DOCSLIB.ORG

Risk Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Part A BAS 310 62 I Registration Report –Central Zone National Assessment – STORANET Germany Page 1 of 22 REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management Product code: BAS 310 62 I (STORANET) Active Substance: Alpha-cypermethrin 1.57 g/kg or 100 mg per net m2 COUNTRY: Germany Central Zone Zonal Rapporteur Member State: Germany NATIONAL ASSESSMENT Applicant: BASF SE Date: June 2014 Applicant: BASF SE Evaluator: DE Date: 12/06/2014 Part A BAS 310 62 I Draft Registration Report – Central Zone National Assessment - Germany Page 2 of 22 Table of Contents PART A – Risk Management 4 1 Details of the application 4 1.1 Application background 4 1.2 Annex I inclusion 5 1.3 Regulatory approach 5 1.4 Data protection claims 5 1.5 Letters of Access 5 2 Details of the authorisation 6 2.1 Product identity 6 2.2 Classification and labelling 6 2.2.1 Classification and labelling under Directive 99/45/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 6 2.2.2 R and S phrases under Regulation (EU) No 547/2011 7 2.2.3 Other phrases 7 2.2.3.1 Restrictions linked to the PPP 7 2.3 Product uses 9 3 Risk management 11 3.1 Reasoned statement of the overall conclusions taken in accordance with the Uniform Principles 11 3.1.1 Physical and chemical properties (Part B, Section 1, Points 2 and 4) 11 3.1.2 Methods of analysis (Part B, Section 2, Point 5) 11 3.1.2.1 Analytical method for the formulation (Part B, Section 2, Point 5.2) 11 3.1.2.2 Analytical methods for residues (Part B, Section 2, Points 5.3 – 5.8) 12 3.1.3.1 Acute Toxicity (Part B, Section 3, Point 7.1) 12 3.1.3.2 Operator Exposure (Part B, Section 3, Point 7.3) 12 3.1.3.3 Bystander Exposure (Part B, Section 3, Point 7.4) 13 Applicant: BASF SE Evaluator: Germany Date12/06/2014 Part A BAS 310 62 I Draft Registration Report – Central Zone National Assessment - Germany Page 3 of 22 3.1.3.4 Worker Exposure (Part B, Section 3, Point 7.5) 13 3.1.4 Residues and Consumer Exposure (Part B, Section 4, Point 8) 14 3.1.4.1 Residues (Part B, Section 4, Points 8.3 and 8.7) 14 3.1.4.2 Consumer exposure (Part B, Section 4, Point 8.10) 14 3.1.6 Ecotoxicology (Part B, Section 6, Point 10) 17 3.1.6.1 Effects on Terrestrial Vertebrates (Part B, Section 6, Points 10.1 and 10.3) 17 3.1.6.2 Effects on Aquatic Species (Part B, Section 6, Point 10.2) 17 3.1.6.3 Effects on Bees and Other Arthropod Species (Part B, Section 6, Points 10.4 and 10.5) 18 3.1.6.4 Effects on Earthworms and Other Soil Macro-organisms (Part B, Section 6, Point 10.6) 19 3.1.6.5 Effects on organic matter breakdown (Part B, Section 6, Point 10.6) 19 3.1.6.6 Effects on Soil Non-target Micro-organisms (Part B, Section 6, Point 10.7) 19 3.1.6.7 Assessment of Potential for Effects on Other Non-target Organisms (Flora and Fauna) (Part B, Section 6, Point 10.8) 19 3.1.7 Efficacy (Part B, Section 7, Point 8) 20 3.3 Further information to permit a decision to be made or to support a review of the conditions and restrictions associated with the authorisation 21 Appendix 1 – Copy of the product authorisation 22 Appendix 2 – Copy of the product label 22 Appendix 3 – Letter of Access 22 Applicant: BASF SE Evaluator: Germany Date12/06/2014 Part A BAS 310 62 I Registration Report –Central Zone National Assessment – STORANET Germany Page 4 of 22 PART A – Risk Management This document describes the acceptable use conditions required for the registration of BAS 310 62 I (STORANET) containing alpha cypermethrin in Germany. This evaluation is required subsequent to the inclusion of alpha cypermethrin on Annex 1. The risk assessment conclusions are based on the information, data and assessments provided in Registration Report, Part B Sections 1-7 and Part C and where appropriate the addendum for Germany. The information, data and assessments provided in Registration Report, Parts B includes assessment of further data or information as required at national registration by the EU review. It also includes assessment of data and information relating to BAS 310 62 I (STORANET) where that data has not been considered in the EU review. Otherwise assessments for the safe use of BAS 310 62 I (STORANET) have been made using endpoints agreed in the EU review of alpha cypermethrin. This document describes the specific conditions of use and labelling required for Germany for the registration of BAS 310 62 I (STORANET). Appendix 1 of this document provides a copy of the final product authorisation Germany. Appendix 2 of this document is a copy of the approved product label for Germany The submitted draft product label has been checked by the competent authority. The applicant is requested to amend the product label in accordance with the decisions made by the competent authority. The final version of the label has to fulfil the requirements according to Article 16 of Directive 91/414/EEC. Appendix 3 of this document contains copies of the letters of access to the protected data / third party data that was needed for evaluation of the formulation. Letter(s) of access is/are classified as confidential and, thus, are not attached to this document. 1 Details of the application 1.1 Application background This application was submitted by BASF SE on 27 February 2012. The application was for approval of BAS 310 62 I (STORANET), a long lasting insecticide net containing 1.57 g/kg or 100 mg per m2 net alpha-cypermethrin for use as an insecticide (net) against bark beetles, longhorn beetles and jewel beetles in hard- and softwood logs stored in forestry. Applicant: BASF SE Evaluator: DE Date: 12/06/2014 Part A BAS 310 62 I Draft Registration Report – Central Zone National Assessment - Germany Page 5 of 22 1.2 Annex I inclusion Alpha-cypermethrin Alpha-cypermethrin was included on Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC on 1 March 2005 under Inclusion Directive 2004/58/EC and is approved according to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and implemented under Regulation (EU) No 540/2011. Only uses as insecticide may be authorised. The Annex I Inclusion Directive for alpha-cypermethrin (2004/58/EC) provides specific provisions under Part B which need to be considered by the applicant in the preparation of their submission and by the MS prior to granting an authorisation. For the implementation of the uniform principles of Annex VI, the conclusions of the review report on the alpha-cypermethrin, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 13 February 2004, shall be taken into account. In this overall assessment: - Member States must pay particular attention to the protection of aquatic organisms, bees and non-target arthropods and must ensure that the conditions of authorisation include risk mitigation measures. - Member States must pay particular attention to the operator safety and must ensure that the conditions of authorisation include appropriate protective measures. These concerns were all addressed in the submission. 1.3 Regulatory approach To obtain approval the product BAS 310 62 I (STORANET) must meet the conditions of Annex I inclusion and be supported by dossiers satisfying the requirements of Annex II and Annex III, with an assessment to Uniform Principles, using Annex I agreed end-points. This application was submitted in order to allow the first approval of this product in Germany in accordance with the above. 1.4 Data protection claims Where protection of data is being claimed for information supporting registration of STORANET, it is indicated in the reference lists in Appendix 1 of the Registration Report, part B, sections 1, 2, 4 – 7 and Part C. 1.5 Letters of Access Data access has been proven. BASF provided own data. So a letter of access is not necessary. Applicant: BASF SE Evaluator: Germany Date12/06/2014 Part A BAS 310 62 I Draft Registration Report – Central Zone National Assessment - Germany Page 6 of 22 2 Details of the authorisation 2.1 Product identity Product Name BAS 310 62 I; STORANET Authorization Number 007598-00/00 (for registration) Function insecticide (net) Applicant BASF SE Composition alpha-cypermethrin 1.57 g/kg or 100 mg per m2 net Formulation type Long lasting insecticide net [Code: LN] Packaging PE-bag (thickness 120 µm) net dimensions: 8 x 12,5 m, 0,8 x 20 m and 10 x 20 m, roll (8 x 100 m) 2.2 Classification and labelling 2.2.1 Classification and labelling under Directive 99/45/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 The following is proposed in accordance with Directive 99/45/EC in combination with the latest classification and labelling guidance under Directive 67/548/EEC and according to the criteria given in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008: C&L according to Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC Hazard symbols: N Indications of danger: Dangerous for the environment Risk phrases: R50/53 Safety phrases: S24, S35, S57 Additional labelling phrases: To avoid risks to man and the environment, comply with the instructions for use.
Recommended publications
  • Elytra Reduction May Affect the Evolution of Beetle Hind Wings

    Elytra Reduction May Affect the Evolution of Beetle Hind Wings

    Zoomorphology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-017-0388-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings Jakub Goczał1 · Robert Rossa1 · Adam Tofilski2 Received: 21 July 2017 / Revised: 31 October 2017 / Accepted: 14 November 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Beetles are one of the largest and most diverse groups of animals in the world. Conversion of forewings into hardened shields is perceived as a key adaptation that has greatly supported the evolutionary success of this taxa. Beetle elytra play an essential role: they minimize the influence of unfavorable external factors and protect insects against predators. Therefore, it is particularly interesting why some beetles have reduced their shields. This rare phenomenon is called brachelytry and its evolution and implications remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we focused on rare group of brachelytrous beetles with exposed hind wings. We have investigated whether the elytra loss in different beetle taxa is accompanied with the hind wing shape modification, and whether these changes are similar among unrelated beetle taxa. We found that hind wings shape differ markedly between related brachelytrous and macroelytrous beetles. Moreover, we revealed that modifications of hind wings have followed similar patterns and resulted in homoplasy in this trait among some unrelated groups of wing-exposed brachelytrous beetles. Our results suggest that elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings. Keywords Beetle · Elytra · Evolution · Wings · Homoplasy · Brachelytry Introduction same mechanism determines wing modification in all other insects, including beetles. However, recent studies have The Coleoptera order encompasses almost the quarter of all provided evidence that formation of elytra in beetles is less currently known animal species (Grimaldi and Engel 2005; affected by Hox gene than previously expected (Tomoyasu Hunt et al.
  • Host Plant Volatiles for Herbivores: a Bypass-Trophic Signal

    Host Plant Volatiles for Herbivores: a Bypass-Trophic Signal

    Inhibition of Predator Attraction to Kairomones by Non- Host Plant Volatiles for Herbivores: A Bypass-Trophic Signal Qing-He Zhang¤, Fredrik Schlyter* Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden Abstract Background: Insect predators and parasitoids exploit attractive chemical signals from lower trophic levels as kairomones to locate their herbivore prey and hosts. We hypothesized that specific chemical cues from prey non-hosts and non-habitats, which are not part of the trophic chain, are also recognized by predators and would inhibit attraction to the host/prey kairomone signals. To test our hypothesis, we studied the olfactory physiology and behavior of a predaceous beetle, Thanasimus formicarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Cleridae), in relation to specific angiosperm plant volatiles, which are non-host volatiles (NHV) for its conifer-feeding bark beetle prey. Methodology/Principal Findings: Olfactory detection in the clerid was confirmed by gas chromatography coupled to electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) for a subset of NHV components. Among NHV, we identified two strongly antennally active molecules, 3-octanol and 1-octen-3-ol. We tested the potential inhibition of the combination of these two NHV on the walking and flight responses of the clerid to known kairomonal attractants such as synthetic mixtures of bark beetle (Ips spp.) aggregation pheromone components (cis-verbenol, ipsdienol, and E-myrcenol) combined with conifer (Picea and Pinus spp.) monoterpenes (a-pinene, terpinolene, and D3-carene). There was a strong inhibitory effect, both in the laboratory (effect size d = 23.2, walking bioassay) and in the field (d = 21.0, flight trapping). This is the first report of combining antennal detection (GC-EAD) and behavioral responses to identify semiochemical molecules that bypass the trophic system, signaling habitat information rather than food related information.
  • Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes

    Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes

    Bugs and Beasties of the Western Rhodopes (a photoguide to some lesser-known species) by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser [email protected] Yagodina At Honeyguide, we aim to help you experience the full range of wildlife in the places we visit. Generally we start with birds, flowers and butterflies, but we don’t ignore 'other invertebrates'. In the western Rhodopes they are just so abundant and diverse that they are one of the abiding features of the area. While simply experiencing this diversity is sufficient for some, as naturalists many of us want to know more, and in particular to be able to give names to what we see. Therein lies the problem: especially in eastern Europe, there are few books covering the invertebrates in any comprehensive way. Hence this photoguide – while in no way can this be considered an ‘eastern Chinery’, it at least provides a taster of the rich invertebrate fauna you may encounter, based on a couple of Honeyguide holidays we have led in the western Rhodopes during June. We stayed most of the time in a tight area around Yagodina, and almost anything we saw could reasonably be expected to be seen almost anywhere around there in the right habitat. Most of the photos were taken in 2014, with a few additional ones from 2012. While these creatures have found their way into the lists of the holiday reports, relatively few have been accompanied by photos. We have attempted to name the species depicted, using the available books and the vast resources of the internet, but in many cases it has not been possible to be definitive and the identifications should be treated as a ‘best fit’.
  • Functional Evolution of a Bark Beetle Odorant Receptor Clade Detecting Monoterpenoids of Different Ecological Origins

    Functional Evolution of a Bark Beetle Odorant Receptor Clade Detecting Monoterpenoids of Different Ecological Origins

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.28.424525; this version posted December 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Functional evolution of a bark beetle odorant receptor clade detecting monoterpenoids of different ecological origins Xiao-Qing Hou1, Jothi Kumar Yuvaraj1, Rebecca E. Roberts1, C. Rikard Unelius2, Christer Löfstedt1, Martin N. Andersson1* 1Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden 2 Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden *Corresponding author: Martin N. Andersson Department of Biology, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62 Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Phone: +46-(0)462229344 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.28.424525; this version posted December 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Insects detect odors using an array of odorant receptors (ORs), which may expand through gene duplication. How specificities evolve and new functions arise in related ORs within a species remain poorly investigated. We addressed this question by functionally characterizing ORs from the Eurasian spruce bark beetle Ips typographus, in which antennal detection and behavioral responses to pheromones, volatiles from host and non-host trees, and fungal symbionts are well described.
  • Combining Multiple Statistical Methods to Evaluate the Performance of Process-Based Vegetation Models Across Three Forest Stands

    Combining Multiple Statistical Methods to Evaluate the Performance of Process-Based Vegetation Models Across Three Forest Stands

    Cent. Eur. For. J. 63 (2017) 153–172 DOI: 10.1515/forj-2017-0025 ORIGINAL PAPER http://www.nlcsk.sk/fj/ Combining multiple statistical methods to evaluate the performance of process-based vegetation models across three forest stands Joanna A. Horemans1*, Alexandra Henrot2, Christine Delire3, Chris Kollas4, Petra Lasch-Born4, Christopher Reyer4, Felicitas Suckow4, Louis François2, and Reinhart Ceulemans1 1Centre of Excellence PLECO, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B–2610 Wilrijk, Belgium 2Unité de Modélisation du Climat et des Cycles Biogéochimiques (UMCCB), Université de Liège, Allée du Six Août 17, B–4000 Liège, Belgium 3Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Unité Mixte de Recherches UMR3589, CNRS Météo-France, F–31000 Toulouse, France 4Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg A31, D–14473 Potsdam, Germany Abstract Process-based vegetation models are crucial tools to better understand biosphere-atmosphere exchanges and eco- physiological responses to climate change. In this contribution the performance of two global dynamic vegetation models, i.e. CARAIB and ISBACC, and one stand-scale forest model, i.e. 4C, was compared to long-term observed net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) time series from eddy covariance monitoring stations at three old-grown European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest stands. Residual analysis, wavelet analysis and singular spectrum analysis were used beside conventional scalar statistical measures to assess model performance with the aim of defining future targets for model improvement. We found that the most important errors for all three models occurred at the edges of the observed NEE distribution and the model errors were correlated with environmental variables on a daily scale.
  • A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015

    A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015

    A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block
  • Integrating Cultural Tactics Into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests1

    Integrating Cultural Tactics Into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests1

    DA United States US Department of Proceedings --z:;;-;;; Agriculture Forest Service Integrating Cultural Tactics into Northeastern Forest Experiment Station the Management of Bark Beetle General Technical Report NE-236 and Reforestation Pests Edited by: Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team J.C. Gregoire A.M. Liebhold F.M. Stephen K.R. Day S.M.Salom Vallombrosa, Italy September 1-3, 1996 Most of the papers in this publication were submitted electronically and were edited to achieve a uniform format and type face. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. Some participants did not submit papers so they have not been included. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Forest Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Remarks about pesticides appear in some technical papers contained in these proceedings. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by State and Federal Law. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agencies. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife - if they are not handled and applied properly.
  • List of Subspecies, Species and Genera, Described by Ryszard Haitlinger

    List of Subspecies, Species and Genera, Described by Ryszard Haitlinger

    List of subspecies, species and genera, described by Ryszard Haitlinger 1. Spinturnix mystacinus brandti, 1978, Poland, from Myotis brandti 2. Acanthophthirius polonicus 1978, Poland, from Myotis dasycnene 3. A. serotinus 1978 Poland (= A. serotinus Fain) 4. A. silesiacus 1978 , Poland, M. andegavinus 5. A. sudeticus 1978, Poland, M. natterer (= A. namurensis Fain), 6. Schoutedenichia romanica 1978, Ropmania , from Spermophilus citellus 7. Charletonia tamarae 1984, Greece (= C. bucephalia Beron 8. Hauptmannia rudaensis 1986 (= Rudaemannia rudaensis), Poland. plants 9. Hauptmannia kazimierae 1986, Poland, plants 10. H. wratislaviensis 1986, Poland, plants 11. H. stanislavae, 1986, Polamd, plants 12. H. silesiacus 1986, Poland, plants 13. Charletonia huensis 1986, Vietnam, plants 14. C. danangensis 1986, Vietnam, plants 15. C. jolantae 1986, Vietnam, Ortrhoptera (C. volzi ) 16. Trichoecius widawaensis 1096, Poland, Apodemus agrarius 17. Stenopolipus julii 1986, Vietnam, 18. Psorergates polonicus 1986, Poland, Microtus subterraneus 19. Leptus zbelutkaicus 1987, Poland,plants (= L. ignotus = L. molochinus) 20. L. (L.) mariae 1987, Poland, plants 21. L. (L.) clethrionomydis 1987, Poland, Myodes glareolus 22. L. (L.) aldonae 1987, Madagascar, plants 23. L. (L.) maranaensis 1987, Madagascar, plants 24. Charletonia tatianae 1987, Madagascar, plants 25. C. edytae 1987, Madagascar, Odonata 26. C. iwonae 1987, Madagascae, Lepidoptera 27. C. arlrettae 1987, Madagascar, Neuroptera 28. C. dorotae 1987, Madagascar, Orthoptera 29. C. justynae 1987, Madagascar, Orthoptera 30. C. alarobiensis 1987, Madagascar, Orthoptera 31. C. agatae 1987, Madagascar, plants 32. Psorergates olawaensis 1987, Poland, Crocidura suaveolens 33. Hauptmannia pseudolongicollis 1987, Poland, plants (- Abrolophus quisquiliaris) 34. Erythraeus (Erythraeus) jowitae 1987, Poland, plants 35. E. (E.) gertrudae 1987, Poland, plants 36. E. (E.) elwirae 1987, Poland, plants 37.
  • Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci PÍrodov Decká Fakulta Katedra Zoologie a Ornitologická Laborato 

    Univerzita Palackého V Olomouci PÍrodov Decká Fakulta Katedra Zoologie a Ornitologická Laborato 

    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PÍRODOV DECKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ZOOLOGIE A ORNITOLOGICKÁ LABORATO Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) DOKTORSKÁ DISERTA NÍ PRÁCE Josef Kašák Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Olomouc 2015 Bibliografická identifikace: Jméno a p íjmení autora: Josef Kašák Název práce: Význam a ochrana bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku z hlediska biodiverzity brouk (Coleoptera) Typ práce: doktorská diserta ní práce Pracovišt : Katedra zoologie a ornitologická laborato , P írodov decká fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci Vedoucí práce: doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Starý, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Tomáš Kuras, Ph.D. Studijní program: P1527 Biologie Studijní obor: Zoologie Rok obhajoby práce: 2015 Abstrakt: Biodiverzita jako variabilita života poskytuje lidské spole nosti adu nezbytných zdroj , ekosystémových služeb a p edstavuje také významnou kulturní hodnotu. Na druhé stran však dochází sou asn k jejímu ochuzování v souvislosti s rozvojem lidské spole nosti. Z pohledu ochrany p írody se proto horské ekosystémy adí mezi jedno z nejcenn jších a nejohrožen jších prost edí v globálním m ítku. V rámci p edložené doktorské práce byly studovány vybrané potenciáln významné antropické vlivy na biodiverzitu horských bezlesí Hrubého Jeseníku prost ednictvím modelové bioindika ní skupiny brouk (Coleoptera). V prostoru primárního bezlesí arkto- alpinní tundry byl studován vliv sjezdových tratí a invazivní d eviny borovice kle e ( Pinus mugo ) na spole enstva brouk . Na území sekundárních bezlesí podhorských luk a pastvin byl hodnocen vliv zem dlského hospoda ení na brouky a další bezobratlé. Studium vlivu lyža ského areálu prokázalo, že p estože jsou sjezdové trat v alpínské zón zájmového území provozovány zp sobem šetrným k vegetaci, tak pr kazn m ní pvodní spole enstva epigeických brouk .
  • Communities of Epigeic Beetles in Tree Line

    Communities of Epigeic Beetles in Tree Line

    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 35, No. 4, p. 340–349, 2016 DOI:10.1515/eko-2016-0027 COMMUNITIES OF EPIGEIC BEETLES IN TREE LINE FROM MONTANE SPRUCE FOREST TO SECONDARY MEADOW IN THE DIFFERENT STAGE OF THE FOREST DECLINE IN THE AREA OF MODRAVA (BOHEMIAN FOREST, CZECH REPUBLIC) JAROSLAV BOHÁČ, KAREL MATĚJKA Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] IDS, Na Komořsku 2175/2a, 143 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic Abstract Boháč J., Matějka K.: Communities of epigeic beetles in tree line from montane spruce forest to secondary meadow in the different stage of the forest decline in the area of Modrava (Bohemian forest, Czech Republic). Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 35, No. 4, p. 340–349, 2016. Communities of epigeic beetles were studied using pitfall trapping on 10 plots with the different stage of decline and clear-cut plots without coarse woody debris. Species richness (number of all species, S), total species diversity as the Shannon–Wiener’s index (H) and equitability (e) were calcu- lated in the DBreleve. The Ward’s method of hierarchical agglomerative classification with Euclidean distance was used for the differentiation of the communities on the plots. Species data for this analyse were represented by logarithm-transformed activities [log(x+1)]. The single-factor analysis of vari- ance (ANOVA) was used for statistical testing of differences in structural parameters (e.g. species richness and diversity) amongst distinguished groups of the plots. The species diversity and activity differs on glades without trees and coarse woody debris.
  • Ekológia 25(Suppl. 3): 41-52

    Ekológia 25(Suppl. 3): 41-52

    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 25, Supplement 3/2006, p. 41–52 THE IMPACT OF TOURISM AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT IN THE ŠUMAVA NATIONAL PARK AND THE ŠUMAVA LANDSCAPE PROTECTED AREA ON THE EPIGEIC BEETLE COMMUNITIES JAROSLAV BOHÁČ1, VLADAN ŠRUBAŘ1, KAREL MATĚJKA2, JAKUB ŠŤASTNÝ1 1 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Agriculture, Dep.of Agroecology, Section of Landscape Management, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, The Czech Republic, e-mail:[email protected] 2 INFODATASYS, Komořanská, 100 05 Praha, The Czech Republic Abstract Boháč J., Šrubař V., Matějka K., Šťastný J.: The impact of tourism and landscape management in the Šumava National Park and the Šumava Landscape Protected Area on the epigeic beetle communities. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 25, Supplement 3/2006, p. 41–52. The effect of tourism and various landscape management on the beetle communities were investigated using pitfall trapping in the montane area of the Central Europe (Šumava National Park and Landscape Protected Area). The pitfall traps were arranged on plots on the left and right side of the Lipno reservoir with the different anthropogenic pressure – the higher man pressure was traditionally on the left side of the Lipno reservoir. Beetle communities of the Norway spruce forest, ski trail, golf course, cultural meadow, parking plot, dam shore and the wetland were studied. The number of species discovered by pitfall trapping was lowest on the plots strongly affected by human activities (golf course and parking place). The skiing had no negative effect on epigeic beetles. Some species typical for open biotopes migrated to the ski trail and the forest species present at the edge of the forest and ski slope.
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207

    Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207

    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.