DOCSLIB.ORG

(1976) Directed by Brian De Palma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(1976) Directed by Brian De Palma Original Bad Girl By Christina Harlin, your Fearless Young Orphan Carrie (1976) Directed by Brian De Palma I have been defending this Brian De Palma film as the version of Carrie that one must see in order to really appreciate a film interpretation of a pretty entertaining little book. I have compared it in my discussions of the 2013 remake, the 2002 TV miniseries, and the strange 1999 sequel. I touted it rather heartily, and was sad when I heard people didn’t like it, like my feelings were hurt about it. Well, this was a favorite of mine when I was younger and thought that burning a room full of bullies sounded like an awesome idea. Obviously it’s been at least ten years, probably more, since I watched De Palma’s film. It’s not as good as I remember. Crap. Oh, it still has its moments – many of them – but it’s not the well-crafted endeavor that my brain had re-imagined. I’ve gotten a lot smarter about movies since last I watched this. Amazing what you’ll discover, when you put yourself through the paces of classics or force yourself to analyze films to the best of your knowledge, and then your knowledge begins to expand. I’m still an amateur at movie talk, I know that, but apparently I’ve either learned enough or aged enough that all the rough edges of Carrie (1976) are showing larger than life. It doesn’t help that my brain likes to fill in gaps for me. Damn brain! I’ve read the book so many times that I’ve filled in all the gaps that the movies leave, so I had quite forgotten that De Palma’s version is so short, and moves so quickly, that one can barely catch breath before it’s Prom Night. Sissy Spacek and Piper Laurie star, of course. Spacek’s performance is elegant, aided mightily by her petite childlike looks. Never has a Carrie looked more vulnerable than this little wisp of a girl. Piper Laurie is having uproarious fun playing Margaret White, but after the fascinating spin Julianne Moore put on her performance of the character, Piper isn’t quite as scary to see. Oh, she’s still fun to watch, don’t misunderstand me. But these two women, daughter Carrie and mother Margaret, who are facing off on the grounds of God vs. the World, mother vs. daughter, innocence vs. experience, are not given enough time in De Palma’s film for us to understand what is really at stake between them. This Margaret has no valleys, she’s all peaks, and without any valleys, she is less a character and more a force of nature. I realized that, for years now, I have been supplementing her performance with what I knew from the book. Well, is that fair? I know from experience that having “done the reading” is often an important part of enjoying a film, but then again, a film should be able to stand on its own too. Carrie of 1976 does not do that as well as I had thought. Okay, so we rush headlong into the story. Carrie is tormented by the girls in her gym class, led by mean girl Chris Hargensen (the vicious, voluptuous hottie played by Nancy Allen with the terrifying nastiness of Grade A bitch) when Carrie has a shocking first period in the gym showers. It makes more sense in 1976 than it does now, though her principal still asks “in this day and age?” about Carrie’s ignorance. But okay, the information superhighway wasn’t running through Carrie’s home town. There are other appreciable differences in this earliest version: the actors who play the supporting characters are by far the best in their respective roles. Amy Irving is perfect as Sue Snell, even in her abbreviated time: a girl who wants to do the right thing at least to ease her own conscience but also, oh my, relishing that secret pleasure in being able to convince her hunky boyfriend to do something crazy for her. William Katz is surprisingly sweet and believable the golden boy jock who Isn’t this a nicely arranged moment? Shots like this make is also kind and decent and wow – some other mistakes forgivable. what an amazing mop of hair on his head. Our villains Chris and Billy (Allen and Travolta) are the perfect combination of sadistic bitch and stupid violent sociopath. Bam, we see Carrie abused at home by her religious maniac mother, bam, we see Sue Snell try to redeem herself by offering up her yummy boyfriend as Carrie’s prom date, bam, there is friction from the doubters, and then BAM it’s prom night. Relative to the length of the film (it’s about 90 minutes long) Prom is a major portion of this movie, so we get a definite feel that this was where De Palma’s passion was leaning. That passion shows in this exquisite scene of horror. De Palma has always had a knack for filming a complicated scene with impressive grace and unforgettable touches, and it is during the prom that this version of Carrie really starts rocking and rolling. It’s beautifully staged, with Chris and Billy Nolan (teen heartthrob era John Travolta) hiding under the stage, backlit in ominous silhouettes, that rope leading from Chris’s fingers to the bucket of pig’s blood dangling above the stage, the dread-filled moments before the catastrophe happens. Sue Snell is almost in time to avert disaster – we’ve been screaming at her for ten minutes to notice that rope, stupid bitch! And meanwhile Carrie and Tommy smile through their coronation. The blood falls and all hell breaks loose. The scene of destruction is succinct and ruthless. This Carrie is not messing around, and she is given no excuses, no fugue states, blackouts, incomprehension at her actions, nor any opportunity to redeem herself with apologies. She lays waste to everyone and then heads home to throw herself – and her mother in a harrowing murder scene – onto the altar. Carrie may be succumbing to the affliction that strikes so many horror movies over time: it was made to appeal to the audience of the time, and now it’s looking quite dated. Techniques used in the movie, which might have felt clever way back when, look clumsy, badly out of place. Consider the scene in which Tommy and his friends try on tuxedos for the prom. Why is this scene included? Why is it played for comedy? What about the overloud, sometimes irritating soundtrack, that seems to punctuate moments that really don’t need its help? Laurie and Spacek take a little time to warm into their parts – they make up for it later, but the false start is noticeable. If too many of these awkward things pile up over the course of a movie, then I have to admit that no, it’s really not the classic I remembered it being. This does not mean it doesn’t have some extraordinary moments. What it does mean is that this 1976 Carrie, like its 2002 and 2013 counterparts, trips up in enough places that it still doesn’t feel like a definitive version of the tale. It remains, however, the most frightening version of the three, the one with the most striking imagery, the best prom scene, and the version that makes us feel the most pity for Carrie White, who probably doesn’t even deserve it. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BRICE DELLSPERGER Solitaires
    **click here to access to the french version** BRICE DELLSPERGER Solitaires Exhibition from June 20 to July 30, 2020 43, rue de la Commune de Paris F-93230 Romainville For his new solo sow at Air de Paris, Brice Dellsperger presents two new films «Body Double 36» and «Body Double 37». «My Body Double videos are like doubles of movie sequences from the 70s or 80s: the title refers to Brian de Palma’s film (Body Double, 1984). To this day the series includes forty films with various running times, where the obsessive motif is the body of the double in mainstream movies. Following a rigorous but emancipating process, each selected scene is re-enacted by a single transvestite actor or actress, a super character who interprets all the parts by becoming double.» By appropriating the linear/ authoritarian form of a movie, the Body Double films aim at disrupting normative sexual genres through the means of a camp aesthetic.» Body Double 36 (2019) After Perfect (James Bridges, 1985) with Jean Biche. Aerobics were the fashion in the 80s! James Bridges’ Perfect was released in 1985. The film superficially describes human relationships in a gym club in Los Angeles, seen through the eyes of a journalist (John Travolta) who is beguiled by an androgynous gym coach (Jamie Lee Curtis). Studies on the postmodern body in contemporary American society are linked to the context of the 80s, a period which recognized an ideal body-object caught up by the AIDS epidemic. The identification of the HIV virus had a major influence on the perception and representation of bodies and sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Brice Dellsperger Body Double
    Brice Dellsperger Body Double Curated by Selva Barni - Fantom Oct 24th — Nov 30th, 2018 Marsèlleria Via Paullo, 12/A Milan GROUND FLOOR 1. Body Double 10 Reprise of Brian de Palma's Obsession, 1997 1’ 27’’, loop With Dominique, Jean-luc Verna, Joy Falquet 2. Love/pursuit Body Double 3 Reprise of Brian de Palma's Body Double, 1995 1 1’50’’, loop With Brice Dellsperger Body Double 28 Reprise of Thomas Carter's Miami Vice Pilot (Brother's Keeper), 2013 2’46’’, loop With Brice Dellsperger 5 4 2 3. Despair 3 Body Double 21 Reprise of Roger Avary's The Rules of Attractions featuring V/VM's GROUND FLOOR sound design, 2005 19’56’’, loop With Lili Laxenaire, Joy Falquet, Sophie Lesné, Jean-Luc Verna, Carey Jeffries, William Carnimolla, Morgane Rousseau, Eva Carlton, Mercedes, Gwen Roch', Denis d'Arcangelo 4. Chases Body Double 4 Reprise of Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho as Donna Summer in Bad Girls, 1996 6’4’’, loop With Brice Dellsperger Body Double 5 Reprise of Brian de Palma's Dressed To Kill in Disneyland, 1996 5’40’’, loop With Brice Dellsperger Body Double 15 Reprise of Brian de Palma's Dressed to Kill, 2001 8’37’’, loop With Brice Dellsperger 5. Dead Star Body Double 26 Adaptation of Kenneth Anger's Hollywood Babylon I/II with Dead Can Dance's The Host Of Seraphim as a soundtrack, 2011 6’8’’, loop With Constance Legeay, Charleyne Boyer, Anita Gauran marselleria.org/body_double BASEMENT 6. Body Double 32 Reprise of Brian De Palma's Carrie, 2017 10’11’’ ca., loop 6 Music Didier Blasco With Alex Wetter BASEMENT FIRST FLOOR 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Audition Sheet Bring This Sheet with You to the Audition
    THE STORY Based on the Stephen King’s first novel, Carrie is the story of a high school girl with telekinetic powers. Bullied by classmates and abused by her overbearing mother, Carrie finds herself on a path toward independence and acceptance by her peers- until everything comes to a brutal end on prom night. THE CAST • Carrie White • Margaret White- Carrie’s mother • Sue Snell- the first to befriend Carrie; the story is told from her memories • Tommy Ross- Sue’s boyfriend who takes Carrie to the prom • Chris Hargenson- Carrie’s biggest foe, determined to bring her down from her ascent • Billy Nolan- Chris’ boyfriend and cruel partner in crime • Reverend Bliss- church leader • Mr. Stephens- English teacher/guidance counselor • Ms. Gardner- PE teacher • Named Students- George, Freddy, Frieda, Stokes, Helen, Norma • Chorus- students and other smaller roles The cast will feature ~25 performers (principals and chorus). THE PRODUCTION Attendance at all rehearsals is mandatory for principals and for support cast as needed. A calendar will be distributed on a bi-weekly basis- I assume you can be at all rehearsals, Monday through Thursday (3:05-5:30) and Friday (2:30- 5:30) unless otherwise noted on this form. A missed rehearsal may require dismissal from the show. Masconomet's Drug and Alcohol Policy applies to all cast and crew members of school productions. There will be 3 performances of Carrie: October 27, 28, and 29 at 7:00pm. AUDITIONS Auditions for all male roles will take place on Monday, August 29, from 3:00-4:30pm. Auditions for all female roles will take place on Monday, August 29, from 6:00-8:30pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Production Designer Jack Fisk to Be the Focus of a Fifteen-Film ‘See It Big!’ Retrospective
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRODUCTION DESIGNER JACK FISK TO BE THE FOCUS OF A FIFTEEN-FILM ‘SEE IT BIG!’ RETROSPECTIVE Series will include Fisk’s collaborations with Terrence Malick, Brian De Palma, Paul Thomas Anderson, and more March 11–April 1, 2016 at Museum of the Moving Image Astoria, Queens, New York, March 1, 2016—Since the early 1970s, Jack Fisk has been a secret weapon for some of America’s most celebrated auteurs, having served as production designer (and earlier, as art director) on all of Terrence Malick’s films, and with memorable collaborations with David Lynch, Paul Thomas Anderson, and Brian De Palma. Nominated for a second Academy Award for The Revenant, and with the release of Malick’s new film Knight of Cups, Museum of the Moving Image will celebrate the artistry of Jack Fisk, master of the immersive 360-degree set, with a fifteen-film retrospective. The screening series See It Big! Jack Fisk runs March 11 through April 1, 2016, and includes all of Fisk’s films with the directors mentioned above: all of Malick’s features, Lynch’s Mulholland Drive and The Straight Story, De Palma’s Carrie and Phantom of the Paradise, and Anderson’s There Will Be Blood. The Museum will also show early B- movie fantasias Messiah of Evil and Darktown Strutters, Stanley Donen’s arch- affectionate retro musical Movie Movie, and Fisk’s directorial debut, Raggedy Man (starring Sissy Spacek, Fisk’s partner since they met on the set of Badlands in 1973). Most titles will be shown in 35mm. See below for schedule and descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Steven Spielberg
    Understanding Steven Spielberg Understanding Steven Spielberg By Beatriz Peña-Acuña Understanding Steven Spielberg Series: New Horizon By Beatriz Peña-Acuña This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Beatriz Peña-Acuña Cover image: Nerea Hernandez Martinez All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-0818-8 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-0818-7 This text is dedicated to Steven Spielberg, who has given me so much enjoyment and made me experience so many emotions, and because he makes me believe in human beings. I also dedicate this book to my ancestors from my mother’s side, who for centuries were able to move from Spain to Mexico and loved both countries in their hearts. This lesson remains for future generations. My father, of Spanish Sephardic origin, helped me so much, encouraging me in every intellectual pursuit. I hope that contemporary researchers share their knowledge and open their minds and hearts, valuing what other researchers do whatever their language or nation, as some academics have done for me. Love and wisdom have no language, nationality, or gender. CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One ................................................................................................. 3 Spielberg’s Personal Context and Executive Production Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 19 Spielberg’s Behaviour in the Process of Film Production 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • (XXXIII: 11) Brian De Palma: the UNTOUCHABLES (1987), 119 Min
    November 8, 2016 (XXXIII: 11) Brian De Palma: THE UNTOUCHABLES (1987), 119 min. (The online version of this handout has color images and hot url links.) DIRECTED BY Brian De Palma WRITING CREDITS David Mamet (written by), Oscar Fraley & Eliot Ness (suggested by book) PRODUCED BY Art Linson MUSIC Ennio Morricone CINEMATOGRAPHY Stephen H. Burum FILM EDITING Gerald B. Greenberg and Bill Pankow Kevin Costner…Eliot Ness Sean Connery…Jimmy Malone Charles Martin Smith…Oscar Wallace Andy García…George Stone/Giuseppe Petri Robert De Niro…Al Capone Patricia Clarkson…Catherine Ness Billy Drago…Frank Nitti Richard Bradford…Chief Mike Dorsett earning Oscar nominations for the two lead females, Piper Jack Kehoe…Walter Payne Laurie and Sissy Spacek. His next major success was the Brad Sullivan…George controversial, ultra-violent film Scarface (1983). Written Clifton James…District Attorney by Oliver Stone and starring Al Pacino, the film concerned Cuban immigrant Tony Montana's rise to power in the BRIAN DE PALMA (b. September 11, 1940 in Newark, United States through the drug trade. The film, while New Jersey) initially planned to follow in his father’s being a critical failure, was a major success commercially. footsteps and study medicine. While working on his Tonight’s film is arguably the apex of De Palma’s career, studies he also made several short films. At first, his films both a critical and commercial success, and earning Sean comprised of such black-and-white films as Bridge That Connery an Oscar win for Best Supporting Actor (the only Gap (1965). He then discovered a young actor whose one of his long career), as well as nominations to fame would influence Hollywood forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Vengeance Is Ours: Safe Spaces and Critical Empathy in Horror Films David S
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 5-8-2018 Vengeance is Ours: Safe Spaces and Critical Empathy in Horror Films David S. Hooker Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hooker, David S.. (2018). Vengeance is Ours: Safe Spaces and Critical Empathy in Horror Films. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 282. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/282 Copyright © 2018 David S. Hooker This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Vengeance is Ours Safe Spaces and Critical Empathy in Horror Films David S. Hooker Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Departmental Honors in English Bridgewater State University May 8, 2018 Dr. John Mulrooney, Thesis Advisor Prof. Evan Dardano, Committee Member Prof. Nicole Williams, Committee Member Hooker 1 Abstract Many genres of film seek to bring viewers to heightened emotional states, perhaps this is most true of horror films. Although often displaying extreme violence, such films paradoxically provide openings for critically empathetic viewings which allow viewers with diverse backgrounds and experiences to identify with victims and survivors and transcend elements of subjective identity. This project analyzes the capacity of horror films, including those of William Friedkin, David Cronenberg, Brian DePalma and others, to offer viewers space in which to be critically empathetic. Regarding gender issues in the genre as outlined by such scholars as Carol J. Clover, and the emerging scholarship on critical empathy, such as that of Todd DeStigter, this project offers new ways of thinking about horror both on screen and off.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Theme in Stephen King's Novel Carrie
    A DESCRIPTION OF THEME IN STEPHEN KING’S NOVEL CARRIE A PAPER BY NAME : TAMARA REBECCA REG.NO : 142202013 DIPLOMA III ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM FACULTY OFCULTURAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUMATERA UTARA MEDAN 2017 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Approved by Supervisor, Drs. Parlindungan Purba, M.Hum. NIP. 19630216 198903 1 003 Submitted to Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of North Sumatera In partial fulfillment of the requirements for Diploma-III in English Study Program Approved by Head of Diploma III English Study Program, Dra.SwesanaMardiaLubis.M.Hum. NIP. 19571002 198601 2 003 Approved by the Diploma-III English Study Program Faculty of Culture Studies, University of Sumatera Utara as a Paper for the Diploma-III Examination UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Accepted by the board of examiners in partial fulfillment of the requirement for The Diploma-III Examination of the Diploma-III of English Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Studies, University of Sumatera Utara. The Examination is held on : Faculty of Culture Studies, University of Sumatera Utara Dean, Dr. Budi Agustono, M.S. NIP. 19600805198703 1 0001 Board of Examiners : Signed 1. Dra. SwesanaMardiaLubis, M.Hum( Head of ESP) ____________ 2. Drs. ParlindunganPurba, M.Hum( Supervisor ) ____________ 3. Drs. SiamirMarulafau, M.Hum ____________ UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I am Tamara Rebecca declare that I am thesole author of this paper. Except where the reference is made in the text of this paper, this paper contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a paper by which I have qualified for or awarded another degree. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Factfile: Gce As Level Moving Image Arts the Influence of Alfred Hitchcock’S Cinematic Style
    FACTFILE: GCE AS LEVEL MOVING IMAGE ARTS THE INFLUENCE OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S CINEMATIC STYLE The influence of Alfred Hitchcock’s Cinematic Style Learning outcomes Students should be able to: • explain the influence of Hitchcock’s cinematic style on the work of contemporary filmmakers; and • analyse the cinematic style of filmmakers who have been influenced by Hitchcock. Course Content Alfred Hitchcock’s innovative approach to visual In the 1970’s, as his career was coming to an storytelling and the central themes of his work have end, Hitchcock was a seminal influence on the had a profound influence on world cinema, shaping young directors of the New Hollywood, including film genres such as crime and horror and inspiring Steven Spielberg, Francis Ford Coppola, Martin generations of young directors to experiment with Scorsese and Brian De Palma. Over the past four film language. decades, this influence has expanded greatly with Hitchcock’s body of work functioning as a virtual In Paris in the 1960’s, French New Wave directors, film school for learning the rules of the Classical Francois Truffaut and Claude Chabrol embraced Hollywood Style, as well as how to break them. The Hitchcock’s dark vision of criminality, while in director’s influence is so far-reaching, that the term London, young Polish director Roman Polanski ‘Hitchcockian’ is now universally applied in the created a terrifying Hitchcockian nightmare in his analysis of contemporary cinema. The directors of debut film, Repulsion (1965). the New Hollywood drew inspiration from a wide range of Hitchcock’s techniques. 1 FACTFILE: GCE AS LEVEL MOVING IMAGE ARTS / THE INFLUENCE OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK’S CINEMATIC STYLE Martin Scorsese through an automated car factory in which the film’s hero is encased in a newly-built vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Films for Filmmakers
    101 (OR SO) FILMS FOR FILMMAKERS The purpose of this list is not to create an exhaustive list of every important film ever made or filmmaker who ever lived. That task would be impossible. The purpose is to create a succinct list of films and filmmakers that have had a major impact on filmmaking. A second purpose is to help contextualize films and filmmakers within the various film movements with which they are associated. The list is organized chronologically, with important film movements (e.g. Italian Neorealism, The French New Wave) inserted at the appropriate time. AFI (American Film Institute) Top 100 films are in blue (green if they were on the original 1998 list but were removed for the 10th anniversary list). Guidelines: 1. The majority of filmmakers will be represented by a single film (or two), often their first or first significant one. This does not mean that they made no other worthy films; rather the films listed tend to be monumental films that helped define a genre or period. For example, Arthur Penn made numerous notable films, but his 1967 Bonnie and Clyde ushered in the New Hollywood and changed filmmaking for the next two decades (or more). 2. Some filmmakers do have multiple films listed, but this tends to be reserved for filmmakers who are truly masters of the craft (e.g. Alfred Hitchcock, Stanley Kubrick) or filmmakers whose careers have had a long span (e.g. Luis Buñuel, 1928-1977). A few filmmakers who re-invented themselves later in their careers (e.g. David Cronenberg–his early body horror and later psychological dramas) will have multiple films listed, representing each period of their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review of Novel Carrie by Stephen King
    BOOK REVIEW OF NOVEL CARRIE BY STEPHEN KING A FINAL PROJECT In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement For S-1 Degree in American Cultural Studies in English Department Faculty of Humanities Diponegoro University Submitted by: BRIAN WICAKSONO 13020110141017 FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DIPONEGORO UNIVERSITY SEMARANG 2015 PRONOUNCEMENT The writer states thruthfully that this project is compiled by himself without taking any results from other researchers in S-1, S-2, S-3, and in diploma degree of any universities. In addition, the writer ascertains that he does not take the material from other project or someone’s work except for the references mentioned. Semarang, 26 January 2015 Brian Wicaksono MOTTO AND DEDICATION Dimana ada kemauan, di situ ada jalan. (My Grandma, Hj. Sri Sundari) Stop saying these negative things about yourself. Look in the mirror and find something about yourself that’s positive and celebrate that! (Tyra Banks) This paper is dedicated to: My beloved parents My Grandparents My only one brother My only one sister And my friends APPROVAL Approved by: The Advisor, Arido Laksono, S.S, M.Hum NIP. 197507111999031002 VALIDATION Accepted and approved by: Strata 1 Final Project Examination Committee Faculty of Humanities Diponegoro University On February 2015 Chair Person Second Member Dra. Wiwiek Sundari, M.Hum Prof. Dr. Nurdien H.K, M.A NIP. 195906071990032001 NIP. 195211031980121001 First Member Third Member Dra. Arida Widyastuti, M.Hum Dra. R.Aj. Atrinawati, M.Hum NIP. 196306071989032001 NIP. 196101011990012001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Praise be to the Almighty of the universe, who has given strength, blessing and true spirit, so this final project on “Book Review of Novel Carrie by Stephen King” comes to a completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Horror, Crime, and War: Some Comment on the Films of Brian De Palma, 1980-1989
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 31, núm. 1 (2021) · ISSN: 2014-668X Horror, Crime, and War: Some Comment on the Films of Brian De Palma, 1980-1989 ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract This review-essay revisits four films by Brian De Palma made between 1980 and 1989—Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables, and Casualties of War—in an attempt to reconsider the most successful decade of De Palma’s career and at the same time to counter the received wisdom that he is somehow a “great” or “visionary” director. In fact, De Palma has built his career largely on the imitation of old movies, usually by Alfred Hitchcock, beginning with his very first film, Murder à la Mod (1968), and extending all the way through to Passion (2012). Keywords: Brian De Palma, Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables, Casualties of War, American cinema. Resumen Este ensayo-retrospectiva revisita cuatro películas de Brian De Palma realizadas entre 1980 y 1989 —Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables y Casualties of War— en un intento de valorar la década más exitosa de la carrera de De Palma en la que se deposita toda la sabiduría recibida del de alguna manera, uno de los grandes directores y un "visionario". De hecho, De Palma ha construido su carrera en gran parte sobre la imitación de películas clásicas, generalmente de Alfred Hitchcock, comenzando con su primera película, Murder à la Mod (1968), y extendiéndose hasta Passion (2012). Palabras clave: Brian De Palma, Dressed to Kill, Scarface, The Untouchables, Casualties of War, Cine norteamericano. Introduction I’d like to begin this review-essay with what, by now, sadly, is the received wisdom on Brian De Palma, from none other than Robin Wood: The conventional dismissal of Brian De Palma—that he is a mere “Hitchcock imitator”—[is] certainly unjust .
    [Show full text]