGS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AUDITING GAINS................................................................9 5. 78-02-06 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN REPLACES THE SWEAT PROGRAM ..................................19 6. 78-02-06 THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN – ERRATA AND ADDITIONS ...............................................41 7. 80-05-21 PURIFICATION RUNDOWN CASE DATA ..................................................................................45 8. 80-01-03 PURIFICATION RUNDOWN AND ATOMIC WAR.......................................................................65 DETOX III 07.09.18 DETOX IV 07.09.18 b) Table of Contents, in chronological order: 1. 68-08-28 DRUGS..........................................................................................................................................1 2. 68-08-29 DRUG DATA..................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • No Science in $Cientology About Says It All
    ¡ ¢¤£ ¥ ¡ £ ¦¨§ © Scientology books are sold as scientific. For example: What the cult calls Book One, titled Dianetics The Modern Science of Mental Health. There's also A History of Man, billed by L. Ron Hubbard (the Founder of Scientology) as "a cold-blooded and factual account of your last sixty trillion years". However, there is no scientific validation of the contents in these books. Yes, No Science in $cientology about says it all. Despite the fact that Dianetics and Scientology together are nearly 50 years old, there has never been any scientific verification of the principles that the Scientology cult teaches. In fact, the only two experiments in existence to address Scientology principles have shown that these principles do not hold up under experimental evaluation. Of course, this may not be surprising - the first time Hubbard wrote about Dianetics, it was published in Astounding Science Fiction Magazine (the May 1950 issue), not a scientific journal. You can see the cover of the Astounding magazine in question here: http://www.primenet.com/~cultxpt/cos.htm The first experiment was Dianetic Therapy: An Experimental Evaluation by Harvey Jay Fischer. This study was submitted in 1953 to Fischer's sponsoring committee as part of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Education he was pursuing. From the abstract of Dianetic Therapy: An Experimental Evaluation by Harvey Jay Fischer: "Dianetic proponents specifically claim effectiveness in only three areas: intellectual functioning, mathematical ability, and personality
    [Show full text]
  • Edge 2012 Believer
    RADAR Oxford Brookes University – Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository (RADAR) Edge, P Believer beware: the challenges of commercial religion Edge, P (2012) Believer beware: the challenges of commercial religion. Legal Studies, 2012 doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2012.00252.x This version is available: https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/6590f97d-7ced-17b3-ffd0-9b2596d14303/1/ Available in the RADAR: October 2012 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. This document is the preprint version of the journal article. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it. go/radar www.brookes.ac.uk/ Directorate of Learning Resources Applied Study of Law and Religion Group . School of Law. Believer beware. The challenges of commercial religion. Professor Peter W Edge, Oxford Brookes University, [email protected] Forthcoming, Legal Studies. For further information: Email the author: [email protected] View his profile: http://www.brookes.ac.uk/profiles/staff/peter_edge Introduction. In this paper I will argue that in a wide range of circumstances religious activity and commercial activity may overlap, leading to what may fairly, albeit novelly, be categorised as commercial religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Scientology/Dianetics
    Inside Scientology/Dianetics How I Joined Dianetics/Scientology and Became Superhuman by Robert Kaufman (1995 revision) The first work ever to disclose the secret Scientology materials. Foreword: Son of Scientology Epigraph Endorsements A message from the author Robert Kaufman A Letter in Scientologese Preface Introduction: Dianetics, the Ultimate Do-It-Yourself Book PART I: The Franchise Raw Meat Preclear Marty The New York Org Saint Hill The OT II The Dianetics Course Auditing Live Preclears A Scientology Party Life on the Outside An Evening at the Franchise Scientology Cognition PART II: The Hill The Manor The Power Process Solo Audit Class The Tapes OTs and Other Superhumans Solo Packs A-D Bruce Twin Checkouts The Bank The Sea Org Albert Ward Practical Drills Final Preparations and Solo Audit Out-Going Lines PART III: The AOUK The Upper Levels The Special Briefing Course PART IV: In the Wog World Scientology Sickness Beyond the Wall of Fire Life in Present Time Postscripts APPENDICES: Scientologiana A. Dramatic Personae Update B. English Translation of "Scientologist's Letter" C. Scientology Today D. The High Cost of Infinity E. Processing Revisited F. A Message from L. Ron Hubbard, May 9, 1984 G. From Hubbard's Axioms H. Success Stories I. Security Checks J. The Clearing Course Materials (1968 and Perhaps Subsequent) K. A Tempered Word for Scientology L. Whither Scientology? M. Scientologese N. First Abridged Unapproved Dictionary of Scientologese Robert Kaufman died of cancer on 29 July 1996. During the final years of his life, Robert Kaufman revised the manuscript of his book, Inside Scientology (published in 1972), but could not sell it to a publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientology: CRIMINAL TIME TRACK ISSUE I by Mike Mcclaughry 1999
    Scientology: CRIMINAL TIME TRACK ISSUE I by Mike McClaughry 1999 The following is a Time Track that I put together for myself and some friends at the time, in 1999. I originally used the pseudonym “Theta” at the request of Greg Barnes until he was ready to “go public” with his defection from Scientology. I also used the pseudonym “Theta 8-8008” around this same time period. Bernd Luebeck, Ex-Guardian’s Office Intelligence and then Ron’s Org staff ran the website www.freezone.org. In 1999, just after my time track was released privately, Bernd used it on his website as-is. He later expanded on my original time track with items of interest to himself. Prior to my doing this time track, Bernd, (nor anyone else involved with Scientology on the internet), had ever thought of the idea to do things this way in relation to Scientology. Mike McClaughry BEGIN An open letter to all Scientologists: Greetings and by way of introduction, I am a Class 8, OT 8, who has been in the Church for many decades and I am in good standing with the Church. I am a lover of LRH’s technology and that is my motivation in writing you and in doing what I am now doing. It came to my attention, sometime in the not too distant past, that the current top management of the Church, particularly David Miscavige, is off source. One of the ways he is off-source is that he has made the same mistake as the old Guardian’s Office staff made, engaging in criminal activities to solve problems.
    [Show full text]
  • L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER of DIANETICS and SCIENTOLOGY Volume POWER & SOLO
    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY Volume POWER & SOLO CONFIDENTIAL Contents Power Power Processes 19 Power Badges 20 Power Processes 21 Six Power Processes 22 The Standard Flight To Power & VA 23 Gain The Ability To Handle Power 25 The Power Processes 26 Power Process 1AA (Pr Pr 1AA) 32 Power Process 1 (Pr Pr 1) 32 Power Process 2 (Pr Pr 2) 32 Power Process 3 (Pr Pr 3) 32 Power Process 4 (Pr Pr 4) 32 Power Process 5 (Pr Pr 5) 33 Power Process 6 (Pr Pr 6) 33 The Power Processes All Flows 34 Data On Pr Prs 37 End Phenomena And F/ Ns In Power 38 L P - 1 40 Low TA Cases 41 Power Plus 43 Restoring The Knowledge You Used To Have 45 Power Plus Release - 5A Processes 46 Power Plus Processes All Flows 47 Rehab Of VA 48 GPM Research Material 51 Editors Note 53 Routine 3 54 Current Auditing 59 Routine 3M Rundown By Steps 61 Correction To HCO Bulletin Of February 22, 1963 66 R3M Goal Finding By Method B 67 Routine 2 And 3M Correction To 3M Steps 13, 14 68 Vanished RS Or RR 71 The End Of A GPM 74 R2- R3 Corrections Typographicals And Added Notes 79 Routine 3M Simplified 80 R3M2 What You Are Trying To Do In Clearing 89 Routine 3M2 Listing And Nulling 92 Routine 3M2 Corrected Line Plots 96 R3M2 Redo Goals On This Pattern 103 Routine 3M2 Directive Listing 107 Routine 3M2 Handling The GPM 109 Routine 3M2 Tips - The Rocket Read Of A Reliable Item 113 Routine 3 An Actual Line Plot 115 7 Routine 3 Directive Listing Listing Liabilities 120 Routine 3 Correction To HCOB 23 Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Qualifications Division 5
    CONTENTS QUALIFICATIONS DIVISION 5 (CORRECTION DIVISION) Part 1 FORM, PURPOSES, IDEAL SCENES, PRODUCTS AND STATISTICS 31 July 1965 Purposes of the Qualifications Division 1 30 Sept. 1965 Statistics for Divisions (excerpt: Qual Division 5) 2 Circa 1965 Qualifications Division 5 Org Board Outline 3 20 Nov. 1965 The Promotional Actions of an Organization (excerpt: Qual Division 5) 4 15 Dec. 1965 Additions to "The Promotional Actions of an Organization" si see—4 2 Nov. 1967 Qualifications Division, Departments of Examinations, Review and Certifications and Awards 5 2 Nov. 1967 Chaplain's Section (excerpt) 7 14 Mar. 1968 Policies Governing the Qualifications Division (reissued 8 May 1968) 86 17 June 1968 ARC Break Registrars and Auditors (corrects 2 Nov. 1967) 7 29 Oct. 1968 Stat for Class VIII C/S Qual 7 29 Mar. 1970 Qual Stats Revised (amends 30 Sept. 1965) (excerpt) 8 3 June 1970 Orders to Divisions for Immediate Compliance (excerpt: Division V) 9 17 June 1970 OIC Change-Cable Change (cancels 29 Mar. 1970, amends 30 Sept. 1965) (excerpt) 10 15 July 1970 Reorganization of the Correction Division 11 8 Aug. 1970 Reorganization of the Correction Division (amends 15 July 1970) 14 22 Sept. 1970 Ideal Scenes and Statistics for Correction Division Five 18 5 Feb. 1971 Org Gross Divisional Statistics Revised (excerpt: Qual Division 5) (amends 30 Sept. 1965, 17 June 1970 & 22 Sept. 1970) 22 7 Feb. 1971 FEBC Org Board Division 5 23 2 Aug. 1971 Additional Qual Stat 28 14 Aug. 1971 Div V Mini Qual Org Board (revised 5 Sept. 1971 & 19 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Indents to Pay
    OPINION • 4 Bulk rate change will TUESDAY drive away students. April 11, 1995 ENTEQTAINMENT • 7 Extreme's latest leaves listeners wondering. Volume 74 No. 52 6POQT6 *9 YSU sweeps doubieheader at Cleveland State. youngstown estate xiniv^r.siLy indents to pay MARLY KOSINSKI assistant news editor AND ANDREA VAGAS editor in chief Over the last few months, YSU has faced many financial difficul• ties, including tuition increases and budget cuts. According to a report presented at yesterday's Student Government meeting, a decision was made by YSU officials to reduce the bulk rate of full-time student hours in an effort to increase the University's revenue. This decision to reduce the bulk rate means that instead of full- time students each paying $768 per quarter for 12-16 hours, they will now have to pay an additional $81 per credit for every hour over 15. This reduction is the first in a series to be implemented over the AMY WINGER r next seven years. The report stated that the YSU administration even• tually would like students to pay for every additional hour over 12. According to Nizar Diab, Student Government's financial appro• Off-campus exodus priations chair, the reduction of the bulk rate will affect approximately 3,000 full-time students. He said, 'This decision could cause students to drop to part-time status or even drop out of college completely be• Although student enrollment has cause it is too expensive." been decreasing steadily, traffic Diab added, "I am totally opposed to it. It will bring student en• rollment down and hurt students who are trying to graduate early.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L
    The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard FOUNDER OF DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY Volume VIII 1972-1976 _____________________________________________________________________ I will not always be here on guard. The stars twinkle in the Milky Way And the wind sighs for songs Across the empty fields of a planet A Galaxy away. You won’t always be here. But before you go, Whisper this to your sons And their sons — “The work was free. Keep it so.” L. RON HUBBARD L. Ron Hubbard Founder of Dianetics and Scientology EDITORS’ NOTE “A chronological study of materials is necessary for the complete training of a truly top grade expert in these lines. He can see how the subject progressed and so is able to see which are the highest levels of development. Not the least advantage in this is the defining of words and terms for each, when originally used, was defined, in most cases, with considerable exactitude, and one is not left with any misunderstoods.” —L. Ron Hubbard The first eight volumes of the Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology contain, exclusively, issues written by L. Ron Hubbard, thus providing a chronological time track of the development of Dianetics and Scientology. Volume IX, The Auditing Series, and Volume X, The Case Supervisor Series, contain Board Technical Bulletins that are part of the series. They are LRH data even though compiled or written by another. So that the time track of the subject may be studied in its entirety, all HCO Bs have been included, excluding only those upper level materials which will be found on courses to which they apply.
    [Show full text]
  • FLATTENING a PROCESS a Lecture Given on 19 March 1964
    FLATTENING A PROCESS A lecture given on 19 March 1964 How are you today? Good. Thank you. What’s the date? Audience: 19th of March. 19 March. 19 March, 14. All right with you if I begin this lecture now? What would you like to know about today? Anything you want to know? Well, in view of the fact that you have no preference, I’ll talk to you about auditing. And this is some of the basic know-hows of auditing. Somewhere along the line, many an auditor lays aside some of his basic information on the subject of auditing. He hides it under his E-Meter, or something of the sort, and starts doing something silly and then wonders all of a sudden why he’s having trouble. And it’s very interesting how silly some of these things can be. Now, there was a subject called flattening a process. Now, this has been mostly forgotten. It’s even part of the Auditor’s Code, but it gets forgotten. It gets forgotten. And what you need to know about this—what you need to know about this—is that there are two aspects to ending a process. There are two aspects to this thing, and they are both concerned with what are you doing with the process? That’s the main question. What are you doing with the process? Well, what you are doing with it tells you how to end it and how you can end it. And these two things are: you’re trying to fix up the PC so he can be audited—that’s number one—and number two, you are trying to audit the PC.
    [Show full text]