DOCSLIB.ORG

DBC+Transactions+1972+Volume+

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DBC+Transactions+1972+Volume+ PHOTO BY JIM YOAKUM A COMPILATION OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 16TH ANNUAL MEETING, APRIL 5-7, 1972, AT TUCSON, ARIZONA. Edi toria1 Commi ttee: Charles Hansen , (Chairman) Norman Simmons William Graf Ray Breechbi 11 Jack Helvie Drawings by: Pat Hansen Special Contributor: U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada Copies avai 1abl e by writing the Desert Bighorn Council 1500 N. Decatur Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89108 THE KING OF DESERT BEAST Does the desert have a ki,ng of beasts? Who rules the plains and barren peaks that shimmer in the sun? Authority is given to many who crawl; as the rattler or the scorpion who mean it when they say "don't tread on me. " But who would give royalty to such as these. Mountain lion roam the desert edges or prowl across in winter when ics cool. But hers no desert king of beasts because he hasnvr got the guts to stay, Thirst driven beasts at desert water In summer he may retreat to sit express a sort of priority beside some mountain pool. and they -all give way to the herds of collared pig--the peccary. The coyote is a canine con man living off the desert; But pigs is pigs and I can't see Or in some way conning a living giving them the cloak of royalty. from you and me. But would he live as high My vote goes to the most elusive. without us One that most are lucky to even see, it would be interesting to see. The bighorn goes about his The burro overcomes the desert's threat. business in the roughest kind He dominates the toughest habitat, of topography and truly is a desert rat. and even seems to live where But, a choice of him water is a rarity. would not be mine a crown between his ears A king yet he asks no tribute, would be asinine. In fact he only asks to be, far away from you and me. He only asks that the desert stay the same. Unchanged neither by us nor the creatures we herd, or pet, or tame. Charles R. Hungerford DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL 1972 TPANSACTIOES Page REPORT OF THE FIRST NORTH AMERICAN WILD SHEEP CONFERENCE ............................O.O............ Warren Kelly 1 CENSUS OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP WITH TIME-LAPSE PHOTOGRAPHY ,.......GDYOO....O.D.o~OD.DDDDDso.......O Jack B, Helvie 3 1971 WILD HORSE AND BURRO ACT ...................... Roscoe E. Ferris 9 INTER-SPECIES EMBRYO TRANSFER IN TZE PROFAGATION OF RARE SPECIES OF WILD SHEEP ............ Thomas D. Bunch, Warren C. Foote and J. Juan Spillett WINTER FOOD HABITS OF CALIFORNIA BIGHORN SHEEP IN THE SIERRA NEVADA ...6.0..0000~.00e0.DOoC~~D0.0 David 3. Dunaway THE STATUS OF DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP ON THE PAPAGO INDIAN RESERVATION .........e................ David E. Brown HAZITAT OF THE MEXICAN BIGHORN SHEEP IN THE BIG EATCHET MOUNTAINS OF NEW MEXICO ..... Robert D. Jacobsen THE ARIZONA DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP SOCIETY, INC. ..... Robert D. Carson CONCLUSION OF THE BIGHORN INVESTIGATION I& CALIFORNIA .........................D.D.~.D Richard A. Weaver NEVADA'S DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP STATUS REPORT 1971 ..... Jack R. Cooper DISEASE LOSSES IN DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP BLACK GAP AREA .................................... Tommy L. Hailey PROGRESS REPORT - LAVA RZDS BIZHORN RE-ESTABLTSHMENT ....................... James A. Blaisdell A COOPERATIVE EFFORT WITH THE ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT ................................. Daniel F. Schadle DEVELOPMENT OF PERMANENT WILDLIFE WATER SUPPLIES JOSHUA TREE SATIaNAL MONUMENT ...................... ?eteu Lo Farry CAPTURE OF FREE-RANGING DESERT SHEEP IN SONORA, MEXICO c.....................D.~....O.OD... Gerald H. Gates FRATERNITY OF THE DESERT SIGHOR??-NEVADA ................. Carl Ciliax STATUS OF DESERT BLGHORN IN ARIZONA .....,.l..oo....m,.o Paul M. Webb PiAN'S INVASION INTO T'ilE BIGilORNFS HAijlTAi .......... Yaines R. DeForge dBSi2ISVATiONS TAKEFi DURXNG THE BIRTH OF CANDY'S 1972 LAMB ........................... George M. Constantino ATTENDANCE ROSTER ................................................... DBC OFFICERS, COMMITTEES AND AWARDS ................................. DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL 1972 TRANSACTIONS REPORT ON THE FIRST NORTH Al'ERICAi'*I WID SHEEP Warren Kelly Wildlife Biologist U.S. Forest Service The first North American Wild Sheep Conference was held April 14-15, 1971, at Colorado State University at Fort Collins. I must admit I was pleased when selected to represent the Desert Bighorn Council at this meeting. A total of 111 people registered for the conference. Thirty-one of those attending the conference were Forest Service representatives. This was not surprising since the Forest Service is the land management agency controlling a considerable amount of Rocky Mountain bighorn habitat. There were fewer representatives from state wildlife agencies than I expected.. Colorado, as could be expected, was well represented with 28 representatives. There was only one from Arizona and New Mexico; two from Wyoming and Canada. Others attending were representatives of National Fark Service, Bureau of Land Management, Universities and those just interested fn bighorn sheep. Co-Chairman, Gene Decker of Colorado State University and Wayne Sanfort, Colorado Division of Game, Fish and Parks, developed and excellent program. The agenda was divided into four sections; management and current status; physiology and pathology; research techniques; and management problems, procedures and needs. The first section was status reports from five states; Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. I served as moderator of this panel and had an opportunity to give the objectives and history of the Desert Bighorn Council. The second section; physiology and pathology, presented information on lung worm infections and the pneumonia complex. The third section; research techniques, dealt with food habits, marking, immobilization of sheep with drugs, and habitat analysis by multispectrol remote sensing. DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL 1972 TRAKSACTIONS The last section; management problems, procedures and needs, gave an insight to problems in managing three bighorn sheep herds. The North American Wild Sheep Conference was an interesting, well executed meeting. I can see this is a meeting that should be continued. I would like to recommend to the Program Chairman of the next North American Wild Sheep Conference that he read the table of Contents of the D.B.C. Transactions. Over 300 papers can cover a great amount of information and there is little need of repeating what has already been published unless new information can be added to the subject. I want to thank the D.BOC. for sending me to this conference as their representative. DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL 1972 TRANSACTIONS CE16US OF DESERT BIGtIORi'i SHEEP WITH TIFF-LAPSE PHOTOGWHY Jack Be Helvie Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Desert National Wildlife Range Las Vegas, Nevada Abstract: Two time-lapse movie cameras were placed at 13 water-holes on the Desert National Wildlife Range during the summer of 1971. Intervalometers on the cameras were adjusted to expose one frame of film each minute. Depending upon the type of film used, a camera was left at each waterhole for a period of either three or five days. At the end of these pre-determined periods cameras and exposed film were picked up and the film developed. The developed film was then viewed through an edi-viewer and under a low power binocular microscope to facilitate identification and classification of sheep and other forms of wildlife. This technique proved to be quite successful for recording wildlife use at waterholes during daylight hours. A total of 99 sheep, 23 deer, five golden eagles, three coyotes, two red-tailed hawks, and one mountain lion were photographed. Ninety-two (93%) of the sheep photographed were classified. INTRODUCTION The initiation of management on any piece of land usually involves four consectltive steps. The first step is census, and is defined as "measuring the stock on hand" (Leopold, 1933). The search for adequate desert bighorn sheep census techniques has been going on for many years. More than 15 different types of wildlife camera-recorders have been devised and used in the field with satisfactory results (Drobnick, 1969). fersonnel at the Desert National Wildlife Range became very interested in wildlife camera- recorders after listening to a paper presented by Rudy Drobnick at the 1969 Desert Bighorn Council meeting. Subsequently we experimented with vibration- sensor photography during the summer of 1970, and then learned of a "home made" time-lapse camera unit that was being used by Erwin L. Boeker in Arizona (Boeker, personal communication)^ After muck investigation into the various aspects of time-lapse photography, we purchased two Minolta* cameras 'kBrand names are for the benefit of the reader and do not imply endorsement. DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL 1972 TRANSACTIONS with intervalometers and used thex for bighorn census at waterholes with good success during the suxmer of 1971. All personnel at Desert National Wildlife Range worked on this study and contributed to its success. MATERIALS The camera used in this study is a Super 8 millimeter movie camera described as the Minolta Autopak-8 D4. The camera is equipped with a Rokkor f 1.8 zoom lens that is continuously variable from 915 mm to 38 mm (4x1. The shutter speed is 1/40 second when taking single frame exposures. Dimensions of the camera are 2 3/4 x 5 x 8 inches, and it weighs 39 ounces. Power source for the camera comes from four AA size 1.5 volt dry batteries. Retail cost of this camera is about $175. To conduct time-lapse photography it is necessary to use a Minolta Intervalometer-P, which is a repeating timer. This intervalometer enables the camera to do time-lapse filming at rates from 0.5 through 60 seconds between single-frame exposures. The intervalometer is cylindrical, measures 2 x 5 inches, and weighs eight ounces. Retail cost of the intervalometer is approximately $40. It is powered by five AA size 1.5 volt dry batteries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Craters of the Pinacate Mountains, Sonora, Mexico
    O"r/l MARICOPA \ r I I r- ···� . ____ . / � · . _·.· . / r­ I PIN A L . TORTOLITA . �\ . / MTS. a n a CIMARRON '\... �, t MTS. .. .�! 7-'cou��- --------- �I _\ h \ � :. / 'i.. , � - VentanaX, , ' . JI Cave ......\. � �',_ ... -- ( -;." 'fl _..D I __ Vaya Chin : F' G I Achiu � � r .. .. PA P A 0 . GlI ---. SIERRA �/ / '", , BLANCA ' MTS. ., G \ \ INDIAN D' Wahok \ Hotrontk ---L--.. Ovef'lap with . tv f U1 'igUr8� tv I I \ I I I 'I _ .. ·�-t i F (. -.... -- v"'-t :: .. �::. 5__6/1s ,.-\. '-...- Sells � I t-- 1. / <" I �/'<S ..°0 : '-'- '0 _/ '-:.. V �:I C " " _ . A'. "- � '� . N EXPLAN ATION " � , . .O. J " r " . -t- � , I V'.. .............. .. "--.. \ , '''.''''''''.. ' ''- :' '''- '" eo t< I .0 .' ::,."<"/ . "" 0' . I . • Numbered QJare a s desi gnate - ... , ••• . " 0.' -........ �I .-\ . C,o" I \ "$o '). figures te '- , -....I" < 0 ", ' x �fT "" c.\"/ � . I- in t . " REN. \ / ' \,g. ';; r. \ . ,. -""- ,JI ' '" :!., �" I "" ) I I lO "- ��, '\ I I I ° " " yJ ........ "- ". � s e a Ie , � , ."- , "','" ,,,,�, FIGURE 55. Index map of a part of central southern Arizona showing route of east half of Field Trip VI, locations and figure numbers of maps for Field Trip s I, II, III, and IV and related articles, and gener­ alized locations of diagrammatic cross sections shown in figures 56, 59, and 60. � Pinacates-Trip VI- l VOLCANIC CRATERS OF THE PINACATE MOUNTAINS, SONORA, MEXICO TRIP VI, ROAD LOG First Day, Sunday, Ap ril 5, 1959 Leaders: F. W. Galbraith, L. A. Heindl, and G. G. Sykes Driving Distance: 200. 7 miles Logged Distance: 200. 7 miles Note: This trip will leave at 6:00 A. M. from the parking lot north of the Geology building .
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1603-A UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE COXCOMB MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (CDCA-328), SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By J. P. Calzia, J. E. Kilburn, R. W. Simpson, Jr., and C. M. Alien U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine their mineral resource potential. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-328), California Desert Conservation Area, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California. SUMMARY Geologic, geochemical, geophysical, and mineral surveys within the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area in south­ eastern California define several areas with low to moderate potential for base and precious metals. Inferred subeconomic re­ sources of gold at the Moser mine (area Ha) are estimated at 150,000 tons averaging 1.7 ppm Au. The remainder of the study area has low potential for other mineral and energy resources including radioactive minerals and geothermal resources. Oil, gas, and coal resources are not present within the wilderness study area. INTRODUCTION Hope (1966), Greene (1968), and Calzia (1982) indicate that the wilderness study area is underlain by metaigneous and The Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area metasedimentary rocks of Jurassic and (or) older age intruded (CDCA-328) is located in the Mojave Desert of southeastern by granitic rocks of Late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous age.
    [Show full text]
  • CERROS DE TRINCHERAS in the ARIZONA PAPAGUERIA By
    Cerros de Trincheras in the Arizona Papagueria Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Stacy, Valeria Kay Pheriba, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 14:38:01 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565310 CERROS DE TRINCHERAS IN THE ARIZONA PAPAGUERIA by Valeria Kay Pheriba Stacy A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY . In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 4 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction b y _______Valeria Kay Pheriba Stacv________________ , entitled Cerros de Trincheras in the Arizona Papagueria_____ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of _____________Doctor of Philosophy___________________ / 3 /9 7^ y ' ' Dissertation Director / Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and_%ecommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrow­ ers under rules of the Library.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Worksheets
    10 18 " 13 4 47 ! ! ! 47 " " 11 Piute Valley and Sacramento Mountains 54 " ! ! 87 12 ! 81 " 4 55 61 22 " ! " Pinto Lucerne Valley and Eastern Slopes ! 63 33 " 56 " " " 36 25 Colorado Desert " 20 ! " " 59 37 ! 2 ! 19 " ! 16 19 ! 56 21 " ! ! 15 27 ! 38 Arizona Lake Cahuilla 72 Lake Cahuilla 48 57 " ! ! 57 ! " 34 35 84 ! " 42 76 ! 26 41 ! " 0 5 10 14 58I Miles 28 " " 43 ! ! ! ! 8!9 Existing " Proposed DRECPSubareas 66 62 Colorado Desert Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) ACECs within the Colorado Desert Subarea # Proposed ACECs 12 Cadiz Valley Chuckwalla Central 19 (covered in Chuckwalla, see below)) Chuckwalla Extension 20 (covered in Chuckwalla, see below) Chuckwalla Mountains Central 21 (covered in Corn Springs, see below) 22 Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage Joshua Tree to Palen Corridor 33 (covered in Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage) 36 McCoy Valley 37 McCoy Wash 38 Mule McCoy 44 Palen Ford Playa Dunes 48 Picacho Turtle Mountains Corridor 55 (covered in Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage) 56 Upper McCoy # Existing ACECs (within DRECP boundary) 2 Alligator Rock 15 Chuckwalla 16 Chuckwalla Valley Dune Thicket 19 Corn Springs 25 Desert Lily Preserve 56 Mule Mountains 59 Palen Dry Lake 61 Patton's Iron Mountain Divisional Camp 81 Turtle Mountains Cadiz Valley Description/Location: North of Hwy 62, south of Hwy 40 between the Sheep Hole mountains to the west and the Chemehuevi ACEC to the east. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological: The Cadiz Valley contains an enormous variation of Mojave vegetation, from Ajo Lilies to Mojave Yucca. Bighorn, deer and mountain lion easily migrate between basin and range mountains of the Sheephole, Calumet Mountains, Iron Mountains, Kilbeck Hills and Old Woman Mountains with little or no human infrastructure limits.
    [Show full text]
  • (RESULTS of NATION-WIDE SURVEY) -- January 29, 1939 A
    INFORMATION FOR TEE - ’ Chited StatecDepartment of Agridbe . I For Jan. 29 pspers WASHINGTON,D. C. 5,OOC,OOO BIG GM ANI- IN THE U. S. Biological Survey Beports Results of First Nation-Wide Inventory The first nation-wide attempt to determine the number of big-game animals in the United States showed more than 5 million, reports the Bureau of Biological Survey, U. S. Department of Agriculture. The survey - conducted in 1937 by the Bureau with cooperation from the National Park Service, the Boreet Service, State game and conservation commission8 and other well-informed agencies and individuals -- covered deer, elk, antelope, buffalo, moose, mountain goat, bighorn sheep, peccary, bears, caribou, and exotic European wild boars. The inventory did not include animals in captivity. Deer numbered more than 4,500,OOO. Michigan end Pennsylvania led in white- California had 450,000 tailed deer with approximately 800,000 in each State. * mule and black-tailed deer. Elk in the country totalled 165,000; moose, 13,000; antelope, 130,000; bighorn sheep, 17,000; black bear, 81,000; grizzly bear, 1,100; and buffalo, 4,100. There were 43,000 peccaries and 700 European wild boars. Data for 2 or more years, the Division of Wildlife Reeearoh of the Bureau of Biological survey points out , are required before definite conclusions can be drawn on recent trends In big-game numbers. Accounts of animal numbers published some years ego, however, provide the Division with some basis for comparison. Antelope, once thought facing extinction, incroasad about 500 percent from 1924 to 1937. The number of bighorn sheep, on the other haad, dropped from 28 000 (an estimate made by E.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Mammals from Extinction Cave, Belize
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Pleistocene Mammals From Extinction Cave, Belize Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2018-0178.R3 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-May-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Churcher, C.S.; University of Toronto, Zoology Central America, Pleistocene, Fauna, Vertebrate Palaeontology, Keyword: Limestone cave Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Not applicableDraft (regular submission) Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 43 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 1 PLEISTOCENE MAMMALS FROM EXTINCTION CAVE, BELIZE 2 by C.S. CHURCHER1 Draft 1Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 2C6 and 322-240 Dallas Rd., Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8V 4X9 (corresponding address): e-mail [email protected] https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 43 2 4 5 ABSTRACT. A small mammalian fauna is recorded from Extinction Cave (also called Sibun 6 Cave), east of Belmopan, on the Sibun River, Belize, Central America. The animals recognized 7 are armadillo (†Dasypus bellus), American lion (†Panthera atrox), jaguar (P. onca), puma or 8 mountain lion (Puma concolor), Florida spectacled bear (†Tremarctos floridanus), javelina or 9 collared peccary (Pecari tajacu), llama (Camelidae indet., ?†Palaeolama mirifica), red brocket 10 deer (Mazama americana), bison (Bison sp.) and Mexican half-ass (†Equus conversidens), and 11 sabre-tooth cat († Smilodon fatalis) may also be represented (‘†’ indicates an extinct taxon). 12 Bear and bison are absent from the region today. The bison record is one of the more southernly 13 known. The bear record is almost the mostDraft westerly known and a first for Central America.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinel 10-27
    The San Bernardino County News of Note from Around the Largest County in the Lower 48 States Friday, OctoberSentinel 27, 2017 A Fortunado Publication in conjunction with Countywide News Service 10808 Foothill Blvd. Suite 160-446 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (951) 567-1936 Wonder Valley Chromium & Arsenic H2O Levels 1,000 Times Over Limit Industry’s Tres By Mark Gutglueck Indications are, how- miles northeast of the Amboy Road and State nent living structures Hermanos Sun The San Bernardino ever, that there is no east entrance to Joshua Route 62 run through built by homesteaders County Fire Depart- county agency mandated Tree National Park. The Wonder Valley and ex- under the Small Tract Power Plan ment’s reflexive move to with responsibility to town lies south of the ist as the community’s Act, also known as the Begets Greater protect its firefighters in safeguard residents and Sheep Hole Mountains primary paved roads, “Baby Homestead Act,” reaction to the discovery their drinking water sup- and Bullion Mountains with the vast major- between 1938 and the Uncertainty of well water contamina- ply in the face of the risk and north of the Pinto ity of the community’s mid-1960s, once dot- tion in Wonder Valley that has been identified. Mountains at an eleva- streets existing as dirt ted the landscape in the is raising the specter of Wonder Valley is an tion range of 1,200 feet roads or ones that have 150-square-mile area, a wider contamination unincorporated com- to 1,800 feet near the been oiled and impacted.
    [Show full text]
  • Play Behavior and Dominance Relationships of Bighorn Sheep on the National Bison Range
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1986 Play behavior and dominance relationships of bighorn sheep on the National Bison Range Christine C. Hass The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hass, Christine C., "Play behavior and dominance relationships of bighorn sheep on the National Bison Range" (1986). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7375. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7375 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 This is an unpublished m a n u s c r i p t in w h i c h c o p y r i g h t s u b ­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r i n t i n g of its c o n t e n t s m ust be a p p r o v e d BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ibrary Un i v e r s i t y of McwTANA Date : 1 98ft. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Palen Solar Project, Draft Supplemental EIS/EIR/LUPA
    Palen Solar Project 4: Introduction *Please refer to tables 4.1-1 Existing Projects t:J ROW Boundary Joshua Tree National Park and 4.1-2 for Existing and f.:··::r:::·I Wilderness Area Foreseeable Projects 0 /V C] ~ Section 368 Energy Corridors Figure 4.1-1 e r-----, Area of Critical Environmental Foreseeable Projects DRECP Development Focus Areas L___J Concern Cumulative Projects: 0 4 8 Bureau of Land Management Land Miles 0 ,,,,,; CJ National Landscape Existing and Foreseeable Conservation System Draft Supplemental EIS/EIR/LUPA Palen Solar Project 4.10-1: Paleontolo ical Resources I I - ' D ROW Boundary Geologic Unit and Paleontological Sensitivity Figure 4.10-1 8 ( ~ Fenceline Qya/Qal; Class 5 - Low to High Sensitivity (increasing with depth) Paleontological Sensitivity of 0 0.5 1 - Qoa; Class 3 - Moderate Sensitivity Miles Project Area Geologic Units Draft Supplemental EIS/EIR/LUPA Palen Solar PV Project 3.16: Transportation and Public Access ,,. I ; ; ;-· ,,.. I -- ; / .,,/,,..-­-· .... ........ .... ·, ................. --­ ------­ .... ''·,,,.,, -...._._ ............... -.... ...... _ '·.... __________ ---. ..... ­...._ ..... _ ............ .... ~~~~--1 -·­....__._ ...._ __ _ .... ......... _. ____ ........ .... .... Source: Owlshead GPS • / Off-Highway Vehicle Property Boundary Project, 2013 1 c:::::J " ' (OHV) Route 8 c:::::J Fenceline /'./ Gen-Tie Line Figure 4.12-1 BLM Land 0 0.25 0.5 Removed for OHV Road Miles Avoidance (29.3 ac.) Open Route Mitigation June 2017 Palen Solar Project 4.14: Soil Resources Zone Ill Zone II ' ~~---....:.:.::___r=:JFRUOW Boundary .---·1 Sand TransPort Zone L._ ___J L nd CJ Reduced Footprint Bureau of a d Figure 4.14-1 E:223 Alternative . Management Lan 1 Miles ~AVOI·dance Alternative rt Zone and Alternatives San d Transpo I mental EIS/EIR/LUPA Draft Supp e Palen Solar Project Visual Resources Proposed Gen-Tie Line 1 2 o__..1Miles i.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 As Amended
    the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as amended U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Desert District Riverside, California the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as Amended IN REPLY REFER TO United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT STATE OFFICE Federal Office Building 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Reader: Thank you.You and many other interested citizens like you have made this California Desert Conservation Area Plan. It was conceived of your interests and concerns, born into law through your elected representatives, molded by your direct personal involvement, matured and refined through public conflict, interaction, and compromise, and completed as a result of your review, comment and advice. It is a good plan. You have reason to be proud. Perhaps, as individuals, we may say, “This is not exactly the plan I would like,” but together we can say, “This is a plan we can agree on, it is fair, and it is possible.” This is the most important part of all, because this Plan is only a beginning. A plan is a piece of paper-what counts is what happens on the ground. The California Desert Plan encompasses a tremendous area and many different resources and uses. The decisions in the Plan are major and important, but they are only general guides to site—specific actions. The job ahead of us now involves three tasks: —Site-specific plans, such as grazing allotment management plans or vehicle route designation; —On-the-ground actions, such as granting mineral leases, developing water sources for wildlife, building fences for livestock pastures or for protecting petroglyphs; and —Keeping people informed of and involved in putting the Plan to work on the ground, and in changing the Plan to meet future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn
    Final Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 6 October 2010 This page left blank intentionally 6 October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION............................................ 1 1.1 Proposed Action.............................................................. 2 1.2 Project Need................................................................. 6 1.3 Background Information on Sonoran Pronghorn . 9 1.3.1 Taxonomy.............................................................. 9 1.3.2 Historic Distribution and Abundance......................................... 9 1.3.3 Current Distribution and Abundance........................................ 10 1.3.4 Life History............................................................ 12 1.3.5 Habitat................................................................ 13 1.3.6 Food and Water......................................................... 18 1.3.7 Home Range, Movement, and Habitat Area Requirements . 18 1.4 Project Purpose ............................................................. 19 1.5 Decision to be Made.......................................................... 19 1.6 Compliance with Laws, Regulations, and Plans . 19 1.7 Permitting Requirements and Authorizations Needed . 21 1.8 Scoping Summary............................................................ 21 1.8.1 Internal Agency Scoping.................................................. 21 1.8.2 Public Scoping ........................................................
    [Show full text]