8Th ANNUAL YARD CONTAINER CRANE SURVEY

Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Content 01

Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

8TH8th ANNUAL ANNUAL SHIP-TO-SHORE YARD8TH CONTAINER ANNUAL CRANECRANE SURVEYSURVEY SHIP-TO-SHORE CRANEGLOBALGLOBAL SURVEY DELIVERIES DELIVERIES 20192018 This surveyThis covers survey 2019covers global 2018 globaland regional and regional delivery delivery volumes volumes and and 2006-19 2005-18 globalglobal and and regional regional delivery delivery trends trends for ship-to-shore for Yard Container container Crane.cranes. Researched and authored exclusivelyGLOBAL for PEMA DELIVERIES by Brian Robinson. 2018 Researched and authored exclusively for PEMA by Brian Robinson.

This survey covers 2018 global and regional delivery volumes and 2005-18 PublishedPublished August May 2020 2019 global and regional delivery trends for ship-to-shore container cranes.

Researched and authored exclusively for PEMA by Brian Robinson.

Published May 2019

www.pema.org

www.pema.org 02 Content | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Content 03

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 04 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS 06 2. YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019 07 3. GLOBAL DELIVERY TRENDS 2005-2019 22 4. ABOUT THE AUTHOR 28

Tables 1.1 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 07 1.2 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 08 1.2.1 Global eRTG deliveries 2012 -2019 by geographic region 08 1.3 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 10 1.3.1 Global ASC deliveries 2013 – 2019 by geographic region 10 2. Consolidated results of 2019 yard crane deliveries 12 3.1 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 22 3.2 lobal yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 by region 22 3.3 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 24 3.4 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 24 3.5 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 26 3.6 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 26

Figures 1.1 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 07 1.2 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 08 1.3 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 09 1.4 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 09 1.5 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 10 1.6 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 11 3.1 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 22 3.2 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 by region 23 3.3 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 24 3.4 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 25 3.5 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 26 3.6 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 27 04 Introduction| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Introduction 05

INTRODUCTION

Based on original data gathered from port METHODOLOGY SURVEY DISTRIBUTION accuracy of the data provided. This document equipment manufacturers around the world, the The survey research was conducted in February The consolidated survey results will be released does not constitute professional advice, nor is it an objective of the annual survey is to determine until March 2020 and the results were collated in to PEMA members and to all contributors to the exhaustive summary of the information available market size and scope by equipment delivery March 2020 survey immediately upon publication. At a later on the subject matter to which it refers. volumes for yard container gantry cranes, including: date the report will be made available in the All known manufacturers of yard cranes were public domain. Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the • Rubber-tyred gantry cranes (RTGs) contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire information, but neither the author, PEMA nor • Electrified rubber-tyred gantry cranes (e-RTGs) giving details of their deliveries in 2019. They DISCLAIMER any member company is responsible for any loss, damage, costs or expenses incurred, whether • Rail-mounted gantry cranes (RMGs) were requested to separately identify RTGs, This survey is based on information provided or not in negligence, arising from reliance on or • Automated stacking cranes (ASCs) e-RTGs, RMGs and ASCs. Some manufacturers directly by the equipment manufacturers. Data interpretation of the data. may not have separately identified RMGs and have not been independently verified. PEMA and Prior to 2011 this information had been published ASCs and RTGs and eRTGs. The numbers shown in the author cannot accept responsibility for the in the trade press, but as a result of changes in this report reflect those reported by contributors. magazine publication this is no longer the case. Because PEMA is a trade association, some Information continues to be published in the specific rules apply with respect to reporting trade press for yard container cranes on order at a data on individual company activity. This report specific date in time for delivery in future months. follows much the same format as in past years However, there are no data readily available and as was previously published in the trade for precise delivery numbers during a given press, but without details on the supplying calendar year. manufacturer and the name of component suppliers. Following cessation of the earlier mentioned trade press report, crane manufacturers were The survey was conducted by Brian Robinson, an asked whether a survey of past annual delivery independent container and transport consultant. numbers was useful information for them and Mr. Robinson has been the author of the surveys there was a resoundingly positive response. published in the trade press for the past several years and he is able to use historical data to provide valuable trend information. PEMA is committed to promoting and supporting the global role of port equipment and technology and in order to fill the gap in industry information CONFIDENTIALITY commissioned the survey of 2011 through 2018 Mr. Robinson signed a confidentiality agreement deliveries and does so again this year. with PEMA stating that individual company data would not be released by him to any other party, For similar reasons, PEMA has also commissioned including any officer or member of PEMA, except a report on annual deliveries of ship-to-shore in fully consolidated and aggregated form. container cranes. These two surveys for 2019 together complement the well-established PEMA Furthermore, the release of any and all data Annual Global Survey on Mobile Port Equipment must comply with criteria established by outside Deliveries, covering reach stackers, lift trucks and counsel and all source data will be destroyed within terminal tractors. six months of the survey results being released.

www.pema.org 06 Executive Summary | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 07

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS 2. YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019

In 2019 there were 670 Yard Crane deliveries Manufacturers were asked to specifically iden- Twelve (12) manufacturers were contacted and • Liebherr compared with 636 in 2018. There were 526 RTG tify Automatic Stacking Cranes (ASCs). There asked for details of their 2019 deliveries. All of • Sumitomo Heavy Industry / Mitsubishi Heavy deliveries and 144 RMGs compared with 393 were a total 68 ASCs reported deliveries in 2019 these have supplied cranes over recent years. Industry RTG and 243 RMG in 2018. compared with 124 in 2018. Deliveries were • Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding to Europe, North America, Mid East and Africa The 12 manufacturers contacted were: • Sany Marine Heavy Industry (Morocco). The 34% increase in RTG deliveries compared • Mitsubishi Loginext (Merging of Unicarriers with 2018 occurred with increases in every • Baltkran and Nichiyu Mitsubishi) geographic region with the exception of China Manufacturers were again also asked to identify • Hyundai Samho • ZPMC and Australia Pacific. eRTGs. It may be that some did not, but of the • Kalmar 526 RTGs reported 53 cranes were identified as • Kocks Krane Note: - Paceco Espana withdrew from port Conversly RMG deliveries were down 40% from eRTGs, • Konecranes crane manufacturing in 2018. 243 in 2018 to 144 in 2019. The biggest decline • Kuenz - Terex merged with Konecranes in 2017 occuring in Other Asia (which for the purposes Important note:- It is possible that the number of this report is Asia with the exception of China) of ASCs and eRTGs is understated because some where 5 RMGs were delivered in 2019 compared manufacturers did not identify ASCs in their RMG TABLE 1.1 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION with 79 in 2018 numbers or eRTGs in the RTG totals. China 111 17% Note: ASCs are included in RMGs in the numbers Other Asia 165 25% above. Europe 95 14% Nth America 108 16% Latin America 21 3% Mid. East 63 9% Africa 104 16% Australasia 3 0% Total 670 100%

FIGURE 1.1 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

21 3 63 165

China Other Asia 95 Europe Nth America Latin America Mid East 111 Africa Australia/Pacific

104

108

www.pema.org 08 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 09

FIGURE 1.2: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION FIGURE 1.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

21 3 31 160

China Other Asia 72 Europe Nth America Latin America Mid East Africa Australia/Pacific 74 83

82 FIGURE 1.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

TABLE 1.2 GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

China 83 16% Other Asia 160 30% Europe 72 14% Nth America 82 16% Latin America 21 4% Mid. East 31 6% Africa 74 14% Australasia 3 0% Total 526 100%

TABLE 1.2.1 GLOBAL eRTG DELIVERIES 2012 -2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

Region 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 China 41 10 2 8 4 4 6 0 Other Asia 18 22 34 48 42 34 22 12 Europe 7 27 61 63 31 32 24 19 Nth America 12 14 3 16 Latin America 30 0 24 9 30 6 2 0 Mid East 2 0 4 1 0 2 1 Africa 4 10 5 Global 98 59 125 145 131 76 59 53

Note : the eRTG delivery numbers shown in table 1.2.1 are included the RTG delivery numbers shown in Table 1.2 Some manufacturers did not specifically identify eRTGs it is therefore probable that the above eRTG numbers are understated

www.pema.org 10 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 11

TABLE 1.3: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION FIGURE 1.6: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, INCLUDING ASCS

China 28 19% Other Asia 5 3% Europe 23 16% Nth America 26 18% Latin America 0 0% Mid. East 32 22% Africa 30 21% Australasia 0 0% Total 144 100%

TABLE 1.3.1: GLOBAL ASC DELIVERIES 2013-2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

Region 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 China 28 30 0 Other Asia 10 72 18 0 Europe 84 63 30 30 15 14 6 Nth. America 10 30 17 2 2 38 22 Mid. East 12 8 0 10 35 24 16 Africa 24 Australasia 12 20 6 22 0 Global 118 121 63 64 152 124 68

Note : The ASC delivery numbers shown in table 1.3.1 are included in the total RMG number in Table 1.3

FIGURE 1.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, INCLUDING ASCS

32 23 China Other Asia Europe Nth America Mid East 26 Africa 30

www.pema.org 12 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 13

YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

RTG/eRTG/RMG/ASC cranes Speeds (m/min) Spreader delivered in 2019 RTG/eRTG Number of Lift Lift Height Span Country Quantity Delivered is defined as ex-factory RMG/ASC wheels (if RTG) Capacity m m Trolley Hoist Gantry Single/twin to DPW Djazair Algeria 5 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 26/52 135 Single Exolgán S.A. Container Term. Argentina 4 RTG 8 40 1o5 6+1 Single Buenos Aires Pacific National, Cairns Term. Australia 2 RTG 8 41 1o3 4+1 Single Pacific National, Mackay Term. Australia 1 RTG 8 41 1o3 4+1 Single Container Terminal Enns Austria/Enns 1 RMG 41 t 20 m 42,70 m 100 m/min 36 m/min 120 m/min Single Chittagong Port Authority Bangladesh 6 RTG 40T 20.75 23.5 70 20/46 130 BEST Barcelona 6 ASC 40.6 18.1 29.1 60 45/90 270 Single Brest Belarus 1 RTG 16 36t 5+1 26.5 70 23/46 30/135 Single BTP Brazil 4 RTG 41T 21 25.93 70 22/50 135 GTC Vanterm Canada 4 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 76 31/62 135 Single GTC Deltaport Canada 6 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 76 31/62 135 Single Termont Canada 3 RTG 16 60 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single Montreal Gateway Terminal Canada 10 ERTG 16 40.6 18.1 23.1 70 28/57 135 Single Partnership Yidu Port Co.,Ltd. China 3 RMG 35/45 15.3 35 20/40 63 Single Ganzhou Port China 1 RMG 40.5 12.5 35 15/30 50/70 Single Hefei Paihe China 8 RMG 40.5 15.3 40 30/50 80 Single Hefei Port Co.,Ltd. China 2 RMG 24 40.5 15.8 40/30 15 76 Single Jinzhou Port, China China 1 RMG 35 15.7 50 22/35 70 Single Jintang Port Co.,Ltd. China 2 RMG 40.5 12.5 40 40/80 120 Single Wuhan Northern Rail Way Station China 1 RTG 40.5 12.5 35 20/40 100/120 Single Gansu Guotong Logist Co., Ltd China 1 RTG 24 40.5 12.5 32 20/40 80/110 Single Qingzhou Port Co., Ltd. China 4 RTG 41 18.1 23.47 25/52 70 Single Zhuhai International Container China 12 RTG 16 40 18.1 23.47 20/45 70 Single Terminal Fujian Jiangyin China 5 RTG 65LT 70 30.48 52 90/180 240 Shanghai Port YiDong Term China 3 RTG 40T 18.2 23.47 70 27/54 135 Ningbo Daxie Container Terminal China 6 RTG 40.6T 18.24 23.47 70 23/52 90 Co., Ltd. China Yingkou Port China 6 RTG 40.5T 23.47 70 23/52 90 Ningbo Zhoushan China 24 RTG 40.6T 18.24 23.47 70 23/52 130

www.pema.org 14 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 15

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

Zhanjiang Port China 3 RTG 41T 18.24 23.47 70 25/54 90 Tianjin Port China 5 RTG 61T 15.24 23.47 70 18/52 90 Dongguan Humen Interenational China 3 RTG 40.5T 18 23.47 70 25/50 130 Termianl Ningbo Beilun China 9 RTG 40.6T 18.2 23.47 70 23/55 130 Guangzhou Contanier Terminal China 1 RTG 41T 18.1 23.47 70 25/55 100 Sout+A107:K115 Miami China 8 RMG 65T 33 120 40/80 150 Port of Guangzhou (Nansha)., China 3 RMG 7T 21.1 31 91 40/60 47 China Czech Republic/ Metrans A.S. 1 RMG 37 t 12,6 m 35,80 m 100 m/min 20 m/min 100 m/min Single Prague SGTD Djibouti 2 RTG 41T 18.27 23.47 70 25/50 135 SGTD Djibouti 8 RTG 41T 18.27 23.47 70 25/50 135 SGTD Djibouti 2 RMG 41T 10.1 20.8 120 30/60 90 DPW Posorja Ecuador 3 RTG 41T 18.2 26.4 70 25/50 135 Sokhna Egypt 8 RTG 16 41 18.2 23.47 70 28/56 135 Single DCHC Egypt 6 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 20/46 130 PSCCHC Egypt 6 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 27.5/55 120 DCHC Egypt 3 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 26/52 120 Sokhna,DPW Egypt 2 RMG 41T 31.2 120 35/70 120 Compagnie Nationale du Rhône France/lyon 1 RMG 41 t 22,50 m 28 m 120 m/min 60 m/min 90 m/min Single Tema,Ghana Ghana 20 RTG 41T 18.1 25.93 70 22/50 135 Terminal de Contenedores Quetzal Guatemala 2 RTG 16 41 18.1 26.45 70 28/56 130 Single Metrans Koenener Raktarozo Es Hungary 1 RMG 37 t 12,60 m 40 m 100 m/min 40 m/min 100 m/min Single Atrakodo KFT Budapest Adani Mundra CT4 India 5 RTG 41T 18.2 26.5 70 25/50 135 Adani Hazira India 2 RTG 41T 18.2 26.5 70 25/50 135 Adani Mundra T2 India 3 RMG 65T 10.2 34 150 35/75 150 PT Graha Segara Indonesia 1 RTG 8 41 1o6 6+1 Single RAPP, Futong Port Indonesia 1 RTG 8 41 1o5 6+1 Single Belawan Container Terminal Phase Indonesia 12 ARTG/eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single 2 Belawan Container Terminal Indonesia 5 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 30/60 130 Single PT. Pelayaran Tempuran Emas Tbk. Indonesia 6 RTG 8 40.6 21 23.47 70 23 90 Single New Priok Container Terminal Indonesia 4 RTG 41t 21.2 23.47 70 30/60 120 DSG, Dublin Ireland 1 RTG 16 40.6 21 25.95 70 28/56 130 Single Conterm Ashdod Israel 1 eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 26/52 130 Single

www.pema.org 16 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 17

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

Fridenson Logistigs Services Israel 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 70 26/52 130 Single VTE (Voltri Terminal Europa S.p.A.) Italy/Genova 2 RMG 45 t 10,50 m 27 m 120 m/min 40 m/min 120 m/min Single Kamagumi Yokohama Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single Tomakomai Port Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single Toyo Futo (Kawasaki) Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single Daito Corporation Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single Daito Corporation Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single APM Terminals Japan. Co., Ltd. Japan 8 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single Shosen Koun Co., Ltd. Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single Daito Corporation Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single MITSUI-SOKO CO.Ltd. Japan 7 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single NIPPON-EXPRESS CO.Ltd. Japan 4 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single Utoc Corporation Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.2 70 23 90 Single Karaganda Kazakhstan 1 RMG 50t 3+1 32 36 8 33 Single CRBC Kenya 2 RMG 40T 30 80 20/40 100 Klaipeda Container Terminal Lithuania 4 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single Klaipedos Smelte Lithuania 10 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single Klaipeda Container Terminal Lithuania 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single Madagascar Interntl. Cont. Term Madagascar 3 RTG 41T 18.2 23.47 70 25/50 130 Bintulu Port Malaysia 2 RTG 8 40 1-over-6 6+1 72 23/52 130 Single Penang Port Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia 3 RTG 8 40 21 23.47 70 23 90 Single Johor Port Berhad Malaysia 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single Penang Port Malaysia 2 RMG 40T 40 100 35/70 60 Malta Freeport Terminal Malta 15 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 130 Single CMSA,ICTSI Mexico 5 RTG 41T 20.65 23.47 70 25/50 90 ATP Mexico 3 RTG 41T 18.3 23.47 70 30/60 135 Eurogate Tanger S.A. Morocco 2 RTG 8 50 1o5 6+1 Single APM Terminals MedPort Tangier Morocco/Taniger 24 ASC 41 t 17,90 m 33,70 m 72 m/min 84 m/min 210 m/min Single Ministry of Transport and Comu- Mozambique 6 RTG 8 41 18 23.5 70 23 90 Single nications RST Netherlands 2 RMG 41t 15 54 180 80 120 Single Netherlands/ CTVrede Steinweg BV 1 RMG 41 t 18 m 48 m 100 m/min 60 m/min 100 m/min Single Zaandam OICT, HPH Oman 8 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 135 SAPT, Pakistan,HPH Pakistan 5 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 24/55 90

www.pema.org 18 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 19

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

SAPT, HPH Pakistan 11 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 135 Internatinal Container Terminal Philippines 16 RTG 8 40.6 18.2 23.47 70 23 90 Single Services Inc. DCT Poland 3 RMG 41t 9.55 32 120 56 150 Single Sibur Russia 1 RMG 42t 2+1 35 48 12 37 Single Kharovsk Russia 1 RMG 32t 2+1 32 20 8 30 Single Kaliningrad Russia 1 RMG 45t 3+1 25 40 24 60 Single Nizhnekamsk Russia 1 RMG 45t 3+1 25 40 24 60 Single King Abdullah Port Saudi Arabia 20 RTG 16 40.6 21 26.45 70 28/56 130 Single Koper Slovenia 5 eRTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 70 31/62 135 Single SAGT Sri Lanka 6 RTG 41T 20.75 22.7 70 22/50 135 CICT Sri Lanka 6 RTG 41T 21.2 23.47 70 23/52 90 Hutchison Laemchabang Terminal Thailand 10 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 134 Limited Lomé Container Terminal Togo 5 eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 30/60 135 Single Yilport Holding Inc. Turkey 4 RTG 8 41 21 26.5 70 26 90 Single Kumport Turkey 8 RTG 40T 21.22 26.18 70 26/52 130 Khalifa Port Abu Dhabi U.A.E. 12 RMG 41T 18.1 34 90 45/90 240 Khalifa Port Abu Dhabi U.A.E. 4 RMG 9T 4.5 34 90 45/90 120 Abu Dhabi Terminals U.A.E. 16 ASC 40.6 21 29 60 45/90 240 Single Felixstowe Dock and Railway UK 8 RTG 41T 21.818 27.1 70 30/60 135 Company Zero Emission Belfast Container Terminal UK 8 16 40 1o5 9+1 Single AutoRTG ABP, Immingham UK 6 Zero Emission RTG 16 41 1o6 7+1 Single Norfolk Southern, Landers Term. USA 2 RTG 8 31 1o4 6+1 Single Chicago Norfolk Southern, Rossville Term. USA 2 RTG 8 31 1o4 6+1 Single Memphis CSX Intermodal, Syracuse Term. USA 2 RTG 16 45 1o5 7+1 Single New York South Florida Container Term. USA 6 Zero Emission RTG 16 41 1o5 6+1 Single Miami Massport USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single Georgia Ports Authority USA 10 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 6+1 82 31/61 137 Single South Carolina Port Authority USA 2 RTG 16 50 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single South Carolina Port Authority USA 24 RTG 16 50 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single Kansas City Southem Rail (KCSM) USA 2 RTG 16 45 1-over-3 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single Massport USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

www.pema.org 20 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 21

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

Georgia Ports Authority USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single Global Container Terminal (GCT) USA 2 RMG 50.8 12.2 47.5 150 40/80 120 Twin Bayonne Virginia International Terminals Inc USA 2 RMG 40.6 12.2 25.3 150 45/90 180 Single (VIG) Norfolk International Terminal USA 22 ASC 40.6 18.1 29 72 45/90 300 Single (NIT) CSX Intermodal Terminals USA 2 RTG 16 40.6 12.3 22.9 70 28/56 130 Single CSX Intermodal Terminals USA 1 RTG 8 40.6 12 21.64 50 18/50 130 Single Haiphong International Container Vietnam 24 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 26 90 Single Terminal TCIT Vietnam 2 RTG 41T 23.47 70 23/54 130 670

Notes: 1 | ASC = Automated stacking crane RMG = rail mounted gantry crane RTG = rubber tyred gantry crane eRTG = electrified rubber tyred gantry crane 2 | Some manufacturers express crane height and span in terms of number of containers rather than as an absolute measurement. There maybe a variance between suppliers, but the following conversion may be useful.

Equivalent in one over x Lift height (m) containers 12.3 1 over 3 (3+1) 15.3 1 over 4 (4+1) 18.1 1 over 5 (5+1) 21.0 1 over 6 (6+1) Gantry span (m) Equivalent in rows + truck lane 20.8 5+1 23.6 6+1 26.5 7+1

www.pema.org 22 Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019 23

3. GLOBAL DELIVERY TRENDS 2005-2019 FIGURE 3.2: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019 BY REGION

TABLE 3.1: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Quantity 711 1039 794 877 856 529 455 690 728 790 678 704 630 636 670

FIGURE 3.1: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019

TABLE 3.2 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019 BY REGION

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 China 270 347 275 257 215 87 82 135 68 89 142 170 117 150 111 Other Asia 184 227 124 194 274 71 153 212 158 263 197 149 253 214 165 Europe 64 174 130 189 135 140 62 85 186 179 145 126 72 91 95 North Am. 91 96 93 38 16 43 7 35 68 44 48 67 36 75 108 Latin Am. 23 94 89 65 48 47 81 140 116 101 38 62 55 19 21 Mid East 67 76 53 68 91 49 44 51 53 42 73 34 72 45 63 Africa 12 19 27 66 77 91 22 32 67 52 25 74 21 38 104 Australasia 0 6 3 0 0 1 4 0 12 20 10 22 4 4 3 Global 711 1039 794 877 856 529 455 690 728 790 678 704 630 636 670

www.pema.org 24 Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019 25

TABLE 3.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 FIGURE 3.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Quantity 670 714 671 422 337 610 530 507 490 503 416 393 526

FIGURE 3.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

TABLE 3.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 China 242 225 151 59 65 126 65 71 133 111 55 108 83 Other Asia 122 152 211 67 111 203 153 173 127 146 174 135 160 Europe 89 128 104 82 35 37 75 80 94 67 48 57 72 North Am. 63 30 11 38 7 28 20 10 23 48 26 26 82 Latin Am. 89 65 48 47 81 140 116 91 38 52 51 19 21 Mid East 35 48 71 37 12 48 38 32 40 9 37 13 31 Africa 27 66 75 91 22 28 63 50 25 70 21 31 74 Australasia 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 10 0 4 4 3 Global 670 714 671 422 337 610 530 507 490 503 416 393 526

www.pema.org 26 Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019 27

TABLE 3.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 FIGURE 3.6: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Quantity 124 163 185 107 118 80 198 283 188 201 214 243 144

FIGURE 3.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

TABLE 3.6 GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 China 33 32 64 28 17 9 3 18 9 59 62 42 28 Other Asia 2 42 63 4 42 9 5 90 70 3 79 79 5 Europe 41 61 31 58 27 48 111 99 51 59 24 34 23 North Am. 30 8 5 5 0 7 48 34 25 19 10 49 26 Latin Am. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 4 0 0 Mid East 18 20 20 12 32 3 15 10 33 25 35 32 32 Africa 0 0 2 0 0 4 4 2 0 4 0 7 30 Australasia 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 20 0 22 0 0 0 Global 124 163 185 107 118 80 198 283 188 201 214 243 144

www.pema.org 28 About the Author | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Contact 29

5. ABOUT THE AUTHOR PEMA – PORT EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

For the past 19 years, Brian Robinson has worked Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building, as a freelance journalist and transport industry Chaussée de la Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170 Brussels, Belgium consultant. His journalistic and consulting assign- President & Finance Office: Paradiso-TI, CH-6900, Switzerland ments have covered all aspects of the transport, Secretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) shipping and the ports and terminals industry, 15-17 St. Cross St. London EC1N 8UW, United Kingdom with special emphasis on terminal handling equipment. Secretariat Contacts: Petar Karaivanov Mr. Robinson has conducted detailed annual Head of Administration industry surveys of ship to shore (STS) and RTG/ Mobile: +44 7766 228 958 RMG yard cranes, which have been published in Email: [email protected] the trade press and become industry benchmarks. Over recent years he has conducted similar surveys on behalf of PEMA along with surveys of annual delivery of mobile handling equipment.

For most of his career he was engaged in various senior management positions in the container leasing sector in Europe and USA, covering both field and HQ positions. Earlier he worked in the rail, road and shipping industries. Mr. Robinson was educated at London School of Economics and Anglian Management School.

www.pema.org pema.org – August 2020

PEMA – Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building, Chaussée de la Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170 - April 2019 www.pema.org Brussels, Belgium President & Finance Office: Paradiso-TI, CH-6900, Switzerland Secretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) 15-17 St. Cross St. London EC1N 8UW, United Kingdom

Secretariat Contacts: Petar Karaivanov Head of Administration Mobile: +44 7766 228 958 Email: [email protected]