DOCSLIB.ORG

Sitting Hours

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sitting Hours House of Commons Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons Sitting Hours First Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 December 2004 HC 88 [Incorporating HC 892, Session 2003-04] Published on 11 January 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons is appointed by the House of Commons to consider how the practices and procedures of the House should be modernised. Current membership Mr Peter Hain MP (Labour, Neath) (Chairman) Ann Coffey MP (Labour, Stockport) Barbara Follett MP (Labour, Stevenage) Mr Oliver Heald MP (Conservative, North East Hertfordshire) Mr David Kidney MP (Labour, Stafford) Martin Linton MP (Labour, Battersea) Mr Patrick McLoughlin MP (Conservative, West Derbyshire) Anne Picking MP (Labour, East Lothian) Mr Peter Pike MP (Labour, Burnley) Joan Ruddock MP (Labour, Lewisham Deptford) Mr Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Mr Andrew Stunell MP (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Mr Paul Tyler MP (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Sir Nicholas Winterton MP (Conservative, Macclesfield) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Mr Andrew Mitchell MP (Conservative, Sutton Coldfield) Mr David Cameron MP (Conservative, Witney) Mr Greg Knight MP (Conservative, East Yorkshire) Dr John Reid MP (Labour, Hamilton North & Bellshill) (Chairman) Caroline Flint MP (Labour, Don Valley) Mr Robin Cook MP (Labour, Livingston) (Chairman) Mrs Lorna Fitzsimons MP (Labour, Rochdale) Mr John M. Taylor (Conservative, Solihull) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in an Appendix to the House of Commons Standing Orders. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/modcom/ A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are George Cubie and Tom Healey (Clerks), Susan Morrison (Chief Office Clerk) and Jane Cooper (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk, Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons, Journal Office, House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 3318; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Sitting Hours 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 Conclusions and recommendations 5 Introduction 8 Background 8 Options for change 10 Monday 11 Tuesday 12 Private Members’ bills in the evening 12 Other business after 7 p.m. 14 Reversion to the old hours 15 Wednesday 16 Thursday 17 Friday 18 Sittings of the House and their impact on other business 18 Select committees 19 Standing committees 19 Westminster Hall 21 Recess dates 22 The September sitting, recesses and school holidays 22 Formal minutes 25 Witnesses 29 List of written evidence 30 Reports from the Committee since the beginning of the 2001 Parliament 33 Sitting Hours 3 Summary At the beginning of 2003, the House adopted the following new sitting hours: Current sitting hours to Sitting Hours before January 2003 scheduled end of main business to scheduled end of main business Monday 2.30 p.m.–10.00 p.m. 2.30 p.m.–10.00 p.m. Tuesday 11.30 a.m.–7.00 p.m. 2.30 p.m.–10.00 p.m. Wednesday 11.30 a.m.–7.00 p.m. 2.30 p.m.–10.00 p.m. Thursday 11.30 a.m.–6.00 p.m. 11.30 a.m.–7.00 p.m. Friday 9.30 a.m.–2.30 p.m. 9.30 a.m.–2.30 p.m. The new arrangements will expire at the end of the present Parliament and the Modernisation Committee has produced this Report in order to inform the debate which will take place in the House in early 2005, when the House will need to decide the sitting hours for the beginning of the next Parliament (paragraphs 1–9). The Committee has consulted widely among Members and has drawn on the Procedure Committee’s useful survey of Members’ views on the subject, conducted in early 2004. The Committee recommends retaining the current arrangements on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays (paragraphs 10–25, 31 & 32). Thursday is no longer used as much as it once was for substantial whipped business. As well as causing a ‘bunching’ of business in the Chamber on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, this has tended to exacerbate clashes between standing committees, select committees, and the Chamber. The Committee recommends lengthening the Thursday sitting by one hour, by sitting at 10.30 a.m. and keeping the current finish time for the main business of 6 p.m. This would restore the sitting day to sufficient length to take substantial business such as major second readings and Opposition days (paragraphs 26–30) There has been an overall loss of time in standing committees as early morning sittings have proved inconvenient and committees are reluctant to sit into the evening if the House is not sitting. The Committee recommends that, in order to increase the amount of time available to standing committees, the period of time during which committees are not allowed to meet in the middle of the day should be shortened from 2½ hours to 2 hours. It will still be for standing committees to determine their own pattern of sittings (paragraphs 4 Sitting Hours 35–39). The timing of standing and select committee meetings is a matter for committees themselves, but the Committee makes a number of suggestions as to how some of the current congestion of committee meetings might be relieved (paragraphs 33, 34 & 38). Although it is not governed by the Standing Orders, and therefore not something on which the House now needs to take a decision, the Committee also comments on the annual pattern of sittings and recesses (paragraphs 41–46). The Committee proposes that, in the absence of a September sitting in 2005, there should be a two-week period when questions for written answer can be tabled and answered (paragraph 46). Sitting Hours 5 Conclusions and recommendations Introduction 1. We recommend that, well before the likely end of the current Session, the Leader of the House make time for a debate on a Motion to amend the Standing Orders so as to make the current sitting hours permanent, subject to the changes proposed in this Report. (Paragraph 3) Monday 2. We recommend that the House retain the current sitting hours on Mondays, and on Tuesdays and Wednesdays which immediately follow a recess. We see some scope, however, for additional select committee activity late on Monday afternoons— although we recognise that it is for committees themselves to decide when to meet. We also believe that there might be scope for more standing committee meetings on Monday afternoons, but we would discourage any move in that direction until the Chairmen’s Panel has had an opportunity to consider its possible consequences. (Paragraph 10) Private Members’ bills in the evening 3. It seems certain to us that private Members’ bills, if they were taken on a weekday evening, would often become whipped business. Not only would this lead to a day with 11 hours or more of whipped business, it would fundamentally change the character of the proceedings, with the intrusion of whipping into time which has so far been at the free disposal of backbenchers; there might also be other, less predictable changes. It could result in legislative business being settled very late in the evening on those occasions when Government business continued much beyond 7 p.m. (see paragraph 17 below). Our judgement is that it would not be right for such a major overhaul of private Members’ bills procedure to happen as a by- product of changes to the sitting hours of the House. We recommend that private Members’ bills should retain their place on 13 Fridays each year for the time being, until we have had an opportunity to carry out a comprehensive review of the purpose of private Members’ bills and of PMB procedure, consulting with the Procedure Committee which has investigated this matter. (Paragraph 15) Tuesday 4. We expect that the House will be able to express a clear view on Tuesday sittings when this report is debated and we recommend that the House retain the current sitting arrangements on Tuesdays. (Paragraph 24) 6 Sitting Hours Wednesday 5. We recommend that the House retain the current sitting arrangements on Wednesdays. (Paragraph 25) Thursday 6. We believe that it should be a priority for the House to restore Thursday to a full sitting day. (Paragraph 26) 7. We recommend that, in order to gain an hour at Thursday sittings, the House should meet one hour earlier on a Thursday morning, at 10.30 a.m. Notice periods for Urgent Questions, presentation of public petitions and other business for which notice is usually given on the day of the sitting should also change accordingly. (Paragraph 30) Friday 8. We recommend that the arrangements for Friday sittings remain unchanged although, as we have already indicated, we believe that this Committee should conduct a thorough review of the purpose of private Members’ bills and the procedure governing them, in consultation with the Procedure Committee. (Paragraph 32) Select committees 9. We believe that lengthening Thursday sittings to allow more major business to be taken on that day will improve attendance on Thursdays and so help to relieve the problems caused by the bunching of select committee meetings into only two days a week.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MS Annual Report Dec 05.Qxd
    December 2005 Parliamentary News Martin Salter’s Eighth Annual Report to Constituents Reading West Constituency – which includes: Pangbourne, Purley, Tilehurst, Theale, Calcot, Coley, Norcot, Southcote, Whitley and the Oxford Road Working for Reading West Since he was first elected as Member of Parliament in 1997 Martin Salter has established a reputation as a hard-working constituency MP who gets results for local people. Martin believes in keeping in touch with his constituents and produces an Annual Report setting out what he has been doing on your behalf during the last year. “ Dear Resident 2005 has been a year of triumphs and disasters. It began with the awful scenes of devastation from the Asian Tsunami which prompted a generous worldwide response in which the people of Reading played their part. We scarcely had time to enjoy the triumph of Britain winning the Olympics bid before the dreadful London bombings of 7th July. COMMUNITY CHAMPIONS – The Prime Minister asked Martin to invite two community workers to 10 Downing Street. Street warden Ahmed Abd-Eighany Obviously I was pleased to have been re-elected for the and Battle Library’s Marjorie McClure were thanked personally by Tony Blair for their hard work. third time in a row and in the constituency I’ve been as busy as ever: successfully fighting off plans to merge Calcot Infant and Junior Schools; winning extra funding for Salter Wins a Third Term Prospect College, Denefield, Brookfields and Long Lane Reading West MP, Martin Salter, was comfortably re- Primary Schools; helping get rid of the illegal travellers elected on May 5th to serve a third term in Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Interests of Members’ Secretaries and Research Assistants
    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 11 July 2018) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £380 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £380 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF on Watching the Watchmen
    REPORT Watching the Watchmen The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Sam Goodman About the Author Sam Goodman is the author of the Imperial Premiership: The Role of the Modern Prime Minister in Foreign Policy Making, 1964-2015 (Manchester University Press: 2015). He is currently working as a political adviser to Peter Dowd MP the current Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and has previously worked for a variety of Labour Members of Parliament including: Julie Cooper MP, Sir Mark Hendrick MP, Michael Dugher MP, and Rt. Hon Jack Straw MP. Watching the Watchmen: The Growing Case for Recall Elections and Increased Accountability for MPs Members of the House of Commons have long flirted parliamentary conventions and much procedure with the idea of British exceptionalism—citing the is arcane, which makes it difficult even for the UK’s role as the ‘mother of all parliaments’, its most ardent politically engaged citizen to follow unwritten constitution, its unitary voting system, proceedings and debates in the House of Commons. and the principle of the sovereignty of Parliament This separation between the governors and over the people—as a bulwark against the instability governed is exacerbated further by the limited customarily found in other western democracies. avenues available to the public to hold those elected In modern times, this argument held water as to account, which is exemplified by recent political it delivered stable parliamentary majorities, scandals, including allegations of bullying and peaceful transfers of power between governments, sexual harassment in the House of Commons. At the and kept in check the ideological fringes of both time of writing this report, no MP has been forced major political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Martin Salter - Curriculum Vitae Tilehurst, Reading, Berkshire Email: [email protected] Profile A highly successful campaigner and political strategist with over 30 years experience in the Trade Union movement, local government and national politics. An excellent communicator with strong media links. A tough and effective political organiser with the ability to develop and translate policy objectives to the wider public. Experience • Organising and winning elections in highly marginal political situations. • Developing local and national campaign strategies • Planning and delivering effective media campaigns • Thirteen years as a Member of Parliament working closely with ministers on political strategy and policy development. • Twelve years in local government helping to lead one of the most successful councils in the UK. • Leading community - based projects and managing staff and budgets. • Campaigning with NGOs to effect change at a national level. • Senior roles on Parliamentary Select Committees and legislative scrutiny. • Inspiring and motivating team members and colleagues. • Writing, proofing and editing publications, news releases and speeches • Event planning and organisation. • Crisis management and problem solving. Career Summary 1997 to 2010 - Labour MP for Reading West Elected on three occasions, securing one of the largest swings to Labour in the UK. Became an effective and respected senior backbencher with national roles in campaigning and policy development. Appointed Vice Chair (Environment) of the Labour Party in 2007 (see Political Biography for more details). 1984-96 - Reading Borough Councillor Became Chair of the Leisure Committee in 1986 and Deputy Leader from 1987. Overhauled leisure, recreation and community services and brought major music festivals to Reading. Helped plan the successful development of the town centre and steered Labour to unprecedented local electoral success.
    [Show full text]
  • None of the Above: the UK House of Commons Votes on Reforming the House of Lords, February 2003
    d:/1polq/74-3/mclean.3d ^ 24/6/3 ^ 16:6 ^ bp/sh None of the Above: The UK House of Commons Votes on Reforming the House of Lords, February 2003 IAIN MCLEAN, ARTHUR SPIRLING AND MEG RUSSELL The preamble to the UK's Parliament Act cent) of the members of a future house be 1911 (1 & 2 Geo. 5 c.13) states that that Act elected, but rejected the Royal Com- is a temporary measure only: mission's proposal that all appointed members be chosen by an independent Whereas it is intended to substitute for the House of Lords as it at present exists a Second appointments commission. Chamber constituted on a popular instead of This White Paper had a poor reception. hereditary basis, but substitution cannot be The Lord Chancellor's Department, immediately brought into operation . which issued it, later analysed the re- sponses to it. Of the 82 per cent of Attempts to bring the substitution into respondents who discussed election, operation in 1949 and 1968 failed. The 89 per cent `called for a house that was Labour Party's 1997 manifesto states: 50per cent or more elected'. Of the 17 per The House of Lords must be reformed. As an cent of respondents who discussed the initial, self-contained reform, not dependent future of the Church of England bishops, on further reform in the future, the right of 85 per cent opposed their continued pre- hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House sence in the house. Of the 12 per cent of of Lords will be ended by statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election Results, 29 MARCH 2001 1 May 1997
    RESEARCH PAPER 01/38 General Election results, 29 MARCH 2001 1 May 1997 This paper summarises the results of the 1997 General Election. It is a re-issue of Research Paper 97/49 but contains validated voting figures and also additional tables showing results by constituency. Full results of by-elections in this Parliament are available in Research Paper 01/36 By-elections since the 1997 General Election while more summarised results of General Elections since 1945 and other elections in the UK since 1997 are available in Research Paper 01/37 UK Election Statistics: 1945-2000. Bryn Morgan SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 01/23 The Transplant of Human Organs Bill [Bill 17 of 2000-2001] 14.03.01 01/24 Direct taxes: rates & allowances 2001-02 14.03.01 01/25 Unemployment by constituency, February 2001 14.03.01 01/26 The Regulatory Reform Bill: Background to Red tape issues 14.03.01 01/27 The Regulatory Reform Bill: order-making power & parliamentary aspects 14.03.01 01/28 Police Service Strength: England & Wales (31 March 1977 to 30 September 2000) 16.03.01 01/29 The Special Needs and Disability Bill [HL] [Bill 55 of 2000-2001] 16.03.01 01/30 Election of a Commons Speaker (2nd Edition) 19.03.01 01/31 The National Lottery (Amendment) Bill [Bill 15 of 2000-2001] 22.03.01 01/32 The Social Security Fraud Bill [Bill 60 of 2000-2001] 21.03.01 01/33 The Adoption and Children Bill [Bill 66 of 2000-2001] 23.03.01 01/34 The Private Security Industry Bill [Bill 67 of 2000-2001] 26.03.01 01/35 Foot and Mouth Disease 27.03.01 01/36 By-elections 1997-2000 28.03.01 01/37 UK election statistics 1945-2000 29.03.01 Research Papers are available as PDF files: • to members of the general public on the Parliamentary web site, URL: http://www.parliament.uk • within Parliament to users of the Parliamentary Intranet, URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 20-21
    Annual report and financial statements 2020-21 1 Annual report and financial statements 2020-21 Contents Welcome from the Chair 3 The impact of COVID-19 5 Our purpose and method 6 Vision and strategic objectives 6 Skills for Life Our plan to prepare better futures 2018-2023 7 How we operate 8 Our members 9 Growth during a global pandemic 10 Governance structure and Board membership 11 Our advisers Team Cheshire 12 Roll of Honour 13 Our finances 20 Independent Examiners Report Financial statements 21 Our thanks 2 This has given us the peculiar Administration Welcome situation of the current County Thanks to the foresight of Graham Commissioner Dave Hopley Phillips and the backing of the Scout from the reporting on the year when the Association we have been at the previous County Commissioner was forefront of creating young leaders County Chair in office. Dave Hopley was well in roles that helped us well at the prepared coming from his role as start of this pandemic, switching Deputy County Commissioner and from face-to-face scouting to online Be Prepared! reading his report I think you will at the drop of a hat. All Meetings of This has been the most agree that we have had a smooth the Executive, and its sub- extraordinary year in Scouting, not transition. At this stage I would like committees have met online. I thank so much for planned activities but to thank those people who also put Janet Williamson our County for the lack of them when actions their names forward for the role of Secretary for organising and taken have been to keep Scouting CC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Parliament in a Modern Democracy
    A Modern Parliament in a Modern Democracy State of the Union Annual Lecture by Rt Hon. Robin Cook MP Leader of the House December 2001 Published by The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy UCL (University College London) 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU Tel: 020 7679 4977 Fax:020 7679 4978 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/ ©The Constitution Unit, UCL 2001 This report is sold subject to the condition that is shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. First Published December 2001 A Modern Parliament in a Modern Democracy State of the Union Annual Lecture Rt Hon. Robin Cook MP, Leader of the House Chancellor’s Hall, Senate House, University of London It is an honour to be invited to give this lecture to the Constitution Unit on the publication of their report on the State of the Nations. One of the unequal contests between government and opposition is the difficulty of an opposition to obtaining quality advice in preparing its plans for government. It is for that reason that after taking office in 1997 we trebled the amount of Short Money available to the opposition parties. It has long been clear that a high priority for the incoming Labour Government would be constitutional reform. Indeed our first Parliament witnessed a degree of constitutional reform which probably has no match in terms of breadth or significance since the great reform acts of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945
    The Speaker of the House of Commons: The Office and Its Holders since 1945 Matthew William Laban Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 1 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I, Matthew William Laban, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of this thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: Details of collaboration and publications: Laban, Matthew, Mr Speaker: The Office and the Individuals since 1945, (London, 2013). 2 ABSTRACT The post-war period has witnessed the Speakership of the House of Commons evolving from an important internal parliamentary office into one of the most recognised public roles in British political life. This historic office has not, however, been examined in any detail since Philip Laundy’s seminal work entitled The Office of Speaker published in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of All-Party Groups
    REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS (As at 13 June 2007) REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 2 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................................................................... 2 The Nature of All-Party Groups ..................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Register of All-Party Groups’............................................... 2 Purpose and Form of the ‘Approved List’ of Groups..................................................... 2 Administration of the Register and Approved List......................................................... 4 Complaints about All-Party Groups................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Country Groups ...................................................................................................... 6 Section 2: Subject Groups.................................................................................................... 141 REGISTER OF ALL-PARTY GROUPS PAGE 3 SECTION 1: COUNTRY GROUPS INTRODUCTION The Nature of All-Party Groups All-party groups are regarded as relatively informal compared with other cross-party bodies such as select committees of the House. The membership of all-party groups mainly comprises backbench Members of the House of Commons and Lords but may also include ministers and non-parliamentarians. Groups flourish and wane according to the interests and enthusiasm of Members.
    [Show full text]