Assessment of Dewatering Impacts on Stream Fisheries in the Arkansas and Cimarron Rivers"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of Dewatering Impacts on Stream Fisheries in the Arkansas and Cimarron Rivers ASSESSMENT OF DEWATERING IMPACTS ON STREAM FISHERIES IN THE ARKANSAS AND CIMARRON RIVERS" Frank B. Cross, Randall E. Moss and Joseph T. Collins Museum of Natural History University of Kansas, Lawrence, Ks. Introduction This report concerns the status of fishes in the Arkansas River and streams south of the Arkansas mainstream in Kansas. It is based mainly on visits to 35 sites on the Arkansas River, Cimarron River, and intervening tributaries (Fig. 1) on 16-23 July 1983. Fish collections were made at 23 sites having water; stream beds were dry at 12 sites. Supplementing our collections are other collections made from 1979 through 1983 by O. T. Gorman and D. Wiseman of the University of Kansas, Dr. Robert Clarke of Emporia State University, K. Brunson and other personnel of the Kansas Fish and Game Commission, and Dr. D. A. Distler and students at Wichita State University. Their collections increase the number of localities represented to 46, and provide replicate samples from some of our 35 sites. Our objectives were to locate populations of several species characteristic of the western Plains segment of the Arkansas River basin; to assess the extent to which these fishes are threatened, by comparison of current and historical distributional records; and to examine the relationship between changes in stream flows and changes in the status of each species. The species of "primary concern" are the Arkansas River form of the Speckled chub (Hybopsis aestivalis tetranemus), Flathead chub (Hybopsis gracilis), Emerald shiner (Notropis atherinoides), River shiner (Notropis blennius), Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi), Plains minnow (Hybognathus placitus), Plains killifish (Fundulus zebrinus with which F. kansae is considered conspecific), and Arkansas darter (Etheostoma cragini). Additional species that were captured in 1979-83 are discussed briefly. The various collections included a total of 42 species of fishes. Records of fishes cited in this report extend from 1853 to the present. Reports by Cragin (1885) and Gilbert (1885,1886) provide baseline information on fishes in the western part of the basin, especially the Arkansas River at Garden City and the Medicine Lodge drainage in Barber County during the early years 1 Nongame Wildlife Contract No. 46, Kansas Fish and Game Commission and The University of Kansas (KU 5400-0705). Field work was conducted by the authors and Kelly J. Irwin of Topeka, and at some sites by Ken Brunson, Kansas Fish and Game Commission. All photographs in this report are by J. T. Collins. Figure 1. Location of all sites visited during this study (1979-1983). Large solid circles represent sites containing water and which were sampled in 1983. Open circles represent sites without water during this survey in July 1983. Small solid circles repre- sent sites sampled by 0. T. Gorman in 1979. 2 of settlement. Jordan's (1891) list of species from the "Arkansas River at 1 Wichita" affords an interesting but less secure baseline on the fauna in the lower mainstream; those fishes may have come from various streams in the Wichita area rather than the single site reported. Data available from a few collections made in the 1920's and 1940's are cited. Most of the collections useful for comparison with the 1979-83 series were made in the period 1951-67 by personnel of the University of Kansas. Sampling methods were similar in those collections and the 1979-83 series of collections: haul seines of 6-foot to 30-foot length, 1/8 to 3/8-inch mesh, operated by personnel with comparable training. The same persons were involved in many of the collections. Their main objective was to determine species composition at each site. Early collections did not include counts of fishes captured, but the terms "abundant, common, frequent, scarce, and rare" were used in field notes on many of the collections to indicate relative abundance of the species taken. Specimens catalogued into research 1 collections of the Museum of Natural History provide data on minimum numbers captured in several instances critical for determination of changes in the abundance of species within the 30-year period covered by these records. From about 1962 to date, quantitative records accompany most collections (counts of individual fish of each species caught). Results of stream surveys by personnel of the Kansas Fish and Game Com- mission, chiefly in 1974-76, are incorporated into the report where those records seem appropriate. The KFG collections were intensive on short stream segments, involving use of electrofishing gear or toxins as the principal sampling method. Differences in field methods and objectives of those surveys dictate caution in comparing the KFG results with ours. Stream-flow records were obtained from the U. S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Section, through the cooperation of Dr. Paul Jordan of that agency. Our purpose was to explore possible cause-and-effect relationships between historic changes in discharge and changes in the composition of fish faunas throughout the region surveyed. Therefore gaging-station data were selected on the basis of the number of years each station has operated, and its location with respect to sites from which fish collections are available. The results of this project are arranged under the following headings: 1) Hydrologic records; 2) Fish faunas and habitat notes at sites (or stream reaches)for which an historic record is available; 3) Accounts of species of primary concern; 4) Accounts of other species captured in 1979-83; 5) Summary; and 6) Appendix - field notes on collections made in 1983. 3 HYDROLOGIC RECORDS Analysis of Discharge Rates at USGS Gaging Stations Records of mean daily discharge, expressed as cubic feet per second (cfs) were examined for the following USGS stream gaging stations: Arkansas River at Syracuse, Hamilton County; Dodge City, Ford County; Great Bend, Barton County; and Wichita, Sedgwick County; Cimarron River at bridge on Highway K-23, Meade County; Crooked Creek near Nye, Meade County; Medicine Lodge River near Kiowa, Barber County; and Ninnescah River near Peck, Sumner County. The records used were summarized in three ways at each station. The first data set indicated the number of days in each water year (ending September 30) in which the mean daily discharge fell within serially arranged classes (discharge ranges). That summary also included flow duration tables giving daily rates of discharge that were exceeded at specified frequencies (10% to 95% of the time), within certain periods of years. The periods selected for comparison were: origin of records through 1942 (or through 1965, if few records existed prior to 1942 at a station); 1943 through 1965; 1966 through 1976; and 1977 through 1982, the last year for which such summaries were available. The second data set consisted of summaries like the first set, organized on a monthly basis rather than annual basis. The third data set listed the peak flows (highest instantaneous discharge rates rather than mean daily rates) recorded in each year together with the dates on which they occurred. Chronological trends at each station are discussed in the following paragraphs. The ranges and seasonal patterns of discharge are described in successive periods of years; then, attention is given to the incidence of high flows, for reasons relating to reproductive requirements of some fishes of primary concern in this report. Syracuse Discharge records at Syracuse are divided into four periods (1904, 1905, and 1923-42 = 22 years; 1943-65 = 23 years; 1966-76 = 11 years; and 1977-82 = 6 years). Figure 2 is a flow duration curve that indicates the percent of time (days) discharge exceeded the values plotted, in each of the four periods. In 1904-42, flows greater than 980 cfs occurred about 10% of the time. At the other extreme, low-flows 4 - 800 1 400 200 100 W 80 • 60 10 8- 0 4 2 1977-82 \ 1966-76 (1) 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Figure 2. Flow duration in the Arkansas River at Syracuse, Hamilton County, Kansas. Rates of discharge that were exceeded 10%, 25%, 50%, 70%, 75%, 90% and 95% of the time are plotted for four successive periods of years. Lines intersecting the x-axis indicate flows less than 1.0 cfs. Data from gaging station records of the U.S. Geological Survey. 5 (those exceeded 90% of the time) were only about 5 cfs; flows less than 3 cfs occurred 5% of the time. The steep incline of this curve reflects the natural variability of discharge rates in the Arkansas River in western Kansas, although the rates recorded may already have been influenced by irrigation diversions, which began more than a century ago Beginning in 1942, John Martin Reservoir in eastern Colorado modified the flow regime by retaining water, chiefly during high flows, for later release to meet irrigation needs. Thus, in the period 1943-65, flows of 10% frequency at Syracuse were significantly reduced -- from 980 to 450 cfs -- but discharge rates of 50% or greater frequency increased (Fig. 2). For example, flows exceeded 75% of the time averaged only 17 cfs prior to impoundment, but increased to 62 cfs for the 23-year period following construction of John Martin Reservoir. The initial effect of the impoundment was to flatten the curve by moderating both extremes (reducing peak flows and increasing minimum flows). In the third period (1966-76) flows of 10% to 90% frequency declined slightly (Fig. 2), but "minimum" flows (95% frequency) dropped from 5.7 cfs to approximately 1 cfs. The most dramatic reduction in discharge rates of the Arkansas at Syracuse occurred in the final period (1977-82; Fig. 2). The incline of the duration curve for 1977-82 nearly parallels that for the original period (1904-42), but the discharge rates at each level of frequency are only one-fourth to one-tenth those in the original period.
Recommended publications
  • Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary
    2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City
    LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit (AU): Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City Water Quality Impairment: Chloride 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Ark River (Derby), Ark River (Oxford), Ark River (Ark City), South Fork Ninnescah River, Ninnescah River, Slate Creek, Unmonitored Basin County: Cowley, Sumner, Sedgwick, Kingman, Pratt, Kiowa HUC 8: 11030013, 11030015, 11030016, 11060001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): 11030013020(050) 11030013030(010, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015030(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060) 11030016010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050) 11030016020(010, 020, 030) 11060001040(010) Ecoregion: Central Great Plains, Wellington-McPherson Lowland (27d) Flint Hills (28) Drainage Area: 1,653 square miles Main Stem Segments: 11030013 (AU Station 528): Slate Cr (17) (AU Station 281): Arkansas R (3-part) (AU Station 527): Arkansas R (2-part, 3-part, 18) (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (1, 2-part) 11030015 (AU Station 036): S.F. Ninnescah R (1,3,4,6) 11030016 (AU Station 280): Ninnescah R (1,3,8) 11060001 (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (14, 18) 1 Main Stem Segments with Tributaries by HUC 8 and Watershed/Station Number: Table 1 (a-f) a. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Slate Creek Station 528 Slate Cr (17) (partial) Winser Cr (32) Antelope Cr (25) Beaver Cr (29)* Hargis Cr (24)* Oak Cr (26)* Spring Cr (27)* * Not impaired b. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Derby) Station 281 Arkansas R (3 - part) Spring Cr (37) c. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Oxford) Station 527 Arkansas R (2 -part) Spring Cr (34) Lost Cr (23) Arkansas R (18) Arkansas R (3 - part) Bitter Cr (28) Dog Cr (531) d.
    [Show full text]
  • South-Central Kansas (Homeland Security Region G) Multi-Hazard, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan
    South-Central Kansas (Homeland Security Region G) Multi-Hazard, Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Plan Prepared For and Developed With the Jurisdictions Within and Including: Butler County, Cowley County, Harper County, Harvey County, Kingman County, Marion County, McPherson County, Reno County, Rice County , Sedgwick County and Sumner County December, 2013 Prepared By: Blue Umbrella TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... Executive-1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING COMMITTEE .....................................................Hazard-1 RESOLUTIONS OF ADOPTION .............................................................................. Resolutions-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE PLANNING PROCESS .................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 .......................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Hazard Mitigation Planning Process ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT 100-Hour Audit Plumb Thicket
    PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT 100-Hour Audit Plumb Thicket Landfill Application: Determining Whether KDHE’s Review Complied with Applicable Laws and Regulations A Report to the Legislative Post Audit Committee By the Legislative Division of Post Audit State of Kansas June 2004 04-18 Legislative Post Audit Committee Legislative Division of Post Audit THE LEGISLATIVE POST Audit Committee and tors or committees should make their requests its audit agency, the Legislative Division of Post for performance audits through the Chairman or Audit, are the audit arm of Kansas government. any other member of the Committee. Copies of The programs and activities of State government all completed performance audits are available now cost about $9 billion a year. As legislators from the Division’s office. and administrators try increasingly to allocate tax dollars effectively and make government work more efficiently, they need information to evalu- ate the work of governmental agencies. The LEGISLATIVE POST AUDIT COMMITTEE audit work performed by Legislative Post Audit helps provide that information. Senator Derek Schmidt, Chair Senator Bill Bunten We conduct our audit work in accor- Senator Anthony Hensley dance with applicable government auditing stan- Senator Dave Kerr dards set forth by the U.S. General Accounting Senator Chris Steineger Office. These standards pertain to the auditor’s professional qualifications, the quality of the au- Representative John Edmonds, Vice-Chair dit work, and the characteristics of professional Representative Tom Burroughs and meaningful reports. The standards also Representative Bill McCreary have been endorsed by the American Institute Representative Frank Miller of Certified Public Accountants and adopted by Representative Dan Thimesch the Legislative Post Audit Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECK out OTHER FISHING INFORMATION at OUR WEBSITE: Kansas Fishing: We’Ve Come a Long Way, Baby!
    Details Back Cover CHECK OUT OTHER FISHING INFORMATION AT OUR WEBSITE: www.kdwp.state.ks.us Kansas fishing: We’ve come a long way, baby! hat's right. Kansas fishing isn't what it used to be. It's much more. Oh, we still have some of the best channel, Tflathead, and blue catfishing to be found, but today Kansas anglers have great variety. If you're an old-school angler and still want to catch the whiskered fish native to our streams and rivers, you have more opportunities today than ever. Channel catfish are found in nearly every stream, river, pond, lake, and reservoir in the state. They remain one of the most popular angling species. To keep up with demand, state fish hatcheries produce mil- lions of channel cats each year. Some are stocked into lakes as fry, but more are fed and grown to catchable size, then stocked into one of many state and community lakes around the state. Our reservoirs hold amazing numbers of channel catfish, and for the most part, the reservoir cats are overlooked by anglers fishing for other species. Fisheries biologists consider channel cats an underutilized resource in most large reservoirs. For sheer excitement, the flathead catfish is still king. Monster flatheads weighing 60, 70 and even 80 pounds are caught each owned, but some reaches are leased by the department through summer. Most of the truly large flatheads come from the larger the Fishing Impoundments and Stream Habitats (F.I.S.H) rivers in the eastern half of the state, where setting limb and trot Program, while other reaches are in public ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • By JB Gillespie and GD Hargadine
    GEOHYDROLOGY AND SALINE GROUND-WATER DISCHARGE TO THE SOUTH FORK NINNESCAH RIVER IN PRATT AND KINGMAN COUNTIES, SOUTH-CENTRAL KANSAS By J.B. Gillespie and G.D. Hargadine U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4177 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF WICHITA, SEDGWICK COUNTY, and the KANSAS WATER OFFICE Lawrence, Kansas 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 4821 Quail Crest Place Denver Federal Center Lawrence, Kansas 66049-3839 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Definition of terms.......................................................................................................................... vii Abstract............................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope................................................................................................................2 Previous studies................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the ARMY PERMIT Permittee General Public
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee General Public Permit No. GP-40 (Natural Resources Conservation Service – Agricultural Conservation Practices). Issuing Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: This regional general permit authorizes the discharge of dredged or fill material for agriculture conservation practices in waters of the United States within the state of Kansas. In order to provide a comprehensive tool to land owners, this general permit is intended to encompass the following Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) designed and/or approved activities, where they have minimal adverse impacts, including those authorized by existing Nationwide Permits, in a single permit instrument: 1. Grassed waterways 2. Grade stabilization structures 3. Heavy use protection areas 4. Pipelines 5. Spring and seep developments 6. Ponds 7. Diversions 8. Water and sediment control basins 9. Wetland enhancement, creation and restoration 10. Stream and Shoreline Stabilization, Enhancement and Restoration 11. Subsurface Drainage 12. Terraces 13. Lined Waterway or Outlet DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AUTHORIZED BY THIS REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT: The activities must be designed and/or approved by NRCS (this may include Technical Service Providers). Project specific design criteria are outlined in Appendices 1 -13.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened & Endangered Species
    KANSAS Threatened & Endangered Species A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO SPECIES LISTED OR CONSIDERED FOR LISTING AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED IN KANSAS BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. INCLUDES SPECIES DESCRIPTION, RANGE MAP, AND HABITAT DESIGNATION. Edited and published by the Kansas Department of Wildlife & Parks, Environmental Section. AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE Nicrophorus americanus RANGE MAP STATUS CHEYENNE DONIPHAN RAWLINS DECATUR NORTON PHILLIPS SMITH JEWELL REPUBLIC WASHINGTON MARSHALL NEMAHA BROWN KANSAS: Endangered CLOUD ATCHISON SHERMAN THOMAS SHERIDAN GRAHAM ROOKS OSBORNE MITCHELL CLAY RILEY POTTAWATOMIE JEFFERSON FEDERAL: Endangered - N JACKSON E H WYANDOTTE OTTAWA V T A R LINCOLN E O WALLACE L LOGAN GOVE W TREGO ELLIS RUSSELL SHAWNEE GEARY SALINE WABAUNSE ELLSWORTH MORRIS OSAGE DOUGLAS JOHNSON MAP KEY GREELEY WICHITA LYON FRANKLIN MIAMI SCOTT LANE NESS RUSH BARTON DICKINSON McPHERSON MARION RICE CHASE COFFEY ANDERSON LINN Probable Historic Range PAWNEE HAMILTON KEARNY FINNEY HODGEMAN RENO GREENWOOD WOODSON ALLEN BOURBON HARVEY STAFFORD SEDGWICK Known Historic Range EDWARDS STANTON PRATT GRANT HASKELL KIOWA KINGMAN CRAWFORD ELK GRAY FORD BUTLER MEADE WILSON NEOSHO MORTON CLARK SUMNER COWLEY STEVENS SEWARD HARPER MONT- LABETTE CHEROKEE Designated Critical Habitat CHAUTAUQUA GOMERY COMANCHE BARBER SPECIES DESCRIPTION This beetle is shiny black with the elytra (wing covers) having two orange-red markings. The most diagnostic feature of this beetle is the large orange-red markings on the raised portion of the pronotum. The species is up to 1.5 inches long. Historically, Kansas records exist in the eastern one-third of the state. The American Burying Beetles have been frequently found in upland grasslands or near the edge of grassland/forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninnescah River, North Fork
    LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Water Body: North Fork Ninnescah River Watershed Water Quality Impairment: pH 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: North Fork Ninnescah Counties: Reno, Stafford, Pratt, and Kingman HUC 8: 11030014 HUC 11s (HUC 14s): 010 (030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 020 (010, 020, 030, 040, 050) 030 (010, 020, 030, 040) Drainage Area: 819.0 square miles. Main Stem Segments: WQLS: 5 and 6; starting above Cheney Reservoir and ending in Stafford County near Stafford. (Figure 1) Tributary Segments: WQLS: Goose Creek (10) Red Rock Creek (12) Silver Creek (7) Non-WQLS: Crow Creek (11) Dooleyville Creek (8) Unnamed Stream (289) Unnamed Stream (999) Wolf Creek (9) Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support; Secondary Contact Recreation; Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Main Stem Segments Expected Aquatic Life Support and Food Procurement for Goose Creek Special Aquatic Life Support and Food Procurement for Red Rock Creek and Silver Creek 1998 303d Listing: Table 3 - Predominantly Natural Conditions Impact 1 Impaired Use: Aquatic Life Support Water Quality Standard: Artificial sources of pollution shall not cause the pH of any surface water outside of a zone of initial dilution to be below 6.5 and above 8.5 (KAR 28-16-28e(c)(2)(C)) North Fork Ninnescah River TMDL Reference Map %a SF RN %a Hutchinson %a St. John 11030014010 080 %a R %a N C e IN r d N e Stafford E SC e R AH k o R c , k N 11030014010 070 FK 11030014010 060 11030014010 090 11030014030 020 Arlington 11030014010 050 11030014020 030 11030014030010 11030014020050 %a 525 11030014010 30 r 11030014030 030 C r e 11030014030 040 v il S HUC 14 11030014010 040 11030014020 040 11030014020 020 Cities CHENEY LAKE %a Fixed Monitoring Site reek 11030014020 010 Goose C Streams Lakes County Drainage Area Pratt Kingman PR KM N %a W E 60612Miles S Figure 1 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Olde New Mexico
    Olde New Mexico Olde New Mexico By Robert D. Morritt Olde New Mexico, by Robert D. Morritt This book first published 2011 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2011 by Robert D. Morritt All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-2709-6, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-2709-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................... vii Preface........................................................................................................ ix Sources ....................................................................................................... xi The Clovis Culture ...................................................................................... 1 Timeline of New Mexico History................................................................ 5 Pueblo People.............................................................................................. 7 Coronado ................................................................................................... 11 Early El Paso ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Response of a Sand-Dominated River to Installation and Removal of a Temporary Run-Of-The-River Dam
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS River Res. Applic. (2014) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/rra.2843 RAPID RESPONSE OF A SAND-DOMINATED RIVER TO INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF A TEMPORARY RUN-OF-THE-RIVER DAM K. H. COSTIGANa,b*,†, C. M. RUFFINGa, J. S. PERKINc,d AND M. D. DANIELSa,e a Department of Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA b School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA c Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA d Department of Biology, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee, USA e Stroud Water Research Center, Avondale, Pennsylvania, USA ABSTRACT Run-of-the-river dams (RORDs) comprise the vast majority of dams on river systems and are commonly removed as a part of stream resto- ration strategies. Although these dams are routinely removed, few studies have documented the geomorphological responses of sand-bed rivers to the removal of RORDs. We examined the response of a large sand-bed river located in South-Central Kansas, USA, to the installation and removal of a dam that is installed annually for seasonal recreational purposes. Channel adjustments were tracked using cross-sections sampled over the course of 7 months as the dam was installed and subsequently removed. Multivariate spatiotemporal analysis revealed emergence of channel stability when the dam was in place for most cross-sections, except for those immediately adjacent to or at great distances from the dam. Our results provide an approximation for how sand-bed rivers respond to RORD construction and removal and are useful for guiding management decisions involving preservation or restoration of connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Nomination
    Kansas State Historical Society Register of Historic Kansas Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating individual properties and districts. The format is similar to the National Register of Historic Places form. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets. Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Historic name Furry Homestead Other names/site number Little Stone House Name of related Multiple Property Listing NA 2. Location street & number N.E. corner of N.E. 20th Street and N.E. 10th Avenue, Kingman not for publication city or town Kingman vicinity state Kansas code K.S. county Kingman code K.M. zip code 67068 3-4. Certification I hereby certify that this property is listed in the Register of Historic Kansas Places. Applicable State Register Criteria: X A B C D ____________________________________ Signature of certifying official/Title Patrick Zollner, Deputy SHPO Date Kansas State Historical Society State agency 1 Furry Homestead Kingman, Kingman County Name of Property City and County 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing X private building(s) 1 buildings public - Local district district public - State site site public - Federal structure structure object object 1 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the State Register None 6.
    [Show full text]