Bedrock Geological Map of the Mt Read Volcanics Belt
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Water Quality Commitments Factsheet
King and Yolande Sustainability Review Outcomes and commitments Water quality and river health Sustainability reviews provide Hydro These sites were monitored in September and November Tasmania with the opportunity to evaluate 2019, and January 2020. March and May sampling did not go ahead due to impacts of COVID-19. the impacts of our hydropower operations in the catchments we operate in. Based on the Measurements of nutrients, metals and aspects necessary to information review and community support aquatic life such as dissolved oxygen, were taken at the surface and various depths to collect information on consultation we undertook baseline water quality across the lakes. monitoring on water quality and river health, and a specific study on metal loads to Lake Burbury. The outcomes and commitments regarding water quality and river health within the King and Yolande catchments are presented below. Water quality Water quality was rated as the second highest concern in the community consultation survey. Two respondents commented on pollution in the King River from mine Water quality management: Lake Burbury (source: discharge to the Queen River. Concerns regarding legacy M.Wapstra) (historic) mine discharge via Linda Creek to Lake Burbury Outcome were also raised in the information review. Water quality at both lakes Burbury and Margaret has Water quality and river health information is important to remained consistent over time. Recent data fit within historic collect for the lakes and rivers we manage. This information ranges and expectations for both sites. allows us to measure any substantial change in water quality over time and better understand our waterways. -
West Coast Wilderness
WEst COast WILDERNESS WAY This route links the three World Heritage START: Cradle Mountain EXPLORE: Tasmania’s West Coast Areas of Cradle Mountain, the wild rivers of DURATION: 3-4 days the Franklin and lower Gordon River and NATIONAL PARKS ON THIS ROUTE: the land and 3,000 lakes that surround > Franklin-Gordon Wild Rivers National Park Lake St Clair. The route starts from Cradle Mountain and explores the unique post- settlement history of the region that includes convicts, miners and railway men and their families. LEG TIME / DISTANCE Cradle Mountain to Zeehan 1 hr 35 min / 106 km Zeehan to Strahan 41 min / 44 km Strahan to Queenstown 37 min / 41 km Queenstown to Lake St Clair (Derwent Bridge) 1 hr / 86 km Cradle Mountain - Zeehan > After enjoying the Cradle Mountain experience make your next stop Tullah, a town with a chequered history of mining and hydro development that now caters to visitors. > Stop for refreshments at Tullah Lakeside Lodge or maybe a bit of fishing on Lake Rosebery. > The town of Rosebery, a short drive farther southwest, is a working mine township proud of its environmental management. Tour the mine’s surface infrastructure. > Nearby is a three-hour return walk to Tasmania’s tallest waterfall, Montezuma Falls. > Continue on to Zeehan, once Tasmania’s third-largest town with gold and silver mines, numerous hotels and more than 10,000 residents. Now it’s at the centre of the west coast’s mining heritage, with the West Coast Heritage Centre, the unusual Spray Tunnel and the Grand Hotel and Gaiety Theatre. -
Annual Waterways Report
Annual Waterways Report King - Henty Catchment Water Assessment Branch 2009 ISSN: 1835-8489 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries and Water, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIW has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries and Water, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Department of Primary Industries and Water King-Henty Catchment Contents 1. About the catchment 2. Streamflow and Water Allocation 3. River Health 1. About the catchment The King-Henty catchment drains approximately 1,800 km 2 of land around the townships of Strahan, Queenstown and Zeehan on the west coast of Tasmania. Major rivers in the catchment include the King and Queen rivers, which together discharge into the north end of Macquarie Harbour, and the Henty and Little Henty rivers which discharge directly into the Southern Ocean. -
The Philosophers' Tale
1 Photo: Ollie Khedun Photo: THE VISION THE CONCEPT THE PROPOSAL The Philosophers’ Tale is The West Coast Range consists The Next Iconic Walk – The of 6 mountains on a north south Philosophers’ Tale 2019 proposal more than just an iconic walk, ridge. The ridge is trisected by the – Chapter One: Owen, takes it is made up of a series of Lyell Highway (between Mt Lyell people on a journey over 28km in iconic walks to be developed and Mt Owen) and the King River 3 days and 2 nights experiencing Gorge (between Mt Huxley and Mt mountain peaks, incredible views, over a period of time. There Jukes). This makes for three distinct button grass plains, cantilever are an abundance of coastal regions, each with their own part platforms and suspension bridges walks – the Overland Track to play in telling the bigger story. over deep river gorges down into All areas have been impacted cool temperate rainforest, majestic is now mature, and people by mining exploration or other waterfalls along the tranquil King are looking for the next development in the past 100 years. River on the incredible West Coast of Tasmania. With the option to option – The Philosophers’ The area is naturally divided into finish via train, hi-rail, raft, kayak, four zones, or in story telling Tale is just that. People will helicopter or jet boat, making it a parlance, ‘Chapters’. The Chapters be drawn locally and across truly unforgettable experience. (outlined on page 8), let’s call them the globe to experience these Owen, Jukes, Lyell and Tyndall lead View West Coast video iconic walks, returning time easily to the staged construction of any proposed track works. -
Alluvial Gold
GSHQI\ TASMANIA DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1991 MINERAL RESOURCES OFTASMANIA 11 Alluvial gold by R. S. Bottrill B.Sc. (Hons). M.Sc. DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES ISBN 0 7246 2083 4 GPO BOX 56, ROSNY PARK, TASMANIA 7018 ISSN 0313-1998 BoTIRILL, R. S. 1991. Alluvial gold. Miner. Resour. Tasm. II. ISBN 0 7246 2083 4 ISSN0313-2043 TECHNICAL EDITOR, E. L. Martin TEXT INpUT, C. M. Humphries Mineral Resources o/Tasmania is a continuation of Geological Survey Minerai Resources ALLUVIAL GOlD 3 CONTENTS Introduction .. 5 1. Mangana-Mathinna-Alberton 5 2. Gladstone-Derby . 5 3. Lisle ....... 5 4. Back Creek-Lefroy 5 5. Beaconsfield 6 6. Moina . ... 6 7. Wynyard .. 6 8. Arthur River 6 9. Corinna-Savage River .. ... 6 10. Ring River-Wilson River 6 11. Lyell-Darwin . ... 7 12. Jane River . 7 13. Cygnet 7 14. Others . .. 7 Discussion . 7 Acknowledgements . ..... 7 References . .... .. 9 Appendix A: Occurrences of alluvial gold in Tasmania . ..... .• •... .11 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Areas of major alluvial gold production in Tasmania ...... ... 4 2. Polished section of a gold grain from the Lisle goldfield, showing a porous I skeletal structure . 8 3. Polished section of a gold grain from the Lisle goldfield, showing a rim of silver-depleted gold on silver..,nriched gold ..... ......................... .... ......... 8 4 MlNERAL RESOURCES OF TASMANIA II 0 1+4 Scm PRINCIPAL AREAS OF ALLUVIAL GOLD PRODUCTION IN TASMANIA o 100 kilometres TN I 1470 Figure 1. Areas of major alluvial gold produclion in Tasmania described in the lext- 1: Mangana-Mathinna-Alberton, 2: Gladslon&-Derby, 3: Lisle, 4: Back Creek-Lefroy, 5: Beaconsfield, 6: Moina, 7: Wynyard, 8: Arthur River, 9: Corinna-Savage River, 10: Ring River-Wilson River, 11 : Lyell-Darwin, 12: Jane River, 13: Cygnet. -
Tasmanian Geological Survey: Acid Mine Drainage
TasmanianTasmanian Acid Acid DrainageDrainage Reconnaissance Reconnaissance ReportReport 1 1 AcidAcid drainage drainage fromfrom abandoned abandoned minesmines in in Tasmania Tasmania MINERAL RESOURCES TASMANIA Tasmanian Geological Survey Natural Heritage Tasmania Record 2001/05 DEPARTMENT of Trust INFRASTRUCTURE, Helping Communities ENERGYand RESOURCES Helping Australia Tasmanian Geological Survey Natural Heritage Record 2001/05 Trust Tasmania Helping Communities Helping Australia Tasmanian Acid Drainage Reconnaissance 1. Acid drainage from abandoned mines in Tasmania Dr Shivaraj Gurung FOREWORD Acid drainage, resulting from the oxidation of sulphide-bearing rocks, is recognised as one of the major sources of heavy metal pollution in many of waterways proximal to metal mining sites in Tasmania. Prior to this investigation, only limited information was available on the extent of acid drainage impact from historic abandoned mine sites. Section 37.5 of the Tasmanian State Policy on Water Quality Management (1997) requires that “an inventory of sources of acid drainage from historic mine workings should be carried out”. This reconnaissance investigation provides a basis for this inventory. The program is a component of the proposed State Water Quality and Quantity programs and was largely funded by the National Heritage Trust. Water analyses were carried out by the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment at the Analytical Service Tasmania laboratory. Geochemical analyses, map production and project management were carried out by Mineral Resources Tasmania. This report primarily focuses on acid drainage from abandoned mine sites in Tasmania. It presents new data and the compilation of existing data on water chemistry and geochemistry associated with abandoned mine sites in Tasmania. The report accompanies a series of acid drainage impact maps and an inventory of acid-producing abandoned mine sites. -
King-Henty Catchment
King-Henty Catchment Contents 1. About the catchment 2. River Health 1. About the catchment The King-Henty catchment drains approximately 1,800 km 2 of land around the townships of Strahan, Queenstown and Zeehan on the west coast of Tasmania. Major rivers in the catchment include the King and Queen rivers, which together discharge into the north end of Macquarie Harbour, and the Henty and Little Henty rivers which discharge directly into the Southern Ocean. The catchment experiences some of the highest rainfall in Tasmania, with annual rainfall in excess of 2,500 mm across most of the catchment. Two human-related activities have had a significant impact on the catchment; mining and hydro-electric power developments. A major power scheme in the King River has created 54 km 2 Lake Burbury. Water from Lake Burbury is re-routed through a tunnel and discharged to the lower King River just upstream of the junction of the Queen River. Parts of the headwaters of Lake Burbury lie within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. There is a long history of mining in the catchment, most notably in the headwaters of the Queen River at Mt Lyell. Acid mine drainage and tailings from past mining activities continue to impact on the environmental conditions of many rivers in the King-Henty catchment. DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES and WATER - 1 - 2. River Health The Australian River Assessment Ewart Creek at Zeehan Highway System (AUSRIVAS) is a This site is located approximately 3 kilometres standardised national system for upstream of the confluence of the Henty River assessment of river condition that and Ewart Creek and is sampled immediately uses benthic macroinvertebrates. -
Annex VIII Casestudy0510 Kin
IEA Hydropower Implementing Agreement Annex VIII – Hydropower Good Practices: Environmental Mitigation Measures and Benefits Case Study 05-10: Water Quality – King River Power Development, Australia Key Issue: 5- Water Quality Climate Zone: Cfb: Marine West Coast - Mild Subjects: - Heavy metal pollution from ongoing mining activity Crotty Dam - Sulphidic rock - Old tailing dumps - Low level of oxygen caused by thermal stratification Effects: - Prevention of the heavy metal polluted inflow into the reservoir - Sealing and revegetation of old tailing dumps - Aeration of water discharged downstream Project Name: King River Power Development Country: State of Tasmania, Australia Implementing Party & Period - Project: Hydro Tasmania 1983 - 1993 - Good Practice: Hydro Tasmania 1983 – 1993 Key Words: Water Quality in Reservoir, Heavy Metal Polluted Inflow, Water Aeration, Timber Salvage prior to Impoundment 1. Outline of the Project The King River Power Development is located in the southwest of Tasmania shown on Fig. 1. The Project, with an installed capacity of 143 MW, contains two dams, one 83 m high and the other 20 m high, a 7 km long headrace tunnel, power station with a single generator remotely controlled, 50 km of 220 kV transmission line, and some 36 km of road works. The lake created by the scheme has been developed to support both recreation and fishing and is of benefit to the whole west coast community of Tasmania. The construction works commenced in 1983 and was completed in 1993. The main dam, Crotty Dam is a concrete-faced gravel and rock fill embankment. The fill is local river gravels from the King River floodplain' upstream of the dam. -
Freshwater Systems Between 1997 and 2002, with the Addition of New Observations
Status of Trout-free Waters in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Report to Department of Primary Industries, and Water, Hobart. PE Davies, LSJ Cook, WR Robinson, T Sloane June 2009 82 Waimea Ave, Sandy Bay, FFrreesshhwwaatteerr Tasmania Australia 7005 Ph/Fax: 03 62254660 SSyysstteemmss [email protected] Aquatiic Enviironmentall Consulltiing Serviice Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 1. Aims and Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Aims ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Alien fish in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area .................................................. 6 1.3 Brown trout ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Value of trout-free waters ........................................................................................................ 8 2. Mapping the Distribution of Trout-free Waters ........................................................................... 10 2.1 Fish distribution database ...................................................................................................... -
A Five-Year Management Strategy for the Recreational Trout Fishery
A FIVE-YEAR MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR THE RECREATIONAL TROUT FISHERY FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PAPER NO. 250 Published by Department of Fisheries 168 St. Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 September 2011 ISSN 0819-4327 A Five-Year Management Strategy for the Recreational Trout Fishery September 2011 Fisheries Management Paper No. 250 ISSN 0819-4327 ii Fisheries Management Paper No.250 CONTENTS FOREWORD........................................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 1 summary OF recommendations .................................................. 2 1.1 Stocking of Trout .................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Recreational Fishing Management Arrangements .................................................. 3 SECTION 2 MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................... 5 SECTION 3 ISSUES AND recommendations ....................................................... 7 3.1 Designated Stocking Activity ................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Recreational trout stocking policy ................................................................ 7 3.1.2 Categorisation of river systems and dams ..................................................... 7 3.2 Stocking Guidelines ................................................................................................ 8 3.2.1 Recreational trout stocking guidelines ......................................................... -
Mineral Deposits of Tasmania
147°E 144°E 250000mE 300000mE 145°E 350000mE 400000mE 146°E 450000mE 500000mE 550000mE 148°E 600000mE CAPE WICKHAM MINERAL DEPOSITS AND METALLOGENY OF TASMANIA 475 ! -6 INDEX OF OCCURRENCES -2 No. REF. No. NAME COMMODITY EASTING NORTHING No. REF. No. NAME COMMODITY EASTING NORTHING No. REF. No. NAME COMMODITY EASTING NORTHING No. REF. No. NAME COMMODITY EASTING NORTHING No. REF. No. NAME COMMODITY EASTING NORTHING 1 2392 Aberfoyle; Main/Spicers Shaft Tin 562615 5388185 101 2085 Coxs Face; Long Plains Gold Mine Gold 349780 5402245 201 1503 Kara No. 2 Magnetite 402735 5425585 301 3277 Mount Pelion Wolfram; Oakleigh Creek Tungsten 419410 5374645 401 240 Scotia Tin 584065 5466485 INNER PHOQUES # 2 3760 Adamsfield Osmiridium Field Osmium-Iridium 445115 5269185 102 11 Cullenswood Coal 596115 5391835 202 1506 Kara No. 2 South Magnetite 403130 5423745 302 2112 Mount Ramsay Tin 372710 5395325 402 3128 Section 3140M; Hawsons Gold 414680 5375085 SISTER " 3 2612 Adelaide Mine; Adelaide Pty Crocoite 369730 5361965 103 2593 Cuni (Five Mile) Mineral Field Nickel 366410 5367185 203 444 Kays Old Diggings; Lawries Gold 375510 5436485 303 1590 Mount Roland Silver 437315 5409585 403 3281 Section 7355M East Coal 418265 5365710 The Elbow 344 Lavinia Pt ISLAND BAY 4 4045 Adventure Bay A Coal 526165 5201735 104 461 Cuprona Copper King Copper 412605 5446155 204 430 Keith River Magnesite Magnesite 369110 5439185 304 2201 Mount Stewart Mine; Long Tunnel Lead 359230 5402035 404 3223 Selina Eastern Pyrite Zone Pyrite 386310 5364585 5 806 Alacrity Gold 524825 5445745 -
King River, Tasmania, Tailings, Remediation, Revegetation
Resources and Environment 2014, 4(5): 238-245 DOI: 10.5923/j.re.20140405.05 A 12-month Field Trial to Remediate an Exposed “Tailings Beach” in Tasmania Lee Fergusson Principal Consultant, Prana World Consulting, Queensland, Australia Abstract The King River is one of the most polluted rivers in Australia; it has been predicted that acid mine drainage will be produced in the river for several hundred years, with 2.0 tonnes of copper and 155 kg of sulfuric acid entering the river system each day. Reversing the damaging effects of dumped tailings on this scale is financially and operationally impossible; the only hope for recovery is natural weathering and, where possible, interventions that raise pH and reduce contaminants entering the system, thereby allowing revegetation of the exposed “tailings beach”. Drawing from descriptive, empirical and photographic evidence, this study documents the findings of a 12-month field trial conducted in the King River delta. Treatment of tailings included applications to areas of contaminated tailings: Area #1, control; Area #2, lime and fertilizer; Area #3, soil; Area #4, sand; and Area #5, Terra B; each area was seeded using local tree species, with vegetative cover density and type the main criteria of successful remediation. Evidence suggests lime and fertilizer, and soil and sand amendments had no effect on tree growth after 12 months; the control and these amended areas did not support revegetation. However Area #5 had a pH of 3.9 before and 7.9 after treatment, and leachable metals had been reduced by an average 88%, with total actual and potential acidity reduced to zero.