Arxiv:1602.08438V2 [Physics.Flu-Dyn] 3 Aug 2016 firm That a Combustor Is Unstable, They Do Not Suggest How to Control the Insta- Bility
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Stability analysis of thermo-acoustic nonlinear eigenproblems in annular combustors. Part I. Sensitivity Luca Magria,b, Michael Bauerheimc, Matthew P. Juniperb aCenter for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, CA, United States bCambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, United Kingdom cCAPS Lab/, ETH Z¨urich,Switzerland Abstract We present an adjoint-based method for the calculation of eigenvalue perturba- tions in nonlinear, degenerate and non self-adjoint eigenproblems. This method is applied to a thermo-acoustic annular combustor network, the stability of which is governed by a nonlinear eigenproblem. We calculate the first- and second-order sensitivities of the growth rate and frequency to geometric, flow and flame parameters. Three different configurations are analysed. The bench- mark sensitivities are obtained by finite difference, which involves solving the nonlinear eigenproblem at least as many times as the number of parameters. By solving only one adjoint eigenproblem, we obtain the sensitivities to any thermo-acoustic parameter, which match the finite-difference solutions at much lower computational cost. Keywords: Thermo-acoustic stability, Sensitivity analysis, Annular combustors, Adjoint methods 1. Introduction Thermo-acoustic oscillations involve the interaction of heat release and sound. In rocket and aircraft engines, heat release fluctuations can synchronize with the natural acoustic modes in the combustion chamber. This can cause loud vibra- tions that sometimes lead to catastrophic failure. It is one of the biggest and most persistent problems facing rocket and aircraft engine manufacturers [1]. Many studies have demonstrated the ability of Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) to represent the flame dynamics [2]. However, even when LES simulations con- arXiv:1602.08438v2 [physics.flu-dyn] 3 Aug 2016 firm that a combustor is unstable, they do not suggest how to control the insta- bility. Moreover, LES is computationally expensive. Simpler frequency-based models are therefore often used in academia and industry for pre-design, opti- mization, control and uncertainty quantification. There exist two main different classes of frequency-based low-order methods in thermo-acoustics. Preprint submitted to Journal of Computational Physics (DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.032)September 24, 2018 (a) (b) cylindrical polar coordinates x, r and ⇥ and write the pressure, Outer cooling flow density, temperature and velocity as p, ⇤, T and (u,v,w), respec- tively. We will assume a perfect gas, p = Rgas⇤T. The flow Main is taken to be composed of a steady axial mean flow (denoted by burners Turbine ) bars) and a small perturbation (denoted by dashes). We make one Compressor ! of two assumptions about the combustor geometry: either we as- Pilot sume it is axially long (typical of industrial gas turbines) or that it burners has a narrow annular gap compared to its circumference (typical of aeroengines). The mean flow for either cases can be assumed Inner cooling flow to be one-dimensional. For the former case, the perturbations will also be one-dimensional (at least at frequencies of practical Outer cooling flow Dead interest). In the latter case, circumferential and axial variations end of the perturbation could be important but radial variation can be Main Holes neglected. We consider perturbations with complex frequency Split burners Combustion i⌅t Choked Split Choked ⌅, i.e. we have p = p¯(x)+p⇥(x,⇥,t) with p⇥ = Re[pˆ(x,⇥)e ], inlet Join chamber outlet Growth rate Imag( unstable (and similarly for the other flow variables). We may consider Split Pilot stable the perturbations as a sum of circumferential modes by writing burners Holes pˆ(x, )= N pˆnein⇥ and so on (where N is sufficiently large Inner cooling flow Dead ⇥ "n= N end that the higher-order− modes can be neglected). If the geometry Angular frequency Real(!) is axisymmetric throughout then the circumferential modes can Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of possible application of be considered independently. However if the symmetry is bro- thermoacoustic network model (top) and modelling approach (bottom). ken (for instance by a Helmholtz resonator being present [17]) the modes can become coupled and must be calculated together. Note that for the case of a one-dimensional geometry, only the Figuregle flow-pathway 1: (a) from Generic the inlet tothermo-acoustic the outlet, however it is network pos- of an aero-engine. (Adapted plane waves are present and we simply have N = 0. fromsible Stowto extend and the model Dowling to have multiple [9] with pathways. permission These ad- of the original publisher ASME.) The geometry is composed of a network of modules describ- (b)ditional If the ‘secondary system paths’ has may originate some by eigenvalues splitting of the flow with positive growth rate (red/filled ing its features, such as straight ducts, area changes and combus- or from secondary inlets to the geometry. The paths can later tion zones. For the straight duct modules, wave propagation is circles),terminate the as dead system ends, or is by linearly joining into unstable. other paths. Flow Adjoint methods are able to quantify used to relate the perturbations at one end of the duct to those thefrom effect one path that to another a change through in holes any can network also be incorpo- parameter has on the eigenavalues of at the other. The rest of the modules are assumed to be acous- rated. This means that cooling flows and staged combustion tically compact. Here quasi-steady conservation laws for mass, interestcan be modelled. (arrows). Schematic This diagrams figure of ais possible for illustration applica- and does not contain results momentum and energy are used to relate the flow at the inlet fromtion and calculations. modelling approach are shown in Fig. 1. At the start and exit of the module, accounting for any force or heat input of each secondary path there is an unknown parameter for the applied within the module. At a combustion zone, the unsteady perturbation (such as the ratio of the mass-flux perturbations heat release is related to the flow disturbances by a (linear) flame at a flow split), and at the end of each path there is a bound- transfer function. Acoustic boundary conditions are assumed to ary1. conditionNetwork-based (such asu ˆ = 0 methods at a dead end). model However, thedue geometry of the combustor as a net- be known at the inlet and outlet of the geometry. The proce- to thework linearity of of acoustic the model, calculationelements of where these simply the in- acoustic problem can be solved an- dure to find the resonant modes is to guess an initial value for ⌅ volves the solution of a (P + 1)-dimensional complex matrix and calculate the perturbations, starting at the inlet and stepping equationalytically (or (P + 1)( [3,2N + 4,1)-dimensional 5, 6]. Jump for coupled relations circum- connect these elements, enforcing through the modules to the outlet. In general this solution will ferentialpressure modes), where continuityP is the number and of mass secondary or paths. volume conservation [7, 8] while account- not match the outlet boundary condition. ⌅ is then iterated to Aing general for review the of dilatation linear methods caused for combustion byinstabil- flames. The acoustic quantities in each satisfy this constraint. (For coupled circumferential modes, the ity in LPP gas turbines in given [7, 8]. relative phase and magnitude of the modes at the inlet must also segment are related to the amplitudes of the forward and backward acous- be calculated.) The frequency of the mode is then Re(⌅)/(2π), tic waves, which are determined such that all the jump relations and the and we define the growth rate as Im(⌅). If the growth rate is 3 NONLINEAR FLAME MODEL − negative the mode is linearly stable and would not be expected Weboundary assume that combustion conditions takes are place satisfied. at a single combus- This can only be achieved for discrete to be seen in practice, whereas if the growth rate is positive the tion zone,values i.e. there ofthe is no radialcomplex or axial eigenvalue. staging (however, A this generic thermo-acoustic network is mode is unstable and would grow in amplitude until nonlinear constraintshown can be in relaxed; Fig. see 1a Section (adapted 5.3). This fromcombustion Stow zone and Dowling [9]). effects become important and a limit cycle is achieved. More de- is assumed to be acoustically compact in the axial direction (i.e. tails on this linear model are given in [18], with the procedure for short2. Assuming compared to the a wavelength steady of mean flow perturbations). flow, which We as- can be obtained by time-averaging coupled circumferential modes described in [17]. sumeexperiments that a ring of D premix or numerical ducts or burners simulations, is present. For an equation for acoustic pressure The above references only consider geometries with a sin- simplicity, we take these to be identical and uniformly spaced perturbations in reacting flows can be derived from the Navier{Stokes 3equations [10, 11]. Copyright This is! 2008 the by (non-homogeneous) ASME Helmholtz equation, where the source term stems from the heat released by the flame. Helmholtz solvers can calculate eigenvalues of complex three-dimensional configura- tions. Using the modal transformation q(x; t) = q^(x) exp( i!t), both network-based − 2 models and Helmholtz approaches lead to an eigenvalue problem that is nonlin- ear in the eigenvalue !; p q^ = 0; (1) N f g where is an operator acting linearly on the thermo-acoustic eigenfunction, q^, butN depending fg nonlinearly on the complex eigenvalue, !. depends on the system's parameters1 (e.g., geometry, gain and phase of theN flame fg response, area expansions), which are encapsulated in the vector p. The real part of the eigenvalue, !r, is the angular frequency and the imaginary part, !i, is the growth rate, which governs the stability.