Adec Preview Generated PDF File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 59: 117-123 (2000). DECAPOD CRUSTACEA OF CHRISTMAS ISLAND Gary J. Morgan Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia A total of 204 decapod crustacean species is listed shallow subtidal habitats of Christmas Island. The in Table 10. The list includes species recorded by genus Clibanarius appears to be absent, contrasting the previous workers noted below. The species with a previous report (Gibson-Hill, 1947a) of names are those currently used in the scientific populations of three species of Clibanarius in Flying literature and not necessarily the names cited by Fish Cove, a site well sampled for the present historical workers. The historical collections have survey (station 1). The extent of live coral appears not been examined and hence the accuracy of early to have diminished since the early studies of identifications cannot be ascertained. Christmas Island, and this may have affected the In comparison with other invertebrate groups, the faunal composition of many areas. crustacean fauna of Christmas Island, especially the The hermit crab family Paguridae is usually order Decapoda, has been well documented. regarded as relatively poorly represented in tropical Species of Crustacea have been recorded by Pocock seas and far less diverse or abundant than the (1887), Andrews (1900), De Man (1905), Calman Diogenidae. While less speciose on Christmas (1909), Balss (1934), Ward (1934), Gordon (1935), Island, the Paguridae comprised numerous Gibson-Hill (1947a; b), Tweedie (1947), George individuals of several small, cryptic species, often (1978) and Hicks et al. (1984). Most workers have aggregating under loose coral debris. Recent studies concentrated on the true crabs (Brachyura), with by the author indicate that Christmas Island is not particular emphasis on the terrestrial species, unique in this condition but rather that small although Morgan (1992) describes the hermit crabs. pagurids have been poorly collected from tropical The present survey was orientated towards the areas in the past. The definite identification of marine crustacean fauna, particularly of subtidal several species will require further study and will depths accessible only by SCUBA and hence poorly be the subject of a future paper. Orthopagurus harmsi sampled by previous workers. The marine hermit is a small commensal of serpulid worm tubes in crabs (families Diogenidae and Paguridae) and coral heads and was originally described from xanthoid crabs (families Xanthidae, Trapeziidae, Christmas Island (Gordon, 1935). Pilumnidae, Menippidae) were preferentially Two species of rock lobster, Panulirus peniciIlatus collected as these are dominant components of the and P. versicolor were collected, both having crustacean faunas of tropical intertidal and subtidal widespread distributions across the Indo-West waters, especially when associated with rocky and Pacific. A third species, P. longipes, is recorded for coral reefs. Dominant groups are xanthoid (80 Christmas Island by Calman (1909) and George species or subspecies), grapsid (20 species), and (1968). majid crabs (17 species), and hermit crabs (31 In the Brachyura, the families Majidae (decorator species). Seventy-five species are new records for crabs), Grapsidae (rock crabs) and superfamily Christmas Island. Xanthoidea (black-clawed crabs) are dominant in The general composition of the decapod terms of species diversity. Of the majids, crustacean fauna of Christmas Island is essentially Tylocarcinus dumerilii and Schizophrys aspera that expected for a tropical, oceanic Indo-West appeared quite common. Diversity of xanthoids is Pacific island environment. The crustacean fauna very high, as in most tropical reef areas of the Indo­ reflects the dominance of coral and coral rubble Pacific. Dominant genera are Pilodius, Liomera, habitats with relatively small areas of sand Trapezia and Tetralia, the latter two comprising substrate and the complete absence of mud and fine obligate symbionts of corals. silts. Grapsid crabs are a very obvious component of Hermit crabs are the most diverse of the Christmas Island intertidal and supratidal habitats anomuran fauna. The genera Calcinus and Dardanus and are quite well documented (eg. Hicks et al., are dominant in the Diogenidae both in terms of 1984). The present survey confirmed the presence numbers of species and individuals. Both are of a second species of Grapsus, G. albolineatus, characteristic genera of coral reef areas. previously recorded (as G. strigosus) by Calman In particular C. gaimardii, C. guamensis, C. minutus, (1909). C. sp. novo 1 and D. lagopodes are very common in Two species of Ocypodidae were collected during 118 G.J. Morgan this study, Ocypode ceratophthalma and O. cordimana, De Man, J.G. (1905). On species of Crustacea of the both recorded from Christmas Island by several genera Ptychognathus Stimps. and Palaemon Fabr. from previous workers. An additional species, O. kuhlii, Christmas Island. Proceedings of the Zoological Society has been reported by Tweedie (1947) and Gibson­ ofLondon 1905: 537-550. Hill (1947a) but was not found in this survey, nor is George, RW. (1968). Tropical spiny lobsters Panulirus it recorded by Hicks et al. (1984). spp., of Western Australia (and the Indo-West Pacific). Journal ofthe Royal Society ofWestern Australia Although no intensive effort was made durip.g the 51: 33-38. present study to collect land crabs, a specimen of a George, RW. (1978). The land and freshwater crabs of previously unrecorded terrestrial gecarcinid Christmas Island. Australian National Parks and species, Epigrapsus politus, was collected from West Wildlife Service Unpublished report, 22 pp. White Beach, together with an additional specimen, Gibson-Hill, CA. (1947a). Christmas Island. The nature presented to the museum party, from Flying Fish of the coast. Bulletin ofthe Raffles Museum 18: 8-17. Cove. This species is a relatively small gecarcinid, Gibson-Hill, CA. (1947b). Christmas Island. Field notes somewhat resembling a juvenile Cardisoma hirtipes, on the terrestrial crabs. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum and was found amongst rocks of the supralittoral 18: 43-52. zone. Gordon, I. (1935). On two new species of Crustacea from Several decapod groups, notably the caridean Christmas Island. Annals and Magazine of Natural shrimps, are still poorly documented for History (10)16: 629-637. Christmas Island and require further specialist Hicks, J., Rumpff, H. and Yorkston, H. (1984). Christmas attention. The non-decapod crustacean fauna is Crabs. Christmas Island Natural History Association. almost unknown. Morgan, G.J. (1992). The hermit crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Coenobitidae, Diogenidae, Paguridae) of Christmas and Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Indian Ocean, REFERENCES with description of a new species of Paguristes. Raffles Andrews, CW. (1900). Land crustacea. In: A Monograph Bulletin ofZoology 40: 163-174. of Christmas Island (Indian Ocean). British Museum Pocock, RI. (1887). V. Crustacea. In: Giinther A. Report (Natural History), London. pa,ges 163-165. on a zoological collection by officers of HMS Flying Balss, von H. (1934). Die Krabben der Reise J.W. Harms' Fish at Christmas Island, Indian Ocean. Proceedings of nach der Christmas-Insel und dem Malaiischen the Zoological Society of London 1887: 520. Archipel. Zoologische Abhandlungen 106: 225-237. Tweedie, M.W.F. (1947). On the Brachyura of Christmas Calman, W.T. (1909). On decapod Crustacea from Island. Bulletin ofthe Raffles Museum 18: 27-42. Christmas Island, collected by Dr C W. Andrews, Ward, M. (1934). Notes on a collection of crabs from F.RS., F.Z.S. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean. Bulletin of the Raffles London 1909: 703-713. Museum 9: 5-28. Table 10 List of Decapod Crustacea Key to symbols * Not collected during this survey + New record for Christmas Island Numbers = sampling stations (see Table 4.) Station numbers PENAEOIDEA PENAEIDAE * Penaeus sp. STENOPODIDEA STENOPODIDAE Stenopus hispidus (Olivier, 1811) 1 CARIDEA PALAEMONIDAE PONTONIINAE * Coralliocaris graminea (Dana, 1852) * Coralliocaris superba (Dana, 1852) PALAEMONINAE Macrobrachium lar (Fabricius, 1798) Waterfall stream, Hewans Spring, * Palaemon carcinus Fabricius, 1798 Dales ALPHEIDAE * Alpheus aff. collumianus Stimpson, 1861 * Alpheus malleodigitus (Bate, 1888) Decapod Crustacea 119 Table 10 (cont.) Station numbers * Athanas djiboutensis Coutiere, 1897 * Athanas dorsalis (Stimpson, 1861) * Synalpheus biunguiculatus (Stimpson, 1861) GNATHOPHYLLIDAE + Hymenocera picta Dana, 1852 1 HlPPOLYTIDAE * Lysmata seticaudata (Risso, 1816) THALASSOCARlDIDAE * Thalassocaris lucida (Dana, 1852) PALINURA PALINURlDAE * Panulirus longipes (A. Milne Edwards, 1868) Panulints penicillatus (Olivier, 1791) 3 Panulirus versicolor (Latreille, 1804) 1,9 SCYLLARIDAE + Parribacus antarcticus (Lund, 1793) 1,2 * Thenus orientalis (Lund, 1793) ANOMURA DlOGENIDAE + Aniculus retipes Lewinsohn, 1982 3,11 + Aniculus ursus (Olivier, 1811) 1,3 Calcinus elegans (H. Milne Edwards, 1836) 1,2,3,4,5 + Calcinus gaimardii (H. Milne Edwards, 1848) 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,14,15 + Calcinus guamensis Wooster, 1984 1,3,5,6,8,11,14,15 Calcinus laevimanus (Randall, 1839) 3,4 + Calcinus latens (Randall, 1839) 1,2,10,15 + Calcinus minutus Buitendijk, 1937 1,2,3,5,8,9,11,14,15 + Calcinus seurati Forest, 1951 4 + Calcinus lineapropodus Morgan & Forest, 1991 1,2 * Clibanarius corallinus (H. Milne Edwards, 1848) * Clibanarius sp. 1 * Clibanarius
Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

    A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans

    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt

    National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt

    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
  • Three New Species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific Islands, with Comments on the Rarity of Bopyrids Parasitizing Brachyurans

    Three New Species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific Islands, with Comments on the Rarity of Bopyrids Parasitizing Brachyurans

    Zootaxa 4851 (1): 151–162 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4851.1.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B3E81FE-D1DC-4087-B36D-80158A178638 Three new species of Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 (Isopoda: Bopyridae) from Pacific islands, with comments on the rarity of bopyrids parasitizing brachyurans JIANMEI AN1*, WANRUI ZHENG1§, JIELONG LIANG1§ & GUSTAV PAULAY2 1 School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, 041000, P. R. China [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-7327 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6040-5603 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4029-0412 2 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7800, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-9797 *Corresponding author. § These two authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract Three new species of the bopyrid genus Scyracepon Tattersall, 1905 are described from crabs collected on Pacific Islands: Scyracepon polynesiensis n. sp. from the Society Islands, S. pseudoliomerae n. sp. from the Mariana Islands, and S. biglobosus n. sp. from the Line Islands. The first two were found infesting Xanthias lamarckii and Pseudoliomera sp. (Xanthidae), a new host family for species of Scyracepon, and the last was found parasitizing Schizophrys aspera (Majidae). Scyracepon now includes 11 species, all but one known from single collections, infesting 12 host species in 9 brachyuran families. The discovery of three new species, each rare, suggests that crab parasites are undersampled, and further suggests that the low relative diversity of bopyrids known from brachyurans may partly reflect this undersampling.
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World

    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
  • Crustacean Diversity of Ildırı Bay (Izmir, Turkey)

    Crustacean Diversity of Ildırı Bay (Izmir, Turkey)

    DOI: 10.22120/jwb.2020.131461.1164 Special issue 41-49 (2020) Challenges for Biodiversity and Conservation in the Mediterranean Region (http://www.wildlife-biodiversity.com/) Research Article Crustacean diversity of Ildırı Bay (Izmir, Turkey) Introduction Murat Ozaydinli1*, Kemal Can Bizsel2 1Ordu University, Fatsa Faculty of Marine Crustaceans are a critical element of the marine Science, Department of Fisheries Technology benthic ecosystem in terms of macrofauna Engineering, 52400, Ordu, Turkey, diversity and impact assessment. Many studies 2 Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Marine have been conducted on crustacean species in Sciences and Technology, 35340, Izmir, Turkey the Aegean Sea (Geldiay and Kocataş 1970, Geldiay and Kocataş 1973, Katağan 1982, *Email: [email protected] Ergen et al. 1988, Kırkım 1998, Katağan et al. Received: 22 July 2020 / Revised: 16 September 2020 / Accepted: 2001, Koçak et al. 2001, Ateş 2003, Sezgin 22 September 2020 / Published online: 21 October 2020. Ministry 2003, Yokeş et al. 2007, Anastasiadou et al. of Sciences, Research, and Technology, Arak University, Iran. 2020). These studies and more have been Abstract compiled by Bakır et al. (2014), who has given In this study, the crustacean diversity in Ildırı a checklist. A total of 1028 Crustacean species Bay, which is characterized by a high density of was reported along the Aegean Sea coast of aquaculture activity and tourism, was Turkey Bakır et al. (2014). investigated. Sampling was carried out by box- The Ildırı Bay is characterized by a high corer during four seasonal cruises (April, July, intensity of aquaculture and tourism activities November 2010, and February 2011) at eight (Demirel 2010, Bengil and Bizsel 2014).
  • Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007

    Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007

    Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007 Report to the Department of Finance and Deregulation, from the Director of National Parks September 2008 2 Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program Project Contributions Project coordination: D.J. James; Field survey: D.J. James, K. Retallick; Data management, GIS: D.J. James, K. Retallick; Analyses and reporting: D.J. James Citation This document can be cited as: Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007. Report to the Department of Finance and Deregulation from the Director of National Parks © Director of National Parks 2008 Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................9 1.1 Checklist of flora and fauna of Christmas Island.....................................................................9 1.2 Christmas Island biodiversity inventory database.................................................................10 2. CHRISTMAS ISLAND PIPISTRELLE ........................................................................................11 2.1 Summary of the results .........................................................................................................11 2.2 Research and monitoring methods .......................................................................................12
  • A Preliminary List of Shallow Water Decapod Crustacea in the Kerama Group, the Ryukyu Archipelago

    A Preliminary List of Shallow Water Decapod Crustacea in the Kerama Group, the Ryukyu Archipelago

    Bull Biogeogr. Soc. Japan 日本生物地理学会会報 51(2): 7-21. Dec. 20,1996 第 5 1巻第 2号1 996 年1 2 月 20 日 A preliminary list of shallow water decapod Crustacea in the Kerama Group, the Ryukyu Archipelago Keiichi Nomura, Seiji Nagai, Akira Asakura and Tomoyuki Komai Abstract. During a faunal survey of the Kerama いroup in 1978 and 1992-1994,S. Nagai and K. Nomura made intensive collections of decapod crustaceans. The material includes 299 species representing 37 families,excluding the Chirostylidae and Galatheidae. Of these, 47 species remain to be unidentified, because they include possibly undescribed or taxonomically proolematical species. First Japanese records are reported for the following 21 species, most of wmch are considered to be widely distributed in tropical and subtropical waters of the West Pacific or Indo-West Pacific: Odontozona ensifera, Discias exul, Leptochela irrobusta, Hamodactylus boshmai’ Periclimenaeus djiboutensis, P. hecate, Periclimenes amboinensis, P. cristimanus, P. novaecaledoniae, P. longirostris, Alpheus ehlersii, A. pareuchirus, A, tenuipes, Parabetaeus culliereti, Axiopsis serratifrons, Pylopaguropsis fimbriata, Petrolisthes extremus, Hyastenus uncifer, Tiarinia dana, Portunus mariei and Hypocolpus rugosus. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Fauna, Kerama, Ryukyu Introduction seven species of porcellanid crab in intertidal zone of The Kerama Group, which belongs to the Okinawa Zamami-jima. Recently, Okuno (1994) recorded Islands, the Ryukyu Archipelago, is located 30 km three species of rhynchocinetid shrimps, including a west of Okinawa-jima,and consists of about 20 new species, Rhynchocinetes concolor, from Aka- islands of various sizes. Despite the considerable jima. development of coral reef and related environment, its During a faunal survey of the Kerama Group in marine fauna has been little studied in the past.
  • Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)

    Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)

    Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 ..................................
  • (Callinectes Sapidus) and Stone Crab E-ISSN 2358-2936 (Menippe Mercenaria) Jen L

    (Callinectes Sapidus) and Stone Crab E-ISSN 2358-2936 (Menippe Mercenaria) Jen L

    Nauplius ORIGINAL ARTICLE THE JOURNAL OF THE Grooming behaviors and gill fouling in BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIETY the commercially important blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) and stone crab e-ISSN 2358-2936 www.scielo.br/nau (Menippe mercenaria) www.crustacea.org.br Jen L. Wortham1 orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-5410 Stephanie Pascual1 1 College of Natural and Health Sciences, University of Tampa, 401 West Kennedy Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA ZOOBANK http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB965881-F248-4121- 8DCA-26F874E0F12A ABSTRACT Grooming behaviors reduce fouling of body regions. In decapods, grooming time budgets, body regions groomed, and grooming appendages are known in several species; however, little data exists on brachyuran crabs. In this study, grooming behaviors of two commercially important crabs were documented (blue crabs: Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896; stone crabs: Menippe mercenaria Say, 1818). These crabs are harvested by fishermen and knowing their grooming behaviors is valuable, as clean crabs are preferred by consumers and the stone crab fishery consequence of removing one cheliped to grooming behaviors is unknown. Crabs were observed individually and agonistically to determine how grooming behaviors vary in the presence of another conspecific. Both species frequently use their maxillipeds and groom, with the gills being cleaned by epipods. Respiratory and sensory structures were groomed frequently in both species. Removal of a grooming appendage resulted in higher fouling levels in the gills, indicating that grooming behaviors do remove fouling. Overall, stone crabs had a larger individual time budget for grooming, but agonistic grooming time budgets were similar. Stone crab chelipeds are used in grooming, especially cleaning the other cheliped.
  • Concerning Traditional Ecological Knowledge

    Concerning Traditional Ecological Knowledge

    COLLECTIVE LEGAL AUTONOMY CONCERNING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE: THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THEIR LINKAGES TO BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN COLOMBIA AND AUSTRALIA NATALIA RODRÍGUEZ-URIBE LLB Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá–Colombia) MIntEnvLaw, LLM Macquarie University (Sydney–Australia) MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL Macquarie University, Sydney–Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law Submitted: August 2013 Approved: March 2014 1 COLLECTIVE LEGAL AUTONOMY CONCERNING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE NATALIA RODRÍGUEZ URIBE 2 COLLECTIVE LEGAL AUTONOMY CONCERNING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE NATALIA RODRÍGUEZ URIBE TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i Abstract ................................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. vi List of Acronyms, Abbreviations and Short Titles .............................................................ix Table of Cases .....................................................................................................................xi Human Rights Treaties Ratified by Australia ................................................................. xiii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................
  • Crustacea: Brachyura: Xanthidae) from Northern Australia

    Crustacea: Brachyura: Xanthidae) from Northern Australia

    Memoirs of Museum Victoria 73: 1–11 (2015) Published 2015 ISSN 1447-2546 (Print) 1447-2554 (On-line) http://museumvictoria.com.au/about/books-and-journals/journals/memoirs-of-museum-victoria/ Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve survey reveals new records of xanthid crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Xanthidae) from northern Australia TAMMY IWASA-ARAI1,2, ANNA W. MCCALLUM3,* AND JOANNE TAYLOR3 1 The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia 2 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departmento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Campus Trindade, CEP 88040-970, Florianopolis, SC – Brazil. Email: [email protected] 3 Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] jtaylor@ museum.vic.gov.au, * To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Iwasa-Arai, T., McCallum, A.W. and Taylor, J. 2015. Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve survey reveals new records of xanthid crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Xanthidae) from northern Australia. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 73: 1–11. Sampling in 2012 (SOL5650 and SS2012t07) by the RV Solander and RV Southern Surveyor resulted in a small collection of decapod crustaceans, including brachyuran crabs. The surveys were undertaken on the shelf off northern Australia, including within the Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve as part of the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program Marine Biodiversity Hub. Here we report on nine species of Xanthidae collected during these surveys, including specimens from the subfamilies Actaeinae, Euxanthinae, Liomerinae and Zosiminae. Two species are reported for the first time in Australian waters Acteodes( mutatus (Ortmann, 1894) and Atergatopsis granulata A.
  • National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

    NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Romania, June 2012 Please submit the completed National Report, in electronic (Microsoft Word) format, and preferably by e-mail, to the Ramsar Secretariat by 15 September 2011. National Reports should be sent to: Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) National Report Format for Ramsar COP11, page 2 Introduction & background 1. This National Report Format (NRF) has been approved by the Standing Committee in Decision SC41-24 for the Ramsar Convention’s Contracting Parties to complete as their national reporting to the 11th meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties of the Convention (Bucharest, Romania, June 2012). 2. Following Standing Committee discussions at its 40th meeting in May 2009, and its Decision SC40-29, this COP11 National Report Format closely follows that used for the COP10 National Report Format, which in turn was a significantly revised and simplified format in comparison with the National Report Formats provided to previous recent COPs. 3. In addition to thus permitting continuity of reporting and implementation progress analyses by ensuring that indicator questions are as far as possible consistent with previous NRFs (and especially the COP10 NRF), this COP11 NRF is structured in terms of the Goals and Strategies of the 2009-2015 Ramsar Strategic Plan adopted at COP10 as Resolution X.1, and the indicators