DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography USFWS i/ Steve Maslowsk Steve Wild turkeys Bibliography Bibliography Bibliography 4VAC15-20-130. Definitions and Miscellaneous: In General. Endangered and threatened species; adoption of federal list; additional species enumerated. Acevedo-Whitehouse, K. and A.L.J. Duffus. 2009. Effects of environmental change on wildlife health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364(1534): 3429-3438. Accessed November 2013 at: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/364/1534/3429.full.pdf. Adams, M.J., D.A.W. Miller, E. Muths, P.S. Corn, E.H. Campbell Grant, L.L. Bailey, G.M. Fellers, R.N. Fisher, W.J. Sadinski, H. Waddle, and S.C. Walls. 2013. Trends in amphibian occupancy in the United States. PLOS One. 8.5: 1-5. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture (ACJV). 2005. North American Waterfowl Management Plan. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Waterfowl Implementation Plan Revision. June 2005. Accessed July 2011 at: http://www.acjv.org. ---. 2007. New England/Mid-Atlantic Coast Bird Conservation Region (BCR) 30 Implementation Plan. Accessed June 2012 at: http://www.acjv.org/documents/BCR30_June18_07_final_draft.pdf. Beacham, Deanna. 2011. Personal communication. Belazik, Matt. 2013. Personal communication. Belden, A. Jr., K.L. Dreoge, and P.P. Coulling. 2002. A Natural Heritage Inventory of the Presquile and James River National Wildlife Refuges. Natural Heritage Technical Report 02- 09. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Bhuta, A.A.R., L.M. Kennedy, C.A. Copenheaver, P.M. Sheridan, and J.B. Campbell. 2008. Boundary-line growth patterns to determine disturbance history of remnant longleaf pine (Pinus palustris P. Mill.) in mixed forests of southeastern Virginia. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 135: 516–529. Bierbaum, R.M., J.P. Holdren, M.C. MacCracken, R.H. Moss, and P.H. Raven (eds.). 2007. Confronting Climate Change: Avoiding the Unmanageable and Managing the Unavoidable. Report prepared for the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. Sigma Xi, Research Triangle Park, NC, and the United Nations Foundation, Washington, DC. Billodeaux, Lauren. 2014. Personal communication. Bilkovic, D.M., C.H. Hershner, and J.E. Olney. 2002. Macroscale assessment of American shad spawning and nursery habitat in the Mattaponi and Pamunkey Rivers, Virginia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 1176-1192. Accessed August 2013 at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1577/1548- 8675%282002%29022%3C1176%3AMAOASS%3E2.0.CO%3B2#.Ui3wlNJt5fc. Blem, C.R. and L.B. Blem. 1990. Bank Swallows at Presquile National Wildlife Refuge: 1975-1989. Raven 17: 3-6. Bibliography Bib-1 Bibliography Blem, C.R., L.B. Blem, and C. Vivarette. 2007. Study proposal for long-term studies of prothonotary warbler at Presquile NWR. Virginia Commonwealth University. Bose, Arun. 2013. Personal communication. Brame, Cyrus. 2013. Personal communication. ---. 2014. Personal communication. ---. 2015. Personal communication. Buehler, D.A. 2000. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from The Birds of North America Online. Accessed May 2014 at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/506/articles/introduction. Butts, S.R. and W.C. McComb. 2000. Associations of forest-floor vertebrates with coarse woody debris in managed forests of western Oregon. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64(1): 95- 104. Accessed February 2014 at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3802978?origin=JSTOR-pdf. Carver, E. and J. Caudill. 2007. Banking on Nature 2006: The Economic Benefits to Local Communities of National Wildlife Refuge Visitation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Economics. Clough, J.S. and E.C. Larson. 2010. Application of the Sea-Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM 6) to James River NWR. Warren Pinnacle Consulting. Warren, VT. Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, M. Pyne, M. Reid, K. Schulz, K. Snow, and J. Teague. 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Cook, J., D. Nuccitelli, S.A Green, M. Richardson, B. Winkler, R. Painting, R. Way, P. Jacobs, and A. Skuce. 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters 8: 2. Accessed May 2014 at: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024. Craig, Timothy. 2012. Personal communication. ---. 2013. Personal communication. deMaynadier, P.G. and M.L. Hunter, Jr. 1999. Forest canopy closure and juvenile emigration by pool-breeding amphibians in Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 63(2): 441-450. Demayo, A., M.C. Taylor, K.W. Taylor, and P.V. Hodson. 1982. Toxic effects of lead and lead compounds on human health, aquatic life, wildlife plants, and livestock. CRC Critical Reviews Environmental Control 12: 257-305. Dickson, J.G. 2001. Wildlife of Southern Forests: Habitat & Management. Hancock House Publishers, Washington. 99p. Bib-2 James River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Bibliography Dickson, J.G., F.R. Thompson III, R.N. Conner, and K.E. Franzreb. 1995. Silviculture in central and southeastern oak-pine forests. In T.E. Martin and D.M. Finch (eds.), Ecology and Management of Notropical Migratory Birds: A Synthesis and Review of Critical Issues. Oxford University Press, New York. Eaton, Ethel. 2014. Personal communication. Eisler, R. 1988. Lead Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Technical Report PB-88-19081/XAB. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland. Ellis, J.M., D. Rexrode, P. Furia, J. Lee, and D. Shreve. 2012. 2011 Virginia Outdoors Demand Survey. Report to the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. Accessed August 2013 at: http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/recreational_planning/documents/vosexecsum11.pdf. Engelmeyer, Todd. 2013. Personal communication. Erb, L. 2011. Eastern Box Turtle Conservation Plan for Massachusetts. Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Westborough, Massachusetts. Evans, M., E. Gow, R.R. Roth, M.S. Johnson, and T.J. Underwood. 2011. Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from The Birds of North America. Accessed November 2013 at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/246. Faccio, S.D. 2003. Postbreeding emigration and habitat use by Jefferson and Spotted Salamanders in Vermont. Journal of Herpetology. 37(3): 479-489. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Accessed November 2013 at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1566051. Frederickson, Chuck. 2007. Personal communication. ---. 2011. Personal communication. Garrison, B.A. 1998. Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia). In The Riparian Bird Conservation Plan: A Strategy for Reversing the Decline of Riparian-Associated Birds in California. California Partners in Flight. Accessed May 2014 at: http://www.californiaoaks.org/ExtAssets/riparian.pdf. Garrison, B.A. 1999. Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from The Birds of North America Online. Accessed November 2013 at: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/414. Gawler, S.C. 2008. Northeastern Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Classification. Report to the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries on behalf of the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. NatureServe, Boston, Massachusetts. Goode, C., S. Traum, and J. Balicki. 2009. Archaeological Overview Study for James River and Presquile National Wildlife Refuges, Prince George and Chesterfield Counties, Virginia. VDHR File # 2008-0628. Bibliography Bib-3 Bibliography Guiel, John. 2011. Personal communication. Gutzwiller, K.J. and S.H. Anderson. 1987. Multiscale associations between cavity-nesting birds and features of Wyoming streamside woodlands. The Condor 89: 534-548. Accessed August 2013 at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1368643. Hammerson, G. 2004. Ambystoma maculatum. In IUCN 2013. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Accessed November 2013 at: www.iucnredlist.org. Henderson-Sellers, A., H. Zhang, G. Berz, K. Emanuel, W. Gray, C. Landsea, G. Holland, J. Lighthill, S-L.Shieh, P. Webster, and K. McGuffie. 1998. Tropical cyclones and global climate change: a post-ipcc assessment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79: 19-38. Accessed November 2013 at: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520- 0477(1998)079%3C0019%3ATCAGCC%3E2.0.CO%3B2. Hennigar, C.R., D.A. Maclean, and L.J. Amos-Binks. 2008. A novel approach to optimize management strategies for carbon stored in both forests and wood products. Forest Ecology and Management 256(4): 786-797. Hoffman, D.J., O.H. Pattee, S.N. Wiemeyer, and B. Mulhern. 1981. Effects of lead shot ingestion on δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity, hemoglobin concentration, and serum chemistry in bald eagles. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 17: 423-431. Accessed July 2014 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-17.3.423. Huntington, T.G. 2006. Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 319(1-4): 83-95. Accessed November 2013 at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169405003215. Hurst, G.A. 1992. Foods and feeding. In J.G. Dickson
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Information for the Marian's Marsh Wren Biological
    Supplemental Information for the Marian’s Marsh Wren Biological Status Review Report The following pages contain peer reviews received from selected peer reviewers, comments received during the public comment period, and the draft report that was reviewed before the final report was completed March 31, 2011 Table of Contents Peer review #1 from Tylan Dean ................................................................................... 3 Peer review #2 from Paul Sykes.................................................................................... 4 Peer review #3 from Sally Jue ....................................................................................... 5 Peer review #4 from Don Kroodsman ........................................................................... 9 Peer review #5 from Craig Parenteau ........................................................................ 10 Copy of the Marian’s Marsh Wren BSR draft report that was sent out for peer review ........................................................................................................................... 11 Supplemental Information for the Marian’s Marsh Wren 2 Peer review #1 from Tylan Dean From: [email protected] To: Imperiled Cc: Delany, Michael Subject: Re: FW: Marian"s marsh wren BSR report Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:38:25 PM Attachments: 20110126 Dean Peer Review of Draft Worthington"s Marsh Wren Biological Status Review.docx 20110126 Dean Peer Review of Draft Marian"s Marsh Wren Biological Status Review.docx Here are both of my
    [Show full text]
  • B a N I S T E R I A
    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia Motacilla) Christopher N
    Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla) Christopher N. Hull Keweenaw Co., MI 4/6/2008 © Mike Shupe (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) This fascinating southern waterthrush sings its loud, clear, distinctive song over the sound of The species is considered area-sensitive babbling brooks as far north as eastern (Cutright 2006), and large, continuous tracts of Nebraska, lower Michigan, southern Ontario, mature forest, tens to hundreds of acres in size, and New England, and as far south as eastern are required (Eaton 1958, Eaton 1988, Peterjohn Texas, central Louisiana, and northern Florida. and Rice 1991, Robinson 1995, Kleen 2004, It winters from Mexico and southern Florida Cutright 2006, McCracken 2007, Rosenberg south to Central America, northern South 2008). Territories are linear, following America, and the West Indies. (AOU 1983, continuously-forested stream habitat, and range Robinson 1995). 188-1,200 m in length (Eaton 1958, Craig 1981, Robinson 1990, Robinson 1995). Hubbard (1971) suggested that the Louisiana Waterthrush evolved while isolated in the Distribution southern Appalachians during an interglacial Using the newer findings above, which were period of the Pleistocene. It prefers lotic derived using modern knowledge and (flowing-water) upland deciduous forest techniques, the "logical imperative" approach of habitats, for which it exhibits a degree of Brewer (1991) would lead us to predict that the morphological and behavioral specialization Louisiana would have been historically (Barrows 1912, Bent 1953, Craig 1984, Craig distributed throughout the SLP to the tension 1985, Craig 1987). Specifically, the Louisiana zone, and likely beyond somewhat, in suitable Waterthrush avoids moderate and large streams, habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Suburban Greenways to Provide Habitat for Forest-Breeding Birds
    Landscape and Urban Planning 80 (2007) 153–164 Designing suburban greenways to provide habitat for forest-breeding birds Jamie Mason 1, Christopher Moorman ∗, George Hess, Kristen Sinclair 2 Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA Received 6 March 2006; received in revised form 25 May 2006; accepted 10 July 2006 Available online 22 August 2006 Abstract Appropriately designed, greenways may provide habitat for neotropical migrants, insectivores, and forest-interior specialist birds that decrease in diversity and abundance as a result of suburban development. We investigated the effects of width of the forested corridor containing a greenway, adjacent land use and cover, and the composition and vegetation structure within the greenway on breeding bird abundance and community composition in suburban greenways in Raleigh and Cary, North Carolina, USA. Using 50 m fixed-radius point counts, we surveyed breeding bird communities for 2 years at 34 study sites, located at the center of 300-m-long greenway segments. Percent coverage of managed area within the greenway, such as trail and other mowed or maintained surfaces, was a predictor for all development- sensitive bird groupings. Abundance and richness of development-sensitive species were lowest in greenway segments containing more managed area. Richness and abundance of development-sensitive species also decreased as percent cover of pavement and bare earth adjacent to greenways increased. Urban adaptors and edge-dwelling birds, such as Mourning Dove, House Wren, House Finch, and European Starling, were most common in greenways less than 100 m wide. Conversely, forest-interior species were not recorded in greenways narrower than 50 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of At-Risk Species to Climate Change in New York (PDF
    Vulnerability of At-risk Species to Climate Change in New York Matthew D. Schlesinger, Jeffrey D. Corser, Kelly A. Perkins, and Erin L. White New York Natural Heritage Program A Partnership between The Nature Conservancy and the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation New York Natural Heritage Program i 625 Broadway, 5th Floor Albany, NY 12233-4757 (518) 402-8935 Fax (518) 402-8925 www.nynhp.org Vulnerability of At-risk Species to Climate Change in New York Matthew D. Schlesinger Jeffrey D. Corser Kelly A. Perkins Erin L. White New York Natural Heritage Program 625 Broadway, 5th Floor, Albany, NY 12233-4757 March 2011 Please cite this document as follows: Schlesinger, M.D., J.D. Corser, K.A. Perkins, and E.L. White. 2011. Vulnerability of at-risk species to climate change in New York. New York Natural Heritage Program, Albany, NY. Cover photos: Brook floater (Alismodonta varicosa) by E. Gordon, Spadefoot toad (Scaphiopus holbrookii) by Jesse Jaycox, and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger) by Steve Young. Climate predictions are from www.climatewizard.org. New York Natural Heritage Program ii Executive summary Vulnerability assessments are rapidly becoming an essential tool in climate change adaptation planning. As states revise their Wildlife Action Plans, the need to integrate climate change considerations drives the adoption of vulnerability assessments as critical components. To help meet this need for New York, we calculated the relative vulnerability of 119 of New York’s Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) using NatureServe’s Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI). Funding was provided to the New York Natural Heritage Program by New York State Wildlife Grants in cooperation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers
    Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Brandan L. Gray August 2019 © 2019 Brandan L. Gray. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers by BRANDAN L. GRAY has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Donald B. Miles Professor of Biological Sciences Florenz Plassmann Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT GRAY, BRANDAN L., Ph.D., August 2019, Biological Sciences Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers Director of Dissertation: Donald B. Miles In a rapidly changing world, species are faced with habitat alteration, changing climate and weather patterns, changing community interactions, novel resources, novel dangers, and a host of other natural and anthropogenic challenges. Conservationists endeavor to understand how changing ecology will impact local populations and local communities so efforts and funds can be allocated to those taxa/ecosystems exhibiting the greatest need. Ecological morphological and functional morphological research form the foundation of our understanding of selection-driven morphological evolution. Studies which identify and describe ecomorphological or functional morphological relationships will improve our fundamental understanding of how taxa respond to ecological selective pressures and will improve our ability to identify and conserve those aspects of nature unable to cope with rapid change. The New World wood warblers (family Parulidae) exhibit extensive taxonomic, behavioral, ecological, and morphological variation.
    [Show full text]
  • NH Bird Records
    New Hampshire Bird Records Spring 2014 Vol. 33, No. 1 IN CELEBRATION his issue of New Hampshire Bird Records with Tits color cover is sponsored by a friend in celebration of the Concord Bird and Wildlife Club’s more than 100 years of birding and blooming. NEW HAMPSHIRE BIRD RECORDS In This Issue VOLUME 33, NUMBER 1 SPRING 2014 From the Editor .......................................................................................................................1 Photo Quiz ..........................................................................................................................1 MANAGING EDITOR 2014 Goodhue-Elkins Award – Allan Keith and Robert Fox .....................................................2 Rebecca Suomala Spring Season: March 1 through May 31, 2014 .......................................................................3 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] by Eric Masterson The Inland White-winged Scoter Flight of May 2014 ..............................................................27 TEXT EDITOR by Robert A. Quinn Dan Hubbard Beyond the Sandhill Crane: Birding Hidden Towns of Northwestern Grafton County ............30 SEASON EDITORS by Sandy and Mark Turner, with Phil Brown Eric Masterson, Spring Backyard Birder – Waggle Dance of the Woodpeckers .............................................................32 Tony Vazzano, Summer by Brenda Sens Lauren Kras/Ben Griffith, Fall Field Notes ........................................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Warblers Wildlife Note
    hooded warbler 47. Wood Warblers Like jewels strewn through the woods, Pennsylvania’s native warblers appear in early spring, the males arrayed in gleaming colors. Twenty-seven warbler species breed commonly in Pennsylvania, another four are rare breeders, and seven migrate through Penn’s Woods headed for breeding grounds farther north. In central Pennsylvania, the first species begin arriving in late March and early April. Louisiana waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla) and black and white warbler (Mniotilta varia) are among the earliest. The great mass of warblers passes through around mid-May, and then the migration trickles off until it ends in late May by which time the trees have leafed out, making it tough to spot canopy-dwelling species. In southern Pennsylvania, look for the migration to begin and end a few days to a week earlier; in northern Pennsylvania, it is somewhat later. As summer progresses and males stop singing on territory, warblers appear less often, making the onset of fall migration difficult to detect. Some species begin moving south as early as mid and late July. In August the majority specific habitat types and show a preference for specific of warblers start moving south again, with migration characteristics within a breeding habitat. They forage from peaking in September and ending in October, although ground level to the treetops and eat mainly small insects stragglers may still come through into November. But by and insect larvae plus a few fruits; some warblers take now most species have molted into cryptic shades of olive flower nectar. When several species inhabit the same area, and brown: the “confusing fall warblers” of field guides.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Long-Billed Marsh Wren
    Vol. 67 BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE LONG-BILLED MARSH WREN BY JARED VERNER Although much of the life history of the Long-billed Marsh Wren (Telmatodytes pulustris) has been described (see especially Welter, 1935 ; Bent, 1948; and Kale, MS), most aspects have not been quantified adequately to permit analysis of geo- graphical variation between populations, Such variation often leads to insights into the ecology of a species which would otherwise be impossible. This paper presents comparative data on birds from two populations in Washington State, one (T. p. paludicola) at Seattle, the other (T. p. plesius) at Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge, 15 miles south of Spokane and 22.5 miles due east of Seattle (fig. 1). Other aspects of this study are treated elsewhere (Verner, 1964; also MS, 1963). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to acknowledge the numerous helpful suggestions and criticisms of Drs. Frank Richardson and Gordon H. Orians throughout the course of this study. Dr. R. C. Snyder kindly read the manuscript. Many colleagues assisted with field work and were helpful in discussions of the data; in this regard I would especially like to thank T. H. Frazzetta, M. E. Kriebel, K. P. Mauzey, E. R. Pianka, C. C. Smith, L. W. Spring, and M. F. Willson. My wife, Marlene, processed many of the raw field data and was responsible for lettering most of the figures. Working facilities were provided by the Department of Zoology, University of Washington, and financial assistance was provided by National Science Foundation predoctoral fellowships (1960-1963). STUDY AREAS At Seattle, two marshes (Red, 6.3 acres, and Blue, 3.3 acres) in the University of Washington Arboretum were studied in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report for Year Three of the Effects Of
    FINAL REPORT FOR YEAR THREE OF THE EFFECTS OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION (SELECTIVE LOGGING) ON ADJACENT SITES AT THE TRAIL OF TEARS STATE FOREST (EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE LOGGING ON NEOTROPICAL MIGRANT BIRDS) Contract No .: Prepared by : Dr. Scott K . Robinson Illinois Natural History Survey . 607 E. Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 Attention: Dr. Peter Stengel National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 1120 Connecticut Ave .; N.W. #900 Washington, D .C. 20036 and Mr. Vernon Kleen IL Department of Conservation Division of Natural Heritage Lincoln Tower Plaza 524 South Second Street Springfield, IL 62701-1787 0 7 2 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of the third year of a study of the effects of selective logging on nesting forest songbirds, especially neotropical migrants. Remarkably little is known about how selective logging alters bird community composition, brood parasitism levels and rates of nest depredation (see enclosed review of the literature) . The goal of this study is to compare bird community composition and nesting success in recently (55 years), old (12-year), and adjacent uncut ravines in the Trail of Tears State Forest, including the Ozark Hills Nature Preserve . This report emphasizes the results of the 1992 field season, but will also compare the results with the previous two years. The final report will be prepared for the project by the end of 1993 . STUDY AREA The Trail of Tears State Forest is located in the Illinois Ozarks region of Union County in extreme southern Illinois . The topography of this 2,050-ha forest is uniform with narrow ridges and ravines covered with oak-hickory forest and tulip-tree in the wider ravines .
    [Show full text]
  • The Marsh Wren Braddock Bay Bird Observatory
    Fall 2016 www.bbbo.org The Marsh Wren Braddock Bay Bird Observatory A non-profit organization dedicated to ornithological research, education, and conservation. Feather by Feather ave you ever wondered what our banders are molt begins in the nest, and for others it takes place weeks looking at when they peer so intently at a bird’s tail to months after fledging. While the flight feathers of the or wing, smoothing the feathers or fanning them wing and tail are typically not replaced during this molt, Hout for a better view? The simple answer is . molt! the body plumage is replaced with feathers much closer in appearance to adult feathers. All About Molt At the end of the breeding season, adult passerines in North America undergo a complete molt of all body and flight In addition to determining a bird’s appearance, feathers feathers, resulting in a uniform coat of feathers termed the serve many important functions including insulation from “basic plumage”. Some species have an additional molt - the elements and flight control. Feathers wear out over time, typically in the spring - to prepare for the breeding season. and so all birds replace their feathers in predictable patterns This molt, called the “prelternate molt”, is typically not on an annual cycle. The process of feather replacement is complete and may involve only a few feathers on the body called “molt.” and wing. Birds like ducks and geese are covered with fuzzy downy feathers when they hatch, but passerines hatch essentially Juvenal Feathers Tell the Tale featherless. They have, or may acquire, a sparse coat of natal down but these wispy feathers are quickly replaced Juvenal feathers are different than their adult counterparts.
    [Show full text]