River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway Corridor Management Plan (CMP)
January 2009
Prepared by:
The River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway Corridor Advocacy Group and Corridor Management Entity
In association with:
TranSystems
&
EMS Associates As Secretary of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the signature below indicates the approval and endorsement of the Corridor Management Plan (CMP) and this corridor for designation as a Florida Scenic Highway. FDOT approval of this management plan represents our agreement to serve in a partnership with the Corridor Management Entity (CME) to preserve, enhance, and maintain the designated scenic highway corridor. We recognize the grass roots initiative and strong local support for this corridor demonstrated by the communities involved in the preparation of this management plan. This corridor management plan acknowledges that the designated corridor will be subject to the requirements of the Section 1046 (c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) which added a new subsection(s) to 23 United States Code (USC) 131 precluding outdoor advertising on designated scenic highways, and the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Act. I hereby designate this corridor as a Florida Scenic Highway.
______Stephanie Kopelousos Secretary, Florida Department of Transportation
Comments from the Scenic Highways Advisory Committee (SHAC) Eligibility Review Meeting
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 30, 2007
TO: Pat Evans, Shawn Hartzer, Robert Jones, Jerrie Lindsey, Kerri Post, Brian Telfair
FROM: Mariano Berrios, Florida Scenic Highways Program, State Coordinator
CC: Bob Crim, Garry Balogh, Kristee Booth, Glenn Burns, Lynne Marie Whately, Andy Nicol, Clint Eliason
SUBJECT: Scenic Highways Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – October 18, 2007 Eligibility Application Review: River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway
A Scenic Highways Advisory Committee (SHAC) meeting was held on Thursday, October 18, 2007 from 1:30pm – 2:30pm at the Burns Building – Suwannee Room in Tallahassee, Florida. The purpose of the meeting was to review and provide a recommendation regarding the River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway Eligibility application.
INTRODUCTION
The meeting opened with the Scenic Highway Advisory Committee (SHAC) introducing themselves. SHAC attendees included Pat Evans, DEP; Shawn Hartzer, Department of Agriculture-Forestry (via phone); Robert Jones, DOS; Jerrie Lindsey, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; and Brian Telfair, FHWA. Also in attendance was Mariano Berrios, State Scenic Highways Coordinator. Participating via tele-conference were Andy Nicol, Clint Eliason, Garry Balogh, Kristee Booth, Glenn Burns, and Renee Tallevast.
Mr. Berrios thanked the attendees for coming to the meeting and gave an overview of the meeting agenda.
DISCUSSION OF THE RIVER OF LAKES HERITAGE CORRIDOR SCENIC HIGHWAY ELIGIBILTY APPLICATION The 120 miles that make up the Candidate River of Lakes Heritage Corridor is unlike many other scenic highway corridors. It is comprised of a network of federal, state, and local roadways that traverse Volusia County through the towns of Deltona, Enterprise, Debary, Orange City, Lake Helen, Deland, Glenwood, Deleon Springs, Barberville, Pierson, and Seville.
The following comments/recommendations were provided by the SHAC for consideration and incorporation into the River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Designation Application / Corridor Management Plan (CMP):
1. The application does not present archaeological resources in detail. If these resources are not the resources the group will “hang their hat on,” then minimal, if any, reference needs to be made. 2. Some recreational resources are presented as significant resources although they are not directly on or easily accessible to the corridor. Please be sure to address this in the CMP. 3. If possible, address the numerous birding opportunities along the corridor. 4. Some of the maps were not very legible. Make sure all resource maps relate directly to the corridor.
The SHAC completed their Evaluation of Applicant Corridor forms and voted 6-0 in favor of this corridor as a Candidate Florida Scenic Highway.
NEXT SHAC MEETING The next SHAC meeting will be held on February 20, 2008 at 1:30 pm.
ADJOURNMENT Mr. Berrios thanked everyone for coming and for his/her efforts with the Florida Scenic Highways Program. The meeting concluded at 2:00 pm.
Responses to SHAC Comments 1. The CMP Lists and describes all resources along the corridor, and displays all of them on the resource maps. 2. All recreational resources are either directly adjacent to or easily accessible off of the River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway. 3. Some of the recreational, birding opportunities along the corridor are listed and described in the Intrinsic Resource Section of the CMP. 4. All maps have been redone for the designation phase, all should be legible and directly relate to the corridor. Executive Summary of Action Plan
This Executive Summary of the Action Plan describes a quick view of the plans for the corridor. Section 14 of the CMP shows the complete Action Plan with time tables, possible funding sources, and responsible parties.
Transportation Planning/Safety Actions Roads and Wildlife. Raise awareness of wildlife protection techniques in transportation/land development planning; Support establishment of speed zones and traffic calming measures in areas of known wildlife trails and crossings; Improve sight distance and off-road obstacles to reduce potential for wildlife road kill.
Roadway Construction. Support roadway construction and associated improvements (passing lanes, pull- off areas, parking sites) with design and scale appropriate to region; Support construction/improvements of pedestrian walkways, bicycle paths, bridges, parking, and rest areas; Promote appropriate paving/improvements to unpaved roads providing access to important intrinsic resource sites in forests, parks, and refuges.
Intersections. Identify major intersections & corridor segments that require improvement/enhancement; Improve pedestrian crossings at signalized and un-signalized locations to address safety issues.
Multimodal Transportation. Support alternative forms of transportation where appropriate (bicycles, public transit, commuter rail, etc.).
Streetscaping. Encourage improvements in streetscaping (compatible crosswalk markings, lighting, sidewalks, walkways, benches, rest areas) where possible.
Setbacks. Encourage building setbacks and landscaping closer to the roadway as a traffic-calming measure and aesthetic improvement.
Transportation Management. Improve capacity through the provision of alternative transportation facilities, and encourage parallel routes in areas of high-volume traffic congestion wherever practical to retain the character of the corridor.
Land Use/Zoning Actions Land Purchase. Support land purchases that advance intrinsic resource protection and public access.
Screening. Promote establishment of appropriate setbacks and landscape screening to protect scenic views.
Easements. Identify and advocate conservation easements or use other tools for protection of resources.
Utilities Actions Power Lines. Promote relocation of utility poles where they obstruct or visually impact scenic views or resource access along the corridor. Water Treatment. Encourage central sewage, advanced wastewater treatment, and improved septic systems; Improve stormwater control practices.
Conservation/Beautification Actions Native Species. Conduct inventories of species and promote use of native plants/trees in landscaping and removal of exotic/invasive species; Support planting of native trees and plants that provide wildlife food and forage to expand opportunities for wildlife habitat and viewing.
Native Wildflowers. Encourage planting of wildflowers along rights of way, in medians, and adjacent to public and private properties; Support coordination of mowing along rights-of-way to protect wildflowers, promote natural reseeding, and expand access for butterflies, birds, and other wildlife.
Ordinances. Encourage adoption of ordinances on landscaping, treeplanting, tree canopies, and protection that support beautification efforts.
Landscaping. Promote beautification /landscaping of intersections and use of screening to hide utilities from public view; support improved landscaping and reestablishing historic landscaping.
Clean-Up. Support consistent litter removal of roadways and rights of way along corridor; Identify segments of the corridor currently not designated as Adopt-a-Road corridors for litter removal; Build on existing efforts to improve working waterfronts and tourist observation/access; Work with appropriate entities to develop attractive public facilities.
Water Resource Protection. Support and develop measures that aid in the protection of the regions water resources; Encourage water use studies; minimize future alterations of water resources and connectivity.
Development Plans. Ensure that future and existing developments consider the Corridor Vision when designing and laying out their development; street front design should include Corridor Vision considerations; update and improve corridor frontages to blend with the character of the corridor; develop an incentive program for adhering to Corridor Vision.
Comprehensive Planning. Ensure that the Corridor Vision is included in the local governments' Comprehensive Plans; Work with local governments to identify areas of their Comp Plans that achieve the Corridor's Goals, Objectives, and Strategies; Review the local Comp Plans on a regular basis.
Green/Eco-Enviro Friendly Design. Encourage "green" design practices.
Public Access Actions Sites. Collaborate on plans for areas in need of improved public access.
View. Seek ways, including possible construction of platforms/observation towers, to open/improve scenic views; Work with others on the preservation of scenic views and public access to rivers and viewsheds; Create additional viewshed areas through selective vegetation clearing; Promote public access to waterfront areas and docks for visitors.
Handicap Access. Where possible, provide handicap access to resources and interpretation sites. Trail Development Actions Connectivity. Improve connectivity between and among existing trail networks; Encourage enhancement projects to improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and facilities; Support the establishment of non- motorized greenways/habitat corridors to connect public lands along the corridor.
Bicycle/Hiking. Help develop and, where possible, expand the existing network of bicycle and hiking trails; Encourage improvement and expansion of bicycle and hiking trails on public lands.
Equestrian. Promote development of equestrian trails along the corridor as well as related stables and support facilities.
Trail Heads. Help evaluate public staging areas at trail heads and other convenient locations to facilitate public access to trail networks.
Tourism/Recreation Facilities Actions Historic Sites. Promote tours of historic sites along the corridor.
Community Tours. Encourage the creation of community tours along the corridor to highlight the regions resources; develop walking tours through the cities as well as driving tours along the entire corridor.
Agri-Tourism. Promote agri-tourism opportunities and reward programs along the corridor for businesses such as ferneries, citrus, organics, etc.
Accommodations. Encourage construction and improvement of public restrooms and picnic sites; Encourage establishment of new accommodations, such as B&Bs, as well as associated shops and restaurants.
Recreation Sites. Explore ways to encourage greater use of recreation areas throughout the corridor for boating, fishing, picnicking, and other outdoor opportunities.
Historic/Cultural Preservation Actions Inventory. Support completion of an inventory of major historic structures and sites, defining those requiring further designation, protection, and/or improvement.
Improvement. Cooperate with public and private owners on the restoration of selected older buildings for tourist use; Encourage appropriate repair, restoration, upgrading, and painting of homes and buildings in historic districts and create rewards programs. Support the preservation efforts of those properties listed on the Volusia County Historic Preservation Board's 15-Most Endangered Historical Properties List
Acquisitions of Historic Property. Acquire historic properties/land along the corridor.
Historic Designation. Encourage and seek national and local historic designations along the corridor where applicable; work with local communities to improve and promote designated historic sites. Interpretation/Signage Actions Themed Signage. Establish Scenic Highway-themed signing plan for wildflower sites; Encourage posting of more widespread, attractive, and imaginative signage about the presence and value of wildlife in the region; Establish standard Scenic Highway-themed signage, interpretation, and public information.
Local Signage. Encourage incentives/opportunities for local signage that meet business and directional needs while helping to maintain a distinctive "Heritage" atmosphere and rural character wherever appropriate.
Way Finding. Improve signage for, and public access to, attractions, parking, and facilities; Improve directional signage for access to intrinsic resources.
Non-Conforming. Encourage local governments to remove non-conforming and non-permitted signs.
Consistency. Facilitate planning of interpretive sites, encouraging consistently themed logos, designs, and styles for the corridor
Conservation Education. Encourage improved interpretation and public information on ecological and economic values and education; educate property owners and visitors on the importance of vegetation management to help minimize pollution runoffs to surrounding natural areas, such as rivers and lakes; improve and promote conservation preservation practices with residents and businesses.
Displays. Provide improved and expanded interpretive displays; Provide interpretation of smaller, less known historic sites; Provide interpretation of the history of corridor communities.
Interpretive Sites. Explore uses of vacant land/properties for use as interpretive sites; Improve and/or establish observation points in key resource areas.
Gateways. Establish "gateways" and/or attractive welcome signs at entry points; Establish information centers/welcome centers at key points along the corridor.
Inventory of Existing Signage. Inventory the existing signage along the corridor; update the corridor signage inventory annually (or as needed).
Promotion Actions Activities. Help educate private property owners/traveling public on the desirability and value of wildlife- friendly features; Promote the arts community within the region; highlight the opportunity for nature photography; promote the wildflower community and events along the corridor, and promote the corridor's historical sites and architecture.
Publications. Encourage more widespread dissemination and the use of guidebooks and other marketing/promotional materials; Promote the corridor resources through brochures, maps and in Scenic Highway collaterals. Create a byway brochure.
Events/Festivals. Coordinate promotion of all Corridor events and festivals and maintain a common calendar; Encourage establishment of new festivals that celebrate the cultural heritage and resources of the corridor. Marketing. Promote family-friendly and pet-friendly character of the corridor and its major attractions; provide information about interesting sites located off the corridor, but easily accessible from it.
Internet. Promote the Corridor through existing and new internet-based applications.
Economic Development Actions Shopping. Work with local merchants and the business community to achieve a wider spectrum of shopping opportunities along the corridor.
Training/Mentoring. Encourage training programs to improve skills for nature and heritage based tourism; Collaborate on mentoring programs for new tourism entrepreneurs such as agri-tourism industries and accommodators such as B&Bs.
National Scenic Byways Program. Work with the National Scenic Byways Program as needed; Seek designation as a National Scenic Byway or All-American Road.
Preserve America Program. Encourage communities to pursue a Preserve America Designation.
Administration Actions Monitoring/Reporting. Monitor and periodically adjust the Action Plan to reflect current realities and opportunities, and report to FDOT on problems and progress in a timely manner.
Fundraising. Develop fundraising plan as well as events and activities; work with the communities to raise funds for the Action Plan items and to achieve the Corridor Vision; seek out grant opportunities; seek partnering opportunities for funding.
Sunshine Law. Conduct meetings that abide by the Florida Sunshine Law to encourage transparency and public participation.
Coordination Actions Regional Collaboration. Encourage coordination of regional transportation planning on significant projects; Encourage participation of regional entities and management agencies with multi-jurisdictional resources on all corridor-wide projects.
Master Plan. Develop a corridor Master Plan to address goals for landscaping, signing, trail networks, scenic viewing areas, public staging areas, interpretation, wildflower sites, and gateways.
Communication. Develop a website to provide status information, contacts, and announcements of upcoming events and activities.
Partnerships. Involve interested and affected stakeholders in the implementation strategy; Build formal and informal public/private partnerships to implement individual action items.
Education. Provide information to the traveling public to educate them about the corridor's resources; work with the educational community to develop educational opportunities for Scenic Highway awareness; partner with local schools; develop a media relations campaign to educate the public about the corridor; establish a speaker's bureau.
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway Corridor Management Plan
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction to the Corridor Management Plan ...... 1 2.0 Background Conditions Analysis ...... 3 3.0 Intrinsic Resource Assessment and Universal Criteria ...... 68 4.0 Corridor Vision ...... 139 5.0 Goals, Objectives and Strategies ...... 140 6.0 Corridor Story ...... 150 7.0 Corridor Management Entity ...... 158 8.0 Community Participation Program ...... 160 9.0 Local Support ...... 169 10.0 Protection Techniques ...... 170 11.0 Funding and Promotion ...... 184 12.0 Relationship to Comprehensive Plans ...... 188 13.0 Partnerships and Agreements ...... 231 14.0 Action Plan ...... 235 Definitions and Acronyms ...... 267
Appendix A: Corridor Impressions Survey (CIS) Appendix B: Letters of Support Appendix C: CME Bylaws and Agreements Appendix D: Sign Regulations Appendix E: Comprehensive Plans Appendix F: Community Profiles Appendix G: Volusia County 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Appendix H: Field Inventory Appendix I: Cultural Events Appendix J: Detailed Crash Data Appendix K: Listed Species in Volusia County Appendix L: Brochures Appendix M: Media Coverage Appendix N: Sample CAG Agendas and Minutes Appendix O: Petitions of Support and Resolutions Appendix P: Straight Line Diagrams Appendix Q: Right-of-Way Widths Appendix R: Corridor Video and Presentations Appendix S: Letter of Intent and Eligibility Letter Appendix T: State Park Management Plans
Section | Table of Contents and Figures and Tables i River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan List of Figures
Figure 1: Corridor Limits ...... 4 Figure 2: Multi-Use Trails ...... 7 Figure 3: Existing Zoning Map Key ...... 9 Figure 4: Existing Zoning – Map Area #1 ...... 10 Figure 5: Existing Zoning – Map Area #2 ...... 11 Figure 6: Existing Zoning – Map Area #3 ...... 12 Figure 7: Existing Zoning – Map Area #4 ...... 13 Figure 8: Existing Zoning – Map Area #5 ...... 14 Figure 9: Outdoor Advertisements ...... 16 Figure 10: Future Land Use Map Key ...... 24 Figure 11: Future Land Use – Map Area #1 ...... 25 Figure 12: Future Land Use – Map Area #2 ...... 26 Figure 13: Future Land Use – Map Area #3 ...... 27 Figure 14: Future Land Use – Map Area #4 ...... 28 Figure 15: Future Land Use – Map Area #5 ...... 29 Figure 16: Thoroughfare Plan ...... 48 Figure 17: Five Year Road Plan Projects ...... 51 Figure 18: Master Intrinsic Resource Point Map ...... 73 Figure 19: Pierson Resource Points Map ...... 74 Figure 20: Barberville Resource Points Map ...... 75 Figure 21: East Barberville Resource Points Map ...... 76 Figure 22: DeLeon Springs Resource Points Map ...... 77 Figure 23: North DeLand Resource Points Map ...... 78 Figure 24: DeLand Resource Points Map ...... 79 Figure 25: West DeLand Resource Points Map ...... 80 Figure 26: Lake Helen Resource Points Map ...... 81 Figure 27: Orange City Resource Points Map ...... 82 Figure 28: DeBary Resource Points Map ...... 83 Figure 29: Deltona Resource Points Map ...... 84 Figure 30: South Deltona Resource Points Map ...... 85 Figure 31: East Deltona Resource Points Map ...... 86 Figure 32: Samsula Resource Points Map ...... 87 Figure 33: Conservation Lands Map ...... 122
Section | Table of Contents and Figures and Tables ii River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan List of Tables
Table 1: Corridor Limits ...... 3 Table 2: Roadway Segments and Functional Classifications ...... 5 Table 3: Summary of Right-of-Way Widths ...... 6 Table 4: Outdoor Advertisements ...... 17 Table 5: Crash Summary ...... 31 Table 6: AADT and Future LOS ...... 32 Table 7: FDOT/Volusia County MPO Planned Improvements ...... 49 Table 8: Volusia County Demographic Statistics...... 54 Table 9: Intrinsic Resource List ...... 68 Table 10: Special Cultural Events ...... 92 Table 11: Roadway Segments ...... 128 Table 12: Segment Lengths of the ROLHCSH Corridor ...... 131 Table 13: National Register of Historic Places Districts and Sites ...... 132 Table 14: Corridor Advocacy Group (CAG) Members ...... 133 Table 15: Corridor Management Entity (CME) Members ...... 137 Table 16: Action Plan ...... 236 Table 17: Responsible Parties ...... 263 Table 18: Potential Funding Sources ...... 264
Section | Table of Contents and Figures and Tables iii
Introduction to the Corridor Management Plan
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN
1.1 Statement of Purpose
The River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway (ROLHCSH) Corridor Management Plan (CMP) is intended to provide a collection of information that will assist in the preservation, promotion, interpretation, enhancement, and management of the intrinsic resources found throughout the River of Lakes Heritage Corridor. This CMP will attempt to foster economic planning and activity within the ROLHCSH communities and provide direction and foresight as to the proper course of promotion, use, and preservation of the corridor’s resources.
The unified vision and goals referenced in this CMP is a by-product of the ROLHCSH communities. This CMP is an extension of the people – the people of the ROLHCSH. The diverse goals and wishes of the many communities along the corridor have been assembled and unified in this CMP, to give a common voice that will be heard and understood by all. This unification and common ground that is assembled in this CMP will be the promoter and the protector of the River of Lakes Heritage Corridor for decades to come.
1.2 The Florida Scenic Highways Program and the National Scenic Byways Program
The Florida Scenic Highways Program is administered and managed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Environmental Management Office. The program is a grassroots collaborative effort with the National Scenic Byways Program established to help recognize, preserve and enhance selected roads throughout the State of Florida and the United States. Through this collaborative effort, the program supports the state's selected roads, promotes communities and preserves irreplaceable resources. As of December 2008 the State of Florida has two (2) National Scenic Byways and twenty-three (23) State Scenic Highways.
The National Scenic Byways Program is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Since 1992, the National Scenic Byways Program has funded 2,451 projects for state and nationally designated byway routes in 50 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation recognizes certain roads as All- American Roads or National Scenic Byways based on one or more archeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational and scenic qualities. (Source: http://www.byways.org)
Section | Introduction 1 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan The National Scenic Byways Program (NSBP) requires that a Corridor Management Plan (CMP) meet the following 14 points.
14 Points of the NSBP CMP Requirements 1. A map identifying the corridor boundaries, location, intrinsic qualities, and land uses in the corridor. 2. An assessment of the intrinsic qualities and their "context" (the areas surrounding them). 3. A strategy for maintaining and enhancing each of those intrinsic qualities. 4. The agencies, groups, and individuals who are part of the team that will carry out the plan, including a list of their specific, individual responsibilities. Also, a schedule of when and how you'll review the degree to which those responsibilities are being met. 5. A strategy of how existing development might be enhanced and new development accommodated to preserve the intrinsic qualities of your byway. 6. A plan for on-going public participation. 7. A general review of the road's safety record to locate hazards and poor design, and identify possible corrections. 8. A plan to accommodate commercial traffic while ensuring the safety of sightseers in smaller vehicles, as well as bicyclists, joggers, and pedestrians. 9. A listing and discussion of efforts to minimize anomalous intrusions on the visitor's experience of the byway. 10. Documentation of compliance with all existing local, state, and federal laws about the control of outdoor advertising. 11. A plan to make sure that the number and placement of highway signs will not get in the way of the scenery, but still be sufficient to help tourists find their way. This includes, where appropriate, signs for international tourists who may not speak English fluently. 12. Plans of how the byway will be marketed and publicized. 13. Any proposals for modifying the roadway, including an evaluation about design standards and how proposed changes may affect the byway's intrinsic qualities. 14. A description of what you plan to do to explain and interpret your byway's significant resources to visitors. (Source: NSBP Nomination Application Manual, 2008)
Section | Introduction 2 Background Conditions Analysis
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 2.0 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
A Background Assessment was conducted during the Eligibility Phase of the program for the River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway (ROLHCSH). The Background Assessment provided information on existing conditions of the highway such as a physical description of the highway corridor, functional characteristics, area land uses, and planned improvements. This chapter provides a summary of the existing conditions and indicates potential opportunities and constraints within the corridor. This analysis, when combined with the Intrinsic Resource Assessment and Universal Criteria (see Chapter 3), directly links all Goals, Objectives, and Strategies developed for this Corridor Management Plan.
2.1 Corridor Limits
The ROLHCSH encompasses a 120-mile route throughout Volusia County. The primary roadways that identify the ROLHCSH are US 17 and US 17/92 beginning at the Putnam/Volusia County line and proceeding south through the towns and cities of Seville, Pierson, Barberville, DeLeon Springs, DeLand, Orange City, and DeBary to the bridge crossing the St. Johns River at Lake Monroe. The corridor also includes the cities of Lake Helen and Deltona, and the communities of Cassadaga, Osteen, Samsula, Enterprise and Glenwood. To include valuable intrinsic resources many feeder roadways were included: CR 3 that runs parallel to US 17 from just above Pierson to DeLeon Springs; Grand Avenue (CR 4053) connecting DeLeon Springs through Glenwood to DeLand; New York Avenue (SR 44) from the St. Johns River Bridge to Prevatt Ave. just east of I-4; Summit Avenue (CR 4139) south to Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway (CR 4101); the western segment of West Old New York Avenue (CR 4110) to Hontoon Road (CR 4125); Hontoon Road south to the St. Johns River; Dirksen Drive (CR 4162) from US 17/92 east to Lakeshore Dr. /Enterprise-Osteen Rd. (CR 5758) then south on SR 415 to the St. Johns River; SR 11 from US 17/92 to the north Volusia/Flagler County line where the proposed Scenic Highway meets up with Heritage Crossroads: Miles of History Scenic Highway. The corridor also intersects the Florida Black Bear Scenic Byway. The corridor limits are shown in Table 1 and on Figure 1.
Table 1: Corridor Limits Roadway From To Miles US 17-17/92 Lake Monroe Volusia County Line 41.1 SR 44 St. Johns River Bridge Prevatt Ave. 10.8 SR 415 CR 5758 Volusia County Line 13.0 CR 3 17 DeLeon Springs 17 North of Pierson 12.9 CR 4139 SR 44 MLK Jr. Beltway 6.0 CR 4162 US 17/92 Lakeshore Drive 3.2 CR 5758 CR 4162 SR 415 7.1 CR 4053 US 17 SR 44 6.6 CR 4110 SR 44 (east) CR 4125 1.9 CR 4125 CR 4110 End 3.3 SR 11 US 17 Volusia County Line 14.3
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 3
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 2.2 Roadway/ROW Description
The ROLHCSH conveys the unfolding of the area’s rich cultural heritage. The northern sections speak to the region’s pre-settlement and early days, preserved in natural areas and pastures, citrus groves and ferneries upon which the first economies were based. The rural north is complemented by historic districts that maintain commercial structures that tied the agricultural economy with the development of towns and cities. Post World War II development spreads outward from the urban cores and fills in much of the southern sections of the corridor.
Along the corridor the roadways vary considerably. For example, CR 3 has no right-of-way and the road exists by right of a prescriptive easement. While most parts of SR 44 have a wide right-of-way with a four- lane divided highway defining much of its length, the segment in DeLand’s historic core is two-lane, two- way with on-street parking. Enterprise/Osteen Road is characterized by a mature tree canopy shading the road. US 17/92 has long stretches of commercial development bordering the four-lane roadway. US 17 north of the divergence with US 92 and SR 11 has long stretches of citrus groves, as well as open fields and forests with a number of ferneries and plant nurseries. Along the urbanized portions of the route there are sidewalks in most of the incorporated areas. FDOT maintains SR 44, US 17/92, US 17 and SR 11 to SR 40. SR 11 north of 40 is maintained by the City of Bunnell. Volusia County maintains the other roadway segments and medians.
Table 2: Roadway Segments and Functional Classifications Roadway Segment Functional Classification US 17 north of SR 40 Rural Principle Arterial US 17 south of SR 40 to US 92 Urban Principle Arterial US 17 and US 17/92 south to Dirksen Drive Urban Principle Arterial US 17 and US 17/92 south of Dirksen Drive to the Rural and Urban Principle Arterial Volusia County line SR 44 Urban Principle Arterial SR 415 Rural/Urban Minor Arterial CR 3 Rural Local CR 4139 Urban Minor Arterial and Urban Collector CR 4162 Urban Minor Arterial CR 5758 Rural Local CR 4053 Urban Collector CR 4110 Urban Collector CR 4125 Urban Collector SR 11 Rural Local
Included in Appendix P are Straight Line Diagrams that detail the roadway widths, the shoulder widths, the number and width of lanes, and the size and type (if any) of the medians along SR 44 and US 17/92 and US 17 to the Volusia/Putnam County line. Included in Appendix Q is a right-of-way width chart for US 17/92, US 17 and SR 44. SR 11 is a two-lane rural roadway with no sidewalks or bicycle facilities, and it has a 200-foot right-of-way along its entire length.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 5 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan The ROLHCSH CME has no right-of-way acquisitions planned at this time. The State Parks could potentially allow projects within their jurisdiction. If acquisitions are required in the future, the lead agency will coordinate with the FDOT District Right-of-Way Office on any acquisition planned or anticipated along the corridor, which is or will be related to the corridor regardless of the party involved in the property or property rights acquisition. In compliance with 23 CFR 710.513, which became effective January 21, 2000, the District Right-of-Way Office has mandated responsibility for overseeing compliance with the Federal Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 (referred to as the Uniform Act) on all property and property rights acquisition where Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (Title 3) federal funds are to be used in any project phase or where there is anticipated or intent to use FHWA federal funds at some future point in any project phase. The use of FHWA funding or intent to use FHWA funding “federalizes” the corridor and all subsequent property or property rights acquisition related to the scenic highway regardless of the parties involved. The coordination ensures that any acquisition subsequently pursued on behalf of the corridor will be in accordance with the Uniform Act of 1970. See Figure 2 for locations of existing multi-use trails.
Table 3: Summary of Right-of-Way Widths Roadway Segment From To Right-of-Way Width US 17-17/92 Lake Monroe Volusia County Line 60’-200’ SR 44 St. Johns River Bridge Prevatt Ave. 50’-225’ SR 415 CR 5758 Volusia County Line 180’-400’ CR 3 17 DeLeon Springs 17 North of Pierson 40’-120’ CR 4139 SR 44 MLK Jr. Beltway 40’-80’ CR 4162 US 17/92 Lakeshore Drive 50’-120’ CR 5758 CR 4162 SR 415 50’-120’ CR 4053 US 17 SR 44 40’-100’ CR 4110 SR 44 (east) CR 4125 40’-70’ CR 4125 CR 4110 End 40’-150’ SR 11 US 17 Volusia County Line 200’
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 6
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 2.3 Existing Land Use and Zoning
An analysis of existing land uses and zoning designations was conducted for all parcels directly adjacent to the ROLHCSH. This analysis included an evaluation of generalized land use categories and specific zoning district designations for individual segments along the routes.
The ROLHCSH is a dynamic corridor featuring a variety of land uses. The existing land uses and zoning classifications along the corridor range from Conservation and Agricultural to Commercial and Industrial. Stetson University, in historic downtown DeLand with its compact traditional campus layout, contrasts with the commercial land uses along US 17/92 between DeLand and Orange City, and the ferneries, citrus groves, pasture land and forests in the northern sections of the corridor. There are three (3) State Parks, a State Forest, and a National Wildlife Refuge within the corridor. Extensive residential uses exist throughout the corridor ranging from agricultural related homes, single family homes, and student dormitories. Commercial uses range from big-box retail to small businesses operating out of converted residential structures. There is an abundance of strip commercial along US 17/92 from DeLand through DeBary. Public uses including County and city government offices, parks, schools and libraries are found along the corridor, as are the offices of District 5 of the Florida Department of Transportation.
The general development pattern is the conversion of farmland, woodland and open space into rural/urban/suburban residential development and associated commercial development.
See attached Existing Zoning Maps, Figures 3 through 8.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 8
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 2.4 Signage
There are 80 billboards (as of November 2008) located along the proposed Scenic Highway corridor. Figure 9 and Table 4 present detailed information on each sign’s location, status and ownership. The location is identified by milepost and the right and left designation is read as if traveling north or east. The heading provides the starting point. The Corridor Advocacy Group (CAG)/Corridor Management Entity (CME) will coordinate the identification of the existing billboards with the State Outdoor Advertising Administrator to ensure that an inventory is performed by the State within thirty calendar days of the date the Secretary signs the letter designating the corridor. This application will be routed to the State Outdoor Advertising Administrator so they may plan accordingly for these responsibilities. In 1991, Section 1046(c) of ISTEA added a new subsection(s) to 23 USC 131 that precludes new outdoor advertising on designated scenic highways/byways. Once a corridor has been designated as a Florida Scenic Highway, the Outdoor Advertising Office is precluded from issuing new permits for outdoor advertising signs within the control zone of the Interstate Highway System, the Federal Aid Primary System (as of June 1, 1991) and the State Highway System along the corridor. Existing signs do not become nonconforming as a result of the scenic highway designation. However, other conditions (e.g., land use/zoning) may cause a change to the sign’s conformity status.
Outdoor advertising sign acquisition will require payment of just compensation (no amortization) on the Interstate, National Highway System or the Federal Aid Primary System (as of 1991). This is a Federal requirement under Title 23, U.S. Code, Section (g).
There are numerous on-site, “point of sale” signs located mostly in the urban portions of the corridor. These signs are regulated by the cities and by Volusia County in the unincorporated areas. The respective Code Enforcement offices are responsible for the enforcement of the signage regulations.
Code enforcement of the existing sign ordinances is of vital importance. The CAG/CME should assist the County and the cities in tracking/reporting violations, thereby preserving the aesthetics of the corridor. Volusia County and the cities of DeLand, Deltona, DeBary, Orange City, Lake Helen, and Pierson sign regulations are included in Appendix D.
Educational and historic interpretive panels could be placed within the public spaces (and with permission at institutional and privately owned sites) along the corridor that highlights its unique intrinsic resources. Specifically, interpretive panels at structures along the corridor can promote historic resources. A panel could include a description of the structure, the history of the area, and a background of the institution/structure/area. Other educational opportunities include interpretive panels to mark historic or native landscapes near pull-offs with additional information and descriptions.
Volusia County approved an educational program within the Phase 1 Manatee Protection Plan adopted in February 2001. As a part of this program signs were placed at various boat launches along the corridor informing the public of the danger boaters can pose to the manatees. Additional signage could describe the importance of flooding and fire in native environments or the restoration projects along and adjacent to the corridor. The planning for educational and historical markers has been initiated by local agencies along the corridor and the CAG/CME could expand upon their previous work. Wildflower signage within designated planting areas could be installed notifying maintenance crews not to mow to allow the wildflowers time to grow, bloom, and spread.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 15
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Table 4: FDOT Inventory of Outdoor Advertising Structures Located in the Corridor Signs on RCI Section 79050000 County: Volusia Local Name: SR15/US17 US Route : 17 State Route: 15 Section Direction: North Class: Primary Section Start: SR 600 (US92 & CR92) DELAND Section End: PUTNAM CO. LINE Milepost Side Sign Reads Tag# Status Conforming? Account 0.986 Left Right BT753 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA Canceled 0.986 Left Right BT754 Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA
1.827 Left Left BE075 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 1.827 Left Right AI517 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 3.506 Left Right AA469 Active Yes MELBOURNE 6.669 Right Right AI245 Active No SPRING GARDEN RANCH, INC 6.669 Right Left AI244 Active No SPRING GARDEN RANCH, INC SPARTON ELECTRONICS OF FL 6.682 Right Right CG482 Active No
SPARTON ELECTRONICS OF FL 6.682 Right Left CG483 Active No
NATIONAL ADVERTISING 12.072 Left Right BL397 Active No COMPANY INFINITY OUTDOOR OF 12.123 Left Left AH706 Active No FLORIDA, INC. CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 12.181 Right Right BR156 Active Yes MELBOURNE 16.537 Right Right BF895 Active Yes AMER MONUMENT & SIGN CO 16.537 Right Left BF894 Active Yes AMER MONUMENT & SIGN CO PIERSON COMMUNITY 17.055 Right Right AU134 Active Yes PHARMACY PIERSON COMMUNITY 17.055 Right Left AU133 Active Yes PHARMACY CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 22.255 Right Right BR157 Active Yes MELBOURNE
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 17 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Signs on RCI Section 79070000 County: Volusia Local Name: CARVAL ST US Route : N/A State Route: 44 Section Direction: East Class: Primary Section Start: LAKE CO. LINE Section End: 6TH AVE Milepost Side Sign Reads Tag# Status Conforming? Account 4.428 Left Left AK768 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 4.428 Left Right AK767 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 5.844 Left Left AK765 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 5.844 Left Right AK766 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 6.350 Right Left BT248 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 6.350 Right Right BT249 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 7.120 Right Right BZ196 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 7.120 Right Left BZ195 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 9.466 Left Right BQ108 Active No MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 9.485 Left Right AC087 Active No MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 9.504 Left Right BQ107 Active No MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 9.812 Left Left BD079 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 9.812 Left Right BD080 Active Yes MELBOURNE 11.129 Right Right AZ295 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 11.346 Right Right BA903 Active Yes JOHN HINTON 11.346 Right Left BA902 Active Yes JOHN HINTON 20.235 Left Right BS021 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 20.235 Left Left BS022 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 20.294 Right Right BS019 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 20.294 Right Left BS020 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 25.384 Right Right BM484 Active Yes CASEYS 25.384 Right Left BM483 Active Yes CASEYS 26.845 Right Right AV277 Active Yes FESTIVAL PROPERTIES
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 18 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Signs on RCI Section 79040000 County: Volusia Local Name: WOODLAND BLVD US Route : 17/92 State Route: 15 Section Direction: North Class: Primary Section Start: BARWICK ROAD (79040101) Section End: SR600 (US92 & CR92) (79060) Milepost Side Sign Reads Tag# Status Conforming? Account 0.523 Right Left BY724 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 0.523 Right Right BY725 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 0.930 Right Right BD078 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 0.930 Right Left BD077 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 1.527 Left Right BJ556 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 2.027 Left Left BQ728 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 5.887 Left Left BH304 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 5.887 Left Right BH303 Active Yes MELBOURNE 6.419 Right Left AK782 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 6.419 Right Right AK783 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 6.815 Left Left AQ186 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 6.815 Left Right AQ187 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 7.619 Right Right AV466 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 7.619 Right Left AV465 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 7.846 Left Right BY727 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 7.846 Left Left BY726 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 9.116 Right Right AF971 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 9.116 Right Left AF970 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 9.711 Right Right AV461 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 9.826 Right Right AG563 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 9.826 Right Left AG562 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 10.340 Left Left AL128 Active Yes MELBOURNE
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 19 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Milepost Side Sign Reads Tag# Status Conforming? Account 10.340 Left Right AL129 Active Yes CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - MELBOURNE 10.655 Left Left AB454 Active Yes LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 11.042 Right Right BJ519 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC NATIONAL ADVERTISING 11.349 Right Left AC407 Active Yes COMPANY NATIONAL ADVERTISING 11.349 Right Right AC408 Active Yes COMPANY 11.521 Right Right BR063 Active No LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 11.565 Right Left BR064 Active No LAMAR EAST FLORIDA 12.026 Left Left AV467 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. 12.026 Left Right AV468 Active Yes MAGIC MEDIA, INC. CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 12.278 Left Left AF969 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 12.278 Left Right AL096 Active Yes MELBOURNE 12.435 Left Left AK770 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 12.435 Left Right AK769 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 14.384 Left Right AQ746 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 14.384 Left Left AQ747 Active Yes MELBOURNE CLEAR CHANNEL OTDR - 14.820 Left Right BQ729 Active Yes MELBOURNE 14.878 Right Right AK786 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC 14.878 Right Left AK787 Active Yes CBS OUTDOOR, INC
Source: FDOT Outdoor Advertising Database- June 2008 http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/rightofway/dbhome.asp
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 20 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 2.5 Future Land Use The Future Land Use categories in Volusia County are used to establish a pattern of land uses and location of urban growth within the cities. Locations where various land uses, and intensities of use, will be permitted to occur in the future are identified in the County and City Comprehensive Plans and depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Element establishes and articulates broad policies in keeping with the traditional role of a Comprehensive Plan as a framework for future development. The Future Land Use categories are declared to be a part of the adopted Future Land Use policies.
The ROLHCSH is located within seven jurisdictions – unincorporated Volusia County and the cities of Pierson, DeLand, Orange City, DeBary, Lake Helen, and Deltona. The Future Land Use categories are unique for each jurisdiction. Many of the Future Land Use categories for land along the corridor within unincorporated Volusia County tend to be non-urban resource based categories including Agricultural Resource (AR), Rural (R), and Conservation (C). Public land is designated as Conservation, for example throughout the Lake George State Forest, and land that has environmental merit in private ownership is generally designated Environmental Systems Corridor (ESC). However, there are also County urban Future Land Uses assigned to land located along the corridor. County enclaves within Orange City and DeLand for example generally have a commercial land use designation. Lands within the cities are mostly developed at an urban residential and commercial scale and Future Land Uses assigned by the cities are generally urban in nature.
For the purpose of this Designation Application, the Future Land Uses along the corridor have been illustrated in six maps (Figures 10 through 15). Figure 10 depicts the Volusia County (and City of DeBary) Future Land Use designations. This is intended to be a guide in locating future land uses throughout the corridor. Figure 10 also serves as a reference/map key for Figures 11 through 15. Maps with Future Land Use designations in the cities of Orange City (Figure 11), Lake Helen (Figure 12), Pierson (Figures 14, 15), and DeLand (Figures 12, 13) are included following the Volusia County scale map. The City of Deltona’s Future Land Use maps are provided as part of a zoning atlas document located in Appendix E. Below is a discussion of each Future Land Use map.
Figure 10: Volusia County: The ROLHCSH Future Land Use that consists of the northern portion of the corridor is mostly designated as Agricultural Resource (AR) Future Land Use. There is a section of Rural (R) Future Land Use between Lower Lake Louise and Lake Juanita and also south of the Town of Pierson. There are sections of Conservation (C) Future Land Use along the southernmost portion of Figure 15 and in the middle of the map north of the Town of Pierson. Finally, Environmental System Corridor (ESC) Future Land Use can be found on the north and south sides of the Town of Pierson and also by Lake Juanita. Between Lake Juanita and Lower Lake Louise is a large tract designated as Rural (R) Future Land Use. There are also sections of Conservation (C) Future Land Use, notably along CR 3 south of Pierson, and Forestry Resource Future Land Use just off the corridor. The rural areas have the potential to experience development pressure through land use amendments into higher residential densities.
Volusia County: The northern end of the ROLHCSH Future Land Use along US 17 shows primarily non- urban Future Land Use designations including Conservation (C), Rural (R) and Agricultural Resources (AR). The area from Lake Winona Road south to DeLand is flanked with subdivision developments with Rural (R) Future Land Use designation. This area transitions into Low Impact Urban (LIU) as it approaches the limits of the City of DeLand. At the intersection of US 17 and SR 15A and on the north side of the City
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 21 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan of DeLand there is both Commercial (COM) and Urban Medium Intensity (UMI) designations. Two small areas of Industrial (I) can be found south of the intersection at SR 11 on the east side of US 17 while the west side of the corridor shows a single parcel of Urban High Intensity (UHI). The area immediately north of US 92 (International Speedway) along US 17 is transitioning from vacant commercial lands into developed commercial properties.
Land Uses throughout unincorporated Volusia County along West New York Avenue (SR 44) are generally of higher intensity. The exceptions to urban designations along SR 44 are near the St. Johns River where land uses transition westward of the City of DeLand from Low Impact Urban (LIU), Conservation (C) and Agricultural Resource (AR) to Environmental System Corridor (ESC). Small pockets of Rural (R), Industrial (I), and Agricultural Resource (AR) designations are interspersed throughout an area generally designated Low Impact Urban (LIU). Additional subdivisions are likely to be developed along this portion of the corridor due to the close proximity to the City of DeLand and the St. Johns River.
Volusia County: The ROLHCSH Future Land Use consists primarily of urban future land use designations as US 17/92 traverses through the Cities of DeLand, Orange City and DeBary to the Volusia/Seminole County line. The City of DeBary consists of a variety of residential Future Land Use designations ranging from Residential/Mobile Home to Residential/Low Density. Most of the parcels that abut US 17/92 have Commercial/Retail Future Land Use designations. Development within the urbanized areas is characterized largely by urban infill and redevelopment of post WW II structures. Other future land uses along the corridor in the City of DeBary include Commercial with some Industrial/Utilities, a small strip of Mixed Use, and some Public/Institutional (Lake Monroe Park) located at the terminus of this portion of the corridor between Lake Monroe and Dirksen Drive. Since this area is mostly commercially built out, it is likely that redevelopment will occur in the future.
Along Dirksen Drive from US 17/92 in the City of DeBary, the Future Land Uses consist of Mixed Use Area and Commercial/Retail by US 17/92 and Interstate 4, Public/Institutional (Gemini Springs), Environmentally Sensitive Lands and Residential/Low Density Future Land Use designations. As the road traverses into unincorporated Volusia County, the Future Land Use changes to Urban Medium Intensity (UMI) followed by Public/Semi-Public (P/SP), Environmental System Corridor (ESC), Low Impact Urban (LIU) and Mixed Use Zone (MXZ). This area in general is mostly built out for commercial and residential land uses and at this time there are no future plans for additional development.
Volusia County: SR 11 begins at US 17/92, north of DeLand, and stretches north to the Flagler county line. This portion of the corridor depicts a myriad of citrus groves, open fields and forests as well as a number of ferneries and plant nurseries.
Volusia County: The ROLHCSH Future Land Use illustrates that a section of East New York Avenue (SR 44) that extends east of the City of DeLand consists mostly of the Low Impact Urban (LIU) designation with the exception of the area just east of the City of DeLand city limits that is designated Urban Medium Intensity (UMI) and Commercial (COM). Along Summit Avenue/CR 4139, north of Interstate 4 (I-4), there is Public/Semi-Public (P/PS) Future Land Use and Rural Future Land Use (R) south of I-4. Future Land Uses along CR4139/Cassadaga Road within Cassadaga are Rural (R) and Urban Medium Intensity (UMI). Future Land Use designations in the City of Lake Helen are shown on Figure 12.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 22 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Volusia County: The Future Land Uses along CR 5758/Lakeshore Drive/Enterprise –Osteen Road adjacent and north of Lake Monroe are Low Impact Urban (LIU). Further east in the Enterprise Community (CR 5758) has mostly Rural (R) Future Land Use designation with a large area of Agricultural Resource (AR) Future Land Use designation as the road nears SR 415. In the community of Osteen at the intersection with SR 415 there is Low Impact Urban (LIU) Future Land Use designation. SR 415 from CR 5758 to the Volusia/Seminole County line at Lake Monroe transitions from Urban Medium Impact (UMI) and Low Impact Urban (ULI) to Rural (R) and Agricultural Resource (AR) Future Land Use designations. Further south along SR 415, the Future Land Uses are Recreational (REC) and Conservation (C). This area of the corridor has a rural character with many acres of preserved natural public lands. The floodplain of the St. Johns River and the river itself affords breathtaking scenic views that were recognized by officials as needing to be preserved and so have been. There is currently no planned future development in this area, except for roadway widening of SR 415 and developing the bicycle-pedestrian trail system to connect all the preserved lands and parks within southwestern Volusia County. The City of Deltona Future Land Use designations along the corridor indicate a high level of single family residential, residential multi-family and public, and protected lands. Also, refer to the City of Deltona Zoning Element in Appendix E.
Figure 11: Orange City: The City of Orange City Future Land Use designations adjacent to the corridor are mostly General Commercial (GC) with a section of Mixed Use (MX) along the corridor near the southern boundary of the City.
Figure 12: Lake Helen: The City of Lake Helen Future Land Use designations are mostly varying densities of single family residential with the lower density being on the outlying edges. Where the corridor runs through Lake Helen’s historic core the Future Land Use designation is Downtown (D). The City of Lake Helen’s Future Land Use designations also serve as their zoning districts.
Figures 14, 15: Pierson: The Town of Pierson Future Land Uses range from Agriculture and Rural Residential on the outskirts of town to General Retail Commercial along US 17 through the heart of the Community. The Future Land Uses along CR 3 in Pierson include a few small sections of General Retail Commercial with sections of Agriculture and Rural Residential on the north and south sides with Medium Density Residential in the center of the Town. A large tract of Medium Density Mobile Home Future Land Use stretches from CR 3 to US 17 in the southern most developed area of the Community.
Figure 12, 13: DeLand: The City of DeLand Future Land Uses consists of mostly low-density residential on the outskirts of town with a large Industrial Area to the north of downtown. There are large concentrations of Business Retail and Downtown Commercial located directly around the center of the city with medium and high-density population immediately adjacent to that. There are also small areas of Commercial and Industrial located closer to I-4 to the east of the city.
See Figures 10 through 15 for the Future Land Use along the corridor.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 23
River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan 2.6 Safety Issues
A four-year (2004-2007) chart of crash data along the corridor was provided by Volusia County Traffic Engineering and is shown in Table 5. Based on the most recent 2007 data, the ROLHCSH’s safety issues are concentrated in the US 17/92 segment. With average daily traffic volumes exceeding 50,000 in downtown DeLand, it stands to reason this level of traffic would coincide with the highest number of crashes. Crashes also varied by season with the spring months having the highest number. Most of the fatalities occur at night and the majority of the pedestrian and bicycle crashes occur during the middle of the day and early evening. Bicycle and pedestrian crashes are also more likely to occur during the week as opposed to the weekend.
Careless driving and failure to yield the right-of-way are the biggest causes of crashes and fatalities. With the exception of US 17/92, where the significant majority of the crashes are rear-end collisions, the majority of crashes were from angle impacts. Angle impacts and overturned vehicles are the causes of most fatalities. The vast majority of crashes involve vehicles registered in Volusia County. Vehicles registered elsewhere in Florida are the second most frequently involved in crashes along the corridor. Speeding was not identified as a significant factor in the cause of most crashes.
Again, with the exception of US 17/92 where approximately 62% of crashes are at or influenced by intersections, most crashes are not at an intersection or railroad crossing. The majority of crashes happen during daylight, where vision is not obstructed on dry roadways in clear weather conditions. These same good conditions, with the exception of daylight, are in existence in the majority of the fatal crashes. [In none of the crashes that result in fatalities were defective roadway conditions cited as a contributing factor.] Finally, none of the crashes involving bicycles or pedestrians cited defective roadway conditions as a contributing factor.
Over the four year time period, the vast majority of crashes involved automobiles and light trucks. In 2007, most of the fatalities involved automobiles and light trucks, with the exception of one medium truck fatality, on US 17/92. There were a total of 50 fatalities in the corridor between 2004 and 2007. Detailed Crash Data is provided in Appendix J.
During the development of the Corridor Management Plan, the Corridor Advocacy Group worked with the cities, Volusia County, FDOT and Volusia County MPO staff to identify measures that will improve safety throughout the corridor. These measurements include providing safe access to public facilities and providing a safe and efficient intermodal transportation system, both of which are described in the Goals, Objectives, and Strategies section. All the roadway segments in the corridor meet Universal Criteria #3 and provide safe accommodation for two-wheel drive vehicles, recreational vehicles and emergency vehicles. None of the roadways are obstructed by lack of vertical clearance.
Table 5, provided by Volusia County, summarizes the number of crashes by corridor roadway segment.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 30 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Table 5: River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Scenic Highway Crash Summary Crash Summary: 2004 Street Crashes Fatalities Injuries Pedestrians Bikes US 17/92 893 8 155 11 7 CR 2833 26 0 11 0 0 CR 4053 29 3 12 0 0 CR 4110 14 0 3 0 0 CR 4162 69 0 11 0 0 CR 5758 24 0 11 0 0 CR 4125 4 0 0 0 0 SR 11 54 1 13 0 1 SR 415 68 3 18 0 0 Crash Summary: 2005 Street Crashes Fatalities Injuries Pedestrians Bikes US 17/92 660 9 167 10 5 CR 2833 15 4 9 1 0 CR 4053 20 0 13 0 0 CR 4110 12 0 1 0 0 CR 4162 37 0 8 0 0 CR 5758 19 0 3 0 0 CR 4125 3 0 0 0 0 SR 11 32 2 12 0 0 SR 415 55 4 18 1 0 Crash Summary: 2006 Street Crashes Fatalities Injuries Pedestrians Bikes US 17/92 426 3 81 10 6 CR 2833 9 0 1 0 0 CR 4053 14 0 4 0 0 CR 4110 4 0 1 0 0 CR 4162 35 0 8 0 0 CR 5758 11 0 3 0 0 CR 4125 3 0 0 0 0 SR 11 30 1 18 1 0 SR 415 44 3 21 0 0
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 31 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Crash Summary: 2007 Street Crashes Fatalities Injuries Pedestrians Bikes US 17/92 514 8 123 6 2 CR 2833 11 0 11 0 0 CR 4053 10 0 8 0 0 CR 4110 10 0 8 0 0 CR 4162 42 1 22 1 1 CR 5758 14 0 4 0 0 CR 4125 2 0 1 0 0 SR 11 18 0 12 0 0 SR 415 9 0 6 0 0
2.7 Traffic Volumes/User Types and Levels of Service
The Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes and Levels of Service (LOS) are displayed in Table 6. Most segments of the corridor are operating at acceptable volumes with capacity for additional volume without a downgrade in LOS. Those segments that are operating below the allowable LOS standard are located in the urbanized areas of DeLand, Orange City and DeBary. Non-vehicular travel occurs mostly in the urbanized areas. Some of the outlying areas are favored by avid bicyclists. The Stetson University area and downtown DeLand both generate significant amounts of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The Florida Bicycle Association and the Florida Trail Association have been active supporters of improved non- vehicular facilities throughout the County. In response to their advocacy, funding has been dedicated to sidewalk improvements and trail construction. While non-vehicular facilities vary widely throughout the County, progress is being made toward the goal of providing an integrated network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The ROLHCSH’s designation as a Florida Scenic Highway will increase interest in non-motorized facilities and subsequently their use. See Figure 2 for locations of existing bicycle facilities and multi-use trails. Table 6: AADT Volumes and Future LOS Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
US 17 N. of Volusia/ 6,100 C 8,600 C - C 8,600 - Putnam Co. Line
US 17 Putnam 5,700 C 8,600 C 8050 C 8,600 C County to CR 305
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 32 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
US 17 CR 305 to 5,300 C 12,700 B 9,761 C 12,700 C Washington Ave.
US 17 Washington 7,500 C 12,700 C 9,761 C 12,700 C Ave. to SR 40
US 17 SR 40 to 8,600 C 8,600 D 18,274 B 28,600 B Lake Winona Rd.
US 17 Lake Winona 8,600 C 12,900 C 18,274 C 43,600 A Rd. to Spring Garden Ranch Rd.
US 17 Spring 11,500 C 19,600 C 21,418 C 61,800 B Garden Ranch Rd. to Ponce De Leon Blvd.
US 17 Ponce 18,800 D 61,800 A 22,404 D 61,800 B DeLeon Blvd. to SR 15A/CR 15A
US 17 SR 15A/CR 17,200 D 35,700 B 12,416 D 35,700 B 15A to Glenwood Rd.
US 17 Glenwood 25,000 D 35,700 B 20,258 D 35,700 B Rd. to Mercers Fernery Rd.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 33 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
US 17 Mercers 33,000 D 35,700 C 26,577 D 35,700 B Fernery Rd. to US 92
US 17/92 US 92 26,000 D 35,700 B 23,375 D 35,700 B Plymouth Ave.
US 17/92 Plymouth 19,500 E 16,900 F 13,740 E 16,900 C Ave. to SR 44 (New York Ave.)
US 17/92 SR 44 (New 18,200 E 16,900 F 16,113 E 16,900 D York Ave.) to Euclid Ave.
US 17/92 Euclid Ave. to 20,000 E 16,900 F 16,113 E 16,900 D Beresford Ave.
US 17/92 Beresford 32,000 D 35,700 C 33,814 D 35,700 C Ave. to SR 15A (Taylor Rd.)
US 17/92 SR 15A 50,000 D 35,700 F 61,666 D 53,500 F (Taylor Rd.) to SR 472
US 17/92 SR 472 to 33,500 D 35,700 C 35,929 D 35,700 F French Ave.
US 17/92 French Ave. 33,000 D 35,700 C 35,929 D 35,700 F to Graves Ave.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 34 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
US 17/92 Graves Ave. 33,500 D 35,700 C 41,634 D 35,700 F to Blue Springs Ave.
US 17/92 Blue Springs 36,500 D 35,700 F 41,634 D 35,700 F Ave. to Enterprise Rd.
US 17/92 Enterprise 30,500 D 35,700 C 31,931 D 35,700 C Rd. to Highbanks Rd.
US 17/92 Highbanks 22,500 D 35,700 B 29,786 D 35,700 C Rd. to Plantation Rd.
US 17/92 Plantation 22,500 D 35,700 B 29,786 D 35,700 C Rd. to Dirksen Dr.
US 17/92 Dirksen Dr. to 23,000 D 35,700 B 45,290 D 35,700 F Ft. Florida Rd.
US 17/92 Ft. Florida 23,000 D 34,200 B 45,290 D 34,200 F Rd. to Seminole Co.
SR 11 CR 304 (in 3,000 C 6,880 B 16,647 C 6,880 E Flagler Co.) to SR 40
SR 11 SR 40 to CR 3,000 C 6,880 B 11,336 C 6,880 E 15A
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 35 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
SR 11 CR 15A to 7,200 D 19,600 C 7,629 D 19,600 C US 17
CR 3 US 17 to 820 C 10,160 A 2,202 C 10,160 B Menton Rd. (south end)
CR 3 Menton Rd. 860 C 10,160 A 2,202 C 10,160 B (south end) to Palmetto Ave.
CR 3 Palmetto 1,200 C 10,160 A 2,202 C 10,160 B Ave. to Washington Ave.
CR 3 Washington 1,920 C 10,160 A 2,202 C 10,160 B Ave. to Second Ave.
CR 3 Second Ave. 2,070 C 10,160 B 2,202 C 10,160 B to North Rd.
CR 3 North Rd. to 1,830 C 10,160 A 1,867 C 10,160 A Blackburn Rd.
CR 3 Blackburn 980 C 10,160 A 1,867 C 10,160 A Rd. to Broad St.
CR 3 Broad St. to 890 C 10,160 A 1,867 C 10,160 A SR 40
CR 3 SR 40 to 1,050 C 10,160 A 1,551 C 10,160 A Lake Winona Rd.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 36 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
CR 3 Lake Winona 1,050 E 11,680 C 1,551 E 11,680 C Rd. to Ponce DeLeon Blvd.
SR 44 W. of the St. 7,500 C 12,700 C - C 12,700 Johns River
SR 44 Lake Co. to 11,400 C 12,700 C 21,061 C 12,700 E Shell Rd.
SR 44 Shell Rd. to 11,400 D 19,600 C 21,061 D 19,600 E Grand Ave.
SR 44 Grand Ave. to 11,600 D 19,600 C 17,708 D 19,600 D Hazen Rd.
SR 44 Hazen Rd. to 14,300 D 19,600 D 12,250 D 19,600 C SR 15A (Spring Garden Ave.)
SR 44 SR 15A 13,300 D 16,400 C 11,882 D 16,400 C (Spring Garden Ave.) to Stone St.
SR 44 Stone St. to 12,900 D 16,400 C 11,882 D 16,400 C Clara Ave.
SR 44 Clara Ave. to 10,000 D 16,400 C 11,304 D 16,400 C Amelia Ave.
SR 44 Amelia Ave. 15,300 D 16,400 D 11,199 D 16,400 C to Hill Ave.
SR 44 Hill Ave. to 14,600 D 16,400 D 13,443 D 16,400 C Blue Lake Ave.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 37 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
SR 44 Blue Lake 17,700 D 16,400 F 17,903 D 16,400 F Ave. to Kepler Rd.
SR 44 Kepler Rd. to 18,000 D 19,600 D 21,502 D 19,600 E Summit Ave.
SR 44 Summit Ave. 16,800 D 19,600 D 20,613 D 61,800 B to I-4
SR 44 I-4 to Prevatt 14,700 C 12,900 D 28,005 C 43,600 B Ave.
SR 44 Prevatt Ave. 14,700 B 7,200 D 28,005 B 28,900 B to Pioneer Tr.
SR 44 Pioneer Tr. to 9,400 B 28,900 A 20,843 B 28,900 B SR 415/CR 415
Old New SR 44 to 1,110 C 1,520 C 8,647 C 1,520 F York Ave. Shell Rd.
Old New Shell Rd. to 1,110 E 9,600 C 8,647 E 9,600 E York Ave. Hontoon Rd.
Cassadaga W. Volusia 2,410 E 21,600 B 5,455 E 21,600 B Rd. Bltwy. to Macy Ave.
Main St. Enterprise 4,870 E 10,080 D 1,127 E 10,080 C (Enterprise) Rd. to DeBary Ave.
Main St. DeBary Ave. 2,710 E 10,080 C 2,976 E 10,080 C (Enterprise) to Lakeshore Dr.
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 38 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
Main St. I-4 to 6,050 E 12,480 C 7,796 E 12,480 D (Lake Lakeview Dr. Helen)
Summit SR 44 to I-4 2,980 E 12,480 C 5,099 E 12,480 C Ave. Overpass
Summit I-4 Overpass 2,230 E 12,480 C 1,543 E 12,480 C Ave. to Main St.
Dirksen/ US 17/92 to 8,110 E 12,480 D 15,513 E 12,480 F DeBary/ Palm Rd. Doyle
Dirksen/ Palm Rd. to 13,170 E 12,480 F 15,513 E 12,480 F DeBary/ WB I-4 Doyle Ramps
Dirksen/ WB I-4 21,670 E 32,900 D 15,513 E 32,900 C DeBary/ Ramps to EB Doyle I-4 Ramps
Dirksen/ I-4 to Deltona 31,030 E 32,900 D 40,392 E 32,900 F DeBary/ Blvd. Doyle
Dirksen/ Deltona Blvd. 20,900 D 14,600 F 28,688 D 31,100 D DeBary to Enterprise /Doyle St.
Dirksen/ Enterprise St. 20,070 D 14,600 F 32,571 D 31,100 E DeBary/ to Main St. Doyle
Section | Background Conditions Analysis 39 River of Lakes Heritage Corridor Corridor Management Plan Adopt Adopt. Adopt. County 2006 Adopt Road 2006 2006 2025 2025 2025 Limits Allow. Allowable 2025 Name AADT LOS Allow. Allow. Project. LOS Capacity AADT LOS Capacity LOS
Dirksen/ Main St. to 22,000 D 14,600 F 31,206 D 31,100 E DeBary/ Broadway St. Doyle
Enterprise- Green 2,970 E 9,600 C 3,032 E 2,840 E Osteen Rd. Springs Rd. to Stone Island Rd.
Enterprise- Stone Island 1,960 E 9,600 C 4,856 E 9,600 D Osteen Rd. Rd. to Reed Ellis Rd.
Enterprise- Reed Ellis 1,270 E 9,600 C 2,654 E 9,600 C Osteen Rd. Rd. to Courtland Blvd.
Enterprise- Courtland 810 E 10,080 C 321 E 10,080 C Osteen Rd. Blvd. to SR 415
SR 415 - Doyle Rd. to 16,350 C 13,800 D 37,898 D 61,800 C County Enterprise- Count Osteen Rd.
SR 415 - Enterprise- 16,350 C 12,900 D 37,898 D 56,500 C County Osteen Rd. to Count Seminole Co.
Source: Volusia County Historical Counts & LOS Standards 2006, June 2008 http://volusia.org/traffic/2006%20Traffic%20Counts.pdf