DOCSLIB.ORG

Acanthophis Daudin, 1803)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acanthophis Daudin, 1803) An evaluation of the nomina for death adders (Acanthophis Daudin, 1803) ANGOR UNIVERSITY proposed by Wells & Wellington (1985), and confirmation of A. cryptamydros Maddock et al., 2015 as the valid name for the Kimberley death adder Ellis, Ryan J.; Kaiser, Hinrich; Maddock, Simon; Doughty, Paul; Wüster, Wolfgang Zootaxa PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 29/06/2021 Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Ellis, R. J., Kaiser, H., Maddock, S., Doughty, P., & Wüster, W. (2021). An evaluation of the nomina for death adders (Acanthophis Daudin, 1803) proposed by Wells & Wellington (1985), and confirmation of A. cryptamydros Maddock et al., 2015 as the valid name for the Kimberley death adder. Zootaxa, 4995(1), 161–172. Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 27. Sep. 2021 Zootaxa 4995 (1): 161–172 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4995.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:959FF3A5-63AD-496D-AB24-B704C998B8FF An evaluation of the nomina for death adders (Acanthophis Daudin, 1803) proposed by Wells & Wellington (1985), and confirmation of A. cryptamydros Maddock et al., 2015 as the valid name for the Kimberley death adder RYAN J. ELLIS1,2, HINRICH KAISER3, SIMON T. MADDOCK4,5,6, PAUL DOUGHTY1 & WOLFGANG WÜSTER7,* 1Collections & Research, Western Australian Museum, Welshpool WA 6016, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0631-0571 2Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9272-8204 3Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany; and Department of Biology, Victor Valley College, 18422 Bear Valley Road, Victorville, California 92395, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-9428 4Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5455-6990 5Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 6Island Biodiversity and Conservation Centre, University of Seychelles, Mahé, Seychelles 7 Molecular Biology and Evolution at Bangor, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW, United Kingdom *Corresponding author. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-4311 Abstract We assess the availability of four names proposed by Wells & Wellington (1985) for Australian death adders (Acanthophis). In agreement with previous literature, A. hawkei is an available name, whereas A. armstrongi, A. lancasteri, and A. schistos are not described in conformity with the requirements of Articles 13.1.1 or 13.1.2 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and are therefore considered nomina nuda. Consequently, A. cryptamydros Maddock et al., 2015, is confirmed as the valid name for the Kimberley death adder of Western Australia. We comment on the need for greater clarity in the Code, and emphasise that the responsibility for establishing the availability of new nomina rests with their authors, not subsequent researchers. Key words: Nomenclature, taxonomy, nomen nudum, Australia, Reptilia, Serpentes, Elapidae Introduction Death adders (genus Acanthophis Daudin, 1803) are a group of uniquely specialised Australasian elapid snakes best known for their morphological and ecological similarity to vipers (Shine 1980; Greene 1997; Shine et al. 2014). The species-level taxonomy of the genus has remained poorly understood, in part as a consequence of contributions by authors operating outside the peer-reviewed scientific literature (see Aplin 1999; Aplin & Donnellan 1999). Among these, Wells & Wellington (1985) proposed four new names for putative species of Acanthophis: A. armstrongi, A. hawkei, A. lancasteri, and A. schistos. None of the four descriptions provided any morphological or other descrip- tive information associated with the designated holotype specimens, and largely referred to the published works of other authors for diagnoses and descriptions, including specimen images. While these descriptions were initially ignored in the subsequent literature, the confirmation of considerable cryptic diversity in death adders (Aplin & Donnellan 1999; Wüster et al. 2005; Maddock et al. 2015) brought these names back into contention as potentially available nomina. This has resulted in taxonomic confusion and nomenclatural instability, particularly in the case of northern Australian Acanthophis, which had long been considered part of A. praelongus Ramsay, 1877 (e.g., Storr 1981; Cogger 1983, 2000; Ehmann 1992; Storr et al. 2002; Wilson & Swan 2003, 2013). Accepted by V. Deepak: 8 Jun. 2021; published: 29 Jun. 2021 161 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-N.C. 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Wells & Wellington (1985) named A. lancasteri from the Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA) and the ‘Top End’ of the Northern Territory (NT). Several authors (Shea 1987; Aplin 1999; Aplin & Donnellan 1999; Maddock et al. 2015; Wüster, 2021) have explicitly considered A. lancasteri a nomen nudum: the diagnosis was outsourced to Storr (1981), but in these authors’ view, Storr did not provide diagnoses compliant with Article 13 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (hereafter, the Code; ICZN 1999), making the species epithet lancasteri unavailable. Shea (1987: 258) identified A. lancasteri as one of the many species described by Wells & Wellington (1985), for which “the attempted diagnosis of new species on the basis of previously published photo- graphs or previously published descriptions [does] not provide a statement in words of characters that are purported to differentiate the taxon (Article 13a (i–ii),” and he further stated (p. 259) that “In a few of these cases, the publica- tion cited provides a diagnosis of the taxon in question as part of a redescription. However, in none of the instances cited above does such a diagnosis differentiate between the population described and the typical population.” Since the original publication of A. lancasteri, the name had not been used as valid in the scientific herpeto- logical literature (i.e., in peer-reviewed publications; Kaiser et al., 2013) until a plea for acceptance by Wellington (2016). The populations concerned were generally included in A. praelongus (e.g., Storr et al. 1986; Cogger 1986, 1992, 1996, 2000; Ehmann 1992; Storr et al. 2002; Wilson & Swan 2003, 2008, 2010, 2013) or, after the phylogeo- graphic study of Wüster et al. (2005), in A. rugosus by some (e.g., Eipper 2012; Cogger 2014). Maddock et al. (2015) found that death adders from the Kimberley region of WA constitute a separate species from the populations of the A. rugosus complex (sensu Wüster et al. 2005: 11) in the NT and elsewhere. Noting the status of A. lancasteri as a nomen nudum, they described this taxon as a new species, A. cryptamydros Maddock et al., 2015. However, Wellington (2016) argued that, contrary to Shea (1987) and Aplin (1999), Storr’s (1981) descrip- tion should be considered sufficient as the primary diagnosis to make the name A. lancasteri available, which would relegate A. cryptamydros to the status of its junior synonym. The result of this dispute is that the nomenclature of the Kimberley death adder is currently split in the scientific literature, with some sources, primarily field guides (Swan 2017; Wilson & Swan 2017, 2020; Cogger 2018; Eipper & Eipper 2019), regarding A. lancasteri as the valid name, whereas others (White 2016; Ellis 2017; Mirtschin et al. 2017; WHO 2017; Chapple et al. 2019; Altherr & Lame- ter 2020; Boundy 2020; de Solan et al. 2020; Wüster 2021) use the younger name A. cryptamydros. Databases are similarly divided: the Australian Reptile Online Database (Macdonald 2021), the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS 2020), the Reptile Database (Uetz et al. 2020), the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (Cogger et al. 2017), and the Western Australian Naturemap (DBCA 2020) are using A. cryptamydros, whereas the Australian Faunal Directory (ABRS 2020) uses A. lancasteri. Settling the status of contentious names requires careful analysis to assess their availability under the Code (e.g., Iverson et al. 2001). To alleviate the regrettable confusion over the scientific name of the Kimberley death adder, in the following paragraphs we analyse in detail the availability and validity of the nomen A. lancasteri under the Code. To further clarify the nomenclature of the genus, we also reanalyse the availability of the other three death adder names
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Darevskia Raddei and Darevskia Portschinskii) May Not Lead to Hybridization Between Them
    Zoologischer Anzeiger 288 (2020) 43e52 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Zoologischer Anzeiger journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcz Research paper Syntopy of two species of rock lizards (Darevskia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii) may not lead to hybridization between them * Eduard Galoyan a, b, , Viktoria Moskalenko b, Mariam Gabelaia c, David Tarkhnishvili c, Victor Spangenberg d, Anna Chamkina b, Marine Arakelyan e a Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, 33 Leninskij Prosp. 119071, Moscow, Russia b Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia c Center of Biodiversity Studies, Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia d Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia e Department of Zoology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia article info abstract Article history: The two species of rock lizards, Darevsia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii, belong to two different Received 19 February 2020 phylogenetic clades of the same genus. They are supposed ancestors for the hybrid parthenogenetic, Received in revised form Darevskia rostombekowi. The present study aims to identify morphological features of these two species 22 June 2020 and the potential gene introgression between them in the area of sympatry. External morphological Accepted 30 June 2020 features provided the evidence of specific morphology in D. raddei and D. portschinskii: the species Available online 14 July 2020 differed in scalation and ventral coloration pattern, however, they had some proportional similarities Corresponding Editor: Alexander Kupfer within both sexes of the two species. Males of both species had relatively larger heads and shorter bodies than females. Males of D. raddei were slightly larger than males of D.
    [Show full text]
  • Advice to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population
    The Minister included this species in the vulnerable category, effective from 11 May 2012 Advice to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on Amendment to the list of Threatened Species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Name Acanthophis hawkei The species is commonly known as the plains death adder. It is in the Family Elapidae. 2. Reason for Conservation Assessment by the Committee This advice follows assessment of information provided by a public nomination to list the plains death adder. The nominator suggested listing in the vulnerable category of the list. This is the Committee’s first consideration of the species under the EPBC Act. 3. Summary of Conclusion The Committee judges that the species has been demonstrated to have met sufficient elements of Criterion 1 to make it eligible for listing as vulnerable. 4. Taxonomy The plains death adder is conventionally accepted as a distinct species. The species has been formally described by Wells and Wellington (1985) and the subsequent genetic work by Wüster et al. (2005) allows the species to be defined by reference to a phylogenetic clade and accessioned sequences. A scientific institution has a specimen of the species (Northern Territory museum (R3677)) and the taxon is recognised as a distinct species by both the Northern Territory museum and the Queensland Museum. 5. Description The plains death adder is a robust terrestrial snake which grows to a maximum length of approximately 1.2 m (Wells and Wellington, 1985). The species’ dorsal side ranges in colour from shades of grey to a brownish-red, usually with wide, lighter bands across the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Venemous Snakes
    WASAH WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY of AMATEUR HERPETOLOGISTS (Inc) K E E P I N G A D V I C E S H E E T Venomous Snakes Southern Death Adder (Acanthophis Southern Death antarcticus) – Maximum length 100 cm. Adder Category 5. Desert Death Adder (Acanthophis pyrrhus) – Acanthophis antarcticus Maximum length 75 cm. Category 5. Pilbara Death Adder (Acanthophis wellsi) – Maximum length 70 cm. Category 5. Western Tiger Snake (Notechis scutatus) - Maximum length 160 cm. Category 5. Mulga Snake (Pseudechis australis) – Maximum length 300 cm. Category 5. Spotted Mulga Snake (Pseudechis butleri) – Maximum length 180 cm. Category 5. Dugite (Pseudonaja affinis affinis) – Maximum Desert Death Adder length 180 cm. Category 5. Acanthophis pyrrhus Gwardar (Pseudonaja nuchalis) – Maximum length 100 cm. Category 5. NOTE: All species listed here are dangerously venomous and are listed as Category 5. Only the experienced herpetoculturalist should consider keeping any of them. One must be over 18 years of age to hold a category 5 license. Maintaining a large elapid carries with 1 it a considerable responsibility. Unless you are Pilbara Death Adder confident that you can comply with all your obligations and licence requirements when Acanthophis wellsi keeping dangerous animals, then look to obtaining a non-venomous species instead. NATURAL HABITS: Venomous snakes occur in a wide variety of habitats and, apart from death adders, are highly mobile. All species are active day and night. HOUSING: In all species listed except death adders, one adult (to 150 cm total length) can be kept indoors in a lockable, top-ventilated, all glass or glass-fronted wooden vivarium of Western Tiger Snake at least 90 x 45 cm floor area.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Adders {Acanthophis Laevis Complex) from the Island of Ambon
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Herpetozoa Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 19_1_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuch Ulrich, McGuire Jimmy A., Yuwono Frank Bambang Artikel/Article: Death adders (Acanthophis laevis complex) from the island of Ambon (Maluku, Indonesia) 81-82 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 19(1/2) Wien, 30. Juli 2006 SHORT NOTE 81 O. & PINTO, I. & BRUFORD, M. W. & JORDAN, W. C. & NICHOLS, R. A. (2002): The double origin of Iberian peninsular chameleons.- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, London; 75: 1-7. PINHO, C. & FER- RAND, N. & HARRIS, D. J. (2006): Reexamination of the Iberian and North African Podarcis phylogeny indi- cates unusual relative rates of mitochondrial gene evo- lution in reptiles.- Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolu- tion, Chicago; 38: 266-273. POSADA, D. &. CRANDALL, K. A. (1998): Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution- Bioinformatics, Oxford; 14: 817-818. SWOFFORD, D. L. (2002): PAUP*. Phylogenetic analy- sis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Uderland, Massachusetts. WADK, E. (2001): Review of the False Smooth snake genus Macroprotodon (Serpentes, Colubridae) in Algeria with a description of a new species.- Bulletin National Fig. 1 : Adult death adder (Acanthophis laevis com- History Museum London (Zoology), London; 67 (1): plex) from Negeri Lima, Ambon (Central Maluku 85-107. regency, Maluku province, Indonesia). Photograph by U. KUCH. KEYWORDS: mitochondrial DNA, cyto- chrome b, Macroprotodon, evolution, systematics, Iberian Peninsula, North Africa SUBMITTED: April 1,2005 and Bali by the live animal trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Jemena Northern Gas Pipeline Pty Ltd
    Jemena Northern Gas Pipeline Pty Ltd Northern Gas Pipeline Draft Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 12 – MATTERS OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE Public August 2016 MATTERS OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE — 12 Contents 12. Matters of National Environmental Significance ............................................................. 12-1 12.1 Overview .................................................................................................................... 12-1 12.2 Relevant MNES ......................................................................................................... 12-2 12.2.1 Threatened species ............................................................................................ 12-2 12.2.2 Plains Death Adder (Acanthophis hawkei) ........................................................ 12-13 12.2.3 Carpentarian Antechinus (Pseudantechinus mimulus) ...................................... 12-18 12.2.4 Threatened species conclusion ......................................................................... 12-23 12.3 Risk assessment ...................................................................................................... 12-23 12.3.1 Potential impacts .............................................................................................. 12-23 12.3.2 Planning ............................................................................................................ 12-24 12.3.3 Construction ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Greek Herpetology
    Bonn zoological Bulletin Volume 57 Issue 2 pp. 329–345 Bonn, November 2010 A brief history of Greek herpetology Panayiotis Pafilis 1,2 1Section of Zoology and Marine Biology, Department of Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, Ilissia 157–84, Athens, Greece 2School of Natural Resources & Environment, Dana Building, 430 E. University, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI – 48109, USA; E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract. The development of Herpetology in Greece is examined in this paper. After a brief look at the first reports on amphibians and reptiles from antiquity, a short presentation of their deep impact on classical Greek civilization but also on present day traditions is attempted. The main part of the study is dedicated to the presentation of the major herpetol- ogists that studied Greek herpetofauna during the last two centuries through a division into Schools according to researchers’ origin. Trends in herpetological research and changes in the anthropogeography of herpetologists are also discussed. Last- ly the future tasks of Greek herpetology are presented. Climate, geological history, geographic position and the long human presence in the area are responsible for shaping the particular features of Greek herpetofauna. Around 15% of the Greek herpetofauna comprises endemic species while 16% represent the only European populations in their range. THE STUDY OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS IN ANTIQUITY Greeks from quite early started to describe the natural en- Therein one could find citations to the Greek herpetofauna vironment. At the time biological sciences were consid- such as the Seriphian frogs or the tortoises of Arcadia. ered part of philosophical studies hence it was perfectly natural for a philosopher such as Democritus to contem- plate “on the Nature of Man” or to write books like the REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS IN GREEK “Causes concerned with Animals” (for a presentation of CULTURE Democritus’ work on nature see Guthrie 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen D. Busack
    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH AND BIBLIOGRAPHY OF STEPHEN D. BUSACK Stephen D. Busack Rochester, New York SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 154 2018 . SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The first number of the SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE series appeared in 1968. SHIS number 1 was a list of herpetological publications arising from within or through the Smithsonian Institution and its collections entity, the United States National Museum (USNM). The latter exists now as little more than the occasional title for the registration activities of the National Museum of Natural History. No. 1 was prepared and printed by J. A. Peters, then Curator-in-Charge of the Division of Amphibians & Reptiles. The availability of a NASA translation service and assorted indices encouraged him to continue the series and distribute these items on an irregular schedule. The series continues under that tradition. Specifically, the SHIS series distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, and unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such an item, please contact George Zug [zugg @ si.edu] for its consideration for distribution through the SHIS series. Our increasingly digital world is changing the manner of our access to research literature and that is now true for SHIS publications. They are distributed now as pdf documents through two Smithsonian outlets: BIODIVERSITY HERITAGE LIBRARY. www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/15728 All numbers from 1 to 131 [1968-2001] available in BHL.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Colubroidea Snake Venoms by Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry: Evolutionary and Toxinological Implications
    RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003; 17: 2047–2062 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1148 Analysis of Colubroidea snake venoms by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry: evolutionary and toxinological implications Bryan G. Fry1,2*, Wolfgang Wu¨ ster3, Sheik Fadil Ryan Ramjan2, Timothy Jackson1, Paolo Martelli4 and R. Manjunatha Kini2 1Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia 2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore 119260, Singapore 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, Wales, UK 4Veterinary Department, Singapore Zoo, Mandai Rd., Singapore Received 12 June 2003; Revised 7 July 2003; Accepted 9 July 2003 The evolution of the venomous function of snakes and the diversification of the toxins has been of tremendous research interest and considerable debate. It has become recently evident that the evo- lution of the toxins in the advanced snakes (Colubroidea) predated the evolution of the advanced, front-fanged delivery mechanisms. Historically, the venoms of snakes lacking front-fanged venom- delivery systems (conventionally grouped into the paraphyletic family Colubridae) have been lar- gely neglected. In this study we used liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) to analyze a large number of venoms from a wide array of species representing the major advanced snake clades Atractaspididae,
    [Show full text]
  • Very Venomous, But...- Snakes of the Wet Tropics
    No.80 January 2004 Notes from Very venomous but ... the Australia is home to some of the most venomous snakes in the world. Why? Editor It is possible that strong venom may little chance to fight back. There are six main snake families have evolved chiefly as a self-defence in Australia – elapids (venomous strategy. It is interesting to look at the While coastal and inland taipans eat snakes, the largest group), habits of different venomous snakes. only mammals, other venomous colubrids (‘harmless’ snakes) Some, such as the coastal taipan snakes feed largely on reptiles and pythons, blindsnakes, filesnakes (Oxyuranus scutellatus), bite their frogs. Venom acts slowly on these and seasnakes. prey quickly, delivering a large amount ‘cold-blooded’ creatures with slow of venom, and then let go. The strong metabolic rates, so perhaps it needs to Australia is the only continent venom means that the prey doesn’t be especially strong. In addition, as where venomous snakes (70 get far before succumbing so the many prey species develop a degree of percent) outnumber non- snake is able to follow at a safe immunity to snake venom, a form of venomous ones. Despite this, as distance. Taipans eat only mammals – evolutionary arms race may have been the graph on page one illustrates, which are able to bite back, viciously. taking place. very few deaths result from snake This strategy therefore allows the bites. It is estimated that between snake to avoid injury. … not necessarily deadly 50 000 and 60 000 people die of On the other hand, the most Some Australian snakes may be snake bite each year around the particularly venomous, but they are world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2400 New Locality Record of the Red-Bellied Lizard, Darevskia Parvula
    Biyoloji / Biology DOI: 10.21597/jist.732691 Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(4): 2400-2405, 2020 Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(4): 2400-2405, 2020 ISSN: 2146-0574, eISSN: 2536-4618 New Locality Record of the Red-Bellied Lizard, Darevskia parvula (Lantz & Cyrén, 1913) s.l., from eastern Anatolia, Turkey Kamil CANDAN1,*, Serkan GÜL2, Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ1,3, Elif YILDIRIM CAYNAK1,3, Çetin ILGAZ1,3 ABSTRACT: Darevskia parvula is a rock lizard that is endemic for Anatolia. The known distribution range of the species is limited on eastern and northeastern Anatolia. Although many morphological studies have been carried out on the species, there are also molecular studies to construct its taxonomy in recent years. Four adult lizard specimens were collected from eastern Anatolia in 2016 during a herpetological field survey. We present a summary of a morphological features, and report new locality which is the westernmost record (Çayırlı Village, Erzincan) for D. parvula sensu lato in Turkey. Our finding largely extends the known distribution of the species. Key Words: Darevskia parvula, biodiversity, morphology, distribution, turkey 1 Kamil CANDAN (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-6934-3971), Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-1154-6757), Elif YILDIRIM CAYNAK (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-9614-5754), Çetin ILGAZ (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-7862-9106), Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Buca-İzmir, Turkey. 2 Serkan GÜL (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-0372-7462), Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Rize, Turkey. 3 Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-1154-6757), Elif YILDIRIM CAYNAK (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-9614-5754), Çetin ILGAZ (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-7862-9106), Dokuz Eylül University, Research and Application Center for Fauna Flora, Buca-İzmir, Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Adder (Deaf Adder)
    Death Adder (Deaf Adder) There are three major death adder species that occur in Australia, some more species have been described and named in Australia and are awaiting official acceptances; whatever that might mean. Death adders are found in all states of Australia excepting Victoria and Tasmania. In the early days of European settlement they were probably in Northern Victoria though perhaps no longer. Death adders also occur in New Guinea and some adjacent islands. The Common Death Adder (Acanthophis antarcticus) The Northern Death Adder (Acanthophis praelongus) The Desert Death Adder (Acanthophis pyrrhus) The death adder is not a true adder; it belongs to the family of snakes called the elapids (elapidae). Elapids are snakes that are usually described as having short, front fixed (not hinged) fangs. Death Adders are live bearers or viviparous (not egg layers). They never grow very long; a death adder of one meter in length would be classed as a monster. Their venom is primarily neurotoxic (effecting mostly the nervous system). The only antivenom to be used is specific Death Adder antivenom and in emergencies only would you use polyvalent antivenom (Australian universal antivenom). It is possible that the name Death Adder is a corruption of the term Deaf Adder. This snake was in days gone by, called also by this name. Most snakes in the world are totally deaf. The name given by the inhabitants of the Island of Crete to a snake is kouphos’, which means deaf in Greek, (kouphos’ is pronounced with the accent or emphasis on the last vowel). In Greek proper, a snake is called phidi and the plural is phidia.
    [Show full text]