DOCSLIB.ORG

W Is D Determined Eligible for the National Register D See Continuation Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
W Is D Determined Eligible for the National Register D See Continuation Sheet JPS Form 10-9CO CM3 No. 10024-OOiB (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service JAM '• 8 ^:H National Register of Historic Places MAR 1 1 1996 Registration Form NAT. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for indtvidu ns in How to Complete tfie National Register of Historic Places Registration Perm {National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not appry to tne property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architecture classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from (he instructions. Place additional entnes and narrative items on.continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete aJI items. 1. Name of Property____________________________________________________ historic name San Pedro Municipal Ferry Building_________________________ other names/site number LOS Angeles Maritime Museum__________________ 2. Location street & number Berth 84. Foot of 6th Street not for publication city or town San- Pedrn t) vicinity state California code county LOS Angeles code Q37 zip code SQ731 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that tnisO nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the proceduraJ and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Q- meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D natiopatty~D statewide O IccaJry. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) j^^'felM. &h/U Signature off cfcnifyihg official/Title ' Dafe Staf/e H'i-s-tToric Preservation Officer State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet tne National Register criteria. (Q See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau Y] ———— — -- 4. National Park Service Certification A „ /y(o^:-x'' ^ f Y~*\ I herebycertify that the property is: ignature of iftff KeepeJ ~*\ Date of Action Sentered in the National Register. Q See continuation sheet. , w Is D determined eligible for the National Register D See continuation sheet. D determined not eligible for the National Register. D removed from the National Register. D other, (explain:) _________ San Hedru Municipal Perry BuiIding Lns Angeles, California Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property {Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do net include previously listed resources in the count. Q private C3 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing H public-local D district 1 buildings D public-State D site D public-Federal D structure sites D object structures objects 1 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register N/A 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) •Transportation/Water Related Recreation and Culture/Museum 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Mnderne foundation concrete walls plaster roof flat/comnnsltion roofina other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) See Continuation Sheets, pages (j through 3 San Pedro Nhinicipal Ferry Building Los Angeles, California Name of Property County and Slate 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria 'Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) Transportation/Marltime History G A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of Architecture our history. D B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. G5 C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1941-1945____ D D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all (he boxes that apply.) • N/A —————— Property is: D A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person D B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. N/A _____ D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Irvine. 'B. /Los Aneles Harbor Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibilography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) (see attached Sheet) Previous documentation on file (NFS): Primary location of additional data: Q preliminary determination of individual listing (36 D State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested Q Other State agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National Hi Local government Register D University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: World Port Los Angeles/Harbor Dept files D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ____________ San Pedro Municipal Ferry Building Los .Angeles, California Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 3.09 acres UTM References {Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) till 3 8 L6 4 0 3 73 3 16 8 0 1 I I I I I 1 ! I ! ! I i I 1 3 ___ J_I Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 4! , I I I , CD See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet. 11. Form Prepared By name/title Dr. Shell O. Smith. Curator organization Los .Angeles Maritime Museum_____ ___ date September 26, 1995 street & number Berth 84, Foot of 6th Street __ telephone (310) 548-7618 city or town San Pedro________________ state Call f. 2jp C0de 90731 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map {7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) City of Los Angeles name Department of Recreation and Parks___________________________ street & number 200 M. Main Street, Room 1330 telephone 213-485-5538 city or town Los Angeles____________________ state Calif. zip code 9QQ12 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief. Administrative Services Division, NationaJ Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018). Washington, DC 20503. NPSFormlO-90G-a CMB Approval No. 1024-001B (8-S6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet San Pedro Municipal Ferry Building Section number 2.___ D—— ° Los Angeles County, California The San Pedro Municipal Ferry Building is a one and two story, irregularly massed bulding of cubic shapes with rounded convex and concave fluted and smooth corners and a large central tower. The building was constructed in 1941 of wood and plaster. In 1977 the building was remodeled for use as the Los Angeles Maritime Museum. Major changes included enclosing the original drive-through for cars, plastering over three large plate glass windows on the front elevation, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hergé and Tintin
    Hergé and Tintin PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:32:26 UTC Contents Articles Hergé 1 Hergé 1 The Adventures of Tintin 11 The Adventures of Tintin 11 Tintin in the Land of the Soviets 30 Tintin in the Congo 37 Tintin in America 44 Cigars of the Pharaoh 47 The Blue Lotus 53 The Broken Ear 58 The Black Island 63 King Ottokar's Sceptre 68 The Crab with the Golden Claws 73 The Shooting Star 76 The Secret of the Unicorn 80 Red Rackham's Treasure 85 The Seven Crystal Balls 90 Prisoners of the Sun 94 Land of Black Gold 97 Destination Moon 102 Explorers on the Moon 105 The Calculus Affair 110 The Red Sea Sharks 114 Tintin in Tibet 118 The Castafiore Emerald 124 Flight 714 126 Tintin and the Picaros 129 Tintin and Alph-Art 132 Publications of Tintin 137 Le Petit Vingtième 137 Le Soir 140 Tintin magazine 141 Casterman 146 Methuen Publishing 147 Tintin characters 150 List of characters 150 Captain Haddock 170 Professor Calculus 173 Thomson and Thompson 177 Rastapopoulos 180 Bianca Castafiore 182 Chang Chong-Chen 184 Nestor 187 Locations in Tintin 188 Settings in The Adventures of Tintin 188 Borduria 192 Bordurian 194 Marlinspike Hall 196 San Theodoros 198 Syldavia 202 Syldavian 207 Tintin in other media 212 Tintin books, films, and media 212 Tintin on postage stamps 216 Tintin coins 217 Books featuring Tintin 218 Tintin's Travel Diaries 218 Tintin television series 219 Hergé's Adventures of Tintin 219 The Adventures of Tintin 222 Tintin films
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetics and Visual Resources
    1 Section 3.1 2 Aesthetics and Visual Resources 3 SECTION SUMMARY 4 This section characterizes the existing aesthetic conditions in the proposed Project area and assesses how 5 the construction and operation of the proposed Project or an alternative would alter them. The aesthetics 6 and visual resources impact analysis evaluates and identifies potential impacts associated with 7 implementation of the proposed Project or an alternative on locally-designated scenic highways, scenic 8 resources, light and glare, and visual character of the proposed Project area. 9 The primary features of the proposed Project and alternatives that could affect aesthetic resources include 10 the addition of up to 12 new cranes, additional berthed ships, and additional terminal lighting. Additional 11 features and activities such as redeveloped buildings and stored containers are also considered in this 12 analysis. 13 Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, provides the following: 14 A description of existing visual characteristics in the Port area (including photographs); 15 A description of key areas from which the proposed Project or alternatives would be visible; 16 A description of existing night lighting conditions; 17 A description of applicable local, state, and federal regulations and policies regarding visual 18 resources and scenic highway designations in the proposed Project area; 19 A discussion of the methodology used to determine whether the proposed Project or alternatives 20 would result in an impact to aesthetic and visual resources; 21 An impact analysis of the proposed Project and six alternatives, which includes simulated photos 22 of the proposed future build-out conditions; and, 23 A description of proposed mitigation measures intended to reduce potential impacts, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • WATSON 135,727 SF INDUSTRIAL CENTER Available for Lease
    WATSON 135,727 SF INDUSTRIAL CENTER Available For Lease Watson Building 139 720 WatsonCenter Road, Carson, CA 90745 VALUE ADVANTAGE SPECIFICATIONS Additional 2.48 Acres for BUILDING SIZE: 135,727 SF MINIMUM CLEARANCE: 27’ - 29’ Trailer Storage OFFICE SIZE: 8,462 SF DOCK HIGH TRUCK POSITIONS: 23 - 8’ x 8’ Potential merchandise processing fee savings with GROUND LEVEL RAMPS: 1 - 12’ x 15’ Foreign Trade Zone 202 LAND SIZE: 427,146 SF activation TRUCK TURNING RADIUS: 323’ POWER: 1,200 amps, 277/480 volts, Master Planned Center 3 phase, 4 wire Close to Ports of Los Angeles, WAREHOUSE LIGHTING: T5 Long Beach and Los Angeles International Airport SPRINKLER SYSTEM: .40 GPM/3,000 SF Convenient access to the San Diego (405), Harbor (110), PARKING SPACES: 113 Long Beach (710), Artesia (91) and Terminal Island (103) YEAR BUILT: 1991 Freeways. Near Intermodal Container Transfer Facility WATSON LAND COMPANY 310.952.6401 www.watsonlandcompany.comwatsonlandcompany.com WATSON 135,727 SF INDUSTRIAL CENTER Available For Lease WATSON BUILDING 139 SITE PLAN 139 OFFICE PLAN 8,462 SF WATSON CENTER ROAD Gate OPEN OFFICE AREA LOBBY Entry Main Break Oce Room Area W W M M OPEN OFFICE AREA 139’ OPEN OFFICE AREA 135,727 SF Storage Container Approx. 2.48 Acres for 2.48 Acres Approx. AVALON BLVD. 99’ 8” 23 DH POSITIONS WCC 139 OFFICE PLAN revised | StudioCanvas | 01.04.11 Chain Link Fence N 250’ 323’ The information on this brochure has been compiled for the internal administra- tive convenience of Watson Land Company. Watson Land Company makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy of this brochure.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] Map of Terminal Island Showing portion of East San Pedro as recorded in Book 52, Page 13, Miscl Records. Stock#: 48538 Map Maker: Southern Pacific Railroad Company Date: 1910 circa Place: n.p. Color: Condition: VG- Size: 31 x 65 inches Price: SOLD Description: Fine early map of Terminal Island, in San Pedro California, drawn for the Southern Pacific Railroad. The map illustrates Terminal Island at the beginning of its modern history, before the island was substantially reshaped and modified by dredging and reclamation projects that created the modern harbors at San Pedro and Long Beach. The map show the City of San Pedro at the right, with the lines of the Southern Pacific. Below, a line identified as Los Angeles Terminal Railway traverses Terminal Island, with a railway station, Hotel Site, Mill, Lumber Yard and Coal Yard shown, along with several wharfs. The location of the Catalina Yacht club is also noted (constructed in 1898). The map shows Morman (Mormon) Island and Smith Island, both of which have also been dramatically reshaped by modern port projects. Mormon Island was the site of an short-lived settlement attempt by San Bernardino-based Mormon pioneers in the 1850s. Terminal Island The island was originally called Isla Raza de Buena Gente and later Rattlesnake Island. It was renamed Terminal Island in 1891. In 1891, the Terminal Land Company purchased the island and a railway was built on to its east side by the Los Angeles Terminal Railroad Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis in Pdf Format
    FURUSATO - The Lost Village of Terminal Island Those who came of age during World War II have been called “The Greatest Generation”. On Terminal Island, California this generation is known as the ‘Nisei’ – or second generation Japanese, the American-born sons and daughters of immigrant parents. On the southern edge of the Port of Los Angeles, this isolated village offered a unique childhood experience. More than 3000 residents lived in a very small area known as Fish Harbor in San Pedro, 99% of whom were Japanese or Japanese American. While their parents worked as fishermen or cannery workers, the Nisei’s memory of Terminal Island is as an idyllic place, where they were often allowed to roam free, share dinner at a friend’s house, or dive for abalone near the beach. The culture of Japan was everywhere, from the Shinto Shrine to the Japanese Fisherman’s Hall where Kendo and Judo were taught. Physically and culturally isolated, the residents developed a unique dialect which combined Japanese and English – often in ways that were confusing to outsiders who spoke one or the other. The Terminal Island ‘lingo’ was symbolic of their status in California, accepted by neither the majority culture nor by other Japanese, the Terminal Islanders came to refer to themselves as ‘Yogores’ – dark and dirty on the outside, but pure and clean of heart within. As the Nisei grew older, they attended San Pedro High School and began to share American traditions with their Issei parents. Baseball games became a weekly event, sponsored by village businesses and fishermen.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey Report
    F.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE SAN PEDRO WATERFRONT PROJECT LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Los Angeles Harbor Department Environmental Management Division 425 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, California 90733 Prepared by: ICF Jones & Stokes 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90017 213/627-5376 August 2008 Table of Contents SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 2 II. REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................ 3 FEDERAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................ 3 STATE REGULATIONS ...................................................................................... 4 LOCAL REGULATIONS ..................................................................................... 6 III. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 7 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................. 7 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SETTING .............................................................. 7 ETHNOGRAPHY ................................................................................................. 9 HISTORIC BACKGROUND .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rickover and the Nuclear Navy Rickover and the Nuclear Navy
    The Preface on pages xvii-xix has been altered to correct a typesetting error in the printed book. All of the text is unchanged, but sections of the text have been rearranged to place paragraphs in the proper order. Rickover and the Nuclear Navy Rickover and the Nuclear Navy THE DISCIPLINE OF TECHNOLOGY by Francis Duncan Naval Institute Press Annapolis, Maryland Published 1989 by the United States Naval Institute Annapolis, Maryland Copyright © 1989 on the foreword All rights reserved. Prepared by the Department of Energy; work made for hire. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Duncan, Francis, 1922- Rickover and the nuclear navy : the discipline of technology / by Francis Duncan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-87021-236-2 1. Rickover, Hyman George. 2. Nuclear submarines—United States— History. 3. Admirals—United States—Biography 4. United States. Navy—Biography. I. Title. V63.R54D86 1989 359.3'2574'0973—dc20 89-39097 CIP This edition is authorized for sale only in the United States, its territories and possessions, and Canada. Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 First printing Contents Foreword vii Preface xvii Acknowledgments xxv 1. Common Denominators 1 2. Submarines 17 3. Thresher 52 4. Surface Ships—First Battles 99 5. Surface Ships—The Alliance with Congress 115 6. Surface Ships—Legislating Nuclear Power into the Fleet 147 7. Technology and Diplomacy: The Multilateral Force 170 8. Shippingport 190 9. The Devil Is in the Details 232 10. Independence and Control 252 11. Discipline of Technology 279 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of CARSON FINAL Initial Study/Negative Declaration for The
    CITY OF CARSON FINAL Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Shippers Transport Express Container Storage Project City of Carson 701 E. Carson Street Carson, CA 90745 Contact: Max Castillo (310)-952-1761 ext. 1317 Prepared by: ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT, INC. 1000-A Ortega Way, Suite A Placentia, CA 92870 (714) 632-8521 November 2019 CHAPTER 1 –PROJECT DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SHIPPERS TRANSPORT EXPRESS RELOCATION PROJECT Page No. CHAPTER 1.0: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Agency Authority.................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Historic Site Uses .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1 2149 East Sepulveda Boulevard ................................................................ 1-2 1.4.2 1150 East Sepulveda Boulevard ................................................................. 1-2 1.5 Project Description.................................................................................................. 1-4 CHAPTER 2.0: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2-1 General Information
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Law Enforcement Phone Numbers
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT PHONE NUMBERS LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S - STATIONS Altadena (07) ................................................ 780 E. Altadena Dr., Altadena 91001 .................................. 626-798-1131 Avalon (18) .................................................... 215 Summer Ave., P.O. Box 1551, Avalon 90704 .......... 310-510-0174 Carson (16) ..................................................... 21356 S. Avalon Blvd., Carson 90745 .................................. 310-830-1123 Century (21) .................................................. 11703 Alameda, Lynwood 90262 ........................................... 323-567-8121 Compton ........................................................... 301 S. Willowbrook Avenue, Compton 90220 ............................................................ Crescenta Valley (07) ................................. 4554 N. Briggs Ave., La Crescenta 91214 ............................. 818-248-3464 East Los Angeles (02) ................................. 5019 E. Third St., Los Angeles 90022 .................................... 323-264-4151 Industry (14) .................................................. 150 N. Hudson Ave., City of Industry ............................................ 626-330-3322 Lakewood (13)............................................... 5130 N. Clark Ave., Lakewood 90712 ................................... 562-866-9061 Lancaster (11) ............................................... 501W. Lancaster Blvd., Lancaster 93534.............................. 661-948-8466
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C Aesthetics and Visual Resources: Sensitive Public Views of the PMPU Area
    APPENDIX C Aesthetics and Visual Resources: Sensitive Public Views of the PMPU Area 1 Critical views for impact evaluations conducted for aesthetics and visual resources, as addressed in 2 Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, are defined as those sensitive public views that would be 3 most affected by a proposed action, such as the greatest intensity of impact due to viewer proximity to a 4 project, the project’s visibility, and the duration of the affected view. The analyses are based on “worst- 5 case” circumstances of maximum proposed Program exposure to the most sensitive public views. It is a 6 premise of the technical approach that the range of critical public views potentially affected by the 7 proposed Program should be represented by the views chosen for analysis. This appendix presents an 8 initial consideration of sensitive public views of the PMPU area which are critical to the assessment of 9 impacts on aesthetics and visual resources within this area. 10 The region of influence for the aesthetics/visual resources impact analysis includes the Port, the Port of 11 Long Beach, and sensitive land uses near these ports (e.g., parks, beaches, tourist facilities, and residential 12 areas). Communities within the region include San Pedro, Rancho Palos Verdes, Wilmington, and Long 13 Beach. These points are located on all but the east side of the PMPU area. The sections below describe 14 views from all potentially critical view areas relative to the PMPU area, with the list of views most 15 relevant to impact evaluations for the PEIR representing a subset of all areas, as presented in Section 16 3.1.2.2, PMPU Area.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Cultural Resources
    3.4 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES 2 3.4.1 Introduction 3 This section describes the affected environment and regulatory setting for cultural 4 resources, as well as the impacts on cultural resources that would result from the 5 proposed Project and its alternatives, and the mitigation measures that would reduce 6 these impacts. Cultural resources customarily include archaeological resources, 7 ethnographic resources, and those of the historical built environment (architectural 8 resources). Though not specifically a cultural resource, paleontological resources 9 (fossils pre-dating human occupation) are considered here because they are discussed 10 in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (Environmental Checklist Form), in the 11 context of Section V, Cultural Resources. A paleontological technical report was 12 prepared for this project by Michael X. Kirby and Thomas A. Deméré of the 13 Department of PaleoServices at the San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, 14 California, and is attached as Appendix F.1 to this document. Information pertaining 15 to prehistoric and historical archaeological resources is based in part upon the 16 archaeological resources study conducted by ICF Jones & Stokes that is attached as 17 Appendix F.2 to this document. Additionally, a technical report for the historical 18 built environment (architectural resources) is attached as Appendix F.3 to this 19 document. 20 CEQA Guidelines Section 15120(d) prohibits an EIR from including information 21 about the location of archaeological sites or sacred lands: “No document prepared 22 pursuant to this article that is available for public examination shall include… 23 information about the location of archaeological sites and sacred lands.” Therefore, 24 the specific locations of archaeological sites have been omitted from this chapter and 25 the cultural resources technical reports are a confidential appendix to this document.
    [Show full text]