Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0338-y

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Discovery and material study of the missing feet part from Magritte’s L’évidence éternelle of 1954 Catherine Defeyt1* , Francisca Vandepitte2, Elodie Herens1 and David Strivay1

Abstract One of the two missing canvases from L’évidence éternelle of 1954, the one of the feet, has been discovered beneath a small woman portrait painted in 1958, La toile de Pénélope. Indeed, the underlying woman’s feet revealed through the IRR and XRR images leave little doubt about the identity of the hidden composition. All the more so as the canvas dimensions perfectly match with the format ascribed to the feet part in the diagram Magritte made of the 1954 vari- ant of L’évidence éternelle. This paper presents the main results of the material study conducted on La toile de Pénélope by means of non-invasive and complementary imaging and analytical techniques. Furthermore, it proposes a virtual colorized reconstruction of the hidden picture, built on the basis of the XRR and IRR images, the elemental informa- tion provided by the MA-XRF analysis, the Raman results and the microscope examination of the painting surface. Keywords: Magritte, Painting, Non invasive

Introduction outstanding issues. Te specialists of the Belgian surreal- In the framework of the project Magritte on practice ist are then faced with a challenging task; the assessment (2015–2018), 50 oil paintings and 10 gouaches made by of the importance and the signifcance of the lost works. the artist between 1920 and 1967, and housed by the In that respect, the extended number of RMFAB paint- Magritte Museum (Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Bel- ings investigated through complementary imaging tech- gium—RMFAB), have been investigated in situ by means niques has greatly increased the chances of discovering of a mobile lab equipped with a large panel of non-inva- double paintings. Indeed, six double oil paintings have sive methods. Te implemented imaging and analytical been discovered within the corpus [2, 3]. techniques are: infrared refectography (IRR), X-ray radi- One of them is La toile de ◦Pénélope (René Magritte Cat- ography (XRR), high resolution visible and UV light pho- alogue Raisonné (RMCR) n 893 [4], RMFAB inv. 11699), tography, Raman spectroscopy (RS), digital microscopy, a small woman portrait executed in 1958, for which the and scanning X-ray fuorescence (MA-XRF). IRR and XRR images revealed the presence of two wom- Amongst the axes of research developed in the project an’s feet lying beneath the painting surface (Fig. 1a). Te there was the discovery of double paintings. Indeed, David discovered feet have been rapidly identifed as part of the Sylvester pointed out the fact that Magritte routinely third and last variant ◦Magritte made of L’évidence éter- reused the canvas supports from previous paintings. A nelle in 1954 (RMCR n 807 [4]). practice the author has correlated with the artist’s fnan- Tis paper presents an overview of the results obtained cial difculties, persisting until the 1940s [1]. Te quantity for La toile de Pénélope, which includes the current pic- and the quality of the overpainted compositions remain ture and the feet lying underneath. Te combination of imaging and analytical methods permitted collection of substantial information about the appearance of the *Correspondence: [email protected] hidden composition. Te present paper proposes a vir- 1 UR Art, Archéologie, Patrimoine, Université de Liège, 4000 Liege, tual colorized reconstruction of the lost ffth part from Full list of author information is available at the end of the article L’évidence éternelle, on the basis of these outcomes.

© The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creat​iveco​mmons​.org/licen​ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 2 of 8

Fig. 1 La toile de Pénélope La toile de Pénélope, 1958, oil on canvas, 24.6 14.8 cm, RMCR n◦ 893 , RMFAB inv. 11699 ©Charly Herscovici, Belgium. a × visible image, b IRR image, c XRR image. The IRR and XRR images unveiled the presence of two woman’s feet beneath the current picture

Experimental twelve investigated sites, with the lowest laser power necessary to obtain valuable results (ca. 30 mW). Te A high-resolution photographic documentation was frst ® gathered. Te full size images in visible light and under recorded spectra were treated using GRAMS . Data and ultra violet light have been acquired by using the home- images were all acquired on the museum site thanks to ® made scanning system of the CEA [5] and a D7500 Nikon the CEA mobile lab. ® camera with an AF-S Micro Nikkor 105 mm Nikon Results and discussion objective. Each close-up is recording a 4 cm × 3 cm area of the painting. Te images are then stitched as a pano- Te IRR and XRR images recorded for La toile de ® rama view with PTGui software . Tese photographs have Pénélope, (Fig. 1) revealed straightaway the presence of been enriched by X-ray radiography and infrared refec- two woman’s feet beneath the visible portrait. Te dis- tography images. Additionally, the painting surface has covered feet and the way they are displayed, undeni- ® been examined with a digital microscope ( Dino-Lite ). ably appear connected to L’évidence éternelle, a truncated In order to obtain further details on the hidden compo- female nude composed of fve separate small canvases,◦ sition and to get a better understanding of the pigments Magritte frst painted early on his career ( RMCR n 327 distribution through elemental maps, X-ray fuorescence [10]) and reproduced twice afterwards (Fig. 2). (XRF) spectroscopy was used in macro scanning mode Te prototype executed in 1930, possibly inspired by (MA-XRF). Te XRF scan of the whole painting has been Salvador Dali’s portraits enclosed in human body shapes, completed in approximately 8 h by using the CEA trans- shows a truncated nude of Georgette Magritte, painted in lation stage and homemade XRF system [6, 7], made of a a three-quarter view (Fig. 2a) [10]. In 1948, Magritte com- ® Moxtek Magnum X-ray tube (50 kV) (with a Ag anode), pleted another version of the work in which the model ® 2 a detector X-123SDD Amptek ( 25 mm ), with a resolu- (still not identifed) is portrayed in a frontal view (Fig. 2b) tion of 130 eV at 5.9 keV. Scanning step was set to 1 mm, [11]. We know from Sylvester that a third and last variant speed to 3 mm/s. X-ray tube was set to a voltage of 40 kV of L’évidence éternelle was attempted by Magritte in 1954 and a current of 120 µA. Spectra were treated in batch [4]. However, the entire completion of this late version mode using PyMCA [8], allowing separation of the sig- remained uncertain since, until recently, only three can- nals from the diferent chemical elements. vases have been traced (Fig. 2c): the face, the breast and Te analyses by Raman spectroscopy (RS) were per- the knees. Te canvas of the face corresponds to a small ® formed with the Enwave Optronics setup (portable woman’s portrait subsequently titled La ressemblance, Raman analyzer I-Dual-G), using a laser at 785 nm [9]. and stayed with Magritte until his death (Fig. 3a). Unfor- Tree Raman spectra were acquired for each of the tunately, its model, a young blond woman had not been Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 3 of 8

Fig. 2 L’évidence éternelle. a L’évidence éternelle, 1930, oil on fve canvases, 22 12, 19 24, 27 19, 22 16, 22 12, RMCR n◦ 327 [10] ©Charly × × × × × ◦ Herscovici, Belgium. b L’évidence éternelle, 1948, oil on fve canvases, 25.5 19.5, 19.3 32, 27 20.2, 20.5 26.6, 26 18, RMCR n 640 [11] × × × × ◦ × ©Charly Herscovici, Belgium. c L’évidence éternelle, 1954, oil on canvases, 20.5 15.6, 16 28, 21 20, RMCR n 807 [4] ©Charly Herscovici, Belgium × × × Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 4 of 8

Fig. 3 La ressemblance. a René Magritte posing with La ressemblance in the Mimosas house, in 1954, MRBAB/AACB, inv. 39739 ©Charly Herscovici, Belgium. b Project draft of L’évidence éternelle enclosed with a letter Magritte sent to Alexander Iolas in 1954 (Magritte archive, The Menil Foundation, Houston) Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 5 of 8

identifed. Te artist ofered the canvas of the breast and with the background color found in the part of the knees the one of the knees to Suzi Gablik, a young American (Fig. 4b). In the light of this outcome, the purple signature author who lived with the Magrittes for eight months in afxed in the upper right corner of La toile de Pénélope 1960 [12]. Gablik kept the canvas of the knees and sold (Fig. 5a) can be seen as a deliberate reminiscence of the the one of the breast to Robert Rauschenberg [4]. sacrifced picture. Te subject and the framing of the picture found Te examination of the painting surface with raking beneath La toile de Pénélope, but equally its size leave lit- light unveiled Magritte’s signature from the lost picture tle doubt about its provenance. Like the face, the breast in the lower left corner (Fig. 5b). Although the third and the knees belonging to the 1954 variant, the discov- canvas that should contain the navel is still missing, the ered feet are represented in a frontal view. Moreover, the discovery of the ffth part containg a signature strongly canvas dimensions (24.6 × 14.8 cm) perfectly match with indicates that Magritte would have actually painted a the stretcher format ascribed to the feet part (25 × 15 navel part as well and that this variant was once a com- cm) in the project draft of L’évidence éternelle from 1954 plete set. (Fig. 3b) [4]. Te Raman measurements performed on the purple Te underlying purple layer, punctually visible on under layer unscathed by the current brown background the right edge of the painting (Fig. 4a), can be reason- allowed the identifcation of Ultramarine, vermilion, lead ably considered as the background color behind the white and carbon black. In addition, the MA-XRF anal- feet. Indeed, the observed purple color perfectly tones ysis of the whole painting permitted the identifcation

Fig. 4 The background. a Purple under layer punctually visible on the right edge (magnifcation 50) and originating from the previous × background colour. The related purple shade has been achieved by mixing several pigments, including Vermilion, ultramarine, lead white and carbon black. b Part of the knees (21 20 cm) from the 1954 version of L’évidence éternelle ©Charly Herscovici, Belgium ×

Fig. 5 Signature. a Current purple signature afxed in the upper right corner. b Underlying signature from the feet part of L’évidence éternelle (1954) visible with raking light in the lower left corner Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 6 of 8

of inorganic pigments originating from both the vis- However, zinc white has been equally identifed from the ible image and the hidden composition. Te distribution painting surface, chiefy in the fesh tones. Besides tita- maps recorded for Hg and Pb (Fig. 6) support the pres- nium white and zinc white, the fesh tones involve iron ence of Vermilion and lead white in the overall back- oxides pigments with calcium contents, vermilion and ground color enclosing the feet. Te Hg scan provided ultramarine. Te brown background and the brown hair further information on the lost image since it made vis- have in common high contents of iron oxides and tita- ible the former signature lying just below the left foot as nium white (admixed with barite and strontium sulfde). a shadow. Concerning the feet themselves, the MA-XRF Te use of vermillion is prominent only in the nose and scans of the Zn, Fe and Ca elements (Fig. 6) indicate in the lips. fesh tones based on zinc white and iron oxide/hydroxide A colorized reconstruction of the feet part, built on the pigment(s) with Ca contents. basis of the overall information collected in the present Like reported for several other Magritte’s oil paint- study, is proposed in Fig. 7. Color hue has been identifed ings and observed in MA-XRF scan of the painting side, by looking at the right edge of the painting while con- the present canvas has been primed with two separate tours and shadows have been obtained by looking at the ground layers, a frst one based on lead white and a sec- Zn and Pb MA-XRF scans (Fig. 6). ond one based on zinc white [2, 13–16]. Te MA-XRF results (Fig. 6) and the Raman spectra related to the visible portrait led to the identifcation of Conclusions titanium white (anatase), barite, strontium sulfde, zinc Te woman’s feet revealed through the IRR and XRR white, vermilion, iron oxides with calcium contents, ivory images leave little doubt about the identity of the com- black and ultramarine. Te white pigment predominantly position lying beneath La toile de Pénélope. All the more, used for painting La toile de Pénélope is titanium white so do the dimensions of the canvas which totally match (anatase), associated with barite and strontium sulfde. the format ascribed to the feet part in the 1954 project

Fig. 6 MA-XRF. MA-XRF maps showing the distribution of Calcium (Ca K-ray), Titanium (Ti, K-ray), Iron (Fe, K-ray), Zinc (Zn, K-ray), Strontium (Sr, K-ray), Baryum (Ba, L-ray), Mercury (Hg, L-ray) and Lead (Pb, L-ray) for the whole painting. The grey scale corresponds to the intensity of the signal of each element, black being the minimum of the signal, white, the maximum Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 7 of 8

tends to evidence Magritte likely did complete the paint- ing of the navel as well. Acknowledgements The authors sincerely thank , General Director of the RMFAB for his commitment that greatly assisted this research. The authors would like also to express their gratitude to Ludovic Godfrin, Modern painting collection keeper at the RMFAB, for his technical assistance.

Authors’ contributions CD, EH and DS have realized the in situ measurements (imaging, XRF and Raman), CD, DS and FV have interpreted the results of the analysis. All authors read and approved the fnal manuscript.

Funding This project has received funding from the University of Liège (Belgium).

Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author details 1 UR Art, Archéologie, Patrimoine, Université de Liège, 4000 Liege, Belgium. 2 Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.

Received: 23 August 2019 Accepted: 6 November 2019

References 1. Sylvester D. Magritte. Arles: Actes Sud Beaux-Arts; 2009. 2. Defeyt C, Herens E, Leen F, Vandepitte F, Strivay D. Discovery and multi- analytical study of the last missing quarter from rené magritte’s la pose enchantée. Herit Sci. 2018;6(1):33. 3. Defeyt C, Vandepitte F, Herens E, Strivay D. Insight in René Magritte’s reused paintings. Talk at Technart19, Brugge May 7–10; 2019. Fig. 7 Virtual reconstruction. Virtual colorized reconstruction of the 4. Sylvester D, Whitfeld S, Raeburn M. René Magritte-Catalogue Raisonné, feet part from L’évidence éternelle (1954), built on the basis of the XRR tome 3: oil paintings, objects and bronzes 1949–1967. Paris: Flammarion; and IRR images, the MA-XRF results, the examination of the painting 1994. subsurface through digital microscopy and the chromatic range of 5. Strivay D, Clar M, Rakkaa S, Hocquet F-P, Defeyt C. Development of a the related knees part translation stage for in situ noninvasive analysis and high-resolution imaging. Appl Phys A. 2016;122(11):950. 6. Hocquet F-P, Garnir H-P, Marchal A, Clar M, Oger C, Strivay D. A remote controlled xrf system for feld analysis of cultural heritage objects. X-Ray draft Magritte made of L’évidence éternelle. Like the face, Spectrom. 2008;37(4):304–8. 7. Hocquet F-P, Calvo del Castillo H, Cervera Xicotencatl A, Bourgeois C, the breast and the knees, the feet from the 1954 variant Oger C, Marchal A, Clar M, Rakkaa S, Micha E, Strivay D. Elemental 2d have been portrayed in a frontal view. Te model’s pose imaging of paintings with a mobile edxrf system. Anal Bioanal Chem. is therefore much closer to the 1948 version than to the 2011;399(9):3109–16. 8. Solé VA, Papillon E, Cotte M, Walter P, Susini J. A multiplatform code for prototype, within Georgette Magritte which was painted the analysis of energy-dispersive x-ray fuorescence spectra. Spectrochim in a three-quarter view. Acta Part B At Spectrosc. 2007;62(1):63–8. Because it perfectly matches with the purple back- 9. Lauwers D, Hutado AG, Tanevska V, Moens L, Bersani D, Vandena- beele P. Characterisation of a portable raman spectrometer for in situ ground of the knees, the purple under layer visible in analysis of art objects. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. some places on the right edge of La toile de Pénélope 2014;118:294–301. most probably corresponds to the background color of 10. Sylvester D, Whitfeld S. René Magritte—Catalogue Raisonné, tome 1: oil paintings 1916–1930. Paris: Flammarion; 1992. the feet. In the light of this outcome, the purple signature 11. Sylvester D, Whitfeld S. René Magritte—Catalogue Raisonné, tome 2: oil in the upper right corner of La toile de Pénélope, appears paintings and objects 1931–1948. Paris: Flammarion; 1993. as a reminiscence of the sacrifced composition. 12. Gablik S. Magritte. Bruxelles: Cosmos monographies; 1978. 13. Van der Snickt G, Martins A, Delaney J, Janssens K, Zeibel J, Dufy M, With regards to the last missing canvas from L’évidence McGlinchey C, Driel BV, Dik J. Exploring a hidden painting below the éternelle of 1954, the discovery of the signed feet part surface of René Magritte’s Le Portrait. Appl Spectrosc. 2016;70(1):57–67. 14. da Silva AT, Legrand S, Van der Snickt G, Featherstone R, Janssens K, Bot- tinelli G. Ma-xrf imaging on rené magritte’s la condition humaine: insights Defeyt et al. Herit Sci (2019) 7:96 Page 8 of 8

into the artist’s palette and technique and the discovery of a third quarter Ormsby B, Scharf M, Carlyle L, Heydenreich G, Keune K. (eds.) Investiga- of la pose enchantée. Herit Sci. 2017;5(1):37. tion on the speckles syndrome afecting late 1920s oil paintings by René 15. Dufy M, Martins A, Boon JJ. Issues in contemporary oil paint. In: van Magritte, Chap. 19. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 180–8. den Berg KJ, Burnstock A, de Keijzer M, Krueger J, Learner T, de Tagle A, Heydenreich G. (eds.) Metal soaps and visual changes in a painting by René Magritte—, 1927. Cham: Springer; 2014. p. Publisher’s Note 197–203. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- 16. Defeyt C, Vandepitte F, Mazurek J, Herens E, Strivay D. Conservation lished maps and institutional afliations. of modern oil paintings. In: van den Berg K, Bonaduce I, Burnstock A,