DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Public Land Orders, 1951–1960

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Public Land Orders, 1951–1960 Table of Public Land Orders, 1951±1960 EDITORIAL NOTE: In the following table, PLO means Public Land Order and EO means Executive order. PLO No. Signature Date Subject Heading FR Citation 695 Jan. 16, 1951 California; withdrawing certain public lands within the Los Padres 16 FR 581 National Forest for use as a condor sanctuary. 696 Jan. 16, 1951 Alaska; excluding certain tracts of land from the Chugach and 16 FR 581 Tongass National Forests and restoring them for purchase as homesites or as trade and manufacturing sites. 697 Feb. 2, 1951 .. Alaska; withdrawing public lands for national defense purposes; see 16 FR 1184 PLO No. 538. Revoked by PLO No. 1646 (23 FR 3853). 698 Feb. 12, 1951 Colorado; revoking in part PLO Nos. 459 and 494 ............................ 16 FR 1638 699 Feb. 12, 1951 Wyoming; reserving certain public lands in connection with the 16 FR 1639 Sybille Deer Winter Pasture. 700 Feb. 16, 1951 Alaska; excluding certain tracts of land from the Chugach and 16 FR 1771 Tongass National Forests and restoring them for purchase as homesites. Corrected by PLO No. 749 (16 FR 8848). 701 Feb. 21, 1951 Louisiana; transferring jurisdiction over the oil and gas deposits in 16 FR 1901 certain lands owned by the United States. Amended by PLO No. 2178 (25 FR 7878). 702 Mar. 5, 1951 .. Oregon; reservation of lands for the use of Interior Department for 16 FR 2234 timber access-road purposes and for the protection and preserva- tion of scenic and recreational areas. Revoked by PLO No. 5800 (46 FR 1734). 703 Mar. 8, 1951 .. New Mexico; withdrawing public lands from prospecting, location, 16 FR 2440 entry and purchase under the mining laws and reserving them for the use of the Army Department for military purposes. Revoked by PLO No. 833 (17 FR 4822). 704 Mar. 8, 1951 .. Nebraska; transferring jurisdiction over the oil and gas deposits in 16 FR 2441 certain lands owned by the United States. 705 Mar. 8, 1951 .. See PLO Nos. 15 and 66 ................................................................... 16 FR 2441 706 Mar. 15, 1951 California; reserving public lands for use of Navy Department; Naval 16 FR 2578 Supply Depot. 707 Mar. 16, 1951 Arkansas; modifying the boundaries of the Ouachita National Forest 16 FR 2637 708 Mar. 27, 1951 Alaska; revoking in part EO No. 6050 of Feb. 27, 1933; reserving 16 FR 2893 lands for site of an Army radio receiving station. 709 Apr. 10, 1951 New Mexico; withdrawing public land for use of the State Depart- 16 FR 3348 ment in connection with the Rio Grande Canalization Project. 710 Apr. 10, 1951 Washington; revoking in part PLO No. 261 ........................................ 16 FR 3348 711 Apr. 10, 1951 Nebraska and South Dakota; revoking EO No. 6604 of Feb. 16, 16 FR 3348 1934; withdrawing public lands for soil classification. 712 Apr. 16, 1951 Nevada; withdrawing lands for use of Air Force; bombing and gun- 16 FR 3440 nery range. Corrected by PLO No. 762 (16 FR 11689). 713 Apr. 16, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for classification. Revoked by PLO 16 FR 3441 No. 2181 (25 FR 8054). 714 Apr. 20, 1951 Washington; reserving public land for use in connection with the 16 FR 3586 construction of the Chief Joseph Dam Project. 715 Apr. 20, 1951 Alaska; reserving public lands for the use of the Air Force Depart- 16 FR 3586 ment for military purposes. 716 May 1, 1951 ... Alaska; revoking EO No. 8223 of Aug. 21, 1939; which made cer- 16 FR 4138 tain town site lands available for the use of Alaska Road Com- mission for aviation field purposes. 717 May 1, 1951 ... Arizona and New Mexico; revoking in part certain EOs creating 16 FR 4137 Public Water Reserves. 718 May 4, 1951 ... Alaska; amending EO No. 3149 of Aug. 16, 1919; reserving land for 16 FR 4374 the use of Navy Department for naval purposes. 719 May 15, 1951 California; withdrawing public land for use of Navy Department for a 16 FR 4753 radio installation. 720 May 15, 1951 Alaska; revoking in part EO No. 4592 of Feb. 22, 1927 .................... 16 FR 4752 721 May 23, 1951 Washington; excluding certain lands from the Olympic National For- 16 FR 5059 est. 722 May 23, 1951 New Mexico; reserving lands for use of Navy Department; experi- 16 FR 5059 mental work. Revoked by PLO No. 2816 (27 FR 11258). PLO No. Signature Date Subject Heading FR Citation 723 May 24, 1951 Alaska; transferring a certain tract of public land from the Federal 16 FR 5131 Communications Commission to the Army Department for use in connection with the Alaska Communications System. 724 May 24, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing land for the use of Army Department; military 16 FR 5132 purposes. Revoked by PLO No. 3768 (30 FR 10191). 725 June 4, 1951 .. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, 16 FR 5444; Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, South Dakota, Washing- 6135 ton and Wyoming; reserving lands within national forests as ad- ministrative sites, recreation areas or for other public purposes.. 726 June 6, 1951 .. Idaho; withdrawing public lands for use of the Army Department as 16 FR 5622 a National Guard target range. Revoked by PLO No. 5695 (45 FR 7816). 727 June 6, 1951 .. Oregon; withdrawing public land for use of the Army Department for 16 FR 5622 flood control purposes. 728 June 14, 1951 See PLO No. 556 ................................................................................ 16 FR 5901 729 June 19, 1951 Kentucky; transferring jurisdiction over the oil and gas deposits in 16 FR 6132 certain lands owned by the United States. Revoked by PLO No. 3706 (30 FR 7754). 730 June 25, 1951 California; withdrawing public lands for town-site purposes. Re- 16 FR 6391 voked by PLO No. 1569 (22 FR 10958). 731 June 25, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for the use of the Air Force; mili- 16 FR 6391 tary purposes. Corrected by PLO No. 1311 (21 FR 5130). 732 July 13, 1951 Arizona; revoking EO No. 5522 of Dec. 31, 1930 .............................. 16 FR 6948 733 July 18, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for use of the Army Department for 16 FR 7287 military purposes. 734 July 20, 1951 Alaska; reserving lands within Tongass National Forest as public 16 FR 7329 service site. Revoked by PLO No. 2386 (26 FR 4400). 735 July 26, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for the protection and preservation 16 FR 7571 of scenic and recreational areas. 736 July 27, 1951 Montana; reserved public lands for use by Forest Service; as ad- 16 FR 7571 ministrative site. 737 July 28, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public land for classification. Revoked by PLO 16 FR 7618 No. 1214 (20 FR 7004). 738 July 28, 1951 Alaska; reserving lands for the use of Air Force; military purposes; 16 FR 7618 revoking in part EO No. 7309 withdrawing lands in aid of legisla- tion. 739 July 28, 1951 Arizona; withdrawing public lands for use of the Army in connection 16 FR 7618 with the activities of National Guard. Revoked by PLO No. 5879 (46 FR 28166). 740 Aug. 3, 1951 .. Nevada; transfer of lands from the Toiyabe National Forest to the 16 FR 7826; Humboldt National Forest. 8184 741 Aug. 9, 1951 .. Wisconsin; reserving certain public lands in connection with the 16 FR 8113 Totogatic Conservation Area. Revoked by PLO No. 1558 (22 FR 9433). 742 Aug. 9, 1951 .. Idaho; reserving certain public lands in connection with the Sand 16 FR 8184 Creek Elk Refuge. 743 Aug. 16, 1951 Alaska; transferring certain land reserved by EO No. 8305 of Dec. 16 FR 8366 19, 1939; for the use of the War Department; military purposes to the Agriculture Department for use for building purposes. 744 Aug. 16, 1951 Idaho; revoking EO No. 5482 of Nov. 14, 1930 ................................. 16 FR 8366 745 Aug. 16, 1951 Utah; withdrawing public lands and reserved minerals in patented 16 FR 8465 lands for use of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Revoked by PLO No. 1295 (21 FR 2945, 3076). 746 Aug. 17, 1951 Alaska; reserving certain land for the use of the Alaska Railroad ..... 16 FR 8465 747 Aug. 17, 1951 See PLO No. 680 ................................................................................ 16 FR 8465 748 Aug. 17, 1951 See PLO No. 690 ................................................................................ 16 FR 8465 749 Aug. 27, 1951 See PLO No. 700 ................................................................................ 16 FR 8848 750 Aug. 29, 1951 Florida; addition of certain lands to Ocala National Forest ................ 16 FR 9044 751 Aug. 29, 1951 Alaska; modifying Air-Navigation Site Withdrawal No. 156; reserving 16 FR 9044 certain public lands for townsite purposes; and revoking in part PLO No. 487. 752 Sept. 7, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for purposes of timber manage- 16 FR 9316 ment and disposal. Revoked by PLO No. 2181 (25 FR 8054). PLO No. Signature Date Subject Heading FR Citation 753 Sept. 14, 1951 Alaska; reserving land for use of Bureau of Land Management as 16 FR 9569 administrative site; revoking order of Secretary of Interior of Oct. 30, 1943; establishing Air-Navigation Site Withdrawal No. 210. 754 Sept. 14, 1951 Oregon; withdrawing public lands for timber preservation purposes 16 FR 9570 755 Sept. 21, 1951 Alaska; withdrawing public lands for use of the Alaska Railroad as a 16 FR 9816 source of gravel; revoking in part EO No. 4778 of Dec. 5, 1927 and the order of Oct. 30, 1936, of the Secretary of the Interior. 756 Oct. 10, 1951 Colorado; transferring jurisdiction over the minerals reserved to the 16 FR 10606 United States in certain lands to the Army Department. 757 Oct. 16, 1951 See PLO No. 601 ................................................................................ 16 FR 10749 758 Oct. 22, 1951 California; reserving certain public lands in connection with Mad- 16 FR eline Plains Waterfowl Management Area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of Fire History in the National Key Deer Refuge, Monroe County, Florida, U.S.A.: the Palmetto Pond Macroscopic Charcoal Record
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2012 Reconstruction of Fire History in the National Key Deer Refuge, Monroe County, Florida, U.S.A.: The Palmetto Pond Macroscopic Charcoal Record Desiree Lynn Kocis [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Kocis, Desiree Lynn, "Reconstruction of Fire History in the National Key Deer Refuge, Monroe County, Florida, U.S.A.: The Palmetto Pond Macroscopic Charcoal Record. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1175 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Desiree Lynn Kocis entitled "Reconstruction of Fire History in the National Key Deer Refuge, Monroe County, Florida, U.S.A.: The Palmetto Pond Macroscopic Charcoal Record." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. Sally P. Horn, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Liem Tran, Henri Grissino-Mayer Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Reconstruction of Fire History in the National Key Deer Refuge, Monroe County, Florida, U.S.A: The Palmetto Pond Macroscopic Charcoal Record A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Desiree Lynn Kocis May 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Desiree Kocis All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishlake National Forest
    FISHLAKE NATIONAL FOREST RESPONSE TO COMMENTS for the FISHLAKE OHV ROUTE DESIGNATION PROJECT 12 October 2006 INTRODUCTION The forest incorporated existing comments from prior public participation processes during the pre- NEPA (NFMA) assessment. The following documents from these efforts are incorporated by reference: Public comments received for the 2001 OHV Event Environmental Assessment for the Rocky Mountain and Fillmore Jamborees. The assessment covered all of the Fishlake and portions of the Dixie and Manti-LaSal National Forests as well as Richfield BLM. OHV and travel management comments received by mail or at public meetings for Forest Plan revision efforts. Meeting notes and final presentations and reports from the Forest Plan revision Topical Working Groups (TWiGs) for OHVs, dispersed camping, and undeveloped area suitability. These records are included in the OHV project file and are incorporated by reference. The Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Fishlake OHV Route Designation Project was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2004. The NOI included a proposed action (Alternative 2) that designated routes and areas open to motorized use on the Fishlake National Forest. The effect of these designations is to close the forest to unrestricted motorized cross-country travel. The NOI asked for comments on the proposed action by July 30, 2004. Immediately prior to release of the NOI, the Forest Service briefed local governmental officials, motorized advocacy groups, businesses, and environmental groups. The project web site http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/fishlake/projects/ohv.shtml, press release, and postings at some trailheads were used to disseminate information and gather comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Southern Florida's Native Plant Heritage
    A publication of The Institute for Regional Conservation’s Restoring South Florida’s Native Plant Heritage program Copyright 2002 The Institute for Regional Conservation ISBN Number 0-9704997-0-5 Published by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue Miami, Florida 33170 www.regionalconservation.org [email protected] Printed by River City Publishing a division of Titan Business Services 6277 Powers Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32217 Cover photos by George D. Gann: Top: mahogany mistletoe (Phoradendron rubrum), a tropical species that grows only on Key Largo, and one of South Florida’s rarest species. Mahogany poachers and habitat loss in the 1970s brought this species to near extinction in South Florida. Bottom: fuzzywuzzy airplant (Tillandsia pruinosa), a tropical epiphyte that grows in several conservation areas in and around the Big Cypress Swamp. This and other rare epiphytes are threatened by poaching, hydrological change, and exotic pest plant invasions. Funding for Rare Plants of South Florida was provided by The Elizabeth Ordway Dunn Foundation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Major funding for the Floristic Inventory of South Florida, the research program upon which this manual is based, was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Steve Arrowsmith Fund. Nemastylis floridana Small Celestial Lily South Florida Status: Critically imperiled. One occurrence in five conservation areas (Dupuis Reserve, J.W. Corbett Wildlife Management Area, Loxahatchee Slough Natural Area, Royal Palm Beach Pines Natural Area, & Pal-Mar). Taxonomy: Monocotyledon; Iridaceae. Habit: Perennial terrestrial herb. Distribution: Endemic to Florida. Wunderlin (1998) reports it as occasional in Florida from Flagler County south to Broward County.
    [Show full text]
  • MSRP Appendix A
    APPENDIX A: RECOVERY TEAM MEMBERS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Appendix A. Names appearing in bold print denote those who authored or prepared Appointed Recovery various components of the recovery plan. Team Members Ralph Adams Geoffrey Babb Florida Atlantic University The Nature Conservancy Biological Sciences 222 South Westmonte Drive, Suite 300 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Altimonte Springs, Florida 32714-4236 Ross Alliston Alice Bard Monroe County, Environmental Florida Department of Environmental Resource Director Protection 2798 Overseas Hwy Florida Park Service, District 3 Marathon , Florida 33050 1549 State Park Drive Clermont, Florida 34711 Ken Alvarez Florida Department of Enviromental Bob Barron Protection U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Florida Park Service, 1843 South Trail Regulatory Division Osprey, Florida 34229 P.O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 Loran Anderson Florida State University Oron L. “Sonny” Bass Department of Biological Science National Park Service Tallahassee, Florida 32306-2043 Everglades National Park 40001 State Road 9336 Tom Armentano Homestead, Florida 33034-6733 National Park Service Everglades National Park Steven Beissinger 40001 State Road 9336 Yale University - School of Homestead, Florida 33034-6733 Forestry & Environmental Studies Sage Hall, 205 Prospect Street David Arnold New Haven, Connecticut 06511 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rob Bennetts 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard P.O. Box 502 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 West Glacier, Montana 59936 Daniel F. Austin Michael Bentzien Florida Atlantic University U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Sciences Jacksonville Field Office 777 Glades Road 6620 Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Jacksonville, Florida 32216-0912 David Auth Nancy Bissett University of Florida The Natives Florida Museum of Natural History 2929 J.B.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE USDA FOREST SERVICE ● Intermountain Region 324 25th STREET OGDEN, UTAH 84401 ● Web: http://www.fs.fed.us/r4 Release No. R4-1201 Contact: Erin O’Connor 801-625-5347 Mitch Snow 202-912-7368 National Forests Added and Comment Period Formally Extended on Planning for Sage Grouse Conservation Measures In cooperation with the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management will issue a corrected Notice of Intent to address sage-grouse in 10 additional National Forest System Lands and Resource Management Plans and formally extended the comment period through March 23, 2012. The notice will appear in the February 10, 2012 Federal Register. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) are seeking public comment on issues that should be addressed in Environmental Impact Statements (EIS’s) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SEIS’s) that will evaluate and provide greater sage-grouse conservation measures in land use plans in 10 Western states. This notice continues public comment on the scoping process for the EISs/SEISs through March 23, 2012. The EIS’s/SEIS’s will be coordinated under two regions: The Rocky Mountain Region, previously designated as the Eastern Region, which includes land use plans in the states of Colorado, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota and portions of Utah and Montana; and the Great Basin Region, previously designated as the Western Region, which includes land use plans in northeastern California, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, and portions of Utah and Montana. Within the Rocky Mountain Region, the potentially affected National Forest System Land Management Plans include: Colorado’s Routt National Forest Wyoming’s Thunder Basin National Grassland, Medicine Bow National Forest and the Bridger-Tetons National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta NF Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture The Enchantment of Forest Service Intermountain Region Ranger Life in the Hills UINTA NATIONAL FOREST JULY 2016 Administrative Facilities of the Uinta National Forest, 1905-1965 Historic Context & Evaluations Forest Service Report No. UWC-16-1328 Cover: Lake Creek Ranger Station, 1949 Pleasant Grove Ranger Station, 1965 “I had a carpenter hired and boarded up the house around the foundation. It was from 6 in. to 2 feet off the ground and skunks and animals frequently got under the house, which detracted some of the enchantment of Ranger Life in the Hills.” Aaron Parley Christiansen, April 26, 1919 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment
    Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment Black Hills National Forest Completed by: Continuing Education in Ecosystem Management Group Module XII June 12 – June 23, 2006 Acknowledgements This assessment would not have been possible without the assistance and patience of numerous individuals. We hope we spelled your name correctly and we are extremely grateful for all your help and assistance. Shelly Deisch – Ecologist, SD Game, Fish and Parks Gerard Baker - Superintendent, Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Bill Hill – Forester, Custer State Park Joe McFarland - Custer County, County Commissioner Ken Davis - Pennington County, County Commissioner Jim Brickley - Mayor Hill City Gary Brundige - Wildlife Biologist, Custer State Park Craig Pugsley - Recreation, Custer State Park Greg Josten – SD State Forestry Coe Foss – SD State Forestry Mike Pflaun, Chief Ranger Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Dan Licht, Reg. WL Biologist, Custer State Park Al Johnson – Owner, Palmer Gulch KOA Dave Ressler - Custer Chamber of Commerce Jim Sellars - Keystone Chamber of Commerce Mike Verchio - Hill City Chamber of Commerce Bob Demerssenan - Rapid City Chamber of Commerce John Forney - SD Tourism Committee Aaron Everett - Black Hills Forest Resource Association Justin Cutler - Recreational Adventures Co. Mike Jacobs – Black Hills Aerial Adventures Mike Dennyson - Developer Brian Brademeyer - Defenders of the Black Hills Sam Clawson - Sierra Club Jeremy Nichols - Biodiversity Conservation Alliance Colin Paterson - The Norbeck Society Nancy Hilding - Audubon
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Conservation Projects Funded for 2018
    Rare Plant Conservation Projects funded for 2018-19 (taken from annually submitted APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE- WORK PLAN 2018-2019, submitted to United States Fish and Wildlife Service from Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Florida Forest Service) FLORIDA STATEWIDE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED PLANT CONSERVATION PROGRAM Brian Camposano, Coordinator Florida Forest Service 3125 Conner Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida (850) 681-5890 FLORIDA STATEWIDE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED PLANT CONSERVATION PROGRAM, ANNUAL WORK PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PROGRAM WORK PLANS PAGE Florida Plant Conservation Program Administration, Management, and Research (Florida Forest Service)………………………………………..………………………………..1 Lake Wales Ridge Scrub Plant Monitoring and Management Plan Development (Florida Forest Service)….…………………………………………………..……………….....1 Removal of Invasive, Exotic Plants Around Torreya taxifolia and Silene catesbaei (City of Chattahoochee, Florida/Florida Forest Service/private contractors)…………….….……..........1 Seminole Wayside and Addition Lands – Pine Rockland Restoration (Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation & Open Spaces, Natural Areas Management)………..………………...........2 Conservation Research of the Recovery of Florida Ziziphus (Ziziphus celata) (Archbold Biological Station)…………….……………..…………………………………........2 Habitat improvement in four central Florida Counties with introduction, monitoring and research efforts for three target rare plant species: Phase I - Sandhill, Scrub, and ephemeral wetland. (Bok Tower Gardens)……………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Cave National Monument Historic Resource Study
    PLACE OF PASSAGES: JEWEL CAVE NATIONAL MONUMENT HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY 2006 by Gail Evans-Hatch and Michael Evans-Hatch Evans-Hatch & Associates Published by Midwestern Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska _________________________________ i _________________________________ ii _________________________________ iii _________________________________ iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: First Residents 7 Introduction Paleo-Indian Archaic Protohistoric Europeans Rock Art Lakota Lakota Spiritual Connection to the Black Hills Chapter 2: Exploration and Gold Discovery 33 Introduction The First Europeans United States Exploration The Lure of Gold Gold Attracts Euro-Americans to Sioux Land Creation of the Great Sioux Reservation Pressure Mounts for Euro-American Entry Economic Depression Heightens Clamor for Gold Custer’s 1874 Expedition Gordon Party & Gold-Seekers Arrive in Black Hills Chapter 3: Euro-Americans Come To Stay: Indians Dispossessed 59 Introduction Prospector Felix Michaud Arrives in the Black Hills Birth of Custer and Other Mining Camps Negotiating a New Treaty with the Sioux Gold Rush Bust Social and Cultural Landscape of Custer City and County Geographic Patterns of Early Mining Settlements Roads into the Black Hills Chapter 4: Establishing Roots: Harvesting Resources 93 Introduction Milling Lumber for Homes, Mines, and Farms Farming Railroads Arrive in the Black Hills Fluctuating Cycles in Agriculture Ranching Rancher Felix Michaud Harvesting Timber Fires in the Forest Landscapes of Diversifying Uses _________________________________ v Chapter 5: Jewel Cave: Discovery and Development 117 Introduction Conservation Policies Reach the Black Hills Jewel Cave Discovered Jewel Cave Development The Legal Environment Developing Jewel Cave to Attract Visitors The Wind Cave Example Michauds’ Continued Struggle Chapter 6: Jewel Cave Under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the National Forest
    HISTORY OF THE FREMONT NATIONAL FOREST O Melva M. Bach. O Fremont National Forest Lakeview, Oregon 1981 CAPTAtN JOHN C. FRENONT FOREWORD Gifford Pinchot once said, "The Forest Service is the best organization in the government because of the people in it". In my opinion, the out-door-loving S persons who choose their life work in the Forest Service and other conservation agencies are among the greatest Perhaps this is because these devoted people are more interested in helping to wisely use and perpetuate our natural resources rather than to exploit them. The8emen and women employees of the Forest Service are loyal, dedicated, and hard-working persons They work many hours of unpaid overtime to get the job done They are unselfish, giving a great deal of their own time and effort to community activities, such as the Boy Scouts, Camp Fire Girls, 4-s, United Fund, Rotary, Lions, and other service organizations. The wives of these men are exceptional and fine women who do their part in community af fairs They snow that housing and living conditions in the Forest Service are sometimes undesirable and in isolated places, but they cheerfully accept them It has been very pleasant working for and with the great number of persons who have been on this forest I have appreciated this lengthy opportunity to know and make friends with some very fine people, and thank them for their help and pleasant associations One reason for this long opportunity was a letter I received from MrShirley Buck of the Regional Office when I started to work in Lakeview e said "It is hoped you will stay a considerable length of time" I thought he meant it.
    [Show full text]