DOCSLIB.ORG

A History of the Neuron

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A History of the Neuron A Brief History of the Discovery of the Neuron Cell Theory 1838 – Matthias Schleiden and Theodore Schwann proposed the cell was the basic functional unit of all living things BUT it was widely believed this did not apply to the nervous system Development of the Achromatic Lens 1820’s Johannes Purkinje 1832 – Purkinje began examining thin sections of nervous tissue First neurons to be identified: Purkinje cells found in the cerebellum Otto Friedrich Carl Dieters 1863 - Further improvements in microscopy enabled Dieters to produce the most accurate description yet of a nerve cell Referred to the axon as the “axis cylinder” and the dendrites as “protoplasmic processes” The Great Debate Debate among researchers raged on about the organization of the nervous system Reticularists believed the nervous system consisted of a large network of tissue or (anastomoses) formed by the fused processes of nerve cells Neuronists argued that the nervous system consisted of distinct cells Joseph von Gerlach A reticularist 1871 - Used gold chloride or carmine to stain nerve tissue Concluded: “the finest divisions of the protoplasmic processes ultimately take part in the formation of the fine nerve fibre network which I consider to be an essential constituent of the gray matter of the spinal cord.” Camillo Golgi 1873 - Developed a new staining technique which involves hardening of tissue in potassium bichromate and ammonia, followed by immersion in silver nitrate Still thought his observations confirmed the “nerve network” organization of the nervous system Wilhelm His, Sr. 1880’s studied embryological development of the central nervous system “I consider as a definitive principle the theorem that every nerve fiber originates as the outgrowth of a single cell.” His micrograph of the neuroblastic cells with processes growing toward the surface (human embryo at four weeks) Santiago Ramon Cajal 1887 used Gogi’s method of staining nervous tissue with the addition of immersing the tissues in fixative and silver nitrate a second time Observation of the basket cells of the cerebellar cortex: “The special character of these cells is the striking arrangement of their nerve filament (axon), which arises from the cell body but also very often from any thick, protoplasmic expansion (dendrite).” The Big Breakthrough! The twentieth century invention of the electron microscope allowed researchers to examine nervous tissue in greater detail. Electron micrograph (right) shows clusters of vesicles docked at the presynaptic membrane. Scanning electron micrograph (below) shows vesicles in the process of fusing with the presynaptic membrane The Neuron Doctrine The neuron is the fundamental structural and functional unit of the nervous system. Neurons are discrete cells which are not continuous with other cells. The neuron is composed of 3 parts – the dendrites, axon and cell body. Information flows along the neuron in one direction (from the dendrites to the axon, via the cell body). Current Vocabulary The term “neuron” was introduced in 1891 by Heinrich Wilhelm Gottfried von Waldeyer-Hartz (A) “Axis cylinder” was named “axon” by Rudolph Albert von Kolliker (B) “Protoplasmic processes” were called “dendrites” by Wilhelm His Sr. (C) And finally, “synapse” was coined by Sir Charles Sherrington in 1897 (D) A B C D .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crayfish Escape Behavior and Central Synapses
    Crayfish Escape Behavior and Central Synapses. III. Electrical Junctions and Dendrite Spikes in Fast Flexor Motoneurons ROBERT S. ZUCKER Department of Biological Sciences and Program in the Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 THE LATERAL giant fiber is the decision fiber and fast flexor motoneurons are located in for a behavioral response in crayfish in- the dorsal neuropil of each abdominal gan- volving rapid tail flexion in response to glion. Dye injections and anatomical recon- abdominal tactile stimulation (27). Each structions of ‘identified motoneurons reveal lateral giant impulse is followed by a rapid that only those motoneurons which have tail flexion or tail flip, and when the giant dentritic branches in contact with a giant fiber does not fire in response to such stim- fiber are activated by that giant fiber (12, uli, the movement does not occur. 21). All of tl ie fast flexor motoneurons are The afferent limb of the reflex exciting excited by the ipsilateral giant; all but F4, the lateral giant has been described (28), F5 and F7 are also excited by the contra- and the habituation of the behavior has latkral giant (21 a). been explained in terms of the properties The excitation of these motoneurons, of this part of the neural circuit (29). seen as depolarizing potentials in their The properties of the neuromuscular somata, does not always reach threshold for junctions between the fast flexor motoneu- generating a spike which propagates out the rons and the phasic flexor muscles have also axon to the periphery (14). Indeed, only t,he been described (13).
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Adult Human Brain Slice Cultures As a Model System to Study
    TOOLS AND RESOURCES Long-term adult human brain slice cultures as a model system to study human CNS circuitry and disease Niklas Schwarz1, Betu¨ l Uysal1, Marc Welzer2,3, Jacqueline C Bahr1, Nikolas Layer1, Heidi Lo¨ ffler1, Kornelijus Stanaitis1, Harshad PA1, Yvonne G Weber1,4, Ulrike BS Hedrich1, Ju¨ rgen B Honegger4, Angelos Skodras2,3, Albert J Becker5, Thomas V Wuttke1,4†*, Henner Koch1†* 1Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tu¨ bingen, Tu¨ bingen, Germany; 2Department of Cellular Neurology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tu¨ bingen, Tu¨ bingen, Germany; 3German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tu¨ bingen, Germany; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tu¨ bingen, Tu¨ bingen, Germany; 5Department of Neuropathology, Section for Translational Epilepsy Research, University Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany Abstract Most of our knowledge on human CNS circuitry and related disorders originates from model organisms. How well such data translate to the human CNS remains largely to be determined. Human brain slice cultures derived from neurosurgical resections may offer novel avenues to approach this translational gap. We now demonstrate robust preservation of the complex neuronal cytoarchitecture and electrophysiological properties of human pyramidal neurons *For correspondence: in long-term brain slice cultures. Further experiments delineate the optimal conditions for efficient [email protected] viral transduction of cultures, enabling ‘high throughput’ fluorescence-mediated 3D reconstruction tuebingen.de (TVW); of genetically targeted neurons at comparable quality to state-of-the-art biocytin fillings, and [email protected] demonstrate feasibility of long term live cell imaging of human cells in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • Nervous Tissue
    Nervous Tissue • Controls and integrates all body activities within limits that maintain life • Three basic functions – sensing changes with sensory receptors • fullness of stomach or sun on your face – interpreting and remembering those changes – reacting to those changes with effectors • muscular contractions • glandular secretions Major Structures of the Nervous System • Brain, cranial nerves, spinal cord, spinal nerves, ganglia, enteric plexuses and sensory receptors Organization of the Nervous System • CNS is brain and spinal cord • PNS is everything else Nervous System Divisions • Central nervous system (CNS) – consists of the brain and spinal cord • Peripheral nervous system (PNS) – consists of cranial and spinal nerves that contain both sensory and motor fibers – connects CNS to muscles, glands & all sensory receptors Subdivisions of the PNS • Somatic (voluntary) nervous system (SNS) – neurons from cutaneous and special sensory receptors to the CNS – motor neurons to skeletal muscle tissue • Autonomic (involuntary) nervous systems – sensory neurons from visceral organs to CNS – motor neurons to smooth & cardiac muscle and glands • sympathetic division (speeds up heart rate) • parasympathetic division (slow down heart rate) • Enteric nervous system (ENS) – involuntary sensory & motor neurons control GI tract – neurons function independently of ANS & CNS Neurons • Functional unit of nervous system • Have capacity to produce action potentials – electrical excitability • Cell body – single nucleus with prominent nucleolus – Nissl
    [Show full text]
  • Oligodendrocytes in Development, Myelin Generation and Beyond
    cells Review Oligodendrocytes in Development, Myelin Generation and Beyond Sarah Kuhn y, Laura Gritti y, Daniel Crooks and Yvonne Dombrowski * Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (D.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +0044-28-9097-6127 These authors contributed equally. y Received: 15 October 2019; Accepted: 7 November 2019; Published: 12 November 2019 Abstract: Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells of the central nervous system (CNS) that are generated from oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC). OPC are distributed throughout the CNS and represent a pool of migratory and proliferative adult progenitor cells that can differentiate into oligodendrocytes. The central function of oligodendrocytes is to generate myelin, which is an extended membrane from the cell that wraps tightly around axons. Due to this energy consuming process and the associated high metabolic turnover oligodendrocytes are vulnerable to cytotoxic and excitotoxic factors. Oligodendrocyte pathology is therefore evident in a range of disorders including multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease. Deceased oligodendrocytes can be replenished from the adult OPC pool and lost myelin can be regenerated during remyelination, which can prevent axonal degeneration and can restore function. Cell population studies have recently identified novel immunomodulatory functions of oligodendrocytes, the implications of which, e.g., for diseases with primary oligodendrocyte pathology, are not yet clear. Here, we review the journey of oligodendrocytes from the embryonic stage to their role in homeostasis and their fate in disease. We will also discuss the most common models used to study oligodendrocytes and describe newly discovered functions of oligodendrocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Build a Neuron
    Build a Neuron Objectives: 1. To understand what a neuron is and what it does 2. To understand the anatomy of a neuron in relation to function This activity is great for ALL ages-even college students!! Materials: pipe cleaners (2 full size, 1 cut into 3 for each student) pony beads (6/student Introduction: Little kids: ask them where their brain is (I point to my head and torso areas till they ​ shake their head yes) Talk about legos being the building blocks for a tower and relate that to neurons being the building blocks for your brain and that neurons send messages to other parts of your brain and to and from all your body parts. Give examples: touch from body to brain, movement from brain to body. Neurons are the building blocks of the brain that send and receive messages. Neurons come in all different shapes. Experiment: 1. First build soma by twisting a pipe cleaner into a circle 2. Then put a 2nd pipe cleaner through the circle and bend it over and twist the two strands together to make it look like a lollipop (axon) 3. take 3 shorter pipe cleaners attach to cell body to make dendrites 4. add 6 beads on the axon making sure there is space between beads for the electricity to “jump” between them to send the signal super fast. (myelin sheath) 5. Twist the end of the axon to make it look like 2 feet for the axon terminal. 6. Make a brain by having all of the neurons “talk” to each other (have each student hold their neuron because they’ll just throw them on a table for you to do it.) messages come in through the dendrites and if its a strong enough electrical change, then the cell body sends the Build a Neuron message down it’s axon where a neurotransmitter is released.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurons – Is a Basic Cell of the Nervous System. • Neurons Carry Nerve Messages, Or Impulses, from One Part of the Body to Another
    Nervous System Nerves and Nerve Cells: Neurons – is a basic cell of the nervous system. • Neurons carry nerve messages, or impulses, from one part of the body to another. Structure of a Nerve Cell: A neuron has three basic parts: 1. Body – controls the cell’s growth 2. Axon – is a long thin fiber that carries impulses away from the cell body Myelin – is a fatty material that insulates the axon and increases the speed at which an impulse travels 3. Dendrites – are short, branching fibers that carry nerve impulses toward the cell body. • A nerve impulse begins when the dendrites are stimulated. The impulse travels along the dendrites to the cell body, and then away from the cell body on the axon. • The impulse must cross a synapse to a muscle or another neuron. Synapse – is the space between an axon and the structure with which the neuron communicates. Types of Nerve Cells: Sensory Neurons – pick up information about your external and internal environment from your sense organs and your body Motor Neurons – sends impulses to your muscles and glands, causing them to react Interneurons – are located only in the brain and spinal cord, pass impulses from one neuron to another The Central Nervous System: • The nervous system consists of two parts. Your brain and spinal cord make up one part, which is called the central nervous system. 1 • The peripheral nervous system, which is the other part, is made up of all the nerves that connect the brain and spinal cord to other parts of the body. The Brain: Brain ± a moist, spongy organ weighing about three pounds is made up of billions of neurons that control almost everything you do and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Narrowing of Dendrite Branches Across Nodes Follows a Well-Defined Scaling Law
    The narrowing of dendrite branches across nodes follows a well-defined scaling law Maijia Liaoa, Xin Liangb, and Jonathon Howarda,1 aDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; and bTsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China Edited by Yuh Nung Jan, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, and approved May 17, 2021 (received for review October 28, 2020) The systematic variation of diameters in branched networks has minimized. Da Vinci’s law has been reformulated as the “pipe tantalized biologists since the discovery of da Vinci’s rule for trees. model” for plants, in which a fixed cross-section of stems and Da Vinci’s rule can be formulated as a power law with exponent branches is required to support each unit amount of leaves (13). two: The square of the mother branch’s diameter is equal to the Experimental support for scaling laws, however, is scarce because sum of the squares of those of the daughters. Power laws, with of the difficulties of imaging entire branched networks and because different exponents, have been proposed for branching in circula- intrinsic anatomical variability may obscure precise laws (14). Thus, tory systems (Murray’s law with exponent 3) and in neurons (Rall’s it is an open question whether scaling laws such as Eq. 1 apply in law with exponent 3/2). The laws have been derived theoretically, biological systems. based on optimality arguments, but, for the most part, have not To quantitatively test diameter-scaling laws in neurons, it is been tested rigorously.
    [Show full text]
  • Cajal's Law of Dynamic Polarization: Mechanism and Design
    philosophies Article Cajal’s Law of Dynamic Polarization: Mechanism and Design Sergio Daniel Barberis ID Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Instituto de Filosofía “Dr. Alejandro Korn”, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, PO 1406, Argentina; sbarberis@filo.uba.ar Received: 8 February 2018; Accepted: 11 April 2018; Published: 16 April 2018 Abstract: Santiago Ramón y Cajal, the primary architect of the neuron doctrine and the law of dynamic polarization, is considered to be the founder of modern neuroscience. At the same time, many philosophers, historians, and neuroscientists agree that modern neuroscience embodies a mechanistic perspective on the explanation of the nervous system. In this paper, I review the extant mechanistic interpretation of Cajal’s contribution to modern neuroscience. Then, I argue that the extant mechanistic interpretation fails to capture the explanatory import of Cajal’s law of dynamic polarization. My claim is that the definitive formulation of Cajal’s law of dynamic polarization, despite its mechanistic inaccuracies, embodies a non-mechanistic pattern of reasoning (i.e., design explanation) that is an integral component of modern neuroscience. Keywords: Cajal; law of dynamic polarization; mechanism; utility; design 1. Introduction The Spanish microanatomist and Nobel laureate Santiago Ramón y Cajal (1852–1934), the primary architect of the neuron doctrine and the law of dynamic polarization, is considered to be the founder of modern neuroscience [1,2]. According to the neuron doctrine, the nerve cell is the anatomical, physiological, and developmental unit of the nervous system [3,4]. To a first approximation, the law of dynamic polarization states that nerve impulses are exactly polarized in the neuron; in functional terms, the dendrites and the cell body work as a reception device, the axon works as a conduction device, and the terminal arborizations of the axon work as an application device.
    [Show full text]
  • The Churchlands' Neuron Doctrine: Both Cognitive and Reductionist
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231998559 The Churchlands' neuron doctrine: Both cognitive and reductionist Article in Behavioral and Brain Sciences · October 1999 DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99462193 CITATIONS READS 2 20 1 author: John Sutton Macquarie University 139 PUBLICATIONS 1,356 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by John Sutton on 06 August 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. The Churchlands’ neuron doctrine: both cognitive and reductionist John Sutton Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (1999), 850-1. [email protected] http://johnsutton.net/ Commentary on Gold & Stoljar, ‘A Neuron Doctrine in the Philosophy of Neuroscience’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (1999), 809-869: full paper and commentaries online at: http://www.stanford.edu/~paulsko/papers/GSND.pdf Abstract: According to Gold and Stoljar, one cannot both consistently be reductionist about psychoneural relations and invoke concepts developed in the psychological sciences. I deny the utility of their distinction between biological and cognitive neuroscience, suggesting that they construe biological neuroscience too rigidly and cognitive neuroscience too liberally. Then I reject their characterization of reductionism: reductions need not go down past neurobiology straight to physics, and cases of partial, local reduction are not neatly distinguishable from cases of mere implementation. Modifying the argument from unification-as-reduction, I defend a position weaker than the radical, but stronger than the trivial neuron doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myelin-Forming Cells of the Nervous System (Oligodendrocytes and Schwann Cells)
    The Myelin-Forming Cells of the Nervous System (oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells) Oligodendrocyte Schwann Cell Oligodendrocyte function Saltatory (jumping) nerve conduction Oligodendroglia PMD PMD Saltatory (jumping) nerve conduction Investigating the Myelinogenic Potential of Individual Oligodendrocytes In Vivo Sparse Labeling of Oligodendrocytes CNPase-GFP Variegated expression under the MBP-enhancer Cerebral Cortex Corpus Callosum Cerebral Cortex Corpus Callosum Cerebral Cortex Caudate Putamen Corpus Callosum Cerebral Cortex Caudate Putamen Corpus Callosum Corpus Callosum Cerebral Cortex Caudate Putamen Corpus Callosum Ant Commissure Corpus Callosum Cerebral Cortex Caudate Putamen Piriform Cortex Corpus Callosum Ant Commissure Characterization of Oligodendrocyte Morphology Cerebral Cortex Corpus Callosum Caudate Putamen Cerebellum Brain Stem Spinal Cord Oligodendrocytes in disease: Cerebral Palsy ! CP major cause of chronic neurological morbidity and mortality in children ! CP incidence now about 3/1000 live births compared to 1/1000 in 1980 when we started intervening for ELBW ! Of all ELBW {gestation 6 mo, Wt. 0.5kg} , 10-15% develop CP ! Prematurely born children prone to white matter injury {WMI}, principle reason for the increase in incidence of CP ! ! 12 Cerebral Palsy Spectrum of white matter injury ! ! Macro Cystic Micro Cystic Gliotic Khwaja and Volpe 2009 13 Rationale for Repair/Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis Oligodendrocyte specification oligodendrocytes specified from the pMN after MNs - a ventral source of oligodendrocytes
    [Show full text]
  • NEURAL CONNECTIONS: Some You Use, Some You Lose
    NEURAL CONNECTIONS: Some You Use, Some You Lose by JOHN T. BRUER SOURCE: Phi Delta Kappan 81 no4 264-77 D 1999 . The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited JOHN T. BRUER is president of the James S. McDonnell Foundation, St. Louis. This article is adapted from his new book, The Myth of the First Three Years (Free Press, 1999), and is reprinted by arrangement with The Free Press, a division of Simon Schuster Inc. ©1999, John T. Bruer . OVER 20 YEARS AGO, neuroscientists discovered that humans and other animals experience a rapid increase in brain connectivity -- an exuberant burst of synapse formation -- early in development. They have studied this process most carefully in the brain's outer layer, or cortex, which is essentially our gray matter. In these studies, neuroscientists have documented that over our life spans the number of synapses per unit area or unit volume of cortical tissue changes, as does the number of synapses per neuron. Neuroscientists refer to the number of synapses per unit of cortical tissue as the brain's synaptic density. Over our lifetimes, our brain's synaptic density changes in an interesting, patterned way. This pattern of synaptic change and what it might mean is the first neurobiological strand of the Myth of the First Three Years. (The second strand of the Myth deals with the notion of critical periods, and the third takes up the matter of enriched, or complex, environments.) Popular discussions of the new brain science trade heavily on what happens to synapses during infancy and childhood.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Dendrites Take Their Shape?
    © 2001 Nature Publishing Group http://neurosci.nature.com review How do dendrites take their shape? Ethan K. Scott1 and Liqun Luo1,2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA 2 Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA Correspondence should be addressed to L.L. ([email protected]) Recent technical advances have made possible the visualization and genetic manipulation of individual dendritic trees. These studies have led to the identification and characterization of molecules that are important for different aspects of dendritic development. Although much remains to be learned, the existing knowledge has allowed us to take initial steps toward a comprehensive understanding of how complex dendritic trees are built. In this review, we describe recent advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying dendritic morphogenesis, and discuss their cell-biological implications. With their great complexity and variety, dendrites (Fig. 1) are won- added advantage, can be used to study loss-of-function muta- ders of nature’s design. Built to receive and integrate inputs to neu- tions. Much of the progress reviewed in this article would not rons, dendrites occupy much of the brain’s volume and have been have been possible without these technological advances. the subject of studies since the days of Golgi and Cajal1. Over the course of much of the twentieth century, the prevailing belief that Breaking down complex dendritic trees axons take the more active role in wiring the brain and in estab- Although the processes used to build dendritic trees are complex lishing synaptic specificity led researchers to focus on the develop- and diverse (Fig.
    [Show full text]