Tocolysis for Repeat External Cephalic Version in Breech Presentation at Term: a Randomised, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tocolysis for Repeat External Cephalic Version in Breech Presentation at Term: a Randomised, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00518.x May 2005, Vol. 112, pp. 627–631 Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Lawrence Impey,a Meghana Panditb Background External cephalic version (ECV) reduces the incidence of breech presentation at term and caesarean section for non-cephalic births. Tocolytics may improve success rates, but are time consuming, may cause side effects and have not been proven to alter caesarean section rates. The aim of this trial was to determine whether tocolysis should be used if ECV is being re-attempted after a failed attempt. Objective To determine whether tocolysis should be used if ECV is being re-attempted after a failed attempt. Design Randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Setting UK teaching hospital. Population One hundred and twenty-four women with a breech presentation at term who had undergone an unsuccessful attempt at ECV. Methods Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for categorical variables and a t test for continuous variables. Analysis was by intention to treat. Main outcome measures Incidence of cephalic presentation at delivery. Secondary outcomes were caesarean section and measures of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Results The use of tocolysis for a repeat attempt at ECV significantly increases the incidence of cephalic presentation at delivery (RR 3.21; 95% CI 1.23–8.39) and reduces the incidence of caesarean section (RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.14–0.80). The effects were most marked in multiparous women (RR for cephalic presentation at delivery 9.38; 95% CI 1.64–53.62). Maternal and neonatal morbidity remain unchanged. Conclusions The use of tocolysis increases the success rate of repeat ECV and reduces the incidence of caesarean section. A policy of only using tocolysis where an initial attempt has failed leads to a relatively high success rate with minimum usage of tocolysis. INTRODUCTION whether it is best administered before every attempt at ECV or whether it should be used only after a failed attempt. Breech presentation occurs at birth in 3–4% of all The aim of this trial was to test the null hypothesis that deliveries and is a major contributor to the caesarean tocolysis for a repeat ECV (i.e. after a failed ECV) does not section rate.1 This problem has increased2 following the increase the success rates of ECV. publication of the Term Breech Trial.3 Although external cephalic version (ECV) reduces both the incidence of breech presentation at delivery and the caesarean section METHODS rate,4 this effect is limited by low success rates, especially in white British women.5 Tocolysis may improve success, The trial was undertaken in the breech clinic, held in but the effect on non-cephalic births is limited.6 It is also the delivery ward of the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. time consuming and may be unpleasant, and it is not known Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Cen- tral Oxford Research Ethics Committee (C00.024) in April 2000. Women were referred to the clinic from hospital or community clinics, including those attached to other a local hospitals, if they had a singleton breech presenta- Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Oxford Fetal Medicine tion at 36 or more (nulliparous) or 37 or more (multiparous) Unit, Level 6, The Women’s Centre, John Radcliffe weeks. Health professionals were encouraged to refer all Hospital, Oxford, UK b breech presentations to the clinic for ECV before consid- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Milton Keynes General ering contraindications or counselling regarding mode of Hospital, UK delivery. Correspondence: Mr L. Impey, Oxford Fetal Medicine Unit, Level 6, Women were eligible for the trial if they had undergone The Women’s Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. an unsuccessful attempt at ECV (without tocolysis) for a D RCOG 2004 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology www.blackwellpublishing.com/bjog 628 L. IMPEY & M. PANDIT allocations in sealed numbered opaque envelopes opened in sequential order on the delivery ward. Both the patient and the ECV operator were blinded to the result of random- isation, including maternal observations, and the latter was not allowed to enquire about side effects. Tocolysis was administered as ritodrine hydrochloride (Yutopar) infusion of 50 mg (10 mg/mL) added to 12 mL dextrose saline (total 17 mL of ritodrine 3 mg/mL). This was administered by a syringe pump, starting at 1 mL/hour and increasing at 10-minute intervals to a maximum of 5 mL/hour, provided the maternal pulse did not exceed 120/minute. The placebo consisted of 17 mL dextrose sa- line solution by the same route and in similar increments, for a maximum of 50 minutes. Maternal pulse and blood pressure were measured every 10 minutes in both arms. ECV was re-attempted at 50 minutes or when the maternal pulse exceeded 120/minute, whichever was sooner. Wher- ever possible, the repeat ECV was performed by the same operator as for the first attempt. Data were collected prospectively by the research mid- wife. The primary outcome was the incidence of cephalic presentation at delivery. For the power calculation, we estimated a spontaneous version rate in the control group of 5%.7 Tocolysis for all women increases success rates from approximately 40% to 55%.8,9 Therefore, of the 60 women out of 100 who have had a failed attempt with- out tocolysis, a further 15 (25%) could reasonably be ex- pected to have a second successful attempt with tocolysis. To detect an increase in the incidence of cephalic presen- tation from 5% to 25% with 90% power (a ¼ 0.05), 124 patients were required. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of successful ECV, incidence of caesarean section, length of hospital inpatient stay, incidence of neonatal Apgar scores <7at Fig. 1. Trial profile. 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission or other rarer neonatal outcomes and mean cord arterial pH. A patient assessment of discomfort using an abbre- viated, modified McGill pain intensity score10 was also breech presentation. They were required to have had a compared. normal cardiotocograph following this, and no potential Analysis was by intention to treat. For categorical contraindications to the use of ritodrine (cardiac disease, variables, relative risks were calculated, with 95% confi- pre-existing or gestational diabetes, hypertension). Women dence intervals. Continuous variables, where normally ineligible for an initial attempt at ECV were those with a distributed, were compared by a t test. pre-existing indication for caesarean section, suspected unstable lie, pre-eclampsia, recent (<4 weeks) antepartum haemorrhage, suspected fetal compromise (abdominal cir- Table 1. Demographics. Values are presented as n (%) or mean [SD]. cumference below the third centile, with either an umbilical Tocolysis (n ¼ 62) Placebo (n ¼ 62) artery resistance index above the 97th centile or deepest amniotic fluid pocket <2 cm) or rhesus isoimmunisation. Maternal age 30.6 [4.5] 30.9 [5.5] Information sheets regarding the trial were given in ad- Nulliparous 44 (71.0) 45 (72.6) Booking weight 66.5 [13.1] 63.0 [12.0] vance of the initial ECV attempt. After a failed attempt on Height (cm) 164.6 [7.8] 165.3 [5.7] an eligible patient, written consent was obtained by the re- Caucasian race 61 (98.4) 61 (98.4) search midwife. Consenting patients were then randomly Extended breech 38 (61.3) 42 (67.7) allocated, in a ratio of 1:1, to receive either tocolysis or Liquor pool depth (mm) 43.3 [16.0] 47.7 [13.7] placebo for a repeat attempt at ECV. Randomisation was Duration first ECV (minutes) 9.1 [2.1] 9.5 [2.7] Gestation at ECV (weeks) 37.5 [0.81] 37.5 [0.85] achieved using random block sizes up to 20, with the D RCOG 2004 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112, pp. 627–631 RANDOMISED TRIAL OF TOCOLYSIS FOR A REPEAT EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION 629 Table 2. Effect of tocolysis. The values are presented as n (%) or mean [SD]. Tocolysis (n ¼ 62) Placebo (n ¼ 62) RR (95% CI)/P Primary outcome Cephalic presentation at delivery 19 (29.0) 7 (11.3) 3.21 (1.23–8.39) Secondary outcomes Successful ECV 17 (27.4) 5 (8.1) 4.31 (1.48–12.57) Caesarean section 41 (66.1) 53 (85.5) 0.33 (0.14–0.80) Elective caesarean 40 (64.5) 48 (77.4) 0.53 (0.24–1.17) Breech delivery 5 (6.5) 5 (6.5) 1.00 (0.24–4.19) Birthweight (g) 3169 [484] 3310 [429] P ¼ 0.658 Gestation at delivery (weeks) 40.0 [1.2] 38.8 [1.0] P ¼ 0.076 SCBU admission 2 (3.2) 2 (3.2) 1.00 (0.14–7.33) Length SCBU stay (days) 0.11 [0.76] 0.08 [0.45] P ¼ 0.831 Apgar < 7at5 0 0 Mean arterial pH 7.25 [0.07] 7.26 [0.08] P ¼ 0.752 Neonatal seizures 0 0 McGill score 2.3 [0.7] 2.1 [0.7] P ¼ 0.303 Maternal stay (days) 3.9 [0.3] 4.4 [0.3] P ¼ 0.176 Maternal morbidity 0 0 Data were entered prospectively on a database SPSS 8.0 An increase in cephalic presentation at delivery was (Chicago, Illinois). Demographic and antenatal data were found (Table 2). This was due to an increase in the success obtained retrospectively at the time of recruitment. Out- of repeat ECV and was followed by a decrease in the inci- come details were collected retrospectively from hospital dence of caesarean section.
Recommended publications
  • Cord Prolapse
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CORD PROLAPSE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CORD PROLAPSE Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland and the Clinical Strategy and Programmes Division, Health Service Executive Version: 1.0 Publication date: March 2015 Guideline No: 35 Revision date: March 2017 1 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CORD PROLAPSE Table of Contents 1. Revision History ................................................................................ 3 2. Key Recommendations ....................................................................... 3 3. Purpose and Scope ............................................................................ 3 4. Background and Introduction .............................................................. 4 5. Methodology ..................................................................................... 4 6. Clinical Guidelines on Cord Prolapse…… ................................................ 5 7. Hospital Equipment and Facilities ....................................................... 11 8. References ...................................................................................... 11 9. Implementation Strategy .................................................................. 14 10. Qualifying Statement ....................................................................... 14 11. Appendices ..................................................................................... 15 2 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CORD PROLAPSE 1. Revision History Version No.
    [Show full text]
  • Tractocile, Atosiban
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Tractocile 6.75 mg/0.9 ml solution for injection 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each vial of 0.9 ml solution contains 6.75 mg atosiban (as acetate). For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for injection (injection). Clear, colourless solution without particles. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Tractocile is indicated to delay imminent pre-term birth in pregnant adult women with: regular uterine contractions of at least 30 seconds duration at a rate of 4 per 30 minutes a cervical dilation of 1 to 3 cm (0-3 for nulliparas) and effacement of 50% a gestational age from 24 until 33 completed weeks a normal foetal heart rate 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology Treatment with Tractocile should be initiated and maintained by a physician experienced in the treatment of pre-term labour. Tractocile is administered intravenously in three successive stages: an initial bolus dose (6.75 mg), performed with Tractocile 6.75 mg/0.9 ml solution for injection, immediately followed by a continuous high dose infusion (loading infusion 300 micrograms/min) of Tractocile 37.5 mg/5 ml concentrate for solution for infusion during three hours, followed by a lower dose of Tractocile 37.5 mg/5 ml concentrate for solution for infusion (subsequent infusion 100 micrograms/min) up to 45 hours. The duration of the treatment should not exceed 48 hours. The total dose given during a full course of Tractocile therapy should preferably not exceed 330.75 mg of atosiban.
    [Show full text]
  • Tocolytics Used As Adjunctive Therapy at the Time of Cerclage Placement: a Systematic Review
    Journal of Perinatology (2015) 35, 561–565 © 2015 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 0743-8346/15 www.nature.com/jp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Tocolytics used as adjunctive therapy at the time of cerclage placement: a systematic review J Smith1,2 and EA DeFranco3,4 OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature on whether the use of empiric perioperative tocolytic medications could provide additional benefit when used in combination with cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of published medical literature reporting the efficacy of empiric tocolytics used as a perioperative adjunct to vaginal cerclage in high-risk patients. A PubMed search without date criteria of various tocolytics and cerclage yielded 42 studies. Review articles were excluded, as were reports of abdominal cerclage, emergent cerclage, or cerclage for the purpose of delayed interval delivery in twin gestations. RESULT: Only five publications on the topic of perioperative tocolytic use at the time of history or ultrasound-indicated vaginal cerclage placement were identified. These included zero clinical trials, three retrospective cohort studies, one case series and one case report. Only one cohort study compared cerclage with indomethacin and cerclage without indomethacin and suggested no difference between the groups. The other two published cohort studies had no referent group who received cerclage without tocolysis. One case series and one case report were also published reporting cerclage with empiric beta-mimetic and progesterone adjunctive therapy. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of published data on the topic of adjunctive perioperative tocolytics with cerclage. Adequately powered clinical trials on perioperative use of tocolysis with cerclage compared with a standard cerclage placement alone are needed to establish efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Services Division and the Clinical Research Centre Ministry of Health Malaysia
    A publication of the PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES DIVISION AND THE CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTRE MINISTRY OF HEALTH MALAYSIA MALAYSIAN STATISTICS ON MEDICINES 2008 Edited by: Lian L.M., Kamarudin A., Siti Fauziah A., Nik Nor Aklima N.O., Norazida A.R. With contributions from: Hafizh A.A., Lim J.Y., Hoo L.P., Faridah Aryani M.Y., Sheamini S., Rosliza L., Fatimah A.R., Nour Hanah O., Rosaida M.S., Muhammad Radzi A.H., Raman M., Tee H.P., Ooi B.P., Shamsiah S., Tan H.P.M., Jayaram M., Masni M., Sri Wahyu T., Muhammad Yazid J., Norafidah I., Nurkhodrulnada M.L., Letchumanan G.R.R., Mastura I., Yong S.L., Mohamed Noor R., Daphne G., Kamarudin A., Chang K.M., Goh A.S., Sinari S., Bee P.C., Lim Y.S., Wong S.P., Chang K.M., Goh A.S., Sinari S., Bee P.C., Lim Y.S., Wong S.P., Omar I., Zoriah A., Fong Y.Y.A., Nusaibah A.R., Feisul Idzwan M., Ghazali A.K., Hooi L.S., Khoo E.M., Sunita B., Nurul Suhaida B.,Wan Azman W.A., Liew H.B., Kong S.H., Haarathi C., Nirmala J., Sim K.H., Azura M.A., Asmah J., Chan L.C., Choon S.E., Chang S.Y., Roshidah B., Ravindran J., Nik Mohd Nasri N.I., Ghazali I., Wan Abu Bakar Y., Wan Hamilton W.H., Ravichandran J., Zaridah S., Wan Zahanim W.Y., Kannappan P., Intan Shafina S., Tan A.L., Rohan Malek J., Selvalingam S., Lei C.M.C., Ching S.L., Zanariah H., Lim P.C., Hong Y.H.J., Tan T.B.A., Sim L.H.B, Long K.N., Sameerah S.A.R., Lai M.L.J., Rahela A.K., Azura D., Ibtisam M.N., Voon F.K., Nor Saleha I.T., Tajunisah M.E., Wan Nazuha W.R., Wong H.S., Rosnawati Y., Ong S.G., Syazzana D., Puteri Juanita Z., Mohd.
    [Show full text]
  • Indomethacin in Pregnancy: Applications and Safety
    Original Article 175 Indomethacin in Pregnancy: Applications and Safety Gael Abou-Ghannam, M.D. 1 Ihab M. Usta, M.D. 1 Anwar H. Nassar, M.D. 1 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Address for correspondence and reprint requests Anwar H. Nassar, Beirut Medical Center, Hamra, Beirut, Lebanon M.D., American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 113-6044/B36, Hamra 110 32090, Beirut, Lebanon (e-mail: [email protected]). Am J Perinatol 2012;29:175–186. Abstract Preterm labor (PTL) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Among the available tocolytics, indomethacin, a prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor, has been in use since the 1970s. Recent studies have suggested that prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors are superior to other tocolytics in delaying delivery for 48 hours and 7 days. However, increased neonatal complications including oligohydramnios, Keywords renal failure, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and closure of the ► indomethacin patent ductus arteriosus have been reported with the use of indomethacin. Indometh- ► tocolysis acin has been also used in women with short cervices as well as in those with idiopathic ► preterm labor polyhydramnios. This article describes the mechanism of action of indomethacin and its ► short cervix clinical applications as a tocolytic agent in women with PTL and cerclage and its use in ► polyhydramnios the context of polyhydramnios. The fetal and neonatal side effects of this drug are also ► fetal side effects summarized and guidelines for its use are proposed. Preterm labor (PTL) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity in women with PTL and cerclage and its use in the context of and mortality worldwide.1 Care of premature infants has polyhydramnios.
    [Show full text]
  • Tocolytic Therapy a Meta-Analysis and Decision Analysis
    Tocolytic Therapy A Meta-Analysis and Decision Analysis David M. Haas, MD, MS, Thomas F. Imperiale, MD, Page R. Kirkpatrick, Robert W. Klein, Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH, and Alan M. Golichowski, MD, PhD OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal first-line tocolytic ing prostaglandin inhibitors, only 80 would deliver within agent for treatment of premature labor. 48 hours, compared with 182 for the next-best treatment. METHODS: We performed a quantitative analysis of ran- CONCLUSION: Although all current tocolytic agents domized controlled trials of tocolysis, extracting data on were superior to no treatment at delaying delivery for maternal and neonatal outcomes, and pooling rates for both 48 hours and 7 days, prostaglandin inhibitors were each outcome across trials by treatment. Outcomes were superior to the other agents and may be considered the delay of delivery for 48 hours, 7 days, and until 37 weeks; optimal first-line agent before 32 weeks of gestation to adverse effects causing discontinuation of therapy; absence delay delivery. of respiratory distress syndrome; and neonatal survival. We (Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:585–94) used weighted proportions from a random-effects meta- analysis in a decision model to determine the optimal first-line tocolytic therapy. Sensitivity analysis was per- reterm birth, defined as any birth before the gesta- formed using the standard errors of the weighted propor- Ptional age of 37 weeks, is responsible for most of the 1–3 tions. neonatal morbidity and mortality in the United States and consumes 35% of all U.S. healthcare spending on RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies satisfied the inclusion crite- 4 ria.
    [Show full text]
  • Cord Prolapse Clinical Guideline
    Cord Prolapse Clinical Guideline V3.0 July 2021 1. Aim/Purpose of this Guideline 1.1. This is to give guidance to all midwives and obstetricians on the recognition and management of an umbilical cord prolapse.. 1.2. This version supersedes any previous versions of this document. Data Protection Act 2018 (General Data Protection Regulation – GDPR) Legislation The Trust has a duty under the DPA18 to ensure that there is a valid legal basis to process personal and sensitive data. The legal basis for processing must be identified and documented before the processing begins. In many cases we may need consent; this must be explicit, informed and documented. We cannot rely on opt out, it must be opt in. DPA18 is applicable to all staff; this includes those working as contractors and providers of services. For more information about your obligations under the DPA18 please see the Information Use Framework Policy or contact the Information Governance Team [email protected] 1.3. This guideline makes recommendations for women and people who are pregnant. For simplicity of language the guideline uses the term women throughout, but this should be taken to also include people who do not identify as women but who are pregnant, in labour and in the postnatal period. When discussing with a person who does not identify as a woman please ask them their preferred pronouns and then ensure this is clearly documented in their notes to inform all health care professionals. 2. The Guidance 2.1. Definition Cord prolapse is defined as the descent of the umbilical cord through the cervix alongside (occult) or past the presenting part (overt) in the presence of ruptured membranes.
    [Show full text]
  • PROTOCOL: Tocolysis with Nifedipine
    PROTOCOL: Tocolysis with Nifedipine Background: Nifedipine (Adalat) is a calcium-channel blocker that acts by relaxing smooth muscle. Its main use until now has been in the management of hypertension and angina. When used in preterm labor, it relaxes the uterine wall muscle, decreasing contractions and prolonging the time to delivery. When used properly, it has a low rate of maternal side- effects and has not been shown to have significant deleterious effects on the fetus. Goal: To delay time to delivery, in order to administer corticosteroids and enable transfer to a higher-level care center. Indications: o Pre-term labor (regular contractions resulting in cervical changes) gestational age of 24 to 34 weeks, with intact membranes o To delay delivery for 48 hours to allow action of corticosteroids Absolute contra-indications o Intra-uterine infection o Intrauterine fetal death o Lethal fetal malformation o Eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia o Concurrent use of magnesium sulfate (due to risk of cardiovascular collapse) o Concurrent use of anti-arrhythmic medications o Fetal or maternal arrhythmia (eg. Wolf-Parkinson-White) o Maternal heart failure o Symptomatic maternal hypotension o Allergy to calcium-channel blockers o Current antepartum hemorrhage o Urgent fetal or maternal indication to deliver 1 Relative contra-indications o Gestational age of 24-32 weeks with rupture of membranes and no evidence of underlying infection (discuss with high-risk obstetrician) o Gestational age >34 weeks (discuss with high-risk obstetrician) o Cervical dilatation more than 4 cms (discuss with high-risk obstetrician) o Non-reassuring fetal heart pattern o Fetal tachycardia o Intra-uterine growth retardation o Multiple gestation DOSING Nifedipine (Adalat) Loading dose: 20 mg PO in one dose.
    [Show full text]
  • Outpatient Use of Prostaglandin Gel for Ripening of the Cervix and Induction of Labor
    Outpatient Use of Prostaglandin Gel for Ripening of the Cervix and Induction of Labor Mindy A. Smith, MD, MS, Lynn Swan, MD, MS, Barbara S. Caruthers, MD, MS, and Caryl Heaton, DO Ann Arbor, Michigan This case series reports the experience in a family practice center with the outpatient use of prostaglandin E2 (PGEg) gel in patients with a medical or obstetric indication for induction. A retrospective medical record review of a 15-month period was com­ pleted for 45 women receiving intravaginai PGE2 gel for cervical ripening before the induction of labor. A change in Bishop score was seen following application of the first gel in 21 women (54%). Six women (13%) had labor onset 1 to 16 hours after the initial gel placement, and an additional 19 women (42%) had labor onset within 48 hours of the final gel placement. Twenty-one women (47%) gave birth without the use of oxytocin, and only 11 women (24%) required oxytocin induction of labor. No significant differences were seen in type of delivery, delivery complications, or new­ born outcome between categories of labor onset (spontaneous, PGE2 gel, oxytocin). Two complications followed gel insertions, one case of uterine hyperstimulation and one case of a brief episode of fetal bradycardia. Both women were identified within the monitoring period and subsequently were delivered of healthy term infants. This case series demonstrates the usefulness and lack of adverse effects of outpatient PGE2 gel as an adjunct in labor induction. J Fam Pract 1990; 30:656-664. he onset of labor, defined as uterine contractions that randomized placebo-controlled trials.14-20 In addition to Tbring about progressive cervical dilation and efface- demonstrating successful cervical ripening, these studies ment with descent of the presenting part,1 is a complex reported a 30% to 60% rate of labor onset after either process involving altered hormonal levels and interaction intracervical or intravaginai prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel between both oxytocin and prostaglandins.2-6 Before the placement with few adverse effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Cord Prolapse UHL Obstetric Guideline
    Cord Prolapse Guideline for Management 1. Introduction and who the guideline applies to: This document sets out the procedures and processes to follow in the event of a cord prolapse with the intention of providing safe and effective care to this patient group. Scope: These guidelines are for the use of all staff involved in the management of cord prolapse. This includes midwifery, obstetric and anaesthetic staff. Risk Management: A clinical incident reporting form must be completed for all obstetric emergencies. Please refer to the Maternity Services Risk Management Strategy for details. Related documents: Document: Women declining blood and blood products Maternity Records Documentation Policy Patient case note documentation policy (trust wide) Thermal protection of the newborn Swabs, instruments, needles and other accountable items within maternity Resuscitation of the newborn Fetal heart rate monitoring in Labour Guideline Development Methodology: Extensive literature searches were undertaken of the Cochrane, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Few papers were identified of appropriate trials on which to base recommendations on management of emergencies. A textbook search was performed, and the following texts chosen to support recommendations: Dewhursts Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Postgraduates, 8th edition (2012) ed. K Edmond, Oxford: Blackwell Turnbull’s Obstetrics 3rd Edition (2001) eds. Geoffrey Chamberlain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Obstetrics and the Newborn 3rd Edition (1997) eds. NA Beischer, EV Mackay, PB Colditz Fundamentals of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 9th Edition (2010) Derek Llewellyn-Jones. London: Mosby Cord Prolapse – Guideline for Management Page 1 of 7 Authors: Original Working Party - updated by N Ling Written: February 2001 Contact: L Matthews, Clinical Risk and Quality Standards Midwife Last Review: April 2019 Approved by: Maternity Service Governance Group Next Review: April 2022 Guideline Register No: C226/2016 Please note that this may not be the most recent version of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report for Short Acting Beta Agonists (Sabas) Containing Medicinal Products Authorised in Obstetric Indications
    23 October 2013 EMA/664276/2013 Assessment report for Short Acting Beta Agonists (SABAs) containing medicinal products authorised in obstetric indications Procedure under Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC INN/active substance: terbutaline, salbutamol, hexoprenaline, ritodrine, fenoterol, isoxsuprine Procedure number: EMEA/H/A-31/1347 Assessment Report as adopted by PRAC with all the information of a confidential nature deleted. 7 Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8416 E -mail [email protected] Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2013. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 3 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 3 2.1. Clinical aspects .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Safety .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2. Efficacy ............................................................................................................ 8 2.2. Risk minimisation activities .................................................................................. 13 2.3. Product information ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anesthesia and Tocolytic / Uterotonic Therapy in Obstetrics
    First part of presentation: tocolytic therapy … a professional challenge • anesthesia: rarely involved in decision-making • expert knowledge essential ¾ basic pharmacological principles of such a therapy - potential side effects and complications ¾ taking care of pregnant women under tocolysis - secondary preterm Cesarean delivery Second part of presentation: uterotonic therapy … a professional challenge • anesthesia: always involved in decision-making ¾ Cesarean delivery … teamwork: essential component ¾ manual removal of placenta of safe patient care • expert knowledge as basis of a team approach ¾ basic pharmacological principles of such a therapy - potential side effects and complications ¾ taking care of pregnant women at risk of PPH Factors determining uterine tone Uterus contractility 2+ •Caintracellular as determining factor ¾ influx from extracellular compartment - slow voltage-dependent calcium channels ¾ release/reuptake from sarcoplasmatic reticulum • myosin light chain kinase activity as determining factor 2+ ¾ Ca dependent myosin phosphorylation Uterine contraction: contractile protein actomyosin Vercauteren M et al, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009 Drugs affecting uterine contractility Tocolytic substances • β-adrenergic drugs ® ® ¾ fenoterol (Partusisten ), hexoprenaline (Gynipral ) • Calcium channel blockers ® ¾ nifedipine (Adalat ) • Oxytocin antagonists ® ¾ atosiban (Tractocile ) • Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors (COX-1, COX-2) ® ® ¾ indomethacin (Indocid , Elmetacin ) • Magnesium sulphate • Nitroglycerine Vercauteren
    [Show full text]