Taking Charge... Making
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Open the Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan Announces Support for the Trestle and the Trail by Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair
HERESCENT Fall 1999 Vol X No. 4 Coalition Hosts "Open The Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan announces support for the trestle and the Trail By Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair One of the best ways to build support and stewardship of the Capital Crescent Trail is to provide opportunities for trail users and local residents to experience trail advocacy in a personal way. On Saturday, October 23d, the Coalition for the Capital Crescent Trail did just that. Trail lovers from all around the metropolitan area participated in Coalition-sponsored hikes, both walking and biking, to the Rock Creek Park trestle for an "Open The Trestle" rally. Several Coalition Board members addressed the rally, and outlined why I repairing and opening the trestle for Trail use was essential for completing a first class interim trail to Silver Spring. Results of a Coalition sponsored I engineering design study were presented that show how the trestle can be rebuilt for Trail use at a t Dozrg Dz~ncanut rally fraction of the cost of building a new bridge. Joining rally participants was Montgomery County Executive, Mr. Doug Duncan, who spoke in support of completing the Trail. In a surprise announcement, Mr. Duncan pledged to put funding to rebuild the trestle in the upcoming FY 2001-2002 budget. He challenged trail supporters to do their part and get the support of the five County Council members needed to pass the budget. Mr. Duncan's pledge of support is a very welcome event, and allows the Coalition to focus its advocacy for the trestle on the Montgomery County council. -
Marylandinfluencers
MarylandInfluencers f there was one place where the Democratic Party could take sol- ace on Election Day 2010, it was Maryland, a rock that broke part Iof the red tide sweeping the country. In a year where Republi- cans hoped to make gains across the board, Democrats proved their dominance in the biggest races, holding the governor’s mansion in a landslide, losing just a handful of seats in the state House of Delegates, and actually gaining ground in the state Senate. Any doubts about how deep blue Maryland is—particularly within the state’s heavily populated central corridor—were surely dissipated. Yet the next few years will be pivotal for both parties. Age and term limits are taking their toll on veteran officeholders, opening up op- portunities for ambitious Republicans and Democrats alike to make their mark. The blood sport of redistricting will play out as well. Here is our list of the Democrats and Republicans who are helping to make the decisions and start the important political conversations today in the Chesapeake Bay State—as well as some likely to play a bigger role in the future. Top 10 Republicans Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. GOP voters for representatives who her husband. She may be ending her The only Republican governor in Mary- are fiscally conservative and socially conservative talk radio show on WBAL land since the 1960s was dealt a huge moderate. 1090-AM in Baltimore—a thorn in blow in November when his rematch Democratic sides for years—but she will with O’Malley ended in a landslide loss. -
Newly Unsealed Report
Case 8:18-cv-03821-TDC Document 468-1 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 116 Expert Report Prepared By J. Thomas Manger In Hispanic National Law Enforcement Assoc. NCR et al. v. Prince George’s County et al., United States District Court District of Maryland Civil Action No.: 8:18-cv-03821-TDC 1 CONFIDENTIAL Case 8:18-cv-03821-TDC Document 468-1 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 116 TABLE OF CONTENTS Experience ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 7 Materials Reviewed ........................................................................................................................ 7 Summary of Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 8 Landscape of Policing in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area .............................................. 10 A. Recruitment ................................................................................................................ 11 B. Background on Prince George’s County Police Department ...................................... 12 Analysis and Opinions ................................................................................................................... 14 PART 1. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EEO COMPLAINT PROCEDURES ....................................... 14 A. Prince George’s -
Basin Bridge Board of Inquiry Representation by Nina Arron, Submitter 103484
Basin Bridge Board of Inquiry Representation by Nina Arron, submitter 103484 1. I am an urban planner and former Wellington resident. I now live in New Rochelle, New York. 2. I view the proposed flyover as an outdated 20th Century solution to something that I do not believe is even a problem. We are in a time of transition to more sustainable modes of transport and improved walkability, cycling and public transport options over designing solely for the private car. 3. This transition is driven by the desire for a more sustainable transport system, but it is also driven by evidence from many countries that there is a mismatch between transport agencies’ modelling, which assumes that the use of cars will continue to grow on a “business as usual” basis, and a reality that is rapidly undermining that assumption. 4. I have provided an Appendix of supplementary material. This consists of an article which I wrote for Wellington online news site Scoop entitled “Transportation in the 21st Century: The Modelling/Reality Gap”, published on 11 November 2013. Together with this article, I have included the text of three references linked to in the article, showing recent examples from the US, Canada and Australia of transport projects that have failed to meet or even come close to their stated goals because transport modellers projected continued traffic growth which failed to eventuate. 5. This phenomenon can also be observed in New Zealand, as the final article I have supplied, “Kiwi Teens Turn Off Driving”, shows. To quote from the article: A worldwide trend known as "driving ambivalence" has hit young people in New Zealand. -
Federal Asian Pacific American Council 30Th NATIONAL
Federal Asian Pacific American Council 30th NATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM May 4 - 8, 2015, Hilton Rockville, Maryland th FAPAC 30 NATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM 1 Table of Contents Message from President ................................................................................ 2 Message from Conference Chair ............................................................... 3 About FAPAC .................................................................................................. 4 Sponsors, Partners and Volunteers .............................................................. 6 Lifetime Members ........................................................................................... 7 Chapter Highlights .......................................................................................... 8 Year In Review ................................................................................................ 9 Military Awardees .........................................................................................10 Civilian Awardees .........................................................................................11 FAPAC Scholarship Endowment Fund ......................................................12 Greeting Letters ............................................................................................13 30th National Leadership Training Program Agenda ............................21 Preconference Agency Workshop ...........................................................26 Keynote and Guest Speakers -
22900000* Montgomery County, Maryland
h PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 31, 2010 NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Fitch Ratings: AA+ Moody’s Investors Service: Standard and Poor’s: AA+ (See “Ratings”) In the opinion of Special Counsel, assuming compliance with certain covenants, the interest portion of the Purchase Installments to be made by the County as Purchaser under the Conditional Purchase Agreement and to be received by the Holders of the Certificates is excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations and decision, and under existing law the interest portion of such Purchase Installments is exempt from income taxation by the State of Maryland. No opinion is expressed as to estate or inheritance taxes, or any other Maryland taxes not levied or assessed directly on the interest on the Certificates. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. The interest portion of the Purchase Installments, for federal income tax purposes, is not includable in the alternative minimum taxable income of individuals, o buy be accepted prior to the time the Official corporations or other taxpayers as an enumerated item of tax preference or other specific adjustment and is not taken into account in determining “adjusted current earnings” for purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax on corporations; however, interest on the Purchase Installments will be subject to the branch profits tax imposed on foreign corporations engaged in a trade or business in the United States of America. e any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which suc $22,900,000* MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (Public Transportation Equipment Acquisition) Series 2010 Evidencing Proportionate Interests in a Conditional Purchase Agreement Dated: Date of Initial Delivery Due: As shown on inside front cover The Certificates are being issued to finance the acquisition of certain equipment (the “Equipment”) to be used in the public transportation program of Montgomery County, Maryland (the “County”). -
Isiah Leggett, Montgomery County Executive 2006
Isiah Leggett, Montgomery County Executive 2006- 2018 Served in Vietnam, January - December 1969 From January to December 1969, Isiah “Ike” Leggett served as a Captain in the United States Army during the Vietnam War, first in combat with a Military Advisory Unit attached to the Army of the Republic of Vietnam and then as a public affairs officer with the 7th Support Battalion/199th Light Infantry Brigade. He was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, the Vietnam Service and Vietnam Campaign Medals. Leggett was the first African American to be elected to the County Council. He served four terms as an At- Large Member (1986 - 2002). He also served as the Council's President three times (1991, 1998, 1999) and as its Vice-President three times (1990, 1997 and 2002). As a Council Member he also chaired the Council's Transportation and Environment Committee and served on the Education Committee. In November 2006, Leggett was elected to a four-year term as Montgomery County Executive. He was overwhelmingly reelected in 2010 and 2014. He served as President of the County Executives of America in 2013 - 2014 and as President of the Maryland Association of Counties in 2015. Born in Deweyville, Texas on July 25, 1945, Leggett was raised in small-town Alexandria, Louisiana, where he grew up as the seventh of 12 children in a four room house without in-door plumbing. His father worked at the local saw mill. His mother, he remembers, always focused on education as the way to get ahead and build a better life. While studying at Southern University, Leggett was elected student body president, commanded the university's Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets, and was a campus and community leader in the struggle for civil rights. -
December 1988 an Amendment to the Sector Plan for Four Corners And
APPROVED AND ADOPTED AMENDMENT . TO THE SECTOR PLAN FOR FOUR CORNERS AND VICINITY December 1988 An amendment to the Sector Plan For Four Corners and Vicinity, 1986, being also an amendment to the General Plan for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District and the Master Plan of Highways within Montgomery County, Maryland. Prepared By: THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION Montgomery County Planning Board 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20910-3760 . Revised By: THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY EXECUTIVE May 16, 1988 Approved By: THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL October 25, 1988 Adopted By: THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION December 14, 1988 PLEASE RETURN T~ OFFlCE OF PLANNiNG POLICIES 101 MONROE STREET 4TH fl ROCKVILLE, MD 20850 ABSTRACT TITLE: Approved and Adopted Amendment to the Sector Plan for Four corners and Vicinity AUTHOR: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission SUBJECT: Approved and Adopted Amendment to the Sector Plan for Four Corners and Vicinity DATE: December, 1988 PLANNING AGENCY: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission SOURCE OF COPIES: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20907 NUMBER OF PAGES: 4 ABSTRACT: This publication contains the text for a proposed amendment to the Sector Plan for Four Corners and Vicinity, 1986, being also an amendment to the General Plan for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District and the Master Plan of Highways within Montgomery County, Maryland. The amendment provides traffic standards for development on the Kay Tract. - - - - -...- - ---. - . -..... CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL AND ADOPTION This Amendment to the Sector Plan for Four Corners and Vicinity, 1986: the General Plan for the Physical Development .of the Maryland-Washington Regional District: and the Master Plan of Highways within Montgomery County, Maryland: has been approved by the Montgomery county Council, sitting as the District Council, by Resolution No. -
Our History and Government
Montgomery County Maryland OurOur History History and and Government Government General Richard Montgomery Montgomery County, Maryland Our History and Government A Joint Project of Montgomery County, Maryland and the Montgomery County Historical Society ———————— Copyright © 1999 Montgomery County Government Office of Public Information Rockville, Maryland 20850 ————————— To learn more about Montgomery County, Maryland, please visit the county web site: www.co.mo.md.us or the web site of the Montgomery County Historical Society: www.montgomeryhistory.org CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................1 History of the County..........................................................3 Principal Historic Events..................................................21 Official Symbols Montgomery County Emblem ............................. 23 Coat of Arms .......................................................... 23 County Bird and Blossom .................................... 24 Flag of Montgomery County................................ 25 County Executives and Council Members, Past to Present...................26 County Demographics......................................................29 INTRODUCTION Montgomery County is proud of its history. From Indian stone quarries and trails to present day high technology centers, it has played an integral part in the develop ment of this country. By settling the frontier in the 1700s, supporting independence, and ceding Georgetown for the new capital, the -
Potomacpotomac Page 8
Wellbeing PotomacPotomac Page 8 Weathering Another Storm News, Page 5 Real Estate 6 Real Estate ❖ Sports 7 ❖ Calendar, Page 11 ❖ Classified, Page 10 Classified, Slates Set for Primary Elections A pileated wood- News, Page 2 pecker forages midst Monday’s snowstorm in a Potomac backyard. anac Why Care about Ten Mile Creek? Opinion, Page 4 State Basketball Playoffs Delayed Sports, Page 7 Photo Mary Kimm/The Alm Photo online at potomacalmanac.com www.ConnectionNewspapers.comMarch 5-11, 2014 Potomac Almanac ❖ March 5-11, 2014 ❖ 1 News June primary will likely settle many Slates Set for Primary Elections county races. Compiled by Ken Moore Green Party candidate Tim Willard. The Almanac Board of Education he filing deadline for candidates While the Board of Education also has at- who plan to run for their party’s General Assembly: Potomac is large and district members, it works differ- nominations was Feb. 25, and divided between District 15 ently than for County Council. While can- T and 16 with one state senator many races for local and state didates for Board of Education in a given offices are now set. The Primary Election is and three delegates per dis- district must live inside the boundaries of scheduled for June 24. Currently there are trict. the district, all voters in the county will vote no elected Republicans from Montgomery to choose members for each district and the County, so in many cases the winners of the County Coun- at-large member. Democratic primary on June 24 will be the cil, District 1 Members of the Board of Education serve likely winner in November. -
Alabama at a Glance
ALABAMA ALABAMA AT A GLANCE ****************************** PRESIDENTIAL ****************************** Date Primaries: Tuesday, June 1 Polls Open/Close Must be open at least from 10am(ET) to 8pm (ET). Polls may open earlier or close later depending on local jurisdiction. Delegates/Method Republican Democratic 48: 27 at-large; 21 by CD Pledged: 54: 19 at-large; 35 by CD. Unpledged: 8: including 5 DNC members, and 2 members of Congress. Total: 62 Who Can Vote Open. Any voter can participate in either primary. Registered Voters 2,356,423 as of 11/02, no party registration ******************************* PAST RESULTS ****************************** Democratic Primary Gore 214,541 77%, LaRouche 15,465 6% Other 48,521 17% June 6, 2000 Turnout 278,527 Republican Primary Bush 171,077 84%, Keyes 23,394 12% Uncommitted 8,608 4% June 6, 2000 Turnout 203,079 Gen Election 2000 Bush 941,173 57%, Gore 692,611 41% Nader 18,323 1% Other 14,165, Turnout 1,666,272 Republican Primary Dole 160,097 76%, Buchanan 33,409 16%, Keyes 7,354 3%, June 4, 1996 Other 11,073 5%, Turnout 211,933 Gen Election 1996 Dole 769,044 50.1%, Clinton 662,165 43.2%, Perot 92,149 6.0%, Other 10,991, Turnout 1,534,349 1 ALABAMA ********************** CBS NEWS EXIT POLL RESULTS *********************** 6/2/92 Dem Prim Brown Clinton Uncm Total 7% 68 20 Male (49%) 9% 66 21 Female (51%) 6% 70 20 Lib (27%) 9% 76 13 Mod (48%) 7% 70 20 Cons (26%) 4% 56 31 18-29 (13%) 10% 70 16 30-44 (29%) 10% 61 24 45-59 (29%) 6% 69 21 60+ (30%) 4% 74 19 White (76%) 7% 63 24 Black (23%) 5% 86 8 Union (26%) -
County Executive 1968-1994
MONTGOMERY COUNTY ARCHIVES Guide to the Records of the COUNTY EXECUTIVE 1968-1994 Record Group 1: Executive Branch March 25, 1999 Revised August 20, 2015 Revised October 6, 2015 Montgomery County Archives Montgomery County Records Center 8540 Anniversary Circle, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 (301) 926-5002 [email protected] www.montgomeryhistory.org GUIDE TO THE RECORDS OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE 1968-1994 Record Group 1: Executive Branch ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY Under the provisions of the Montgomery County Charter of 1948, both executive and legislative powers resided in the County Council, which appointed a County Manager to serve at the Council’s discretion. However, the County Council-County Manager system was seen to be inadequate for the rapidly growing population of the County who were demanding more services and accountability from the local government. Many citizens and civic groups called for a charter review to determine whether the executive, administrative, and legislative functions should be separated and an independent County Executive elected by the voters for a four year term. Although the Charter Review Committee appointed in 1965 opposed this plan, the County Council ignored its advice, and submitted the question of an elected County Executive to the voters in 1966, when it was soundly defeated. The County Council was undeterred, and, early in 1967, Council members Richmond M. Keeney and Idamae Garrott proposed the establishment of another commission “to draft a new charter, which would provide for full separation of powers and an elected county executive” [Washington Post and Washington Star, January 11, 1967, as quoted on page 370 in Richard K.