Institutes of Roman Law [160 AD]
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES on Property and Land Law
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES on Property and Land Law EDITED BY Elisabetta Fiocchi Malaspina and Simona Tarozzi Historical Perspectives on Property and Land Law The Figuerola Institute Programme: Legal History The Programme “Legal History” of the Figuerola Institute of Social Science History –a part of the Carlos III University of Madrid– is devoted to improve the overall knowledge on the history of law from different points of view –academically, culturally, socially, and institutionally– covering both ancient and modern eras. A number of experts from several countries have participated in the Programme, bringing in their specialized knowledge and dedication to the subject of their expertise. To give a better visibility of its activities, the Programme has published in its Book Series a number of monographs on the different aspects of its academic discipline. Publisher: Carlos III University of Madrid Book Series: Legal History Editorial Committee: Manuel Ángel Bermejo Castrillo, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Catherine Fillon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 Manuel Martínez Neira, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Carlos Petit, Universidad de Huelva Cristina Vano, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II More information at www.uc3m.es/legal_history Historical Perspectives on Property and Land Law An Interdisciplinary Dialogue on Methods and Research Approaches Edited by Elisabetta Fiocchi Malaspina and Simona Tarozzi Dykinson 2019 Historia del derecho, 78 ISSN: 2255-5137 © Autores Editorial Dykinson c/ Meléndez Valdés, 61 – 28015 Madrid Tlf. (+34) 91 544 28 46 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.dykinson.com Preimpresión: TALLERONCE ISBN: 978-84-1324-499-0 Versión electrónica disponible en e-Archivo http://hdl.handle.net/10016/29290 Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España TABLE OF CONTENT 9 Introduction Transfer of Immovable Properties, Publicity and 15 Land Law in the Age of Justinian: the Perspective of the Praetorian Prefect. -
FACULDADE DE DIREITO DE LISBOA Exame De Direito Romano
FACULDADE DE DIREITO DE LISBOA Exame de Direito Romano (época de coincidências) 22 de Janeiro de 2015 Grupo I Explique sucintamente três (3) dos seguintes tópicos: 1. Magistraturas maiores e menores; 2. Auctoritas prudentium; 3. Lex rogata; 4. Digesto; 5. Tetrarquia. Grupo II Discorra, fundadamente, sobre a evolução histórico-institucional e as competências do Senado desde a Monarquia ao Principado. Grupo III Comente, fundadamente, o seguinte trecho. “O Direito Privado Romano dos períodos pré-clássico e clássico (…) é caracterizado como direito de juristas (…)”. Max Kaser, Direito Privado Romano2, FCG, Lisboa, 2011, § 2. II, p. 32. Cotações: Grupo I: 2valores cada questão; Grupo II: 6valores; Grupo III: 8 valores. Tópicos de correcção Os presentes tópicos de correcção não pretendem exaurir todas as vias possíveis de argumentação histórico-jurídica, mas apenas fornecer uma linha orientadora de discurso juridicamente fundamentado. Grupo I I/1. Magistraturas maiores, aquelas cujos titulares estavam investidos de auspicia maiores (censor ditador; cônsul; pretor; tribuni militum). Magistraturas menores, as restantes ou aquelas cujo magistrado era apenas titular de auspicia menores (edilidade; questura). A diferenciar da distinção entre magistraturas com imperium e sem imperium. Menção às magistraturas ordinárias e extraordinárias (o cursus honorum - critério de dignidade e eleição periódica). I/2. A criação do Direito baseada na auctoritas: o Direito romano como Direito de juristas. Distinção entre auctoritas e imperium. A distinção entre auctoritas prudentium e auctoritas patrum e auctoritas das magistraturas. I/3. Lex rogata (pública) como norma jurídica escrita; declaração solene com valor normativo emitida por órgão constitucional com competência para tal (ideia de sponsio communis), sob proposta de magistrado (rogatio). -
{Replace with the Title of Your Dissertation}
Haec Templa: Religion in Cicero’s Orations A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY NICHOLAS ROBERT WAGNER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Spencer Cole April 2019 © NICHOLAS WAGNER 2019 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my advisor, Spencer Cole, who provided helpful feedback and recommendations throughout the entire process of this dissertation and deserves singular acknowledgement. The project originated with a 2013 course on Roman religion. That, along with numerous meetings and emails, has been fundamental to my approach to the subject. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Christopher Nappa, Andrew Gallia, and Richard Graff, all of whom provided immensely useful feedback at various stages, both in the scope of the project and future directions to train my attention. Next, thanks are due to the faculty and the graduate students in the Department of Classical and Near Eastern Studies at the University of Minnesota. Their support over the years has been invaluable, both academically and socially. Special thanks are due to current student Joshua Reno and former student Rachael Cullick. Lunches with them, where they patiently heard my ideas in its earliest stages, will be ever-cherished. Finally, I would like to thank my parents and siblings for their endless support over the years. Sometimes a nice meal or a break at the movies is exactly what was needed. i Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my parents and their parents. ii Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Cicero and Lived Religion ........................................................................................................ -
The Roman Republic S
P1: IML/SPH P2: IML/SPH QC: IML/SPH T1: IML CB598-FM CB598-Flower-v3 August 26, 2003 18:47 The Cambridge Companion to THE ROMAN REPUBLIC S Edited by Harriet I. Flower Princeton University iii P1: IML/SPH P2: IML/SPH QC: IML/SPH T1: IML CB598-FM CB598-Flower-v3 August 26, 2003 18:47 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru,UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2004 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2004 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Bembo 11/13 pt. System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic / edited by Harriet I. Flower. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-521-80794-8 – isbn 0-521-00390-3 (pb.) 1. Rome – History – Republic, 510–30 b.c. I. Flower, Harriet I. dg235.c36 2003 937.02 – dc21 2003048572 isbn 0 521 80794 8 hardback isbn 0 521 00390 3 paperback iv P1: IML/SPH P2: IML/SPH QC: IML/SPH T1: IML CB598-FM CB598-Flower-v3 August 26, 2003 18:47 Contents S List of Illustrations and Maps page vii List of Contributors ix Preface xv Introduction 1 HARRIET I. -
Section 6. CLASSICAL MARRIAGE and FAMILY PROPERTY
356 CLASSICAL MARRIAGE AND FAMILY PROPERTY Sec. 5 Section 6. CLASSICAL MARRIAGE AND FAMILY PROPERTY A. PRIMARY SOURCES 1. Gaius, Institutes 1.108–115b (see above, pp. 138–139) 2. Justinian, Institutes 1.10 (see above, pp. 188–189) 3. Digest 23.2 (see above, pp. 18–29) 4. Code 5.4 (see above, pp. 29–34) 5. The Laudatio Turiae in Erik Wistrand, The So-Called Laudatio Turiae, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, 34 ([Goteborg]: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1976) pp. 19–31 (odd nos.)† NOTE: This is the fragmentary text of an inscription erected by an upper-class Roman to his wife some time in the last years B.C. The identification of the man as Q. Lucretius Vespillo, consul in 19 B.C., whose wife was named Turia, gives the inscription its name, but the identification is far from certain. The wars referred to in the early part of the inscription are almost certainly those between Caesar and Pompey, 49–46 B.C. (Heading) ……………………………………………………………………………………………….OF MY WIFE Left-hand Column (Line 1) … through the honesty of your character … . (2) … you remained … (3) You became an orphan suddenly before the day of our wedding, when both your parents were murdered together in the solitude of the countryside. It was mainly due to your efforts that the death of your parents was not left unavenged. For I had left for Macedonia, and your sister’s husband Cluvius had gone to the Province of Africa. (7) So strenuously did you perform your filial duty by your insistent demands and your pursuit of justice that we could not have done more if we had been present. -
Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius
THE REPUBLIC IN DANGER This page intentionally left blank The Republic in Danger Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius ANDREW PETTINGER 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries # Andrew Pettinger 2012 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2012 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available ISBN 978–0–19–960174–5 Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn To Hayley, Sue, and Graham Preface In 2003, while reading modern works on treason trials in Rome, I came across the prosecution of M. Scribonius Drusus Libo, an aristocrat destroyed in AD 16 for seeking out the opinions of a necromancer. -
History of Rome from the Earliest Times Down to 476 AD
History of Rome from the Earliest Times Down to 476 AD Robert F. Pennell History of Rome from the Earliest Times Down to 476 AD Table of Contents History of Rome from the Earliest Times Down to 476 AD..................................................................................1 Robert F. Pennell............................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE......................................................................................................................................................2 ANCIENT ROME.......................................................................................................................................................2 CHAPTER I. GEOGRAPHY OF ITALY.....................................................................................................3 CHAPTER II. THE EARLY INHABITANTS OF ITALY...........................................................................4 CHAPTER III. THE ROMANS AND THEIR EARLY GOVERNMENT...................................................5 CHAPTER IV. THE EARLY GROWTH AND INTERNAL HISTORY OF ROME..................................6 CHAPTER V. THE DYNASTY OF THE TARQUINS................................................................................8 CHAPTER VI. THE CONSULS AND TRIBUNES.....................................................................................8 CHAPTER VII. THE COMITIA TRIBUTA AND THE AGRARIAN LAWS..........................................10 CHAPTER -
The Language of Roman Adultery
THE LANGUAGE OF ROMAN ADULTERY A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2012 JESSICA E. DIXON SCHOOL OF ARTS, LANGUAGES AND CULTURES Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................... 4 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................... 5 DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................................. 6 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................... 9 1.1) LAW AND SOCIETY ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2) MORAL REFORM ...................................................................................................................................... -
The Belly and the Limbs: Reconsidering the Idea of a Plebeian “State Within the State” in the Early Roman Republic DISSERTAT
The Belly and the Limbs: Reconsidering the Idea of a Plebeian “State Within the State” in the Early Roman Republic DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gregory George Pellam, Jr. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Professor Nathan Rosenstein, Advisor Professor Greg Anderson Professor Kristina Sessa Copyright by Gregory George Pellam, Jr. 2012 Abstract This dissertation offers a reevaluation of a long-standing model for the early history of the Roman Republic. Modern scholars have generally believed that the Roman plebs in the first two centuries of the Republic (roughly the fifth and fourth centuries B.C.) was essentially a revolutionary political organization, dedicated to increasing the rights and opportunities of plebeians and overthrowing the patrician monopoly over political, social, religious, and economic power. According to this model, a series of institutions which were dominated by patrician authority (the consulship, the senate, the centuriate assembly) represented the state, and the plebeian organization created its own institutions to mirror these (the tribunes and aediles of the plebs, and a plebeian tribal assembly). Further, the plebs established for itself an administrative center for its political activities on the Aventine hill. They even created their own cult center in the temple of Ceres, Liber, and Libera, to mirror the “state” cult of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva on the Capitoline. This plebeian organization is often referred to in modern scholarship as a “state within the state”. It is shown, however, that the evidence for the plebeian “state within the state” does not stand careful scrutiny. -
Ancient Roman History Study Guide
Santa Reparata International School of Art Academic Year 2017/2018, Fall 2017 Etruscan and Ancient Roman Civilizations prof. Lorenzo Pubblici Ph.D. Midterm Study Guide 1.The Etruscans: Italy 9th-5th centuries BC • The Villanovan civilization: • Early Iron Age, 9th-8th centuries BC, the Villanovan culture characterized all the Tyrrhenian Etruria, Emilia Romagna (particularly the area of Bologna and Rimini), Marche, Campania and Lucania (see map. 1) • Between Tuscany, Latium, Emilia, and some areas of Campania and the Po Valley, the Villanovan settlements are thick: one every 5-15km, on every hill that could be well defended, near water sources, smaller settlements along the coasts and the Apennines mounts. Map. 1 • 9th century: Villanovan settlements are well distributed in Central Italy, homogenous from a material point of view. • Oldest mention of the Villanovan civilization is in Hesiod, Teogonia (8-7th centuries BC): Tutti i popoli illustri della Tirrenia: all the non-Greek peoples of Italy . • Earlier inscriptions show an oriental alphabet, influenced by the Greeks. • A slow, progressive process of consolidation in the Italian Peninsula What we know about the Villanovan and their relation to the Etruscans It’s very hard to name a “civilization”, an ethnic group, the Villanovans, since all we know from them is from archaeological findings, their material culture. • We know that there were local cultures spread in Italy, basically nomads between the bronze (circa BC3500-1200) and the iron age (circa BC12th-8th centuries). • The earlier unions of peoples that we call Villanovan, arise in these centuries. Particularly along the Tuscan coasts, because they were very rich of iron and minerals, in fact the Villanova, such as the early Etruscans, were merchant civilizations. -
Ante Initium Suffragium
www.ridrom.uclm.es Abril - 2010 REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE DERECHO ROMANO ANTE INITIUM SUFFRAGIUM Ana Isabel Clemente Fernández Profesora Doctora de Derecho Romano Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha En relación con los tres órganos básicos de la forma política republicana, magistraturas, asambleas populares y Senado, tienen una importancia singular los magistrados en el sentido de las distintas y específicas funciones de gobierno que desempeñan, en claro equilibrio con el resto de órganos del sistema político republicano. En concreto, entre los principales cometidos asignados a los magistrados dotados de imperium se encuentra el de 159 www.ridrom.uclm.es Abril - 2010 presentar una rogatio o propuesta de ley ante los comicios1, previa convocatoria de los mismos en virtud del denominado ius agendi cum populo2. Esta rogatio consistía en una interrogación dirigida al pueblo, y éste debía responder, bien adhiriéndose, bien rechazando la interpelación del magistrado3. La rogatio propuesta por el magistrado era objeto de votación en los comitia centuriata, debiendo contar a posteriori con la anuencia del Senado. En el iter que recorre la propuesta, tras la votación comicial, se requiere, por tanto, la actuación senatorial mediante la prestación de la auctoritas patrum, pues entendemos que es necesario que las decisiones que emanan del 1 DE FRANCISCICI, Storia del diritto romano, I, Milano, 1943, pp. 305, 306; GROSSO, Lezioni di storia del diritto romano, 5ª ed. revis. y ampl., Torino, 1965, p. 222; DE MARTINO, Storia della costituzione romana, I, 2ª ed., Napoli, 1972, p. 295; ARANGIO-RUÍZ, Historia del derecho romano, trad. 2ª ed., de F. de Pelsmaeker e Ibáñez, 4ª ed., Madrid, 1980, p. -
KS 2 Lam Anglojęzyczny.Indd 1 2019-02-07 09:34:46 2 Kamil Sorka
Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2018; zeszyt specjalny, wersja anglojęzyczna (english version), s. 1–28 doi:10.4467/20844131KS.18.029.9117 www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa KAMIL SORKA Jagiellonian University in Kraków Usucapio pro herede in The Institutes of Gaius* Abstract Roman legal sources concerning usucapion in place of an heir (usucapio pro herede) are not numerous. We will only fi nd a relevant fragment in the second commentary of Gaius’ Institutiones and a short text Pro herede vel pro possessore in the 41st book of Justinian’s Digesta. The paper focuses on the exegesis of the fi rst of the sources. According to the institution of usucapion in place of an heir, anybody who possessed any goods belonging to an inheritance could acquire the inheritance within a year. Therefore, the main purpose of the institution seemed to be determining who was going to be responsible for continuing the domestic worship (sacra familiaria). When the sacra had lost their social signifi cance, usucapio pro herede changed its subject to the goods that belonged to an inheritance, not the inherit- ance as such. In classical Roman law, usucapion in place of an heir started to be considered a dishon- ourable legal institution. Emperor Hadrian marginalised usucapio pro herede through a decree of the senate sponsored by him. The senatus consultum made usucapion possible to reverse by the actual heir. Emperor Marcus Aurelius introduced a new crime, the crimen expilatae hereditatis, which consisted in taking over goods that belonged to someone else’s inheritance.