Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Copolymer (ABS)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Copolymer (ABS) Eco-profiles of the European Plastics Industry Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Copolymer (ABS) A report by I Boustead for Plastics Europe Data last calculated March 2005 abs 1 IMPORTANT NOTE Before using the data contained in this report, you are strongly recommended to look at the following documents: 1. Methodology This provides information about the analysis technique used and gives advice on the meaning of the results. 2. Data sources This gives information about the number of plants examined, the date when the data were collected and information about up-stream operations. In addition, you can also download data sets for most of the upstream operations used in this report. All of these documents can be found at: www.plasticseurope.org. Plastics Europe may be contacted at Ave E van Nieuwenhuyse 4 Box 3 B-1160 Brussels Telephone: 32-2-672-8259 Fax: 32-2-675-3935 abs 2 CONTENTS ABS..................................................................................................................................................4 ECO-PROFILE OF ABS ..............................................................................................................6 abs 3 ABS ABS takes its name from the initial letters of the three immediate precursors: acrylonitrile (CH 2=CH-CN) butadiene (CH 2=C-CH=CH 3) styrene (C 6H5-CH=CH 2) and is a two phase polymer system consisting of a glassy matrix of styrene- acrylonitrile copolymer and the synthetic rubber, styrene-butadiene copolymer. The optimal properties of this polymer are achieved by the appropriate grafting between the glassy and rubbery phases. ABS copolymers have toughness, temperature stability and solvent resistance properties superior to those of high impact polystyrene and are true engineering polymers. They can be formed using all of the common plastics techniques and can also be cold formed using techniques usually associated with metals. ABS is a well known polymer used in many technical and consumer applications such as: Interior and exterior automotive parts Housings for domestic appliances such as hair driers and vacuum cleaners Kitchen appliances such as mixing machines and refigerator linings Furniture parts Telephones Toys Pipes and profiles The principal operations leading to the production of ABS are shown in Figure 1. abs 4 Natural gas extraction, Crude oil processing & extraction air transport & transport Ammonia naphtha Oil naphtha Reforming Cracking production refining for benzene ammonia pygas Aromatics benzene plant benzene propylene Acrylonitrile Ethylbenzene production production butenes ethylene butadiene ethyl butadiene Dehydrogenation Polymerisation benzene of butenes of butadiene polybutadiene Styrene production styrene polybutadiene acrylonitrile styrene ABS Graft ABS SAN ABS Mass copolymer polymerisation production polymerisation production Compounding acrylonitrile- styrene- butadiene- acrylonitrile styrene copolymer copolymer (SAN) (ABS) Figure 1 Schematic flow diagram of the principal operations leading to the production of ABS. abs 5 ECO-PROFILE OF ABS Table 1 shows the gross or cumulative energy to produce 1 kg of ABS and Table 2 gives this same data expressed in terms of primary fuels. Table 3 shows the energy data expressed as masses of fuels. Table 4 shows the raw materials requirements and Table 5 shows the demand for water. Table 6 shows the gross air emissions and Table 7 shows the corresponding carbon dioxide equivalents of these air emissions. Table 8 shows the emissions to water. Table 9 shows the solid waste generated and Table 10 gives the solid waste in EU format. Table 1 Gross energy required to produce 1 kg of ABS. (Totals may not agree because of rounding) Fuel type Fuel prod'n Energy content Energy use Feedstock Total & delivery of delivered in energy energy energy fuel transport (MJ) (MJ) (MJ) (MJ) (MJ) Electricity 5.95 2.31 0.47 - 8.73 Oil fuels 0.40 16.29 0.13 26.35 43.17 Other fuels 1.03 20.08 0.04 22.29 43.44 Totals 7.39 38.67 0.64 48.64 95.34 Table 2 Gross primary fuels required to produce 1 kg of ABS. (Totals may not agree because of rounding) Fuel type Fuel prod'n Energy content Fuel use Feedstock Total & delivery of delivered in energy energy energy fuel transport (MJ) (MJ) (MJ) (MJ) (MJ) Coal 1.86 2.67 0.15 0.65 5.32 Oil 1.01 16.50 0.23 26.35 44.10 Gas 2.18 21.40 0.13 21.58 45.30 Hydro 0.14 0.07 <0.01 - 0.21 Nuclear 1.70 0.68 0.10 - 2.48 Lignite 0.38 0.84 <0.01 - 1.21 Wood <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 0.01 Sulphur <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.06 0.06 Biomass (solid) 0.02 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 Hydrogen <0.01 0.15 <0.01 - 0.15 Recovered energy <0.01 -3.98 <0.01 - -3.98 Unspecified <0.01 0.30 <0.01 - 0.30 Peat <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 Geothermal 0.01 0.01 <0.01 - 0.02 Solar <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 Wave/tidal <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 - <0.01 Biomass (liquid/gas) 0.03 0.01 0.01 - 0.04 Industrial waste 0.02 0.01 <0.01 - 0.03 Municipal Waste 0.03 0.01 <0.01 - 0.05 Wind 0.01 0.01 <0.01 - 0.02 Totals 7.39 38.67 0.63 48.64 95.33 abs 6 Table 3 Gross primary fuels used to produce 1 kg of ABS expressed as mass. Fuel type Input in mg Crude oil 980000 Gas/condensate 890000 Coal 190000 Metallurgical coal 200 Lignite 80000 Peat 180 Wood 720 Table 4 Gross raw materials required to produce 1 kg of ABS. Raw material Input in mg Air 490000 Animal matter <1 Barytes 1 Bauxite 360 Bentonite 110 Biomass (including water) 7500 Calcium sulphate (CaSO4) 89 Chalk (CaCO3) <1 Clay <1 Cr <1 Cu 84 Dolomite 6 Fe 500 Feldspar <1 Ferromanganese <1 Fluorspar 8 Granite <1 Gravel 8500 Hg <1 Limestone (CaCO3) 11000 Mg 1200 N2 130000 Ni 12 O2 1000 Olivine 5 Pb 1 Phosphate as P2O5 <1 Potassium chloride (KCl) 4400 Quartz (SiO2) <1 Rutile <1 S (bonded) <1 S (elemental) 6200 Sand (SiO2) 690 Shale 250 Sodium chloride (NaCl) 7000 Sodium nitrate (NaNO3) <1 Talc 21000 Unspecified <1 Zn 14 abs 7 Table 5 Gross water consumption required for the production of 1 kg of ABS. (Totals may not agree because of rounding) Source Use for Use for Totals processing cooling (mg) (mg) (mg) Public supply 3800000 2 3800000 River canal 2500000 46000000 49000000 Sea 480000 30000000 30000000 Well 48000 300000 350000 Unspecified 2300000 64000000 67000000 Totals 9100000 141000000 150000000 abs 8 Table 6 Gross air emissions associated with the production of 1 kg of ABS. (Totals may not agree because of rounding) Emission From From From From From From Totals fuel prod'n fuel use transport process biomass fugitive (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) dust (PM10) 1000 190 4 490 - - 1700 CO 1300 1200 50 2500 - - 5100 CO2 550000 2100000 12000 380000 -670 - 3100000 SOX as SO2 2100 4500 160 1100 - - 8000 H2S <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 mercaptan <1 <1 <1 <1 - - <1 NOX as NO2 1800 2900 92 760 - - 5500 NH3 <1 - <1 2 - - 2 Cl2 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - 1 HCl 51 26 <1 2 - - 79 F2 <1 <1 <1 1 - - 1 HF 2 1 <1 <1 - - 3 hydrocarbons not specified 880 280 27 3200 - 2 4400 aldehyde (-CHO) <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 organics <1 <1 <1 340 - - 340 Pb+compounds as Pb <1 <1 <1 <1 - - <1 Hg+compounds as Hg <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 metals not specified elsewhere <1 2 <1 <1 - - 3 H2SO4 <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 N2O <1 <1 <1 <1 - - <1 H2 36 <1 <1 16 - - 52 dichloroethane (DCE) C2H4Cl2 <1 - <1 <1 - <1 <1 vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) <1 - <1 <1 - <1 <1 CFC/HCFC/HFC not specified <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 organo-chlorine not specified <1 - <1 1 - - 1 HCN <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 CH4 27000 450 <1 2400 - <1 30000 aromatic HC not specified elsewhere <1 - <1 420 - 2 430 polycyclic hydrocarbons (PAH) <1 2 <1 <1 - - 2 NMVOC <1 - <1 28 - - 28 CS2 <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 methylene chloride CH2Cl2 <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 Cu+compounds as Cu <1 <1 <1 <1 - - <1 As+compounds as As - - - <1 - - <1 Cd+compounds as Cd <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 Ag+compounds as Ag - - - <1 - - <1 Zn+compounds as Zn <1 - <1 <1 - - <1 Cr+compounds as Cr <1 1 <1 <1 - - 1 Se+compounds as Se - - - <1 - - <1 Ni+compounds as Ni <1 2 <1 <1 - - 2 Sb+compounds as Sb - - <1 <1 - - <1 ethylene C2H4 - - <1 5 - - 5 oxygen - - - <1 - - <1 asbestos - - - <1 - - <1 dioxin/furan as Teq - - - <1 - - <1 benzene C6H6 - - - 3 - 7 10 toluene C7H8 - - - <1 - 1 1 xylenes C8H10 - - - <1 - <1 <1 ethylbenzene C8H10 - - - 1 - 2 2 styrene - - - <1 - 1 2 propylene - - - 4 - - 4 abs 9 Table 7 Carbon dioxide equivalents corresponding to the gross air emissions for the production of 1 kg of ABS. (Totals may not agree because of rounding) Type From From From From From From Totals fuel prod'n fuel use transport process biomass fugitive (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) 20 year equiv 2200000 2100000 12000 550000 -670 20 4900000 100 year equiv 1200000 2100000 12000 460000 -670 12 3800000 500 year equiv 740000 2100000 12000 420000 -670 8 3300000 abs 10 Table 8 Gross emissions to water arising from the production of 1 kg of ABS. (Totals may not agree because of rounding). Emission From From From From Totals fuel prod'n fuel use transport process (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) (mg) COD 2 2 <1 2200 2200 BOD 1 <1 <1 47 48 Pb+compounds as Pb <1 - <1 <1 <1 Fe+compounds as Fe <1 - <1 <1 <1 Na+compounds as Na <1 - <1 780 780 acid as H+ 1 - <1 7 7 NO3- <1 <1 <1 74 74 Hg+compounds as Hg <1 - <1 <1 <1 metals not specified <1 - <1 190 190 ammonium compounds 1 <1 <1 340 340 Cl- <1 3 <1 3000 3000 CN- <1 - <1 9 9 F- <1 - <1 <1 <1 S+sulphides as S <1 - <1 <1 <1 dissolved organics <1 - <1 8 9 suspended solids 55 - 4 2100 2200 detergent/oil <1 <1 <1 14 14 hydrocarbons not 13 <1 <1 4 17 organo-chlorine not <1 - <1 <1 <1 dissolved chlorine <1 - <1 <1 <1 phenols <1 - <1 3 3 dissolved solids not <1 - <1 1100 1100 P+compounds as P <1 <1 <1 120 120 other nitrogen as N <1 <1 <1 100 100 other organics not <1 - <1
Recommended publications
  • De Novo Biosynthesis of Terminal Alkyne-Labeled Natural Products
    De novo biosynthesis of terminal alkyne-labeled natural products Xuejun Zhu1,2, Joyce Liu2,3, Wenjun Zhang1,2,4* 1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2Energy Biosciences Institute, 3Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. 4Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. *e-mail:[email protected] 1 Abstract: The terminal alkyne is a functionality widely used in organic synthesis, pharmaceutical science, material science, and bioorthogonal chemistry. This functionality is also found in acetylenic natural products, but the underlying biosynthetic pathways for its formation are not well understood. Here we report the characterization of the first carrier protein- dependent terminal alkyne biosynthetic machinery in microbes. We further demonstrate that this enzymatic machinery can be exploited for the in situ generation and incorporation of terminal alkynes into two natural product scaffolds in E. coli. These results highlight the prospect for tagging major classes of natural products, including polyketides and polyketide/non-ribosomal peptide hybrids, using biosynthetic pathway engineering. 2 Natural products are important small molecules widely used as drugs, pesticides, herbicides, and biological probes. Tagging natural products with a unique chemical handle enables the visualization, enrichment, quantification, and mode of action study of natural products through bioorthogonal chemistry1-4. One prevalent bioorthogonal reaction is
    [Show full text]
  • Dehydrogenation by Heterogeneous Catalysts
    Dehydrogenation by Heterogeneous Catalysts Daniel E. Resasco School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of Oklahoma Encyclopedia of Catalysis January, 2000 1. INTRODUCTION Catalytic dehydrogenation of alkanes is an endothermic reaction, which occurs with an increase in the number of moles and can be represented by the expression Alkane ! Olefin + Hydrogen This reaction cannot be carried out thermally because it is highly unfavorable compared to the cracking of the hydrocarbon, since the C-C bond strength (about 246 kJ/mol) is much lower than that of the C-H bond (about 363 kJ/mol). However, in the presence of a suitable catalyst, dehydrogenation can be carried out with minimal C-C bond rupture. The strong C-H bond is a closed-shell σ orbital that can be activated by oxide or metal catalysts. Oxides can activate the C-H bond via hydrogen abstraction because they can form O-H bonds, which can have strengths comparable to that of the C- H bond. By contrast, metals cannot accomplish the hydrogen abstraction because the M- H bonds are much weaker than the C-H bond. However, the sum of the M-H and M-C bond strengths can exceed the C-H bond strength, making the process thermodynamically possible. In this case, the reaction is thought to proceed via a three centered transition state, which can be described as a metal atom inserting into the C-H bond. The C-H bond bridges across the metal atom until it breaks, followed by the formation of the corresponding M-H and M-C bonds.1 Therefore, dehydrogenation of alkanes can be carried out on oxides as well as on metal catalysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Pure Hydrogen by Ethanol Dehydrogenation Abstract
    The Future Role of Hydrogen in Petrochemistry and Energy Supply DGMK Conference October 4-6, 2010, Berlin, Germany Production of Pure Hydrogen by Ethanol Dehydrogenation E. Santacesaria, G. Carotenuto, R. Tesser, M. Di Serio University of Naples “Federico II”, Department of Chemistry, Naples, Italy Abstract Hydrogen production from bio-ethanol is one of the most promising renewable processes to generate electricity using fuel cells. In this work, we have studied the production of pure hydrogen as by product of ethanol dehydrogenation reaction. This reaction is promoted by copper based catalysts and according to the catalyst used and the operative conditions gives place to acetaldehyde or ethyl acetate as main products. We studied in particular the performance of a commercial copper/copper chromite catalyst, supported on alumina and containing barium chromate as promoter that has given the best results. By operating at low pressure and temperature with short residence times, acetaldehyde is more selectively produced, while, by increasing the pressure (10-30 bars), the temperature (200-260°C) and the residence time (about 100 (grams hour/mol) of ethanol contact time) the selectivity is shifted to the production of ethyl acetate. However, in both cases pure hydrogen is obtained, as by product, that can easily be separated. Hydrogen obtained in this way is exempt of CO and can be directly fed to fuel cells without any inconvenience. In this work, runs performed in different operative conditions have been reported with the scope to individuate the best conditions. A carrier of H2 6% in N2 has been used. The studied catalyst has also shown a good thermal stability with respect to sintering phenomena, that generally occurs during the -1 -1 dehydrogenation on other copper catalysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Technologies and Projects for Biolpg
    energies Review Process Technologies and Projects for BioLPG Eric Johnson Atlantic Consulting, 8136 Gattikon, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-44-772-1079 Received: 8 December 2018; Accepted: 9 January 2019; Published: 15 January 2019 Abstract: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG)—currently consumed at some 300 million tonnes per year—consists of propane, butane, or a mixture of the two. Most of the world’s LPG is fossil, but recently, BioLPG has been commercialized as well. This paper reviews all possible synthesis routes to BioLPG: conventional chemical processes, biological processes, advanced chemical processes, and other. Processes are described, and projects are documented as of early 2018. The paper was compiled through an extensive literature review and a series of interviews with participants and stakeholders. Only one process is already commercial: hydrotreatment of bio-oils. Another, fermentation of sugars, has reached demonstration scale. The process with the largest potential for volume is gaseous conversion and synthesis of two feedstocks, cellulosics or organic wastes. In most cases, BioLPG is produced as a byproduct, i.e., a minor output of a multi-product process. BioLPG’s proportion of output varies according to detailed process design: for example, the advanced chemical processes can produce BioLPG at anywhere from 0–10% of output. All these processes and projects will be of interest to researchers, developers and LPG producers/marketers. Keywords: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG); BioLPG; biofuels; process technologies; alternative fuels 1. Introduction Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is a major fuel for heating and transport, with a current global market of around 300 million tonnes per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrylamide, Sodium Acrylate Polymer (Cas No
    ACRYLAMIDE/SODIUM ACRYLATE COPOLYMER (CAS NO. 25085‐02‐3) ACRYLAMIDE, SODIUM ACRYLATE POLYMER (CAS NO. 25987‐30‐8) 2‐PROPENOIC ACID, POTASSIUM SALT, POLYMER WITH 2‐PROPENAMIDE (CAS NO. 31212‐13‐2) SILICONE BASED EMULSION NEUTRALISED POLYACRYLIC BASED STABILIZER (NO CAS NO.) This group contains a sodium salt of a polymer consisting of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or one of their simple esters and three similar polymers. They are expected to have similar environmental concerns and have consequently been assessed as a group. Information provided in this dossier is based on acrylamide/sodium acrylate copolymer (CAS No. 25085‐02‐3). This dossier on acrylamide/sodium acrylate copolymer and similar polymers presents the most critical studies pertinent to the risk assessment of these polymers in their use in drilling muds. This dossier does not represent an exhaustive or critical review of all available data. Where possible, study quality was evaluated using the Klimisch scoring system (Klimisch et al., 1997). Screening Assessment Conclusion – Acrylamide/sodium acrylate copolymer, acrylamide, sodium acrylate polymer and 2‐propenoic acid, potassium salt, polymer with 2‐propenamide are polymers of low concern. Therefore, these polymers and the other similar polymer in this group are classified as tier 1 chemicals and require a hazard assessment only. 1. BACKGROUND Acrylamide/sodium acrylate copolymer is a sodium salt of a polymer consisting of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or one of their simple esters. Acrylates are a family of polymers which are a type of vinyl polymer. Synthetic chemicals used in the manufacture of plastics, paint formulations and other products. Acrylate copolymer is a general term for copolymers of two or more monomers consisting of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid or one of their simple esters.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation Reactions of N-Alkyl-Bis(Carbazole)-Based Hydrogen Storage Materials
    catalysts Article Catalytic Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation Reactions of N-alkyl-bis(carbazole)-Based Hydrogen Storage Materials Joori Jung 1,2,†, Byeong Soo Shin 3,4,†, Jeong Won Kang 4,5,* and Won-Sik Han 1,* 1 Department of Chemistry, Seoul Women’s University, Seoul 01797, Korea; [email protected] 2 REYON Pharmaceutical, Co., Ltd., Anyang 01459, Korea 3 Hyundai Motor Company, Strategy & Technology Division, Ulwang 16082, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea 5 Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.W.K.); [email protected] (W.-S.H.) † These authors contributed equally. Abstract: Recently, there have been numerous efforts to develop hydrogen-rich organic materials because hydrogen energy is emerging as a renewable energy source. In this regard, we designed and prepared four new materials based on N-alkyl-bis(carbazole), 9,90-(2-methylpropane-1,3-diyl)bis(9H- carbazole) (MBC), 9,90-(2-ethylpropane-1,3-diyl)bis(9H-carbazole) (EBC), 9,90-(2-propylpropane-1,3- diyl)bis(9H-carbazole) (PBC), and 9,90-(2-butylpropane-1,3-diyl)bis(9H-carbazole) (BBC), to investi- gate their hydrogen adsorption/hydrogen desorption reactivity depending on the length of the alkyl chain. The gravimetric densities of MBC, EBC, PBC, and BBC were 5.86, 5.76, 5.49, and 5.31 H2 wt %, respectively, again depending on the alkyl chain length. All materials showed complete hydro- genation reactions under ruthenium on an alumina catalyst at 190 ◦C, and complete reverse reactions ◦ and dehydrogenation reactions were observed under palladium on an alumina catalyst at <280 C.
    [Show full text]
  • 7: Source-Based Nomenclature for Copolymers (1985)
    7: Source-Based Nomenclature for Copolymers (1985) PREAMBLE Copolymers have gained considerable importance both in scientific research and in industrial applications. A consistent and clearly defined system for naming these polymers would, therefore, be of great utility. The nomenclature proposals presented here are intended to serve this purpose by setting forth a system for designating the types of monomeric-unit sequence arrangements in copolymer molecules. In principle, a comprehensive structure-based system of naming copolymers would be desirable. However, such a system presupposes a knowledge of the structural identity of all the constitutional units as well as their sequential arrangements within the polymer molecules; this information is rarely available for the synthetic polymers encountered in practice. For this reason, the proposals presented in this Report embody an essentially source-based nomenclature system. Application of this system should not discourage the use of structure-based nomenclature whenever the copolymer structure is fully known and is amenable to treatment by the rules for single-strand polymers [1, 2]. Further, an attempt has been made to maintain consistency, as far as possible, with the abbreviated nomenclature of synthetic polypeptides published by the IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature [3]. It is intended that the present nomenclature system supersede the previous recommendations published in 1952 [4]. BASIC CONCEPT The nomenclature system presented here is designed for copolymers. By definition, copolymers are polymers that are derived from more than one species of monomer [5]. Various classes of copolymers are discussed, which are based on the characteristic sequence arrangements of the monomeric units within the copolymer molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Aim: to Prepare Block Copolymers of Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) and Styrene
    Conducting A Reversible-Deactivation Radical Polymerization (RDRP) Aim: To Prepare Block Copolymers of Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) and Styrene. Polymers are ubiquitous in the modern world. They provide tremendous value because the chemical and physical properties of these materials are determined by the monomers that are used to put them together. One of the most powerful methods to construct polymers is radical-chain polymerization and this method is used in the commercial synthesis of polymers everyday. Methyl methacrylate is polymerized to form poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) which is also known as acrylic glass or Plexiglas (about 2 billion pounds per year in the US). This material is lightweight, strong and durable. The polymer chains are rigid due to the tetrasubstituted carbon atom in the polymer backbone and they have excellent optical clarity. As a consequence, these materials are used in aircraft windows, glasses, skylights, signs and displays. Polystyrene (PS), which can also be synthesized from radical chain polymerization, has found extensive use as a material (also approximately 2 billion pounds per year in the US). One of the forms of PS, Styrofoam, is used extensively to make disposable cups, thermal insulation, and cushion for packaging. Scheme 1. Radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate or styrene. While there are extensive uses for these polymers, when synthesizing any material using a free-radical polymerization, samples are obtained with limited control over molecular weight and molecular weight distribution. New methods have been developed directly at Carnegie Mellon (https://www.cmu.edu/maty/) which lead to improved control in this process. This new method is a reversible-deactivation of the polymerization reaction where highly reactive radicals toggle back and forth between an active state, where the polymer chain is growing, and a dormant state, where the polymer chain is capped (Scheme 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Terminology for Reversible-Deactivation Radical Polymerization Previously Called “Controlled” Radical Or “Living” Radical Polymerization (IUPAC Recommendations 2010)*
    Pure Appl. Chem., ASAP Article doi:10.1351/PAC-REC-08-04-03 © 2009 IUPAC, Publication date (Web): 18 November 2009 Terminology for reversible-deactivation radical polymerization previously called “controlled” radical or “living” radical polymerization (IUPAC Recommendations 2010)* Aubrey D. Jenkins1, Richard G. Jones2,‡, and Graeme Moad3,‡ 122A North Court, Hassocks, West Sussex, BN6 8JS, UK; 2University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NH, UK; 3CSIRO Molecular and Health Technologies, Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC 3169, Australia Abstract: This document defines terms related to modern methods of radical polymerization, in which certain additives react reversibly with the radicals, thus enabling the reactions to take on much of the character of living polymerizations, even though some termination in- evitably takes place. In recent technical literature, these reactions have often been loosely re- ferred to as, inter alia, “controlled”, “controlled/living”, or “living” polymerizations. The use of these terms is discouraged. The use of “controlled” is permitted as long as the type of con- trol is defined at its first occurrence, but the full name that is recommended for these poly- merizations is “reversible-deactivation radical polymerization”. Keywords: active-dormant equilibria; aminoxyl-mediated; AMRP; atom transfer; ATRP; chain polymerization; degenerative transfer; DTRP; controlled; IUPAC Polymer Division; living; nitroxide-mediated; NMRP; radical; RAFT; reversible-deactivation; reversible-addi- tion-fragmentation chain transfer. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. BASIC DEFINITIONS 3. DEFINITIONS OF THE TYPES OF POLYMERIZATION TO BE CONSIDERED 4. DEFINITIONS OF RELATED TERMS 5. MEMBERSHIP OF SPONSORING BODIES 6. REFERENCES 1. INTRODUCTION In conventional radical polymerization, the component steps in the process are chain initiation, chain propagation, chain termination, and sometimes also chain transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethane: a Mini Review of Recent Advances and Perspective of Chemical Looping Technology
    catalysts Review Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Ethane: A Mini Review of Recent Advances and Perspective of Chemical Looping Technology Danis Fairuzov, Ilias Gerzeliev, Anton Maximov and Evgeny Naranov * Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospect, 29, 119991 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (I.G.); [email protected] (A.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dehydrogenation processes play an important role in the petrochemical industry. High selectivity towards olefins is usually hindered by numerous side reactions in a conventional crack- ing/pyrolysis technology. Herein, we show recent studies devoted to selective ethylene production via oxidative and non-oxidative reactions. This review summarizes the progress that has been achieved with ethane conversion in terms of the process effectivity. Briefly, steam cracking, catalytic dehydrogenation, oxidative dehydrogenation (with CO2/O2), membrane technology, and chemical looping are reviewed. Keywords: ethylene; ethane; dehydrogenation; cracking; membrane technology; chemical looping 1. Introduction Citation: Fairuzov, D.; Gerzeliev, I.; Ethylene is one of the most critical intermediates in the petrochemical industry and Maximov, A.; Naranov, E. Catalytic the global demand for this chemical is shown in Figure1; it is currently produced through Dehydrogenation of Ethane: A Mini the steam cracking of light hydrocarbon derivatives, mainly ethane and naphtha [1–3]. Review of Recent Advances and Ethylene complexes operate in 57 countries of the world. There are 215 ethylene producing Perspective of Chemical Looping facilities operating in the world. The operators of these complexes are about 100 companies, Technology. Catalysts 2021, 11, 833. and the largest are ExxonMobil, SABIC, DowDuPont [4–6].
    [Show full text]
  • Locating and Estimating Sources of Styrene
    EPA-454/R-93-011 EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0160 Work Assignment No.01 LOCATING AND ESTIMATING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SOURCES OF STYRENE Final Report Prepared for: Dallas Safriet Emission Inventory Branch U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 Prepared by: Radian Corporation Post Office Box 13000 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 April 20, 1993 This report has been reviewed by the Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Any mention of trade names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. EPA-454/R-93-011 jlh.126 3/9/93 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page PREFACE ........................iii 1 Purpose of Document ...................1 References for Section 1 ..............4 2 Overview of Document Contents ..............5 3 Background........................7 Nature of Pollutant.................7 Overview of Production and Use ...........9 References for Section 3 ............. 20 4 Emissions from Styrene Production ........... 22 Process Description................ 22 Emissions..................... 31 References for Section 4 ............. 40 5 Emissions from Major Uses of Styrene.......... 42 Polystyrene Production .............. 42 Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer Production ...... 53 Styrene-Acrylonitrile Production ......... 64 Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Copolymer Production .................... 72 Unsaturated Polyester Resin Production ...... 81 Miscellaneous
    [Show full text]
  • Patterning with Block Copolymer Thin Films
    Materials Science and Engineering R 48 (2005) 191–226 Patterning with block copolymer thin films Rachel A. Segalman* Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Division of Materials Science, Lawrence Berkeley Labs, 201D Gilman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1462, USA Received 13 October 2004; accepted 10 December 2004 Abstract The nanometer-scale architectures in thin films of self-assembling block copolymers have inspired a variety of new applications. For example, the uniformly sized and shaped nanodomains formed in the films have been used for nanolithography, nanoparticle synthesis, and high-density information storage media. Imperative to all of these applications, however, is a high degree of control over orientation of the nanodomains relative to the surface of the film as well as control over order in the plane of the film. Induced fields including electric, shear, and surface fields have been demonstrated to influence orientation. Both heteroepitaxy and graphoepitaxy can induce positional order on the nanodomains in the plane of the film. This article will briefly review a variety of mechanisms for gaining control over block copolymer order as well as many of the applications of these materials. Particular attention is paid to the potential of perfecting long-range two-dimensional order over a broader range of length scales and the extension of these concepts to functional materials and more complex architectures. # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Block copolymers; Nanopatterning; Thin films; Microphase separation; Polymer self-assembly; Block copolymer lithography 1. Introduction Block copolymers have been suggested for many applications based principally on their ability to form regular nanometer-scale patterns.
    [Show full text]