Media and Participation to Irena for Her Brave Struggle Media and Participation a Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Media and Participation To Irena for her brave struggle Media and Participation A site of ideological-democratic struggle Nico Carpentier intellect Bristol, UK / Chicago, USA First published in the UK in 2011 by Intellect, The Mill, Parnall Road, Fishponds, Bristol, BS16 3JG, UK First published in the USA in 2011 by Intellect, The University of Chicago Press, 1427 E. 60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Copyright © 2011 Intellect Ltd All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Cover designer: Holly Rose Copy-editor: Macmillan Typesetting: Mac Style, Beverley, E. Yorkshire ISBN 978-1-84150-407-0 Printed and bound by Gutenberg Press, Malta. Contents Acknowledgements 7 Introduction 9 Chapter 1: Defining Participation: An Interdisciplinary Overview 13 1. Democratic theory and participation 15 2. Beyond democratic theory 39 3. Audience participation and communication (rights) 64 Chapter 2: Keyword – Power 137 1. A conceptual introduction 139 2. Case 1: Management in the north Belgian audience discussion programme Jan Publiek 148 3. Case 2: Barometer and the post-political 161 Chapter 3: Keyword – Identity 173 1. A conceptual introduction 175 2. Case 1: The construction of ordinary people in Jan Publiek 185 3. Case 2: Temptation Island – reality TV and minimalist participation 195 Chapter 4: Keyword – Organization 213 1. A conceptual introduction 215 2. Case 1: BBC’s Video Nation 230 3. Case 2: RadioSwap 247 Media and Participation Chapter 5: Keyword – Technology 265 1. A conceptual introduction 267 2. Case: Kinoautomat – One man and his house. The lack of uptake of participatory technology 276 Chapter 6: Keyword – Quality 309 1. A conceptual introduction 311 2. Case 1: 16plus, Barometer and the rejection of participatory products 324 3. Case 2: Alternative and community media constructions of quality: Negotiated quality 337 Chapter 7: A Short Conclusion 349 References 361 6 Acknowledgements arts of the chapters in this book were previously published as articles and book chapters, and reappear here in revised form. In chapter 1, the discussion on the Soviet theory of the press was published in anP article entitled ‘Reading back beyond the “post” pre!x. "e politics of the signi!er “post-socialism”, and its opportunities for the enrichment of participatory media theory’, in Mediální studia, 1/2010: 7–30. "e theoretical discussion on power was published as the introduction of the book chapter ‘Policy’s hubris. Power, fantasy and the limits of (global) media policy interventions’ in Robin Mansell and Marc Raboy (eds.) !e Handbook on Global Media and Communication Policy, by Blackwell, p. 113–128. "e Jan Publiek case study in chapter 2 was published as ‘Managing audience participation’ in the European Journal of Communication, 16 (2): 209–232. "e Barometer case study in chapter 2 was published as ‘Post-democracy, hegemony and invisible power. "e Reality TV media professional as ‘primum movens immobile”’ in So!e Van Bauwel and Nico Carpentier (eds.) Trans- reality Television. !e Transgression of Reality, Genre, Politics and Audience in Reality TV, by Lexington Books, p. 105–124. "e theoretical discussion on the everyday and the ordinary, combined with the case study on Jan Publiek in chapter 3 was co-authored with Wim Hannot, and published as ‘To be a common hero. "e uneasy balance between the ordinary and ordinariness in the subject position of mediated ordinary people in the talk show Jan Publiek’, in the International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12 (6): 597–616. "e second case study in chapter 3, on Temptation Island, was published as ‘Putting your relationship to the test. Constructions of !delity, seduction and participation in Temptation Island’ in the Social Journalism International Review, 2: 321–345. "e Video Nation case study in chapter 4 was published as ‘BBC’s Video Nation as a participatory media practice. Signifying everyday life, cultural diversity and participation in an on-line community’ in the International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6 (4): 425–447. Part of the second case study on RadioSwap was published as a chapter in Understanding Alternative Media, authored by Olga Bailey, Bart Cammaerts and myself, and as an article entitled ‘"e on-line community media database RadioSwap as a translocal tool Media and Participation to broaden the communicative rhizome’ in Observatorio (OBS*), http://www.obercom. pt/ojs/index.php/obs. "e theoretical discussion in chapter 6, and the case study on alternative and community media constructions of quality was published as ‘Developing democratic and negotiated quality. Re-articulating discourses of quality through democratic and participatory media practices’ in Communication Management Quarterly, 13 (4): 5–41. "e case study on 16plus and Barometer was published as ‘Produsers’ on participatory websites. Ordinary young people and the politics of banality, in Peter Dahlgren and Tobias Olsson (eds.) Young Citizens, ICTs and Democracy, p. 51–68. I thank the relevant publishers and colleagues for permission to reprint. 8 Introduction1 n November 1941 the Nazis transformed the garrison town of !eresienstadt (or Terezín in what is now the Czech Republic) into a concentration camp that became ‘home’ to more than 50,000 Jewish people who were forced to live in extremely Iharsh conditions, while they awaited deportation to the Auschwitz extermination camp. !ere were many children in the !eresienstadt camp, o"en segregated from the adults in children’s homes. !e group of young boys who were housed in Barracks L417 (or Home One) started, in secret, to produce a newspaper, Vedem (which translates as ‘We lead’), which was a remarkable collection of essays, reviews, stories, drawings and poetry, written by the 13-, 14- and 15-year-old boys in Home One2. Vedem’s #rst and only editor-in-chief was Petr Ginz (1928–1944), who took on the role aged 14. Vedem was produced weekly, from December 1942 to July 1944. !e 800 pages of Vedem, 1–190 typewritten, the rest handwritten, survived the war and are now housed in the Memorial of Terezin. !e 100 or so occupants of Home One were less fortunate; only #"een boys survived the war. Vedem’s editor-in-chief, Petr Ginz, was murdered in Auschwitz in 1944 (Křížková et al., 1995). One of the boys, Walter Roth, delivered the following address, which was (quite soon a"er) published in Vedem: !e banner has been raised. Home Number One has its own &ag, the symbol of its future work and its future communal life. !e Home has its own government. Why did we set it up? Because we no longer want to be an accidental group of boys, passively succumbing to the fate meted out to us. We want to create an active, mature society and through work and discipline transform our fate into a joyful, proud reality. !ey have unjustly uprooted us from the soil that nurtured us, from the work, the joys, and the culture from which our young lives should have drawn strength. !ey have only one aim in mind – to destroy us, not only physically but mentally and morally as well. Will they succeed? Never! Robbed of the sources of our culture, we shall create new ones. Separated from all that gave us pleasure, we shall build a new and joyously triumphant life! Cut o' from a well-ordered society, we shall create a new life together, based on organization, voluntary discipline and mutual trust. Torn from our people Media and Participation by this terrible evil, we shall not allow our hearts to be hardened by hatred and anger, but today and forever, our highest aim shall be love for our fellow men, and contempt for racial, religious and nationalist strife. (Roth, in Křížková et al., 1995: 36) Vedem remains a beautiful and at the same time horri#c symbol of the human capacity to endure hardships without surrendering humanity. Vedem demonstrates the importance of communication to articulate this same humanity: To speak, to write and to publish is to enjoy, to resist, to live and to be human. Vedem uniquely symbolizes human capacity and need to communicate. It demonstrates the importance – to all of us – of the media as a tool and structure to organize this communication, and our capacity to produce these media ourselves, even in the face of the most di(cult circumstances. !is book explores media and participation in much less horrendous circumstances, but against the backdrop of the vigour that the editors of Vedem displayed in order to democratize their communication in a place where democracy had ceased to exist. In the contemporary era, participation still sometimes meets with resistance, contempt or indi'erence, but it is no longer punished by persecution, at least not in most western democracies, and not most of the time. !is is not to imply that participation is an easy concept, either theoretically or empirically. Its ideological role in the democratic-political realm renders it a &oating signi#er, which tends to complicate matters. !e #rst part of this book attempts to grasp the concept of participation and its role within the mediascape through a detailed discussion of the articulations of participation in the theoretical-academic debates in #ve societal #elds: democracy, spatial planning, development, arts and museums, and communication. !is detailed analysis, which is in its structure inspired by Foucault’s archeo-genealogy, highlights the complexity and contingency of the signi#er participation, by showing the wide variety of – sometimes contradictory and sometimes mutually reinforcing – meanings that have been attributed to the concept of participation in these di'erent #elds in the second half of the twentieth and #rst years of the twenty-#rst century.